About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Shuster on Morning Joe: DuMond not as big an issue as Horton "because [Huckabee's] a conservative guy from a conservative state"

December 07, 2007 10:43 am ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

58 Comments

On the December 6 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, during a discussion of former Arkansas Gov. and Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee's role in the 1999 release of convicted rapist Wayne DuMond, who was convicted of raping and murdering another woman after being released and was suspected in another rape and murder, host Joe Scarborough asked MSNBC correspondent David Shuster, "Do you think this is going to be a big issue?" Shuster responded: "No, I don't, because the reason -- the reason I think it was a big issue for [1988 Democratic presidential candidate] Mike Dukakis was because it played into the idea of a Massachusetts liberal soft on crime. Mike Huckabee has sentenced more people to death and carried out the death penalty more than anybody else, so it doesn't really fit that narrative."

Later in the discussion, Shuster stated, "[T]here are a lot of ways that I think that Mike Huckabee can get out of this, and again, because he's a conservative guy from a conservative state, I just don't think it carries the same weight as Mike Dukakis in '88."

Shuster was referring to the 1988 presidential race between George H.W. Bush and Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis. During the elections, a conservative political action committee ran an advertisement about Willie Horton, a Massachusetts man who committed rape and murder while on a weekend furlough from prison. In a 2000 analysis, The New York Times wrote:

The furlough program had been started by a previous, Republican governor of Massachusetts. Mr. Bush's opponent in 1988, Gov. Michael Dukakis, had nothing to do with the Horton release. But those niceties did not matter.

What mattered was that Willie Horton was black, and menacing in appearance. His glowering image appeared in a television advertisement supporting Mr. Bush. The 30-second ad described Mr. Horton's brutal crime and said: "Weekend prison passes. Dukakis on crime."

The ad was put together by a group called the National Security Political Action Committee. One of its leaders, Floyd Brown, said: ''When we're through, people are going to think that Willie Horton is Michael Dukakis's nephew.''

The Bush campaign maintained that it had nothing to do with the Willie Horton tactic. To put it politely, that was not true.

In a December 5 article headlined "Murdered women's mothers blame Huckabee for his part in killer's release," The Kansas City Star reported that, "[i]n 1996, then-Gov. Mike Huckabee joined the discussion [on DuMond's conviction and imprisonment], saying he planned to commute DuMond's sentence to time served, in part because evidence in the case was 'questionable.' " According to a 2002 Arkansas Times article by investigative journalist Murray Waas, Huckabee's announcement came after the Arkansas Post Prison Transfer Board "denied Dumond parole on a 4-1 vote" and recommended against executive pardon or clemency by a 5-0 vote. DuMond then reapplied for parole. In a December 5 entry on the Huffington Post, Waas reported that a former senior aide to Huckabee, Olan W. "Butch" Reeves, said that, in October 1996, Huckabee told the parole board that "the prison sentence meted out to Dumond for his rape conviction was 'outlandish' and 'way out of bounds for his crime.' Huckabee believed there 'was something nefarious' about the how the state's criminal justice system had treated Dumond, Reeves said."

The Kansas City Star article also reported that, on January 16, 1997, Huckabee "officially reversed the decision and denied clemency, although he told DuMond in a letter 'my desire is that you be released from prison.' " The article further reported: "That day, the Arkansas Post Prison Transfer Board agreed to release DuMond. The role Huckabee played in the parole decision is still in dispute. Some parole board members have since said they made the decision without pressure from Huckabee; others, though, said he had talked with them about his desire for DuMond to be released."

From The Kansas City Star's December 5 article:

Authorities say the two victims, Carol Shields and Sara Andrasek, were killed by the same man: Wayne DuMond, who was released from an Arkansas prison in 1999, a year before Shields' murder.

Their mothers say Huckabee is responsible, at least in part, for the release of DuMond, who died in a Missouri prison in 2005.

"What a fool," Lois Davidson, Shields' mother, said of Huckabee. "Thinking he could rule the country when he couldn't even do a good job as governor of Arkansas."

Janet Williams, Andrasek's mother, said: "Wayne DuMond should have never been on the streets in Missouri. ... When politics are involved, people get hurt, and Sara and Carol Shields paid the ultimate price with their lives."

[...]

A jury sent DuMond to prison in 1985 for the rape of 17-year-old Ashley Stevens, a distant relative of then-Gov. Bill Clinton. While awaiting trial on the rape charge, DuMond was castrated. Some say assailants did the castration, others say he did it.

But his conviction and imprisonment became a rallying point for Clinton critics and some Republicans in Arkansas, who said they believed DuMond was in prison because of the Clinton connection, and that he was innocent of the charges.

In 1996, then-Gov. Mike Huckabee joined the discussion, saying he planned to commute DuMond's sentence to time served, in part because evidence in the case was "questionable."

But Huckabee's 1996 commutation announcement set off bitter complaints from some in Arkansas, including Stevens. On Jan.16, 1997, Huckabee officially reversed the decision and denied clemency, although he told DuMond in a letter "my desire is that you be released from prison."

That day, the Arkansas Post Prison Transfer Board agreed to release DuMond.

The role Huckabee played in the parole decision is still in dispute. Some parole board members have since said they made the decision without pressure from Huckabee; others, though, said he had talked with them about his desire for DuMond to be released.

"He made it obvious that he thought DuMond had gotten a raw deal and wanted us to take another look at it," former board member Charles Chastain said in 2001. "Some board members who were usually very tough about letting people out ... (later) voted in favor of him, and seemed eager to."

Claims that he tried to influence the parole board are "ludicrous," Huckabee said Tuesday.

He did say he considered commuting DuMond's sentence to time served, and that he doubted DuMond's guilt in the 1990s. Now, he said, "given what's happened," he believes DuMond was guilty of rape and regrets DuMond's release.

"Absolutely," Huckabee said. "How could you not? I just feel horrible. No words I have can help the families feel better. ... I would be angry as well."

But, Huckabee said, he ultimately decided not to commute DuMond's sentence because he wanted the inmate to have supervision if released on parole.

And, Huckabee said, others -- including his Democratic predecessor, Jim Guy Tucker, as well as the parole board itself, appointed by Democrats -- made decisions that made DuMond's release possible.

Moreover, according to Waas, several of DuMond's victims wrote letters to then-Gov. Huckabee asking him not to release DuMond. From a December 4 Huffington Post entry by Waas:

But the confidential files obtained by the Huffington Post show that Huckabee was provided letters from several women who had been sexually assaulted by Dumond and who indeed predicted that he would rape again -- and perhaps murder -- if released.

In a letter that has never before been made public, one of Dumond's victims warned: "I feel that if he is released it is only a matter of time before he commits another crime and fear that he will not leave a witness to testify against him the next time." Before Dumond was granted parole at Huckabee's urging, records show that Huckabee's office received a copy of this letter from Arkansas' parole board.

The woman later wrote directly to Huckabee about having been raped by Dumond. In a letter obtained by the Huffington Post, she said that Dumond had raped her while holding a butcher knife to her throat, and while her then-3-year-old daughter lay in bed next to her. Also included in the files sent to Huckabee's office was a police report in which Dumond confessed to the rape. Dumond was not charged in that particular case because he later refused to sign the confession and because the woman was afraid to press charges.

From the December 6 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:

SCARBOROUGH: Well, we're going to actually talk to him, because Mike Huckabee is a good friend to the show, and he's been here an awful lot. He's going to come on; we're going to ask him about that. We're also going to ask him about, the fact that there's this Huffington Post story that you know a great deal about because you've known Mike Huckabee for a long time --

SHUSTER: Yeah, 14 years.

SCARBOROUGH: You covered him back in 1994, and you say you're not surprised at all. He is a natural politician. But this Huffington Post story talks about how he got an impassioned letter from a rape victim who said, "please don't release a serial rapist," and they went ahead and released a serial rapist. Do you think this is going to be a big issue?

SHUSTER: No I don't, because the reason -- the reason I think it was a big issue for Mike Dukakis was because it played into the idea of a Massachusetts liberal soft on crime. Mike Huckabee has sentenced more people to death and carried out the death penalty more than anybody else, so it doesn't really fit that narrative.

The other thing, the other problem with the story is that there were Democrats that were involved in the original decisions over this guy named Wayne DuMond, and it's such a crazy story about a guy who murdered a woman, and it turns out the woman was a cousin of Bill Clinton, and then before the guy could go to prison, somebody came in and castrated him in his house --

BRZEZINSKI: Good lord!

SHUSTER: -- and then the sheriff was portraying the testicles on a jar on his desk.

BRZEZINSKI: OK.

SHUSTER: I mean, this whole crazy story --

SCARBOROUGH: Good morning, America!

BRZEZINSKI: Six in the morning!

SHUSTER: Good morning, everybody!

BRZEZINSKI: Thank you, David.

SCARBOROUGH: Hey, hey Shuster. Let me explain something to you. Hardball comes on after people have been awake for about 14 hours. Morning Joe --

SHUSTER: Maybe --

BRZEZINSKI: I kinda lost my appetite actually.

SHUSTER: But, I mean, it's such an incredible story. And then there were so many --

SCARBOROUGH: Donuts across America have just been spit across breakfast tables.

BRZEZINSKI: But David's right, it is an amazing story, and that's, I guess, the back story to it because that -- I guess there's some questions about whether these letters are legitimate?

SHUSTER: Questions about whether the letters are legitimate, but also the limitations of Arkansas' governor in terms of granting parole or clemency. Huckabee suggested, "No, it wasn't his decision. It was the parole board who decided this guy, after a certain number of years, should be let out." The initial recommendation was made by his predecessor, Jim Guy Tucker. So, I mean, there are a lot of ways I think that Mike Huckabee can get out of this, and again, because he's a conservative guy from a conservative state, I just don't think it carries the same weight as Mike Dukakis in '88.

BRZEZINSKI: Possibly.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by clams casino (December 07, 2007 10:49 am ET)
         

      "Mike Huckabee has sentenced more people to death and carried out the death penalty more than anybody else, so it doesn't really fit that narrative."

      Another member of our illustrious "liberal media" openly admitting that he's just playing along with the pre-established narrative.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by commonsenseliberal (December 07, 2007 11:46 am ET)
           

        Let's be clear, here, Mr. Schuster.  Mike Huckabee didn't sentence anyone to death.  The governor doesn't have the power to sentence someone to death - juries do.  The governor can commute the sentence, however.  But that is not the same as "sentencing" someone to death. 

        It might not be a big issue - and some of you might accuse me of playing word games or being nit-picky about word usage.  However, not calling people on their misuse of words only fuels mis/disinformation.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (December 07, 2007 11:49 am ET)
             

          And by the way, I am not defending Huckabee.  I have little respect for him, and IMHO he's not the right candidate for the White House.  Anyone who uses God in order to play politics doesn't deserve to be President.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (December 07, 2007 1:47 pm ET)
           

        To david Schuster,

        I like your willingness to be on Kieth Olbermann's show and speak your mind.....

        But this kind of pandering to whichever show you happen to be on must stop!

        The many words or thoughts that you share with Kieth and his viewers seem to be always refreshing and seems to reinforce the story..... It's also great when you host his show when he's taking a day off.

        But on Matthews or Scarborough you seem to pander your words to their critique of the facts.

        Please, pick a stance on an issue and stick with it no matter what show you are on.

        Thank you

        Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (December 07, 2007 4:21 pm ET)
           

        And he's wrong, anyway.  Since 1976, Texas has executed the most people of any state, at 405.  Arkansas is tied for 10th on the list, at 27:

        TEXAS - 405VIRGINIA - 98OKLAHOMA - 86MISSOURI - 66FLORIDA - 64NORTH CAROLINA - 43GEORGIA - 40SOUTH CAROLINA - 37ALABAMA - 38LOUISIANA - 27ARKANSAS - 27 

        Source: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=186

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (December 07, 2007 4:22 pm ET)
             

          Let's try that again - it didn't format correctly, so the list is hard to read:

          TEXAS - 405

          VIRGINIA - 98

          OKLAHOMA - 86

          MISSOURI - 66

          FLORIDA - 64

          NORTH CAROLINA - 43

          GEORGIA - 40

          SOUTH CAROLINA - 37

          ALABAMA - 38

          LOUISIANA - 27

          ARKANSAS - 27

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (December 07, 2007 4:27 pm ET)
               

            He might be talking per capita, and also for his term specifically.  Not that it's anything to brag about, even if he's right.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by wzwriter (December 07, 2007 4:34 pm ET)
                 

              He might be talking per capita, and also for his term specifically.  Not that it's anything to brag about, even if he's right.

              From the same source, Oklahoma had the highese per capita rate - 0.235 executions per 10,000.  Arkansas was sixth, with 0.096.

              Source: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=477&scid=

              And there have been no executions at all in Arkansas in 2006 or 2007.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by easygoer002209 (December 09, 2007 12:18 am ET)
           

        Aside from the horrible judgement lapses huckabee had regarding this issue where he thought this was an innocent man...

        I have to call Shuster out for calling Arkansas a conservative state...and Huck a conservative guy.  Both our senators are Democrats, as almost all state offices are, and have been--for the most part...forever.  Moderate GOPers can do well, like Winthrop Rockerfeller.  But radical clowns don't do well.

        Finally, when members of Hucks church knew he was running for Senate in 1992, they were surprised that he was running as a Republican.  Sure, he wants to pander to conservatives today, but that's not who he's always been

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dangrady (December 07, 2007 11:18 am ET)
         

      SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!

      When finally the facts came out about Willie Horton that Dukakis had nothing to do with his getting a furlough!Huckabee was swayed by the "Arkansas Project" sponsored by the clarion voice of the Neo-Con Media Roger Ailles! All that influence that warped everything into a Bill Clinton conspiracy!!We have an Arkansas Governor, a Republican Governor with eyes for the national stage bending justice to fit a wild conspiracy that Bill Clinton as President influenced the sentencing of a rapist of a distant cousin that some how was an injustice!!!The man was convicted with no room for doubt, the sentence was reduced by the court, and he had not met any reasonable criteria for parole, and yet some how the distortion that consumed the whole state government from a worldwide media mogul brought to Little Rock caused the DEATH OF TWO WOMEN AND A UNBORN CHILD!!How does that square with the Republican sanctity for LIFE??Hypocrites in charge of government, media, and the courts resulted in the release of a serial rapists, and murder.

      SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!!

      Happy Thoughts;

      Dan Grady

      Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (December 07, 2007 1:28 pm ET)
           

        Dan,

        It looks like to me you are arguing in favor of the death penalty. I've seen this argument before and I think it is valid. As I see it, one can respect life to the degree that if one purposefully murders, upon conviction for the murder, that person has forfeited their right to life.

        As I said, I have seen the argument and it makes sense to me. Having said that, I know many, including religious leaders of my own faith, that disagree.  Their arguments also make sense.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by atheist (December 07, 2007 2:18 pm ET)
             

          Dan,

          It looks like to me you are arguing in favor of the death penalty.

           

          Huckabee could have commuted DuMond's sentence to LWOP (life without parole) or even life with the possibility of parole.  He didn't need to commute the sentence to time served, thus triggering his release.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by dangrady (December 07, 2007 7:29 pm ET)
             

          SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!

          It looks like to me you are arguing in favor of the death penalty. // ANOTHERAMERICAN

          I have never argued for the death penalty, and I fail to see that conclusion even possible with the posting.

          I point to the rush to shove their noses up each other's arse when Bill Clinton was concerned in Arkansas! This man he urged to parole was released because of some wild conspiracy imagined hyothetically that he got an unfair trial, or sentence because of his victim's relationship to Clinton!

          How would you make arguments about the death penalty?

          I would say we should execute people about the time we can guarantee that an innocent man may not be convicted, and executed.

          Happy Thoughts;

          Dan Grady

          Report Abuse
    • Author by RoberttheP (December 07, 2007 11:26 am ET)
         

      SAVE DEMOCRACY!! VOTE INDEPENDENT!! END THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM!!

      Huckabee is another example of the disease of this two party system. The media loves him as he makes a run in the polls. The polls and the media is all the problem along with the power of arrogance both parties have. The media loves both parties they are in bed with them , and America suffers.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dangrady (December 07, 2007 12:08 pm ET)
           

        SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!

        BobtheP / Friday December 7, 2007 11:26:46 AM EST

        Vote for a Independant in the Presidential Election would insure another Republican.

        If the Independant Party is to develop, they need to develop! Party politics start local, and grow nationally for there to be any chance of success, so until when a party forms and builds into a national party the suggestion that a vote for a Independant won't solve anything!!

        I would vote for Bernie Sanders! But, he caucuss with the Democrats, so his independance is limited to his association with the Democrats in the Senate.

        I wonder why your dander is not focused where it belongs?? You believe Huckabee? You believe Ailles had nothing to do with why he went to the parole board to make such a bizarre request??

        Do you think that a "Arkansas Project" is possible from a Democrat, and if so sight an example? The "Hunting of a President" is on dvd, and quite a good book.

        Tell me where a Democrat or media mogul of any kind worked in concert with a Independant Prosecutor to incarcerate a innocent person for refusing to give purgered testimony against a sitting President!! Susan McDougal was sent to prison with purgered testimony solicited by her prosecutors!!

        Happy Thoughts;

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by onionhead (December 07, 2007 1:12 pm ET)
             

          I agree.

          Even though I do want to vote for the best candidate, I also don't want to divide the vote and end up with the worst possible candidate (2000 ring a bell?).

           

          Report Abuse
        • Author by mefirst (December 07, 2007 6:55 pm ET)
             

          third party = republican most likely elected = four more years of disaster.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by tman418 (December 09, 2007 10:06 pm ET)
               

            Actually, since the Christian Coalition (or some group like that) said that they will nominate a third party candidate if Rudy gets nominated I'm not totally against it.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (December 07, 2007 11:43 am ET)
         

      The press can knock themselves out over this, I don't care.  Huckabee's role needs to be exposed for all its worth. 

      However, I dread the day that a Democrat locks and loads this for use in debates and negative ads against Huckabee.  That will be the day that this truly turns into Huckabee's "Willie Horton".

      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (December 07, 2007 12:22 pm ET)
         

      I love it.  They did it - bad.  We do it - good. 

      That's all this is. 

      Raise hell when it happens to a democrat, but give your guy a pass when the same thigns happens.  This right-wing hypocrasy has been going on for over 30 years now.  It's nice that someone's finally calling them out on it.  KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK MMFA!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (December 07, 2007 12:26 pm ET)
         

      Huckabee's role in the release of a convicted rapist should be examined. So far I've heard him on 3 separate interviews talk around it.

      However, Shuster's remarks are likely spot on. Right or wrong, I think he's correct about this not sticking to Huckabee the way Horton stuck to Dukakis. Like it or not the perception about Massachusetts being Liberal & soft on crime is real. I live there, so I can verify that.

      I'm a tad worried about Huckabee actually winning the Republican nomination [weirder things have happened.]

      To me the guy is Gomer Pyle in a suit.

      I don't want to wake up the morning after the election & see this guy on TV saying:

      "Surprise, surprise, surprise!".

      Report Abuse
      • Author by chin music (December 07, 2007 12:52 pm ET)
           

        Hey, wait a minute!  Gomer Pyle was a genuine, good-hearted person, without a spiteful or deceitful bone in his fictional body.  Your comparison to huckabee is an insult to Pyle's non-hypocritical nature.  Shaza-am!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (December 07, 2007 1:03 pm ET)
             

          Gomer Pyle was a private, not the commander-in-chief.  I think there was a reason for that.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by chin music (December 07, 2007 1:09 pm ET)
               

            Yes, and the same reason applies to huckabee.  If I had to pick one to be my next door neighbor, it's Pyle, hands down!

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Eddy3957 (December 07, 2007 7:38 pm ET)
                 

              I‘d take Gomer over him also, but not just for a neighbor, for President.  He was motivated to do the right thing, not just the right thing for himself.  He often got things wrong, but his heart was in the right place at the least.  

              The harder question for me is Gomer versus Clinton or Obama, but I’d still take Gomer.  Nobody owned Gomer.  He wouldn’t do the bidding of foreign interests at Americas’ expense.  It’s impossible to imagine Gomer selling out his hometown Mayberry and by extension a President Pyle wouldn’t sell out his country either.

               

              Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (December 07, 2007 2:10 pm ET)
             

          Yeah Chin you're right, Gomer was a sweet kid.

          I guess I should have said Huck is trying to be Gomer Pyle. All go-lly shucks wow. But I think folks are wising up to him.

          Actually I do think Huckabee & Gomer kinda look alike. Especially the mouth/smile/teeth. Check that out next time Huck is on the screen ;-)

          Report Abuse
          • Author by JimmyCraghorn (December 07, 2007 6:22 pm ET)
               

            Pretty soon he'll be singing "Impossible Dream" and begging for a liver transplant.

             

            Report Abuse
      • Author by anotheramerican (December 07, 2007 1:58 pm ET)
           

        Jeter,

        I agree with you that this incident probably will not stick to Huckabee.  The reason being that today there are so many other outlets, (MMFA being one,) where issues like this can be fleshed out. We now have blogs and websites devoted to claims and counter claims of each candidate. 

        Perhaps Dukakis was falsely tagged with being soft on crime. That may be. I always thought the Willie Horton thing was overblown from the start. I personally never paid any attention to it, but maybe others did.

        Since then we have seen the SBVT and the rise of MMFA, Drudge, Daily Kos, Huffington Post, 24/7 newscycles etc. I believe it is much harder today to let impressions like that stick.  Some may argue the SBVT's stuck, but I would hope candidates have learned that Kerry's non-response response is the wrong way to go.

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by friedbergboy1422 (December 07, 2007 2:35 pm ET)
             

          AA,

          Do you think this story SHOULD stick to Huckabee?  He has lied about it and no matter why he did what he did, tragedy ensued.  Shouldn't he be asked to explain it?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (December 07, 2007 4:19 pm ET)
               

            Fried,

            You may be correct in your analysis. I am really not so interested in the pardon story at this point to investigate the claims and counter claims.  I figure if this story has legs, it'll stay on the front burner long enough and will become an issue worthy of my time. If there is a real scandal and it sticks, I suspect Huckabee will drop as fast as he rose.

            I am only now gradually raising my interest in the Republican candidates and policy issues as we get closer to January. 

            At this point, iIt is readily apparent to me that  the pardon was a huge mistake. (To put it mildly. I don't want to understate the tragedy.) What concerns me more is Huckabee's policy on capital punishment and the related law-and-order issues. That is something I'll have to investigate and compare.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by friedbergboy1422 (December 07, 2007 5:10 pm ET)
                 

              AA,

              If you have time, and I know its a long, long article, you should read the HuffPo expose:

              http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/04/documents-expose-huckabee_n_75362.html

              Even the American Spectator thought it was well done.  I am guessing the story won't have legs because of the dismissive tone of the media so far.  I wouldn't be surprised if there is a commercial about it later.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (December 07, 2007 5:22 pm ET)
                   

                Thanks for leaving that link Fried.

                The article was an eye opener. I hope everyone will take the time to read it.

                I hope the media doesn't let this fade away. Huckabee has some explaining to do. Thing is I don't see how he can talk his way out of this. He'll only escape if the media lets him.

                This guy has rubbed me the wrong way for awhile. I've never bought into his holier than thou, oh shucks act.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by friedbergboy1422 (December 07, 2007 6:07 pm ET)
                     

                  No problem, J2.  I have always thought that "holier than thou" and "aw shucks" were incompatible traits until our country elected "W" twice.

                  Its my guess though that Huck gets away with this one, but that's purely a guess.

                  Report Abuse
            • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (December 08, 2007 12:44 am ET)
                 

                "I figure if this story has legs, it'll stay on the front burner long enough and will become an issue worthy of my time. If there is a real scandal and it sticks..."

              That's an interesting statement, AA. This is not a developing event, but a done deal.Are you saying that the importance of issues to you is determined by whether the media tells you they're important or not?

              Does a scandal "stick" because it's legitimate, or because it's reported?

              Report Abuse
            • Author by roundhouse (December 09, 2007 9:40 am ET)
                 

              " I figure if this story has legs, it'll stay on the front burner long enough and will become an issue worthy of my time. If there is a real scandal and it sticks, I suspect Huckabee will drop as fast as he rose."

              Should Huck get the nomination, this story will grow legs faster than a tadpole.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by sportsguydave (December 09, 2007 4:16 pm ET)
                 

              Actually, AA, I think the bigger issue is the possibility that Clinton Derangement Syndrome caused a vicious animal to be put back on the streets, and the fact that two innocent women paid for it with their lives. If this was even part of the reason, then Huckabee is scum and deserves only our contempt.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (December 07, 2007 2:25 pm ET)
           

        Gosh Jeter, I agree with you! I was thinking the same thing. The right wing could run Satan and he'd get a pass.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (December 07, 2007 3:04 pm ET)
             

          We have it on good authority (Imus) that Satan is already running, as a Democrat (Hillary).

          Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (December 07, 2007 12:56 pm ET)
         

      I'm not sure this distinction helps Huckabee at all.  For Dukakis this was a policy matter, and the merits of that policy are obviously debatable.  But the fact that Huckabee is so supposedly tough on crime raises the question of why he was so interested in releasing DuMond.

      "But his conviction and imprisonment became a rallying point for Clinton critics and some Republicans in Arkansas, who said they believed DuMond was in prison because of the Clinton connection, and that he was innocent of the charges."

      Is that the reason?  What the...?  DuMond didn't have any connection to the Clintons, it was the victim.  So anyone that they convicted of that crime would have their conviction questioned by the same logic.  If Huckabee released a criminal because the victim was distantly related to Bill Clinton, that's a pretty serious matter.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (December 07, 2007 2:25 pm ET)
           

        Barb, excellent point! This is not about how it related to Horton/Dukakis, it's about the Republican hatred of any and all thing Clinton.

        The case for Dumond's innocence was championed in Arkansas by Jay Cole, a Baptist minister and radio host who was a close friend of the Huckabee family. It also became a cause for New York Post columnist Steve Dunleavy, who repeatedly argued for Dumond's release, calling his conviction "a travesty of justice." On Sept. 21, 1999, Dunleavy wrote a column headlined "Clinton's Biggest Crime - Left Innocent Man In Jail For 14 Years"

        "Dumond, now 52, was given conditional parole in Arkansas after having being sentenced to 50 years in jail for the rape of Clinton's cousin," Dunleavy wrote. "That rape never happened."

        A subsequent Dunleavy column quoted Huckabee saying: "There is grave doubt to the circumstances of this reported crime."

        Because a Republican governor received political backing from "Christian" conservatives, when those same "Christian" conservatives ask him to intervene, he did so. He took his political backers over the people who he was elected to represent. THAT along with the fact that Huckabee LIED when confronted with what he did. Huckabee LIED by saying that the release of DuMond was done because of Clinton. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (December 07, 2007 2:39 pm ET)
             

          It is possible that DuMond didn't commit the crime.  I haven't read everything on the story yet, so I have yet to see what the "questionable" aspect of the case was supposed to be.

          I'm curious if there aren't other cases where Huckabee received appeals, convictions that were even more questionable, where he ignored those pleas.  If that's the case, then the only reason I can see for this attention is political.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (December 07, 2007 3:30 pm ET)
               

            "It is possible that DuMond didn't commit the crime.  I haven't read everything on the story yet, so I have yet to see what the "questionable" aspect of the case was supposed to be."

            Yes, it is possible.  Given his prior and subsequent actions, however, and the fact that a jury found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, I don't think it's probable.

            What hasn't come out in this discussion, although I have seen it covered elsewhere, is that Dumond's victim, Ashley Stevens, confronted the Huckster and begged him to keep Dumond in prison.  She told him (I'm quoting from memory, so don't hold me to every syllable) "I was as close to him as I am to you, and I see his face every night.  If he does this again, I hope you see my face every night." 

            That seem, to me, to be a pretty powerful heads-up, whether you're the liberal governor of a "soft-on-crime" state, or the "law & order" governor of a conservative state.  For Huckabee  personally to intervene in such a case (which Dukakis did NOT do, by the way), after such a warning, indicates that there was something rotten in the state of Arkansas.

            The question is, in addition to "What were you thinking?", "Who got to the Governor, and why?"

            Report Abuse
    • Author by night-n-day (December 07, 2007 2:12 pm ET)
         

      Wayne DuMond is white, Willie Horton was black.

      If Wayne DuMond was a black rapist/murderer, his release from prison would be as big a deal as Willie Horton was. 

      Why exactly is this being skated around?

       

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by atheist (December 07, 2007 2:27 pm ET)
           

        I agree with you.

         

        There's also the matter of the TV ad.  Unless a group comes forward with a similar ad about Huckabee and DuMond, the situation will never be as inflammatory as it was for Dukakis.  As improper and deceitful as that ad was, it was very effective, because the masses tend to accept what they are told without doing their own research. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by night-n-day (December 07, 2007 2:55 pm ET)
             

          Exactly! Most people knew very little about the specfics in the Willie Horton case. The hype was built soley around his "scary" black face in the ad. That was it. And a white rapist/murderer like DuMond can't be demonized the way Willie Horton could.

          The Wille Horton ad was the Republican southern stratgey in a nutshell. It exploited white America's racism. This is a different case in Americans minds because it's a white guy. Just like Timothey McVeigh isn't as evil a "terrorist" as the "Islamofacists" to most Americans. He may have killed hundreds of innocent people, but he was white guy that had just gone wrong. To many Americans Blacks and Muslims have inherent "evil ways", not white folks.

          It may be changing (slightly) but racism is still quite strong in the United States.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (December 07, 2007 3:05 pm ET)
               

             To many Americans Blacks and Muslims have inherent "evil ways", not white folks.

            It may be changing (slightly) but racism is still quite strong in the United States

            AMEN!

            Report Abuse
          • Author by atheist (December 07, 2007 5:51 pm ET)
               

            The hype was built soley around his "scary" black face in the ad.

            It was such a powerful image, because of the stark way it was presented, that I remember it clearly decades later even though I knew the ad was a crock.

            Horton was in prison for like 10 years and in jail for some time before that.  There were plenty of corrections photos.  I'm sure Atwater and his cohorts had a field day picking the blackest one, blackest in terms of color and culture, exactly as you say, to leverage the white racism.  It would be impossible to do the same with DuMond unless he put a KKK hood on.

             

            Report Abuse
    • Author by Marker (December 07, 2007 3:38 pm ET)
         

      Huckabee is a Clinton hating repug who went too far in his hatred of "all things Clinton". One would hope his repug party would distance themselves from him because it looks like in this instance he went soft on crime.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by john henry (December 07, 2007 5:19 pm ET)
         

      the point is that if he released this man because his supporteres wanted him to then he is a liar about his principals.  If that is true he has next to nothing going for him. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (December 08, 2007 10:29 am ET)
         

      More Christian Values?

      "If the federal government is truly serious about doing something with the AIDS virus, we need to take steps that would isolate the carriers of this plague."

      - Mike Huckabee 1992

      [link to news.yahoo.com]

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Missouri Democrat (December 08, 2007 12:06 pm ET)
         

      This goes to show that most republicans hate the Clinton's just for being the Clinton's. By the way Romney may have a similar albatross hanging around his neck. Apparently one of the judges he picked released a known criminal and he moved to Washington state where he proceeded to murder a newly wed couple. Sorry I don't have the links for the story but you can find them on the Seattle Post Intelligencer's website. Hopefully one or both of these incidents will stick to either candidate.

      Report Abuse