About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Ignoring Obama's actual statements, CNN and Fox News claimed Obama "waffled" on driver's licenses

November 16, 2007 4:53 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: CNN's Anderson Cooper and Gloria Borger, and Fox News' Megyn Kelly claimed that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) "waffled" during the Democratic presidential debate on the issue of driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants. In fact, Obama stated: "Look, I have already said, I support the notion that we have to deal with public safety and that driver's licenses at the state level can make that happen." When debate moderator Wolf Blitzer asked him to respond "yes or no" to the question, "Do you support driver's licenses for illegal immigrants?" Obama answered, "Yes."

34 Comments

Following the November 15 Democratic presidential debate, CNN host Anderson Cooper and CNN senior political analyst Gloria Borger claimed that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) "waffled" on the issue of driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants during the debate. Neither Anderson nor Borger offered any support for their claim that Obama had "waffled" on the issue and ignored Obama's statement during the debate reasserting his prior support for allowing licenses for undocumented immigrants. Obama said: "Look, I have already said, I support the notion that we have to deal with public safety and that driver's licenses at the state level can make that happen."

Additionally, Cooper claimed that "[a]fter not answering yes or no whether he supports a driver's license for illegal immigrants, he [Obama] did kind of give a longer answer," and aired a clip of Obama saying: "What we have to do is create a comprehensive solution to the problem. Now, I have already stated that as president I will make sure that we finally have the kind of border security that we need. That's step number one. Step number two is to take on employers. Right now, they -- an employer has more of a chance of getting hit by lightning than be prosecuted for hiring an undocumented worker." That clip, however, was actually from Obama's answer to the question that preceded debate moderator and CNN host Wolf Blitzer's questions about driver's licenses.

Similarly, on the November 16 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, Politico editor-in-chief John Harris claimed that Obama "hadn't decided where he wants to be" on the driver's license issue, and said that he "did try and do a tap dance." Co-host Megyn Kelly responded: "Yeah, he waffled a bit last night." Neither Kelly nor Harris quoted from Obama's answer, and Fox News did not air any video of Obama's comments on driver's licenses during the segment.

CNN political contributor James Carville, identified by CNN as a former Clinton White House official but not as a supporter of Hillary Clinton for president, responded to Cooper's question -- "[D]id it interest you that Barack Obama kind of seemed to waffle on the question about supporting driver's licenses for illegal immigrants?" -- by saying: "Yeah, a little bit, it did. I mean, you had to know this question was coming."

From CNN's post-debate coverage:

COOPER: Back with our panel, former presidential advisers David Gergen and James Carville, CNN senior political analyst Gloria Borger, and CNN political contributor J.C. Watts, also a former congressman. Immigration a major talking point in this debate, which led to some dodging of some questions. James Carville, did it interest you that -- that Barack Obama kind of seemed to waffle on the question about supporting driver's licenses for illegal immigrants?

CARVILLE: Yeah, a little bit, it did. I mean, you had to know this question was coming. It wasn't like the question had come out of left field or something like that. It was a big issue in the previous debate. Any -- any debate prep would have had this. And I was a little surprised. His answer, if you look at the whole thing, it sort of made sense, but it was sort of convoluted in coming out, and particularly when they were trying to attack Senator Clinton for saying, you're trying to have it both ways. It looked like he -- he could have been a lot more concise in his answer.

I was -- I pick up on your point, and I was a little surprised that he wasn't a little more prepared and a little more concise on that.

COOPER: After not answering yes or no whether he supports a driver's license for illegal immigrants, he did kind of give a longer answer. Let's play some of that.

OBAMA [video clip]: What we have to do is create a comprehensive solution to the problem. Now, I have already stated that as president I will make sure that we finally have the kind of border security that we need. That's step number one. Step number two is to take on employers. Right now, they -- an employer has more of a chance of getting hit by lightning than be prosecuted for hiring an undocumented worker.

COOPER: Gloria Borger, his long answer basically stands in stark contrast to Hillary Clinton, who just said, no, she no longer -- she doesn't support driver's licenses for illegal immigrants.

BORGER: Right. And she knew she had to do that. And Wolf made it very clear that this was kind of just a yes-or-no answer. And what was sort of ironic was that Obama had come out at the beginning of the debate attacking Hillary for taking two weeks to come up with her position on driver's licenses for illegal immigrants, and then he still waffled and was very unclear at this debate.

That's the difference between a very experienced candidate, which you have in Hillary Clinton, and one which you don't in Barack Obama.

The Obama clip Cooper aired, however, was not in response to the issue of driver's licenses for undocumented immigrants. It was actually from Obama's response to CNN anchor Campbell Brown's "more general[]" question about immigration that preceded Blitzer's specific questions about whether Obama supports driver's licenses for undocumented workers. Obama responded to Blitzer's questions by saying, in part: "Look, I have already said, I support the notion that we have to deal with public safety and that driver's licenses at the state level can make that happen." Moreover, Obama answered, "Yes," when Blitzer later asked him to respond "yes or no" to the question, "Do you support driver's licenses for illegal immigrants?"

From the November 15 debate:

BROWN: All right, let's talk about the issues. Senator Obama, I want to ask you about immigration. It's an important issue in this state in particular. There are between 100,000 to 200,000 illegal immigrants here in Nevada. And you supported various benefits for illegal immigrants, including driver's licenses and in-state college tuition. What do you say to those Americans who say they are losing out because you would give benefits to people who broke the laws of this country, who came here illegally?

And then more generally, as president, where do you draw the line when it comes to benefits for illegal immigrants?

OBAMA: I would say that they're justified in feeling frustrated because this administration, the Bush administration, has done nothing to control the problem that we have. We've had 5 million undocumented workers come over the borders since George Bush took office. It has become an extraordinary problem. And, the reason the American people are concerned is because they are seeing their own economic positions slip away. And, oftentimes, employers are exploiting these undocumented workers. They're not paying the minimum wage. They're not observing worker safety laws.

And, so what we have to do is create a comprehensive solution to the problem. Now, I have already stated that as president I will make sure that we finally have the kind of border security that we need. That's step number one. Step number two is to take on employers. Right now, an employer has more of a chance of getting hit by lightning than be prosecuted for hiring an undocumented worker. That has to change. They have to be held accountable.

[applause]

And when we do those things --

[applause]

When we do those things, I believe that we can take the undocumented workers, the illegal aliens who are here, get them out of the shadows, make sure that they are subject to a stiff penalty, make sure that they're learning English, make sure that they go to the back of the line so they're not getting an advantage over people who came here legally. And when we do that, I think that we can, instead of shedding all this heat, start shedding some light on the problem, and we can once again be a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. That's what I intend to do as president of the United States.

BLITZER: All right. I want to just press you on this point, because it's a logical follow-up, and then I want to go and ask everyone. On the issue that apparently tripped up Senator Clinton earlier, the issue of driver's licenses for illegal immigrants, I take it, Senator Obama, you support giving driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. Is that right?

OBAMA: When I was a state senator in Illinois, I voted to require that illegal aliens get trained, get a license, get insurance to protect public safety. That was my intention.

[applause]

And -- but I have to make sure that people understand. The problem we have here is not driver's licenses. Undocumented workers don't come here to drive.

[laughter]

They don't go -- they're not coming here to go to the In-N-Out Burger. That's not the reason they're here. They're here to work. And so instead of being distracted by what has now become a wedge issue, let's focus on actually solving the problem that this administration, the Bush administration, has done nothing about it.

BLITZER: Well, let's go through everybody because I want to be precise. I want to make sure the viewers and those of us who are here fully understand all of your positions on this barring -- avoiding, assuming -- there isn't going to be comprehensive immigration reform.

Do you support or oppose driver's licenses for illegal immigrants?

OBAMA: I am not proposing that that's what we do.

What I'm saying is that we can't --

[laughter]

No, no, no, no. Look, I have already said, I support the notion that we have to deal with public safety and that driver's licenses at the state level can make that happen.

But what I also know --

BLITZER: All right --

OBAMA: But what I also know, Wolf, is that if we keep on getting distracted by this problem, then we are not solving it.

BLITZER: But -- because this is the kind of question that is sort of available for a yes or no answer.

[laughter]

Either you support it or you oppose it.

From the November 16 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom:

KELLY: You know, the interesting thing about that debate on the driver's licenses is that at the last debate, Hillary Clinton was asked about it, she waffled on whether she was for it or against it --

HARRIS: Right.

KELLY: Then she came out and said she was for it, then she came out again and said she was against it, then Wolf Blitzer had them do a yes-or-no answer, are you for it or against it? And again she said, "No, I'm against it." But there was no follow-up, John. Wolf didn't really press her on that. Some people are saying she scored a lot of points last night because perhaps the moderators weren't tough enough on her in terms of following up. What's your take on that?

HARRIS: Well, look, the other campaigns are saying exactly that -- saying that CNN gave her a bit of a pass on that. She definitely has zig-zagged on this issue, but she clearly is where she needs to be - she's decided where she needs to be on this issue, which is a flat no. Obama, surprisingly, hadn't decided where he wants to be on that. He did try and do a tap dance.

KELLY: Yeah, he waffled a bit last night. Then there was Edwards, who was sort of pursuing his attack dog role that he's taken on as of late.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (November 16, 2007 4:58 pm ET)
         

      Come on MMFA, even James Carville admitted Obama "waffled".  You really are out on a lonely limb on this one, except for your loyalists here.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by DorisRussell (November 16, 2007 4:59 pm ET)
           

        Tommy, James Carville is not exactly a fan of MMFA or vice versa. This is a man I found out is going to be Imus first guest on December 3. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (November 16, 2007 5:06 pm ET)
             

          Doris,

          The point is Carville has enough honesty to admit it, why is it so hard for the folks here to see it for what it exactly is?  

          I was very disappointed in Obama's response to this, it's his unclear opinion however. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (November 16, 2007 5:20 pm ET)
               

            Tommy,

            Listening to Obama waffle on this was like a Hillary replay.

            He did finally say "Yes", but only after a Yes or No answer was demanded.

            Not Obama's finest moment.

            And BTW the wrong answer. I was really disappointed.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (November 16, 2007 5:22 pm ET)
                 

              It was very puzzling, considering all the flak as a result of the last debate. Did Obama not learn anything from that debate, on the very same issue?  It was a stunner, and you're right, disappointing.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by IowaDem (November 16, 2007 6:00 pm ET)
                   

                "Look, I have already said, I support the notion that we have to deal with public safety and that driver's licenses at the state level can make that happen." What does this statement mean to you, Tommy?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (November 16, 2007 6:24 pm ET)
                     

                  I have no idea, it looks like from the quote you highlighted that he favors it - but in the quotes preceding that he says "I am not proposing that's what we do.....No,no,no,no".........??????

                  If you can figure out that waffle, then enjoy your breakfast. 

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by sundog (November 17, 2007 2:38 pm ET)
                     

                  Iowadem, I think Timmy has made it clear that was just too many words to understand.  Please don't make him think. 

                  Report Abuse
      • Author by zamfir273114 (November 16, 2007 6:44 pm ET)
           

        WOW! Could Obama waffle any worse on a question?!? Geez. What a let down.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (November 17, 2007 2:30 am ET)
             

          Tommy, Jeter and Zamfir-

          Are you in favor of undocumented aliens?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (November 17, 2007 2:31 am ET)
               

            I almost forgot- that's a yes or no question.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (November 17, 2007 8:32 am ET)
                 

              NO I'm not in favor of ILLEGAL aliens.

              Gee that was easy Beach.....

              Maybe I should be running for President?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Si_W (November 17, 2007 12:42 pm ET)
                   

                And your solution to this problem therefore would be?

                Report Abuse
              • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (November 18, 2007 2:41 am ET)
                   

                Why did you change the wording of the question, Jeter? Can't you answer a simple yes or no question? Why are you stumbling and waffling?Why did it take you so many words when all that was required was a "yes" or "no"?

                Not so easy, is it?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (November 18, 2007 2:45 am ET)
                     

                  But, let me trim the fat off of your answer; 

                  "Are you in favor of undocumented aliens?... that's a yes or no question.

                  "No..."

                  So, you want aliens documented? Like with drivers licenses?

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jeter2 (November 18, 2007 8:28 am ET)
                       

                    Good grief Beach. That was lame.

                     

                    Why did you change the wording of the question, Jeter?

                    Because unlike Moonbats I don't subscribe to politically correct pandering liberalspeak. I suppose you'd prefer we refer to Jailed Criminals as Inconsiderate Shut-Ins.

                    Can't you answer a simple yes or no question?

                    I believe my answer was a simple NO. Having to correct your PC mumbo jumbo was necessary.

                    So, you want aliens documented? Like with drivers licenses?

                    Aw Beach that was weak...I do expect better from the cleverest poster here.

                    Let me ask you this:

                    Are you in favor of Muslim terrorists?

                    Yes or No?

                    I'm sure, if you're sane, you'd answer NO.

                    Are we then to conclude you're in favor of all other types of terrorism? Wow! Thanks Beach, that was enlightening.

                    Report Abuse
      • Author by sundog (November 17, 2007 5:44 pm ET)
           

        Carville ADMITTED Obama did that? Timmy, Carville was spinning the 'debate' as a big victory for his close associate Hillary Clinton. This was plain spin. Are you so stuck on the right left teams that you simply can't comprehend of a nomination campaign. My god, you spend half your life here and you still don't know anything about politics.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jolney5377 (November 17, 2007 2:41 am ET)
         

      Ha, I like how Anderson begins to say she said "No, she no longer--(oh wait we're supposed to make Hillary look good)--I mean, she doesn't support driver's licenses for illegal immigrants."

      Oh, come on, even James Carville (unidentified supporter of Clinton) said he waffled! Surely that makes it so! God I hate the media.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by zamfir273114 (November 17, 2007 6:05 am ET)
         

      No, not in favor of undocumented aliens.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (November 18, 2007 2:49 am ET)
           

        So you support giving them drivers licenses (documents) just as Jeter does. Thanks.

        That's why politicians(and guests of Sean Hannity) don't always answer those "yes or no" questions- they're sharper than you are.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (November 18, 2007 8:32 am ET)
             

          Beach,

          Just in case Zamfir doesn't get back here to play your silly game...

          What a sad attempt at trying to prop up Obama's waffling by playing lame word games.

          This is one reason I can't take some of you here seriously.

          Beach, you can parse, cut, slice, dice, then sprinkle some Moonbat Politically Correct Liberalspeak nuance on it, & it still come out as a very simple question...

          Are you in favor of giving drivers licenses to ILLEGAL aliens is a no brainer question that requires a simple answer of YES or NO.

          Even Hillary got it correct this time....

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Si_W (November 18, 2007 11:57 am ET)
               

            Regardless, you failed to provide your solution as to what you'd do instead...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (November 19, 2007 10:16 am ET)
                 

              You are trying to divert this discussion away from Obama's waffling about Drivers Licenses for ILLEGAL aliens but I'll answer you this way:

              Enforce our present laws, Deport those that are here illegally. Fine businesses that hire ILLEGAL aliens. Build a wall, & Reinforce our borders with more guards ..

              It can be done.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Si_W (November 19, 2007 1:40 pm ET)
                   

                I'm not trying to divert, I'm trying to understand the problem so I can see why there's enough discussion of waffling.

                 How big a problem is this?  How many illegal aliens would require to be licensed?  How many other illegal aliens are there?  If deportation can be done as easily as you suggest, then why are these questions even being asked?  Why are there measures in place to deport them already?

                Report Abuse
          • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (November 19, 2007 2:48 am ET)
               

            Jeter, why did it take you two pretty long posts to explain your answer to a simple yes or no question?

            And why is it a silly game when some idiot anonymous poster on a website (me) does it, but perfectly acceptable when a supposedly credible member of our media does it?

            That was really my only point, that just because the questioner insists that a question is simple, the questionee (?) can have another opinion.

            Liberal mumbo-jumbo and PC doublespeak notwithstanding. ;0)

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (November 19, 2007 10:04 am ET)
                 

              Jeter, why did it take you two pretty long posts to explain your answer to a simple yes or no question?

              Beach, my posts were lengthy, but as you well know not in an attempt of explaining MY answer, but rather in debunking YOUR question as a word game.

              There are of course *General* questions about Illegal aliens which cannot be answered by a simple YES or NO, & there are *Specific* questions that need no beating around the bush, no parsing,slicing, dicing or nuance.

              Should ILLEGAL aliens that have been found guilty of criminal behavior be deported immediately back to their country of origin?

              YES.

              No need to hem & haw on this, is there?

              Quite frankly Beach ALL ILLEGAL aliens should be deported, but because we have been so lax about enforcing our own immigration laws we now find ourselves in a quandary of our own making..

              A Drivers License is a privilege, not a right of LEGAL citizens, so why would one need to even offer long nuanced fine distinctions regarding ILLEGAL aliens receiving Drivers Licenses? They are not even in the US legally, & we're debating about offering them a Drivers License?!?

              Beach, you are one of my favorite posters here, & you are Sherriff Andy Taylor, & I'm your son Opie...but Paw sometimes you revert to Moonbat logic & even though I want to be a good son, I just have to point that out ;-)

               

              Illegal immigrants are deportable under Immigration and Nationality Act Section 237 (a)(1)(B) which says:"Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this Act or any other law of the United States is deportable."

              Report Abuse
    • Author by Buzzramjet (November 17, 2007 1:33 pm ET)
         

      I was watching and could not believe Obama just didn't answer yes or no. I do know he favors DL for illegal aliens but that is because he is, like most democrats, pandering for the latino vote.

      But on stage he just went off on this wierd tangent, and it hurt him. Why are politicians so danged stupid when it comes to simple questions. All he had to do was say yes but instead he went off on his usual campaignspeak and lost points badly.

      Lord please grant us this one wish, get Gore to change his mind and get back his rightful office of President of the United States.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by atheist (November 17, 2007 3:24 pm ET)
         

      I think we need to all agree on what "waffling" means !  It seems to some, it means to providing conflicting statements.  But that's not necessarily so.  If you check various definitions you find that waffling really means being unclear, which could be from giving conflicting statements OR from being excessively wordy and dancing around an issue.

      MMFA appears to be concentrating on the conflicting statements type of waffling.  Tommy, IMO, has it right, he's focusing on the more generic waffling of being unclear.

      And now we're back to Hillary's complaint from the Philly debate, that a complex issue deserves more than just a 'yes' or 'no' answer, which appears to be Obama's "gotcha" this time as he attempted to provide an appropriately complex answer and then he's accused of waffling !  This is really ridiculous, as if every issue can be discussed and decided in 3 or 4 words !

      I don't find fault in Obama's debate answer, but I do find fault in his criticism of Hillary's answer in the Philly debate, because he accused her of doing something wrong and yet did exactly the same thing at the subsequent debate.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sloanm2123653 (November 17, 2007 5:39 pm ET)
         

      To all the commenters who said Obama "waffled" on the driver's license question:

       

      Did you read the article or listen to what he said?

       

      That is all.  

      Report Abuse
    • Author by katharineno (November 18, 2007 4:53 am ET)
         

       Senator Obama said

      When I was a state senator in Illinois, I voted to require that illegal aliens get trained, get a license, get insurance to protect public safety. That was my intention.

      Then he said:

      Look, I have already said, I support the notion that we have to deal with public safety and that driver's licenses at the state level can make that happen.

      Then he said yes.  Where is the waffling here?  His comment that 'Im not proposing that that's what we do', was in response to Wolf's larger question 'assuming -- there isn't going to be comprehensive immigration reform.'  As Obama said later in the debate, he took issue with Blitzer's framing of this question, and several others, as an assumption that there could be no progress, no comprehensive solutions, and therefore all answers to political questions have to be simple yes or no responses.  Obama never changed his response to the question, unlike Hillary in the previous debate.  He simply sought to frame it in a larger context, and Blitzer looked amateurish.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by skiploader1111 (November 18, 2007 7:04 am ET)
         

      The decision to say that Obama waffled in this debate was made before the debate even happened.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by skiploader1111 (November 18, 2007 7:07 am ET)
           

        Plus Carville's right.  The question was not out of left field.  He already knew ahead of time what subject to call Obama a waffler for.

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.