About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Touting O'Reilly on GMA, ABC's The Note omitted his false suggestion that Obama hasn't appeared on the show

October 29, 2007 4:14 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

103 Comments

Appearing on the October 29 broadcast of ABC's Good Morning America, Fox News host Bill O'Reilly claimed that he told Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (IL) "face to face" that "Tyra Banks [on whose syndicated talk show Obama appeared on October 1] ain't gonna get you elected, OK?" adding: "You gotta go on the Factor, you gotta go on GMA and answer the questions. What has he been doing for six months? I guess he's been at Club Med. I haven't seen him." In fact, co-host Robin Roberts interviewed Obama in New Orleans on the August 27 broadcast of Good Morning America, which co-host Diane Sawyer did not note.

The October 29 edition of The Note -- ABCNews.com's daily political newsletter -- highlighted O'Reilly's appearance on Good Morning America and quoted him as saying of Obama: "'What is his poll, 18 percent?' he said. 'What has he been doing for six months? I guess he's been on Club Med. I haven't seen him. Have you seen him?'" The Note simply omitted O'Reilly's assertion: "You gotta go on the Factor, you gotta go on GMA and answer the questions."

O'Reilly's comments, as he said them on Good Morning America:

O'REILLY: Of course not! He's a -- this is ridiculous. What is his poll, 18 percent? Look, Obama -- and I told him this, face to face -- Tyra Banks ain't gonna get you elected, OK? You gotta go on the Factor, you gotta go on GMA and answer the questions. What has he been doing for six months? I guess he's been at Club Med. I haven't seen him. Have you seen him?

O'Reilly's comments as quoted in The Note:

A piece of punditry from the other end of the spectrum: Appearing on ABC's "Good Morning America," Bill O'Reilly called it "ridiculous" to think that Obama could challenge Clinton: "What is his poll, 18 percent?" he said. "What has he been doing for six months? I guess he's been on Club Med. I haven't seen him. Have you seen him?" (He doesn't care much for the GOP field, either: "They're like B characters out of 'Dracula Has Risen From the Grave.")

From the October 29 broadcast of Good Morning America:

SAWYER: I gotta ask you about politics before you go here.

O'REILLY: Sure.

SAWYER: All right, this is "Take Down Hillary Week," I believe. Isn't it, George [Stephanopoulos, host of ABC's This Week]?

O'REILLY: Who's taking down Hillary?

SAWYER: It's take down --

O'REILLY: You doing that, Stephanopoulos, you traitor? Is he doing that? I'll slap him.

SAWYER: No, no, out there. Out there on the campaign trail. All the --

O'REILLY: Who's taking down Hillary? I'm outraged.

SAWYER: Obama, Edwards, they're all going after --

O'REILLY: Oh, the Democrats!

SAWYER: So can Obama, this week, turn it around? Does he have another round in him?

O'REILLY: Of course not! He's a -- this is ridiculous. What is his poll, 18 percent? Look, Obama -- and I told him this, face to face -- Tyra Banks ain't gonna get you elected, OK? You gotta go on the Factor, you gotta go on GMA and answer the questions. What has he been doing for six months? I guess he's been at Club Med. I haven't seen him. Have you seen him?

SAWYER: Let me ask you about the Republicans. Forty-one percent -- you quote this -- 41 percent of Americans can't name a Republican candidate.

O'REILLY: I know, 41 percent of Americans can't name a Republican because they're so exciting, Diane. These guys are so exciting, aren't they?

From the August 27 broadcast of Good Morning America:

BILL WEIR (co-host): Six billion dollars in federal aid has gone to cleanup and rebuilding, 256 miles of that city's floodwall system is now working, but they have another 100 miles to rebuild. And only about 7 percent of the residents in the devastated Lower Ninth Ward have come home. Less than 1,000 people in that neighborhood. Robin Roberts is in the Crescent City this morning for an exclusive interview with one of those presidential hopefuls, Senator Barack Obama. Robin, good morning.

ROBERTS: I'm here in New Orleans, Bill, a prime stop for presidential candidates from both parties, bringing promises of a better future for those still struggling two years after Katrina. They're here in an attempt to connect with voters but also to point out the Bush administration's shortcomings in fixing many problems that still exist, like those being forced to still live in trailers. I sat down with Barack Obama in one of the few homes rebuilt in this neighborhood and he told me about his own plan to rebuild the Gulf Coast.

OBAMA: We've got to get the -- the levees and the pumping stations working. But we also have to rebuild the wetlands and the marshes around the coast. We've got to rebuild our infrastructure. And so I want the federal government to focus on building police forces here. President Bill Clinton had a COPS [Community Oriented Policing Services] program that put 100,000 new police on the streets. We think we should at least have a focused program right here in New Orleans. We want to make sure that we've got additional moneys to attract doctors and nurses. And the same goes for our education system. We want to make sure that we're providing more money to attract teachers to come into this region. And then finally, just fixing the FEMA bureaucracy, making sure that applications take no more than two months to actually be processed and to get an answer back to homeowners.

ROBERTS: How do you go about doing that?

OBAMA: Some of it is just a function of who's in charge. And one of the things that we proposed is the FEMA director should be independent, should have a six-year term like the FBI director, not subject to politics, reporting directly to the president on this reconstruction process.

ROBERTS: Does that really change anything? And is it, is it better, perhaps, just to start from scratch where FEMA is concerned?

OBAMA: What we know is FEMA has worked in the past because it was independent, because it was managed by somebody who actually understood emergency management. And part of what I think the next president is going to have to do is to re-inspire a new generation of civil servants who wanna get into the federal government. And so we're gonna have to do some restoration in rebuilding that agency, in part because there's no reason to assume that this is the last controversy that we're -- or catastrophe that we're gonna be dealing with in the years to come.

ROBERTS: Also part of your plan, calling on the insurance companies --

OBAMA: Mm-hmm.

ROBERTS: -- to play a part when there's a catastrophe of some sort.

OBAMA: Yeah. Homeowners can't get help - get home insurance that is affordable. So what we've proposed is to have a catastrophic insurance component, a national catastrophic insurance reserve that is paid for in part by fees charged to the insurance companies that caps the kind of exposure that any single homeowner can have.

ROBERTS: This fund, in essence, a goodwill fund.

OBAMA: Yeah.

ROBERTS: And a lot of people are gonna say, "Well, Senator Obama, the insurance company, they have laid many roadblocks," many people think --

OBAMA: Mm-hmm.

ROBERTS: -- in this recovery role. Is it realistic to think that they would be a part of something like this?

OBAMA: I think it's fair given the extraordinary profits that the insurance companies have been mounting over the years to say, "You've got to be a part of this, this process of solving this problem." Insurance can't just be a profit-making machine where they don't have to pay. And when you finally have to pay, they walk away.

ROBERTS: But that's how it's been. How can you change that?

OBAMA: Well, I, I think you change it by having a president and a Congress that takes this problem seriously, that sits down with the insurance companies and says, "We believe in you making a profit, and we believe in the market, and we believe in insurance. But what we're not gonna allow you to do is to simply cherry-pick those profitable lines of business and not get involved when people desperately need insurance."

ROBERTS: And late last week, Senator Clinton made a remark that raised a lot of eyebrows.

CLINTON [video clip]: But if certain things happen between now and the election, particularly with respect to terrorism, that will automatically give the Republicans an advantage again no matter how badly they have mishandled it, no matter how much more dangerous they have made the world. And so I think I'm the best of the Democrats to deal with that.

ROBERTS: How do you feel about what she said?

OBAMA: Everybody in America is committed to preventing terrorism from happening. That's not a partisan issue. And I don't think that there's room in this campaign or any campaign to use terrorism as a club to beat opponents over the head with. You know, Karl Rove and this administration perfected that politics of fear. And I think that part of what we wanna see is a -- is a change from that approach to one that says, "We're unified in making sure that America is secure." And that's how I'm gonna approach this campaign.

ROBERTS: And you just recently said you would reach out to Republicans, that there are some key --

OBAMA: Mm-hmm.

ROBERTS: -- Republicans that you would bring in and want to work with.

OBAMA: Absolutely. Well, you know, there are people like Chuck Hagel from Nebraska, Dick Lugar from Indiana, John Warner from Virginia, who are very capable, smart people. I don't agree with them on every issue. But they do come out of a tradition that has been lost, and that is that foreign policy, you know, is one of those areas that shouldn't be subject to partisan politics, that our differences should end at the water's edge.

ROBERTS: And this week, there will be no fewer than five presidential candidates traveling to this region. We will continue our reports throughout the week. And on Wednesday, we'll be on the Mississippi Gulf Coast to see where things stand two years later. Bill?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Gen. Petraeus (October 29, 2007 4:17 pm ET)
         

      He threw in "and GMA" because he wanted the host to approve of what he was saying.  in oreilly speak he really just means "wah wah obama wont come on my show because he knows im biased and i wont lob him the same softballs i lob giuliani. wah wah im a gop neocon hack and yet i am mad that anyone sees through me"

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Gen. Petraeus (October 29, 2007 4:20 pm ET)
           

        so my point is that this is a non-issue and really shouldnt be here since oreilly really didnt mean for barack to go on gma, he just threw it in their to cover his whining

        Report Abuse
        • Author by SFnomad (October 29, 2007 4:22 pm ET)
             

          But it's just more conservative mis-information ... even if Billdo doesn't care about the mis-information he gave.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by therick (October 29, 2007 4:47 pm ET)
               

            Maybe BillO will be Keith Olbermans WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD ! ! !

            I hope so, I so love when Keith does that shtick!

             

            Report Abuse
          • Author by stevensm (October 29, 2007 9:26 pm ET)
               

            O'Reilly to Obama: "...you gotta go on GMA ..."

            MM to the world: "Robin Roberts interviewed Obama in New Orleans on the August 27 broadcast of Good Morning America"

            Looks like O'Reilly and his "crack team of researchers" didn't do their homework. How embarrassing.

            Oh, by the way, BillO, Tyra has better demo ratings that YOU do. Spin that.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by Sueelldd (October 29, 2007 4:19 pm ET)
         

      Well I Guess tonight Keith Olbermann will name him Worst Person in the World for this. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (October 29, 2007 4:39 pm ET)
           

        I, for one, certainly want to thank you for comin’ on the thread and sharing with us another MMFA | Olbermann nugget of pure gold, SUEELD.  Please feel free to come back onto the thread tomorrow and admit you were wrong.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Sueelldd (October 29, 2007 4:41 pm ET)
             

          Well I hope I am wrong, there are far "Worse" people in the world than Bill O'Reilly on GMA.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Governor (October 30, 2007 7:24 am ET)
               

            My apologies for my incorrect and overstated sarcasm, Sueeld.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Sueelldd (October 30, 2007 9:20 am ET)
                 

              I was hoping you would be correct, I accept your apology. I was also hoping that Olby would just for one week not use MMFA material in his comedy bit. I was wrong.  I guess when you can not do your own research you have no choice but to use MMFA.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (October 30, 2007 10:51 am ET)
                   

                "I guess when you can not do your own research you have no choice but to use MMFA."

                Perhaps, but let's fill in a few blanks to put it into perspective: 

                I guess when you are given a staff budget by your network and that budget doesn't come close to the cost of hiring an army of researchers to watch TV and listen to the radio all day just for the sake of a 2-minute chunk of cable news airtime, I guess the choice becomes clear:  Put your limited staff to work on the top stories of the day first, then, if needed, look to other sources for your throwaway segments.

                Report Abuse
    • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (October 29, 2007 4:24 pm ET)
         

      LOL

      Bill never let a little thing like 'facts' stand in his way of thinking.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Governor (October 29, 2007 4:50 pm ET)
         

      By the way, he was on GMA this morning to complain about kids in baggy pants having access to birth control.  The misinformation about Obama probably just fell out on his mouth completely unplanned like his morning oatmeal.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (October 29, 2007 4:53 pm ET)
           

        fell out of his mouth completely unplanned… like words from my keyboard.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by achrispage6992 (October 29, 2007 5:01 pm ET)
         

      The really pitiful thing about this whole charade is that O'Reilly actually believes that his 2.1 million viewers can actually sway an election. The reality is that most of his audience is old and set in thier ways and in the GOP camp already. I get so tired of this man's self aggrandizing. The plain and simple truth is that he is a cowardly, perverted, and narcissistic person. I would challenge any of his supporters to prove otherwise.  

      Report Abuse
      • Author by sundog (October 29, 2007 11:59 pm ET)
           

        Exactly Chrisp, one wonders just how many Democratic primary voters watch his show on a regular basis. I'm thinking more of that demographic have now heard O'reilly's dumb remark right here than did originally on his show.

        All he is doing here is giving the clue to destroying FOX as an influence in society. People who understand who they are should stop going on the network! It just legitimizes FOX to have the 'opposition' show up and try to argue sense into them. It's not just a tilted playing field, it doesn't even exist in this dimension. So quit giving the damn interviews! They are irrelevant so let them bellow to a shrinking audience while they just..circle...each....other.....down......the....... drain

        Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (October 29, 2007 5:05 pm ET)
         

      What is the point of this anyway?  So, The Note left out O'Reilly's comments about his show, or GMA - so what?  It's hardly some crucial omission to the point he was making about Obama's selective media choices.

      Sometimes this website's obsession with anything that comes out of O'Reilly's mouth is a little ridiculous. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (October 29, 2007 5:13 pm ET)
           

        This morning, Bill O'Reilly was on GMA.  He claimed that Obama needed to get on GMA and come out of hiding.  Obama was on GMA on August 27. O'Reilly's misinformation is being cleaned up by MMFA.  That GMA chose to use the delete key matters little to me.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:19 pm ET)
             

          Maybe they used the delete key to try to get Obama to come back on the show....perhaps no one found it worth watching the first time.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (October 29, 2007 5:26 pm ET)
           

        Tommy,

        That is possible, but the broader point, in my opinion, is that O'Reilly is the poster boy of conservative misinformation. He spouts it, uses it, and regurgitates it to his audience. He does this while disingeniously claiming to be an independent. He actually claims that he is as hard on the Republicans as he is the "loony left" as he calls them. It is not a fixation on every word he utters, the man deserves to be scrutinized and I for one am glad MMFA and people like Olbermann take him to task for the smallest of things. The pervert deserves everything he gets. Anyone else in is postition who did what he did would be fired for sexually harassing a subordinate. Marginalize O'Reilly in anyway possible, that is what I say.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (October 29, 2007 5:47 pm ET)
             

          Chris,

          You make good points, although O'Reilly said he should appear on GMA even though he already had - I don't see where The Note's omission of that was some big deal.

          It was a minor point in O'Reilly's assertion that Obama should go on more serious venues than Tyra Banks' show, for example........but let's face it, Clinton hangs with the gals on The View - Giuliani sits for a cozy chat with Hannity.....none of them like tough venues, that's obvious.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (October 29, 2007 9:13 pm ET)
               

            I agree with you in general, tommy.  I think Obama shouldn't go on O'Reilly's show, because O'Reilly isn't a fair interviewer.  However, Obama should go on shows where the interviewers are more holstile and/or confrontational at least.  I think Obama would do great in an unfriendly atmosphere as long as the interviewer is fair and doesn't use his microphone to bad-mouth people for days after the interview without the interviewee there to defend his/herself like O'Reilly has done repeatedly.  As for O'Reilly, he has shown he can't handle being a big boy on these interviews so I don't blame anyone for not giving him the time of day.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (October 30, 2007 11:27 am ET)
                 

              Open,

              Maybe I've missed it, and I am no fan of O'Reilly's - but I haven't seen him interview someone and then bad mouth that person on air or distort what he or she said afterwards? O'Reilly may be beligerant, but I feel candidates, especially presidential ones, need to learn how to handle uncomfortable questioners and interviews, even unfair ones......they should be equipped to expose blatantly biased and unfair questions and grilling right back at the interviewer.

              I, for one, am tired of squishy feel good "Oprah-esque" bantering softball interviews that these staged, rehearsed candidates opt for all the time.  We deserve more.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by open_mind (October 30, 2007 2:22 pm ET)
                   

                This is O'Reilly smearing Chris Dodd after Chris Dodd was kind enough to come on his show:

                "Later that day, O'Reilly re-aired the Dodd interview on Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor. Afterward, he said that he is "always disappointed when people come on with propaganda like Senator Dodd did," and asserted that Dodd "obviously didn't know what I said about Al Qaeda in San Francisco." O'Reilly's then replayed his August 1 interview with comedian Dennis Miller, who said he was "a little disappointed" that O'Reilly "would give a hack like that a toe hold" by hosting him on his cable show, adding, "I must tell you as a viewer of the Factor, I don't need to hear from hacks like Chris Dodd." O'Reilly later declared that Dodd had gotten "smacked right back" and said, "I didn't like to do that to a sitting senator, I have to tell the audience. It does not give me pleasure, but I certainly have to do it."

                "O'Reilly concluded that he "didn't know [Dodd] was going to be dishonest" and claimed that Dodd had "pandered ... so he could get an 'atta boy' when he goes into this hateful thing over the weekend." Miller replied, "You know something? ... That convention is a loser fest. I mean, there are hookers who have put an embargo on that convention."

                http://mediamatters.org/items/200708030008

                If O'Reilly is going to smear you after you do an interview with him and he has the mic all to himself then there isn't much incentive to do one with him and I don't blame anyone for ignoring O'Reilly.  I am all for tough questions, but O'Reilly is observably not fair on top of that.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (October 30, 2007 2:43 pm ET)
                     

                  Yeah, I forgot about the Dodd interview, you're right.  O'Reilly is an ego driven blowhard, I could care less whether they do his program or not.  I am just speaking generally in this day and age of soft interview and puffy venues. 

                  Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (October 29, 2007 5:27 pm ET)
           

        the point tommy is that o'reilly implied obama has been hiding "for six months".  he hasn't. he was on the today show sept. 12.  if you fail to see the point, it's because you're not interested in seeing it.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:32 pm ET)
             

          I see the point, and sure it was technically a false statement.  I guess it would have been different if he said "he should come on the Factor" or something. 

          But on a more serious note than where has Obama been hiding (because he kind of has, im comparison to the other big candidates on both sides) - he answers questions like: whats on your ipod, do you want to clean up rap music?  Seriously, is this Ice Cube running for president?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mefirst (October 29, 2007 5:44 pm ET)
               

            so he hasn't been asked any serious questions?  maybe you could answer me one.  what's it like to be no more useful than a boil on the ass of humanity?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:50 pm ET)
                 

              Id say it would be the equivalent of Barack Obama running for presidency.  Or equivalent to the stink that pours out of Dingy Reid & Barbara Boxers mouths.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by mefirst (October 29, 2007 6:06 pm ET)
                   

                are you going to be around for awhile?  my guess is you won't be here long, at least under this name.  there's so many of you who just don't have what it takes to post under one name. 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 6:15 pm ET)
                     

                  Actually this is my first and only name.  Only been posting on here for about 2-3 days.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mefirst (October 29, 2007 7:03 pm ET)
                       

                    so a month from now, i won't be saying what happened to marlboroman, or dogrun?  it's just odd that some many of you guys are all over these threads for a couple weeks and then "disappear". 

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by mefirst (October 29, 2007 7:04 pm ET)
                         

                      so many

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 7:37 pm ET)
                           

                        No, i only go online when im bored to begin with.  In fact, i honestly just like reading the looney material on here written by MM.  90% of the material on here is to personally attack a single person based on speech taken out of context, or pieces of media that are incorrect but have no effect at all on whether you are going to get any sleep at night or not.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by mefirst (October 29, 2007 8:00 pm ET)
                             

                          ok, just playing the odds, your 90%, what is taken out of context on this particular article?

                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 8:36 pm ET)
                             

                          You are a liar and a fool. You were TOLD to believe that as a loyal member of the Limborg. Anyone actually reading this site knows that is an outright lie.

                          Report Abuse
          • Author by fawltylogic (October 29, 2007 5:52 pm ET)
               

            I guess you missed his appearances on "The Tonight Show" and "The Daily Show". Even though those two shows are entertainment, I bet Obama answered questions more relevant to his politics than he would be allowed to on "The O'Reilly Factor".

            Report Abuse
          • Author by robrob (October 29, 2007 6:26 pm ET)
               

            "I see the point, and sure it was technically a false statement."

             And if a liberal pundit had made a similar "technically false" statement you'd have been just as forgiving to them, right?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 6:38 pm ET)
                 

              To be honest, I wouldn't care....unless they got called out on it and tried a smear in return....as in the case of Rush Limbaugh.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 7:33 pm ET)
                   

                You mean like when Rush smeared the soldiers that didnt agree with him about Iraq then when called on it tried to lie his way out of it? Yeah, I agree.

                Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 7:29 pm ET)
               

            Technically a false statement? How about OBVIOUSLY AND TOTALLY a false statement.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by SFnomad (October 29, 2007 5:28 pm ET)
           

        The most ridiculous item of the day is the obsession with MMFA's so-called obsessions.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (October 29, 2007 7:20 pm ET)
           

        How do you feel about the recent, conservative missinformation about fellow conservatives thing?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:14 pm ET)
         

      But we also have to rebuild the wetlands and the marshes around the coast.

      All this complaining by the democratic party on how poorly the Katrina situation was handled, that hardly any of the people are moved back into the city, etc, etc.  But what is one of the main things we have to do?  Rebuild the wetlands & marshes!  That will help the people get back on their feet!  Nothing like more swamp!  If anything, it will rebuild the gators lives!

      No wonder they elected a republican governor.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (October 29, 2007 5:15 pm ET)
         

      "What has he been doing for six months?"

      NBC News with Brian Williams

      The New York Times

      The Daily Show

      NPR

      Vibe

      The Washington Post 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:18 pm ET)
           

        So basically hes too busy to do anything substantial because his schedule is so booked with Tyra Banks, Myspace voting, and Vibe? 

        The hardest question Obama has answered to date: So everyone really wants to know, whats on your ipod?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (October 29, 2007 5:31 pm ET)
             

          Define "something substantial".

          Do you mean going on the O'Reilly Factor?  A program that, like all other cable news shows, fights for what's left of the basic cable audience crumbs?

          BTW, Vibe Magazine circulation: 850,000 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:36 pm ET)
               

            And im sure those 850,000 rap lovers were craving answers for what Obamas view on rap music was, and what song by Jay-Z is on his ipod! 

            Maybe next, he'll do an interview in High Times about what his interpretation of "sticky green" is....

            Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (October 29, 2007 5:42 pm ET)
                 

              A huge portion of 850,000 rap lovers also VOTE.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:44 pm ET)
                   

                Well, considering that their lyrics are not in the english language what so ever...my guess is those 850,000 that vote, are voting in florida...

                Report Abuse
                • Author by friedbergboy1422 (October 29, 2007 7:36 pm ET)
                     

                  Stereotype much?  Geez!  Marlboro, if we are such "pantywaists," why do you enjoy spending time with us?

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 7:40 pm ET)
                       

                    I thoroughly enjoy the looney material you guys write.  It leaves me begging for more and more while asking myself "where do these people come up with this s***?".  Perhaps its all that global warming effecting your minds...

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by solon (October 30, 2007 1:40 am ET)
                         

                      At least we have minds which is a lot more than can be said of you Marching Morons of the hive

                      Report Abuse
                • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 7:40 pm ET)
                     

                  Considering you have no ability for higher brain function and are more worthless than Bush at a Mensa meeting what YOU think about rap music is meaningless to THIS or any other discussion.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 7:42 pm ET)
                       

                    rap music blows.  it may as well be written by illegal immigrants because no one can understand what language they are speaking.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 8:38 pm ET)
                         

                      Just because YOU are too stupid to understand something doesnt mean no one is.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 8:39 pm ET)
                         

                       OOOPS should read Just because YOU are too stupid to understand something doesnt mean no one understands it.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by lapsedlawyer (October 30, 2007 4:53 am ET)
                         

                      Nice!  A racist and a xenophobe!  Could go for the hat trick if you add a sexist remark!

                      Typical of the Freeperville Fools!

                      Report Abuse
                • Author by political_left-religious_right (October 30, 2007 9:45 am ET)
                     

                  The ugly effects of tobacco use?

                  Well, considering that their lyrics are not in the english language what so ever...my guess is those 850,000 that vote, are voting in florida...

                  "English" and "Florida" need to be capitalized, and "whatsoever" is one word, not three.  Also, the first ellipsis needs a space after it.

                  Shall we move on to the errors in logic as well, or is it worth the time to point out even more of your deficiencies?

                  Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 7:38 pm ET)
                 

              You dont have to try so hard to prove you are an ignorant propagandist. That is already accomplished. Nothing worthwhile to say, no points, juvenile sniping and astonishing ignorance. Your bridge is calling troll.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:38 pm ET)
               

            And if Fox gets only "crumbs", then why do the democrats see it as such a threat? 

            Or maybe its a blind defense for only getting the crumbs on radio....

            Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (October 29, 2007 5:41 pm ET)
                 

              Do they see Fox News as a threat?

              They had no problem ditching the Fox debate.

              Obama doesn't seem to have a problem shunning them after all the lies and smears Fox News has flung at him since he announced his candidacy. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:43 pm ET)
                   

                Or is it that he's afraid to answer a question about his name signed on the Dingy Reid letter!

                 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 7:41 pm ET)
                     

                  No one is afraid of Fox. However since they are nothing but a propaganda outfit. They shouldnt be treated as if they were legitimate. They after all produce ignorant hivemind morons like YOU. 

                  Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 7:37 pm ET)
             

          You are a liar and a fool. A complete troll with no interest in really discussing anything. Tyra Banks? If the New York Times and the Washington Post with dozens of pulitzers between them are not substantial to you that is because you are a moron.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 7:51 pm ET)
               

            NYT is hardly anything to brag about.  Gore also won a major prize....but that doesnt make him anything more than a liar & hypocrite with an overwhelming skill to brainwash the left side morons who believe everything they read in the liberal media.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 8:43 pm ET)
                 

              So then the entire world except you Limborg hiveminders are brainwashed. The Nobel Prize Comittee the Academy Award comittee. YOU are the moron. Not the entire rest of the world. Just because YOU dont know what you believe until you are TOLD what to believe doesnt mean the rest of us dont think for ourselves. You are stupid and have no credibility. So far your posts have only been useful to laugh at. Its hard to believe anyone can be so ignorant and still remember to breathe.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 8:54 pm ET)
                   

                Thanks for reminding me, my face was turning red from not breathing....

                Report Abuse
                • Author by lapsedlawyer (October 30, 2007 4:56 am ET)
                     

                  Dammit, Solon, we were almost rid of him and you go and tell him to breathe!

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (October 29, 2007 7:35 pm ET)
         

      Somehow I doubt if it preys on his mind at all.

      Fox has no interest in giving a "liberal" a neutral open forum, never has. Ego no reason to go there.

      You want some real controversy over Obama. Check out firedoglake. You'd probably approve of what they they say,but for the wrong reasons.

      In short he and the country's gay population may have some issues.

      And thank you for acknowledging the emerging progressive talk radio folks. Air America is going backwards and forwards a bit. The other two networks see an expanding market.

      Now time for a gratuitus marketing forces comment.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 7:46 pm ET)
           

        Nah, ill save you the free market open airwaves speech.  You know as well as i do that the liberal left cannot compete on radio.

        But its an accomplisment that Barack has the black & gay vote?  Of course he does - we hate homos, and blacks want to praise a group of 6 kids who beat up a white kid.  I hardly call that an accomplishment.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (October 29, 2007 8:45 pm ET)
             

          You mean you will save it since I already BLEW IT OUT OF THE WATER once? I doubt liberals will ever support the preaching to the choir radio hatemonger thing. We like to read and find things out for ourselves so the hivemind hero worship thing is probably all yours. That still doesnt change the FACT that the airwaves belong to us and there is NO first amendment free speech argument involved in the fairness doctrine.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by ajwan (October 30, 2007 12:20 pm ET)
             

          We know you hate homos but you sure love that homo sex, dontcha ya?

          Since this was your last post of the day here, must be a needin' to go back and review your "How to tie an effective noose" literature.

          Ok, but don't forget to put out those cigarettes before you fall asleep on the couch.

           

          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (October 29, 2007 8:49 pm ET)
         

      Your statement qualifies, well within the perameters. Me I'd have some concern in the media. Stockholders present and future can easyily sue their companies leadership, if they feel that they are not making money from a huge potential market. The 70+ percent of us that want out of Iraq, you think they're ok with 87% going, Iraq war good, President-for-life is not reward enough, for all that shrub has benificently given us radio?

      Your second paragraph would indicate a certain sloth inyour investigative efforts. Could be worse. I see you got deleted elsewhere. If you open up on the race issue again, it could happen again. A clear look at the evicence would show that you give a finger bones worth of information about a skeleton.  

      Report Abuse
    • Author by listenup (October 29, 2007 8:52 pm ET)
         

      "Look, Obama -- and I told him this, face to face -- Tyra Banks ain't gonna get you elected, OK?" "What has he been doing for six months?" "I haven't seen him."Obama was on Tyra Banks end of Sep. '07 

      B.O. truly is a pathological liar.

      Just of few of MANY. MANY:

      ""I'm here (in Ireland) to receive a big award from Trinity College." He was there to speak at Trinity College and did not receive any award.

      "The FBI told me, and others, at Fox,  that we were on an Al Queda hit list." Denied by an FBI agent in NY and never substantiated by anyone else at Fox.

       "There's no difference between the KKK and the Nazis, who have websites,than (sic) the Daily Kos."

      http://www.sweetjesusihatebilloreilly.com/archive/102407.html

      A complete list would fill a book.

      No one can deny B.O. is a liar, w/o lieing.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (October 30, 2007 12:44 pm ET)
           

        Anyone else get a real Michael Scott vibe from O'Reilly? I could see O'Reilly putting up a plaque in his office that he is the proud owner of a genuine Seyko watch.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (October 29, 2007 9:32 pm ET)
         

      Above for the Marlboro drone.

      Mr. F, I'm sure your name has some significence. I remember when Rush first appeared on the radio. A co-worker liked to listen to him and systmaticaly refute any thing he would say. It wasn't hard. I understood later how any competent liberal voice was never allowed. Clue, market forces had little to do with it. Rush is not you by any definition. But he does understand how to play you like a ten buck guitar.

      Check the 2006 election results. Check the 17+ national legislative people, all GOPpers, who've decided to retire from politics, in the last six months. Crush us you did not. Deeply hurt this country and any snot nosed foreigner you could, yes.

      Niether my folks home nor mine has a basement. What are they like these days? Gay porn has no thrills for me. I do know it can be dangeous to get between a wingnut and the gay section at the local Porn-Co.

      Show some evidence that you do think for yourself. Evidence so far shows some soiled neocon talking points and naught else. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rafaelblock (October 30, 2007 12:15 am ET)
         

      O'Reilly went on national television and lied through his teeth. Is it only news because he did this on a show besides his own? or am I missing something here...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by FNC Liberal (October 30, 2007 3:53 am ET)
         

      Bill, Bill be honest with the folks here. If Tyra Banks personally asked you to be a guest on her show, you would be there in a heart beat. Bill loves the ladies and wouldn't turn down an offer to be with one. People in this business know all about you, Bill.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by GotKids (October 30, 2007 11:10 am ET)
         

      Of the Democratic presidentil candidates, Obama, in my opinion, poses a significant threat to the movement conservative machine. Soooo....here come the Little Lies. "Little Lies [that] aren't meant to have staying power. Instead, they create a sort of background hum, a sense that the person facing all these accusations must have done something wrong" (Paul Krugman, NYT) ABC News and O'Reilly have conspired to begin the background hum. The fake FEMA news briefing was no more a rouge operation than was this interview.

      The Right Wing Spin Machine has shown its' hand. They would love to run against HRC. The could levitate every authoritarian follower off their  Burca and into the voting booth, no problem. Throw that in with a national ID requirement for voting in the 2008 election and the Rupubs have a decent shot at winning. (And they'll tell us it was the "National Defense" voters who delivered it for Rudy, to-boot)

      I am beginnning to see the light. Thanks MMFA.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.