About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly criticized as "personal attack" Matthews' assertion that Clinton owes political career to her husband's "mess[ing] around"

January 10, 2008 12:55 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: Bill O'Reilly stated that "some NBC commentators continue to slam Senator Clinton" and aired a video clip of MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews' comment about Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton: "[T]he reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around." O'Reilly called Matthews' comment "rough" and said: "We don't do that here. We would never say that Senator Clinton got her job because her husband messed around. I mean, that is -- that is a personal attack. And it is questionable whether a network should allow that or not."

56 Comments

During the January 9 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly stated that "some NBC commentators continue to slam Senator Clinton" and aired a video clip of MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews' comment following Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-NY) victory in the January 8 New Hampshire Democratic presidential primary, in which Matthews said: "Let's not forget, and I'll be brutal, the reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around. That's how she got to be senator from New York. We keep forgetting it. She didn't win there on her merit." O'Reilly called Matthews' comment "rough" and said: "Now, we should point out that Mr. Matthews has a perfect right to say whatever he wants to say because he is not a reporter. He is a commentator, as I am." O'Reilly added: "But it's rough. I mean, it's rough business what these people over there [at MSNBC] are doing. We don't do that here. We would never say that Senator Clinton got her job because her husband messed around. I mean, that is -- that is a personal attack. And it is questionable whether a network should allow that or not."

Think Progress, Crooks and Liars, Talking Points Memo, Firedoglake, and others also documented Matthews' controversial comments.

From the January 9 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: Now in addition, some NBC commentators continue to slam Senator Clinton.

MATTHEWS [video clip]: Let's not forget, and I'll be brutal, the reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around. That's how she got to be senator from New York. We keep forgetting it. She didn't win there on her merit.

O'REILLY: Rough. Joining us now from Washington with analysis, Michelle Bernard, who has been observing election coverage as president of the Independent Women's Forum. You know, NBC, a very powerful network. We have said for years that this network is not fair and has an agenda a mile long. And now I think their own people are admitting it. And what do you think?

BERNARD: Well, you know, Bill, I guess one of the ways to look at this is welcome to the era of advocacy journalism. I mean for better or for worse, it unfortunately appears that a large segment of the American population is now willing to accept this type of journalism. I mean, one of the things I was thinking after I heard this reporter from NBC News' comments was, well, maybe, maybe, you know, the silver lining in this is that he is admitting to biased journalism.

O'REILLY: Well, that's what Williams says. That's what Williams says, but I have to tell you when I worked in the network 20 years ago, he would have been removed on the spot if he had said something like that. I worked at ABC and CBS. Both networks when I was there would have removed him because you can't have that kind of a rooting interest. Yes, his candor. I don't know, you can say it's refreshing or it's honest, whatever. Now, we should point out that Mr. Matthews has a perfect right to say whatever he wants to say because he is not a reporter. He is a commentator, as I am. But it's rough. I mean, it's rough business what these people over there are doing. We don't do that here. We would never say that Senator Clinton got her job because her husband messed around. I mean, that is -- that is a personal attack. And it is questionable whether a network should allow that or not.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (January 10, 2008 1:03 pm ET)
         
      O'Reilly hates NBC, aka MSNBC. Matthews and O'Reilly dislike Clinton. O'Reilly uses this as a way to appear he is fair and balanced, while sticking it to NBC, aka MSNBC........one needs a scorecard to keep all these mind-numbing cable news hosts' spats straight. Why don't they just take it out back?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (January 10, 2008 1:08 pm ET)
           
        I'm looking at this whole thing as the right wingers who dominate talk radio, and TV shows such as O'Reilly's, are starting to "eat their own". It's actually starting to get quite comical and all.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (January 10, 2008 1:13 pm ET)
           
        I don't care why O'Reilly picked it, the fact is that Matthews said Clinton's political standing is the result of a sex act. It's as off base an assertion as it is a personal attack, and Matthews should be slammed for his absurdity.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by conleytgwinn (January 10, 2008 3:08 pm ET)
             
          I must agree: I don't care if the author of the rebuke IS O'LIElly - the rebuke is deserved, and the rationale is valid. Of course, now that I have established that I don't hate O'LIElly, I need to stick in the question: since when did O'LIElly abandon personal attacks?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (January 11, 2008 9:20 am ET)
           
        "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." O'Reilly loathes and detests Hillary, but will come to her rescue on THIS instance, because he loathes and detests MSNBC and its commentators MORE. In so doing, O'Reilly has forged an AGREEMENT with MMFA, that Matthews engaged in misinformation. O'Reilly and MMFA, ALLIES in AGREEMENT? O'Reilly will have to scrub himself with a loofa for hours.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 10, 2008 1:15 pm ET)
         
      Matthews' is no right-winger. Have you seen the way he's been groveling over Obama? He's an idiot for sure, but his obeisance to the liberal Obama is readily apparent.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (January 10, 2008 5:27 pm ET)
           
        Matthews may say nice things about Obama as a foil to Clinton, whom Matthews clearly loathes. But there's NO QUESTION that Matthews has positively gushed and fawned over McCain, Romney, Giuliani and Fred Thompson.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 10, 2008 5:31 pm ET)
             
          We definitelty differ in opinion here, and think you have it the other way around. He may say nice things about the republicans, but, at least lately, he's been gushing over Obama like he has a teenage crush.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mefirst (January 11, 2008 10:07 am ET)
               
            for instance?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by wasademocrat73 (January 11, 2008 4:51 pm ET)
               
            I have to agree with you. Several times, I heard Matthews refer to Obama as a "dreamer" and Clinton as "establishment," and then saying that the establishment almost always beats the dreamer. He then said that he wished it wasn't so. Matthews has also played Obama speeches and would say, "wow," or something like that afterwards.

            I don't think he cares for Clinton or Huckabee, for that matter. He snarls whenever he's on or mentioned. It's not Republicans across the board.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (January 11, 2008 6:37 pm ET)
           
        No I agree he is no more a rightwinger than he is a left winger. He is mostly an idiot.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jim359 (January 10, 2008 1:22 pm ET)
         
      Pot, meet Kettle.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (January 10, 2008 1:46 pm ET)
           
        We don't do that here. hahahahahahahaheeheeehehehehahahahaaaahohohohohohohooooo!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (January 10, 2008 1:29 pm ET)
         
      Apparently Fox has decided to hate MSNBC more than Hillary.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (January 10, 2008 1:36 pm ET)
           
        LOL. I think O'Reilly feels MSNBC is a bigger threat to him in some way than Hillary is, he is nothing if not predictable.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (January 10, 2008 1:44 pm ET)
             
          I blame Olbermann. O'Reilly is projecting.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (January 10, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
               
            But will Keith name Matthews WPITW?? Hehehe...sorry I couldn't resist ;-)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dbeden4153 (January 10, 2008 3:06 pm ET)
                 
              your name should be Sue2 ;)
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (January 10, 2008 3:32 pm ET)
                   
                Aw be nice ;-) Just think of me as Sue's tag team partner when it comes to St. Keith.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Sueelldd (January 10, 2008 9:47 pm ET)
                   
                Thats nice, i never said anything and I am being mentioned. Thanks
                Report Abuse
            • Author by DorisRussell (January 10, 2008 3:21 pm ET)
                 
              Jeter No, I think we all realize that Keith Olbermann will never be critical of anyone at NBC News. The question I have is will he go after O'Reilly now for saying this?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jeter2 (January 10, 2008 3:31 pm ET)
                   
                Doris, I doubt Olbermann touches this [though he'll be tempted to] only because it would mean having to expose his MSNBC colleague Matthews as being a jerk. Can't have that!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Governor (January 10, 2008 3:56 pm ET)
                     
                  I'm as cynical as the next misinform-fatigued person, but I gotta say, this Olbermann invoking syndrome struck by some on here is quite baffling.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (January 10, 2008 10:26 pm ET)
                       
                    but I gotta say, this Olbermann invoking syndrome struck by some on here is quite baffling. LOL, Yeah it truly is funny how Keith's name comes into all subjects. I think it has something to do with a missed prom date.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by DorisRussell (January 11, 2008 6:45 am ET)
                       
                    Gov, I do not think it is "invoking". Snoopy and Jeter brought it up first and the fact is Chris Matthews consistently says things about Hillary Clinton that are sexist. If Chris Matthews were on FOX or CNN he would be mentioned by Olbermann. It is not a bad thing to hope that Olbermann would take him on.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by MHK (January 11, 2008 9:40 am ET)
                         
                      Have any of you ever corrisponded with Keith to ask him why he never goes after CM? I agree he should comment on CM', but it's likely that the network will not allow it. Comment on CM or lose my job? I know which one I would pick.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by DorisRussell (January 11, 2008 10:35 am ET)
                           
                        Yes I have, I have also emailed MSNBC to take Matthews off the air for his sexist comments.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by MHK (January 11, 2008 11:47 am ET)
                             
                          Any reply to your concern on KO not commenting about CM? Just curious! Thanks for your reply Doris
                          Report Abuse
    • Author by neondesert (January 10, 2008 1:38 pm ET)
         
      Just stop with the retaliation, Billdo. Accept the fact that Chris Matthews does not swoon over your manly scent. Instead of lashing out at him in retaliation, get over it and find someone else. Oh, and Billdo: Chris apparently finds these machismo-demonstrative scraps with body guards about as alluring as Andrea found your falafel. Knock off that crap, too. Leave the secret service to do their jobs instead of babysitting petulant ex-paparazzi.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (January 10, 2008 1:55 pm ET)
           
        It is my belief that Bill did not go to Obama's event to find a story, he went there to make himself the story.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (January 10, 2008 1:53 pm ET)
         
      "We don't do that here. We would never say that Senator Clinton got her job because her husband messed around." I'm curious to know what he means by "we" and "here". Does he mean Fox News as a whole? Or just he and his merry band of chimpanzees who do the research for his nightly train wreck? Other Fox shows have certainly stooped as low or lower than Matthews.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (January 10, 2008 2:10 pm ET)
           
        Yeah, how could this guy keep a straight face while saying this one? jim359's (4th) post says it all in 3 words.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by atheist (January 10, 2008 2:43 pm ET)
         
      His hypocrisy aside, I have to commend O'Loofah for making that statement !
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dbeden4153 (January 10, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
         
      I guess it's a "do as I say, not as I do" kinda moment. Hmm, me thinks that should be the GOP's montra.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 10, 2008 2:52 pm ET)
           
        I don't know, if BO had directed similar sexist comments towards HC in the past, MM most definitely would've cited them here.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dbeden4153 (January 10, 2008 3:04 pm ET)
             
          I was thinking in terms of a baseless assertion type of deal than directly being sexist towards Hillary
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (January 10, 2008 3:32 pm ET)
               
            This is interesting. MMFA is citing BilldO for pointing out right wing misinformation. I was expecting the item to be about past "personal attacks" of O'Reilly's, to focus on his hypocrisy. I guess since BilldO isn't a journalist, by his own admission, he's set a lower standard for himself. Off topic, but O'Reilly had a segment on last night based on a comment by an NBC reporter (Not while reporting, it was filmed as a behind-the-scenes candid moment) where the reporter, in discussing the enthusiasm of Obama's campaign, and his appeal, stated that it was hard to be objective. What I saw was a journalist who was aware of his own susceptibility to emotion, commenting that he was aware of the possibility of being biased. I think that awareness would be critical to being objective, but that's not how BilldO saw it. It was clearly an admission of left-wing media bias. Never mind that the reporter was commenting on a Dem who is currently competing with other Dems, and was saying clearly that he could see the possibility of personal preferences influencing his reporting, BilldO was amazed at this "confession". Imagine if Bill or any of his Fox co-horts were ever objective enough to realize how hard it is to be objective.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by JLyons (January 10, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
             
          I agree, I have never read about BO saying something as bad as this. MSNBC should be ashamed but that is why they are a 3rd rate network.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by williebtoo4638 (January 10, 2008 2:58 pm ET)
         
      I can only only hope Bill doesn't hurt himself when he trips iver his nose.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DorisRussell (January 10, 2008 3:20 pm ET)
         
      I am proud of O'Reilly for saying this, I give him credit.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (January 10, 2008 4:53 pm ET)
         
      When former GOP speechwriter/attack dog Pat Buchanan and Fox News talking head O'Reilly point out how bad things have gotten for HRC you know things are bad.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Blue Dog (January 10, 2008 5:31 pm ET)
         
      I just don't trust billo. I'm thinking that he WANTS hrc to be the nominee, because nothing would motivate the right to get to the polls as much as clinton. The republicans are going to have a turnout problem if obama or edwards is the nominee, because no republican is ever going to switch over and vote for a democrat because the republican nominee isn't good enough....they just won't vote. But vs a CLINTON? the right will vote for bin laden before they let clinton win.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by atheist (January 10, 2008 5:37 pm ET)
         
      Look at the following quotes, and then someone tell me why Clinton's remarks are considered offensive or, as Tommy puts it, "whining", and yet Obama's remarks are not considered offensive or "whining". Clinton at Wellesley: "In so many ways, this all women's college prepared me to compete on the all boys' club of presidential politics [...] We need to shatter that highest glass ceiling" Obama at the Union Missionary Baptist church in Waterloo Iowa: "Some folks still have barriers before them, barriers of discrimination, lack of education, families that have disintegrated because this country has systematically devalued the black family," Why is it OK for Obama to acknowledge racism-induced inequalities but it's not OK for Clinton to acknowledge sexism-induced inequalities.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kgonz (January 10, 2008 6:40 pm ET)
         
      Now THIS is irony. For anyone who didn't get the exact notion of irony (some long-ago thread), this is it. Bill castigates someone for doing EXACTLY what he does, and displays absolutely no awareness of his hypocrisy. If it were a drama, this would be the PERFECT example of dramatic irony, in which a character says something which the audience recognizes as ironic, but which the speaker cannot/does not. Wow. Every once in a while, Bill outdoes himself. It's difficult, but he succeeds here.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sams Politics (January 10, 2008 7:09 pm ET)
         
      Fuzzy Calculus... Is what Conservative pundits are about. Except for loose cannon O'Reilly, because he's just for himself. WHAT IF... all this Hostile, Hurtful Hillary Hating is Political Calculus to help her win the nomination. A vast Republican conspiracy to attack her so much that it causes voters to respond by nominating Hillary? Hillary will then wake up the Republican base and get them excited enough to get out and vote. They aren't exited enough about the Republican candidates.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HotWings (January 10, 2008 7:43 pm ET)
         
      Wait a minute. Media Matters is going after Chris Matthews for the exact same thing. Why is it okay for Media Matters to do it but not okay for Bill O'Reilly to do it?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (January 11, 2008 8:58 am ET)
           
        The point of the story is that O’Reilly, nor anyone at Fox, has room to scorn anyone else for personal attacks – and insist that “We don't do that here”. You don’t see that as hypocrisy and “conservative misinformation”?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dangrady (January 10, 2008 8:05 pm ET)
         
      SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!! Matthews has had it in for the Clinton's, and it's no secret. He resents the Democratic admiration for Clinton, and thinks his Tip O'Neil and LBJ should be what is remembered as real Democrats. He may be right, yet his standards as a commentator has made him an advocate long ago, thus unreliable. Mr. Matthews is so full of himself that he has no problem telling the whole State of New York's voters too stupid to know when a Senator is worth RE-ELECTING TO A SECOND 6YR TERM! Happy Thoughts; Dan Grady
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Etan (January 10, 2008 10:23 pm ET)
         
      Ummm...and was Bill actually implying he was a journalist?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Don Quixote (January 10, 2008 11:53 pm ET)
         
      Very clever Billy boy. Kill two birds with one stone: Say the unsayable about Hillary (who you hate), by repeating Mathews' vile comment and then saying that you wouldn't say that (even though in effect, you did say it... twice). Then act all self righteous and condemn MSNBC (who you also hate) for saying the unsayable (which, again, you repeated and in effect said it). Brilliant!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sams Politics (January 11, 2008 5:06 am ET)
         
      Fuzzy Calculus... Is what Conservative pundits are about. Except for loose cannon O'Reilly, because he's just for himself and must have failed in Math. WHAT IF... all this Hostile, Hurtful Hillary Hating is Political Calculus to help her win the nomination. A vast Republican conspiracy to attack her so much that it causes voters to respond by nominating Hillary? Hillary will then wake up the Republican base and get them excited enough to get out and vote. They aren't exited enough about their current options for Republican candidates.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bpaulg6113 (January 11, 2008 10:50 am ET)
         
      I use to hate Fox News, but during this campaign, they have been the most fair to Hillary and Obama. The night of the NH primary, I couldn't watch MSNBC or CNN, because they were celebrating the demise of Hillary. Fox never gave that kind of commentary, they just reported the results as they were comming in. I don't need Chris Mathews or Wolf Blitzer telling me why Clinton will lose and by how much, even though the results were in her favor. They didn't even want to believe that she had won. When the AP declared her the winner, they were still skeptical. I loved watching Chris Mathews eat his words. He was so upset that she won. I never thought I would be defending Fox, but they are not telling people who to vote for, they are just reporting the news on each candidate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wvhart6757 (January 11, 2008 11:24 pm ET)
         
            Matthews gets hammered by both sides. What does that tell you? It tells me he's doing his job. And for the record (this to  Mr. O'Reilly), Matthews has been staunch critic of the Clintons for years. He didn't need an Obama candidacy to reveal it. Seriously, though, everybody's got an unterior motive....except for Fox. THIS is what we are led to believe. paranoiacstoogetalk.blogspot.com  for more.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.