Media still touting "maverick" McCain
SUMMARY: In their coverage of the Michigan Republican primary, numerous media outlets and personalities praised Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain as a "maverick" who has challenged his party. However, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, on several major issues, McCain has taken positions consistent with those of his party.
During coverage of the January 15 Republican primary in Michigan, a number of media outlets and personalities continued a longstanding practice of touting Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (AZ) as a "maverick" who has challenged Washington and his own party, notwithstanding his positions on high-profile issues that are in line with those of his party.
On the January 16 broadcast of MSNBC's Morning Joe, Washington Post national political reporter Dana Milbank claimed that "there are occasional mavericks who will speak out against their party, like John McCain." As purported evidence, Milbank asserted that McCain had "violated" a "taboo" when he called Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson "agents of intolerance" during his 2000 presidential run. However, Milbank did not mention that McCain stated, on the April 2, 2006, edition of NBC's Meet the Press, that he no longer believed Falwell was an "agent of intolerance," or that McCain then delivered the commencement address at Falwell's Liberty University in May 2006. In a May 14, 2006, Washington Post article, Milbank's colleague Dan Balz wrote that McCain's appearance at Liberty University "continued a rapprochement that has been underway for months with a critical constituency in the Republican Party as McCain prepares for another possible campaign in 2008."
On the January 15 broadcast of the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric, correspondent Bob Schieffer claimed that "McCain has always been sort of a maverick. He's always been willing to challenge the authority." Additionally, a January 16 Reuters article described McCain as the "maverick senator" who "has ruffled feathers all over Capitol Hill." The Financial Times reported on January 16 that McCain has a "reputation as an independent-minded maverick." However, absent from all this coverage was any recognition that McCain has moved toward or taken positions consistent with his party on such prominent issues as immigration and tax cuts. As Media Matters for America has repeatedly noted, he has also been one of the most constant and forceful proponents of the Iraq war and its continuation -- hardly a position at odds with his party.
From the January 16 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:
JOE SCARBOROUGH (co-host): But isn't that what really makes your job so easy? The columns that you write week in and week out poking at people. I used to always have people when I was in Congress, 'cause I'd be invited on a lot of the cable shows a lot, that say, who's your PR guy? And I'd say, I don't have a PR guy. I just am willing to tell the truth about my party once in a while. And it's so shocking. But you're exactly right. What makes Washington so screwed up is the fact Democrats will never attack Democrats; Republicans will never attack Republicans. Tribes do not attack their own.
MILBANK: Right. It's all about tribal loyalty. That's your family. I mean, people have brothers and sisters and mothers and children, but that's not their real family. The family is the tribe and it's all about the preservation of the species. You know, the very word "Potomac" means, in the tongue of the Piscataway Indians, "where the goods are brought in." And it's all about bringing in the goods. And if your party is in power, then you'll have the goods and the other party will be scalped. But, you know, there are occasional mavericks who will speak out against their party, like John McCain and --
MIKA BRZEZINSKI (co-host): [Former] Governor [Mike] Huckabee [R-AR].
MILBANK: And something that you did in Congress. And that is -- and we in the media, I call them the Greek chorus, we love people like that. But that's fratricide.
SCARBOROUGH: What about -- it is fratricide and it always catches up to you. The machine always wins. Well, talk about Mike Huckabee. Because that's interesting. Here's a guy that think he's in the tribe --
MILBANK: Nooo.
SCARBOROUGH: The tribe doesn't want him anywhere around. They hate him.
MILBANK: You're not kidding. 'Cause we talk in Potomac land about Judeo-Christian religion and principles, but that's really -- a lot of that's for show. Because what Potomac man worships is public opinion; and the opinion polls are the sacred texts; and the strategists are the shamans, the medicine men who tell us what to do. Now, Huckabee, he represents a very alien, barbaric force to Potomac man and that's a religious conservative. We just don't get it. And in fact, John McCain violated that taboo and called them agents of intolerance, which is why he's having such a tough time out there. But Huckabee really is an alien; he's almost seen as a cannibal here who is eating into the rightful support of really genuine, good Potomac men like Giuliani and Romney.
From the January 15 edition of CBS Evening News with Katie Couric:
COURIC: And, Bob, John McCain can't be all that jazzed about the breakdown so far.
SCHIEFFER: No, I think not. Because you contrast it with what happened the last time. The -- you know, these are Republicans, but they're not necessarily John McCain's voters.
COURIC: Why is that?
SCHIEFFER: Well, you know, John McCain has always been sort of a maverick. He's always been willing to challenge the authority. And a lot of Republicans just have not forgiven him for that. This is not shaping up as the kind of vote that would be good for John McCain.
COURIC: And I think our exit polls are showing that the Republicans who did turn out are more conservative than moderate.















There once was a man named McCain
With silver white hair in his mane
They call him a maverick
Until we throw up sick
I vote Dem, so I'm not to blame
2006 According to the National Journal - Composite Liberal Score's calculations, in 2006, Senator McCain voted more liberal on economic, defense and foreign policy issues than 43.3 percent of the Senators.
2006 According to the National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy's calculations, in 2006, Senator McCain voted more liberal on economic, defense and foreign policy issues than 35 percent of the Senators.
2006 According to the National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy's calculations, in 2006, Senator McCain voted more liberal on foreign policy issues than 40 percent of the Senators.
2006 According to the National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy's calculations, in 2006, Senator McCain voted more liberal on social policy issues than 53 percent of the Senators.
I asgree Dave. But that isn't going to happen and we both know it. So hopefully, the monikers they give these people for entertainments sake have a bit of truth to them. I believe McCain has been a "maverick" on certain issues. That's probably why he has been unsuccessful up until now in obtaining the Republican nomination for President, wouldn't you say?
"I believe McCain has been a "maverick"
The problem isn't whether McCain's a maverick, altho it would be nice if the media questioned their assumption once in awhile. Maybe he is, was, or is a little bit.
The problem is that McCain is THE Maverick(tm).
No other person in either party as far as I know is referred to in the media repetitively as a maverick (or "straight-talker"), even tho surely many others buck their parties just as much or a lot more than McCain.
(And it's not just because McCain's running for president and others aren't. The label has been attached to him for years.)
The reason Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich aren't constantly called "mavericks" is because the media has assigned the label to McCain as if it were copyrighted and trademarked. Out of love, sucking-up, laziness, or all three.
"But that isn't going to happen and we both know it."
Adding: I find the attitude in that statement defeatist. I do not share it. So you must mean someone else when you say "we".
Folks such as Media Matters and a host of bloggers, for example, are trying to do something about the problem and have actually made inroads.
Sorry about that. Those links can be found on this site down towards the bottom of the page.
http://votesmart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=53270
And, these statistics don't even make sense. Number 1 and 2 contradict themselves.
Is it being a "maverick" to pander to the far right after standing up to them in 2000?
If so, then I guess McCain's a maverick.
Nah. He's just a political prostitute.
McCain has been right on treatment of vets and U.S. use of torture. He's been wrong on military force. He's sucked up to BushCo, who gave him Karl Rove's worst treatment in South Carolina. Now the Swift Boats are smearing him in South Carolina, yet again.
This man left Maverick status long ago when he signed onto the worst wing of the Republican Party (I wonder if there's any other part left anymore)