CNN, Chicago Tribune uncritically reported Hastert's claim that he "tried [his] best" to restore "civility"
SUMMARY: On The Situation Room, Dana Bash said that former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, who is resigning, "presided over a politically polarizing era. He said that was his biggest regret." A November 16 Chicago Tribune article also reported that Hastert "bemoaned the 'pool of bitterness' he believes exists in the nation's capital and urged his colleagues to try and work together in civility after he is gone." But neither Bash nor the Tribune noted Hastert's own history of partisan attacks.
On the November 15 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, congressional correspondent Dana Bash said that former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL), who is resigning, "presided over a politically polarizing era. He said that was his biggest regret." Bash showed a video clip of Hastert stating: "I continue to worry about the breakdown of civility in our political discourse. I tried my best, but I wish I had been more successful." Also, a November 16 Chicago Tribune article headlined "Hastert urges Capitol Hill civility in farewell" reported that Hastert "bemoaned the 'pool of bitterness' he believes exists in the nation's capital and urged his colleagues to try and work together in civility after he is gone."
But neither Bash nor the Tribune noted Hastert's own history of partisan attacks, which includes the following:
- As the Associated Press noted in September 2006, following a vote on the Military Commissions Act, Hastert issued a written statement that said: "Democrat [sic] minority leader Nancy Pelosi and 159 of her Democrat colleagues voted today in favor of more rights for terrorists. ... So the same terrorists who plan to harm innocent Americans and their freedom worldwide would be coddled, if we followed the Democrat plan." The bill lifted habeas corpus protections for non-U.S. citizens, effectively granting the president the authority to detain any non-citizen in the United States or outside, without the ability to challenge his or her detention under the habeas corpus protections of the U.S. Constitution.
- As the blog Think Progress noted, on the September 29, 2006, edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto, Hastert defended his remarks, claiming "the 130 most treacherous people probably in the world, and they [Democrats] want to put them and -- and release them out in the public eventually." Guest host David Asman responded: "Well, they -- to -- to be fair, Speaker, they -- they would say they don't want to necessarily release them." Similarly, a September 30, 2006, Los Angeles Times news analysis noted that "[n]o Democrat in Congress has called for releasing the detainees considered most dangerous at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, or proposed that the United States surrender to terrorists."
- In a September 24, 2004, Washington Post analysis, Washington Post staff writer Dana Milbank noted that Hastert "said at a GOP fundraiser: 'I don't have data or intelligence to tell me one thing or another, [but] I would think they would be more apt to go [for] somebody who would file a lawsuit with the World Court or something rather than respond with troops.' Asked whether he believed al Qaeda would be more successful under a Kerry presidency, Hastert said: 'That's my opinion, yes.' "
- As Media Matters for America noted, following Rep. John P. Murtha's (D-PA) call for a withdrawal from Iraq on November 17, 2005, Hastert released a statement that said:
I am saddened by the comments made today by Rep. Murtha. It is clear that as Nancy Pelosi's top lieutenant on armed services, Rep. Murtha and Democratic leaders have adopted a policy of cut and run.
[...]
Rep. Murtha and other Democrats want us to retreat. They want us to wave the white flag of surrender to the terrorists of the world. It is unfortunate that this is all politics all the time. We need to have a strong consistent policy that will protect our men and women who are fighting to protect us overseas. We must not cower like European nations who are now fighting terrorists on their soil.
This is the highest insult to the brave men and women serving overseas.
CNN White House correspondent Suzanne Malveaux noted Hastert's comment on the November 17, 2005, edition of The Situation Room.
In contrast to the CNN and Tribune reports, in a November 15 post on the Politico's blog The Crypt, staff writer Patrick O'Connor wrote that "the understated former speaker urged his colleagues to restore civility to an institution that has grown rife with partisan squabbling, even though much of that slide occurred during his tenure atop the House."
From the 4 p.m. ET hour of the November 15 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
BLITZER: Hastert's seat is one of several held by the GOP that will be up for grabs in the coming election. The fact that the party is scrambling to hold on to what it has, that's a fact that has emerged in recent weeks and months.
Our congressional correspondent Dana Bash is joining us now. She's back in Washington. Dana, can we expect Hastert to be gone by the first of the year?
BASH: Apparently so, Wolf. And, you know, Dennis Hastert, he was really a beneficiary of the Republican rise of the 1990s, but today, he's very much a symbol of its fall from grace and continuing struggles.
[begin video clip]
BASH: A rare moment of bipartisanship for a farewell address from the longest-serving Republican speaker of the House.
HASTERT: After 21 years of serving the people of Illinois in this house, the time has come for me to make my last speech from this podium.
BASH: Dennis Hastert was an accidental speaker, thrust into the job in the wake of scandal, and presided over a politically polarizing era. He said that was his biggest regret.
HASTERT: I continue to worry about the breakdown of civility in our political discourse. I tried my best, but I wish I had been more successful.
BASH: Hastert was speaker when Republicans lost the House last year. That he is quitting Congress in the middle of his term is emblematic of his party's continued troubles.















Thanks for putting up those quotes from Hastert - I almost forgot what a wonderful and truthful man he really was.
As trolling goes, that's a pretty elementary effort there, Just Ice T. Even by your standards.
Awwwww, how sweet! Waxing poetic over Mr. do as I say, not as I do.
Don't ya just love that idea that we have a different set of rules to live by than our republican leaders do?
BTW, how's yer sis - I mean wife?
That delusion exists only among the hivemind
I love sarcasm. Keep it coming.
: )
Don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya, Denny.
Good Riddance.
Indeed.
I'll always remember Hastert for his speech at one of the stops of the Ronald Reagan traveling funeral show. If ever he cared about being bipartisan, that would have been the time. (Sen. Kerry gave Reagan credit--very likely too much so--for his part in the collapse of Soviet communism.) Instead, Hastert used his time in the pulpit to make a standard speech about how great he and his party (and, oh yeah, Reagan) are/were. Instead of calm tones, it was filled with bombast. And the man seemed utterly bewildered that he wasn't getting any applause. If memory serves, this took place within the National Cathedral, which would make his petty self-serving exercise even more galling.
Since you brought up Kerry, here is an interesting note about him and the Swift vets:
Kerry Vows to Disprove Swift Boat ClaimsBy GLEN JOHNSON – 20 hours ago
BOSTON (AP) — Sen. John Kerry, whose 2004 presidential campaign was torpedoed by critics of his Vietnam War record, said Friday he has personally accepted a Texas oilman's offer to pay $1 million to anyone who can disprove even a single charge of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
In a letter to T. Boone Pickens, the Massachusetts Democrat wrote: "While I am prepared to show they lied on allegation after allegation, you have generously offered to pay one million dollars for just one thing that can be proven false. I am prepared to prove the lie beyond any reasonable doubt."
Kerry, a Navy veteran and former prosecutor, said he was willing to present his case directly to Pickens, who provided $3 million to bankroll the group during Kerry's race against President Bush.
-------------------------------------------------
Pretty soon we'll know if the Swift vets told any "untruths". Getting nervous on the left?
And how is this for a real laugh - Kerry finally has found the courage to take on the Swift vets for Truth - but FOUR FREAKING YEARS TOO LATE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE! Is this the kind of "decisive" "leadership" a Kerry administration would have had?
Alright d-bag...I've had enought reading your comments. You are obviously a right-wing smug in the rug phony as most on the r are. Haster is so full of crap it is laughable especially to those of us here in Illinois.
"I tried my best" my ass. He was leading the uncivil discourse charge along with the reptile Newt. Hastert was front and center on the impeachment of Clinton -yet more hypocrisy from another 'family values" liar who had at least one extramaritial affair (that we know of) that he dismisses as youthful indescretion (he was 48). Truly a case of pots n kettles.
Let's not forget that not only is he a hypocrite when it comes to the issue of impeachement, but he is just as much a crook as Abramoff, DeLay and the others. Hastert is under investigation for a sweet little land deal included in a bill for his district in which property he bought - hidden under a trust - was sold for way more than he paid because of his "insider" knowledge and the fact he put the pork in the bill to benefit himself.
As far as the swift boat stuff with Kerry. It was proven in many reports and printed as such, that the smear campaign of a true war veteran was indeed a pack of lies and smear.
And since it worked once, good ol boy T. Boone figures he can capitalize on the short memories of the public by bringing it out again to use for more propaganda.
People like Hastert, the Swift boat vets for truth (there's irony for ya), T Boone and the rest of the smug a$%es like you are what is wrong with the discourse in this country and the state of political affairs...of and lets not forget shooter and the liar in chief.
Bush has the gall to chastize congress for its spending..;if that wasn't so sickening it might be funny. Go back to Hannity and Bildo and other sites where your witty bon-mots are taken for truth...but here we realize what they are....someone speaking out of his butt while his lips are moving.
As far as the swift boat stuff with Kerry. It was proven in many reports and printed as such, that the smear campaign of a true war veteran was indeed a pack of lies and smear.
If (and I want to really stress the IF) this is true then Kerry should easily win the $1 million buck-0-roos from Pickens.
No sweat, right?
Well see!!
Sure, all they have to do is prove a 30 year old negative. The OFFICIAL RECORD backs up Kerry. The Navy even went OVER it again and stands by the validity of those records. The MAJORITY of the eye witnesses and all but ONE of the men that served WITH kerry on his boat side with Kerry and the one against him wasnt present at ANY of the incidents where Kerry won his medals. Proof is a big word what has been shown without any credible doubt is that the Swift Boat LIARS for Rent cannot substantiate ANY of their claims which are disputed by most of the people at the incidents. They are making claims they CANNOT substantiate. That is plain. WE have been over this a hundred times and refuted MOST of what they have said. Ya got nothin but what you always bring. Hivemind propaganda
Solon, did you check out Billybob's link? It's more a bet (with conditions) than an offer, as Pickens specified release of military records, journals and film. Meaning, Kerry has to meet all sorts of demands, then somebody (? the same media that swallowed the SBVBS propaganda the first time ?) decides if Kerry has proven himself innocent.
TruthyJustyBillyMaxRoger has been suckered once again.And the sun came up in the East today. Har.
OBL:
John Kerry accepted the terms of the challenge. He must think that they are fair. That's good enough for me!
That's good enough for me!
That's probably the most honest thing you've said on these boards.
Only if Kerry's handicapping the Repubes.That's why the Oxymoron says he debates with half his brain tied behind his back, but has to use every atom of his shriveled brain, and lie on top of it.
I didn't mean that he lies on top of his brain as he would on a sofa or an underage Dominican boy, but that he bullsh*ts in addition to using all of his faculties. Damn you, English language !
Not AGAIN. I went there once. I am not going back just in case delusion and stupidity are contagious.
JT-
Do you really believe the Swift Boat Veterans? Really? Do you honestly accept their version of events when they have NO supporting witnesses? If you do, WHY??
Sing it one more time Denny, only more "patriotic" this time!
Yes... what a wonderful and truthful man! ;-)
Thanks for the link! Absolutely confirms my mental picture of the buffoon, but I hadn't found it myself in my use of "the internets".
DeLay's stoogeboy tried to "restore civility." *Vomit burp*
Hasert was one of the most divisive figures in America Political History since WWII.
You're damned right he was and now he's sorry?
Get the hell out of here with that nonsense.
Just another death bed conversion.
I'm amazed that poor Denny had to leave. Why now? Why do you have to leave so soon. DO I see a scandal on the horizon? Probably, cause we all know that you would try to hold on to your seat till you drop UNLESS you're going to jail!
'Pool of bitterness' my happy a**. You were a mute Denny and you were a puppet. Dicky and Junior pulled your strings and you waved your arms like the puppet you were. You were a disgrace. You allowed Duke Cunningham, Bob Ney to lie, cheat and steal from the public they were suppose to serve and waiting in the wings for more corruption are Dolittle, Stevens and that's not a complete list. We have to include the sex offenders Mark Foley, John Atchison, Donald Fleischman, John Bryan, Brian Doyle, Michael Flory, Ted Klaudt, Joseph Monteleon Jr, Robert Holland, Jeffrey Neilsen, Larry Corrigan, Jeffrey Kyle Randall, Brent Schepp Randall Casseday Lou Beres, Larry Dale Floyd Bobby Stumbo, Tom Randall and too damn many other to count. Yeah you have reason to quit now you little weasel. Republicans during your tenor were the most lying corrupt sexual deviant group to ever grace Washington DC.
Republicans during your tenor were the most lying corrupt sexual deviant group to ever grace Washington DC. Pearlene Scott
You got that right Pearlene!
Let's not forget how Hastert became Speaker to begin with. They wanted a senior Republican involved in the Clinton witchhunt, but every one of them were having affairs. Hastert was about 23rd on the list.
Let's also not forget that we only hear a republican talk about civility if he's out of power.
I became a lifelong democrat after witnessing the Clinton witchhunt. I say let's not have civility until we do to them what they did to us, or until they beg forgiveness for that witchhunt. As far as having both sides come together to make good policy, their policies suck and ours don't. Let's have only one side make policy.
An eye for an eye, Steeve? A great road to civility if I have ever seen one. The only thing that that course will lead to is a nation full of "blind" hatred.
Maybe that is so. I dont deny the logic. Yet how much vilification are we supposed to just put up with? Why is it OUR responsibility to just TAKE the attacks by the Limbaughs, Coulters and Savages of the world? Why is it up to us to continue to turn the other cheek while we are savagely attaked almost constantly by a cottage industry set up to do exactly that? It makes us look weak and like we dont have the stomach for a fight it also makes us look like we dont have the courage of our convictions. It is very convienient for the rightwing to talk the talk of two wrongs dont make a right when it is clear YOUR SIDE isnt going to stop also that dynamic is really about not returning a specific blow with another. It doesnt make as much sense as not defending yourself against an ongoing pummeling. I mean if someone slaps you, perhaps you dont slap them back but if they are CURRENTLY BEATING YOU, then it makes sense to defend yourself. When I hear the right riegning in their Limbaughs, Weinerdogs and Coulters, I will take that seriously. As of now it looks like the right asking us to unilaterally disarm. You are a reasonable guy Oscar, you pretty much always have been. I dont believe you are part of the problem and have never seen you attack our side with anything other than a reasoned argument. As much as I disagree with you I respect that. I have also seen you personally voice your disgust and distance yourself from Coulter and Savage. However your SIDE doesnt. Coulter is often on Fox News. Schiafe still buys her books in bulk so she can call herself a best selling author while her books are given away to anyone that will go to a website so while I admit YOU are reasonable I cant say your side as a whole IS. Until they are, I say Dems should fight back and not shy away from getting down into the mud to mix it up when that is where the dialogue sinks. I wish your idealistic vision would result in a lessening of the extreme rhetoric but sometimes bullies just get encouraged when they are not fought against.
Amen Solon. They remind me of the bully who is finally getting their a##es kicked as you pummel them from on top of them and they want you to cry uncle.
These rightwing dirtbags made the bed, now we are going to force them to lie in it. They want cooperation, they want civility, then apologize, stop obfuscating the truth, chastise the Coulters, Savage's, Hume's, Gibsons, Cavuto's Hannity's, O'Reilly's et al, and then we can move on. Oh, and stop supporting the liar in chief...apologize for smearing a war veteran (Kerry) and then we'll think about talking.
This tactic of theirs is typical of their ilk. They get you to stop the fight, making you think they have had enough and then as soon as you walk towards them to shake their hand, they throw sand in your eyes and start flailing away at you.
Pearlene - you are right, Hatert is under investigation and will be going down soon. Just like his pal Ex gov George Ryan.
Until then.....they should put up their dukes and prepare to get their a##es kicked.
My goal is competent government, not civility.
After the democrats -- alone -- have instituted national health care, rational tax policy, paid off our debt, made us respected in the world, caught Bin Laden, and have had unopposed power for so long that they've become drunk with it, then I'll think about bipartisanship and both sides cooperating.
Until then, the republicans must be destroyed, unless they show real contrition.
I listened to his farewell speech on c-span. What a bunch of bulls**t it was - filled with lies and misrepresentations. But to say that he tried his best to bring back civility was comedy gold. He presided over the biggest partisan witchhunt in our country's history.
Obviously wingnut civility is not the same as progressive civility. Did anyone write an LTE to the Chicago Tribune ? I will. I live in Chicago anyway.
Yeah, the right-wingnuts always get very "hands across America" when they realize they're losing power.
Unfortunately, the Dems tend to go along and play nice while they have the wheel. I hope they can get it together this time, and quit wussing out, maybe act a little more like the Repubes when they're in charge, except for using that power to do something for the other 99% of America.