About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

In trailer to new anti-Clinton movie, Peter Paul baselessly suggests connection between anti-Clinton lawsuit and detention in Brazilian jail

October 26, 2007 9:38 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: A FoxNews.com article reported that allegations against the Clintons made by Peter F. Paul -- a lawyer and businessman who has been convicted of fraud -- in the purported documentary "Hillary Uncensored" include an accusation that the Clintons "made sure Paul was kept in a Brazilian prison for 25 months, including 58 days in a maximum security cellblock nicknamed the 'Corridor of Death,' while the Justice Department waited to extradite him." In the trailer, Paul is not shown alleging that the Clintons "made sure" he "was kept in a Brazilian prison," but he does suggest a connection between his filing of a civil lawsuit against the Clintons and his detention in a Brazilian jail. In fact, Paul was indicted after Bill Clinton left office, and, according to the U.S. attorney's office that indicted him, Paul was arrested in Brazil because he refused to return to the United States.

30 Comments

An October 26 FoxNews.com article about a new purported documentary, "Hillary Uncensored," reported that the film sets out allegations by Peter F. Paul -- a lawyer and businessman who has been convicted of fraud -- against Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and former President Bill Clinton. According to the article, among the "allegations summarized in the documentary" is an accusation that the Clintons "made sure Paul was kept in a Brazilian prison for 25 months, including 58 days in a maximum security cellblock nicknamed the 'Corridor of Death,' while the Justice Department waited to extradite him." In the movie's 13-minute trailer, Paul is not shown alleging that the Clintons "made sure" he "was kept in a Brazilian prison," but he does suggest a connection between his filing of a civil lawsuit against the Clintons and his detention in the Brazilian prison: [transcript begins at 5:51]

PAUL: And I delivered a demand letter to Hillary Clinton. We had filed the civil suit against the Clintons, which detailed all the money that I had spent with copies of checks and invoices. And then I discovered that I was being investigated in connection with the misuse of my brokerage accounts. I was suddenly detained by Interpol in Brazil for extradition. They moved me to a remote part of this jail which was called the "Corridor of Death," in which 16 inmates had been immolated. They would be chanting "burn the gringo." My family wasn't able to hear from me at all. They didn't know what was happening.

ANDREA PAUL: And I never knew from one day to the next if he was alive or dead.

PAUL: The Clintons were able to have the original civil suit thrown out on the basis of -- that I was a fugitive at the time.

However, in the trailer, Paul does not mention that the events he describes occurred after Bill Clinton left office. Moreover, according to the U.S. attorney's office for the Eastern District of New York, which had indicted him, Paul was arrested in Brazil because he refused to return to the United States. From a March 8, 2005, press release from the office, headlined "Peter Paul, Co-founder of Stan Lee Media, Inc., Pleads Guilty to Securities Fraud[;] Fraud Scheme Caused $25 Million in Losses to Investors and Financial Institutions":

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced in 2001 that it was investigating Stan Lee Media. After that announcement and before he was first indicted, PAUL left the United States for Brazil and refused to return after the United States Attorney's Office informed him that he was the target of a criminal investigation. Subsequent to the filing of first indictment, PAUL again refused the United States Attorney's Office demand that he return to this country. Accordingly, the government sought the assistance of law enforcement authorities in Brazil. On August 3, 2001, PAUL was arrested in Brazil and jailed pending the outcome of extradition proceedings, which PAUL contested for the next two years. In July 2003, the Supreme Court of Brazil ordered PAUL's extradition to the United States. PAUL was arraigned in September 2003 on the original securities fraud charges, and his trial was scheduled to commence on March 28, 2005.

Several news reports of his imprisonment in Brazil report differing versions of who is alleged to have been responsible and the extent to which he resisted extradition, but do not suggest a connection between his lawsuit against the Clintons and his detention in Brazil.

For example, a September 7, 2003, New York Post article, featured in the trailer and bearing the headline "CELL HELL FOR HILLARY NEMESIS," reported:

AFTER more than two years in a Brazilian prison, a shadowy felon who says he has enough dirt on Hillary Rodham Clinton to end her career is going to be extradited to the United States - if he lives that long.

Peter Paul - whose dealings with Bill and Hillary Clinton sparked an ongoing federal investigation into the former first couple's fund raising - has been wanted in New York to answer stock-manipulation charges since June 2001. In the past, he has fought extradition while negotiating with U.S. investigators, but that all changed recently when Brazilian authorities put him in the dreaded "Corridor of Death."

Paul was put in the notorious Block F of Brazil's maximum-security state penitentiary in Brasilia. The nation's most vicious criminals are housed in Block F, where a favorite pastime among inmates is to burn their fellow prisoners alive in their cells.

The conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, which represents Paul, reports that 16 inmates have met their ends by immolation there in the last year alone.

"It's extremely dangerous for him there," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton tells PAGE SIX's Ian Spiegelman. "He's already been threatened."

Fitton says there's an ongoing war between various prison factions and that "Americans aren't very popular" with any of them. As far as the inmates of Block F are concerned, "Getting an American would be a coup."

Paul has claimed that he can prove Sen. Clinton accepted at least $2 million in campaign contributions from him in 2000 but reported only $500,000 of it.

It's a mystery why Paul remained in a Brazil jail even after that country's Supreme Court decided he should be extradited last December. After that, Fitton says he continually pressured officials at the U.S. Embassy to fetch Paul, but they told him they needed "official" notice from the Brazilian foreign minister before they could do so.

Oddly, just days after that official notice was sent, Paul was transferred to the Corridor of Death on Aug. 20 while U.S. authorities continued to show no interest in following through with the extradition.

After several complaints from Fitton, the feds finally decided on Friday that Paul would be returned to the United States on Sept. 12, if he's lucky.

Sen. Clinton's rep declined comment.

On March 15, 2005, The New York Times reported that "Paul also says that by botching his defense in a criminal case concerning stock fraud that he pleaded guilty to last week, the organization [Judicial Watch] caused his unnecessary detention in a Brazilian jail for two years while he awaited extradition to the United States, which occurred in September 2003." From the Times report:

Mr. Paul says Judicial Watch let his civil suit against the Clintons linger in court while using it to raise more than $15 million since 2001 from people who dislike the Clintons. Mr. Paul also says that by botching his defense in a criminal case concerning stock fraud that he pleaded guilty to last week, the organization caused his unnecessary detention in a Brazilian jail for two years while he awaited extradition to the United States, which occurred in September 2003. The group is now backing out of its agreement to pay the legal fees relating to Mr. Paul's criminal case, Mr. Paul says.

[...]

It all started in March 2001, when Mr. Paul says Judicial Watch agreed to handle his criminal and civil legal matters.

At the time, Mr. Paul was in Brazil, where he had gone in December 2000 to attend to a second business that he owned, soon after the collapse of Stan Lee Media, an Internet company that he had co-founded. Mr. Paul was facing criminal charges of stock fraud relating to the company. He also had a civil suit against the Clintons, in which he says that he gave close to $2 million in services and donations to Mrs. Clinton's Senate campaign based on promises that Mr. Clinton would join Mr. Paul's Internet company when the president left office. These promises were never fulfilled, he says.

Mr. Paul said that by failing to dedicate sufficient resources to his civil suit, Judicial Watch left the case to idle in California courts. And in taking an overly combative approach to negotiations with the Department of Justice regarding Mr. Paul's return for trial in the United States from Brazil, Judicial Watch lengthened his prison stay, Mr. Paul said.

''Had Peter's prior counsel been more willing to plea with the government, as we were willing to do, it would not have taken two years to get him out of the Brazilian prison,'' said Joseph R. Conway, the lawyer whom Mr. Paul hired in October 2004 to take over the criminal case.

According to a September 2, 2003, Judicial Watch press release, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said "the Bush Administration continues to delay his [Paul's] return":

Five weeks after the Brazilian Foreign Minister notified the U.S. Embassy in Brasilia, Brazil that Peter F. Paul's extradition process had been completed and U.S. officials should immediately return him to the U.S. to face stock manipulation and other related charges, the U.S. Embassy in Brazil has failed to arrange for Paul's delivery to a federal court in New York.

Paul, the largest donor to Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign, told the Ashcroft Justice Department that he made at least $2 million in contributions to Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign with the expectation that Bill Clinton would work with him in return for a $15 million in cash and stock from Stan Lee Media, a NASDAQ company named after Spiderman creator Stan Lee. Peter Paul, who co-founded Stan Lee Media with Mr. Lee, has been cooperating with Department of Justice investigators about the criminal issues surrounding his dealings with the Clintons. As part of Paul's good faith proffer to investigators, Paul detailed Mrs. Clinton's personal knowledge of his contributions, none of which the former First Lady and current U.S. Senator reported to the Federal Election Commission, and how she directed the diversion of Paul's payment of $55,000 of Stan Lee Media stock to an outside political entity working on her behalf. Paul also detailed allegations that for several years, the FBI allowed one of its organized crime operatives to loot publicly traded companies under the guise of criminal investigations, while the government looked the other way. Reports by The Los Angeles Times and Vanity Fair have confirmed key aspects of Paul's information concerning the Clintons and FBI corruption. A criminal investigation of the Clintons has begun relating to the August 2000 fundraiser.

In the midst of this cooperation, Paul was indicted in New York on alleged stock fraud and conspiracy charges on June 12, 2001. He was then indicted in California on alleged bank fraud charges. When he was indicted, Paul was in Brazil managing businesses he had there for many years, was cooperating with Justice Department, and was making arrangements to return to the U.S. to address the criminal charges against him. He was picked up by Brazilian police on August 3, 2001.

On August 20, 2003, after over two years in various Brazilian prisons, Paul was moved to the notorious Block F section of maximum security state penitentiary in Brasilia, where Paul is being held pending his extradition to the U.S. Paul, the only American ever to be imprisoned there, was placed among some of Brazil's most dangerous criminals, in a cell in the "Corridor of Death," infamous for the regular murder of prisoners by immolation. Mr. Paul has learned that more than sixteen prisoners have been burned alive in their cells in "Block F" within the past year alone. Paul has attempted to expedite the conclusion of his extradition proceeding since the Brazilian Supreme Court ruled in December, 2002 that he could be returned to the U.S. Yet the U.S. government has failed to respond to the Brazilian government's official notice to retrieve Paul, sent to the U.S. Embassy in Brasilia on July 18, 2003. Judicial Watch lawyers in Brazil have filed a petition with the Brazilian Supreme Court seeking protection and better conditions for Paul.

"Mr. Paul is a key witness in a criminal investigation regarding the Clintons. Mr. Paul's life is in jeopardy every day in a brutal and dangerous Brazilian prison, while the Bush Administration continues to delay his return. If the United States government wanted Mr. Paul home, it would have acted at least nine months ago to expedite his return. Mr. Paul should be brought back home immediately so that he can continue to cooperate with the government's investigation into the Clintons and FBI corruption," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

On September 30, 2003, The Miami Herald reported:

Acting on a request from U.S. prosecutors, Brazilian police arrested Paul in August 2001 and held him in a Sao Paulo facility while he fought extradition. This month, his legal defenses finally failed and he was moved to the Brooklyn, N.Y., Metropolitan Detention Center.

"He's happy to be back in the United States, and he wants to get this behind him," said Tom Fitton, head of Judicial Watch, a legal watchdog group that has been asking prosecutors to listen to Paul, who claims to have information potentially damaging to U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and California Gov. Gray Davis, also a Democrat.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by eweston8542983 (October 26, 2007 10:00 pm ET)
         

      Interesting, I wonder what "Smilin Stan" Lee has had to say on the matter?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (October 26, 2007 10:03 pm ET)
           

        "Excelsior!"

        Report Abuse
      • Author by pbg (October 27, 2007 12:15 am ET)
           

        This guy is scum. Ask anyone who followed what happened with StanLee.com--and I know a bunch. Your quintessential wheeler-dealer-suddenly-there's-no-money-and-he's-vanished type of guy.

        I kniw for certain that Stan The Man would love to see the Silver Surfer's surfboard up you know where.

        And HE's the source for this? Wow.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (October 26, 2007 10:00 pm ET)
         

      yeah but it has to be bill clinton's fault....it just has to be....how can we make it through the day without something being bill clinton's fault...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (October 26, 2007 10:13 pm ET)
         

      Talk about your love hate relationships. If this should happen to be serious enough to bring Champaign Clinton to a screeching halt, they'd be stunned. What am I going to shrieck about now? Edward's haircut? It just doesn't have the traction and detail of a good Anti-Clinton rant.

      There goes alot of GOP energy with her, just when they'd need energy to properly demonize who ever'd take the nomination. With Hillary its almost automatic at least 20 bogus attacks extent to endlessly repete and refine.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (October 26, 2007 11:19 pm ET)
           

        There are more attacks on the Clintons daily from the far right than all the ordnance dropped on Baghdad during Shock and Awe.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by aig_alumni5288 (October 27, 2007 8:20 am ET)
             

          Mediamatters does us a disservice by focusing on a tiny slice of the entire pie. 

          I watched the clip. It seems substantiated that Peter Paul gave the Clinton campaign $1.9M They have videos of her thanking Paul. She's even at a small house party thanking him(all on film). Both the Clintons sent Paul letters thanking him. Paul even has her on tape noting she was aware of the fund raising.

          People can put two and two together.

          We can't be sheep. We have to open our eyes about this lady. The people are certainly going to open their eyes to this lady. Obama's our only hope. 

           

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by ajwan (October 29, 2007 12:34 pm ET)
               

            What part of the, he was indicted for fraud in the USA, then skipped town to hole up in Brazil, whereby the USA asked Brazil for help in extradicting him, all after Clinton left office, did you miss?

            If you believe Clinton still ran the govenment after he left office or you just trust this guy then go ahead and buy used cars and cheap land in Brazil from him as well as his suspect DVDs.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 27, 2007 9:23 am ET)
             

          You are right about that, the right does bash clinton - possibly more than any other democrat president.  However, that does not take away from the fact that Clinton had many ghosts in his closet, and when you enter the political arena, everything is fair game - from the sketchy (at best) campaign donations during his run, to the "i never had sexual relations with ..." comment.  The problem is, you get caught in a lie once as a major political figure, everything you ever said will be considered lie.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by captfoster2 (October 27, 2007 9:53 am ET)
               

            "The problem is, you get caught in a lie once as a major political figure, everything you ever said will be considered lie."

            Oh, ok then ...... that sure does explain everything there is to know about Bush/Cheney and everyone that has ever or will have lied for these two..... including about 70% of the MSM

            Thanks for clearing that up MrDingy

            Report Abuse
            • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 27, 2007 10:21 am ET)
                 

              Its always typical of a liberal to take an objective topic and turn it into a personal attack.  Remember, you were the one who commented about clinton always being under attack - I just threw out one of the reasons why.

              What you are fantasizing because you want to believe everything you hear on this administration is a complete lie - they haven't been proven to be.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by clams casino (October 27, 2007 2:00 pm ET)
                   

                "[Y]ou want to believe everything you hear on this administration is a complete lie - they haven't been proven to be."

                Boy, you wingnuts sure love your logical fallacies, don't you? Once again, you're asking for proof of a negative. Look it up, try wrap your mind around the concept, and then get back to us.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (October 28, 2007 1:08 am ET)
                   

                Its always typical of a brainwashed moron like YOU MrDumbassBush  to pretend you werent doing what was obvious. Sure it was just a general statement that HAPPENED to be about Clinton. When pointed out Bush is a terrible liar himself you snivel like a little girl AS IF he didnt do the same thing you did.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by RoberttheP (October 28, 2007 7:51 am ET)
                   

                Rush tell you that?

                Report Abuse
            • Author by dangrady (October 27, 2007 11:22 am ET)
                 

              SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!

              I'm wondering why whenever the Clinton's loose money the Republicans need a Special Prosecutor to investigate an imaginery crime? I think the nation has spent enough time, and money chasing Republican ghosts of Clinton corruption.

              The next time they accuse the Clinton's of something they had better come up with something better than a dirty dress.

              Nobody is listening to what the Republican is accusing anymore, they have long since turned a deaf ear to the Fox macinations of imaginery gotcha to the "sky is falling" category.

              If this is the path the Republicans intend they are certainly doomed, so I suppose I should not complain, ney I should encourage them.

              So, I suggest those poor souls whom hold on to the Neo-Con legacy, we'll see ya in three or four decades and then we'll have a nostalgia week for you after we SAVE DEMOCRACY!

              Happy Thoughts

              Report Abuse
    • Author by Chuck Adkins (October 27, 2007 1:07 am ET)
         

      dudes a loser and a liar.

      I intend to Blog about him. 

       

      I hope MMA doesn't mind me linking to the vids...

       

      -Chuck

       

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by schtuw1271 (October 27, 2007 8:32 am ET)
         

      They take these random coincidences and make it look like the Clintons would stray from the honest and righteous path and do something in their own interest-- as if!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (October 27, 2007 12:48 pm ET)
         

      I really doubt if you'd get anything but encouraging words Chuck. Come by again.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (October 27, 2007 2:02 pm ET)
         

      Why do people in jail, committed fraud, or been convicted of felonies have the microphone handed to them and make wild unsubstantiated/phantom  accusations?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by justicetruthus8276 (October 27, 2007 2:37 pm ET)
           

        Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie

        Norman Hsu

        Johnny Chung

        Peter Paul.

        It's a pattern of corruption in fund raising that is the issue.

         

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Buzzramjet (October 28, 2007 12:09 am ET)
         

      Ya gotta love the SCOTUS which ruled recently that LYING is perfectly legal. That it is up to the listener to to discern the truth and if political figures lie, then that is their Constitutionally protected right of Free Speech WHICH INCLUDES LYING.

       What the hell has happened in this country when the SCOTUS rules that politicians can lie all they want with no problems?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bcvb1949a (October 28, 2007 2:04 am ET)
         

      Hillary Clinton is a Criminal.  You just have not found out yet.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (October 28, 2007 3:02 am ET)
           

        - bcvb1949a, give us the details. We can't all be sleeping with Dick Morris, you know.Give us the inside scoop.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (October 28, 2007 8:16 am ET)
           

        Well BC, YOU are a moron and we ALL found out.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by BreakerBaker (October 28, 2007 8:31 am ET)
         

      What's the purpose for calling this a 'purported documentary'? Why not just call it a documentary in which things are purported to be true. That is, in fact, what a documentary is. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by conleytgwinn (October 28, 2007 10:14 am ET)
           

        A documentary has some evidentiary basis - such as documentation for the claims of fact or the conclusions drawn: this piece of wish-fulfillment for the hate-wing is more in the realm of fantasy fiction - thus, purported to be that which it seems not to be.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by MickD (October 28, 2007 10:19 am ET)
             

          I get the distinct feeling that this "documentary" will get some decent press coverage (if only on Fox), while docs that give factual indictments against BushieCo ('No End in Sight') get scant coverage.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (October 28, 2007 10:35 pm ET)
           

        That is a good observation.  It looks like some defnitions of "documentary" suggest that documentaries are factual things.  Perhaps that was MMFA's point.  A subtle dig that the movie might not be factual enough to be be accurately described as a "documentary".

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wacheski3111 (October 28, 2007 9:32 pm ET)
         

      Wow you people are so partisan it hurts to watch!  How are this man's claim's bassless?  go watch the whole trailer and tell me hilly ain't caught fraudin' ,. 

      Bill was an evil presidency, . not as overt as the famous BUSH familiy of presidencies,. albeit horific none the less., the 12 years of daily bombings in Iraq for one,.  Bill has his head so far up H.W.bush's butt the saudies like him. Its all two wings of a single party.  And you kids play a silly game fighting 'against' the other 'party' ,. pathetic.  the pirate-banker class rules over the rest of us,. and we let them because we are weak,. these sad politicos are only puppets working to get PAID!!!  all your bickering R and D is silly destraction while the pirate- bankers manipulate the military-corporate fascists to make them money!   Ah yes, war is profit$

      peace. 

      Report Abuse