MSNBC's Brzezinski praised Huckabee as "honest" despite his documented deceptions in response to AIDS controversy
SUMMARY: On Morning Joe, while discussing the controversy surrounding Mike Huckabee's 1992 statements about AIDS, Mika Brzezinski praised Huckabee for being "charming," "authentic," and "honest," and stated that the way he's handling the issue is "brilliant." In fact, Huckabee has claimed that he "didn't say that we should quarantine" AIDS patients, and he has asserted that "[t]here was still so much confusion about HIV transmission" at the time he made the statements in question. But as several news outlets pointed out, by 1992, it was widely known that AIDS could not be transmitted via casual contact.
On the December 10 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, while discussing the controversy surrounding Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee's 1992 statements about AIDS, co-host Mika Brzezinski praised Huckabee for being "charming," "authentic," and "honest." She further said that the way he's handling the controversy surrounding the statements, which he made on a 1992 Associated Press candidate questionnaire during his bid for a U.S. Senate seat in Arkansas, is "brilliant" and predicted that "his response to" the controversy is "going to be effective in a positive way." According to the AP, in 1992, Huckabee wrote on the questionnaire, "If the federal government is truly serious about doing something with the AIDS virus, we need to take steps that would isolate the carriers of this plague." But in purporting to explain that comment, he recently claimed that he "didn't say that we should quarantine" AIDS patients, and he has asserted that "[t]here was still so much confusion about HIV transmission" at the time he made the statements in question. In fact, as several news outlets pointed out, by 1992, it was widely known that AIDS could not be transmitted via casual contact.
After Brzezinski brought up the AIDS controversy, guest host Willie Geist -- who described Huckabee as "our old friend" -- went on to state: "[H]e answered a questionnaire in 1992 when he was running for Senate, and he said, basically, that 'we need to take steps that would isolate the carriers of this plague' ... [t]alking about AIDS. He went on to say that 'homosexuality is an aberrant, unnatural, and sinful lifestyle.' " MSNBC then aired a brief clip of Huckabee responding to the controversy on the December 9 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday. After Geist said that Huckabee "gets points for confronting this" but that "it will stick to him with some people," Brzezinski responded: "I still think it's his response to it though that's going to be effective in a positive way, because unlike some of the other candidates, who I think are, whether it's fair or not, have an aura of being duplicitous and contrived. This guy just shoots from the hip, and is like: 'Yup, I said it. Can't help ya. I'm not going to change it. It was the time. I probably would say it differently today.' He just throws it out there." Brzezinski further stated, "[I]n terms of these issues, and things he said back in 1992, the way he's handling them is brilliant. And ... he's just charming and authentic and honest."
However, during the same Fox News Sunday appearance briefly clipped during the Morning Joe segment, Huckabee denied that he called for a quarantine of AIDS patients in 1992. Huckabee stated: "I didn't say that we should quarantine. I said it was the first time in public health protocols that when we had an infectious disease and we didn't really know just how extensive and how dramatic it could be and the impact of it, that we didn't isolate the carrier." But, as the blog Think Progress noted, according to a December 8 AP article, Huckabee wrote on the 1992 questionnaire:
If the federal government is truly serious about doing something with the AIDS virus, we need to take steps that would isolate the carriers of this plague. It is difficult to understand the public policy towards AIDS. It is the first time in the history of civilization in which the carriers of a genuine plague have not been isolated from the general population, and in which this deadly disease for which there is no cure is being treated as a civil rights issue instead of the true health crisis it represents.
Furthermore, in a December 8 statement responding to the controversy, Huckabee asserted: "There was still too much confusion about HIV transmission in those early years." However, as the December 8 AP article noted, "When Huckabee wrote his answers in 1992, it was common knowledge that AIDS could not be spread by casual contact." A December 9 New York Times article similarly reported, "[B]y the time Mr. Huckabee answered the A.P. survey, it was well established that the virus could not be spread through casual contact." Indeed, as Media Matters for America noted, a December 11, 1991, USA Today article reported that, according to the Centers for Disease Control, AIDS is not "transmitted by casual contact -- including touching, living in the same house, breathing the same air, being coughed on or eating food prepared by an infected person.
In addition, in his December 8 statement, Huckabee asserted that the positions in question were recorded "almost 20 years" ago. In fact, his statements about AIDS on the AP questionnaire were made in 1992 -- much closer to 15 years ago than 20. From the statement:
In the late 80's and early 90's we were still learning about the virus that causes AIDS. My concern, as a Senate candidate at the time, was to deal with the virus using the same public health protocols that medical science and public health professionals would use with any infectious disease.
Before a disease can be cured and contained we need to know exactly how and with near certainty what level of contact transmits the disease. There was still too much confusion about HIV transmission in those early years. Recall that in 1991, Kimberly Bergalis testified in front of Congress after contracting HIV from her dentist, and that summer a study was published showing that HIV was transmitted through breastmilk more easily than had been thought. But the federal government provided some guidelines: Also in 1991 the Centers for Disease Control recommended restrictions on the practice of HIV-positive health care workers.
At the time, there was widespread concern over modes of transmission and the possibility of epidemic. In the absence of conclusive data, my focus was on efforts to limit the exposure of the virus, following traditional medical practices developed from our public health experience and medical science in dealing with tuberculosis and other infectious diseases.
We now know that the virus that causes AIDS is spread differently, with a lower level of contact than with TB. But looking back almost 20 years, my concern was the uncertain risk to the general population -- if we got it wrong, many people would die needlessly. My concern was safety first, political correctness last.
Additionally, on the December 10 edition of MSNBC Live, after NBC News political director Chuck Todd referred to the AIDS controversy and stated that all three Republican presidential front-runners "are dealing with past baggage," Brzezinski praised Huckabee once more for "dealing with the baggage masterfully."
From the December 11, 1991, USA Today article:
In 1985, the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta declared that ''the kind of non-sexual person -to-person contact that generally occurs among workers in the workplace'' does not pose a risk of AIDS transmission.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which causes acquired immune-deficiency syndrome, is extremely fragile and dies easily once outside the body. It is not transmitted through telephones, toilets, machinery, clothing or work surfaces.
Nor is it transmitted by casual contact -- including touching, living in the same house, breathing the same air, being coughed on or eating food prepared by an infected person. Although a few virus particles have been found in saliva or tears, no cases of AIDS have been reported resulting from contact with those fluids. The CDC says the risk of getting HIV from sweat, tears or saliva is almost non-existent.
[...]
AIDS is spread through unprotected sexual contact (anal, oral or vaginal) with an infected person, hypodermic needles used by an infected person and blood or blood products contaminated with HIV. It also can be passed on by an infected woman to her child during pregnancy.
From the December 10 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:
GEIST: Let's look at the Republican polls. Let's go into those real quick. Mike Huckabee, 32 to 20 percent in Iowa.
BRZEZINSKI: My gosh!
GEIST: Look at that. Mike Huckabee, 12 percent -- our old friend Mike Huckabee there. Fred Thompson coming in at third -- that's a little progress for him. But also, the big story in South Carolina now, Mike Huckabee neck-and-neck, basically in a statistical tie with Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney, but, you know, a lot of the talk has been, he's appealing to people in Iowa, in that state, but now we're seeing it goes beyond Iowa for Mike Huckabee.
BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, and so, Mike Huckabee, no longer an Iowa story as you look at these South Carolina numbers, and as Tim Russert pointed out, some of the things that have been, I guess, put under the microscope pertaining to Huckabee, the latest information about some comments he made back in 1992 pertaining to AIDS --
GEIST: Yeah.
BRZEZINSKI: -- not necessarily gonna sway the voters in Iowa against him.
GEIST: No, he -- and these comments you're talking about, he answered a questionnaire in 1992 when he was running for Senate, and he said, basically, that "we need to take steps that would isolate the carriers of this plague" --
BRZEZINSKI: Wow.
GEIST: -- talking about AIDS. He went on to say that "homosexuality is an aberrant, unnatural, and sinful lifestyle." Now, these are comments he made 15 years ago. He responded to them yesterday.
HUCKABEE [video clip]: We didn't think that there was a casual transmission. There were studies that showed that, but there were other concerns being voiced by public health officials. Now, would I say things a little differently in 2007? Probably so, but I'm not going to recant or retract from the statement that I did make, because, again, the point was not saying we ought to lock people up who have HIV/AIDS.
GEIST: So, Mika, we've been talking about it. He gets points for confronting this, for being authentic, admitting the mistake, but the fact remains he said it, and it will stick to him with some people.
BRZEZINSKI: I still think it's his response to it, though, that's going to be effective in a positive way, because unlike some of the other candidates, who I think are, whether it's fair or not, have an aura of being duplicitous and contrived. This guy just shoots from the hip, and is like: "Yup, I said it. Can't help ya. I'm not going to change it. It was the time. I probably would say it differently today." He just throws it out there.
GEIST: But that -- so then under that logic, though, you can say anything as long as you were honest about it.
BRZEZINSKI: You know what?
GEIST: You could say that dinosaurs never roamed the Earth.
BRZEZINSKI: I gotta tell you, I hear you. I mean, I think there are some issues with Huckabee that we're going to have to address with him and ask him about foreign policy, because I think those -- that's serious. And if his lack of experience in foreign policy could pose a problem as president, that's something we look at. But in terms of these issues, and things he said back in 1992, the way he's handling them is brilliant. And I'm -- he's just charming and authentic and honest, and I think people find that more refreshing than, quite frankly, whatever views they want to hear on certain issues.
From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the December 10 edition of MSNBC Live:
BRZEZINSKI: A new MSNBC/McClatchy poll shows Republican Mike Huckabee has come out of nowhere to take the lead in two of the first three primary states. I think he has a 12-point lead in Iowa --
TODD: Stunning.
BRZEZINSKI: -- and a 3-point lead in South Carolina. It is stunning. However, I'm just wondering also at this point if the Republican Party and then voters there haven't found themselves yet, and I mean, has Huckabee turned this race upside-down, or is it still an open field do you think?
TODD: Well, he has, but I think it's absolutely an open field. I mean, is Huckabee or -- are these folks flocking to Huckabee? Or is he sort of "none of the above"?
BRZEZINSKI: Right.
TODD: And it does feel like that he might be "none of the above." It's now up to him to close the sale, and the fact is, you know, all of a sudden we're getting, you know, he's now on Day Eight of what's really been a candidate playing defense. I mean, the only positive news in the last week for Mike Huckabee has been these polls, whether it was the poll last week that showed him up some 20 points, ours that shows him up double digits outside the margin of error, the only candidate in either party up outside the margin of error in one of these early states. But he's having to suddenly deal with his past, whether it was his past statements about AIDS in '92, or whatever.
What's interesting is the entire Republican -- all three of the Republican front-runners, if we're going to call Mike Huckabee a front-runner now, Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, all three of them have had to deal with -- are dealing with past baggage.
BRZEZINSKI: Yes.
TODD: And the question is: Which one of them is going to overcome that baggage best?
BRZEZINSKI: My take is Mike Huckabee so far is dealing with the baggage masterfully. I mean, just --
TODD: Well, he is the most skilled orator, and I think it's coming across.
BRZEZINSKI: He's coming across for sure. Chuck Todd, thanks very much. Look forward to more from you.
















In politics I guess "honest" is a relative term.
Brilliant seems to have lost its shine, too.
Although it wasn't used, how about the word LYING?
Huck lied to Hannity on is radio show last week, and Sean told the same lie yesterday. They are claiming that two masked men castrated DuMond in 1984 with fishing line, but it's common knowledge that this is fiction. DuMond made the claim, but there was no evidence any others were involved, and DuMonds wife was immediately suspiciuous that he castrated himself. Come to find out, serial rapist have a thing for doing just such an act out of shame or guilt.
Hannity doesnt even mention what caused Huck to believe DuMonds innocence...pure clinton hatred. Yesterday Mitt and Sean talked about this case for 10 minute and didnt mention that the female victim is Clintons 2nd cousin.
Hucks not honest. He's a snake oil salesman.
here's a murderer that huckabee granted clemency. i have no problem with a second chance, but some people need to stay locked up.
http://www.arkansasleader.com/frontstories/st_07_21_04/huckabee5.html
Preaching to the choir...here's another story:[link to archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com]
"Authentic" fits, despite all the other issues: Huckleberry is an authentic liar, and general a$$. But, since Julie-Annie has seen better days, Romney has problems, who is left for the wing-nuts to select, but Huckleberry?
He easily could have said he was wrong when he said it back in '92 and the whole thing probably would have blown over. But he tries to weasel out of it, and look what happens. The fear of making his "base" sniff their perfumed hankies is much more important than doing the right thing. He sounds Repub to me.
Poor job by Mika, I hate to see people even jump on Huckabees bandwagon, this seems to be a dangerous individual. His feelings on AIDS patients makes me want to vomit.
Poor Republicans, there's not a candidate among them that passes the smell test.
If you are female be afraid of Huckabee
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/12/10/12517/525/811/420237
In August of 1998, Huckabee was one of 131 signatories to a full page USA Today Ad which declared: "I affirm the statement on the family issued by the 1998 Southern Baptist Convention." What was in the family statement from the SBC? "A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ."
The ad wasn't just a blanket, "we support the SBC statement," but rather highlighted details. The ad Huckabee signed specifically said of the SBC family statement: "You are right because you called wives to graciously submit to their husband's sacrificial leadership."
I've said it many times: HUCKABEE IS DANGEROUS.
If that doesn't scare you check this out
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/10/frc-ties-colorado-shooting-to-secular-media/
FRC ties Colorado shooting to ’secular media.’
In its Action Update today, the Family Research Council (FRC) partially cast blame for the tragic shooting at a megachurch in Colorado yesterday on “the secular media.” In the e-mail, which was sent under the name of FRC Action President Tony Perkins, the group says it’s “hard not to draw a line between” the shooting and “hostility” by “some in the secular media toward Christians”:
----
Even though it was their own [link to www.timesonline.co.uk] Matthew Murray, 24, who was home-schooled and raised in what a friend said was a deeply religious Christian household, was identified as the gunman. His father is a neurologist and a multiple-sclerosis researcher.
I've always said that religion does more harm than good - mailnly because it takes credit for good that would have been done anyway, and has people [like this gunman, for example] getting prayers from pastors rather than treatment from doctors.
It has no place in public policy making. PERIOD.
How can one argue with that line of thinking?
:-)
Didn't you just read what was said about the shooter? His FATHER was a doctor! You can't blame Christianity for these murders any more than you can blame Islam when Omeed Aziz Popal murdered, then attacked 18 more (little over a year ago).
It seems to me that if you are going to hold Christianity accountable when a murderer is Christian, then you need to start holding Islam accountable when the shooter is Muslim. Which I do NOT see happening within the media or even this site. I don't see any benefit when good liberals expose themselves as hypocrits over minor issues like religion.
Why, in this jaded and cynical day and age, are people still hypnotised by these tent-revival evangelcials? Why can't these people recogmize a shiester when they see one? I hear a politician, ANY poliotician, talking about Jesus and my bull$!+ detector starts going bezerk. I don't understand why, when some guy in a suit says "Christian," everybody's eyes glaze over! They SHOULD be asking: Why are you using my religious beliefs to get votes? Why are you using God's name as a means to gather power for yourself? Doesn't that seem a bit cheap? A bit irreverent? A bit heretical even? WHY CAN'T THESE BLIND, INBRED, IGNORANT HILL-BILLY SHEEP SEE THIS?!
I thought this was worthy of another mention:
"I didn't get into politics because I thought government had a better answer. I got into politics because I knew government didn't have the real answers, that the real answers lie in accepting Jesus Christ into our lives."
---Mike Huckabee, June 7, 1998
That quote alone should disqualify that creep from public office.
wz,
Pardon, but your prejudice is showing. ;-)
No prejudice, AA. Simply stating the fact that anyone who is going to put religion above the Constitution has no place in that office.
Sadly, more people think this quote is to his credit, rather than a reason to lock him in a monastary.
Mark my words - this country will be an absolute HELL under a President Huckabe. (Of course, ca you seven say "Predident Huckabee" with a strait face?)
He's marginally more of a religious nut than Romney and significantly more of one than W. The only bigger looney running for office that I can think of in recent memory was Pat Robertson.
Eddie,
What is your opinion of Rev. Sharpton and Rev. Jackson?
HONEST ... about his deceptions. Gotta love it.
Honestly, Huckabee is dishonest - just like all the other Republican candidates.
There is much about Huckabee that I admire, however this AIDS dustup is not one of them.
Isolate carriers is tantamount to quarantine, no amount of word parsing can change that.
Also, it is incumbent upon those who seek elected office and are questioned on a topical and developing health crisis, that they also seek out the most up to date and latest information available - not excuse it away by saying there is much confusion out there?? Even if there was much confusion at that time, which by then most educated people knew there was no chance of transmission through casual contact, wade through the confusion, get the facts, take the lead and answer appropriately.
Tommy, I agree with everything you said AFTER "There is much about Huckabee that I admire..."
But for the life of me, I can't seem to find one thing to admire about The Huck, and the more he talks, the less chance I will. Since you mentioned it, perhaps you could point me to something you find admirable...
Up until this, I liked his unapologetic frankness and straightforward responses, it wasn't about agreeing with his every position. I admire politicians who don't pander and bob and weave around issues - I saw much of that from Huckabee.
Thanks; that makes sense. I used to have some admiration for John McCain for those same reasons, until he started bobbing and weaving with the rest of the panderers.
Tommy,
Don't be too hard on Huckabee. Nobody is perfect.
Politicians make absurd statements all the time. Going back to 1992 to grasp a quote is only relevant if he still believes it. You can go back in time to every other candidate and find some view of theirs that has been equally silly. Next thing you know, they'll be looking at his kindergarten essays. :-)
I'm of the opinion that this is a media driven issue and not relevant to this coming year's elections.
I'd just like to ask the question, Was Huckabee truly uninformed or willfully ignorant? Will he get a "pass" for being such?
Spin,
After reading the MMFA article, what specifically do you think he is either uninformed or willfully ignorant?
Then: uninformed.
Now: willfully ignorant and ready to pander.
"Nobody is perfect...Politicians make absurd statements all the time". So, in your eyes that gives The Huck a pass?
Oh, and what media is driving this issue? And if The Huck's thoughts and statements aren't relevant to his fitness for the presidency, what would be?
BTW, The Revs Sharpton and Jackson don't wear their religion on their sleeves. Unlike the would-be ayatollahs of the Right (most notably Robertson and the late Falwell and Kennedy) they are unabashedly politicians first, preachers second. You may not like them (for whatever reasons) but I find their honesty refreshing.
Right, and he was also 'honest' about how women should make themselves 'SUBSERVIANT' to their husbands. Any women who would vote for this man is then essentially saying YES MEN ARE SUPERIOR TO WOMEN.........
Just to get back on topic a tad...
The good ms brzezinski wasn't showing conservative "misinformation" as this forum suggests. I'm not sure what point in the show she said the above comments, but in the 8-9 a.m. EST slot, when this topic was "teased", ms brzezinski could be heard off camera snickering and guffawing at the Hucks statement.
This must be a knee-jerk reaction on MMfA, because I have seen ms brzezinski openly mock conservatives on this show. Hey MMfA...she's in the fold...she is assimilated!
Oh please. You all know what's going on. Mika Brzezinski is a big liberal. Her father and brother are on Obama's payroll. The only reason she's talking up Huckabee is because she knows the Democrat Nominee would crush him in the General.
George W. Bush is charming and "authentic" (whatever that means) and the media certainly didn't report his lies, so maybe we can hope that Huck will be another George Bush!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Eight more years of the Bush administration!!!!!!!! What could be better for America????? Seriously, it's too bad that we depend upon the media for information - stories about policy are not good for ratings and stories about white girls disappearing are. Too bad for America. You're still a bright and shining light when you're sitting with Joe and Willy.