About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Situation Room played up McCain attacks on Clinton over earmark, but didn't note his missed vote

October 29, 2007 4:47 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: CNN's The Situation Room has reported several times on Sen. John McCain's attacks on Sen. Hillary Clinton's support for a $1 million earmark for a museum at the site of the original 1969 Woodstock music festival. But in none of its reports did CNN note that, although McCain is listed as a co-sponsor of the amendment to remove the funding for the museum, he missed the vote on the earmark.

25 Comments

The October 22, 25, and 26 editions of CNN's The Situation Room included reports on Sen. John McCain's (R-AZ) attacks on Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-NY) support for a $1 million earmark for a museum at the Bethel Woods [NY] Center for the Arts, which, according to its website, is "at the site of the original 1969 Woodstock Festival." But in none of its reports did CNN note that although McCain is listed as a co-sponsor of the amendment to remove the funding for the Bethel Performing Arts Center, as The Washington Post noted, he "missed the vote on the earmark."

McCain was one of six senators to miss the vote to "table" -- or kill -- the amendment to remove the earmark. The motion to table the amendment failed by a vote of 52-42, and the Senate subsequently passed the amendment by unanimous consent. The McCain campaign website states that McCain had a town hall meeting scheduled in Greenville, South Carolina, at noon on October 18, the same day as the 3:37 p.m. ET motion to table.

The Washington Post reports that McCain has missed more votes than any other senator except Tim Johnson (D-SD), who spent months in the hospital and recuperating following a brain hemorrhage.

The Situation Room included three reports on McCain's attacks on Clinton without noting that McCain missed the vote on the earmark:

  • On October 22, CNN congressional correspondent Dana Bash noted that "McCain attacked Clinton for trying to spend a million dollars on a Woodstock museum" and aired the clip of McCain's comments about Woodstock at the October 21 Fox News-sponsored presidential debate: "Now, my friends, I wasn't there. I'm sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event. I was -- I was tied up at the time."
  • On October 25, host Wolf Blitzer said that "John McCain is using a new presidential campaign ad to draw contrast between himself and Democrat Hillary Clinton. The spot pokes fun at Clinton's support for a plan to spend $1 million to build a museum at the site of the 1969 Woodstock rock festival in New York State" while video from McCain's advertisement played behind Blitzer. Blitzer said that "[t]hat proposal was since scrapped," but did not note that McCain missed the vote.
  • On October 26, CNN senior political analyst Bill Schneider aired a clip of McCain attacking the earmark at the Fox News debate, and then added that "[t]he line worked so well, his campaign has turned it into a commercial, now running in New Hampshire." Schneider then showed video from McCain's campaign commercial -- the clip from the debate that Schneider had just aired. Moments later, Schneider said that McCain had "[q]uite a formula for winning over conservatives -- highlight your service, attack Hillary Clinton, and draw sharp contrasts between the '60s counterculture and his own dramatically different experience of the '60s. And maybe that will get McCain some R-E-S-P-E-C-T."

In her October 18 Situation Room report on the Bethel Woods earmark, Bash asserted that the removal of the $1 million earmark was a "big victory" for Republicans. Bash also asserted that Woodstock is a "liberal mecca." Washington Post staff writer Joel Achenbach, reporting on the controversy over the earmark in an October 27 article, wrote: "In this rural area, the project is seen as crucial to the economic recovery of a region hammered by the closing of once-popular Borscht Belt tourist resorts."

On October 25, The Washington Post reported in its "In the Loop" column that at a lunch at the National Republican Senatorial Committee headquarters, "[a]ttendees watched a highlights reel of unfavorable news clips about Democrats, including one that brought down the house. It was CNN's report on the vote to strip a $1 million earmark for a museum honoring the Woodstock music festival, a provision that was sought by Clinton and Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.). We're told [Vice President Dick] Cheney watched with a belly laugh."

From the October 26 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: As Senator John McCain attempts to jump-start his campaign, he's managing to get in his own digs at Hillary Clinton. Let's bring in our senior political analyst, Bill Schneider, our senior political correspondent, Candy Crowley. They're both here. We got a lot to assess. Let's start with you, Bill, first of all. On John McCain, he's trying, obviously, to make a comeback.

SCHNEIDER: He is, and he's doing it by trying to contrast two very different images of the 1960s.

[begin video clip]

SCHNEIDER: On Friday, John McCain commemorated the 40th anniversary of the day he was shot down over Hanoi and captured.

McCAIN [video clip]: Many years ago on this day, I was able to intercept a surface-to-air missile with my own airplane.

SCHNEIDER: And spent the next five and a half years as a prisoner of war, refusing to accept early release until those who were captured ahead of him were freed.

McCAIN [video clip]: I came out of the Vietnamese, quote, "hospital" in very bad condition.

SCHNEIDER: This summer, McCain's presidential campaign had its own near-death experience when it almost ran out of money. He needs to bring back the McCain of 2000, starting with the image that first brought him national prominence: service and sacrifice.

McCAIN [video clip]: In case you missed it, a few days ago Senator Clinton tried to spend $1 million on the Woodstock concert museum. Now, my friends, I wasn't there. I'm sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event. I was -- I was tied up at the time. But the fact is -- but the fact is --

SCHNEIDER: The line worked so well, his campaign has turned it into a commercial, now running in New Hampshire.

McCAIN [video clip]: Now, my friends, I wasn't there. I'm sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event. I was -- I was tied up at the time.

SCHNEIDER: McCain is hoping to turn things around, using what might be called the Aretha Franklin method.

McCAIN [video clip]: And I don't think you can fool the American people. I think the first thing you need is their respect, and I intend to earn their respect.

[end video clip]

SCHNEIDER: Quite a formula for winning over conservatives -- highlight your service, attack Hillary Clinton, and draw sharp contrasts between the '60s counterculture and his own dramatically different experience of the '60s. And maybe that will get McCain some R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

BLITZER: All right. That would be respect.

SCHNEIDER: Yes.

From the October 25 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: On our "Political Ticker" this Thursday: Republican John McCain is using a new presidential campaign ad to draw contrast between himself and Democrat Hillary Clinton. The spot pokes fun at Clinton's support for a plan to spend $1 million to build a museum at the site of the 1969 Woodstock rock festival in New York State.

That proposal was since scrapped. McCain notes that, during Woodstock, he was a prisoner of war in Vietnam. The ad starts airing today in New Hampshire.

From the October 22 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BASH: John McCain attacked Clinton for trying to spend a million dollars on a Woodstock museum and used it as a reminder of his '60s experience, as a Vietnam POW.

McCAIN [video clip]: Now, my friends, I wasn't there. I'm sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event. I was -- I was tied up at the time.

BASH: This was [former Sen.] Fred Thompson's [R-TN] second debate, and he got the most pointed question about why he doesn't campaign more and criticism that he's lazy.

From the October 18 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: All of us old enough to remember Woodstock know it was much more than an outdoor rock concert. It was an event that helped define the so-called "hippie generation." Now Republicans are using it to try to define Senator Hillary Clinton and her presidential campaign -- at issue, whether creating a Woodstock museum is any way to spend Americans' money. Let's go to our congressional correspondent Dana Bash. She's watching this story for us. All right, Dana, what's going on here?

BASH: Well, there was just a vote. And Republicans had a big victory, because the Senate just voted to eliminate what Republicans call Hillary Clinton's taxpayer-funded Woodstock flashback.

[begin video clip]

[clip of Jimi Hendrix performing "Purple Haze"]

BASH: Woodstock, an event and images that define a generation. New York senators Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer want to spend one million taxpayer dollars to preserve these memories and others from the '60s in a museum. It's a million-dollar earmark tucked into a health spending bill. And Republicans are crying foul.

SEN. TOM COBURN (R-OK) [video clip]: I'm part of the hippie generation, but the question is -- is should this be a priority for this body, over the priority of women and children?

SEN. JON KYL (R-AZ) [video clip]: Gather your groovy beads, and we will see you on the lawn for a trip down memory lane. Well, a trip down memory lane be -- may be just fine for folks. I suggest if they want to participate in that, they can pay the admission price.

BASH: Republicans privately admit they're making an issue of the Woodstock earmark to go after presidential contender Hillary Clinton, to hit her for misplaced priorities and link her to a liberal mecca. Clinton was in Washington, but did not take the floor to defend her earmark, saying only through a spokesman, "Senators Schumer and Clinton have worked hard to promote economic development and tourism in Upstate New York."

SCHUMER [video clip]: It's the right type of earmark.

BASH: Clinton left the battle to her colleague from New York. Schumer adamantly defended the project, calling it a job generator for his state.

SCHUMER [video clip]: I'm proud to do it. I spent some time doing it. I'm going to continue to do it. I think it's part of my job.

BASH: The museum is also getting state and private dollars. Backers insist it's not just a monument to hippies, but a place to learn about a tumultuous decade.

[end video clip]

BASH: Now, again, the Senate did just vote to eliminate this program. It is highly unusual for senators to kill each other's pet projects, but, at the end of the day, opponents said it was just too hard for senators to defend back home having a Woodstock museum for Senators Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer in the state of New York -- Wolf.

BLITZER: All right, Dana, thanks very much. Dana Bash on the Hill.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Sueelldd (October 29, 2007 4:49 pm ET)
         

      CNN is in the McCain camp, as they were in 2000.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by therick (October 29, 2007 4:51 pm ET)
         

      If McCain felt so strongly against the issue he should have at least shown up to cast his NO vote.  One million dollars?  Hell no, we can get 3 or 4 more soldiers killed with that money. [For the amusement of George W. Bush]

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (October 29, 2007 4:57 pm ET)
           

        It may be noteworthy to highlight McCain's missed vote, granted......but thankfully this silly "porked" museum idea is apparently DOA.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by therick (October 29, 2007 5:20 pm ET)
             

          Yup, shot down.  Just like the 'Bridge to Nowhere' in Alaska.  WAIT !  Forgot, Republican pork went through.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (October 29, 2007 5:22 pm ET)
               

            It should all be shot down.  Did I say anything about one party or another?  No.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by therick (October 29, 2007 5:27 pm ET)
                 

              No, you didn't say anything about political parties.  I did.  Jeeeez.  Don't bite my head off, just trying to get you going by making an innocent partison observation.  :-)

              Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (October 29, 2007 5:08 pm ET)
           

        Let's see???

        Old Sawdust Brain has piled 2.0 trillion dollars in debt on the backs of the middle class.

        What's 2 trillion divided by 1 million?  Somebody tell Wolf Blitz-butt the answer.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 5:49 pm ET)
           

        First, thats a pretty sick statement you made.

        Second, the museum has got to be the dumbest idea in the senate.  Perhaps Bill persuaded Hillary to vote for it so he can go there and now say that he "inhaled". 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by therick (October 29, 2007 6:31 pm ET)
             

          Tell me how expecting McCain to show up to vote against something he believes against is sick. ?!?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by TheMarlboroMan (October 29, 2007 6:42 pm ET)
               

            Killing soldiers for amusement.  Your liberal counterparts in the senate didnt even back that speech.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (October 29, 2007 7:09 pm ET)
                 

              Yep those liberal Senators sure did us proud. (sarcasim off)

              Somehow folks like you TMM still seem to intimidate them.

              We are working on this problem. 

              Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (October 30, 2007 1:31 am ET)
             

          Clinton isnt president anymore moron. You can stop being hypnotized they the Clenis anytime now.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (October 29, 2007 5:12 pm ET)
         

      Unlike other silly "porked" ideas that passed I assume.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by therick (October 29, 2007 5:23 pm ET)
           

        Nope.  Shot down deader than bad guy facing Marshall Dillon on the streets of Dodge at the begining of every eposde of Gunsmoke in the 60's on CBS every Monday night at 8:PM.

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pbg (October 29, 2007 5:39 pm ET)
         

      Woodstock a liberal Mecca? What, are we going to go there and stare at an empty field? (or a subdivision?)

      ( I was there. With all the rain and the mud, it was great. But I'm not going there to look at the mud, which is all that's left.)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (October 29, 2007 6:46 pm ET)
           

        Mud is all that's left of...

        McCains's Brain.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by DBT-hype (October 29, 2007 9:16 pm ET)
             

          That not a very nice thing to say. Try being constructive in your comments.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (October 30, 2007 10:44 am ET)
               

            Mud is all that's left of...McCains's Brain.... by Conservative Fungus

             

            Try being constructive in your comments...by DBT-Hype

            DBT,

            That's a tall order around here. Many of the Liberals/Democrats that post on this forum have no problem making these kind of remarks aimed at Republican/Conservatives...but they do get a tad irritated when it's done in reverse.

            I once even got lectured, no make that chastised for referring to Hillary Clinton as "Hills". The forum's resident pontificator Tex scolded me, saying it was, get this...disrespectful!

            But saying McCain, has mud for brains is hunky dory with most here. Go figure.

            Don't look for any rhyme or reason here or you'll end up tearing out your hair in frustration.

            This used to be a pretty great forum to discuss & debate issues. Most of the posters were at least somewhat respectful. Oh of course there were always whackos from both sides..but this place seems overpopulated with them these days.

            That's why I've cut down on the time I spend here. If you want a reasonable, civil debate/discussion, you might be better off talking to a wall.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by MHK (October 30, 2007 11:09 am ET)
                 

               Hi J

              It's nice to see you back.

              I've been on a number of blogs were the dialog is equal to the writing on the bathroom stall of  the men's room at the local corner bar. 

              Personally I don't really care about the random "Hillary is evil" or "McCain has mud for brains" comments from regular posters as it's just people letting off steam.  If the majority of your comments are more substantial then who cares about random verbal outbursts?   Is it it really worth commenting on? 

              You have a enough cred IMO to  make the occasional "John Edwards is a fake girly man" comment with impunity...  You probably do for most of the folks here.

              I guess what I'm saying that we all need to pick and choose our battles otherwise you will just get angry.

                 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (October 30, 2007 12:02 pm ET)
                   

                Hey MHK,

                We've all joked around, which of course makes this forum kind of fun. Without it, I doubt I'd show up at all. What I've noticed lately though is some folks here simply thrive on insulting one another. Constructive criticism of another's opinion expressed here is fine...but when the reply to posts begin by referring to the poster as an ignorant Con or Lib, well...who needs that?

                As far as insulting remarks directed at candidates, pundits, columnists or TV/Radio personalities, well that's fine...but if that's all one has to offer, it gets redundant & boring.

                About a month or so ago I went back into the archives. The high quality of some of the posts back then make many I read now pale in comparison [including my own]. There seemed to be many more genuine respectful debates/discussions, & fewer drive-by insults...especially aimed at other posters.

                When Tex flipped out over my referring to Hillary as "Hills", which I did not think of as insulting, his reaction, IMO, was over the top. I thought boy the Libs around can dish out some really crude stuff about Conservative/Republican politicians, but call Hillary "Hills" and it's like breaking all ten commandments at once.

                I agree this forum is tame compared with some out there, which does keep me coming back here [that & me being a hopeless political junkie] & for the most part if you skip over the posts by the nutjobs you'll find the chance to discuss/debate with some very civil intelligent folks. I'm just afraid we're seeing a different tone here lately, & not for the better, & I'd hate to see this place turn into nothing but a name-calling screamfest.

                Yeah, I agree picking one's battles here does make sense ;-)

                My Dad always said: Pick your battles...always ask yourself, is this the hill I wanna die on?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by MHK (October 30, 2007 3:40 pm ET)
                     

                  I agree with much of what you wrote in this post. 

                  When it comes to making rude insulting posts or flippant comments I really don't think party affiliation applies...  It's human nature and we're all human.... At least I think that most of us are human.

                  I know that sometimes it's hard for people to put the past aside and move forward.  If Tex jumped on you for saying Hills, that's kind of silly IMO.  I'm not going to speak for him, but I know how easy it is to get caught up in the moment or annoyed by something someone else wrote and decided to pick a trivial point to attack them on.  I've seen most of the MMFA posse do this.  Another wonderful trait of humanity wouldn't you agree?  I think that all of us could stand to take a step back and learn from one another instead of looking for "gottcha" moments and funny insults. 

                  Anyway you make this place more interesting, so stick around won't you my conservative friend?  We still have to try to convert you (you make too much sense and are far to nice to be in the cold hearted evil conservative category)   

                  Report Abuse
    • Author by oldhacks (October 29, 2007 8:29 pm ET)
         

      Wheres your story on Mike Gravel being censored from the debate tomorrow night by CHUCK TODD!!!???

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (October 29, 2007 10:16 pm ET)
         

      I remember a list here on MM some time ago showcasing McCain's absences during voting sessions in Congress. Actually i don't feel so bad for today Mathews didn't even mention Mccain during his republican love fest errrrrr hardball ?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikeyfil7732 (October 30, 2007 4:10 pm ET)
         

      I was waiting for SOMEONE to remind us that McCain was part of the Keating 7 (5?) who helped cover the asses of the savings and loan assholes with our tax money--he's got a lot of nerve criticizing this museum after that!

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.