About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

LA Times' Malcolm misrepresented sourcing for Novak column on Clinton campaign

January 04, 2008 7:41 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: Los Angeles Times blogger Andrew Malcolm wrote that two "[Sen. Hillary] Clinton aides" had "told conservative columnist Robert Novak the Clintons had very damaging information on [Sen. Barack] Obama, but they weren't going to use it." However, Novak has acknowledged that his purported "source" for that claim was not involved in the Clinton campaign.

10 Comments

In a January 4 post for the Los Angeles Times political blog Top of the Ticket, Times blogger Andrew Malcolm, journalist, author, and press secretary to Laura Bush in 1999-2000, wrote, "For weeks now [Sen. Hillary Rodham] Clinton [D-NY] aides have been threatening on and off the record to use some bad stuff against their chief opponent [Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL)]." Malcolm went on to claim, "[T]wo of them told conservative columnist Robert Novak the Clintons had very damaging information on Obama, but they weren't going to use it." However, as Media Matters for America documented (here and here), Novak has acknowledged that his purported "source" for that claim was not involved in the Clinton campaign.

In his November 17 nationally syndicated column, Novak wrote that "[a]gents of Sen. Hillary Clinton are spreading the word in Democratic circles that she has scandalous information about her principal opponent for the party's presidential nomination, Sen. Barack Obama, but has decided not to use it." Citing no sources, Novak continued: "The nature of the alleged scandal was not disclosed." On the November 19 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, Novak claimed that his source was "a well-known Democrat" who was "told by an agent of the Clinton campaign" about the "scandalous information." He said he "then checked with another source who is neutral and said he had heard the same thing from Clinton -- Clinton people." Novak said that he personally had no idea whether the alleged "scandalous information" even exists, stating: "[W]hether there is any such scandalous information, I don't know."

From Malcolm's January 4 post:

For weeks now Clinton aides have been threatening on and off the record to use some bad stuff against their chief opponent. First, two of them told conservative columnist Robert Novak the Clintons had very damaging information on Obama, but they weren't going to use it. Then her New Hampshire co-chair, Billy Shaheen, said, not that any Democrat would use Obama's admitted youthful drug use against him, but boy, would the Republicans have a field day with that later this year.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (January 04, 2008 7:42 pm ET)
         

      I heard they have pictures of Novak in bed with a sheep. My sources are an agent of the USDA, who told a well-known farmer in Virginia who is neutral.

      Whether there is any such picture, I don't know.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (January 04, 2008 7:58 pm ET)
           

        I've seen that picture...

        Novak had his socks on, but he looks quite flabby...and the sheep is terribly frightened.

        I'm concerned about the state of our media

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Pithaughn (January 04, 2008 7:47 pm ET)
         

      Novak, Bennet, the list goes on and on. There must be some sort of contractual obligation to source these hacks. What part of lying, drunk, lazy fat white man do they not get?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (January 05, 2008 1:07 am ET)
           

        I could use the work. Unfortunately, I'm a pretty honest, drunk, lazy fat white man.It's  frustrating that I'm just one functioning conscience away from taking those guys' jobs.

        Yet another example of the same old stuff; If it's printed once, it must be true, even if it's printed by Novak, and even he concedes that it's crap.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by therick (January 05, 2008 11:18 pm ET)
         

      Novak is priceless.

      An unidentified source states that Hillary has some damaging unspecified scandalous information that she has decided to keep secret, and he (Novak) has no idea if the scandalous information even exists.

      In other words:  there may be a scandel story out there, unless there isn't.

      Sounds iron clad to me.  Did I say "priceless?"  I meant "worthless."

       

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (January 06, 2008 9:30 am ET)
           

        THERICK:

        The STORY isn't the scandalous information.

        The STORY is that Hillary is ruthless, sneaky, underhanded, vicious, unprincipled, a smearmerchant, and mean. And she's GOING NEGATIVE (any day now), which people hate.

        THIS is Novak's (and every OTHER rightwing pundit's) STORYLINE, and so actual PROOF is unnecessary to fire up the word processor and fill another anti-Hillary column.

        Oh, and collect that paycheck. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by therick (January 06, 2008 5:37 pm ET)
             

          Yup, you're right again my friend.  I slipped up and tried to apply logic to Novak's statement.  I forget that we're dealing with nutzoids.

          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.