About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NY Times claimed Bush is addressing "kitchen table issues," but ignored Bush's objections to Congress' "kitchen table" efforts

November 26, 2007 6:50 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: A New York Times article asserted that President Bush "is shifting his agenda to what aides call 'kitchen table issues' -- small ideas that affect ordinary people's lives and do not take an act of Congress to put in place," citing as examples the mortgage crisis and toy safety concerns. But the Times did not note that the Bush administration has in fact opposed attempted "acts of Congress" in the form of legislation by Democrats targeting those issues.

27 Comments

A November 24 New York Times article by reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg asserted that President Bush "is shifting his agenda to what aides call 'kitchen table issues' -- small ideas that affect ordinary people's lives and do not take an act of Congress to put in place." But while the Times cited the mortgage crisis and toy safety concerns as among the issues Bush plans to address, Stolberg did not note that the Bush administration has opposed Congress' recent efforts to help homeowners and strengthen product safety regulations.

From the Times article, headlined "In Bush's Last Year, Modest Domestic Aims":

As President Bush looks toward his final year in office, with Democrats controlling Congress and his major domestic initiatives dead on Capitol Hill, he is shifting his agenda to what aides call "kitchen table issues" -- small ideas that affect ordinary people's lives and do not take an act of Congress to put in place.

[...]

He traveled to the shore of the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland to announce federal protection for two coveted species of game fish, the striped bass and the red drum. He appeared in the Rose Garden to call on lenders to help struggling homeowners refinance. He came out in favor of giving the Food and Drug Administration new authority to recall unsafe foods.

Just this weekend, thanks to an executive order by Mr. Bush, the military is opening up additional air space -- the White House calls it a "Thanksgiving express lane" -- to lessen congestion in the skies. And Mr. Bush's aides say more announcements are in the works, including another initiative, likely to be announced soon, intended to ease the mortgage lending crisis.

[...]

Mr. Bush's aides are calculating that the public, numbed by what Mr. [Joel] Kaplan [deputy White House chief of staff] called "esoteric budget battles" and other Washington conflicts, will respond to issues like long airline delays or tainted toys from China.

But while the article went on to note that Bush's actions on the issues of commercial fishing and air traffic congestion "have had little practical effect," the Times did not note the White House's opposition to congressional initiatives aimed at addressing two of the other "kitchen table" issues mentioned in the article -- the mortgage crisis and the concerns surrounding toy safety.

Indeed, Bush objected to a bill that passed the House, which also targeted the mortgage problem. According to a House Financial Services Committee press release, the bill would, among other provisions, "call for licensing and registration of mortgage originators, including brokers and bank loan officers" and "set a minimum standard for all mortgages which states that borrowers must have a reasonable ability to repay." Bush also threatened to veto a Transportation-Housing and Urban Development appropriations bill that, as the Associated Press noted, "included $250 million for counseling to help homeowners threatened with foreclosure in the housing crisis."

On the issue of toy safety, Consumer Product Safety Commission chairwoman Nancy Nord, a Bush appointee, recently "asked Congress to reject legislation intended to strengthen the agency, which polices thousands of consumer goods, from toys to tools," as the Times itself reported on October 29:

On the eve of an important Senate committee meeting to consider the legislation, Nancy A. Nord, the acting chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, has asked lawmakers in two letters not to approve the bulk of legislation that would increase the agency's authority, double its budget and sharply increase its dwindling staff.

Ms. Nord opposes provisions that would increase the maximum penalties for safety violations and make it easier for the government to make public reports of faulty products, protect industry whistle-blowers and prosecute executives of companies that willfully violate laws.

CBS News reported that the White House "also opposes the legislation, citing the same reasons as Nord."

By contrast with these congressional initiatives, Stolberg did not report any Bush administration remedies regarding toy safety and reported with respect to the mortgage foreclosure problem only that an initiative is "likely to be announced soon," citing Bush aides.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by conleytgwinn (November 26, 2007 7:03 pm ET)
         

      Clearly enough, Bungle's "address" of these issues is to ignore, impede, obstruct, and even veto; and to lie, cheat, and steal as necessary to lend support to his perfidious actions. There is no imprisonment too vile for this debased creature, nor for his cabal of Repugnants.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (November 26, 2007 7:04 pm ET)
         

      Dude, where'd my kitchen table go?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (November 26, 2007 7:17 pm ET)
         

      If Bush is doing something about toy safety, why are we still getting shipments of chinese toys with that date rape drug in them? Oh, I forgot, that's how republicans get laid.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (November 26, 2007 8:39 pm ET)
         

      as i understand it, the protection of striped bass and red drum, aka redfish, is pretty much a moot issue, since what bush did was prohibit commercial fishing in federal waters.   most are caught within state waters, from what i have read.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (November 27, 2007 8:11 am ET)
         

      I can see how Bush would address "kitchen table issues":

      "Who cares about 'kitchen table issues'?  We need to protect the homeland, take away liberties, make my rich friends' tax cuts permanent, and invade Iraq."

      Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (November 27, 2007 8:46 am ET)
         

      This is so condescending, I should really cry, not laugh. Want to know what REAL "kitchen table issues" are? The falling value of the dollar, the stripping away of pensions, the lack of affordable, universal health care, the loss of good manufacturing and engineering jobs to other countries... that is what real people are worried about, and talk about. They really don't sit at home and discuss and lose sleep over some toy recalls.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (November 27, 2007 8:56 am ET)
         

      We need more people like Ms. Nord, Consumer Product Safety Commission, who wants less money, less staff, (which is code for less work for her) because all that extra Protection stuff would bring more oversight on her job.

      Other than that, I would like to be the first on the site to thank our president for his years of service to the Corporations and Fat Cats which undeniably benefitted from these last six years of his policies. I would guess this Administration is finally getting off its knees and backs and has looked ON THE TABLE to see what Americans see. What the hell, a couple of fish, a couple of toys and a couple of mortagages, our President cares about important daily items that face America but my question remains,,With all that is going on, lying/cover-up about the Plame incident, the surge in Afghanistan, going to hospitals, how does Cheney get time to worry about fish? He can't shot them can he?

      Sorry, Truthy the FactChecker, will probably get me on the surge thing...it is not in Afghanistan where the bad guys are, it is in gas prices. But gas prices are OFF THE TABLE.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (November 27, 2007 10:38 am ET)
           

        I'm sure that Bush's policies have been really good for the Luxury Yacht industry, the Oil industry, Defense Contractors, and the builders of those huge McMansions that are popping up like weeds in some places. These guys have kitchen tables, too...and they're thrilled.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Sueelldd (November 27, 2007 9:05 am ET)
         

      So I think what we want to see from the NYT is that Bush is evil.  Ok I get it.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (November 27, 2007 9:35 am ET)
           

        We don't need the New York Times to tell us Bush is evil.  His actions speak for themselves.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Sueelldd (November 27, 2007 9:36 am ET)
             

          but that is what we want. correct?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (November 27, 2007 11:04 am ET)
               

            What I want is for Bush to go away.  Quickly.  And be replaced by a Democrat (ANY Democrat) who will fix what he broke while he was squatting in the White House.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (November 27, 2007 9:44 am ET)
         

      SUEELD, Why Bush? But if you insist, OKAY.

      Evil isn't the word. Using the EVERYBODY HATES BUSH card has been played more than the WMD CARD. Don't you get it, it is not about Bush, it is about policy. You Bush Card Users always side-step issues due to your "I VOTED FOR BUSH AND I DON'T WANT TO LOOK LIKE A FOOL CARD", but not enough of you remotely wish to discuss the policies of this Admin, right or wrong.  What about WMD's..I know, the Dems voted for the War Card is about to be played. How about unlawful wire-tapping...OOPS, The Terroists are Going to Kill you card is on the table.

      Sueeld, I have always hoped that the Congress of this Country would be just that...there are no Statesmen, there are no Leaders and that simply starts with the President, whehter is be Bush, Clinton or whomever.

      Too many mistakes, too many excuses..but Bush is not EVIL, there is something else invovled.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sueelldd (November 27, 2007 9:47 am ET)
         

      You Bush Card Users always side-step issues due to your "I VOTED FOR BUSH AND I DON'T WANT TO LOOK LIKE A FOOL CARD", but not enough of you remotely wish to discuss the policies of this Admin, right or wrong. 

      Well Prince I voted for Gore and Kerry, I feel Bush is evil and so are many of his policies so I am not sure of your point?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (November 27, 2007 10:43 am ET)
         

      Thought  "but that is what we want, correct?" was a reply not sarcasm. Your first post also sounded like sarcasm. And for FYI, I don't care who you voted for. So, do you feel that the NYT should or should not call Bush evil? I B confused since you brought it up. But I stand by my previous post.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sueelldd (November 27, 2007 10:57 am ET)
           

        So, do you feel that the NYT should or should not call Bush evil?

        Yes is it not about time the media tells the truth?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (November 27, 2007 11:01 am ET)
             

          I'd settle for the press just finding and reporting the truth about what Bush and Cheney have done. Then the public could decide whether it's evil or not during the impeachment hearings.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (November 27, 2007 11:03 am ET)
             

          I'll settle for anybody TELLING THE TRUTH..or at least getting facts ON THAT TABLE.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (November 27, 2007 11:15 am ET)
             

          "Evil" is a subjective judgment, not the work of an objective source.

          Does any thinking person really want a mainstream media outlet to proclaim that Bush is "evil"?  What would that accomplish, honestly?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by DorisRussell (November 27, 2007 11:42 am ET)
               

            Exactly, Bush has flawed policies and is a failed leader but he is not in my opinion an evil person. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (November 27, 2007 11:45 am ET)
                 

              No....Cheney is the evil one....Bush is his witless puppet.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (November 27, 2007 12:05 pm ET)
                   

                I don't actually care for the word myself, probably because of my religious teachings.  Belligerent, dishonest, greedy, crooked, antagonistic, selfish...I find those to be more concrete criticisms.

                Report Abuse
          • Author by ChiCat (November 27, 2007 11:53 am ET)
               

            Well, it worked so well when Bush talked about the Axis of Evil, right?  Didn't that solve all our foreign relations problems?  /sarcasm

            Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (November 27, 2007 5:34 pm ET)
               

            I wouldnt but would like to see them call the man a liar since this is not subjective and absolutly supported by the evidence

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (November 27, 2007 6:22 pm ET)
                 

              And it's lying about matters of policy, which makes it relevant, as opposed to a lie about one's personal life.  Calling him out for lying is certainly something they shouldn't be so afraid of doing. 

              Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (November 27, 2007 7:23 pm ET)
         

      bush evil????  ummm?  sure.  i don't have a problem with that. 

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace