O'Reilly ignored Obama's disavowal of award granted to Farrakhan by daughter of Obama's pastor
SUMMARY: Fox News' Bill O'Reilly suggested that Sen. Barack Obama may be "hurt" by the news that a publication founded by Obama's church "gave an award" to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who, O'Reilly said, is "anti-Semitic in his rhetoric and sometimes anti-white or whatever." But O'Reilly did not note that Obama issued a statement "condemn[ing]" Farrakhan's "anti-Semitic statements" and saying of the award: "[I]t is not a decision with which I agree."
On the January 21 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly repeatedly suggested that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) may be "hurt" by the news that Trumpet Newsmagazine, a publication founded by Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ, of which Obama is a member, "gave an award" to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who, O'Reilly said, is "anti-Semitic in his rhetoric and sometimes anti-white or whatever." Yet at no point did O'Reilly mention that Obama recently released a statement disavowing the magazine's decision to honor Farrakhan.
As Media Matters for America has noted, after Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen noted on January 15 that Trumpet had given its 2007 Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award to Farrakhan, the Obama campaign released a statement posted the same day on washingtonpost.com's The Trail blog, which read:
"I decry racism and anti-Semitism in every form and strongly condemn the anti-Semitic statements made by Minister Farrakhan. ... I assume that Trumpet Magazine made its own decision to honor Farrakhan based on his efforts to rehabilitate ex-offenders, but it is not a decision with which I agree."
O'Reilly also asked former Rock the Vote president Jehmu Greene whether Obama would be "hurt" by Wright's reported statement that, according to The New York Times, "the terrorist attacks of 9/11 ... were a consequence of violent American policies." But O'Reilly did not mention that the April 30, 2007, Times article to which he referred quoted Obama distancing himself from Wright's remark:
On the Sunday after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, Mr. Wright said the attacks were a consequence of violent American policies. Four years later he wrote that the attacks had proved that "people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just 'disappeared' as the Great White West went on its merry way of ignoring Black concerns."
Such statements involve "a certain deeply embedded anti-Americanism," said Michael Cromartie, vice president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, a conservative group that studies religious issues and public policy. "A lot of people are going to say to Mr. Obama, are these your views?"
Mr. Obama says they are not.
"The violence of 9/11 was inexcusable and without justification," he said in a recent interview. He was not at Trinity the day Mr. Wright delivered his remarks shortly after the attacks, Mr. Obama said, but "it sounds like he was trying to be provocative."
"Reverend Wright is a child of the 60s, and he often expresses himself in that language of concern with institutional racism and the struggles the African-American community has gone through," Mr. Obama said. "He analyzes public events in the context of race. I tend to look at them through the context of social justice and inequality."
From the January 21 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:
O'REILLY: How would you describe Dr. Wright's church?
HERMENE HARTMAN (N'DIGO magazine founder): It's a middle-class church. It is a superb church. Reverend Wright started a church with 87 people; today, has 8,000 in that particular congregation. United Church of Christ is basically a white denomination.
And I think there's been just a lot of miscasting here. Seventy ministries within the church, to include Girl Scouts, prison outreach, marital counseling, education, children's counseling, a lot of Adopt-A-School. They have done a lot to empower that community and to improve that community.
O'REILLY: OK. But you could make the same argument about Louis Farrakhan, that he's done, you know, some good things, yet you know, he's anti-Semitic in his rhetoric and sometimes anti-white or whatever. And --
HARTMAN: But that is -- that is not Jeremiah Wright.
O'REILLY: No, but it is association there. And the association, you can draw your own conclusion.
Now, I'm going to source all this stuff. In fact, I guess that Dr. Wright's daughter gave an award to Louis Farrakhan, according to The Washington Post. So, I'm going to source a lot of this stuff because I don't believe the mainstream media at all, Miss Greene. I think that they take things out of context all the time and -- particularly when Barack Obama is concerned. But -- so I'll source it and then you can give me your opinion.
This comes from the New York Times, 4/30/2007. Dr. Wright said the attacks on 9-11 were a "consequence of violent American policies." Now, I don't know whether he said that or not. The New York Times is saying he did. Is that going to hurt Barack Obama?
GREENE: Well, Bill, I think you're absolutely right that the media has their hooks out. The honeymoon is over for Senator Obama. He's going to have to start playing on the same stage that Senator Clinton has been doing for the past 12 years, and that means anyone who has advised him, anyone who he has ever done business with, anyone who Michelle Obama has done business with, they are all going to have to stand up to the scrutiny.
And I think, you know, some voters may be looking at that, as far as, we already know everything there is to know about the Clintons and everything they have in their closets. This is a new kid on the block. And, as he's doing well in these early states, the media is really going to take a much closer look at him --
O'REILLY: OK, but you dodged my question here.
GREENE: -- and this is just one example.
O'REILLY: If -- yeah. If The New York Times is reporting that Dr. Wright did say the attacks on 9-11 were the cause of American policy, and he also said, according to The New York Times, same day, that Zionism has an element of white racism.
These are explosive. These are very, very charged. Then you have the award that Dr. Wright's daughter gave to Louis Farrakhan. So, my question to you as a Democratic consultant is, is this going to hurt Senator Obama? Is it?
GREENE: Well, I think there's absolutely the possibility that it's going to hurt Senator Obama. I don't think any campaign staffer at Obama headquarters is happy that they're having to respond to the senator's name being put in the same sentence as Louis Farrakhan over and over and over because of his pastor.
O'REILLY: What do you think, Miss Hartman?
GREENE: And the thing is he really is going to have to answer --
HARTMAN: Well --
GREENE: -- as far as --
O'REILLY: All right. Let me get to Miss Hartman. Do you think it's going to hurt the senator?
HARTMAN: I think with -- I think that's the litmus test. I think whenever there is a black candidate running, the litmus test is Louis Farrakhan. We bring that up, and we -- and that becomes some kind of benchmark, some kind of judgment. And I think a lot of --
GREENE: But there has never been -- there has never been a black candidate like Senator Obama. So --
HARTMAN: That's true.
GREENE: I think it's not just --
HARTMAN: He's under another scrutiny.
GREENE: It's not going to just be this Louis -- it's not going to just be Farrakhan.
HARTMAN: But you --
GREENE: It's going to be everything he has out there. And thank goodness, he --
HARTMAN: I agree. And --
GREEN: -- did write his book and he has been upfront about it, but we're going to have to start taking a much closer look.
O'REILLY: Well, wait, wait, wait. I want to give Ms. Hartman the last word, because she knows the guy.
HARTMAN: But what -- what's the emphasis? I mean, you could also -- you know, it's the twist. It's the turn that's being taken. You could also look at a wonderful sermon that Dr. Wright gave and a book developed out of it, The Audacity of Hope.
O'REILLY: But you can't -- you can't do that, though.
HARTMAN: But we're -- but here's what -- you can do that if you wanted to do that.
O'REILLY: No, no, no, no. Because every despot --
HARTMAN: You could. Here's what -- but Bill --
O'REILLY: -- and I'm not calling the man a despot, but every despot in history has done some good things. Here -- look --
HARTMAN: But he's not a despot. Come on, Bill.
O'REILLY: No, I'm not -- I'm not calling him that.
HARTMAN: That's -- that's out of order.
O'REILLY: I made that clear. But the things that he has --
HARTMAN: Well, what are you saying?
O'REILLY: -- said are very, very troubling. And I think that Senator Obama -- if he's going to continue to associate with the doctor -- and he says he will --
HARTMAN: Obama is a -- is running against a political couple. That is what is going on now. And true enough, obviously he's got to be judged just like everybody else, but you've got to bring the truth. If you're going to do Obama's church, let's do everybody's church.
O'REILLY: All right.















Now I learn, thanks to all these rightwingnutz, that the folks who go to that particular house of worship are directly responsible for all the acts of their spiritual leader!
This, of course, is certainly going to be a bummer for some Catholics and other religious folks who have had the misfortune to see their leader(s) stray...
Where is the tirade against Mitt and how the Mormons were against civil rights and considering black people, you know, human?
Where are the tirades against Huckabee for supporting abortion clinic bombers? Since the good Christians who bombed clinics and shot doctors were of his evangelical tilt.
And so on and so forth. To judge people for something their church did is not fair. Don't you have to judge folks by what they do? And the actual company that they keep? Show me a picture of Obama with Farrakhan, and then I will dress him down for hanging around with him, until then, this should be (but won't be) a nothing story. More noise to distract from the real issues of inept republican leadership.
LOLO,
When will they be dissected similarly? Have they been? Please let me know when and where this is happening. If its happening as dishonestly as it is on the O'Reilly factor, I will protest it too.
If you have video links to show this dissection currently happening, I would appreciate it.
You are responsible for the company that you keep
Then I'd better stay away from family reunions.
You are responsible for the company that you keep. And rest assured that all of the candidates will be silmiarly dissected.
How do you "silmiarly" dissect a person????
LOLO,
I'll also take this opportunity to offer you a wager. Since the Mormon Church and Huckabee's Church (I think he's a Southern Baptist) have had long histories of controversial statements (including some made by Huckabee himself, in your eyes, they deserve scrutiny, correct?
Here is the wager:
If Hannity and O'Reilly (especially O'Reilly) press the issue with Romney and Huck the same way and with the same aggression as they have gone after Obama's church, I will pay you $100, if they don't you owe me only $50, deal?
I realize they have slimed Obama's church a heckuva lot more so far (which gives me a huge head start, hence the odds), but since you said they will be similarly dissected, put your money where your mouth is. To prove your slide, find video clips of Hannity and O'Reilly (especially Mr. Independent) and link them on this site. I will do the same for you unless MMFA already has. Deal?
You are responsible for the company that you keep.
Someone got a link to Bush hanging out with the bin Ladens?
Has anyone else noticed that for at least the past three years O'Reilly has marked MLK Day by bashing whichever black figures are in the news at the time? And how absurd is it for O'Reilly to smear first and THEN say he's "going to source all this stuff" because he doesn't trust the media?
Excellent point Clams. It's really amusing to watch the right wing talking heads scramble aimlessly trying to figure out which of the Democratic candidates to bash. Quite possibly this could be the first time they give equal time to their attacks. I would hazzard a guess that if Obama was in the tank we of course would hear nothing else about his pastor, but alas since he has a chance the feel they must preemptively strike. The Bush Doctrine has far reaching effects, I guess.
Veering a little off topic, if you happen to listen to right wing radio as I do, you will notice how most of them are quietly beginning to support Romney although none of them have the backbone to come right out and say it, just in case Romney loses. It's happenning. They battle lines are being drawn. As for O'Reilly he of course is dong the same old song and dance, hit pieces on the Democratic field and none of the GOP field all the while exclaiming his nuetrality. It makes me sick. Yesterday he actually said on his radio show that the motion picture industry is sinking because of the ability of Americans to be entertained from a vast array of options in the home. Fair enough, but he went on to say that there is only a few televisions shows that have been able to entertain an audience across the board and his show along with American Idol were among them. Ego maniac.
WARNING - MAY LEAD TO EXTENSIVE THOUGHT - DO NOT READ - Let me get this straight, we're supposed to be pissed that O'Reilly didn't mention that Obama issued a statement regarding the "award" honoring Louis Farrakhan, condemning Louis Farrakhan's statements... Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Bill state that Barack MAY be hurt by Obama's "Church", C-H-U-R-C-H!!! Billy didn't say Obama himself spoke kindly of Farrakhan. Let's be honest all, if you are associated with a gang, a church, a "not-for-profit", a club... whatever, and you make THAT club, gang, church group.. and issue in your campaign, that group is subject to scrutiny. Welcome to reality all.
Wow, I CAN'T post an educated response to this blather?!
How rediculous,
My mistake, I thought this was an open debate, I now know after posting an opinion to this post that it must be "reviewed" which means I'll never see it posted. You and your fellow admins appear to be cowards. I suppose it makes sense why you have not progressed beyond the "web-scene" in as many years... Nice web-site though.
I don't recall Obama's pastor running for president. Bill and the rest of the Fox News clowns here have stooped low in attacking ministers and their churches. They are private citizens, not public figures.
The truth is Bill is angry that Obama has snubbed him. Do you think Obama would go on a show that continues to degrade him? If I was Obama, I would never step foot in this crazy studio.
So by O'Reilly's own assertion then, I think others have pointed this out as well, then Bill O'Reilly is DIRECTLY responsible for the child molestation by Catholic priests that have occurred in the US, and other locations around the world simply because he's a Catholic. Right Bill? This is what you're saying when you state that something Obama's church did could hurt him as a Presidential candidate. If you want to paint with a broad brush, you have to paint everything with said same brush, but of course, this isn't true.
Now if Obama was responsible for the award, or maybe suggested that Farrakhan should get said award, this would be a different story, but he didn't, and he didn't agree with the award, so where is the alleged controversy? Isn't it entirely possible that an organization that someone belongs to could do something that they don't agree with? Heck, boil that down to the company that I work for. They do things all the time that I don't agree with, and yet have no power to control. The same holds true for this stupid little nugget that the right wing attack merchants have pooped out.
So by O'Reilly's own assertion then, I think others have pointed this out as well, then Bill O'Reilly is DIRECTLY responsible for the child molestation by Catholic priests that have occurred in the US, and other locations around the world simply because he's a Catholic.
Not only that, Bill O'Reilly needs to be punished for the Spanish Inquisition. And since it figures that SOME of the guards at the Nazi concentration camps were Catholic, he needs to go on trial as a war criminal....
Hannity's been doing the same thing over and over.
All Hannity CAN do is repeat the same thing over and over. He's the media's equivalent to "Rain Man" ("Gotta go to Kmart - go to Kmart....").
Has anyone else noticed that since the Dems are running a woman and a black man for the presidency that the real deep inner thoughts of those of Republican/conservative bent are seeping out in every crevis and crack.
The womanizing words of the pundits
The underhanded racism
At the rate that this is happening, who ever is the Republican candidate, he will suffer the consequences, even if he doesn't agree with what the pundits say....... only the hard core racist/sexist (KKK and hard core bible thumpers come to mind) will be the only ones voting for them
dear mr. oreilly:
good news! the revolution's over, we won! i realize you haven't time to waste actually checking your facts, so we'll continue providing updates. i understand president washington is considering sending federal troops to pennsylvania, to convince those pesky whiskey makers that they should pay the spirits tax.
we'll keep you apprised.
your staff
Not only that, President Adams is about to sign the Treaty of Tripoli, which contains a clause stating that "the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion".
Guess you'll have to go after John Adams and his "War on Christians"....
The drip drip drip of subtle innuendos to slowly damage the Democratic candidate masked as legitimate discussion. This is the method to O’Reilly’s madness. He does the same cheap trick with President Clinton. When O’Reilly has to point out something negative about Bush, he will merge the two by saying something like “Neither Bush nor Clinton did anything about this country’s energy problem”, or “Bush has done nothing about the boarder, the same way Clinton didn’t do anything”. Or my personal favorite; “Both Bush and Clinton believed the Saddam had weapons of mass destruction”.
O’Reilly the attack dog for the GOP has to take a bite out of Obama now, just incase he gets the nomination so that he will come out wounded.
Farrakhan is not only an anti-semite, he is also a woman hater.
A disavowal from Obama is not enough. Without action it is meaningless. He has claimed Wright as his close personal spiritual adviser. He should have left the church with a public statement a long time ago. It is way too late.
Supporters of Obama and people who want to believe in him just aren't facing this scandal. It's not going away and it shouldn't.
I do not want as my president someone who's spiritual adviser is an admirer of Farrakhan. That is abhorrent.