CNN's Borger: Clinton is "a robo-candidate" who "suddenly ... show[ed] some humanity"
On the January 9 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, while discussing whether Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-NY) emotional remarks during a January 6 campaign event contributed to her victory in the New Hampshire Democratic primary, senior political analyst Gloria Borger called Clinton a "robo-candidate" who "suddenly ... show[ed] some humanity."
From the discussion on the January 9 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, featuring Borger, host Wolf Blitzer, commentator Jack Cafferty, and legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin:
BLITZER: Here's the most intriguing comment that Hillary Clinton made in her victory speech, I thought, last night.
CLINTON [video clip]: I want especially to thank New Hampshire. Over the last week, I listened to you, and in the process, I found my own voice.
BLITZER: What do you think, Jack?
CAFFERTY: I think that's one of the better lines of the entire campaign. I'm not sure exactly --
TOOBIN: Can you say what it means?
CAFFERTY: I was going to say, I'm not sure exactly -- I'm not sure I know what it means.
BORGER: It sounds good.
TOOBIN: It does sound good.
CAFFERTY: Boy, is it a great line. No, it's a good line. It's a little bit of that humanity thing again that we don't see a lot of out of Hillary and that we saw in the diner on Monday and that I will go to my grave convinced is what drove her to the victory last night.
BORGER: All I can say, Jack, is, whoever thought that tearing up would be a really good career move for a woman.
TOOBIN: For a woman.
BORGER: Never. I never thought so. But when you have a robo-candidate and suddenly she shows some humanity -- and there are those people who believe it wasn't real, but I actually do believe it was real -- it actually helped her.
TOOBIN: And there is a sort of wonderful historical circle with -- you know, in the same state where Ed Muskie's career went up in flames because he cried, perhaps Hillary Clinton is being politically resurrected because she misted up. I mean, I still am a little skeptical about this whole misting up -- the significance of it. But apparently -- I mean, the people in her campaign seem to think it's important. Jack Cafferty thinks it's important, so it must be important.















What I'm getting at is that the "boys meanie club" accusations would have never happened if they weren't true. E. Dole didn't get the attacks because Dems generally don't play that game, for sure not 18 months before the elction, like has happened with Hillary.