About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Blitzer, Cafferty, and King rewrite history to claim that Giuliani skipped Iowa and New Hampshire

January 22, 2008 4:58 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: CNN's John King, Wolf Blitzer, and Jack Cafferty all mischaracterized Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign strategy in the early states, repeating the media myth that he chose not to compete in Iowa and New Hampshire. In fact, Giuliani himself has denied that his strategy was to skip the early states, telling NBC's Matt Lauer, "We've actually spent the most time in New Hampshire and then Florida is right behind that."

33 Comments

On the January 21 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, CNN chief national correspondent John King, anchor Wolf Blitzer, and commentator Jack Cafferty all mischaracterized former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign strategy in the early states, repeating the media myth that he chose not to compete in Iowa and New Hampshire. During the first hour of the show, King falsely claimed that "Giuliani's strategy all along has been, forget about Iowa, forget about New Hampshire, forget about South Carolina, essentially saying he could sit out the early innings of the game and then jump-start with a big victory here in Florida." At the top of the second hour, Blitzer falsely claimed that "Florida will be the first and most crucial test for Rudy Giuliani. He's staked almost everything on that state -- foregoing Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina." Later, Cafferty stated, "Well, the state of Florida may answer all of the questions when it comes to Rudy Giuliani's political future. The former New York mayor has staked practically his entire campaign on winning Florida. His strategy all along -- skip the early races." And later in the second hour, Blitzer again claimed, "It's a very risky strategy -- Republican candidate Rudy Giuliani opting to forego the early primary caucus states to focus almost exclusively on Florida, which holds its primary one week from tomorrow."

However, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented (here, here, here, and here), Giuliani did not "opt[] to forgo the early primary caucus states to focus almost exclusively on Florida." Indeed, Giuliani himself denied that his strategy was to skip the early states. On the January 8 edition of NBC's Today, co-host Matt Lauer asked Giuliani: "Is that the strategy? You kind of bypass Iowa and New Hampshire and wait for Florida and New York and California?" Giuliani replied: "No, I wouldn't put it that way. What I would say is, we put a lot of time and attention into some of the states that are coming up later, like Florida. We've actually spent the most time in New Hampshire and then Florida is right behind that."

Some media falsely reported that "Iowa never played a role in [Giuliani's] strategy" and that "he barely attempted to go" to the state. In fact, an August 8, 2007, Associated Press article reported that Giuliani said: "Our largest staff contingent is now in Iowa. ... We're going to make a big effort in Iowa. We're making a big effort and our strategy was to focus on the caucuses." Other reports noted that Giuliani was "100 percent committed to winning Iowa," had made "20 stops" in the state, and maintained 12 paid staffers in two offices there.

Additionally, after some in the media had reported that Giuliani was "skipping New Hampshire," ABC News deputy political director Karen Travers and senior political correspondent Jake Tapper reported in a January 8 ABCNews.com article that "statistics compiled by ABC News indicate that he [Giuliani] was clearly competing to win in the Granite State as hard -- if not harder -- than many of his rivals." The article noted: "Statistics compiled by ABC News Political Unit and ABC News' team of off-air reporters indicate that Giuliani held more events in this first-in-the-nation primary state than any other Republican except for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in neighboring Massachusetts. He also spent more on TV ads than anyone except for Romney and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz." Specifically, the article reported that Giuliani held 126 events in New Hampshire and spent $2.5 million on television spots through January 1.

From the January 21 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: Our chief national correspondent, John King, is joining us now from Orlando. John, Giuliani's strategy has been to focus in like a laser beam on Florida. Here's the question: Is it working?

KING: Well, Wolf, let's use a baseball metaphor. Today, earlier today, the Yankees' center fielder, Johnny Damon, appeared here with Rudy Giuliani. And Giuliani's strategy all along has been, forget about Iowa, forget about New Hampshire, forget about South Carolina, essentially saying he could sit out the early innings of the game and then jump-start with a big victory here in Florida. Well, more and more of that strategy is being called into question.

[...]

BLITZER: For the Republican hopefuls, everything right now is all about Florida. Its GOP primary is one week from tomorrow. Florida Democrats have had their primary effectively canceled by the national Democratic Party for moving up the primary without the party's permission.

Florida will be the first and most crucial test for Rudy Giuliani. He's staked almost everything on that state, foregoing Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina.

[...]

CAFFERTY: Well, the state of Florida may answer all of the questions when it comes to Rudy Giuliani's political future. The former New York mayor has staked practically his entire campaign on winning Florida. His strategy all along: skip the early races. So far, there have been six of them, and he is 0-for the election campaign, focused rather on later delegate-rich states like Florida.

But it might not be working. Not only has Giuliani failed to win anything up to this point, but the one-time national front-runner has now finished far back in the Republican pack in all of the contests held so far. He placed behind Ron Paul in Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, and South Carolina. Giuliani is calling Florida "our home field," and he says he thinks he's going to win Florida, and if he does, he says he thinks he'll get the nomination, but he admits that a loss, a bad loss could be crippling, his words.

[...]

BLITZER: It's a very risky strategy -- Republican candidate Rudy Giuliani opting to forego the early primary caucus states to focus almost exclusively on Florida, which holds its primary one week from tomorrow.

GIULIANI [video clip]: The best thing for us to do was to concentrate on Florida, where we think we can make a very, very strong showing. And I think our strategy has kind of worked out because this is a wide open field. They all have to come down here. And we think we have sort of set the agenda here.

BLITZER: Our chief national correspondent John King is joining us in Orlando. Johnny -- John, Giuliani has everything staked out on Florida because of his poor performances in other states. Are they starting to get nervous about it, or do they still insist they're confident?

KING: Well, their public line, Wolf, is that they are full of confidence and they expect a victory here on the 29th. But if you watch the Giuliani campaign, you can see their nervousness. He is now being much more personal in his criticism of John McCain and Mitt Romney, saying they opposed or equivocated backing the Bush tax cut debate of 2001. You also see the mayor getting more aggressive in his campaigning here.

Their strategy was based on a few assumptions that haven't worked out, and one of them was that by the time Florida came up, John McCain would be significantly weakened or wounded and that Rudy Giuliani would step into the leadership national security void. Instead, McCain comes here fresh from a victory in South Carolina.

From the January 8 edition of NBC's Today:

LAUER: So, is it true? Is that the strategy? You kind of bypass Iowa and New Hampshire and wait for Florida and New York and California?

GIULIANI: No, I wouldn't put it that way. What I would say is, we put a lot of time and attention into some of the states that are coming up later, like Florida. We've actually spent the most time in New Hampshire and then Florida is right behind that.

LAUER: If you've spent the most time in New Hampshire, how do you feel about where you're polling right now, because you're -

GIULIANI: Well, we'll find out.

LAUER: Because you're polling in the fourth or fifth position. So what's that say about your candidacy?

GIULIANI: We'll find out. We put a lot of time in in New Hampshire. We put an equal amount of time into Florida. And then, in comparison to the other candidates, some of the other candidates put a lot more time into Iowa and New Hampshire. The main thing is, this is a 29-state primary caucus in one month. Whoever wins 16, 18, is going to be in the best position. And it's about message. I think our message of lower taxes, restraint on government spending, our message of remaining on offense in the terrorists' war against us is one that is going to work in enough of the states that we'll get nominated.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by JLyons (January 22, 2008 5:01 pm ET)
         
      Rudy is toast yet the msm loves him. Sickening.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (January 22, 2008 5:06 pm ET)
         

      This is just a ridiculous item that MMFA keeps pushing. Of course, Giuliani is not going to admit, prior to Iowa and NH, that he is "skipping" either one - do you honestly expect him to admit that before they voted? 

      However, his overall strategy is absolutely correct as noted by these CNN reporters/journalists - he did "skip" them for all intents and purposes.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by greekfurnace (January 22, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
           
        ...and I don't really get it. Who's giving Rudy this wonderful advice? The MSM does give him far more credit than he deserves.  Will be happy when he's out of the race.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (January 22, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
             
          I guess next week will determine whether Rudy was smart, or stupid......pundits can offer their opinions all day long on the validity of Rudy's strategy, but it's still unknown whether it's a good one, or not.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (January 22, 2008 5:41 pm ET)
               

            Groooannnnn....you know Tommy, if your first impulse wasn't always to go for the "Why Is This Here MMFA Is Wrong" button, you might actually READ the article you are allegedly commenting on.  Listen carefully:  Giuliani spent millions of dollars in New Hampshire.  When his poll numbers collapsed anyway, he pulled out.  Then when he did badly, his media apologists went right along with his "I wasnt really competing there" excuse.  

            This is called MISINFORMATION, and the PURPOSE of MMFA is to EXPOSE MISINFORMATION in the MEDIA.  

            Whether Giuliani's pulling out of New Hampshire after spending millions there turns out to be the right strategy is totally NOT THE POINT.  The POINT is that Giuliani keeps moving the bar and delaying a "real showdown" with the voters, and the media keeps accepting his lame excuses and presenting them as facts.  

            I know this post is a little repetitive, but judging from postings you've made in the past, repetition might be a real asset in helping you understand. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (January 22, 2008 5:48 pm ET)
                 

              You're right, your repetetiveness doesn't help, Rudy's strategy has always hinged on Florida, that is the point these reporters are making - in other words, he de-emphasized, or skipped, or shunned, or dismissed, or whatever, the early primaries to focus his attention, resources and time on Florida.....you can nitpick the details of how that was or wasn't done, but it doesn't change his overall strategy.

              But keep repeating it anyway. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by jjamele2880 (January 22, 2008 6:03 pm ET)
                   
                Wow, there's no point in talking to you, is there?  So Giuliani spent millions of dollars on ad buys in New England because he intended to skip New Hampshire all along, huh?  So he gave speeches in Iowa days before the caucuses because he was skipping that contest, was he?  Well, whatever.  Just because you want to believe what you want to believe and to hell with the facts, doesn't mean the media should act that way.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by TomJoad (January 22, 2008 5:27 pm ET)
           

        Did you miss this bit tommy?

        ''Indeed, Giuliani himself denied that his strategy was to skip the early states. On the January 8 edition of NBC's Today, co-host Matt Lauer asked Giuliani: "Is that the strategy? You kind of bypass Iowa and New Hampshire and wait for Florida and New York and California?" Giuliani replied: "No, I wouldn't put it that way. What I would say is, we put a lot of time and attention into some of the states that are coming up later, like Florida. We've actually spent the most time in New Hampshire and then Florida is right behind that."

         Its not ridiculous at all. The media are covering for Rudy's failure in these states by describing a campaign plan which the man himself has refuted. These things add up Tommy.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (January 22, 2008 5:29 pm ET)
             
          No, I already addressed your "bit".........no candidate in their right mind is ever going to admit they are skipping a primary, or don't care if they win - that is absurd.  Giuliani's strategy from the beginning was to hold off until Florida, whether that was smart or not remains to be seen.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by TomJoad (January 22, 2008 5:33 pm ET)
               
            Oh ok, so you're presuming to speak on behalf of Rudy Guiliani despite him having explictly stated the opposite of what you're saying... hey look, you might be right, but it doesnt change the flow of events as media matters has highlighted them. So it's not a ridiculous thread.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (January 22, 2008 5:40 pm ET)
                 
              No, the point of this thread is to discredit these CNN reporters, or show some bias, or maybe they are taking the term "skip" to literally?  In any event, the fact is that CNN is characterizing Rudy's strategy correctly, and to insinuate otherwise is what the misinformation should be.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (January 22, 2008 6:15 pm ET)
                   
                Are you really trying to argue it depends what "skip" means?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (January 22, 2008 6:26 pm ET)
                     
                  No, in this context "skip" does not mean 100% ignore, it means as far as political strategy goes that Rudys was to concentrate on Florida and take his chances on the insignificance of possible earlier poorer showings, in the long run.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (January 22, 2008 7:09 pm ET)
                       
                    Apparently "skip" means whatever suits Giuliani's political agenda and the media is willing to go along with it.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (January 22, 2008 5:46 pm ET)
               

            Um, if Giuliani's strategy "all along" was to skip the early contests, then WHY was he doing all those town hall meetings in New Hampshire back in November and December?  WHY did people living in New England see one Giuliani tv commercial after another during that time?  WHY DID HE SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN AD BUYS IN NEW ENGLAND DURING THAT TIME?

            Lame, lame, lame.  Giuliani didn't "skip" anything.  He's like a little boy who runs a race, realizes he's about to lose, and just walks off the track loudly announcing "It didnt count 'cause I wasn't trying to win, you know!"

            MMFA is absolutely correct to call the Media on it's willingness to aid and abet this total fraud.  You, on the other hand, have absolutely NO idea what you are talking about.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (January 22, 2008 6:47 pm ET)
                 

              Um, if Giuliani's strategy "all along" was to skip the early contests, then WHY was he doing all those town hall meetings in New Hampshire back in November and December?  WHY did people living in New England see one Giuliani tv commercial after another during that time?  WHY DID HE SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN AD BUYS IN NEW ENGLAND DURING THAT TIME?

              jjamele,

              IMO, it was all part of a bizarre plan for the general election. Now before you say I'm nuts, keep in mind Rudy was leading in all the National Polls for a long time. I think his master plan was to concentrate on Florida, but at least make some effort to advertise & make appearances in other states in an attempt to at least be seen & heard by the voters.

              I think it's pretty clear his rather odd plan has backfired as he's no longer doing well in the National Polls.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (January 22, 2008 5:35 pm ET)
           

        I wonder why it's worse for him to just admit that he's not making the effort in early states than to say he is campaigning there and then come in at the bottom.   It would seem to me that if he's not making that effort, and knows that he's going to get killed anyway, saying that he is campaigning makes him look incompetent and unpopular.

        One line that strikes me in this is that this was his strategy "all along".  If that's the case, why doesn't his campaign just say about NH and Iowa "we have people there, we've been there, but that's not our priority"?  Instead he talks about how NH is what he tried hardest for, and how he had the most people working for him in Iowa.  It seems more likely that he was trying to put in the effort there, but when he saw early indications that it wasn't going to do any good, he changed the strategy.  Is anyone more familiar with the polls and timeline who can support or refute that theory?

        In the long run it probably won't make much difference.  Anyone who's trailing McCain by 10 points in his own state doesn't have much hope.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by achrispage6992 (January 22, 2008 6:04 pm ET)
         
      It's pretty much a foregone conclusion that the strategy of hte Guliani campaign was to forego the early states and focus on the bigger ones. According to this: nytimes.com/2007/01/05/nyregion/05cnd-rudy.html?ex=1325653200&...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (January 22, 2008 6:14 pm ET)
           

        Someone forgot to tell Giuliani that before he spent so much money campaigning in Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan....

        So much money, in fact, that his staff had to forgo their paychecks this month- and this for a candidate who had raised tons of money yet hadn't even really started to campaign yet?  Give me a break.

        Again, Giuliani can make all the excuses he wants, that's his right.  It's the media swallowing and repeating them that's the issue here.  CNN, etc. is perfectly aware of how hard Giuliani campaigned in the early states and how much money he spent.  To carry the "He wasn't really trying to win the early contests" banner for him is just irresponsible and unbecoming behavior for any journalist. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by achrispage6992 (January 22, 2008 6:24 pm ET)
             
          It seems I couldn't get the link to work correctly. I thought I had learned how to do that but oh well. I urge you to read the article though. It debunks your stance on this issue. His campaign strategy has been to focus on the bigger states from the beginning. It's really common knowledge. Admittedly he changed this somewhat midstream during the New Hampshire primary but you should notice that money was spent there very late. If his strategy was to actively look to win New Hampshire then obviously he would have established some ground work very early like the other candidates. The reality remains that from the beginning they have focused on Florida and beyond. It is safe to say that this strategy was well known long before Iowa.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (January 22, 2008 7:21 pm ET)
               

            Saying something is "common knowledge" doesn't make it so, any more than saying something is "common sense" means that it's true.  Nothing in Giuliani's actions from July 2007 to December 2007 indicates that he was planning to skip the early contests.  You can hypothesize all you want about Giuliani's strategy; there's no evidence that it involved skipping the early contests.  Giuliani didnt spend tons of money and time in other parts of the country as part of some "grand plan" for November 2008- he was already the best-known of the candidates, why would he blow his treasury doing that?

            If he planned to start in Florida, it seems to me he would have spent just enough in the early states to remain visible (he spent MUCH more than that) and threw his whole load into Florida. He didn't do that. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by achrispage6992 (January 23, 2008 7:16 am ET)
                 
              Look, this is an issue that I will plead a certain degree of ignorance. What I can tell you is that from paying attention to the process through information garnered from the networks and print media it is common knowledge that this was the Guiliani strategy. I referenced the Cooper piece which tends to back up my assertion. Read the piece and tell me where Cooper is wrong. I would gladly accept becoming more educated about this. You contend the opposite, from what sources do you form your opinion? 
              Report Abuse
    • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (January 22, 2008 6:20 pm ET)
         

      Giuliani didn't "intend" to skip all the states up to Florida.  he campaigned actively in New Hampshire -- in fact, of the Republican candidates, only Romney of next door Massachusetts spent more time in New Hampshire than did Giuliani.  In addition, as a Vermonter who's also in the area reached by northern New Hampshire media, I can say first hand that Giuliani blanketed New Hampshire with TV ads right up until the day he decided to cut his losses and make a last stand in Florida.

      Jjamele is correct -- Giuliani took to the field, found out he wasn't going to win by acclimation, and then ran away yelling that he didn't want to win and wasn't really trying in the first place.  This tactic should be familiar to New Yorkers, who saw it first hand when Giuliani ran for the US Senate in 2000 -- he exited that race with his tail between his legs as soon as he found out the seat wasn't going to be handed to him on a silver platter.

      Giuliani was at the top of national polls until late 2007.  His incredible crash and burn is without parallel in modern presidential politics.  Political Scientists will use the Giuliani debacle for decades as an example of how NOT to run a campaign.

      The media needs to quit pimping Giuliani as a major candidate -- he's finished behind Ron Paul almost everywhere.  Paul is now uninvited from campaign debates on the grounds that he's not a serious candidates -- well, why is Giuliani, the guy finishing BEHIND Paul, considered "serious?"

      Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (January 22, 2008 6:37 pm ET)
           

        You may have a difficult time convincing Michael Cooper of the New York Times of that. The Times article I refer to clearly contradicts your assertions. Perhaps you are right, but I tend to lean towards what is given to me by a journalist who is familiar with the campaign. Read the article.

        Clearly the strategy has been to focus on the bigger states starting with Florida from the beginning. The article addresses the push in New Hampshire as well. The reality is that the Guiliani strategy has been and is common knowledge, to most anyway.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by loonz (January 22, 2008 6:43 pm ET)
             

          You may have a difficult time convincing Michael Cooper of the New York Times of that. The Times article I refer to clearly contradicts your assertions.

          No offense but why should anyone care about Cooper's take on the issue?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by achrispage6992 (January 23, 2008 7:11 am ET)
               
            No offense taken. It just seems to me that Cooper is somewhat more "in the know" as to the internal workings of the campaign then you or me. Therefore I tend to trust his take on this more than JJMELLE's or mine for that matter. As I have indicated earlier, read the article and form you own opinion.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (January 23, 2008 7:39 am ET)
                 
              Your link took me to an article by Joyce Purnick.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by achrispage6992 (January 23, 2008 3:00 pm ET)
                   
                Sorry Brab, I will admit my ineptness with posting links. In any event, if you do a google search of "Giuliani strategy michael cooper" you will find a search result called "Giuliani has decided to zag while the other candidates zig". It basically rebukes all of JJMELLES points.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by easygoer002209 (January 22, 2008 7:51 pm ET)
         

      Rudy can say, and Tommy can agree, that after he loses in Florida, he really wasn't competing there anyway.

      As a matter of fact, when its all said and done...Rudy and Tommy can claim neither ever took this campaign seriously and were merely prepping for 2012.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (January 23, 2008 7:54 am ET)
         

      Chris, you are basically saying "what are you going to believe, this article, or your own eyes?"

      I really think I must have taken crazy pills here.  I'll try one more time:  Rudy Giuliani spent millions of dollars and MONTHS running from New Hampshire to Michigan to Iowa to South Carolina campaigning throughout the fall of 2007. When his poll numbers continued to fall, he pulled out.  Now, based on a newspaper article and the bleating media, you tell me that "Giuliani's intent all along was to skip the early contests."

      This is ridiculous.  I don't need to find some magic document that says "Giuliani intended to compete in the early primaries and caucuses."  I saw the ads and I read the papers.  It actually takes a pretty impressive feat of self-hypnosis IMO to convince anyone to buy the "hey he wasn't competing argument."  It's even more bizarre to argue "he never PLANNED to compete."  Really weird. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (January 23, 2008 9:09 am ET)
         

      GIULLIANI campaigned HARD in New Hampshire. ONLY ROMNEY made more appearances, or spent more money. Hundreds of appearances and millions of dollars in ads, Giulliani could hardly have been campaigning HARDER.

      Sure, Giulliani EXPECTS to win Florida, and his "strategy" is that a win in Florida will catapult him into frontrunner status ... it will do the same for ANY candidate who wins there.

      But, did Giulliani "skip" New Hampshire? Not by any sane or rational interpretation. He campaigned HARD, and he LOST. Lost BAD. Was roundly REJECTED. All his work and all his appearance and all the money he spent did not translate into votes.

      Now, if we are playing semantical GAMES, we could say "for all intents and purposes" he "skipped" New Hampshire, IF we define "intents and purposes" as a favorable vote count and "skipped" to mean he FAILED.

      The MSM continue to prop up Giulliani, simply because they will not give up on ANY CHANCE the GOP might have to be competitive. For a while there, we were told, Fred Thompson was the "conservative savior" who would gain frontrunner status and carry it to the White House. We were told this by, yes, THE MEDIA. Now it's McCain who is the "great white male hope", and will be getting all the great press coverage (while the Dems are portrayed as being mired in mud and "RACE" fighting).

      Ah, but McCain is an unlikely champion for the Rightwing ... most conservatives CAN'T STAND HIM. What to do? Well, MAYBE, just MAYBE, Giulliani (who has been described as "Bush on Steroids," sure to please NeoCons) will pull off his "Florida Strategy", so he can't be written off.

      But to protect his candidacy, his miserable losses in the early primaries IN WHICH HE CAMPAIGNED HARD will have to be played down and excused away.

      And the COMPLIANT MSM is only to happy to rewrite that history. The LYING MEDIA will tell us, hoping to FOOL us, that Giulliani simply "skipped" New Hampshire. THIS IS A BLATANT LIE AND MISINFORMATION FORWARDED WITH THE CLEAR INTENT TO DECEIVE!!!!

      Ah, but it WORKED. Tommy is completely fooled, totally on board with the false narrative and LIES. That's ONE vote for Rudy!!! 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (January 23, 2008 10:02 am ET)
         

      Thank you, Tex.  You said it better than I could.  I'm just amazed at the obliviousness of some of the people on this thread.

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (January 23, 2008 2:54 pm ET)
           
        Your sarcasm is certaintly indicative of your reasoning ability. Again, where is Cooper wrong? He is the one who has spent time with the campaign and talked to the campaign staffers. All you are giving is what you have seen with your own eyes. How many millions did he spend, how many hours did he campaign there, how does that compare to the other candidates. Look at the timeline for his efforts there. When did he start spending these millions? Stop taking this discussion to a personal level or are you capable of that?
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.