About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Morris, Ingraham claimed Clinton's expression of emotion raises questions about her national security credentials

January 08, 2008 8:27 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: While discussing Sen. Hillary Clinton's emotional response to a question, Dick Morris stated on Hannity & Colmes that "I believe that there could well come a time when there is such a serious threat to the United States that she breaks down like that." Morris added, "I don't think she ought to be president." On Fox & Friends, Laura Ingraham similarly asserted: "[R]emember we have Islamic jihadists, [Osama] bin Laden, Mullah Omar, and all these other freaks that want to come to the United States and wreak havoc upon our population. We can't have people who break down and start crying at the most difficult moments."

60 Comments

On the January 7 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, while discussing Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-NY) comments during a January 7 campaign event in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, in which her voice broke when she responded to a question, Fox News contributor Dick Morris stated: "I believe that there could well come a time when there is such a serious threat to the United States that she breaks down like that." Morris continued, "I don't think she ought to be president." Likewise, during the January 8 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, right-wing radio talk show host Laura Ingraham asserted, "[O]ne thing about the weeping episode -- I actually felt sorry for her for that moment -- but remember we have Islamic jihadists, [Osama] bin Laden, Mullah Omar, and all these other freaks that want to come to the United States and wreak havoc upon our population. We can't have people who break down and start crying at the most difficult moments. I mean, come on. This is the big time. She's in the big time." Ingraham went on to say, "[C]ome on, this is the big leagues. You can't start crying because you're behind. I mean, welcome to politics."

As the blog News Hounds noted, Hannity & Colmes co-host Alan Colmes responded to Morris by saying that "[Republican presidential candidate Mitt] Romney cried on Meet the Press." Indeed, during his December 16, 2007, appearance on NBC's Meet the Press, Romney became emotional after host Tim Russert noted that "it wasn't till 1978 that the Mormon Church decided to allow blacks to participate fully." Romney appeared to choke up during his response. He stated, "I heard it on the radio, and I pulled over and -- and literally wept. Even at this day it's emotional, and so it's very deep and fundamental in my life and my most core beliefs that all people are children of God." After asserting that Romney "cried on Meet the Press," Colmes asked, "Should he not be president because he cried with Tim Russert?" Morris responded, "No, but I'm not sure that ... he cried in sympathy for himself." Morris went on to say, "Hillary's crying ... is 'I'm being victimized.'"

Although Ingraham discussed Romney during her appearance on Fox & Friends, co-hosts Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson, and Brian Kilmeade did not ask Ingraham whether Romney's emotional reaction during his December 16 Meet the Press appearance raised similar questions about his fitness for the presidency. Romney also became emotional during his December 6, 2007, speech on faith and politics. A December 19 Boston Globe article -- headlined "Romney has another teary moment" -- further noted that during a December 17 campaign event, "his eyes filled with tears for the third time in as many weeks on the presidential campaign trail." From the article:

On Monday at a Londonderry, N.H., military contractor, Romney told a stock campaign story about watching the casket of a US soldier killed in Iraq come off the conveyor belt of a plane at Logan International Airport in Boston. The soldiers he was with saluted and passengers in the terminal paused and put their hands on their hearts, he said.

But then, as he added a new twist to the story, his eyes welled again. "I have five boys of my own," he said. "I imagined what it would be like to lose a son in a situation like that."

That moment prompted reporters to ask him whether he was showing a different side - and Romney to respond that he was just acting like anyone else.

Nor did the Fox News hosts ask Ingraham whether President Bush's emotional moments make him unfit for the presidency. As the blog Think Progress noted, news outlets have repeatedly reported Bush's tears:

  • An April 2002 Newsweek article reported: "The president is tremendously sentimental. Forget about putting his parents anywhere near him. At his inauguration he purposely kept them out of his line of sight so he could stay as dry-eyed as possible. He has learned not to brush the tears away."
  • A January 12, 2007, Washington Post article reported, "The pictures were just what the White House wanted: A teary-eyed President Bush presenting the Medal of Honor posthumously to a slain war hero in the East Room, then flying here to join the chow line with camouflage-clad soldiers as some of them prepare to return to Iraq.
  • A January 12, 2007, Chicago Sun-Times article reported: "A tear rolled down Bush's cheek during the event, an extraordinary display of emotion by the commander-in-chief. Bush has been known to tear up and reportedly once cried in a private meeting with war widows."

From the January 8 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

DOOCY: Hey, Susan, let me ask you about something that happened there on the trail yesterday. Hillary Clinton was at a diner, she was around a big table, and somebody said, you know, you've been on the campaign trail for so long, you still look good, how do you do it. And then she welled up, and people are making a lot of the tears or near tears, and in fact, I'd say 30 or 40 percent of our emailers think she was faking it. What's been the reaction up there?

SUSAN ESTRICH (columnist and Fox News contributor): Well, two things. First of all, I've known Hillary Clinton for a long time. I watched the whole two minutes of tape. I don't think she was faking it. But it's pure campaign land. I mean, if she were way ahead, everyone would say, "What a genuine show of emotion, you know? She's doing the passion thing." Because you're behind, everybody says, "My God, she's losing it, she's lost it, it must be -- you know, some new strategy to try to get it back." I think it was genuine, but politically it didn't help.

KILMEADE: Hey, Laura -- Laura, do you think that Hillary Clinton loses big, and it's over?

INGRAHAM: Well, I think it could be. I mean, and it's absolutely stunning to many of us -- and certainly me, who thought the Clinton machine was unbeatable. But look: I think one thing about the weeping episode, just to -- I actually felt sorry for her for that moment. But remember, we have Islamic jihadists, bin Laden, Mullah Omar, and all these other freaks that want to come to the United States and wreak havoc upon our population. We can't have people who break down and start crying at the most, you know, difficult moments. I mean, come on. This is the big time. She's been in the big time.

ESTRICH: I don't think anyone really doubts that Hillary is tough enough to be president. I think the question has always been is she nice enough to be president.

CARLSON: Exactly. That was always the complaint.

INGRAHAM: Oh, come on, this is the big leagues. You can't start crying because you're behind. I mean, welcome to politics.

CARLSON: But I think it's good for both men and women to show emotion. We've discussed that before here.

From the January 7 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:

COLMES: Look, I see a great deal of sexism here about the way Hillary is -- you know, first, she's too stiff; she's got no feelings; she's an automaton. Then she finally shows emotion -- it's either calculated, which you did not say, or it's having a breakdown or a meltdown. Let me show you when a man does it and we'll -- how the reaction is totally different. Here's President Bush 41.

GEORGE H.W. BUSH (former president) [video clip]: They took note of his defeated opponent, who showed not merely with words but by his actions what a decent --

HANNITY: That's not the same.

COLMES: He gets a hug. He's not called weak. Should we rescind his presidency because he cried?

MORRIS: Where was that?

COLMES: Where was it?

MORRIS: Yes. Where was he physically?

COLMES: Well, he was physically talking about Jeb Bush.

HANNITY: About his son.

MORRIS: About his son.

COLMES: The point is he was probably crying about the guy who's president now. But that's OK.

MORRIS: And he's 80 years old.

COLMES: And he's a man. He's a man, so it's different, right?

MORRIS: You asked a question, let me answer. He's 80 years old. I don't think he should be elected president now. I don't think he should be president. The most famous example of somebody crying on the campaign trail was [former Sen. Edmund] Muskie [D-ME].

COLMES: And Pat Schroeder.

MORRIS: And everybody felt that after Muskie cried that he was not fit to be president. And I believe that there could well come a time when there is such a serious threat to the United States that she breaks down like that.

COLMES: Mitt Romney cried on Meet the Press.

MORRIS: I don't think she ought to be president.

COLMES: Should he not be president because he cried with Tim Russert? Emotional about how civil rights was recognized by his church? And should Mitt Romney not be president for that reason?

MORRIS: No, but I'm not sure that --

HANNITY: In 1978 --

COLMES: It's a double standard.

MORRIS: I'm not sure he cried in sympathy for himself.

COLMES: I see, but he cried.

MORRIS: Hillary's crying and Muskie's crying is "I'm being victimized" --

COLMES: Well, that's your interpretation.

HANNITY: We've got to run. But our hope is that Alan will be crying.

From the December 16, 2007, edition of NBC's Meet the Press:

RUSSERT: You -- you raise the issue of color of skin. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court, Brown vs. Board of Education, desegregated all our public schools. In 1964, civil rights laws giving full equality to black Americans. And yet it wasn't till 1978 that the Mormon Church decided to allow blacks to participate fully. Here was the headlines in the papers in June of '78. "Mormon Church Dissolves Black Bias. Citing new revelation from God, the president of the Mormon Church decreed for the first time black males could fully participate in church rites." You were 31 years old, and your church was excluding blacks from full participation. Didn't you think, "What am I doing part of an organization that is viewed by many as a racist organization?"

ROMNEY: I'm very proud of my faith, and it's the faith of my fathers, and I certainly believe that it is a faith -- well, it's true, and I love my faith, and I'm not going to distance myself in any way from my faith. But you can see what I believed and what my family believed by looking at -- at our lives. My dad marched with Martin Luther King. My mom was a tireless crusader for civil rights. You may recall that my dad walked out of the Republican convention in 1964 in San Francisco in part because Barry Goldwater, in his speech, gave my dad the impression that he was someone who was going to be weak on civil rights. So my dad's reputation, my mom's, and my own has always been one of reaching out to people and not discriminating based upon race or anything else. And so those are my fundamental core beliefs, and I was anxious to see a change in my church.

I can remember when -- when I heard about the change being made. I was driving home from -- I think it was law school, but I was driving home, going through the Fresh Pond rotary in Cambridge, Massachusetts. I heard it on the radio, and I pulled over and -- and literally wept. Even at this day it's emotional, and so it's very deep and fundamental in my -- in my life and my most core beliefs that all people are children of God. My faith has always told me that. My faith has also always told me that, in the eyes of God, every individual was, was merited the fullest degree of happiness in the hereafter, and I had no question in my mind that African-Americans and, and blacks generally, would have every right and every benefit in the hereafter that anyone else had, and that God is no respecter of persons.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by eweston8542983 (January 08, 2008 8:50 pm ET)
         

      Everyones getting in touch with their feelings, makes me want to cry,and collapse in laughter.

      Just to flip it over, would anyone trust someone who never ever cried, who could not somehow experience the full range of human emotion. I'll grant social constrainsts, inapropriate responses, as defined by societies. Still a lack of emtions and empathy, is to my mind a crippling condition. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by zamfir273114 (January 09, 2008 3:20 am ET)
           

        I like the way Clinton is showing more of her emotional side. As a man, I resent the BS rule that "a leader should not show any emotion." That is garbage. We are human beings. Perhaps we NEED a Commander in Chief that acts more humane. Go Clinton!!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by philib (January 09, 2008 9:19 am ET)
             

            Showing emotion is one thing. My God, the woman is breaking down during the CAMPAIGN, after the FIRST contest!!  How's she going to handle the pressure of the presidency??

          Report Abuse
          • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (January 09, 2008 11:56 am ET)
               

            Philib, get ahold of yourself, old girl. You're taking the Lord's name in vain and typing in capitals.You've gone completely pale. Let's just move you over here to the fainting couch and get you a nice cup of tea.You may even need a new adult diaper.

            There, that's better. If you can't get these emotional nosedives under control, you may vote Republican in '08.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by tex (January 09, 2008 12:35 pm ET)
                 

              HBL:

              Lee Marvin, from "The Dirty Dozen":

              "I owe you an apology, Colonel. I always thought that you were a cold, unimaginative, tight lipped officer. But you're really ... quite emotional. Aren't you?"

               

              Report Abuse
            • Author by philib (January 09, 2008 10:04 pm ET)
                 

              "You're taking the Lord's name in vain"

                Considering this is such a far left-wing web site, does that matter?

              Report Abuse
          • Author by bluesky (January 09, 2008 1:34 pm ET)
               

            You Are a  snob.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by philib (January 11, 2008 8:45 am ET)
                 
              Does that mean you approve of our future (?) leader not being able to handle to pressure of one unimportant caucus? What do you expect of her when obl tells her to "shove it" after her request that he give himself up? I expect her to run off somewhere and cry her eyes out and wimper like a little baby till someone else takes over for her. And that's the leader YOU want?
              Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 08, 2008 9:19 pm ET)
         

      Pretty clearly pretty irrelevant to the attributes of leadership, and to the extent of ability, and to the validity of Senator Clinton's ideas.

      Still, if a haircut can define Edwards, I suppose a few tears can substitute in the Corporate Media as a summary of all those aspects of the Senator's campaign.

      After all, the campaign is all about that Corporate Media, and we voters are merely the measuring stick for their success in selling another round of lies to benefit themselves and the Repugnants.

      Here is to forcing them (that Media) to resort to LHS Associates and their ilk, to steal enough ballots in 2008, to qualify for listing in 2010 (although I fear that they have in mind stealing more than the 2%-5% required to make that next ballot - more like 51% if they can.

      Which raises an interesting question: how many would sign a petition to support the pending Federal bill to restore paper ballots across the nation, until we sort out appropriate rules for transparent voting and counting, with verifiable counts? Our friends at MoveOn.org have such a petition running right now.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (January 08, 2008 9:26 pm ET)
         

      Offtopic but if Hillary wins or comes close, will the Republans demand a recount???  My God, the Clinton conspiracies will be full-blown.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by conleytgwinn (January 08, 2008 9:31 pm ET)
           

        As counts are currently handled in NH, there would be no point to a "recount": the results would be the same forever, since they will be whatever LHS programs them to be; and custody of the "records" is solely LHS. Not a single public official with access in NH, or Connecticut, nor Vermont.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (January 08, 2008 10:09 pm ET)
             

          CTG, Can you imagine the wailing and nashing of teeth on Talk Radio. It will finally be worth turning on Rush or Hannity or the skinny blonde broad...can't remember her name...Ingraham.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by RABBITLUVR (January 09, 2008 1:48 pm ET)
               

            Oh, this is exactly what I am looking forward to indeed. I want them to suffer. Let them cry and moan about it. Even better would be to hear hordes of listeners calling in and telling them that they are full of ####.

            Just listen to Rush even now, early in the process. He's all 'down in the dumps' because Huckabee and McCain are doing 'better than expected'. Wah wah wah, cry me a friggin' river you worthless slob.

            Same thing applies to the rest of that sorry bunch. Especially Levin.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by zamfir273114 (January 09, 2008 3:23 am ET)
           

        No, they will just let the Supreme Court choose again. How that ever got started I will never know.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (January 08, 2008 10:45 pm ET)
         

      Laura Ingerham and Dick Morris making a claim like this is as useful to reality as a tumor is for a healthy brain!

      Dick,

      You sick, fat, pathetic little man! Smug little creeps like you should be barred from TV. You have no credibility as it is painfully obvious that you have become insanely jealous of Bill Clinton for three reasons:

      1) He can speak intelligently..... you can't!

      2) He got some on the side, you didn't!

      3) He's not a fat piece of turd.... you are!

      As for Laura...... she's smarter than Paris Hilton by three brain cells!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by therick (January 09, 2008 12:28 am ET)
           

        Isn't Morris the one who got caught sucking the toes of an expensive hooker?

        Wasn't Ingraham the hooker?

        Or was it Michelle Malkin?

        Maybe those two aren't hookers after all.  I've heard a rumor from a very unreliable source that they do Morris for free.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by FNC Liberal (January 08, 2008 10:48 pm ET)
         

      Don't pay any attention to that crooked midget Dick Morris, a disgruntled former Clinton employee. He never liked Hillary personally and is using Fox News and the airwaves to spread his deadly venom. He's a complete idiot.

      A.D.D. Sean uses this midget as part of his so-called "Stop Hillary Express." Both these Fox News media clowns must be shun by the public. These clowns-and Bossman Roger Ailes-are Rudy Giuliani supporters.  They all hate Hillary.

      A.DD. Sean was having a field day bashing Hillary's tearing up incident. He talked about her being an emotional woman. If anyone is emotional, it's thin-skinned Sean. It doesn't take much to set off this Irish firework.  

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (January 09, 2008 8:22 am ET)
           

        There are very few people who I cannot bear looking at, but Morris is near the top of the list. His smug femmy whiny voice alone makes me wanna reach out and bitchslap him, especially when I know that the second he stars to speak it will be nothing but more of his venomous Clinton bashing. It’s so ironic that he could put down Hillary supporters as foodstamp welfare mothers when the guy hasn’t done an honest day’s work in his life. If he wants to see real “low-class”, he should try looking in a mirror.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (January 09, 2008 8:44 am ET)
           

        A.D.D. Sean uses this midget as part of his so-called "Stop Hillary Express." Both these Fox News media clowns must be shun by the public. These clowns-and Bossman Roger Ailes-are Rudy Giuliani supporters.  They all hate Hillary.

        What this country really needs is either a "Stop Hannity Express" or a "Stop Fox News Express".

        Report Abuse
    • Author by rtmesq6717 (January 08, 2008 10:54 pm ET)
         

      Is this a right-wing joke? Sadly no.

      For decades the right wingers attacked Ted Kennedy (and progressives by implication) with the claim that Kennedy's failure to immediately report an auto accident conclusively established his inability to rationally respond to a crisis. Hence, he wasn't "Presidential" material and his reactions to a potential national security crisis were suspect by virtue of his conduct in the auto accident situation. It was all about character.

      On the morning of 9/11, after being told the United States and its biggest city were under attack, and the source and magnitude of the attack unknown, how many minutes did Bush sit reading a first grade book? Since nuclear ICBM's are capable of hitting the United States in a matter of less than twenty minutes (depending where they are launched from) it seems Mr.Bush, by right-wing standards,lacked the ability to rationally respond to a nationl security crisis.Applying the standards of Kennedy's conduct made Mr. Bush unfit for office. Certainly the rational response was to tell the children the Presdent had a matter that needed to be attended to.

      This clear lapse of judgment mattered not one scintilla to the right-wingers.Questions concerning this reaction of Mr.Bush and his conduct that morning were summarily dismissed by the right-wing and the patrotism of those raising the questions challenged.The standards right-wingers held to Ted Kennedy obviously did not apply to themselves.

      Now, however, an emotional moment by a progressive is extrapolated to establish her emotional inability to govern.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (January 08, 2008 11:31 pm ET)
           

         <i>rtmesq6717</i>

        Perhaps we could send helpful reminders to all those over at FOX or Clear Channel or Ann or Beck so that they can be more informed of facts as it pertains to this issue?

        Although, I doubt it would matter. Can't have a little thing like the truth get in the way of the propaganda.....

        Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (January 09, 2008 11:34 am ET)
           

        What a revisionist attempt on the Kennedy Chappaquiddick incident. It was much more than simply "a failure to immediately report an auto accident" for God's sakes. It was more like a failure to try to help a dying person. Perhaps he did try to save her a couple of times. He walked back to the party, never used the phone to call for help, took a friend to try to save her and when they couldn't he swam across the channel and simply went back to his hotel. You don't see that as a character flaw??????

        Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (January 08, 2008 11:40 pm ET)
         

      Hillary wins New Hampshire.

      I wonder if Morris, Hannity, Ingraham et al will ever quit crying? 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (January 08, 2008 11:51 pm ET)
           

        I already got a bit of Morris whining, he was all twitchy and looked like he was grinding his teeth.On top of the HRC win, Dick had to concede that Alan Colmes prediction was right, and Morris was, as usual, wrong.

        I think it's sunk in that Hill's tears didn't hurt her, and the media is back to the cold,calculating Hillary theme.The Fox reporter remarked that she was "humanized" , and in another back-handed compliment, described her as a "technician" on the campaign trail, with an effective answer for every question.

        Too bad, I was enjoying the the attempt to simultaneously drill the conflicting  weak & emotional/robotic monster  personas.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (January 08, 2008 11:58 pm ET)
             

          I was wondering why that word "humanize" was sitting in my skull. Looks like one the rightys have been using for a while, as evidenced here by the Oxymoron's use of it towards terrorists a year and a half ago, and I had to spit my 2¢ in back then too.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by therick (January 09, 2008 12:37 am ET)
               

            It was an excellent post HBL.  Well worth a cut and paste.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (January 09, 2008 1:45 am ET)
                 

              You're too kind, Therick. I forgot to mention dirty little goblin Dick Morris' other classic tonight.In explaining HC's win, he stressed the number of women voting for her, explaining that these are the people (women) who vote on education, day care, food stamps, etc.

              Damn women, having all those babies with no employed dad around.

               A look at this chart showing foodstamps recipients by year sort of gives the impression that fewer people needed them during the last Clinton admin., as compared to the Bush years.

              That's not a bad combo, a president that can make sure safety nets are in place, while at the same time decreasing demand for them.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (January 09, 2008 8:03 am ET)
           

        Hannity & Colmes where hosting the newsdesk at Faux Noise immediately after the NH Primary and poor Sean looked so distraught over Hillary’s victory that he was literally speechless. Until the conversation turned back to the Repubs and McCain, other than taking his reads from the teleprompter, he let Alan Colmes do all the talking. Because of the surprise victory, I guess his writers hadn’t prepared any snappy hate speech for him in regards to Hillary. I’m sure they’ll all be cocked and loaded with some new Hillary venom by tonight.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mari2j (January 09, 2008 12:33 am ET)
         

      Of course, Dick Morris has always been so angry at Hillary because she ended up with her husband after Morris tried to destroy that marriage.  I have never been too sure of what Morris wished his relationship with Bill Clinton had become but it was always looking very suspicious  He also should worry a lot about our present COC since he actually broke down in tears, also or is Dick saying Bush is not fit for his job either.  But hey, only a hard hearted bafoon would make a big thing of tears coming out of anyone.

      Yep, the whole statement more probably reflects that he is the one very attached to Bill and alas, Dick has been rebuffed.  Must have really hurt him.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (January 09, 2008 10:52 am ET)
           

        Dick Morris has vowed to leave the country if Hillary Clinton is elected president.  That alone should guarantee her the nomination....

        :-)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by therick (January 09, 2008 12:44 am ET)
         

      She's a monster.  She's a murderer.  She's shrill.  She's cold and calculating.

      She's too soft to be President.

      Excuse any typos, my monitor's spinning so fast it's hard to keep up. . .

      Report Abuse
    • Author by atheist (January 09, 2008 1:09 am ET)
         

      On the third day of the '96 Democratic convention in Chicago, word spread that the supermarket tabloid Star, which had carried the Gennifer Flowers story, was about to reveal Morris's toe-sucking relationship with Rowlands. Clinton dispatched aide Erskine Bowles to see Morris, who admitted the allegations were true but didn't see the need to resign.

      "Why?" Morris asked. "What the hell did I do that he wasn't accused of doing in the exact same magazine four years ago?"

      "You've admitted it's true," Bowles replied, according to Morris's book. Morris, in tears the next morning, agreed to leave the campaign and would later describe himself as a sex addict.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/morris020399.htm

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bill from Palmdale (January 09, 2008 3:45 am ET)
         

      Seriously,  Ingraham should be set on fire. Didn't they used to do that with witches? 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by right-winger (January 09, 2008 5:05 am ET)
         

      LOOK OUT HILLARY NOW THAT YOU WON LAST NIGHT THE GLOVES WILL BE OFF AGAIN AT FOX , CNN, MSNBC, ABC AND NBC THE SAME STATIONS WHO WERE SO SCARED THAT A REPUBLICAN  MIGHT NOT WIN IF IT WAS OBAMA. MARK MY WORD HILLAY THERE POSTER BOY IS MCCAIN AND THEY WILL BE ALL OVER YOU NOW AGAIN. THE RNC AND FOX NEWS DON'T MIND MCCAIN NOW BECAUSE THEY KNOW THE MEDIA AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL PICK HIM OVER YOU AND A HEARTBEAT. MARK MY WORD TODAY THEY WILL BE KISSING UP TO YOU, BUT THEY WILL NOT BE NICE TO YOU AFTER THAT.I WILL BE MAKING A WHOLE LOT OF MONEY TODAY FROM BETS. CAN'T WAITE TO WATCH PEOPLE ON FOX, WOLF AT CNN, ALEX ON MSNBC , BECK ON CNN, MATT ON TODAY AND DIANA ON GOOD MORNING. THESE SAME PEOPLE WHO WENT OUT THERE WAY TOO ATTACK HILLAY WHEN THEY FIRST FOUND OUT SHE WAS RUNNING BUT HAD TO KISS UP TO HER WHEN IT LOOK LIKE SHE MIGHT LOSE. THE ONLY PERSON WHO WILL BE SAD TODAY WILL BE MATTHEWS. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (January 09, 2008 7:49 am ET)
           

        "THE RNC AND FOX NEWS DON'T MIND MCCAIN NOW BECAUSE THEY KNOW THE MEDIA AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL PICK HIM OVER YOU…"

        RW: You shouldn’t shout in your dreams, you might wake someone up! And if by any chance this drivel wasn’t a result of a sleepwalking episode, I suggest classes in spelling, grammar, and computer etiquette.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ogg (January 09, 2008 5:23 am ET)
         

      HoToes Morris? Shrimping bims again?

      Jee-zus! At least he could've stuck to clean hookers.

      Barf. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by r_guyab4490 (January 09, 2008 7:52 am ET)
         

      'Cause of her EMOTIONS!?!?! Socialist are always strong on defence! She'll be GREAT at protecting us from all those evil,profit producing industries.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by r_guyab4490 (January 09, 2008 7:56 am ET)
         

      Wow. A 'A Chorus Line' IS off Broadway!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by philib (January 09, 2008 9:25 am ET)
         

      "Remember we have Islamic jihadists, bin Laden, Mullah Omar, and all these other freaks that want to come to the United States and wreak havoc upon our population. We can't have people who break down and start crying at the most difficult moments."

         AMEN, to that, sister. And to think it wasn't even a difficult moment that hilary couldn't handle.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (January 09, 2008 9:48 am ET)
           

        Maybe what we need is someone willing to show us that they're human. All human beings are effected by emotions.

        Anyone who won't admit to shedding tears is lying. I'd feel a lot more comfortable knowing that the leader of this nation has feelings.

        What I've seen for the last seven years is a bunch of scared, cowardly little boys in the media and in positions of power, lashing out at anything they don't understand.

        We're heading into the abyss. We need to drop the macho, partisan bullsh_t before it pulls us under.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by philib (January 11, 2008 8:27 am ET)
             
          "Maybe what we need is someone willing to show us that they're human. All human beings are effected by emotions. " Sure, that would be nice, but when they do that you call them "scared, cowardly little boys". Make up your mind, do you want human leadership or not? Personally, I want strong leadership not someone who cracks under the pressure of ONE CAUCUS LOSS in one of the least important states (politically) in the country. Whether that strong leader is Obama or Huckleberry, it makes no difference to me. Unless either of them start crying because they lose an unimportant caucus. What a fool hilary is, and you think she is what the country needs?? I'm glad you only have one vote.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by dbeden4153 (January 09, 2008 10:03 am ET)
           

        Bin Laden? Shouldn't we have caught him by now?  I believe we've had more than one chance...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (January 09, 2008 10:32 am ET)
             

          It looks like he, Omar and other terrorists want to come over here . Wouldn't it have been much more cost-effective to have loosened our work Visa policies and caught them here, than to have spent a few hundred billion not catching them over there?

          Or are the bedwetters not thinking this stuff through?

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by philib (January 11, 2008 8:37 am ET)
               
            And that is EXACTLY the plan of the democrats when they take control of the white house. Retreat our troops from Iraq and Afganistan (but, leave them in Germany and Japan) and open the borders to everybody (anybody) that wants to enter. Then, they will give them free medical care and food stamps and gaurantee them a living wage. It's more than obvious that terrorists will stop being terrorists once they realize all the free stuff they get in America. And, of course, everyone knows that all a terrorist wants is a place to call 'home', and certainly when the democrats appease them by giving them several countries to live in, unabated, they will stop attacking everywhere across the world. Well, that's what liberals believe. And to think every non-liberal is called a nutcase for thinking differently.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 09, 2008 9:30 am ET)
         

      I realize this comment is off point on this thread, but I'm hoping that the folks on MM caught Matthews' comments this morning on that other idiot's show, Morning Joe. Although I've repeatedly stated that I'm not a terribly big fan of Hillary Clinton (and even have been characterized as a "wingnut") . . ., Matthew's comments are so despicable that they're insulting to anyone who votes. I can't even describe them here myself, because I don't want to misrepresent them.  But I'm hoping to see something posted about them sometime today. 

      Briefly though, he ranted on about how the only reason Hillary Clinton is a senator is because new yorkers felt bad about her husband messing around. Matthews indicates that her entire career is dependent on that circumstance.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (January 09, 2008 10:26 am ET)
           

        thomp,

        I saw Morning Joe this morning, & heard Matthews, & I AGREE with you 100%

        I'm hoping MMFA had a staffer watching. I'm no Lib/Dem but I'm so disgusted with Matthews for this & his behaviour lately. I used to stick up for the guy..no more.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (January 09, 2008 10:41 am ET)
             

          Careful Jeter

          You're getting closer and closer to the dark side.

          You won't even notice and then one day, you'll be one of us.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (January 09, 2008 11:14 am ET)
               

            King my old cyber friend you could be on to something.

            Just to let you know I'm no longer a registered Republican. I'm now Independent, or as it's officially called "Unregistered". This will likely please RINO who never thought I deserved to call myself a Republican in the first place because I didn't march lockstep with the GOP. I'm still a Moderate Conservative, but free now to vote in the Democratic primary here in Massachusetts should I decide to do so. And I just might. I wasn't gonna make this info known here...but hey what the heck ;-)

            As far as Matthews go, I've always excused his behavior in the past, but the guy has gotten so blatantly biased & spouting some really bizarre opinions that even I can't take it anymore.

            I don't know that I'll ever take that final step into the "dark side"...maybe if your party could get rid of your Moonbats ? ;-)

            Report Abuse
        • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 09, 2008 10:45 am ET)
             

          Good. glad you saw it too. I could only half pay attention because was getting ready for work.

          I really can't stand Matthews or Scarboorough. Contrary to the common perception on MM, I don't really think he's a conservative. I just think he's a tremendous idiot.  I can't understand why msnbc consistently looks upon him as some expert visionary in terms of politics. Sometimes he has some reasonably intelligent guests, but even then I just can't understand how they put up with his bullsh*t.  

          I mean, I don't even live in New York, but it's just so stupid for him to categorically state that Hillary Clinton is senator because the electorate pitied her marriage situation. My understanding is that she got uncommon support in heavily conservative districts, as well as those that are more liberal. Those people don't feel bad for her. In my view she has many faults, but she certainly doesn't come across as some week-kneed wimp who desires or expects sympathy.

           Moreover, I like obama more than clinton, (and mccain more than both).  But clinton won last night, and that jackass matthews is going out of his way to downplay her victory or insinuate that it was underhanded in some respect.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (January 09, 2008 11:31 am ET)
               

            Thomp,

            The ONLY true professional on MSNBC last night was veteran journalist Tom Brokaw.

            I don't mind Joe, but Matthews is really rubbing me the wrong way these days. Or maybe my eyes have finally been opened to what a jerk he is?

            Last night even Keith shot a few looks in Matthews direction as he blathered on that I read as Keith thinking Chris was an idiot.

            Matthews performance today on Morning Joe left me with my mouth hanging open. His diatribe about how Hillary would never have been a Presidential candidate or a Senator if not for the sympathy voters had because of Bill's Monica thing was bizarre. Me thinks Matthews is still smarting from being so wrong about Obama, who he was so obviously pulling for.

            I like Obama, & lately have been pretty hard on Hillary. But I'm now going to give them both a shot to win my vote if I don't vote for a Republican. I could live with McCain or Romney, though I'm not too thrilled about either one. And I'm glad Hillary won N.H., this gives us all more time to check out the Democratic candidates instead of letting biased media hype allow Obama to win the nomination based only on Obamamania.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by fromthesouthland (January 09, 2008 9:35 am ET)
         

      I, for one, will probably now vote for Clinton because she teared up.  Prior to that incident,  I felt she was too cold, too calculating,  too polarizing, and I didn't want another dynasty.  Her vote on Iraq and Iran made me discount her all together, but tearing up, in my opinion, humanized her.  It made me take another look at her.    I want a President who has the capacity to care and empathize coupled with intelligence and familiarity with the world scene.  I don't see those characteristics in the other candidtes, Republicans or Democrats

      Why would anyone pay attention to Morris?  He's a fence sitter ready to jump on the side that will pay him  the most money.  Take working in the Clinton Administration away from his resume' and what do you have?  Nothing.  Where would he be today without FOX?  Nowhere.

       

       

       

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by YellowDogDemocrat (January 09, 2008 3:43 pm ET)
           

        Excuse me, but if you have the same two families running the country from 1988 until (at least) 2012 how is that not a dynasty just because she cried?  If you didn't like the idea of a dynasty before why is it okay now?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Sams Computer (January 09, 2008 10:22 am ET)
         

      Prickface, I mean Dick Morris...

      Is wrong again as per usual. He had already nailed Hillary's coffin shut. Then the Dick decided to hammer some more nails home when all to his surprise... She came to life again in New Hampshire!

      Morris and some posts here attacking a persons great human character traits is lower than whale POOP. You can't go any lower than that!

      President Bush and his father cry all the time. It's a great human behavior. Show me a man who's not afraid to cry and I'll show you a real man. (OR WOMAN)

      Hillary,,, You Go Girl!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lorelei (January 09, 2008 11:00 am ET)
         

      pundits are mostly idiots and why anyone listens to them is beyond me.

       

      Hillary was with mostly female voters in New Hampshire on a campaign stop.  Females have a tendency to let loose when we are in talking groups like that.  We also know that getting emotional over something does NOT in any way impair our ability to employ tough actions of our own. 

      Christ, how many of you have raised children?  The mother is the one who lays down the law and runs the house even whilst being emotional about it sometimes - for crying out loud......extrapolate people. 

       

      Female leaders have not hurt other countries, in fact, I might say it has mellowed them. 

       

      I have been leaning toward Obama and still am, but the more I see of Hillary, the more I like her. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by whillenbrand (January 09, 2008 11:12 am ET)
         

      I thought this horse face (ingraham) left the planet. In some of her most recent interviews she appeared to be taking a new path. She seemed to be a little less hostile and demeaning but I guess that road didn't pay the bills.

       Listen to her phrases. She has begun to use th eword "stunning" which is a common hannity word for just about everything he discusses.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Crumble (January 09, 2008 1:52 pm ET)
         

      If I remember correctly, Dick Morris choked up his own little self on the Larry King show way back when as he was discussing the fling he had with the Washington, D. C., prostitute, and how his lies to his wife almost destroyed his marriage. Strange, though, how that story never comes up on Fox.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.