Matthews attacks everyone except Obama. And his attacks are often unfair. As for high profile women available to run for president, he's right on. Hillary is the only one. It's possible a nationally unknown female governor/congresswoman could step up and make it happen, but as of this moment I'm disappointed w/the shortage of such high-profile women. 

It's comical how some people try to silence anyone who speaks against their views. They push PC protection to increase their own power (obviously that currently means PC for race & sex, but no protection for religion). They want to shut down Matthews because he speaks against Hillary. They want to shut down talk radio because it attacks their views. And then, they call everyone who disagrees "fascists." 

The fact that one poster (on the more broad Matthews-Hillary thread) claimed "Matthews doesn't deserve to be on the same network as Keith Olberman, who doesn't personally attack anyone..." made me laugh. I watch MSNBC plenty and Olberman levels more personal attacks against the Republican candidates than anyone to the right of Bill Maure. I think that sometimes people just hear what they want. If you analyzed Matthews more, you could prove he was radically biased against Republicans or radically biased against Democrats -- that's the nature of his attacks.

 

That said, I don't think he's biased or anti-woman. I just think he's off-key a lot.