CNN's Blitzer, Cafferty, and King rewrite history to claim that Giuliani skipped Iowa and New Hampshire
SUMMARY: CNN's John King, Wolf Blitzer, and Jack Cafferty all mischaracterized Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign strategy in the early states, repeating the media myth that he chose not to compete in Iowa and New Hampshire. In fact, Giuliani himself has denied that his strategy was to skip the early states, telling NBC's Matt Lauer, "We've actually spent the most time in New Hampshire and then Florida is right behind that."
On the January 21 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, CNN chief national correspondent John King, anchor Wolf Blitzer, and commentator Jack Cafferty all mischaracterized former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign strategy in the early states, repeating the media myth that he chose not to compete in Iowa and New Hampshire. During the first hour of the show, King falsely claimed that "Giuliani's strategy all along has been, forget about Iowa, forget about New Hampshire, forget about South Carolina, essentially saying he could sit out the early innings of the game and then jump-start with a big victory here in Florida." At the top of the second hour, Blitzer falsely claimed that "Florida will be the first and most crucial test for Rudy Giuliani. He's staked almost everything on that state -- foregoing Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina." Later, Cafferty stated, "Well, the state of Florida may answer all of the questions when it comes to Rudy Giuliani's political future. The former New York mayor has staked practically his entire campaign on winning Florida. His strategy all along -- skip the early races." And later in the second hour, Blitzer again claimed, "It's a very risky strategy -- Republican candidate Rudy Giuliani opting to forego the early primary caucus states to focus almost exclusively on Florida, which holds its primary one week from tomorrow."
However, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented (here, here, here, and here), Giuliani did not "opt[] to forgo the early primary caucus states to focus almost exclusively on Florida." Indeed, Giuliani himself denied that his strategy was to skip the early states. On the January 8 edition of NBC's Today, co-host Matt Lauer asked Giuliani: "Is that the strategy? You kind of bypass Iowa and New Hampshire and wait for Florida and New York and California?" Giuliani replied: "No, I wouldn't put it that way. What I would say is, we put a lot of time and attention into some of the states that are coming up later, like Florida. We've actually spent the most time in New Hampshire and then Florida is right behind that."
Some media falsely reported that "Iowa never played a role in [Giuliani's] strategy" and that "he barely attempted to go" to the state. In fact, an August 8, 2007, Associated Press article reported that Giuliani said: "Our largest staff contingent is now in Iowa. ... We're going to make a big effort in Iowa. We're making a big effort and our strategy was to focus on the caucuses." Other reports noted that Giuliani was "100 percent committed to winning Iowa," had made "20 stops" in the state, and maintained 12 paid staffers in two offices there.
Additionally, after some in the media had reported that Giuliani was "skipping New Hampshire," ABC News deputy political director Karen Travers and senior political correspondent Jake Tapper reported in a January 8 ABCNews.com article that "statistics compiled by ABC News indicate that he [Giuliani] was clearly competing to win in the Granite State as hard -- if not harder -- than many of his rivals." The article noted: "Statistics compiled by ABC News Political Unit and ABC News' team of off-air reporters indicate that Giuliani held more events in this first-in-the-nation primary state than any other Republican except for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in neighboring Massachusetts. He also spent more on TV ads than anyone except for Romney and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz." Specifically, the article reported that Giuliani held 126 events in New Hampshire and spent $2.5 million on television spots through January 1.
From the January 21 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
BLITZER: Our chief national correspondent, John King, is joining us now from Orlando. John, Giuliani's strategy has been to focus in like a laser beam on Florida. Here's the question: Is it working?
KING: Well, Wolf, let's use a baseball metaphor. Today, earlier today, the Yankees' center fielder, Johnny Damon, appeared here with Rudy Giuliani. And Giuliani's strategy all along has been, forget about Iowa, forget about New Hampshire, forget about South Carolina, essentially saying he could sit out the early innings of the game and then jump-start with a big victory here in Florida. Well, more and more of that strategy is being called into question.
[...]
BLITZER: For the Republican hopefuls, everything right now is all about Florida. Its GOP primary is one week from tomorrow. Florida Democrats have had their primary effectively canceled by the national Democratic Party for moving up the primary without the party's permission.
Florida will be the first and most crucial test for Rudy Giuliani. He's staked almost everything on that state, foregoing Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina.
[...]
CAFFERTY: Well, the state of Florida may answer all of the questions when it comes to Rudy Giuliani's political future. The former New York mayor has staked practically his entire campaign on winning Florida. His strategy all along: skip the early races. So far, there have been six of them, and he is 0-for the election campaign, focused rather on later delegate-rich states like Florida.
But it might not be working. Not only has Giuliani failed to win anything up to this point, but the one-time national front-runner has now finished far back in the Republican pack in all of the contests held so far. He placed behind Ron Paul in Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, and South Carolina. Giuliani is calling Florida "our home field," and he says he thinks he's going to win Florida, and if he does, he says he thinks he'll get the nomination, but he admits that a loss, a bad loss could be crippling, his words.
[...]
BLITZER: It's a very risky strategy -- Republican candidate Rudy Giuliani opting to forego the early primary caucus states to focus almost exclusively on Florida, which holds its primary one week from tomorrow.
GIULIANI [video clip]: The best thing for us to do was to concentrate on Florida, where we think we can make a very, very strong showing. And I think our strategy has kind of worked out because this is a wide open field. They all have to come down here. And we think we have sort of set the agenda here.
BLITZER: Our chief national correspondent John King is joining us in Orlando. Johnny -- John, Giuliani has everything staked out on Florida because of his poor performances in other states. Are they starting to get nervous about it, or do they still insist they're confident?
KING: Well, their public line, Wolf, is that they are full of confidence and they expect a victory here on the 29th. But if you watch the Giuliani campaign, you can see their nervousness. He is now being much more personal in his criticism of John McCain and Mitt Romney, saying they opposed or equivocated backing the Bush tax cut debate of 2001. You also see the mayor getting more aggressive in his campaigning here.
Their strategy was based on a few assumptions that haven't worked out, and one of them was that by the time Florida came up, John McCain would be significantly weakened or wounded and that Rudy Giuliani would step into the leadership national security void. Instead, McCain comes here fresh from a victory in South Carolina.
From the January 8 edition of NBC's Today:
LAUER: So, is it true? Is that the strategy? You kind of bypass Iowa and New Hampshire and wait for Florida and New York and California?
GIULIANI: No, I wouldn't put it that way. What I would say is, we put a lot of time and attention into some of the states that are coming up later, like Florida. We've actually spent the most time in New Hampshire and then Florida is right behind that.
LAUER: If you've spent the most time in New Hampshire, how do you feel about where you're polling right now, because you're -
GIULIANI: Well, we'll find out.
LAUER: Because you're polling in the fourth or fifth position. So what's that say about your candidacy?
GIULIANI: We'll find out. We put a lot of time in in New Hampshire. We put an equal amount of time into Florida. And then, in comparison to the other candidates, some of the other candidates put a lot more time into Iowa and New Hampshire. The main thing is, this is a 29-state primary caucus in one month. Whoever wins 16, 18, is going to be in the best position. And it's about message. I think our message of lower taxes, restraint on government spending, our message of remaining on offense in the terrorists' war against us is one that is going to work in enough of the states that we'll get nominated.















This is just a ridiculous item that MMFA keeps pushing. Of course, Giuliani is not going to admit, prior to Iowa and NH, that he is "skipping" either one - do you honestly expect him to admit that before they voted?
However, his overall strategy is absolutely correct as noted by these CNN reporters/journalists - he did "skip" them for all intents and purposes.
Groooannnnn....you know Tommy, if your first impulse wasn't always to go for the "Why Is This Here MMFA Is Wrong" button, you might actually READ the article you are allegedly commenting on. Listen carefully: Giuliani spent millions of dollars in New Hampshire. When his poll numbers collapsed anyway, he pulled out. Then when he did badly, his media apologists went right along with his "I wasnt really competing there" excuse.
This is called MISINFORMATION, and the PURPOSE of MMFA is to EXPOSE MISINFORMATION in the MEDIA.
Whether Giuliani's pulling out of New Hampshire after spending millions there turns out to be the right strategy is totally NOT THE POINT. The POINT is that Giuliani keeps moving the bar and delaying a "real showdown" with the voters, and the media keeps accepting his lame excuses and presenting them as facts.
I know this post is a little repetitive, but judging from postings you've made in the past, repetition might be a real asset in helping you understand.
You're right, your repetetiveness doesn't help, Rudy's strategy has always hinged on Florida, that is the point these reporters are making - in other words, he de-emphasized, or skipped, or shunned, or dismissed, or whatever, the early primaries to focus his attention, resources and time on Florida.....you can nitpick the details of how that was or wasn't done, but it doesn't change his overall strategy.
But keep repeating it anyway.
Did you miss this bit tommy?
''Indeed, Giuliani himself denied that his strategy was to skip the early states. On the January 8 edition of NBC's Today, co-host Matt Lauer asked Giuliani: "Is that the strategy? You kind of bypass Iowa and New Hampshire and wait for Florida and New York and California?" Giuliani replied: "No, I wouldn't put it that way. What I would say is, we put a lot of time and attention into some of the states that are coming up later, like Florida. We've actually spent the most time in New Hampshire and then Florida is right behind that."
Its not ridiculous at all. The media are covering for Rudy's failure in these states by describing a campaign plan which the man himself has refuted. These things add up Tommy.
Um, if Giuliani's strategy "all along" was to skip the early contests, then WHY was he doing all those town hall meetings in New Hampshire back in November and December? WHY did people living in New England see one Giuliani tv commercial after another during that time? WHY DID HE SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN AD BUYS IN NEW ENGLAND DURING THAT TIME?
Lame, lame, lame. Giuliani didn't "skip" anything. He's like a little boy who runs a race, realizes he's about to lose, and just walks off the track loudly announcing "It didnt count 'cause I wasn't trying to win, you know!"
MMFA is absolutely correct to call the Media on it's willingness to aid and abet this total fraud. You, on the other hand, have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about.
Um, if Giuliani's strategy "all along" was to skip the early contests, then WHY was he doing all those town hall meetings in New Hampshire back in November and December? WHY did people living in New England see one Giuliani tv commercial after another during that time? WHY DID HE SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN AD BUYS IN NEW ENGLAND DURING THAT TIME?
jjamele,
IMO, it was all part of a bizarre plan for the general election. Now before you say I'm nuts, keep in mind Rudy was leading in all the National Polls for a long time. I think his master plan was to concentrate on Florida, but at least make some effort to advertise & make appearances in other states in an attempt to at least be seen & heard by the voters.
I think it's pretty clear his rather odd plan has backfired as he's no longer doing well in the National Polls.
I wonder why it's worse for him to just admit that he's not making the effort in early states than to say he is campaigning there and then come in at the bottom. It would seem to me that if he's not making that effort, and knows that he's going to get killed anyway, saying that he is campaigning makes him look incompetent and unpopular.
One line that strikes me in this is that this was his strategy "all along". If that's the case, why doesn't his campaign just say about NH and Iowa "we have people there, we've been there, but that's not our priority"? Instead he talks about how NH is what he tried hardest for, and how he had the most people working for him in Iowa. It seems more likely that he was trying to put in the effort there, but when he saw early indications that it wasn't going to do any good, he changed the strategy. Is anyone more familiar with the polls and timeline who can support or refute that theory?
In the long run it probably won't make much difference. Anyone who's trailing McCain by 10 points in his own state doesn't have much hope.
Someone forgot to tell Giuliani that before he spent so much money campaigning in Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan....
So much money, in fact, that his staff had to forgo their paychecks this month- and this for a candidate who had raised tons of money yet hadn't even really started to campaign yet? Give me a break.
Again, Giuliani can make all the excuses he wants, that's his right. It's the media swallowing and repeating them that's the issue here. CNN, etc. is perfectly aware of how hard Giuliani campaigned in the early states and how much money he spent. To carry the "He wasn't really trying to win the early contests" banner for him is just irresponsible and unbecoming behavior for any journalist.
Saying something is "common knowledge" doesn't make it so, any more than saying something is "common sense" means that it's true. Nothing in Giuliani's actions from July 2007 to December 2007 indicates that he was planning to skip the early contests. You can hypothesize all you want about Giuliani's strategy; there's no evidence that it involved skipping the early contests. Giuliani didnt spend tons of money and time in other parts of the country as part of some "grand plan" for November 2008- he was already the best-known of the candidates, why would he blow his treasury doing that?
If he planned to start in Florida, it seems to me he would have spent just enough in the early states to remain visible (he spent MUCH more than that) and threw his whole load into Florida. He didn't do that.
Giuliani didn't "intend" to skip all the states up to Florida. he campaigned actively in New Hampshire -- in fact, of the Republican candidates, only Romney of next door Massachusetts spent more time in New Hampshire than did Giuliani. In addition, as a Vermonter who's also in the area reached by northern New Hampshire media, I can say first hand that Giuliani blanketed New Hampshire with TV ads right up until the day he decided to cut his losses and make a last stand in Florida.
Jjamele is correct -- Giuliani took to the field, found out he wasn't going to win by acclimation, and then ran away yelling that he didn't want to win and wasn't really trying in the first place. This tactic should be familiar to New Yorkers, who saw it first hand when Giuliani ran for the US Senate in 2000 -- he exited that race with his tail between his legs as soon as he found out the seat wasn't going to be handed to him on a silver platter.
Giuliani was at the top of national polls until late 2007. His incredible crash and burn is without parallel in modern presidential politics. Political Scientists will use the Giuliani debacle for decades as an example of how NOT to run a campaign.
The media needs to quit pimping Giuliani as a major candidate -- he's finished behind Ron Paul almost everywhere. Paul is now uninvited from campaign debates on the grounds that he's not a serious candidates -- well, why is Giuliani, the guy finishing BEHIND Paul, considered "serious?"
You may have a difficult time convincing Michael Cooper of the New York Times of that. The Times article I refer to clearly contradicts your assertions. Perhaps you are right, but I tend to lean towards what is given to me by a journalist who is familiar with the campaign. Read the article.
Clearly the strategy has been to focus on the bigger states starting with Florida from the beginning. The article addresses the push in New Hampshire as well. The reality is that the Guiliani strategy has been and is common knowledge, to most anyway.
You may have a difficult time convincing Michael Cooper of the New York Times of that. The Times article I refer to clearly contradicts your assertions.
No offense but why should anyone care about Cooper's take on the issue?
Rudy can say, and Tommy can agree, that after he loses in Florida, he really wasn't competing there anyway.
As a matter of fact, when its all said and done...Rudy and Tommy can claim neither ever took this campaign seriously and were merely prepping for 2012.
Chris, you are basically saying "what are you going to believe, this article, or your own eyes?"
I really think I must have taken crazy pills here. I'll try one more time: Rudy Giuliani spent millions of dollars and MONTHS running from New Hampshire to Michigan to Iowa to South Carolina campaigning throughout the fall of 2007. When his poll numbers continued to fall, he pulled out. Now, based on a newspaper article and the bleating media, you tell me that "Giuliani's intent all along was to skip the early contests."
This is ridiculous. I don't need to find some magic document that says "Giuliani intended to compete in the early primaries and caucuses." I saw the ads and I read the papers. It actually takes a pretty impressive feat of self-hypnosis IMO to convince anyone to buy the "hey he wasn't competing argument." It's even more bizarre to argue "he never PLANNED to compete." Really weird.
GIULLIANI campaigned HARD in New Hampshire. ONLY ROMNEY made more appearances, or spent more money. Hundreds of appearances and millions of dollars in ads, Giulliani could hardly have been campaigning HARDER.
Sure, Giulliani EXPECTS to win Florida, and his "strategy" is that a win in Florida will catapult him into frontrunner status ... it will do the same for ANY candidate who wins there.
But, did Giulliani "skip" New Hampshire? Not by any sane or rational interpretation. He campaigned HARD, and he LOST. Lost BAD. Was roundly REJECTED. All his work and all his appearance and all the money he spent did not translate into votes.
Now, if we are playing semantical GAMES, we could say "for all intents and purposes" he "skipped" New Hampshire, IF we define "intents and purposes" as a favorable vote count and "skipped" to mean he FAILED.
The MSM continue to prop up Giulliani, simply because they will not give up on ANY CHANCE the GOP might have to be competitive. For a while there, we were told, Fred Thompson was the "conservative savior" who would gain frontrunner status and carry it to the White House. We were told this by, yes, THE MEDIA. Now it's McCain who is the "great white male hope", and will be getting all the great press coverage (while the Dems are portrayed as being mired in mud and "RACE" fighting).
Ah, but McCain is an unlikely champion for the Rightwing ... most conservatives CAN'T STAND HIM. What to do? Well, MAYBE, just MAYBE, Giulliani (who has been described as "Bush on Steroids," sure to please NeoCons) will pull off his "Florida Strategy", so he can't be written off.
But to protect his candidacy, his miserable losses in the early primaries IN WHICH HE CAMPAIGNED HARD will have to be played down and excused away.
And the COMPLIANT MSM is only to happy to rewrite that history. The LYING MEDIA will tell us, hoping to FOOL us, that Giulliani simply "skipped" New Hampshire. THIS IS A BLATANT LIE AND MISINFORMATION FORWARDED WITH THE CLEAR INTENT TO DECEIVE!!!!
Ah, but it WORKED. Tommy is completely fooled, totally on board with the false narrative and LIES. That's ONE vote for Rudy!!!
Thank you, Tex. You said it better than I could. I'm just amazed at the obliviousness of some of the people on this thread.