Media fawn over John McCain while covering NH primary
SUMMARY: In discussions and reports on the New Hampshire primaries, numerous media outlets and personalities praised Sen. John McCain as authentic, real, exhibiting "flinty independence," and a "maverick," and described him as "Mr. Straight Talk."
In discussions and reports on the January 8 presidential primaries in New Hampshire, numerous media outlets and personalities praised Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (AZ) both before and after McCain's victory in the primary, claiming that he is authentic, real, independent, and a "maverick," and describing him as "Mr. Straight Talk." For example, a January 9 USA Today editorial called McCain "straight-shooting" and claimed that "John McCain's decisive win over Mitt Romney was a triumph of authenticity over packaging," while a January 9 Los Angeles Times editorial similarly claimed that Romney "looks far less appealing than the flinty independence of John McCain."
On MSNBC, host Chris Matthews repeatedly called McCain a "maverick" throughout the evening of January 8. Matthews claimed that "in New Hampshire, there are a lot of Republicans who like mavericks," adding that if McCain won the primary, "[h]is challenge will be to go against the grain nationally" and that "[i]t's always going to be hard to be a successful maverick."
After McCain's victory became apparent, during Fox News' January 8 coverage of the primaries, Fox News chief political correspondent Carl Cameron called McCain "Mr. Straight Talk": "And across the country, Republicans now have to begin to ponder the possibility of having Mr. Straight Talk as their standard-bearer, a candidate, a Republican that many of them have had an awful lot of issues with over the years. And now GOPers have to figure out whether or not they can get their arms around John McCain all over again."
During CNN's coverage of the primaries, CNN senior political analyst Gloria Borger also referred to McCain as a "maverick," saying that being the "establishment candidate ... didn't work for him, so after July when he was broke and he had to fire most of his staff, he said, 'I'm going to go back to being John McCain. I'm going to go back to New Hampshire and work those town halls and be who I am, and I'm going to become the maverick Republican again.' Well, this is a year for mavericks. In case you hadn't noticed, all we're talking about is change, so that worked for him." Later on CNN, after McCain gave his victory speech, host Anderson Cooper said that McCain is "real":
COOPER: And an amazing night watching him speak. You know, not the best speaker out there. Certainly, he read -- he doesn't like teleprompters. He reads from, you know, paper -- stuff written on a page. He stumbles from time to time. But he is real, and that certainly comes across.
Additionally, in claiming that McCain's victory "was a triumph of authenticity over packaging," the USA Today editorial added: "Even when it has hurt him, such as on immigration reform and the war in Iraq, McCain has stuck stubbornly to unpopular positions." Yet McCain has, in fact, acknowledged that he has shifted his stance on comprehensive immigration reform -- as Media Matters for America noted -- now calling for border security first before the creation of a guest-worker program or a path to citizenship. McCain told reporters that he "understand[s] why you would call it a, quote, shift." Moreover, the editorial did not explain what it was referring to by McCain's "unpopular positions" on the Iraq war, which he supported and continues to support.
From the January 9 USA Today editorial:
Among the Republicans, John McCain's decisive win over Mitt Romney was a triumph of authenticity over packaging. Even when it has hurt him, such as on immigration reform and the war in Iraq, McCain has stuck stubbornly to unpopular positions.
By contrast, Romney has drawn derision for repeatedly abandoning positions -- on abortion, gay rights, embryonic stem cell research -- that he held as governor of blue-state Massachusetts to cater to a more conservative national Republican audience. McCain sarcastically zinged Romney for being the "candidate of change" during Saturday night's television debate. Polls of voters leaving voting booths showed the straight-shooting McCain, the oldest candidate in the field at 71, leading the GOP field among voters ages 18-29.
McCain's win, on the heels of Mike Huckabee's victory in Iowa five days earlier, leaves the Republicans with the sort of chaotic, wide-open race usually associated with Democrats. Romney, seriously wounded after staking his strategy on Iowa and New Hampshire, makes what could be his last stand next week in Michigan, where his father was governor. And Rudy Giuliani was both a loser and potential winner: He finished dismally in New Hampshire, but his ignore-the-little-states strategy could pay off with a Jan. 29 win in Florida, where polls show him narrowly ahead of Huckabee.
From the January 9 Los Angeles Times editorial:
Some of the same dynamics are at work among Republicans. Suddenly Mitt Romney, a second-generation politician, looks far less appealing than the flinty independence of John McCain. There, the politics of change are murkier, complicated by McCain's enduring popularity in New Hampshire, Mike Huckabee's popularity with Christian conservatives and Romney's inability to convince voters that he is a man of genuine conviction. Still, for Republicans as well as Democrats, it's a tough year to be a candidate whose principal credential is experience. Indeed, for Republicans it's a tough year to stand for anything, as the GOP remains in search of a standard-bearer.
From the 5 p.m. ET hour of the January 8 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:
MATTHEWS: Good evening. I'm Chris Matthews. Welcome to Hardball, tonight from NBC News headquarters in New York. This is the night, the night that could be the beginning of the end of a front-runner's presidential candidacy, a night that could turn a movement -- or turn a moment, rather, into a movement, a night when a maverick Republican could rise from the ashes to claim victory, a night when conventional wisdom crumbles and change becomes the touchstone for this country. Tonight is the night of the New Hampshire primary.
From the 6 p.m. ET hour of MSNBC's coverage of the January 8 New Hampshire primary:
MATTHEWS: Let me ask you, David [Gregory, NBC News chief White House correspondent]. It seems to me that this anger is hard to read, if you look at all the candidates on the Republican side. You know, John McCain, although he's a maverick, has sided with the president on the war. And you could argue maybe if you're very pro-Bush, you'd stick with McCain. But on the other hand, his personality is so different than Bush's and his person. It's hard to read that, isn't it?
From the 7 p.m. ET hour of MSNBC's coverage of the January 8 New Hampshire primary:
MATTHEWS: Well, the wild thing about John McCain is, although he's a great military man who has served his country and is obviously a patriot in all the great ways you could be a patriot, both in public service and in his military career and his sacrifice, he's not popular among the regular Republicans, the people that go to meetings and organize the Republican Party victories. He's not popular among the evangelicals, right?
KEITH OLBERMANN (Countdown host): Mm-hmm.
MATTHEWS: Who does that leave? It leaves the media, and it leaves people who like mavericks. I think in New Hampshire, there are a lot of Republicans who like mavericks. They like Pat Buchanan. They like going against the grain. His challenge will be to go against the grain nationally if he wins tonight. That's a hard one. It's always going to be hard to be a successful maverick.
From the 8 p.m. ET hour of Fox News' coverage of the January 8 New Hampshire primary:
CAMERON: McCain now has to look forward to Michigan, a state that he also won in 2000 by only 8 points. He dropped from an 18-point victory in New Hampshire to an 8-point victory in Michigan. This time they go back to Michigan feeling particularly confident. Mr. McCain has been spending a tremendous amount of time there as well as in South Carolina. And across the country, Republicans now have to begin to ponder the possibility of having Mr. Straight Talk as their standard-bearer, a candidate, a Republican that many of them have had an awful lot of issues with over the years. And now GOPers have to figure out whether or not they can get their arms around John McCain all over again.
From the 8 p.m. ET and 9 p.m. ET hours of CNN's coverage of the January 8 New Hampshire primary:
BORGER: It's been so interesting because just six months ago, Anderson, we had all these headlines last July. He had $250,000 in the bank when he was the establishment candidate. He had to fire half his staff, and the question on the campaign trail was, "Can a soufflé rise twice?" And in John McCain's case, tonight, he just proved that it could. And what he's done is he was the establishment candidate. That didn't work for him, so after July when he was broke and he had to fire most of his staff, he said, "I'm going to go back to being John McCain. I'm going to go back to New Hampshire and work those town halls and be who I am, and I'm going to become the maverick Republican again." Well, this is a year for mavericks. In case you hadn't noticed, all we're talking about is change, so that worked for him.
[...]
COOPER: And an amazing night watching him speak. You know, not the best speaker out there. Certainly, he read -- he doesn't like teleprompters. He reads from, you know, paper -- stuff written on a page. He stumbles from time to time. But he is real, and that certainly comes across.
















The media is fawning over McCain & Obama.
Come on MMFA, don't tell us only 1/2 the story!
We never hear the other side. As far as him being called a "Maverick" that seems to be such a horrible thing to call him. Amazing. Yet its fine for Keith Olbermann to say that Hillary Clinton is playing the "al Qeida" card. Such inconsistency here.
Well Sue, as I'm sure someone will come along & remind us...this site only does Conservative MIS-information ;-)
And of course NEVER would call out St. Keith on anything.
So that's why we need to remind them now & again :-)
This site is only for conservative misinformation!
Cute Lynn ;-)
Sueeld you are awesome I love you. You know exactly how to stick it.
Yikes, Bob. Keep your cybersex to yourselves !
I was thinking the same thing ;-)
Ease up HBl.
If it wasn't for cybersex some of us would be virgins.
Everyone at MSNBC except Matthews ridiculed McCains speech as being terrible, which I thought it was also. He was reading it off the page and kept misreading the words and making mistakes.
Matthews defended him by saying something to the effect of blah blah blahbity blah war prisoner blah blah blah.
The speech was not that bad, and was that the job of the anchors to do? Can you imagine if Brian Williams, Katie Couric or Wolf Biltzer mocked Hillary Clintons speech or Obamas.
I think this was more of a panelist situation, not newscasters. And really I'm just offering up some stuff that was negative towards McCain that MMFA won't mention.
Fair and balanced, that's me :-)
Bruce don't lower yourself to Fox News standards.
John McCains speech was a joke, actually. McCain is unable to speak from the heart, lest the real Mccain comes out.
Matthews has acted like an ass through most of the coverage of Iowa & NH.
The guy isn't even hiding his bias for McCain & Obama...or his hatred of Romney & Clinton.
I've always stuck up for Matthews, but no more. The guy is a joke.
I don't follow Matthews much but when did he drop Mitt?
I remember Chris used to love the cut of his jib and his comfortable chin etc. OK, the chin thing might be someone else.
I sort of lost interest in Chris when he broke up with Rudy and started courting Fred.
I'm so confused. I'm not sure of the time line but I know Chris had had man crushes on a lot of guys before McCain.
He's had more affairs than most soap opera characters.
King,
Trying to keep up with Matthews's man-crushes can be as confusing as a soap opera ;-)
I think once Chris decided Rudy was his tough guy, he not only lost interest in Mitt, he began bad-mouthing the guy almost as badly as he did Hillary. Then when McCain began to show some signs of life, & Rudy ran into to trouble Chris suddenly was all about McCain again. Very fickle ain't he?
This crush on Obama is odd in that Matthews usually only falls hard for Republicans.
Of course some of his being caught up in Obamamania might be because he figures Obama can knock out the hated Hillary.
Could you follow any of that? ;-)
Besides that, Rudy got rid of the pee smell. Remember?
Thanks Bruce. I had forgotten about the pee smell.
That should be Rudy's epitaph, "I cleaned up the pee smell."
Every time he mentions 9/11, I'm going to replace it in my mind with "pee smell".
Btw, I don't think the current Times Square is anything to be proud of. At least pee smell, drugs, and smut have character.
I agree. I drove down 42nd St. yesterday and felt sad.
Yeah GW. Chris declared that W had a sunny nobility or something like that. In other words Chris thought GW was cute and he looked good in his flight suit when he played pilot and declared mission accomplished
Chris also thought GW was "Lincolnesque" and even compared him to Atticus Finch.
And Matthews also fawned over Obama’s speech as definitely being “off the cuff”, comparing it to Hillary having to refer to her notes. Yet just minutes earlier I heard that Obama was reading from a teleprompter.
As for McCain – he better not win the general election because I don’t think I can take another 4 years of a president who makes me embarrassed for my country every time he opens his mouth. It took me 6 years to stop saying to myself, “You are such an idiot” every time I saw GW speak – and I don’t need to go through this again.
Obama so obviously took a Sharpie pen and changed three or four words of his victory speech and gave it last night, I could not believe the fawning revues his speech got. Give me a break. If I hear "they said we couldn't do it, they said we were just dreamers, but we sure fooled them" one more time from any candidate, I swear I'm going to puke. It was especially dumb coming from the guy expected to win easily.
your post reminds me of one of the last great quotes from Hunter Thompson. He was talking about Bush in the first presidential debate in 2004.
"It was pitiful. . . . I almost felt sorry for him, until I heard someone call him "Mister President," and then I felt ashamed."
- Hunter S. Thompson
Not so much fawning over Obama as trashing Hilllary Clinton nonstop, but point well-taken. Between tossing mud at Hillary and applying a halo and wings to McCain all night, Matthews and Olbermann (who I am totally disgusted with today) must be exhausted.
Is MM kidding?
Has any candidate gotten more fawning attention than Barack Obama?
As far as MSNBC supposedly "fawning" over McCain, they really bagged on him for his acceptance speech. MM has simply taken a few moments out of context.
I know, they're practically stroking Obama's ****.
I'm jealous!!! Seriously I hope people won't turn against Obama because he's now too popular. I hope the people that supported him before this will continue to do so. I'd hate to see a back lash over any kind of media silliness.
When did Obama become a conservative again?
No doubt the media are fawning over both of them, and have been for awhile, but please remember, this is a place for conservative mis-information and what not.
this column does not cite any misinformation, it just clips comments of journalists expressing their opinions on mccain. No facts are spoken of.
You need to review what MMFA considers "misinformation". Click on the "About Us" link.
Now that Giuliani is on his way out McCain is now the 'cool candidate'. Nothing surprising here... things are running according to the plan.
When McCain falters down the road it will be... (you fill in the blank).
Flinty is the new black !
Giuliani on his way out? No WAY, didn't you notice, he CREAMED Ron Paul in New Hampshire by almost two percentage points last night!!
Just wait till the race gets to Michigan....err, Florida....err, California...errr.....never mind. I suspect Giuliani will be getting "ready to pounce" as the next President is preparing her Inaugural Address next winter.
Rabbit,
This is another reason why I hate polls. They are so many times wrong and after the real vote the pundits go gaga making new predictions only to be proven wrong again. I think the media influenced the vote. So many independents thought Obama would win, that they decided to vote for McCain.
If I remember correctly, (please correct me if I am wrong,)I heard Russert this morning say Romney has to win in Michigan or it's over for him. In the next sentence he says Edwards can survive not winning in SC.
Russert was saying this about Romney had to win in Iowa.
These pundit prognosticators are wrong more often than the worst student in my wife's Algebra class.
Maybe your wife could explain it to you AA. (insert smiley face here)
Michigan has 83 delegates and South Carolina 29 up for grabs in the Democratic primaries.
Michigan has 45 and South Carolina has 18 in the Republican primaries.
The re-return of Huck?
I thought it was funny whenRachel Maddow told Mathews he tried to affect the votes and Clinton won. Mathews was extolling his polling data and he was convinced Obama was going to win, only to be destroyed by facts. the fat mouth got slapped.
I was just looking at CNN's NH Dem primary results, they show Clinton 39% and Obama 37%. But when you do the numbers it's actually Clinton 39.51% and Obama 36.8%. It's traditional when rounding to take everything .5 and up to the next whole number. They did it for Obama but not for Clinton. I wonder why they didn't show Clinton 40%.
Hey, Romney's ahead in the delegate count right now, how come the media isn't giving him some head too ?? (Pardon my expression, I can't help but make this analogy !)
Maybe they can't get through his magic underwear? -:)