Politico uncritically cited anonymous White House aides touting Bush "vindication" on stem cells, air traffic improvements
SUMMARY: The Politico's Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei wrote that unnamed "Bush advisers are considering ways to call attention to scientists' announcement, which the White House believes was lost in Thanksgiving week, about discoveries that could lead to the creation of stem cells without embryos -- a vindication, in the view of Bush's aides, of his reservations about approving broader federal funding of embryonic stem cell research." But Allen and VandeHei did not note that the senior author of the paper that announced that discovery, James Thomson, wrote in a Washington Post op-ed that the research "[f]ar from vindicat[es] the current U.S. policy of withholding federal funds."
In a December 3 Politico article, chief political writer Mike Allen and executive editor Jim VandeHei reported that President Bush is "laying the groundwork for a 2008 strategy aimed at assisting GOP candidates early on and improving his image at home and overseas." Allen and VandeHei wrote that unnamed "Bush advisers are considering ways to call attention to scientists' announcement, which the White House believes was lost in Thanksgiving week, about discoveries that could lead to the creation of stem cells without embryos -- a vindication, in the view of Bush's aides, of his reservations about approving broader federal funding of embryonic stem cell research." However, Allen and VandeHei did not note that the senior author of the paper that announced that discovery, James A. Thomson, wrote in a December 3 Washington Post op-ed with Alan I. Leshner, the executive publisher of the journal Science, that the research "[f]ar from vindicat[es] the current U.S. policy of withholding federal funds." Nor did Allen and VandeHei identify any of the Bush aides quoted, writing only that the aides are "intimately involved in crafting next year's [White House] strategy," and that they "asked for anonymity to discuss internal planning."
Additionally, Allen and VandeHei reported that the "White House is increasingly focusing on modest initiatives such as the marginal improvements to the air-traffic system announced before the Thanksgiving travel rush." The article then quoted an unnamed White House "official," saying that "[t]he [news] coverage of that was good, both before and after the holiday, and it actually helped make things better." However, according to a November 27 New York Times article, statistics from the Federal Aviation Administration show that "air traffic delays were worse on the three main travel days of this Thanksgiving holiday period compared with a year ago, according to preliminary Federal Aviation Administration statistics." Moreover, the Times reported, "Though President Bush ordered military air space opened to relieve flight congestion, its use appears to have been light."
The November 27 New York Times article in its entirety:
Air traffic delays were worse on the three main travel days of this Thanksgiving holiday period compared with a year ago, according to preliminary Federal Aviation Administration statistics. Delays on the Tuesday before Thanksgiving affected 3,124 flights, an increase of 65.9 percent; on Wednesday, 2,678 flights, up 21 percent; and on Sunday, 2,442 flights, up 14.1 percent. Delays were down slightly on Thursday, Friday and Saturday. Weather was the major cause of delays, and the figures do not include mechanical breakdowns. Though President Bush ordered military air space opened to relieve flight congestion, its use appears to have been light. About 60 planes used the military space from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Sunday, the F.A.A. said. The agency did not have figures for later in the day.
In their Post op-ed, Thomson and Leshner wrote that while "[b]eing able to reprogram skin cells into multipurpose stem cells without harming embryos launches an exciting new line of research," the research is still at "square one" and "[f]ar from vindicat[es]" the Bush administration's policy against funding embryonic stem cell research.
From Thomson and Leshner's December 3 op-ed:
A new way to trick skin cells into acting like embryos changes both everything and nothing at all. Being able to reprogram skin cells into multipurpose stem cells without harming embryos launches an exciting new line of research. It's important to remember, though, that we're at square one, uncertain at this early stage whether souped-up skin cells hold the same promise as their embryonic cousins do.
Far from vindicating the current U.S. policy of withholding federal funds from many of those working to develop potentially lifesaving embryonic stem cells, recent papers in the journals Science and Cell described a breakthrough achieved despite political restrictions. In fact, work by both the U.S. and Japanese teams that reprogrammed skin cells depended entirely on previous embryonic stem cell research.
Thomson and Leshner further asserted that Bush's policy on embryonic stem cell research has created a "stigma" that "surely has discouraged some talented young Americans from pursuing stem cell research." After stating that they hoped Congress would overturn Bush's veto on the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act, Thomson and Leshner concluded, "Further delays in pursuing the clearly viable option of embryonic stem cells will result in an irretrievable loss of time."
Media Matters for America has previously noted other news outlets characterizing recent research on stem cells as a victory for the Bush administration without noting Thomson's caveat that it would be "premature to abandon research with stem cells taken from human embryos":
- On the November 25 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, Fox News Washington managing editor Brit Hume and Weekly Standard executive editor Bill Kristol asserted that the scientific technique, if it performed as claimed, would end the debate over embryonic stem cell research.
- In a November 21 New York Times "News Analysis" examining the political significance of the recent scientific announcement, Sheryl Gay Stolberg wrote: "The findings have put people on both sides of the stem cell divide on nearly equal political footing." She wrote that Bush "has steadfastly maintained that scientists would come up with an alternative method of developing embryonic stem cells, one that did not involve killing embryos," adding, "[N]ow that scientists in Japan and Wisconsin have apparently achieved what Mr. Bush envisioned, the White House is saying, 'I told you so.' "
From the December 3 Politico article:
On the domestic side, Bush plans to mark the upcoming seventh anniversary of the creation of his Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives and plans to make more trips to highlight successful efforts to make federal social service funds available to religious charities.
Bush advisers are considering ways to call attention to scientists' announcement, which the White House believes was lost in Thanksgiving week, about discoveries that could lead to the creation of stem cells without embryos -- a vindication, in the view of Bush's aides, of his reservations about approving broader federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.
Sobered by legislative losses on issues such as immigration, the White House is increasingly focusing on modest initiatives such as the marginal improvements to the air-traffic system announced before the Thanksgiving travel rush.
"The [news] coverage of that was good, both before and after the holiday, and it actually helped make things better," the official said.
Once, Republicans derided such limited initiatives as "Clintonian," because President Bill Clinton racked up a huge number of them.
But now, the White House brags about them as points on the board.
Officials, while acknowledging a key part of their legislative strategy will be fighting objectionable measures such as tax increases, said they retain a slim hope that Congress will reconsider changes that Bush has requested for a renewed version of the No Child Left Behind education act.
"There is a possibility that leaders in Congress may realize that they need to demonstrate that they can get some things done," the officials said. "They may have a greater impetus to try to do that next year than they've shown this year."
Democrats say the president shouldn't count on it.
Rather than running on the majority's slim achievements, the party is considering an election message that boils down to: We need more Democrats to fight the Republicans.















Allen and Vandehei are not stupid. They are Republican operatives.
Allen and Vandehei are not stupid. They are Republican operatives.
As I see it, anyone who chooses to associate with the GOP is stupid.
Be fair - they could also be greedy.
"Be fair - they could also be greedy."
They aren't mutually exclusive
True. But they're not necessarily redundant either.
I was going to add "religious nuts" but that would have been redundant!
The only way Bush can be vindicated on this issue is if he can somehow return the 7 years he has wasted with his stem cell policy. Can someone on the right please explain to me the controversy regarding stem cells? Please help me understand the moral issue here.
It's simple. You're supposed to flush the embryos, not use them to (hopefully, someday) make someone whole again.
There is no controversy. (Nor is there any reason to support the ban on funding such research.) Any percieve ethical dilema is pure nonsense. I offered a proof of that in a previous thread. It's long, so I won't re-post it unless someone really wants to see it again.
I agree there is no controversy. But I thought it might be informative to have someone on the right explain the Bush policy. There must be some sort of argument supporting their side. Correct?
How Many Lies Are Enough Lies?
The Bush Administration has lied to America about the Iraq invasion, outing a CIA agent, illegal Wiretapping, Don Rumfeld's resignation, terrorist threats, firing US Attorneys, and Iran's nuclear program. Now we are supposed to believe them on stem cells? How many times can the boy cry wolf before his neighbors stop listening?
bledsoe-"bush lied"--iraq invasion,nope,no lies,faulty intelligence (same intel conclusion as most of world)-cia agent outing,the lies were by the cia agent and her pathetic husband-same for the rest of your list,not lies, instead just more of the same rants of the left.really disturbed by lies??? why don't you address the pathological serial lies of the clintons?and i'm not refering to "ancient history", just recent comments about iraq war. by the way, do you think clinton explanations of question planting at campaign meetings, release of documents, illegal campaign funds, etc., are truthful? tell the TRUTH now,painful as i am sure it'll be.
None So Blind as Those who will See
Faulty intel my ass. The White House was fixing intelligence around the facts. Remember the Downing St. Memos?
Just stop with the distractions already. We will not be dissuaded by your petty psychobabble.
If someone writes an article about a school doing well or even a single student getting better grades this year than last, they could spin it as vindication for "No Child Left Behind".
It's important not to outright lie to your cult, but rather just keep giving them examples of why what they believe is good and true, even if its stretching the truth.
Funny that Bush's trainers have to "consider ways" in which to call attention to his accomplishments. Obviously, if they wanted to publicize the scientists' announcement, they could just call attention to the scientists' announcement.
What they have to figure out is how to call attention to the parts they like, while hiding the parts they don't like.Of course they can get that across in the mainstream media, on Fox and on am radio, but there's always going to be some meddlers on the internet pointing out their BS.
The Administration will take credit for anything that even remotely resembles an idea of theirs, if only to make Bush seem like he isn't a total failure.
From what I have read about the new stem cell technique it may well be a huge advancement in both curing illnesses and treating them. But that doesn't mean we should just disregard stem cell research all together. The next advancement may well come from there.
One must hand it to Bush though. He will stop at nothing at this point to have a legacy of anything except his failed war, and dismal fiscal policies that have bankrupted our nation.
"From what I have read [...] it may well be a huge advancement in both curing illnesses and treating them. But that doesn't mean we should just disregard stem cell research all together."
I assume you mean embryionic stem cell research. The fact is that THEY DON'T KNOW. THAT'S why the research needs to be done. No one will ever know if the skin stem cells are "as good as" or "better than" that the embripnics if we don't even know what embrionic stem cells can do! And if embrionic stem cells turn out to be unusable (too unstable or whatever) then THAT'S important info for us to have as well! (Critical, actually.)
Conservatives have stood in the way of scientific progress (in the name of religious dogma) since the dawn of time. (Or at least since the invention of the telescope.)
It's as though the whole world were an episode of that old TV show, Bewitched. You know - every week Darren is saved from his own bumbling by some coincidence, which the boss cluelessly attributes to Darren's brilliance. Will our average journalist be smarter than our average sitcom exec?
It's as though the whole world were an episode of that old TV show, Bewitched. You know - every week Darren is saved from his own bumbling by some coincidence, which the boss cluelessly attributes to Darren's brilliance.
Actually, Darren was always saved by his wife Samantha, who was a witch. The only witch I'm aware of in the Bush Family is Dubya's mother.
Either that or Laura just isn't very good at the 'craft!
wzwriter----tsk,tsk,tsk. is this what passes for intelligent discourse in this lefty web? calling someones mother a witch? i'm new on this scene,just thought i'd check it out for laffs.gotta admit, from what i've scanned so far you guys are even zanier than i expected.gotta go now, lots of money to be made in the market.
Get over yourself. It's called humor. Some amoung us (those with wit) appreciate a little from time to time.
lots of money to be made in the market.- ecmarauder
"Can I help you out to the car with those, Ma'am?"