About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hume: Clintons' "ability to withhold information from the public extends ... to the University of Arkansas library"

November 08, 2007 1:45 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: On Fox News' Special Report, Brit Hume asserted that "[t]he Clintons' ability to withhold information from the public extends not just to the Clinton Presidential Library it seems, but also to the University of Arkansas library as well," but provided no evidence to support that claim. Indeed, Hume later said: "The Clinton campaign says it has not had any contact with the University of Arkansas about delaying the release of the papers."

37 Comments

During the "Grapevine" segment of the November 6 edition of Fox News' Special Report, Fox News Washington managing editor and host Brit Hume asserted: "The Clintons' ability to withhold information from the public extends not just to the Clinton Presidential Library it seems, but also to the University of Arkansas library as well. Four enormous binders of data about the Clinton presidency -- and [Sen.] Hillary Clinton's [D-NY] role in it -- apparently will not be released to the public by the university library before next year's election." However, Hume provided no evidence of "[t]he Clintons' ability to withhold" from the public documents held by the University of Arkansas library. Indeed, as Hume later acknowledged: "The Clinton campaign says it has not had any contact with the University of Arkansas about delaying the release of the papers." In a November 6 ABCNews.com article on the papers, which Hume cited during his report, ABC News senior national correspondent Jake Tapper reported: " 'It's not a conspiracy,' [Tom] Dillard [head of the University of Arkansas Special Collections Department] told ABC News. No representative of the Clintons has been in touch with the Library, he said. 'No, absolutely not. No political campaign has been in touch with us. Nor have any individuals been in touch with us asking us to do anything different from what we would normally do.' "

Additionally, Hume claimed:

HUME: Last month, the library said the papers would not be made public until 2009 because they were not yet processed. But the library's annual report for '05-'06 says the processing is, quote, "nearing completion," and, one year later, the library newsletter said the Blair papers were, quote, "previously processed."

While Hume claimed that the university library's newsletter said the "papers were, quote, 'previously processed,' " the newsletter simply stated that university archivist Kerry Jones "previously processed the papers of the late Diane Blair." Tapper wrote that this "implied the job has been completed." However, Tapper also quoted Dillard saying: "All I can say is that was a preliminary estimation and neither of the collections that were reported on are finished, neither Blair nor Congressman Hutchinson's papers"; "They're just not ready."

The newsletter reported:

The Special Collections Department is gearing up to begin processing its largest manuscript collection, the papers of former U. S. Congressman John Paul Hammerschmidt. These records, more than 1,400 boxes of materials, document Hammerschmidt's 26-year tenure as the representative for Arkansas' third district, 1967-1993.

According to Timothy G. Nutt, the manuscripts and rare books librarian in the Special Collections Department, a staff of three processing archivists as well as an intern from the Honors College have been hired to process the collection. Leading the processing is Felicia Thomas, who previously worked on the papers of another former third-district congressman, Asa Hutchinson. Other processors are Kerry Jones, who previously processed the papers of the late Diane Blair, and Case Minor, a history graduate student. Will Puddephatt, an Honors College junior majoring in German and history, will serve as the project intern.

The library's '06-'07 annual report, which appears to cover the time period from June 30, 2006, to June 30, 2007, indicated that library staff worked on the Blair papers during that period:

The Libraries had the assistance of four Honors College interns this year in Special Collections. They assisted manuscript processors in working on various manuscript projects, including the Diane Blair Papers, the John Paul Hammerschmidt Papers, the Fay Jones Collection, the Larry Vonalt Papers, Cynthia Rodes Smith Correspondence, Henry and Katie Wood Collection, John M. Page Correspondence, the 20th Century Club Collection.

From the November 6 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume:

HUME: The Clintons' ability to withhold information from the public extends not just to the Clinton Presidential Library it seems, but also to the University of Arkansas library as well. Four enormous binders of data about the Clinton presidency -- and Hillary Clinton's role in it -- apparently will not be released to the public by the university library before next year's election.

ABC News reports the information was compiled by Clinton friend Diane Blair for a book, but Blair never wrote it and passed away in 2000. The Clintons have one copy of the papers, the other's at the university.

Last month, the library said the papers would not be made public until 2009 because they were not yet processed. But the library's annual report for '05-'06 says the processing is, quote, "nearing completion," and, one year later, the library newsletter said the Blair papers were, quote, "previously processed."

The Clinton campaign says it has not had any contact with the University of Arkansas about delaying the release of the papers.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dangrady (November 08, 2007 1:54 pm ET)
         

      SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!

      Executive Priviledge being used by this Administration for communications between staffers, and just about anything that they deem priviledged and he finds this to be a story???

      The most secretive government in American History, a Vice President that would assert that he is not part of the Executive Branch in order to ignore Congressional overtsight and suppeonas!! Fox won't talk about that, but if the Clintons withhold personal correspondence between husband and wife in the White House, that's a story!!

      Fair and Balanced, when they're off their meds!

      Happy Thoughts;

      Dan Grady

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (November 08, 2007 1:59 pm ET)
         

      Brit Hume is a joke.  He's not even qualified to flip burgers at McDonalds.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (November 08, 2007 2:02 pm ET)
           

        McDonald's hiring standards are like a Harvard Medical exam when compared to the qualifications required to be a Fox news "journalist" or "contributor".

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jawill11 (November 08, 2007 2:38 pm ET)
             

          But Fox's requirements are surpisingly similar to those of Hooters.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (November 08, 2007 3:29 pm ET)
               

            I'm sure Brit Hume would look silly in one of those Hooters waitress uniforms.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by Slade (November 08, 2007 2:04 pm ET)
           

        Would you like Freedom Fries with that?

        har har

        Report Abuse
      • Author by JLyons (November 08, 2007 2:09 pm ET)
           

        Brit Hume is the choice anchor of VP Cheney. #1 propaganda minister of the Administration.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Marker (November 08, 2007 2:18 pm ET)
         

      Brit is all flustered because without those papers how can fake noise attack the Clintons, oh that's right, just make it up like they always do. Lets make the repug's extinct in '08...it's the best chance this country has to make it.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (November 08, 2007 2:24 pm ET)
           

        The liquor bills on the expense accounts at Fox must be astronomical. The only way I could get through projecting such dreck is through hard rye.

        Just look at Brit's droopy eyes for evidence.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (November 09, 2007 7:45 am ET)
             

          The liquor bills on the expense accounts at Fox must be astronomical. The only way I could get through projecting such dreck is through hard rye.

          Just look at Brit's droopy eyes for evidence.

          Doesn't OxyContin do that, too?  Or should we ask Limbaugh about that?

          Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (November 08, 2007 2:49 pm ET)
           

        Marker, They are doing it to themselves so a little help will push them away faster.             I hear that the newest symbol of the Republan Party is the DODO bird. Correct me if I'm wrong, please. Heard it on XOF NEWS,,Unfair and Semi-Unbalanced

        Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (November 08, 2007 2:20 pm ET)
         

      Now, you'd think with all of the noise about the Clintons over the years, and how power hungry they are, and how deceitful, and conniving that they are supposed to be, that they'd be ruling the world by now, and would only be interested in, you know, themselves, and what THEY can get out of being in positions of power. But then again, we have the truth of the matter. Bill, running his organization and working around the world to make things better. Hillary, being a Senator working for the people of NY (ask them what kind of job she's doing for them). I mean, holy cow! Secret documents? Isn't Cheney the man who created his own secrecy standard for things like memos that were going to be sent out to the press anyway? People who work for the President being protected, and not being held accountable for, well, much of anything. What a joke Foxnews is, and they keep proving it with big "reports" such as this.

      Isn't it pretty standard operating procedure for a former President to keep his papers private and secure for a certain length of time post presidency so that archivists and others can go through them, and see what is acceptable for public dissemination and what isn't acceptable? I seem to remember Ford keeping a ton of stuff private, and held close to the vest until he passed away, and THEN it could be released. I'm just saying, Bill has only been out of office for 7 years, and it takes a lot longer to go through the mass of paper and electronic documents that were no doubt created during his presidency and all. Especially when you don't have a ton of people working on clearing the papers.

      Anyway, just something else for the right wingers to yell and scream about instead of talking about the issues and things like that.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by justicetruthus8276 (November 08, 2007 2:28 pm ET)
         

       

      Justice and Truth in the USA - FACT CHECK:  Press Release

      All the Clinton papers and records need to be released immediately - before the next election - to insure that we have open, honest, and accountable government.

       

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (November 08, 2007 2:31 pm ET)
           

        WZWRITER - FACT CHECK:  Press Release

        JusticeTroll needs to immediately undergo a frontal lobotomy - before the next election - to insure that MMFA remains drek-free.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by LeftSidePositive (November 08, 2007 2:40 pm ET)
             

          No!! The frontal cortex is important in moderating socially acceptable behavior and repressing destructive urges.

          Do you really want a PHINEASGAGEUS8276 doing your "fact checks" reacting impulsively from his limbic system without any cortical control?!

          He doesn't have enough of a frontal cortex as it is--that's his PROBLEM.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (November 08, 2007 2:32 pm ET)
           

        Tell that one to Bush, I'm sure he'll comply with your request.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by LeftSidePositive (November 08, 2007 2:35 pm ET)
           

        Sanity and Logic on the MMFA message board - Fact Check: Press Release

        So, as I already tried to explain to you on your previous inane post in a related thread, [link to mediamatters.org] , what if one of those documents that is released immediately contains someone's Social Security Number or private medical information?!

        We just say, "Oops! Sorry to whoever's identity got stolen, but we needed all these papers out immediately to address some cooked-up media controversy, and your privacy doesn't really matter."

        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (November 08, 2007 2:50 pm ET)
           

        I am sorry, but without your punchline (i.e. "the call"), I have no idea whose side you finally came out on here?  Who is right?  MMFA or Hume?  I gots ta know!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by dave_chicago (November 08, 2007 4:27 pm ET)
           

        ---"All the Clinton papers and records need to be released immediately"---

        Or else this anonymous person will post another "press release".

        Choose wisely, Clintons....

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Marker (November 08, 2007 2:30 pm ET)
         

      Let's release all the papers, from JFK to Shrub (including the Texas days) and then we can find out what America really wants to know.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (November 08, 2007 2:31 pm ET)
         

      Justice and Truth in the USA - Fact Check:

      If you look at the facts, you will find that the university of arkansas is indeed located in Arkansas.

      It was a close call but I have to call this one for Brit Hume.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by open_mind (November 08, 2007 2:34 pm ET)
         

      Sorry, but I am waiting anxiously to read how JustUs is going to call this one before I make up my mind about it.

      ; )

      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (November 08, 2007 2:52 pm ET)
           

        Dang.  He already posted, but he didn't make a call, so I am confused.

        :o(

        Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (November 08, 2007 2:38 pm ET)
         

      Justice and Truth in the USA - Fact Check:

      It was a close call, but I'd rather have a frontal lobotomy instead of a bottle in front of me.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jawill11 (November 08, 2007 2:45 pm ET)
         

      Special Report:  BRIT HUME'S SEXUAL DEVIENCE EXTENDS TO HAVING BATHROOM AFFAIRS WITH LARRY CRAIG

       

       

      -Larry Craig denies ever having an affair with Brit Hume.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (November 08, 2007 2:56 pm ET)
         

      I would like to trade 50,000 pages of the reviewed documents for one page of Dick Cheney's attendance list at that government financed Energy Meeting.

      Come on  Brit, you can do it.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by unhipcat (November 08, 2007 3:13 pm ET)
         

      when is bush 1 releasing his papers?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by anotheramerican (November 08, 2007 4:05 pm ET)
         

      I don't see why anyone would object to the Clinton's releasing their papers in more timely manner.

      All of the humorists above are conveniently ignoring the issue.

      Even if you are a Clinton supporter, you have to acknowledge that they have not always been forthcoming about certain actions.

      It is the same thing that torpedoed  Mssr. Kerry.   It also almost shot down Bush. If the public is thinking a politician is hiding something, they are apt to think the worst.

      So, lets talk about the issue rather than overworn lobotomy jokes and homophobic remarks about Craig. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (November 08, 2007 4:41 pm ET)
           

        It also almost shot down Bush. If the public is thinking a politician is hiding something, they are apt to think the worst.

        So... you're saying that the rebulicans are just better at sewing inuenndo and misinformation that the democrats are?  Oh well, I guess they have to be better at something.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by LeftSidePositive (November 08, 2007 10:06 pm ET)
           

        AA, why don't you read the posts (and the information in the MMFA articles) about how long it actually takes to process these documents? It's a privacy issue for everyone involved, not just those running for office, but anyone referred to in those documents, who might have personal information that would be disclosed without their consent.

        And the remarks about Larry Craig are not homophobic. They're hypocritophobic.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jawill11 (November 09, 2007 10:22 am ET)
             

          My Craig remark was more pseudojournalismaphobic aimed at Hume more than anything else. 

          And AA, a serious discussion of records releases could be had, but the main point of this post is what I highlighted with my apparently offensive Craig joke, that Hume is engaging in propoganda and lies in this piece, not actual journalism.  He has reduced himself to the level of a weekly world news reporter.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (November 08, 2007 4:19 pm ET)
         

      "All the Clinton papers and records need to be released immediately - before the next election - to insure that we have open, honest, and accountable government."

      - justicetruthus8276

      "I don't see why anyone would object to the Clinton's releasing their papers in more timely manner."

      - anotheramerican

      Sure thing. By the way, any idea when Bush(43) is going to release Bush(41)'s records? Does that bother you as well?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (November 08, 2007 5:08 pm ET)
         

      Man, these far right idiots are so easily distracted.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MoonbatYouBet (November 08, 2007 5:28 pm ET)
         

      Where exactly was our "fair and balanced" media when the process of reclassifying thousands of previously available and published government documents went into high speed right about 2001?

       

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.