About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

AP failed to note McCain switched positions on Bush tax cuts

January 18, 2008 12:48 pm ET

SUMMARY: The Associated Press reported that Sen. John McCain favors an "extension of expiring tax cuts from Bush's first term," but the article did not point out that McCain changed his position on the Bush tax cuts, opposing the reductions in 2001 and 2003, then voting to extend them in 2006.

31 Comments

In a January 17 article on the "long-term economic plan" proposed by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) while campaigning in South Carolina, the Associated Press reported that McCain favors an "extension of expiring tax cuts from Bush's first term." The AP, however, did not point out that McCain changed his position on the Bush tax cuts. In May 2001, when Congress first considered the tax cuts, McCain said in a May 26, 2001, floor statement that he opposed the bill because "so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle class Americans who most need tax relief." And in 2003, McCain voted against legislation to accelerate the tax reductions enacted in the 2001 bill and to cut taxes on dividends and capital gains. Yet in 2006, McCain voted for the bill extending the 2003 tax cuts.

By contrast, The New York Times reported on January 18 that McCain's economic plan was "designed to reassure voters worried about the economy as well as fiscal conservatives who have been wary of him ever since he initially opposed President Bush's tax cuts."

From the January 17 Associated Press article:

McCain's plan would also establish a permanent research and development tax credit and allow tax breaks for equipment and technology investment. GOP rival Rudy Giuliani has also proposed cutting the corporate tax rate to 25 percent.

The McCain plan does not contain additional tax relief for individuals beyond previous proposals to repeal the Alternate [sic] Minimum Tax, a tax originally designed to fall on the wealthiest but which each year snags more middle-income taxpayers who claim a lot of deductions; and extension of expiring tax cuts from Bush's first term, a course also favored by others campaigning for the Republican nomination. "We've got to make these tax cuts permanent," McCain said.

"One of the reasons we have the difficulties we do is that spending went out of control," McCain said.

Among McCain's opponents in the South Carolina Republican primary Saturday, Mitt Romney said, "it makes sense for Congress to take immediate action" and he'd have his own plan soon. Fred Thompson, meanwhile, said it's not time for the government to give the economy a jolt.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 1:03 pm ET)
         

      Flip-flops are for Dems: this is OK because John is a Republican. No need to worry about the Media calling him on it - although one of his opponents might, during the contest for the nomination.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (January 18, 2008 1:09 pm ET)
           
        The media has rightly called Romney and Giuliani on their flip-flops.  Romney for healthcare, abortion, illegal immigration - as well as Giulianis on illegal immigration, various social issues......to say they only do it to Democrats is silly.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ConstanceRifleII (January 18, 2008 1:17 pm ET)
             
          Tommy, I agree, but I doubt the labels will stick like they did in '04.  My feeling is, if it's a lie, it'll stick. If it's not a lie, it'll go by the wayside.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:57 pm ET)
             
          To some extent you are correct, and I was wrong: some Republican flips are indeed called out in the press. I haven't yet seen John McCain being lambasted for his, though so perhaps the exclusion is specific?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (January 18, 2008 3:23 pm ET)
               
            And I will give you McCain, for to some extent he is still a media favorite....so he probably is given more a pass than some of the others, I believe.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (January 18, 2008 1:20 pm ET)
         

      Weren't these the same tax cuts that the cons kept telling us were the answer to our economic woes?  More money in our pockets, more spending, good times for all, etc.

      So how well is that scenario playing out?

      Before anyone jumps down my throat with, "So you'd rather pay more???"

      NO, I love lower taxes as much as anyone else, but depending solely on tax cuts as the answer to every economic woe facing working America has proven to be nothing but a right wing pipe dream. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (January 18, 2008 1:22 pm ET)
           
        I agree, to rely solely on tax cuts without cuts in government spending is a  disaster, as we have seen. Do both.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by optimus prick (January 18, 2008 1:37 pm ET)
         
      as usual, mccain gets a pass, cause he can do no wrong.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:49 pm ET)
         

      comment #6

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:49 pm ET)
         
      Comment #7
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
         
      Comment #8
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
         
      Comment #9
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
         
      Comment #10
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
         
      Comment #11
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
         
      Comment #12
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
         
      Comment #13
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
         
      Comment #14
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
         

      Comment #15

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
         
      Comment #16
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
         
      Comment #17
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:51 pm ET)
         
      Comment #18
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:52 pm ET)
         
      Comment #19
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:52 pm ET)
         
      Comment #20
      Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 2:52 pm ET)
         
      Comment #21
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ConstanceRifleII (January 18, 2008 3:13 pm ET)
           
        Conley (speaking of Conley, they're the company that prints our magazine), is the some kinda joke? or is MMfA really screwing with you?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by BillJ-MN (January 18, 2008 4:34 pm ET)
             
          Given very recent history, I'm inclined to blame MMFA.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by conleytgwinn (January 18, 2008 9:26 pm ET)
             
          Those numbered comments were the only way I could see what had been written: some sort of "if x < 20, show - dead" bug, but raising the count to 21 resolved that problem on this thread.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (January 18, 2008 7:22 pm ET)
         
      The digital equivilent of bread crums?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by right-winger (January 18, 2008 7:33 pm ET)
         

      NOW THAT THE RNC, AND FOX NEWS SEE THAT MCCAIN CAN BEAT HILLAY THOSE SAME PEOPLE WHO WENT AFTER HIM IN 2000 ARE DOING WHAT REPUBLICANS ALWAYS DO SLEEP WITH THE DEVIL, TURN IN THERE MOTHER TO WIN AN ELECTION. I LOVE WATCHING FOX NEWS KISSING UP TOO MCCAIN THE SAME MAN THEY HELPED DESTORY IN 2000. AND FOR THE MEDIA NOW THAT IT LOOKS LIKE THERE GUY MCCAIN IS BACK IN THE HUNT THEY WILL LET EVERYTHING HE DO WRONG SLIDE JUST LIKE THEY DID FOR BUSH IN 2000 BECAUSE THEY WHAT HIM IN THE WHITEHOUSE.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by paleocon (January 18, 2008 7:51 pm ET)
         
      we the people have not failed to note where mccain has switched his opinion....
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Associated Press
    Associated Press

    The Associated Press
    450 W. 33rd St.
    New York, NY 10001

    Main Number
    +1-212-621-1500