About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Gibson on Matthews' "mind-blowing" comment: "[Y]ou listen to this and you tell me who the sexist is"

January 14, 2008 4:30 pm ET
image

Please upgrade your flash player. The audio for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a MP3 version of the audio.

SUMMARY: On his January 10 Fox News Radio show, John Gibson aired a clip of MSNBC host Chris Matthews' recent comments about Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, which he described as "mind-blowing," and said, "[T]hose women out here who called me a sexist last night, you listen to this and you tell me who the sexist is."

34 Comments

On the January 10 broadcast of his nationally syndicated Fox News Radio show, John Gibson aired a clip of recent remarks by MSNBC's Chris Matthews concerning Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) that "the reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around." Before airing the clip, Gibson declared Matthews' comments "mind-blowing" and added, "[T]hose women out here who called me a sexist last night, you listen to this and you tell me who the sexist is."

During the January 9 broadcast of his radio show, Gibson characterized Clinton's manner of speaking as a "screech" and said that "in a great bit of Clinton jujitsu, she used the Oprah Winfrey rule," which he described as: "You know, speak softly. Be vulnerable ... Shed a tear to beat the guy who had Oprah on his side. Wasn't that fabulous?" Later during the January 9 show, a caller complained that Gibson's comments were "extremely sexist." Gibson asked if the caller was voting for Clinton, and an associate producer, identified only as "Christine" on the show, said the caller had hung up. Gibson replied: "Now, isn't that just like a woman? ... That is the equivalent of walking out of the room and slamming the door."

Gibson on January 10 also referred to the purported "Oprah-fication of the presidential race" after reading from an article in the Houston Chronicle that claimed that "[w]omen who've spent years in Texas politics said yes, they believe Hillary Clinton when she came perilously close to shedding a tear on the campaign trail earlier this week."

From the January 9 broadcast of Fox News Radio's The John Gibson Show:

GIBSON: Did Hillary really win because she was emotional --

CLINTON [audio clip]: It's not easy.

GIBSON: And vulnerable.

CLINTON [audio clip]: It's not easy. And I couldn't do it if I didn't just, you know, passionately believe it was the right thing to do.

GIBSON: And teary. Here it comes.

CLINTON [audio clip]: You know, I have so many opportunities from this country.

GIBSON: So many.

CLINTON [audio clip]: I just don't want to see us fall backwards.

GIBSON: [feigning crying] Oh, me either. Me either.

GIBSON: Maybe Hillary just discovered she has a voice other than that screech we normally hear. Maybe it was nice to hear Hillary speaking softly. And maybe women related to that.

CLINTON [audio clip]: I come tonight with a very, very full heart. And I want especially to thank New Hampshire over the last week. I listened to you and in the process I found my own voice.

GIBSON: Well, I think there's a falsehood buried in that. "Over the last week, I listened to you." No, no, she listened to herself. She listened to all those tapes of her screeching.

CLINTON [audio clip]: That was to equip us to do what needed to be done in reforming Social Security the right way. Reforming Medicare and Medicaid the right way.

GIBSON: Ow.

CLINTON [audio clip]: Making investments --

GIBSON: Ow.

CLINTON [audio clip]: -- in clean, alternative energy. Dealing with global climate change.

GIBSON: Ow-w-w.

CLINTON [audio clip]: Making health care available and affordable to --

GIBSON: Ow!

CLINTON [audio clip]: -- every single American!

GIBSON: That hurt!

CLINTON [audio clip]: That's what that was for!

GIBSON: Ouch! I need health care now. My eardrums!

ANGRY RICH (executive producer): I need to blow my brains out.

GIBSON: So, somebody said to her, "Hillary, speak softly."

CLINTON [audio clip]: I felt like we all spoke from our hearts and I'm so gratified that you responded. Now together, let's give America the kind of comeback that New Hampshire has just given me.

GIBSON: She learned something there. I mean, you know, she just was not as screechy. And of course, what's the ultimate irony of this is that people are going around saying Oprah Winfrey's going to win this for Barack Obama. And in a great bit of Clinton jujitsu, she used the Oprah Winfrey rule.

AUDIO CLIP: Hi, Oprah.

GIBSON: You know, speak softly. Be vulnerable.

ANGRY RICH: Cry.

GIBSON: Shed a tear to beat the guy who had Oprah on his side. Wasn't that fabulous?

[...]

GIBSON: The tears of a clown, baby. Was it the tears that did it? Kim in Michigan, what do you think?

CALLER: You know, I think what you said is just extremely sexist.

GIBSON: Why?

CALLER: You know, I drove all the way up from work and I'm listening to this about Hillary and the interview --

GIBSON: Yeah?

CALLER: -- and this or that about cleaning the closets out. And, you know, if it was George W. exercising or jogging, or on a fishing trip, or Dick Cheney hunting, that's OK to be talked about, but when you ask a woman what she would rather do or she does for a hobby, it's all of a sudden feminine.

GIBSON: Do you believe it? Do you believe she cleans her closets?

CALLER: You know, why not? Who cares? It could be a way she deals with stress.

[crosstalk]

GIBSON: And by the way, Kim, how am I being sexist? She went on that show, and she said these things. She wanted to get to you and say these things.

CALLER: But you know what? I don't vote Democratic. I'm Republican and I wouldn't vote for her because of her politics anyway.

GIBSON: Well, but, I mean, you know your friends will, right?

CALLER: But you know what? It's the way you did it, just to kind of get our reaction. That's just the whole way society thinks --

[crosstalk]

GIBSON: Is there or is there not, Kim, an Oprah effect in this society.

CALLER: You know what? I don't pay attention to it, to be honest with you. I'm too busy working to sit home and watch all that garbage.

[crosstalk]

GIBSON: Well, you think you're most women, or you think that you're in the minority?

CALLER: You know, I think I'm the majority. Women are out there working nowadays.

GIBSON: Then why does she have a billion dollars a year from a show aimed at women?

CALLER: You know, because -- I guess, I don't know. I can't explain that.

GIBSON: Well, but that's my point, Kim, is you may be one of those women that I hear talk show hosts talking about now that don't fit in what I'm talking about. They're out there working, they're not paying attention to this. My wife has never seen an Oprah show. Ever.

But I'm telling you, they're there. And you know who they are, and you know as well as I do that this was, this was a moment that a lot of women bonded with.

CALLER: You know, I don't think so. I think people are just out there, and they're following her 'cause of her politics. And I really like the way you say "one of those women." You know? I don't know, I --

GIBSON: All right. Well, let me put it this way, Kim: Have you ever seen the Oprah show?

CALLER: Yeah. When I'm away on vacation.

GIBSON: What do you see in the audience?

CALLER: Women. Of course.

GIBSON: One of those women. Those are the women I'm talking about.

CALLER: Oh yeah, and there's not a man out there that doesn't watch Oprah, right?

ANGRY RICH: There's not a real man.

GIBSON: Yeah, right.

CALLER: Come on, there's a lot of men out there that watch Oprah.

CHRISTINE: There are men out there that watch that show. They're in the audience, too. I see them.

GIBSON: Oh, I know what kind of men those are.

AUDIO CLIP: Gorgeous.

ANGRY RICH: -- from San Francisco.

CALLER: Yeah, there you go. There are 200 women in the audience, out of all the people that watch it, no man ever watches it. Come on, guys. Now you're just being silly.

GIBSON: Well, listen -- no I'm not being silly. That show is aimed at women, Kim. You are in denial if you think it's not. You are in denial if you think that Oprah is a billionaire because she appeals to men.

CALLER: You just insinuated that if you're a man that in some way, shape, or form, you're one of those men that watch Oprah.

GIBSON: I did.

CALLER: Yeah.

GIBSON: I know -- we know who we're talking about here.

CALLER: Oh yeah, you sure do.

GIBSON: Well, you know --

CALLER: You can't reason with people like you. And that's exactly the reason why the country's in the state it's in.

ANGRY RICH: It's your fault, John.

GIBSON: Are you voting for Hillary?

CHRISTINE: She hung up.

GIBSON: She hung up.

ANGRY RICH: She's in denial, John.

GIBSON: Now, isn't that just like a woman?

CHRISTINE: You're really digging yourself into a hole.

GIBSON: That made her mad.

CHRISTINE: You made her mad.

GIBSON: That made her mad. Kim hung up on me because she didn't want to discuss it anymore. That is the equivalent of walking out of the room and slamming the door.

CHRISTINE: There's nothing wrong with what she said. She was right on. She made her point and she didn't feel like talking to you anymore.

From the January 10 broadcast of The John Gibson Show:

GIBSON: Meantime, Hillary said today in this quote, "Maybe I have liberated us to actually let women be human beings in public." As Mary Matalin said today on my television show, her new campaign theme is "Four more tears! Four more tears!" What, Christine?

CHRISTINE: It's clever.

GIBSON: It is good, isn't it? Hillary expands on her Oprah-fication project, fully embracing it: "Maybe I have liberated us to actually let women be human beings in public."

AUDIO CLIP: Hi, Oprah.

GIBSON: She is woman. You will not hear her roar. She will instead speak softly and shed just the teeniest of tears.

There are some of those who haven't got the memo. I mean, I actually thought this was unbelievable and I think so many things that Monkey Man says are unbelievable. But for Chris Matthews to say the following was just mind-blowing. You -- those women out here who called me a sexist last night, you listen to this and you tell me who the sexist is.

MATTHEWS [audio clip]: I think the Hillary appeal has always been somewhat about her mix of toughness and sympathy for her. Let's not forget -- and I'll be brutal -- the reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around. That's how she got to be senator from New York. We keep forgetting it.

She didn't win there on her merit. She won because everybody felt, "My God, this woman stood up under humiliation," right? That's what happened. That's how it happened. In 1998 she went to New York and campaigned for Chuck Schumer as almost like the grieving widow of absurdity, and she did it so well and courageously --

GIBSON: Ow.

MATTHEWS [audio clip]: -- but it was about the humiliation of Bill Clinton.

GIBSON: Geez, that hurts. Man. Can you -- I know people ignore him because he says so many idiotic things.

AUDIO CLIP: Ha!

GIBSON: But just supposing I had said something like that last night, that she really was voted into office in the U.S. Senate and is going to win the presidency because her husband fooled around on her.

BILL CLINTON [audio clip]: It's all my fault.

GIBSON: I mean, confirming all of this is, here's a Houston Chronicle. Now, this is well, well out of the way of the Washington-New York-L.A. political treadmill. This is Houston. And two female reporters writing for the Houston Chronicle, Jeanine [sic: Jeannie] Kever and Claudia Feldman, are doing this story about the tears. And they say, "Women who've spent years in Texas politics say the tears were for real. They believe Hillary Clinton when she came perilously close to actually shedding a tear. 'I saw the tears. I connected, and I'm sure a lot of women did,' said Sylvia Garcia, a Harris County commissioner who supported [New Mexico Gov.] Bill Richardson. 'At that moment, she wasn't a candidate being handled, she wasn't following her talking points. She was just herself, excited and passionate.' " Once again, the Oprah-fication of the presidential race.

"Lyn Ragsdale, dean of Rice University's School of Social Sciences, predicted Clinton will steadily gain support from women as the campaign moves to bigger states.

"But even among women who are backing other candidates, Clinton's display of emotion resonated.

" 'I guess I've spent my whole adult life trying to get women in public office, including me,' Ragsdale [sic: Sissy Farenthold, "a former state legislator and two-time candidate for Texas governor"] said. 'The tears, I guess I can't help but relate and think of my own experiences.' "

I said it last night, and you were so mad at me, but:

AUDIO CLIP: Gibson was right. Again.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by JLyons (January 14, 2008 4:36 pm ET)
         
      I do not know if I am supposed to be impressed? Gibson thinks Matthews is sexist? Fine that is like Charles Manson saying that the Son of Sam is a murderer. Not sure of Gibsons point. he is in the gutter as much as Matthews.  Disgusting
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (January 14, 2008 5:10 pm ET)
           
        Guess this proves the old saying: "It takes one to know one".

        :-)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wolfbato (January 14, 2008 7:42 pm ET)
           
        I urge everybody to take Matthews off your DVR/TIVO and let MSNBC know you are doing this. Hurt him where it hurts ... his ratings. Let's get rid of this Fascist ... once and for all.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by greekfurnace (January 14, 2008 4:42 pm ET)
         

      Dear John - it's not who's MOST sexist... it's just sexism/male chauvinism in general. Both of you idiots apply.

      Gibson is such a boob. Loudmouthed toughguy with peroxide-blond hair. He should keep his fat yapper closed. But, that's just me.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ufleirx (January 14, 2008 8:23 pm ET)
           
        Loudmouthed toughguy with peroxide-blond hair.

        Wait I am lost are we talking about Gibson or Rick Flair? Cause seldom do the terms toughgu and peroxide blond appear in the same sentence describing the same person.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by greekfurnace (January 15, 2008 10:30 am ET)
             
          I would pay-per-view for a Flair-Gibson cage match. Now, that's good TV!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by deeznuts (January 14, 2008 4:42 pm ET)
         

      As though it's impossible for both Gibson and Matthews to be sexist.

      Guess what John? You're equally worthless!

      PS: I have a conservative (wingnut) acquaintance who still insists Chris Matthews is a flaming liberal because he worked for Carter 30 years ago.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (January 14, 2008 5:11 pm ET)
           
        And Mark Levin keeps claiming that Mike Huckabee (of all people) is a liberal...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by sportsguydave (January 15, 2008 2:01 am ET)
             
          Right, WZ.

          Levin's butt-buddy Sean Hannity thinks the same thing.

          BTW, you should have heard Hannity gushing today about how he and the Great One were IMing each other while Levin watched football on Sunday. Priceless!! :)
          Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (January 14, 2008 7:30 pm ET)
           
        That is just what I was thinking who knew there could only be one?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by anotheramerican (January 14, 2008 4:48 pm ET)
         

      MMFA should add "Attack Chris Matthews anyway we can" to it's Mission Statement?  It sure seems that way lately.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by DorisRussell (January 14, 2008 4:56 pm ET)
           
        AA, I like you but you are being a little silly with that statement, no? ;-)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (January 14, 2008 5:07 pm ET)
           
        And really, is it "attacking" him when you reprint his actual statements? That sounds like what O'Reilly insists.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (January 14, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
           
        To quote him is to attack him? You're starting to sound like Bill O'Reilly.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (January 14, 2008 5:19 pm ET)
             
          Sorry Mick, I didn't mean to be redundant and I should have read the replies. I'll go sit in the corner now.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by MickD (January 14, 2008 6:10 pm ET)
               
            Great minds think alike. It was funny to see it written differently, but the same statement. Sorta like a posting thesaurus. Anyway, AA probably needed to hear it twice.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dbeden4153 (January 14, 2008 10:34 pm ET)
                 
              So to put out his full-fledged quotes in their exact context is an attack? Smells of BillO to me.

              Just thought I'd throw in my own interpretation.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by tman418 (January 14, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
           
        Maybe Chris Matthews should change the name of his show to "Attack Hillary Clinton any way I can."

        This wasn't exactly an "attack" on Matthews but more in John Gibson for trying to point to someone else as proof that he is not sexist.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (January 14, 2008 5:54 pm ET)
             
          Maybe Chris Matthews should change the name of his show to "Attack Hillary Clinton any way I can."

          Or just change it from "Hardball" to "Dogpile".
          Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (January 14, 2008 6:05 pm ET)
           
        Two parts:

        1) AA,

        Unless I am missing your tongue in cheek reference, how exactly has MMFA attacked Matthews lately?

        To all posters, how unintentionally funny is Gibson? This would be like Dan Quayle calling out Bush for being in the National Guard ;).
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (January 15, 2008 12:06 pm ET)
           
        Like the dictionary attacks words.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (January 14, 2008 5:14 pm ET)
         
      AnotherAmerican, I wholeheartedly agree with your statement...Let's Attack Matthews anyway we can....just as he has attacked Sen. Clinton. This is where I am lost...Why exactly does he continually attack her?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (January 14, 2008 5:29 pm ET)
           
        I think he "attacks" her because he does not like her, for whatever reasons that he has or has not stated. I guess he is entitled to it, as are you, as am I.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by friedbergboy1422 (January 14, 2008 7:39 pm ET)
             
          Hi Tommy,

          I agree he is entitled to his bizarre opinions, but would you agree with me that he is spouting them in the wrong forum? I don't watch Hardball all that much, but doesn't he have more of a journalist role than a pundit role on the show?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by steeve (January 14, 2008 10:37 pm ET)
             
          *sigh* Matthews is not entitled to it, because he has a national platform and is supposed to be at least a little bit professional and competent.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (January 15, 2008 12:35 am ET)
             
          Another First Amendment refresher courtesy of Tommy.

          I'll try to be as clear as I can, but do try to keep up.

          Yes, we know, Matthews is entitled to his opinion on everything . The Constitution does not, however, entitle him to a wide-reaching forum in which to attack. That entitlement is granted by his employer.

          And so...eureka! We've stumbled upon what's wrong with our media and the reason MMFA exists: media heads who are willing to entitle people like Matthews.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by unhipcat (January 14, 2008 5:51 pm ET)
         

      doofus: "tweety is sexister than I am."

      my head hurts.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (January 14, 2008 8:24 pm ET)
         
      Christ, I read the headline as Gibson asking "Tell me who the SEXIEST is."

      Don't try to tell me this election cycle hasn't been too long already.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ufleirx (January 14, 2008 8:53 pm ET)
           
        "Tell me who the SEXIEST is."

        There is a wet tee-shirt contest I want nothing to do with. Things that make you go ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!

        My mind is not allowing me to maintain that thought. Thank God for the evolutionary survival mechanism of represeed memory. I love oxymorons.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by 7YearsLeft (January 14, 2008 11:40 pm ET)
         
      Is this no talent hack still on? A mime is more entertaining than this knob!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (January 15, 2008 12:42 am ET)
         

      Hmm... 

      I wonder where and how Gibson got word about what Matthews said.

      Hmm...

      The name of the site is on the tip of my tongue. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hcl40u9687 (January 15, 2008 7:32 pm ET)
         
      I'm expecting a Chris Matthews sex scandal to pop up within a a few years at this rate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by night-n-day (January 17, 2008 3:08 pm ET)
         
      I would never defend Matthews because his actions are reprehensible, but FOX and their dancing monkeys have long since earned a permament 'Shut The F** Up', after cheerleading for the war and the endless list of Bush administration f***-ups! Not even Al Qeada has worked as hard as to undermine the very foundation of this country as the foreign-owned FOX network has!
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.