About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wash. Times' new executive editor, John Solomon, has history of distortion

January 15, 2008 3:40 pm ET
image

7 Comments

On January 15, The Washington Times introduced John Solomon as its new executive editor, succeeding the retiring Wesley Pruden. Solomon previously worked for the Associated Press and, most recently, The Washington Post. Washington Times President Thomas P. McDevitt said of the hiring: "John Solomon's appointment is a great step forward for The Washington Times, and is good news for our readers, staff and advertisers. ... He is a working journalist, innovative manager and skilled leader who can navigate the complicated media landscape while maintaining traditional news values and credibility."

However, as Media Matters for America has documented, like The Washington Times itself, Solomon has been a frequent purveyor of conservative misinformation:

  • Wash. Post ignored own reporting in repeating Freeh allegation (The Washington Post; 12/15/07)
  • Solomon ignored Planned Parenthood support for Obama's abortion votes (The Washington Post; 12/14/07)
  • Solomon ignored facts in reporting distribution of Obama's Hopefund contributions (The Washington Post; 11/30/07)
  • Solomon blamed editor for deletion about GOP fundraiser (washingtonpost.com; 9/05/07)
  • Solomon uncritically quoted Thompson "mocking global warming" (The Washington Post; 7/27/07)
  • Thompson's role as Nixon mole in Watergate probe absent from Solomon's Wash. Post story (The Washington Post; 7/26/07)
  • Wash Post's Baker and Solomon highlighted old disclosures in Clinton books as new (The Washington Post; 5/25/07)
  • Solomon falsely claimed Edwards "opposes" subprime lending (washingtonpost.com; 5/16/07)
  • Solomon -- whose "investigations" fuel right-wing attacks -- suggested Clinton nonprofit is somehow corrupt (The Washington Post; 2/27/07)
  • Wash. Post baselessly linked Abramoff to Democratic fundraisers (The Washington Post; 2/24/07)
  • Solomon baselessly suggested Edwards broke campaign finance law (washingtonpost.com; 1/23/07)
  • Solomon baselessly suggested shady Edwards land deal (The Washington Post; 1/19/07)
  • Drudge misrepresented as "sweetheart land deal" a business transaction by Sen. Reid, described in an article by AP's Solomon (The Drudge Report, The Associated Press; 10/11/06)
  • In its cropping of AP's misleading Reid follow-up, NY Times compounded distortions (The New York Times; 6/02/06)
  • In follow-up article on Reid, Solomon continued pattern of distortion (The Associated Press; 6/01/06)
  • Responding to Media Matters, AP continued to mislead in reporting on Reid (The Associated Press; 5/31/06)
  • Even more serious flaws emerge in AP story about Reid's attendance at boxing matches (The Associated Press; 5/29/06)
  • Fox & Friends further distorted flawed AP report on Reid's boxing tickets (Fox News' Fox & Friends; 5/30/06)
  • Solomon lobbed more faulty ethics accusations at Reid (The Associated Press; 5/29/06)
  • AP continued to mislead on purported Abramoff-Reid link (The Associated Press; 2/11/06)
  • AP left out key facts in report linking Reid, Abramoff (The Associated Press, 2/09/06)
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Brabantio (January 15, 2008 3:49 pm ET)
         

      In other words, he was born to work at the Times.

      No complaint here.  Let him work for a paper that everyone knows is a partisan, cult-owned rag.  A place for everything, and everything in its place.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (January 15, 2008 3:52 pm ET)
         
      So The Washington Post will be jumping sharks with the best of them. Glad I don't have to read them, till they show up here. 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by anotheramerican (January 15, 2008 4:12 pm ET)
         
      MMFA meet kettle.  :-)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by laughinglefty (January 15, 2008 6:18 pm ET)
         
      So the veil of journalistic objectivity has now dropped away from Solomon to reveal his far right partisan operative stripes. I'm sure the corporates at the WaPo will quickly find another shill to fill his boots. Do you think Solomon's bosses at the WaPo knew that he was a slick right wing psuedo journalist who specialized in writing hit pieces on Democrats and shilling for Republicans? How could they not? He was probably hired expressly to do just that. Obviously, the Moonie owned Washington Times recognized his far right partisanship and appreciated his distorted and misleading reporting and wanted it for themselves. At least now, he can no longer hide behind a veneer of objectivity and will be seen as the partisan operative he is.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (January 15, 2008 6:42 pm ET)
           
        Does he have to coronate the Rev. Moon as part of his installation ceremony?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by 123asd123 (January 16, 2008 2:24 pm ET)
         
      test comment for mmfa
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 123asd123 (January 16, 2008 2:39 pm ET)
         
      test comment 2
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • The Washington Times
    Washington Times

    Washington Times
    3600 New York Ave NE
    Washington, DC 20002-1947
    (202) 636-3000