Matthews said, "It's not my job to sell anybody" -- then hailed Giuliani as "a tough, kick-butt policeman"
SUMMARY: On the November 6 edition of Hardball, Chris Matthews asserted, "I'm not going to sell Rudy [Giuliani]. It's not my job to sell anybody." But Matthews declared Giuliani "the person with the best shot to win the Republican nomination," and he and his panelists called Giuilani a "a gunslinger," "a straight-talker," "a quick draw," "a tough, kick-butt policeman," and "this tough, kick-butt cop from New York." Matthews has a history of gushing over Giuliani.
On the November 6 edition of MSNBC's Hardball -- during which host Chris Matthews declared former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani "the person with the best shot to win the Republican [presidential] nomination" -- Matthews asserted, "I'm not going to sell Rudy. It is not my job to sell anybody," while he and his panel of guests, which included Politico's Mike Allen and the New York Post's Charles Hurt, called Giuliani a "a gunslinger," "a straight-talker," "a quick draw," "a tough, kick-butt policeman," and "this tough, kick-butt cop from New York." Matthews has repeatedly gushed over Giuliani, as Media Matters for America has documented.
Additionally, introducing a report by MSNBC correspondent David Shuster, Matthews referred to Giuliani as "the man they call 'America's Mayor.' " During that report, Shuster said that "Giuliani was called America's mayor" in the wake of 9-11. Shuster also compared Giuliani's performance after the attacks to "Walter Cronkite getting us through the Kennedy assassination."
During the segment, Allen said, "We thought, because of his views, he's going to be a non-starter with social conservatives and the South. Turns out they like this gunslinging, straight-shooting swagger that he comes across. He'll answer a question. He'll say, 'No way, no how.' People like that." Hurt asserted, "And one important point going back to the thing about the conservative -- the issue -- the values voters." As Media Matters has documented, media figures often link "values" and religious faith with conservatives or those opposing abortion rights.
Hurt continued, "You know, because he is such a gunslinger, and because he's such a straight-talker, people believe him, I think. A lot of people believe him when he says --" Matthews interrupted, "Because he's so quick-draw." Hurt continued, "Yeah, when he says, 'I'm going to pick judges like Justice [Samuel] Alito and [Chief Justice John] Roberts,' who will -- who are the main -- that's the main issue for those guys." Matthews said, speaking of those conservatives, "[T]heir main issue, as we watch this campaign unfold in the coming months, is the more it looks like Hillary is the front-runner, the more he can make a case: 'OK, you might like a Christian conservative. You might like a Bible Belt Baptist. There ain't one that's going to win this thing, but I can win it and I can beat her.' "
Later, Matthews asserted, "You know why I've been saying this guy looks good for a long time -- looks like a potential winner? Because I've been talking to a lot of people in the South -- guys that go to lunches in the South, not necessarily church-y people, just secular Republicans -- they hear about lower taxes, law and order, they like him." He added, "They can't spell his name down there, some people, but they love the idea he is a tough, kick-butt policeman, basically, in New York, a prosecutor." On the March 1 edition of Hardball, Matthews similarly asserted that Southerners "can't spell his name necessarily, but they know Rudy was a hero."
Later still, Matthews said, "Rudy is this tough, kick-butt cop from New York. You know he's not a nice guy. You know he can be an SOB, but maybe that's what you want on the subway at 3 o'clock in the morning." He continued, "Maybe that's what people feel like in their heads right now. It is 3 o'clock in the morning, and we want a tough guy on that subway with us, right?" Allen agreed, "Right."
As he did on the November 6 broadcast of Hardball, Matthews has repeatedly invoked the imagery of a New York City police officer, New York City late at night, and the New York City subway system while praising Giuliani:
- On the March 1 edition of Hardball, Matthews also praised Giuliani as "the one tough cop who was standing on the beat when we got hit last time and stood up and took it."
- On the May 2 edition of Hardball, Matthews asked Mike DuHaime, campaign manager for Giuliani: "Who would win a street fight ... Rudy Giuliani or [Iranian] President [Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad, who would win that fight?" Matthews said that the fight would take place "over in Queens somewhere ... a dark night, it's about 2 in the morning. Two guys are out behind the building, right?" DuHaime responded, "I am putting my money on Rudy on that one." Matthews added, "If [Giuliani] wins that notion, he is the next president."
- On the March 5 edition of NBC's Today, Matthews listed among Giuliani's strengths that he "cleaned up the streets of New York so you could walk in the subways without smelling urine" and "made the city safe and clean and smell better." As Media Matters documented, Matthews had been touting Giuliani's improvement of olfactory conditions in New York's subways since 1999.
From the November 6 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:
MATTHEWS: Tonight, the person with the best shot to win the Republican nomination -- I say it's Rudy Giuliani. Once again, it's based on national and key state polling, international betting odds, and perhaps the most important point, his best and most distinguishing strengths. On Thursday, we'll tell you who we believe to be his strongest challengers. But first, Hardball's David Shuster with this quick look at the man they call "America's Mayor."
[...]
[begin video clip]
SHUSTER: He was Walter Cronkite getting us through the Kennedy assassination. Giuliani made frequent media appearances and mirrored the emotions of most Americans: shock, sadness, anger, and resolution.
GIULIANI: The city of New York and the United States of America is much stronger than any group of barbaric terrorists.
SHUSTER: Giuliani was called "America's Mayor," and he was named Time magazine's "Person of the Year." To this day, his 9-11 association takes center stage. Still, for some conservatives, there are problems: Giuliani's on his third wife; his second found out about the divorce from a news conference. Giuliani supports abortion rights, gay rights, and gun control.
[end video clip]
[...]
MATTHEWS: He's like the guy that used to -- the guys who used to play the Globetrotters, you know. His job is to make it interesting. Ron Paul keeps setting up Rudy for that basket. He just puts it in every time.
ALLEN: He does. And that response by Giuliani shows you why he's defied conventional wisdom at every turn. We thought, because of his views, he's going to be a non-starter with social conservatives and the South. Turns out, they like this gunslinging, straight-shooting swagger that he comes across. He'll answer a question.
MATTHEWS: Mike, and also --
ALLEN: He'll say, "No way, no how." People like that.
MATTHEWS: You write for the Post in New York. You know, I'm not going to sell Rudy. It's not my job to sell anybody.
ALLEN: Right.
MATTHEWS: But, you know, when I was up there -- when his first term when he was OK -- before he got a little bit too far out with the cops -- the city was safer. It felt better to be up there. You hang around Soho, you go to the movies with your kids, you go to a bookstore late at night. It was safer. Then he went too far with the cops, I think. But what --
HURT: You talk to Democrats in New York and they say that, you know, they may not like him now, and they, you know, hated him for lot of the time that he was mayor, but they will always -- when you say, "Well, what about what he did in New York?" They immediately come back down to --
MATTHEWS: Does the credit go to him or to [William] Bratton, the first [police] commissioner? Who should get the credit, or both of them?
HURT: I think it's debatable. Obviously, Giuliani thinks that it's probably -- ought to be shared considering he sort of tried to patch things up with him. But, clearly, Giuliani was the leader of all of that.
And one important point going back to the thing about the conservative -- the issue -- the values voters.
HURT: You know, because he is such a gunslinger, and because he's such a straight-talker, people believe him, I think. A lot of people believe him when he says --
MATTHEWS: Because he's so quick-draw.
HURT: Yeah, when he says, "I'm going to pick judges like Justice Alito and Roberts," who will -- who are the main -- that's the main issue for those guys.
MATTHEWS: And I think his main -- their main issue, as we watch this campaign unfold in the coming months, is the more it looks like Hillary is the front-runner, the more he can make a case: "OK, you might like a Christian conservative. You might like a Bible Belt Baptist. There ain't one that's going to win this thing, but I can win it and I can beat her," by the way, which is the new designation for Hillary. It is going to be "her," if not " 'er," as they say in Philly -- 'er.
Here's Rudy Giuliani imitating -- I've never seen mockery so early in a campaign, imitating Senator Clinton of New York on the campaign trail.
[...]
MATTHEWS: You know why I've been saying this guy looks good for a long time -- looks like a potential winner? Because I've been talking to a lot of people in the South -- guys that go to lunches in the South, not necessarily church-y people, just secular Republicans -- they hear about lower taxes, law and order, they like him. They can't spell his name down there, some people, but they love the idea he's a tough, kick-butt policeman, basically, in New York, a prosecutor, a guy who puts bad guys like [investment executive Michael] Milken away.
Let's take a look at a problem area for him. This is the police commissioner he recommended for Homeland secretary. This is a problem: Bernie Kerik. I want you, Charlie, to respond to this from the New York Post, here.
[...]
MATTHEWS: That's what -- I agree. I believe that Hillary last night, when I picked her to be the most probable Democratic nominee, and Rudy -- they are so well-known.
ALLEN: They're rock stars.
MATTHEWS: They have such iconic -- they're almost like statues in your head. You know Hillary Clinton, you either like her or don't like her, but you made up your mind a long time ago. Rudy is this tough, kick-butt cop from New York. You know he's not a nice guy. You know he can be an SOB, but maybe that's what you want on the subway at 3 o'clock in the morning.
Maybe that's what people feel like in their heads right now. It is 3 o'clock in the morning, and we want a tough guy on that subway with us, right?
ALLEN: Right.

















I guess this is another example of Matthews biased toward Rudy? The NYT thinks differently. Who is right?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/06/business/media/06msnb.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
But Matthews and Guliani are mentioned in that same sentence in that NYTs piece. Hell, Giuliani is not even mentioned anywhere.
Mr. Matthews, whose longtime opposition to the war — and to what he describes as Vice President Dick Cheney’s outsize role in the administration — has become only more pointed since he took on the title of managing editor of his broadcast over the summer.
Since then, he has talked, both on the air and off, about the “criminality” of the Bush White House, as epitomized, he says, by the role of I. Lewis Libby Jr., the vice president’s former chief of staff, in the C.I.A. leak case. Mr. Matthews’s overall ratings have edged up in the process, though not on the scale of Mr. Olbermann’s.
Interesting
I could copy and paste transcripts of Matthews gushing over Anne Coulter but that would not be relevant so I won't.
Actually it would Gov, it would show how Matthews continues to play both sides of the fence.
There is no fence, just fence salespeople.
There is a fence in America, a big long one.
Sueeld, I do find it interesting how Matthews is so disliked by many on the right and of course MMFA. I applaud Matthews for his stance on the war , his condemmnation of the VP and the war criminals, but I also think he unfairly supports people like Rudy and says things that are just not true.
Doris, I agree with you. I just think again to be fair the man is hated by the right also. MMFA targets him because he does not sing the MMFA tune, he has an open mind and looks at things non partisan despite what the NYT says or MMFA. MSNBC is very far left , OReilly even discussed this last night.
MSNBC is very far left , OReilly even discussed this last night.
I do not watch the man so I would not know
MSNBC is very far left , OReilly even discussed this last night.- SueEld
Sue, the second part of that sentence isn't intended to support the first part, is it?
No. But it tells me that there will be a segment on Olby about this tonight .
---"...Matthews is hated by the right also. MMFA targets him..." etc. etc.---
If you're implying Media Matters "hates" Matthews, there is nothing whatsoever to support that claim, nor your claim that MM says Matthews is "partisan" (they've never said that), or the claim that MSNBC is "very far left", despite what Bill O'Reilly may opine.
Oh please, MMFA hates Matthews why else would they name him Misinformer of the year. Out of love?
Mmmm....good point, Sue.
NO WAY it could be because he spread more conservative misinformation than anyone else in '05. I mean, heh, that's just ridiculous.
I'm sorry, Sueeld, but your argument is silly. MM pointed out in this post a specific example with transcripts and video of Matthews gushing over Giuiani for reasons that are merely talking points from his campaign. They have posted so many of those individual examples of Matthews doing this for various Republicans and doing the opposite for Dems over the last year that he earned his title of misinformer of the year.
How is earning a title based on documented evidence an example of MM "hating" Matthews? When MLB handed the world series title to the Red Sox, is it because they love the Sox and hate the Rockies?
Riiight. Sure thing.
Matthews wasn't Media Matters' Misinformer of the Year because there's a very well-documented, extensive, detailed record of his misinformation here that surpassed all other nominees' records (and that's saying something). Oh, no. It's just cuz they HATE him.
That's not a simple-minded view at all.
Could this mean that we're present at the discovery of Matthews Derangement Syndrome? I've gotta coin a name for the disease afflicting people who don't like me.It really seems to do away with that annoying accountability thing.
Astigmatic epicurianism? Dosen't quite roll off the tongue.
I guess you could say that we suffer from "truthiphilia", and Sueeld suffers from "truthiphobia".
Ah because he spewed a whole lot of misinformation over the year? You act like it is personal. It isnt. You SAYING it is doesnt make it so.
No MMFA exposes him when he pushes unsupported conservative dogma or misinformation. Like this. I dont sell people just a minute while I gush over Rudi. Or when he said everyone really likes Bush except the loonies or that Bush shines with sunny nobility or is like Atticus Finch. Matthews is not targetted at all. He just says a lot of stupid things and they land him here. I dont think Tweety is a rightwinger and MMFA never said he was it is not a requirement to show up here. I think he is dumb as a post. I also think he falls head over heels for these tough acting Republicans. That causes him to say dumb things like this topic
meant "are not mentioned"
(what I don't get is how a Times article that makes no mention of Giuliani can somehow have something to do with Giuliani)
Has to do with Matthews who is mentioned.
It does not undo the fact that Matthews praised Rudy with his "tough, kick-butt policeman" comment. It still happened.
of course it happened, what is your point?
Matthews' biased toward Rudy exists. So that makes the NY Times (and its unrelated article) wrong. My point is that I've answered your question. Your welcome.
Matthews has biased toward everything which was my point, thanks for clarifying it.
Sueeld, I do not know if he has a "biased" Toward everything, but as I said earlier he is a master at playing both sides. ie his love of Rudy and his opposition to the war and anti Cheney rhetoric.
I disagree. Matthews is not a master of both sides,
There's a part of him he seldom hides,
Which is why I don't hate him, but neither am I his fan
He's a thorough, dyed-in-the wool Republican.
I would agree but Matthews stance toward Dick Cheney changed my mind.
I have no idea what this means.
But wouldn't someone who's biased towards everything be biased towards nothing?
Hmmm. That's one to stroke your chin over.
"They can't spell his name down there, some people, but they love the idea he's a tough, kick-butt policeman"
Well, there ya go. Rudy has the Republican knuckledraggers all sewn up. With Pat Robertson's endorsement, he's probably got the Evangelical Troglodyte vote, as well. It's now up to the thinking population to stave off Rudy's determination to usher in Armageddon and bring back Jeeeezzzzzuuuuusssssss.
Ha! Giuliani in drag! Ha! Ha Ha! HA!
For some reason, Matthews has this tendency to get all horny about these Republican candidates. Not sure what that's all about. But frankly, I want someone at the helm with some brains... we've already experienced the dumb, "tough guy" on the subway at 3 o'clock in the morning... and - surprise - we got mugged.
The two Matthews/Rudy threads should have been combined into one. Just to avoid repeating ourselves.
I'm just trying to be helpful o:-)
Chris & Rudy up in a tree...
Matthews bad, Rudy bad.
Sue Sad
No Sue happy, because Rudy is bad. Matthews is just a player.
Matthews said, "It's not my job to sell anybody"
Guess he's selling Rudy on a volunteer basis.....
He's working on commission.
He could volunteer for Ghouliani's campaign...
Maybe as Rudy's personal trainer, or masseuse.
One big problem with Chris's cop-in-the-subway analogy...the United States IS the cop.
I am surpised Chris Matthews did not bring up the "urine" smell is gone story he always discussed.
Maybe Tweety takes viagra before the show?///
Then he has a nice hard-on to help him gush over his latest conservative love affair.
haha wow you're soooo funny. Can I get a tape of your jokes? Perhaps a little recording, you know, a DVD? You gonna do standup? You gonna stand up and do some of those jokes for us? That would be soooo funny.
Come on, don't be such a sourpuss...
We gotta have a little fun with politics once in a while.
Matthews is an avowed liberal. He knows this election sould be a slam dunk for any democrat - except Hillary. She has too much baggage and could cost the Democrats the election - her negatives are too high.
He likes Rudy because though Rudy will run as a republican - he's not a conservative. Rudy did much to turn NY City around from a borderline slum, including implementing many social programs that Libs like.
Matthews puts his idealism before the party that generally represents it, and Media Matters doesn't like that.
--"Matthews is an avowed liberal"--
"Avowed" means the person has "confessed or asserted openly". Where has Matthews recently (not 30 or 40 years ago) "avowed" that he is "a liberal"?
He had a personal conversation with WC4ME...
and confessed to his "liberalism." Then he popped some viagra, put on his best dress, and started spinning like hell for Ghouliani.
After all, he's gotta think about keeping his job.
You are deranged. Matthews admitted he voted for Bush "at least once". He said Bush shines with a sort of sunny nobility, that he is like Atticus Finch. I am not saying Tweety is a rightwinger but to say he is a liberal is to leave reality far behind.
I really do not car what Matthews calls himself. I do know he did everything in his power to merginlize Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and to a certain extent Kerry. Now he is doing the same to Hillary Clinton.
--"Matthews is an avowed liberal"--
Meaning he actually served in the military, is not on his third marriage and has never paid for sex in a bus station mens room?
Mathews is the worst kind of malcontent. He critices a lot of what Bush, Cheney and the 'Pubs do (which is a credit to him) but then turns around and helps torpedoe the Democrat's campaigns, and thus the best chance to fix some of the very stuff he was criticising!
I guess he figures if he bashes both sides a little (albeit unevenly) that means he being objective.
And since when was Guiliani a "cop" ? He was a lawyer for pete's sake. There's a difference. Just ask a real cop. How often did Rudy have to look down the barrel of a gun? Or break down adoor, not knowing what was waiting on the other side? (All for a fraction of the salary Rudy was pulling down.) What's next? When he blows out the candles on his birthday cake will that make him a fire-fighter?
(Oh yeah, and don't forget: 9/11!)
Anyone who is a true-crime geek (like me) and has read dozens of Mob books knows that Judy Ruliani is a tough, kick-butt, quick-draw glory grabber.
Absolutely right. Funny how Rudy couldn't stand to share the credit for NYC's drop in crime with Bratton. Now that Bratton's in LA, crime has dropped there. How 'bout that?
Bratton and innumerable others -- including the NYPD's hard-working Mob squads.
Judy Ruliani is a fraud.