About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly asserted secular progressives think "Mitt Romney is a dangerous Mormon," but polls show conservatives more reluctant to vote for a Mormon

January 09, 2008 7:39 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: Discussing Christian Coalition founder Pat Robertson's 2008 predictions, Bill O'Reilly stated on his Fox News show that the "secular-progressive far left says, look, all these people are crazy; all believers are nuts. They're dangerous people. ... Mitt Romney is a dangerous Mormon." However, polling data indicate that white evangelical Protestants are the most likely to be bothered by Romney's religion, and that conservatives are less willing than liberals to vote for a Mormon.

29 Comments

On the January 4 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, in a discussion with nationally syndicated radio talk-show host Laura Ingraham about Christian Coalition founder Pat Robertson's 2008 predictions, host Bill O'Reilly stated: "[T]he secular-progressive far left says, look, all these people are crazy; all believers are nuts. They're dangerous people. ... Mitt Romney is a dangerous Mormon." However, polling data indicate that white evangelical Protestants are the most likely to be bothered by Romney's religion and that a lower percentage of conservatives than liberals would be willing to vote for a Mormon. Further, Media Matters for America has noted (here, here, and here) several instances of conservative and evangelical leaders' demonstrated hostility toward Mormonism.

A Pew Research Center summary of its August 1-18 survey reported that "GOP Evangelicals [are] reluctant to vote for a Mormon." The Pew survey found: "A quarter of Republican and Republican-leaning voters say they would be less likely to vote for a Mormon. But among white Republican evangelical Protestants, 36% express reservations about voting for a Mormon," compared with 21 percent of "white Catholic Republican voters" and 16 percent of "white non-evangelical Protestant Republicans." Pew's analysis of the poll stated: "[T]he group of Americans most likely to say they value religiosity in a president -- white evangelical Protestants -- is also the group most apt to be bothered by [Romney's] religion. More than one-in-three evangelical Republicans (36%) expressed reservations about voting for a Mormon, a level of opposition much higher than that seen among the electorate overall."

According to a February 9-11, 2007, USA Today/Gallup poll, 75 percent of "liberals" would be willing to vote for a Mormon for president, compared with 66 percent of "conservatives." Gallup's analysis of the poll stated: "Conservatives are less willing than moderates or liberals to vote for candidates with several of the characteristics [of a 'non-traditional candidate'], including being of Mormon faith or married three times. This could make things somewhat more difficult for Romney or [former New York City Mayor Rudy] Giuliani to prevail in the Republican primaries, since conservatives make up the base of the Republican Party."

In addition to polling data, Media Matters has documented other evidence of conservative and evangelical hostility toward Mormonism:

  • In 2004, Mormons were barred from conducting services during National Day of Prayer ceremonies by the group's task force chairwoman, Shirley Dobson, the wife of Focus on the Family founder and chairman James C. Dobson.
  • The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), America's second-largest religious community after Catholicism, has declared Mormonism to be a cult. The SBC's official news service, BP News, highlighted the denomination's rejection of Mormonism in a September 23, 2005, article that began:

For the past 150 years Mormonism has been in conflict with biblical, historic Christianity.

But leaders of Mormonism -- officially known as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints [LDS] -- have in recent years downplayed the cult's divergence from traditional Christianity and now portray it as merely another form of the biblical faith.

The SBC's North American Mission Board -- the SBC's domestic missions agency -- includes the "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons)" on its list of "Major Cults and Sects in North America," and the Mission Board uses LDS as an example in highlighting four of the six characteristics it uses to answer the question, "What is a Cult or Sect?"

Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN) has also identified Mormonism as a cult, listing the religion on a Web page titled "How Do I Recognize a Cult?" The CBN concludes: "[T]he Mormon church is a prosperous, growing organization that has produced many people of exemplary character. But when it comes to spiritual matters, the Mormons are far from the truth."

From the January 4 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

INGRAHAM: He [Pat Robertson] said it was going to be something like nuclear. I don't know what that means. But it was going to be something like nuclear. That didn't happen.

And now he's having the bold prediction of there could be a recession in 2008. And I say that's not a prediction; that's what I read in The New York Times today, OK? If that's a prediction --

O'REILLY: That means it won't happen, though. If you read it in the Times, it won't happen. He also says there will be violence and chaos next year or this year.

INGRAHAM: That's just the Giuliani campaign, Bill. That's just the Giuliani campaign. At this point I think [former Arkansas Gov. Mike] Huckabee and Romney are thrilled that Pat Robertson did not predict that they would win and that he did not endorse them. Because, if I'm Giuliani, I'm thinking, is there any way we can somehow erase this endorsement?

O'REILLY: Now, there's a -- there's a serious undertone to this. Because when a Pat Robertson comes out and makes predictions and says angels are coming and miracles are coming, then the secular-progressive far left says, look, all these people are crazy; all believers are nuts. They're dangerous people. Huckabee's a fanatic, a theocrat; Mitt Romney is a dangerous Mormon. And so it almost feeds into the culture war we have between the believers and the nonbelievers, and that's the serious aspect of it.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Clevenative (January 09, 2008 7:45 pm ET)
         

      You know we’re going to get the argument here that BillO did not lie. He just left out some relevant facts, as usual.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (January 09, 2008 7:52 pm ET)
         

      As opposed to Bill's continuous diatribe that the secular-progressive far left (whoever they are) are crazy, nuts, and dangerous.

      I'm rubber you're glue, everything bounces off me and sticks to you.

      p.s., All religions are cults :) 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (January 10, 2008 2:55 pm ET)
           
        I'm with you. Huckabee, Romney, W., (Roberston, Dobson, etc...)... ALL LOONY'S. And Bill-O? It's not that they believe. It's that they can't stand that someone might believe differently, and refuse to protect everyone's right to believe differently. Religious faith is a matter of opinion, not fact. If you can't get your head around that... YOU'RE A LOONEY! (And dangerous. History is repleat with examples.)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Bootsy (January 09, 2008 7:55 pm ET)
         

      Romeny isn't dangerous because of he's a Mormon, he's dangerous because of his political views.   And because he's trying to blur the line between church and state.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (January 09, 2008 8:07 pm ET)
         

      Point taken. I'm more likely to vote for Mitt than Huckabee is.

      They sound semi sane. At least till the end. How many culture wars can we sustain simultaneously?

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by greekfurnace (January 09, 2008 8:11 pm ET)
         

      This is absolutely correct - it ain't the 'progressives' who have the real problem with Romney... it's the Conservatives.  Romney isn't the right KIND of christian.  Tough for Romney.  But, them's the breaks.

      By the way, so-called 'progressives' don't like Romney for a whole slew of different reasons (most based in reality).  And, let's not forget that tough Romney ALSO cried on a few occasions, here and here. But, that's okay right? Talk about faking sympathy/empathy.  My God.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by copiousdissent.blogspot.com (January 09, 2008 8:17 pm ET)
         

      Yes, because liberals lie to pollsters because they don't want to sound bigoted.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (January 09, 2008 8:30 pm ET)
           

        I don't recall one liberal that I know, or on here that have chastised Romney for being a Mormon. Your guys on the other hand... Well, that's a whole different ball o' wax. We don't like Romney because we don't agree with his policies. As far as Mormons go, I've only personally known a dozen of them or so, and as far as being good, kind, and generous people, every single one of them have been decent and humble human beings.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (January 09, 2008 8:44 pm ET)
             

          I cound not care less that Romney is a Morman. I don't even remember it unless people keep saying it. Even then I forget. But I notice every time someone says something not complimentary about him, some bozo seems to link it to the fact that he's a Morman. Who cares.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by therick (January 09, 2008 8:53 pm ET)
               

            JJ, did you hear?  Romney is a Mormon!!!

            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne (January 09, 2008 9:54 pm ET)
                 

              I had forgotten. Really  ;-0) I'll probably not remember the next time I see him or hear about him though.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by juliajayne (January 09, 2008 9:51 pm ET)
               

            Billous, blowhard, blockhead Billy belabors, bluffs, blunders and bloviates blithely before burdening us with bizarre and brazen blarney. This bird brain binges on the boastful blashphemy of boundless bloodshed.   

            Report Abuse
        • Author by ConstanceRifleII (January 10, 2008 11:19 am ET)
             
          Magnolia, don't give CD the time of day. He never makes a point, just "Liberals are always (insert falsehood Bill O'Reilly made up here)" And CD, if you do read this, prove me wrong and make a coherent point.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mefirst (January 09, 2008 9:10 pm ET)
           

        i defended romney on here after an attack by huckabee on the book of mormon.  i said it's easy to point out nonsense in that book, but huckabee is a hypocrite because the bible contains contradictions also. 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (January 10, 2008 2:21 pm ET)
           
        Let me try and translate COPIUSDISSENT's comment from Rethuglish: "All people are bigots, but at least we Republicans are open and honest about it!" Fortunately, the first part of his statement is patently false.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (January 10, 2008 5:30 pm ET)
           
        You just come here to make a fool out of yourself and show how stupid you are dont you?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Eddy3957 (January 09, 2008 10:32 pm ET)
         

      I think polls on intergroup attitudes if taken at face value are misleading in two respects.  First, unless the political correctness factor of being against some group could be accounted for somehow, I think the findings on an absolute level are grossly inaccurate due to the reluctance of people to be seen as politically incorrect.  

      Second, even if conditions could be controlled for and/or accounted for as far as externalized political correctness---that is the desire to not be seen as biased against a group which society says it’s bad to be against, I still don’t think the numbers will be accurate.  Some people internalize their political correctness and can thereby truthfully say that they are not biased against any given group even when they in fact are.  They rationalize away their bias.  They can truthfully say they would vote for an unspecified individual in that group, but when presented with a real person, they will subconsciously find a reason to vote against him/her because of their group affiliation.  In other words, people can have conflicting beliefs, which prevents them from truly knowing their attitudes towards another group

      Their best use is comparative, that is one group’s attitude as compared to another or over time, and then mainly as a measure of political correctness.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (January 10, 2008 7:42 am ET)
         
      No, Romney is not a "dangerous Mormon". But Bill is a DANGEROUS MORON.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (January 10, 2008 10:43 am ET)
         
      What's really ODD about this presentation is that it's made in the midst of the PRIMARY season. In the PRIMARIES, the candidate's fortunes rise and fall based on what members OF THEIR OWN PARTY think. Of course, the "Culture Warrior" O'Reilly stands ready to bash his invented (and non-specific) boogie-man, the "secular progressive". But guess what, Bill? Whoever this "secular progressive" might be, he will have ZERO influence on the GOP primaries. Put another way, what is important TODAY is an analysis of how the religious factions of the REPUBLICAN RIGHT are sorting things out. How do EVANGELICALS feel about a Mormon candidate? Secular Progressive attitudes (even if you actually knew WHAT they are, even WHO they are), is wholly irrelevant to a primary election discussion. As to the charge itself, O'Reilly is pettifogging the issue. As a Liberal (BO might say Secular Progressive), let's say I have to hire a cop. I wouldn't care whatsoever what RELIGION the cop was, personally. What I care about is that he follow the LAW, and does not attempt to substitute his religious beliefs FOR the law in the carrying-out of his duties. Similarly, a politician who would set aside the Constitution and its clear separation of church and state, and start attempting to LEGISLATE what he believes are the dictates of his personal religion -- that is absolutely unacceptable. It's not about his personal religion, it's about his JOB PERFORMANCE and his willingness to adhere to secular governance in a nation that is set up to honor ALL religions equally, OR NO RELIGION AT ALL if the citizen so chooses. Thus our laws are, and should REMAIN, secular. And our leaders must HONOR this.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (January 10, 2008 2:29 pm ET)
         
      Kind of like the Religious Right thinks Bill O'Reilly is a dangerous sexual predator. Oh, wait, I'm mixed up again... the religious right don't mind that he's a sexual predator, as long as he's a Christian. The right type of Christian. And he's white. So, then, if Bill O. thinks secular progressives are anti-Mormon, then you can deduce from the above that religious righties are pro-sexual predator.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (January 10, 2008 4:26 pm ET)
         
      MMFA, you forgot to put "secular progressives" in quotes (like I just did) ;)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by heru (January 10, 2008 4:44 pm ET)
         
      Excuse me if I shed no tears for Moronism. The Book of Mormon is evil. It claims God cursed people with Black skin. The white racist prophet Brigham Young explained why: "You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind. The first man that committed the odious crime of killing one of his brethren will be cursed the longest of any one of the children of Adam. Cain slew his brother. Cain might have been killed, and that would have put a termination to that line of human beings. This was not to be, and the Lord put a mark upon him, which is the flat nose and black skin. Trace mankind down to after the flood, and then another curse is pronounced upon the same race--that they should be the "servant of servants;" and they will be, until that curse is removed." Brigham Young-President and Prophet of the Mormon Church, Extract from Journal of Discourses.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by heru (January 10, 2008 4:53 pm ET)
         
      Hey Mormons, unlike the Book of Mormon, God is not a white racist. Book of Mormon 2 Nephi 5: 21- 'And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people, the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them.'
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jack6341 (January 11, 2008 4:45 pm ET)
         
      You can boil the whole anti-Mormon statement down to "But when it comes to spiritual matters, the Mormons are far from the truth." The missing part is in their opinion.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dchoughton (January 12, 2008 12:51 pm ET)
         

      I am an active Latter-Day Saint ('Mormon') and a practicing physician with a biology degree from the University of California.  I consider myself a critical thinker.  I am also a student of the scriptures and history.  What people outside the Church (and many inside it) don't understand is that Joseph Smith and subsequent prophets have taught that prophets are still human, and therefore subject to incorrect personal opinions and biases.  Their words are prophetic when they are speaking by the power of God's spirit, but every word that comes out of their mouths is not inspired.  Members of the Church are expected to ponder their words, compare them to canonized scripture, and pray to know whether their words are from God.  The quote from Brigham Young that antagonists like to wave in front of everyone's faces, about a curse being upon blacks, is not canonized, and therefore not binding upon the Church.  The living prophets have collectively stated that any statements from high profile church members of the past portraying blacks as cursed are in error.  Most religious leaders of Brigham Young's day held similar views on race.  Many of the founders of our nation held slaves, which was a gross error, but that does not mean they were evil men.  Today you can go to any LDS congregation anywhere there are black members and see that there is no difference in how blacks are treated.  Gladys Knight converted to the church and sings in the LDS Conference Center, for goodness’ sake!  The LDS Church is not hostile to any racial or ethnic group, and I would hazard to say that the same goes for 99% or more of church members individually.  There are some statements in the Book of Mormon, which when taken out of context, suggest that the book teaches racism , but if a person genuinely examines the book, he/she will discover this is absolutely not true.  The book states, "the Lord...inviteth them all to come unto him and partake of his goodness; and he denieth none that come unto him, black and white, bond and free, male and female; and he remembereth the heathen; and all are alike unto God" (2 Nephi 26:33). Just a few chapters later, Nephi's brother Jacob says this to his fair-skinned people that considered themselves superior to the darker Lamanites: "Behold, the Lamanites your brethren...are more righteous than you...the Lord God will not destroy them, but will be merciful unto them; and one day they shall become a blessed people...wherefore, how much better are you than they, in the sight of your great Creator? ...Wherefore, a commandment I give unto you, which is the word of God, that ye revile no more against them because of the darkness of their skins..." (Jacob 3:5-9). So why do some people conclude that the Book of Mormon preaches racism? Because they have an agenda, and use half-truths to make their point. They are like the small minority of racist Mormons that misinterpret the scriptures to support their bias against people of color, and like people from other faiths that misinterpret their scriptures in an effort to get God on their side, or secular people that take comments from politicians, etc out of context in attempt to prove their point. The reality is that the vast majority of Mormons are loving, generous people that harbor no animosity toward any race.

       

      Report Abuse