About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

On Hannity & Colmes, Rev. Peterson compared Obama's church to KKK

January 23, 2008 6:55 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: On Hannity & Colmes, Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson said of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago: "If a white preacher, including the KKK, espouses so-called white values -- remember, at one time, the KKK was doing that." During the show, neither Peterson nor Sean Hannity explained how Trinity United Church of Christ in any way reflects the ideology, mission, or history of the KKK.

87 Comments

On the January 22 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson asserted in reference to an award given by Trumpet Newsmagazine, a publication founded by Trinity United Church of Christ, to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan: "Look at [Rev.] Jeremiah Wright [pastor of Trinity], for an example. This guy's daughter gave an award to Louis Farrakhan. Louis Farrakhan is a racist, and we all know it. But because they're black and Democrat, they are allowed to get away with it." Peterson then said: "Jeremiah Wright, for an example. If a white preacher, including the KKK, espouses so-called white values -- remember, at one time, the KKK was doing that." During the show, neither Peterson nor co-host Sean Hannity made any effort to explain Peterson's suggestion that Trinity United Church of Christ in any way reflects the ideology, mission, or history of the KKK, beyond his assertion regarding the KKK: "They were like, 'We're for white people, we're for our folks.' " Hannity and his guests have frequently commented on Wright and Trinity United Church of Christ, the Chicago church of which Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) is a member.

Peterson's comment came after Hannity asserted: "[I]f you're a radio host or a television host and you say something that is deemed inappropriate -- for example, where did any of the people that went after Don Imus -- why didn't they go after Calvin Butts for saying, 'Go to hell, white man'?" Hannity was referring to Dr. Calvin O. Butts III, pastor of the Abyssinian Baptist Church in New York City, who recently endorsed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) for president. According to Butts, a " 'substantial figure' in the business and political life of the city" said to him, "[Y]ou know, most crime is black-on-black crime, and the police have done a lot of good. And we need you now. You're a black leader. We need you to go out there and deal with your people." Butts said that he replied: "Go to hell, white man." Following Hannity's statement, Peterson asserted: "[T]here is a double standard, and white Americans are afraid."

On the March 1, 2007, edition of Hannity & Colmes, Wright told co-host Alan Colmes that Trinity's philosophy does not "assume superiority nor does it assume separatism." Wright stated: "We have no hierarchal arrangement. When you say an African-centered way of thinking -- African-centered philosophy, African-centered theology -- you're talking about one center. We're talking about something that's different, and different does not mean deficient ... nor does it mean superior or inferior." Nevertheless, as Media Matters for America has documented (here, here, and here), Hannity has since repeatedly referred to Wright or Trinity as "separatist" without mentioning Wright's statement that the church's philosophy does not "assume separatism."

Additionally, as Media Matters also documented, on the December 19 edition of Hannity & Colmes, Hannity said to right-wing pundit Ann Coulter: "You know, Barack Obama's pastor ... has this whole list of the Black Value System. It seems like he's supporting a segregated church." During the segment, Hannity provided no evidence to support his suggestion that Trinity is "segregated." According to an April 2, 2007, posting on the website of the Martin Marty Center -- the institute for advanced research in all fields of the study of religion at the University of Chicago Divinity School -- professor emeritus Martin E. Marty wrote of Trinity: "My wife and I on occasion attend, and, like all other non-blacks, are enthusiastically welcomed."

Regarding the award to Farrakhan, on January 15, the Obama campaign released a statement posted the same day on the washingtonpost.com blog The Trail that read:

"I decry racism and anti-Semitism in every form and strongly condemn the anti-Semitic statements made by Minister Farrakhan. ... I assume that Trumpet Magazine made its own decision to honor Farrakhan based on his efforts to rehabilitate ex-offenders, but it is not a decision with which I agree."

Following Peterson's November 29, 2004, appearance on Hannity & Colmes, Media Matters noted that Hannity is a strong supporter of Peterson's and is a member of the advisory board for Peterson's organization, Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny (BOND). On the BOND website, Hannity is quoted saying that organization "continues to fight the good fight standing for the values of God, family, and country, and are deserving of our support." Hannity has acknowledged his ties to Peterson and BOND in the past, but did not do so during Peterson's January 22 appearance.

From the January 22 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:

HANNITY: Reverend [Al] Sharpton has made multiple statements over the course of his career that have been over the top and out of line. [Rev.] Jesse Jackson has. Louis Farrakhan is an outright racist and anti-Semite, based on the things he's said over the years, as far as I'm concerned. Democrats can have Robert Byrd [WV] as their -- as a leader in the Senate.

PETERSON: That's right.

HANNITY: Why does the double standard exist? How do you change that?

PETERSON: Well, good point. Good question. The reason that the double standard exists is because white Americans are afraid. They are afraid of being called a racist. And any time you are afraid, your enemy will overtake you. And it's never going to change. And I've given white folks permission to start speaking up. I'm a black American. I love my country. I love what's right. And I know that it's only the truth that's going to bring on a change. And until that happens, it's going to continue.

HANNITY: But you see, if you're a radio host or a television host and you say something that is deemed inappropriate -- for example, where did any of the people that went after Don Imus -- why didn't they go after Calvin Butts for saying, "Go to hell, white man"?

PETERSON: That's right. Because he's black. I'm telling you, because he's black, and there is a double standard, and white Americans are afraid. Look at Jeremiah Wright, for an example. This guy's daughter gave an award to --

HANNITY: Farrakhan.

PETERSON: -- to Louis Farrakhan. Louis Farrakhan is a racist, and we all know it. But because they're black and Democrat, they're allowed to get away with it. If -- and Jeremiah Wright, for an example. If a white preacher, including the KKK, espouses so-called white values -- remember, at one time, the KKK was doing that.

HANNITY: Yeah.

PETERSON: They were like, "We're for white people, we're for our folks." [unintelligible]

HANNITY: David Duke [unintelligible]

PETERSON: They got rid of those folks. But when it happened with black Democrats, they're allowed to do it.

HANNITY: Do you think -- how could you have that in your heart, those words, "Go to hell, white man," if you don't have racial antipathy?

PETERSON: That's what it's all about. They hate white Americans. They are racist toward white Americans, no thanks to the so-called civil rights leaders. You know, we just celebrated Dr. King's birthday last night.

HANNITY: Well, we were there at the same meeting.

PETERSON: Yeah, it was fun. Great speech, by the way.

HANNITY: Thank you.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by snoopy (January 23, 2008 7:01 pm ET)
         

      "If a white preacher, including the KKK, espouses so-called white values -- remember, at one time, the KKK was doing that."

      Uhhh, when did they stop doing that?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MoonbatYouBet (January 23, 2008 7:02 pm ET)
         

      The Klan MURDERED people!

      That alone would seem to differentiate the Trinity Church from the KKK in the same way that being underwater differentiates the ocean from the land.

      But here's the tricky question I have after seeing this-  Are they trying to attack the church and Obama through it in an extrememly exaggerated and false way or are they trying to soften the image of the Klan? 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Wes1 (January 23, 2008 7:15 pm ET)
           

        Unfortunately, that's a good question since this is F-News and we know what their viewer demographic is.  How sad that there are still people out there who long for segregation and think inter-racial marriage is an abomination. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dbeden4153 (January 24, 2008 10:40 am ET)
             
          I know, it is sad....right Fin?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by finarfin (January 24, 2008 10:55 am ET)
             
          Well, inter racial mairrages are indeed an abomination, and equal segregation would be beneficial for all parties involved.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jawill11 (January 24, 2008 11:23 am ET)
               
            Fin, I knew you would step up to the plate on this topic to show us, yet again, how much of a steaming pile of excriment you are. 
            Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (January 24, 2008 11:27 am ET)
               
            Oh joy. More racial ranting from the one celled wonder. Don't burn out a synapse on that, you can't afford to.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by dbeden4153 (January 24, 2008 12:02 pm ET)
                 

              Oh yeah, who called it...btw, my fiancee's step-sister is in an inter-racial marriage, and everyone in their family seems fine with it, even though they all are from the rural south.  It gives me hope that Fin's way of thinking may come to an end soon...

              Report Abuse
              • Author by achrispage6992 (January 24, 2008 12:41 pm ET)
                   
                It's obvious that this guy is baiting ya'll. You fuel his flames by responding. Marginalize him by ignoring ignorance.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by snoopy (January 24, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
                     
                  But I like toying with the beaver. I'm like a cat playing with a mouse...
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by finarfin (January 25, 2008 2:52 pm ET)
                   
                Actually Dbeden, because of the injustices incurred on the white man by the radical left, you may see a resurgence of white nationalism. I certainly do.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by solon (January 26, 2008 3:06 am ET)
                     
                  You are delusional beyond belief. Your racism is disgusting. The days racist tripe is acceptable are long gone. The damage done to AMERICA by far right morons has doomed the far right to insignificance. Wake up and smell the reality.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (January 24, 2008 12:25 pm ET)
               

            "Well, inter racial mairrages are indeed an abomination, and equal segregation would be beneficial for all parties involved."---Fin.

            Fin,

            Why do you choose to live in the United States if you feel this way?  what are your thoughts about two different ethnicities of Eurpoeans marrying?  Are you 100% sure of your own heritage?  The one compliment I can give you is that I appreciate your candor.  Earlier you were trying to soften your stance on things and say you weren't a racist, but lately you have been more honest.  At least we know where you stand.

            Since you are here as an American citizen now, how do you about the soldiers of various races who have fought for YOUR freedoms?  My main question though is why do you live in a place that is so diverse?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by finarfin (January 25, 2008 5:59 pm ET)
                 

              Dbeden, You seem to believe that i feel so strongly about this point i would move from the country of my home if conditions where not ideal. If this was so, i wouldn't be living in the U.S, or even in the liberal California for that matter. Sorry, but the "if you don't like it then leave" saying is not applicable to such a matter. Also America is still a fairly conservative country compared to our European counterparts. There is also greater possibility in America, in all ways.

              If a German marries a Dutch, or an Irish a Scott I could care less, there is no chance in the greatly interconnected world of today that this not happen. Whites marrying whites does not bother me because they have relatively much more similar genetic material.

              My heritage i am not sure of, seeing as my ancestors where not too keen on records of the sort, but i can approximate that i am nearly homogeneous.

              Well, i tried to soften things up to those here who find it difficult to accept that there are many with white nationalistic feeling such as I. Actually, i do not think of myself as racist. personally, a racist to me is someone who hates another race because of their difference, I just do not find hate towards other races in me. I find it as easy to socialize and make friends with one race as with any other, provided we share interests. This is why i think that the word should be redefined, or dis-burdened of its negative connotation. For there are liberals i know, who like me believe that for whatever reason the black race is on average lower in intellectual performance levels than whites or Asians. Does this make them supremacists? technically it does, and so even if such a thing where proved, it would be denied by society. For it is similar to the reluctance of people to accept that the earth was round, even though there was evidence that it indeed was. So will (and has, in the case of Dr. Watson) society rejected the thought that any ethnic group should be superior in certain areas than others, even when the evidence shows this to be a legitimate analysis.

              About soldiers of different races who fought for my freedoms, well good for them, I have  nothing against them and i thank them. To me the varying performance among races is a fact of life that does not stop me from living. My parents emigrated [legally] to this country for greater economic opportunity and a better life, and so here I've stayed.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by dbeden4153 (January 24, 2008 12:38 pm ET)
               

            Oh, and I would love to hear your explanation of how segregation would be beneficial for all parties.

             

            I guess Bush wouldn't have Condi to trot out every time he needs a good lie.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by finarfin (January 25, 2008 6:45 pm ET)
                 

              Oh, and I would love to hear your explanation of how segregation would be beneficial for all parties.

              Well, basically whites and more importantly, blacks tend to perform better in a segregated society. The type of segregation i suggest is NOT that of pre M.L.K. days. Rather this "contemporary segregation" of mine would have opportunities for blacks to go to all black schools, and live in all black neighborhoods. This segregation is really only in the fields of education and community. Blacks would perform better as they would no longer trying to not do what the "white man" does, they would develop a unique yet not self-degenerating identity and culture. This sort of segregation is more of a 'quasi-segregation' and the treatment of both segregated parties would be equal. This proposal i understand is not probable, and i put it forth as only a proposal, nothing more, nothing less.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by kromecom48 (January 24, 2008 12:42 pm ET)
               
            Swedish Chef, thank you for the enlightening post. You are the soft, slimy underbelly representing racists and bigots of all colors, ethnicities and creeds in this otherwise wonderful country. We need you and your ilk to post regularly so that we never again lapse into complacency about the dark forces that retreat into the shadows only to rear their hideous visages at opportune moments. Discord and acrimony fill your black heart and you'll reap what you sow. Have a beautiful and blessed day.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by finarfin (January 25, 2008 6:15 pm ET)
                 

              "Swedish Chef"???

              I'm glad to perform this service for you, it seems as if you would find it distasteful. "discord" and "acrimony"? Actually, i do not find this in my heart, rather i feel clean of conscience and happy to be alive. this is a common misconception, people seem to think i am some git consumed with hate. But really, my personality is not a hateful one, i must admit i am magnanimous of character.

              One shall not reap the fruit of hate if one does not have the seed to sow. the day IS beautiful and my day is surely blessed.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (January 24, 2008 4:17 pm ET)
               

            Seperate water fountains means shorter lines for everyone, huh?

            d!psh!t.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (January 26, 2008 3:03 am ET)
               
            It is only an abomination to sick, twisted, bigots and white Supremists. YOUR illness does not define reality.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (January 23, 2008 7:04 pm ET)
         

      Here we go again with someone throwing out KKK against a black-ish (I say black-ish because there are white congregants there as well) church and trying to tie it in with Farrakhan, the new talking point apparently for Obama and all.

      Forgive me if I'm wrong here, but this guy is saying that because they're black they're allowed to be racist? How many times over the years have we heard the charge of Farrakhan being anti-semitic (which isn't racism actually, because being Jewish is a religion, not an entire race of people right?)? I mean, they're not "getting away with it".

      Report Abuse
      • Author by atheist (January 23, 2008 7:17 pm ET)
           

        See my post below regarding the KKK reference.

        On the racist issue, I do think Peterson is saying that blacks get away with a lot of statements and actions that whites wouldn't.  We wouldn't tolerate a white group promoting "white values" (whatever those might be !), so why do we tolerate a black group promoting "black values" ?  Guilt, perhaps ?  That's my personal reason !  There's a term for it, I can't remember what it is.  Remember when OJ was found not guilty and in general the black community celebrated this result ?  I thought he was guilty as hell but I understood the black response, because for so many many many years blacks have been discriminated against in the legal system (I believe it still happens, and frequently, but perhaps more due to income than outright racism), so a mistake in favor of a black defendant seems  acceptable, so many more would be necessary to make up for past wrongs.     

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Preston (January 23, 2008 7:33 pm ET)
             

          Remember when OJ was found not guilty and in general the black community celebrated this result ?

          I wasn't celebrating when OJ was found guilty and I'm part of "the black community," so I think it's a big stretch for you to generally say that's how black people reacted based on what you saw on television.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Clevenative (January 23, 2008 8:05 pm ET)
               

            Sorry to say, Preston – but for 90% of white America, ALL they know about black people is what they see on television and the bigoted stereotypes passed down through the generations or from their peers. Most of us don't admit it to ourselves, what's more publicly.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by atheist (January 23, 2008 8:20 pm ET)
                 
              Is that true ?  I don't know.  I live in Chicago.  I don't live in a white suburb, I'm in the city in a very diverse area.  I don't have to watch TV to see blacks.  :-)   But I don't know how the population o the U.S. is distributed, are the majority of whites in  predominantly white areas ?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Preston (January 23, 2008 8:22 pm ET)
                 

              You may be right on that. I think that's based on the fact we still live in a segregated America. And it doesn’t help matters the only diversity you see of blacks is through a subculture such as Hip Hop (not bashing Hip Hop or anything since I am a fan, but today’s Hip Hop has become so commercialized, shallow and sensationalistic, you get no nuance of black experience in America), with Hip Hop being represented as the sole culture of African-Americans when it's not. It's a urban youth subculture that has its roots in New York. At least with whites there’s so much diversity of personalities and character in our media that it would be silly to say that whites are monolithic. I mean, how can one view whites as monolithic when there’s Wasps, the Irish, Italians, Jews, Swedes, Germans, etc., that all have different cultural heritages they bring to the melting pot?

              This is why I have this empathy for some white people. When I hear some of them say certain stereotypic things, I try to compose myself and not get so upset, because a lot of times, they can't help it. When all they know of black people are the one-dimensional images they see of black people, or the bad, isolated encounters they have with blacks on a personal level, then it's understandable why some have a hard time understanding black individuality.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Lynn (January 23, 2008 9:50 pm ET)
                   
                Very well stated as usual. I haven't liked the turn these Democrat debates have taken with this gender vs. race issues but it has been interesting. I've been in different chat rooms all over the internet with what I assume are White females telling me that sexism is far worse than racism, and at times these newly articulated race views coming from professed Liberals borders a little in wing nutty land.  It is my belief that all of the isms are bad and bad for the country. Nevertheless I'm finding it very interesting and at times disappointing. I remember my buddy Tommy in chorus with some of the Liberal male posters here a few threads back saying that the B word was no worse than the N word and my response was that I found them equally offensive because both were generally used in a context intended to demean and marginalized.  As a female of color I've had the unique experience or a better way to say it is that I’ve had the misfortune of having at times in my life to deal with either racism or sexism and sometimes deal with them simultaneously, so I'm sad to see this Obama Clinton fight taking this unfortunate detour into the women vs. the Blacks and whose pain is greater. Being marginalized and disrespected is bad regardless of the reason that it is being done. This racism vs. sexism debates is divisive and it was my assumption that divisive politicking was the domain of the other side. Maybe I've been given my "peeps" too much credit. I do know this, if this doesn’t stop it’s going to have long-term repercussions and the Dems are going to end up looking like the hypocritical wing nuts that I so badly want out of office, and OMG I wish Bill Clinton would shut up!  The DNC might want to get involved here and calm this brewing storm before some damage takes place that is long lasting. Maybe I’ll send them an e-mail advising them to do so.   
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Preston (January 23, 2008 10:34 pm ET)
                     

                  What's up, Lynn! Always good to see you.

                  Now you know how I feel about Obama. I'm not really a fan of his because I think his platform is too timid and accommodating to corporate power. But I have to say, when I watched that debate on Monday, for some odd reason, I felt this strong urge to align myself behind him and become his supporter. Even when I read racist attacks against him – the subtle and not so subtle ones -- though I'm not a fan of Obama's triangulating, I can't help but feel this urge to rally behind him. Perhaps this is the legacy that our history as black people brought to us. When we see one of our own attacked in a vicious, racist fashion, an alert goes off inside of us to come to their rescue. This has always been our way to survive in this country, it’s all part of the Black Diaspora.

                  I have to agree with Pearl who said a week ago that if the Dems don't straighten this messy identity politics game out in this campaign season, we will see a President Romney or McCain in office. The media doesn't help matters, either. You have idiots such as Tucker Carlson race-baiting by saying because Clinton received more Hispanic votes than Obama, there's a racial divide and hatred between the two ethnic groups. (Which is funny because based on the studies I've read, the past California mayors who were black and Latino both received a huge portion of the black and Latino vote respectively. But don't allow this to stop Tucker Carlson in his attempt to drive a bigger wedge between the Democrats. He'll use the gang violence between the two groups as a premise that there's animosity between decent, hard-working, black and brown folks.)

                  Maybe it's me but when Clinton used the words "slum lords" and "inner cities" in her attack against Obama, I felt she was covertly trying to paint him as some sellout who doesn't have his people -- i.e., black folks -- best interests at heart. She seemed to signal to black voters that while Obama is black, he doesn't care for his people, particuarly those at the bottom. He's basically using his race to earn your vote, but he'll stab you in the back once he's in office. What solidified that for me was when she mentioned statistics of the income growth of blacks during the Clinton era and the Bush era. I never thought I'd agree with some of the conservative posters here, but after watching that debate Monday, I can see how many of them felt that Clinton painted Obama as the "black presidential candidate" with some of her shrewd remarks regarding Martin Luther King. I didn't notice it until that debate, and I vowed to myself if she's the nominee, I'm going to sit it out. I'm not a fan of the Clintons anyway, but this campaign season has turned me off from voting. Maybe I'll change my mind, but I doubt it.

                  I don't deny that Hillary Clinton has received many sexist attacks. But the Clintons tactics have convinced me, for the last time, that they're just as slimy as any Republican. At least the Republicans are more overt with their messages than the Clintons. The Clintons are passive aggressive with their attacks and then when confronted they play innocent. This is why so many people dislike them because they often hide things a knife behind their back while grinning and charming you, working in their seduction. Because of their greed and ambition, they have turned many voters -- those who can't even stand them but would have voted for them anyway because a Republican in office would be distrarous for this country -- completely off from supporting them.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by foxx (January 24, 2008 1:08 am ET)
                       

                    Part of the problem Clinton has is that any criticism of Obama is seen by many as racist.

                    I don't know what she was implying, and all the details of the Rezko connection have not come out, but if in fact Obama was representing and sponsoring and benefitting from financial deals with someone who is now under indictment as a slumlord, while at the same time lauding his own community organizing in this same community, then it is not racist to say so.

                    And Obama's campaign has not implied, they have directly said, not in passing but as prominent attacks, that Clinton does not care about blacks and Katrina or hispanics. Obama has never disavowed or apologized for this.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (January 24, 2008 5:58 pm ET)
                         

                      Part of the problem Clinton has is that any criticism of Obama is seen by many as racist.

                      The Clintons are not seen as racist but their tactics are at least race baiting. They have nothing on Republicans in this regard but I must say watching them use race has surprised the hell outta me.

                      My example lies in the surrogates they use when trying to reach out to black voters. Andrew Young who is supporting the Clintons comes out as says “Bill Clinton is just as black as Obama”. My take is Andrew Young, who earned respect through the civil rights movement, has announce to black voters that hey if your voting for Obama cause he’s black then you can vote for Bill and Hillary cause Bill’s just as black as Obama. That’s insulting to both Obama and black voters. Is he assuming that the only thing black voters care about is color? Black voters don’t have the same economic and national security concerns like white voters? Another surrogate, Robert Johnson founder of BET. He stands on stage to introduce Hillary and insinuates that Obama was dealing drugs, knowing that it’s not true. Of course the same day he made those remarks Hillary’s campaign issues a statement saying Johnson was referring to Obama’s time as a community. Bull Sh*t and you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out what Johnson meant. Of course he had to apologize again because nobody bought his or Hillary’s crap. Obama has ran his campaign leaving race out of it. He talks about ONE America, no red/blue, no black/white. Hillary and Bill, scared after losing Iowa and fearful of losing New Hampshire started this crap about race. As president, Bill has no business playing attack dog for his wife in the primaries. He should NOT be attacking fellow Democrats. They want to win and they don’t give a damn how they go about it but they will regret what they’ve done come November 2008. I for one have a long memory. 

                      Report Abuse
                  • Author by foxx (January 24, 2008 1:56 am ET)
                       

                    Not to mention that her remarks were in response to his criticizing her for being on the board of WalMart while he was community organizing. A challenging response to that is completely fair.

                    And Obama brought up King, Clinton's remarks were in response to that too!!

                    Why do you think bringing up income statistics is slimy politics? I don't understand.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Preston (January 24, 2008 2:45 pm ET)
                         

                      Fox, the point I'm making is that she cited those stats after the fact she try to paint Obama as an opportunist who had dealings with a slumlord in the inner cities. Perhaps I'm making a stretch but it appeared she was signaling to black voters that Obama is a fraud who doesn't care for his people at the bottom, vote for me, someone who had your back in the 90s.

                      And I didn't call The Clintons racist. I don't think attacks against Obama made by Hillary Clinton are racist. People who know my history posting here will tell you that I'm not a fan of Obama's. I've been very critical of him. It just seemed too calculating to me the way she setup her statements regarding wealth among African-Americans during the 90s. But, hey, it's probably just me. :)

                      Report Abuse
                • Author by Clevenative (January 24, 2008 5:52 am ET)
                     

                  LYNN: For many people, the use of either the “b” or “n” word is not meant as a racial or sexual slur – but rather a comment on someone’s actions or state of mind. However, the more I hear women such as you complain about the use of the “b” word (which I use on as many men as I do women), the more conscious I am of how it might be taken by a woman as a sexist , and the harder I try to remove it from my vocabulary. It took me years to do the same for the “n” word, but I did - and for much the same reason.

                  I remember a few years ago watching TV with my nephew and hearing him say “that is so gay”, and took offense – as by the tone of his voice, I knew he meant it in a derogative way. In reality I KNOW my nephew is not a homophobe. It took me a while to realize that with the current generation, that term has been used to describe anything that is not (to use a word of my generation) “hip”.

                  Not to sound like a conservative Republican, but sometimes I wonder if the “political correctness” thing hasn’t gotten a bit out of hand? Or is it that we have subconsciously been indoctrinated to accept such words as “OK” simply because of the frequency of use by many Americans in common dialect? And if so, is this a result of a conscious right wing brainwashing (by their insistence that the word(s) is not necessarily racist or sexist) – which I now realize is the attitude that I seem to “buy into”? I know I’m arguing in circles here, but honestly, I am confused.

                  Report Abuse
          • Author by atheist (January 23, 2008 8:19 pm ET)
               

            Yah, I should not have said "black community".  I should have said "what I saw".

            Anyway, getting past my gaffe ... what I'm thinking is that we tolerate statements and actions of blacks that we do not tolerate of whites because we feel guilty about past injustices.  (There are present injustices, but I think the vast majority of guilt comes from the past injustices which were by far the most egregious.)

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Preston (January 23, 2008 8:34 pm ET)
                 

              Well, I don't deny that white guilt may come into play when excusing some blacks for inexcusable behavior. Me, personally, I don't excuse bigoted behavior from people of my race because I feel that we should know better based on our history in this country. We should have the ability to put ourselves in others shoes and see things from their perspective. But I don't allow a few ignorant people of my race to paint us all bad with a broad brush. Farrakhan may hold a small following among some blacks, but his anti-Semitism is unacceptable to me, especially since I'm in a relationship with someone that's Jewish.

              I grew up in Arkansas for most of my childhood, and let me tell you, I've experienced a lot of racism there, but I also became friends with many whites from that area, too. I guess when one thoroughly understand the history of this country then one has the ability to empathize with those of the opposite race since we're all just victims of history.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by atheist (January 23, 2008 8:49 pm ET)
                   
                OK, not "guilt" per se then.  Empathy.  And perhaps the realization that the pendulum has to swing a few times before it settles.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by August Heat (January 23, 2008 10:51 pm ET)
             
          I agree with some of your points Atheist, but how is murder similar to being pro black or white?  How about arson and other heinous acts?  Like a said, I understand some of your points, but thats a strong and very negative comparison for a church.  Don't you think?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by The Union Forever (January 23, 2008 11:38 pm ET)
           

        Magnolia: "being Jewish is a religion, not an entire race of people right?)?"

         I just wanted to point out that being a Jew is not just a religion, but also an ethnicity. After all, there are many secular Jews in the world, and a large population of them in the USA. Also, Arabs are considered to be also semites, so anti-semitism also applies to anti-Arab sentiments.

        Wikipedia has two very good articles concerning this matters, in case anyone is interested in learning more:

         

         http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semite

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jew

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by atheist (January 23, 2008 7:09 pm ET)
         

      I think this is another improper MMFA article.  I don't think Peterson was saying that Trinity Church is equivalent to the KKK.  I think Peterson was just using the KKK as an example of a white organization that promotes so-called white values (which fortunately most whites don't agree with !).

      I think Peterson has a point.  I was listening to Jess Jackson's daughter's radio show yesterday here in Chicago, and a black female Obama supporter said that blacks need to band together and create a "national black agenda".  What does this mean ?  What would happen if a group of whites said the same thing ? 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (January 23, 2008 7:16 pm ET)
           
        What would happen if a group of whites said the same thing ?

        They'd be called The Republican party.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by atheist (January 23, 2008 7:19 pm ET)
             
          LOL !  Well, the don't actually come out and state it, they do it indirectly.  It is pretty amazing that they have ZERO blacks in Congress.  All of the blacks in Congress are Dems.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Wes1 (January 23, 2008 7:19 pm ET)
           
        It's not a double standard if only one of the races were slaves or discriminated against for so long.  I would say the "black agenda" should be equal justice for people of color (prison terms), and focusing on poverty, education, and parenting.  It's not a radical concept.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Preston (January 23, 2008 7:29 pm ET)
           

        Atheist, I suggest you learn more about Jesse Lee Peterson before you go and defend him. He has a long history of spewing some of the most hate-filled remarks I've heard in years. This is not the first time he compared a black institution to the KKK. And, yes, he's a self-hating, money-grubbing, minstrel for the Republican Party. He deserves no respect, at all, and that's putting it lightly.

        Furthermore, a "black agenda" means self-empowerment. You know, the whole "personal responsibility" meme that the Right often uses in reference to blacks on how more of them should pull themselves up by their bootstraps and work hard for success, rather than depend on the government for handouts and "whine" about racism. It means to organize and revitalize inner cities that are suffering from poor infrastructures. Granted, at the beginning of the Black Power Movement, many activists decided to split ways with their white counterparts because they -- the black activists -- mostly felt it was THEIR movement and having whites involved in the movement gave this notion that it was whites who pulled the strings, with blacks following the orders, rather than a interracial coalition that strategize together. But a "black agenda" does not ostracize whites who want to pitch in and help the cause of poor blacks in the inner cities today. In fact, historically, Blacks and Jews often worked together in terms of civil rights and fulfilling a "black agenda" so its not being nationalistic in a Farrakhan sort of way.

        Believe it or not, we still live in a very segregated America, so there's no "double standard" in terms of someone saying activists need to band together for a black agenda.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Clevenative (January 23, 2008 8:12 pm ET)
             
          I enjoy reading your posts, Preston. I'd rather read someone's first-hand knowledge than the standard canned "talking points" responses that are so frequently given here - and I'm just as guilty of this as anyone sometimes.:)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Preston (January 23, 2008 8:40 pm ET)
               
            Clevenative, thanks for the kind words. I do appreciate that. Some will say that I preach too much to whites who post here (*cough, Chris, cough*), but I post here because I enjoy the dialogue with many posters here. Even those who I disagree with politically (e.g., Tommy, Jeter, Bruce, Wesley, AnotherAmerican, etc.). I appreciate that I'm not at least turning some folks off here with some of my opinions. :)
            Report Abuse
        • Author by atheist (January 23, 2008 8:47 pm ET)
             

          OK Preston, I understand all that you have said.  But I wonder if the continued focus on victimization (Trinity Church) and "black agenda" or "black values" is creating more of a problem, because I believe it condones the hatred of whites.  I have witnessed and even personally experienced this hatred.

           Here's an example so you can judge for yourself ... a couple of years ago in an apartment building where I lived, I complained about the club-level stereo volume coming from another apartment.  I had no idea who lived there.  An older black woman witnessed me complaining to the security desk.  I had no idea she had anything to do with the offending apartment.  Later, I got into an elevator with that woman and a young black woman.  The older woman told the younger woman "That's the girl who complained", and next thing I know this young woman was literally up in my face, arms flying, fingers pointing, "YOU WHITE B*TCH !!".  She went on and on about how I had complained about the stereo because she is black !!!  I thought she was going to hit me.  What I found really strange was that this woman apparently had a hell of a lot more money than I do, I was living in a small one bedroom and she was in a luxurious 3 bedroom penthouse suite.  If she's successful, why is she still stuck in this victim mode ?

          Another example: Driving through a tricky intersection, I was behind a person who apparently didn't understand where to go and stopped in such a way that I was stuck in the middle of the intersection just as the lights were changing.  I honked, got no movement out of the person, so I drove around.  I had no idea who was driving, it was dark out.  Down the bliock I was stopped by a light.  The person I had honked at and driven around pulled up beside me, rolled down her window, and started screaing.  blah blah blah "WHITE B*TCH" blah blah blah "WHITE B*TCH" blah blah blah,  I couldn't hear the entire rant because my window was rolled up.  I must have looked like a deer caught in the headlights.  All I could do was stare, and then I noticed that the light turned green and I drove off.  This totally innocuous triviality was turned into a racial incident.

          I could provide more examples, but I'll stop here.

          When I listened to Jesse Jackson's daughter's radio show, I surprised by the number of callers who complained about whites.

          I have a hard time dealing with this.  I routinely vote for black candidates, I am genuinely happy to see blacks in positions of power or positions of financial success.  As a music lover I have always been a huge fan of the innovations of blacks ... jazz, blues, R&B, rap.  I feel horrible about the injustices of the past, to the point of tears when I think about it, and I'm ashamed that white racists still exist.  I'm getting sick of being treated like I'm the enemy just because I"m white.  It's like reverse racism !  I think phrases like "black agenda" and "black values" promote this type of racism.

          What do you think ? 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (January 23, 2008 9:36 pm ET)
               

            Atheist,

            While you're waiting for Preston to reply I'd like to add my 2 cents.

            Just like there are still White racists among us who would get into an African-American's face in an elevator, or scream racial epithets at a Black driver in a traffic mishap, it's simply gonna happen in reverse sometimes. Ok, that's too simplistic I know.

            I'm sure there are angry people of both races. Blacks who still feel put upon by Whitey. Whites who resent Blacks & probably wish there had never been a Civil Rights movement.

            I was born & raised in a lily-White suburb. And I reside in a nearly lily-White suburb so I'm not exactly an expert on this subject. All I can tell you is my personal, though limited, one on one relationships with Blacks has been positive.

            We know there are individuals out there, on radio & TV that still fuel hatred between the races. And we are seeing a very divisive primary campaign that has sadly been infested with allegations of racism & race-baiting. There are agendas on both sides I'm afraid. Just when one starts to think we've come so very far in 40 years, we realize we still have a long way to go.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Preston (January 23, 2008 9:45 pm ET)
               

            Atheist, I'm sorry to hear that you experienced such vicious attacks like that. I don't dare excuse that type of behavior at all and it's a shame you'd have to hear nasty remarks such as "white b**ch" over a situation that's non-racial.

            This is why I say I do feel sorry for certain white people because if many of the blacks you encountered are those who fit the talk-to-the-hand-I-can't-stand-you-white-people stereotype, and all you see in the media is cartoon images of black people, of course, based on that framework, you'll start to think that the majority of black people act this way. It's in our "culture" what many analysts will say.

            But I will say that I can probably give you many stories where I've experienced racism, some where it’s reminiscent of Jim Crow era. I don't say this to you to make you feel guilty as a white person or sorry for me, because despite what conservatives say that blacks enjoy "playing the victim," we speak about racism because racism effects us a lot deeper than when a black bigot calls someone a "white b**ch." And when I say deeper, I'm referring to white supremacy that has its roots in colonialism. Black bigotry does not segregate black people and place them as second-class citizens as white supremacy. This is not to excuse blacks who are bigots towards whites; I'm just suggesting that black bigotry does not hold the same institutional weight and historical relevance as white supremacy. It was/is white supremacy that controls the judicial, legislative and executive branches, where in the pass made slavery and Jim Crow legal.

            I believe you're making a mistake to connect the personal experience you had with certain black bigots to those who promote a "black agenda." A "black agenda" is not some type of Nazi underground movement where preachers are breeding black Christians to gain power and oppress whites because of slavery. A black agenda means to attack systemic racism and economic disparities head on while also encouraging moral behavior within poor communities. This was the centerpiece of the Civil Rights Movement.

            But please don't take isolated incidents and feel threatened that blacks are secretly planning to oppress white people. Most blacks do not hate white people, we just tend to get frustrated when some refuse to understand our experience and dismiss our complaints as "playing the victim." Again, I've experienced racism from a lot of whites -- so much, I'll probably lose count. However, I'm also friends with many whites who are radically different than the racists I've encountered in the South. In fact, I'm in a relationship with a white guy (though he tends to say technically he's not white because he's Jewish; I tell him he's still white). Our experience with white people in this country has always been based on how we distinguish the racists from the non-racists because our life depended on it. But just because all of us aren't smiling and understanding doesn't make us demons.

            A black agenda is not a negative but a positive. And all the pasts successful black agendas in this country have often succeeded because of a coalition with white liberals. Remember, the NAACP was started by blacks and Jews; the Civil Rights Movement was a strong coalition with white liberals and black activists. And even today some of the best scholarship regarding poverty and inequality in black neighorhoods are often done by white scholars. They're are much a part of a black agenda as black activists.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Clevenative (January 23, 2008 10:37 pm ET)
                 

              As a gay man, every time I see the term "black agenda" - all I can think of is "gay agenda". As if we are some powerful underground movement and have some sort of convention every few years to draw up our plans on how we can recruit the youth and ruin the institution of marriage! LOL

              As silly as it sounds, there are plenty of wingnuts out there who think my joke is fact - and their hate mongering and scare tactics cost my party the last election. I will never let that dead dog lie.

              These same psychopaths will be picketing the funeral of Heath Ledger next week simply because he played a gay man in Brokerback Mountain. Nobody said these people are sane - and I can relate to the type of hate mongering African-Americans must experience because of people of their ilk.

              As a child of the 60's... Fight The Power!

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Preston (January 23, 2008 11:17 pm ET)
                   

                Oh my God, Clevenative, you're gay too! Wow, now I don't feel so alone because some many of my peeps posts here! LOL.

                I totally agree with your post, by the way. Well said! I tend to have difficulty because being gay is not easy around some black folks, and being black is not easy around some whites. So I have to balance between not being "too-ethnic" or "too-gay" around certain groups. Some sociologists call this "code-switching." It can get tiresome at times, but hey, that's the way of life, for now. (I often try to remind my militant black brothers and sisters who often get angry when I suggest the plight of gays are simliar to blacks, that many gays left GREAT significance on the Civil Rights Movement, Bayard Rustin and James Baldwin being chief among them. Some black folks try to ignore homosexuality because they think by ignoring it, homosexuality will somehow go away, like a symptom.)

                So you're definitely correct when you say the black agenda is the same as the gay agenda. Oh, and the whole Heath Ledger story is just tragic. When I first heard of the story yesterday I was very hurt. It was so unexpected! And, man, was he an incredible actor (not to mention fine as hell, too!) I heard the Phelps are going to protest his funeral. They did the same thing at Corretta Scott King's funeral.

                I still can’t believe that back in the day Phelps was a Civil Rights attorney! I can’t wrap my head around that for some reason.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Clevenative (January 24, 2008 6:16 am ET)
                     

                  Thanks. So I guess we are “brothers”, in more ways than one! I suppose the next thing I’ll find out is that I “tricked” with you in the bathhouse, public restroom, or backroom of a gay bar.:)

                  Disclaimer: (less BillO is reading this) This is self-deprecating humor - I don’t indulge in casual sex with strangers.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Lynn (January 24, 2008 1:44 pm ET)
                       
                    Cleve you and Preston are going to have to stop clustering or I'll report you both to Billy O. and Mike Savage.:)
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Preston (January 24, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
                         
                      Hey, hey, hey, you two are trying to break my cover. It ain't easy being on the downlow. ;)
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by dbeden4153 (January 24, 2008 12:08 pm ET)
                     

                  I've had the "what's wrong with being gay" argument with a black friend when I worked in a restaurant.  Basically it came down to he was intolerant of homosexuals because of his religious beliefs, which I then proceeded to debunk until it got to to the point where he was like "I just don't like it, okay?"

                   

                  That's the attitudes that you have to deal with, and for that I am sorry.   

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Clevenative (January 24, 2008 1:14 pm ET)
                       

                    I’m sure Preston could back me up on this and provide more insight – but it’s not just a religious thing. Distain for homosexuality is deeply rooted in black (African) culture.

                    A quote from this story http://www.thewitness.org/agw/macauley121604.html titled “Africa and Homosexuality...

                    “If it were possible to determine homosexuality at birth, many African parents would repudiate their homosexual children before they have the chance to live. It is commonly said in Africa, “It is better to have the corpse of my child, than for me to accept that my child is gay.” As far as Africans are concerned, homosexuality is an abuse of traditional values. Homosexuality is seen as a sign of western sexual corruption and immorality. Some families believe that homosexuality is a result of occult activity and others that it is a disability.”

                    Other stories I’ve read explain how homosexuality is seen by them as a result of white supremecy, the feminisation of the black male – “brought” to Africa by Europeans. And of course if you look at black Islamic culture, there is an even bigger list of their beliefs and feelings regarding homosexuallity.

                    I have been close personal friends with only a handful of gay black men over the years, but now that I think of it, I can’t think of one of them who was “out” to their family. If this is the case with Preston, all I can tell him is that from my experience with coming out to my family – he is better off not admitting his sexuality to them. Perhaps he is better off in this regard. At any rate, I imagine, it can’t be easy for him to find acceptance amongst his “peeps”.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Preston (January 24, 2008 2:08 pm ET)
                         

                      Clevenative, thanks for the article, that was a great read. I often wondered was it a mix if religiosity and cultural roots that creates such homophobia within some black quarters. In many ways that article touched on some of the same points scholar Mark Anthony Neal explored in his book "New Black Man."

                      Again, thanks for that, the article was a great read.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by atheist (January 25, 2008 7:02 pm ET)
                           

                        This is an old thread so I'm assuming nobody is reading any more, but just in case ...

                        I would like to know why gay men are thought of as feminized !  In my opinion, it's like gay men and lesbian females are a 3rd and 4th gender unlike hetero male and hetero female.

                        Report Abuse
          • Author by loonz (January 23, 2008 10:14 pm ET)
               
            I feel horrible about the injustices of the past, to the point of tears when I think about it, and I'm ashamed that white racists still exist.  I'm getting sick of being treated like I'm the enemy just because I"m white.  It's like reverse racism !  I think phrases like "black agenda" and "black values" promote this type of racism.

            What do you think ?

            The reason why you were treated that way is that by and large America is still a racist society albeit not as overt.  The reactions you encountered from these black folk is a defensive mechanism to combat this racism.  There are  stories that that women on the elevator could have told you regarding her [bad] experiences with white people.  There are stories I could tell you and I'm sure Preston has some stories.  Unfortunately, these reactions will continue until racism is stomped from our society.  Phrases like "Black agenda" and "Black values" have nothing to do with it.  People who are pushing a "Black agenda" only do so to close this chasm-like disparity between White and Black folk.  There is a need for it.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Clevenative (January 23, 2008 10:22 pm ET)
               

            Athiest - My 2 cents...

            Wow, those are some stories. I’ve had similar things happen to me and know they can be difficult to put behind. For me the most recent was a white trailer-trash crackhead woman who came at me at an intersection because I used my horn when she didn’t move after the light turned green at the previous intersection . I’m a man – and she called me a fa$$ot! (Actually, I’m not sure of any part of my description of her, except the white woman part, the rest is perception - so I’m showing MY acceptance of prejudiced stereotypes – she LOOKED like trailer-trash crackhead.) It’s not uncommon for a lot of hotheads to use racial, ethnic, or sexual slurs when they are angry and the adrenalin is flowing. If you were a man dressed in flamboyant clothing she probably would have called you a f@g. Words bite – so we use them in defense, almost as second nature.

            I’m not making excuses for this type of behavior – only suggesting that the occasional racially charged outburst does not identify a whole race of people. The same goes on throughout the world. You heard Germans  called “krauts” or “Nazis” and Japanese called “japs” or “nips” as part of commonplace dialect in America for years after WWII - well into the 60’s and 70’s. As a child of the 50’s and 60’s I thought it was OK to hate them, yet I had absolutely no reason to do so. I heard derogatory names used for Jews and African-Americans in my own family, from my older brothers. I was well into my 20’s before I even started to consciously stop using such words. Prejudices are a hard thing to break – disparaging language is even a harder habit to crack.

            Just the consciousness of saying such racial or ethnic slurs is a big step in removing them from your language - It’s when you say these words without even realizing how distasteful and hateful they are that you have a problem.

             

            Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (January 23, 2008 10:55 pm ET)
             

          "But a "black agenda" does not ostracize whites who want to pitch in and help the cause of poor blacks in the inner cities today."

          That's exactly why it's fallacious to look at a phrase like "black agenda" and think it's wrong because "white agenda" would be wrong.   They're not equivalent because black and white people don't have the same general social or economic status.  There's still effects of slavery, still systemic racism.  There's a genuine reason for a "black agenda", to help rise up out of that, and that does not exclude anyone else.  On the other hand, white people have nothing to fight for.  We have the socio-economic advantages, generally speaking.  So if a "white agenda" serves no purpose for rising up, then the only alternative is to push someone else down.   Obviously that doesn't lend itself to the same sort of inclusiveness as the "black agenda".  White people may have no problem with helping black people become equal, but black people certainly won't sign up to lower their status.

          That's what makes a "white agenda" racist and a "black agenda" not.  I'm sure Finarfin could describe very well what a "white agenda" would be, and demonstrate the point.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Preston (January 24, 2008 4:21 am ET)
               

            Brabantio, it's good to see you, and as usual, I agree with you! I think when some people read or hear "black agenda" they think this is somehow all-black with no participation from other ethnic groups to pitch in and help. Conservatives like Sean Hannity often lack critical thinking skills, and history is always the worst enemy to people like him. I can't even sit and watch guys like him anymore because it's surreal that a person can actually say in all seriousness that black self-empowerment is the same as "white power." To do that one has to rive race history and twist concepts to make blacks fit into a prototype that does not represent our experience. Then again, I do remember a certain poster by the name of Bushlies where he said one of the absurd statements I've ever heard months ago: everyone that's born in America has start off as billionaires. Basically, we're all born rich, the wealth is here for the taken, all we have to do is follow the rules, work hard, and ANYONE can become as rich as Bill Gates and Oprah Winfrey! (Which kind of reminds me of something one of my British classmates told me. He said, "In Britain we don't have a British Dream like you Yanks with your America Dream. You know why? Because we're awake!")

            It just amazes me how simplistic some of the arguments I hear conservatives make regarding wealth, class and race. I use to listen and read a lot of conservative opinion just to keep me on my toes -- I can't do it anymore. Everything is always black-and-white (no pun intended) in their thinking. Many of them assess situations in comic book terms and it's quite hard to take serious. Race has always been one of those subjects that America hates to face because it challenges the conventional wisdom of the country being some perfect democracy. So being cockeyed optimists, dreaming, and denying current conditions that effects those who are disenfranchised is our way not to feel any responsibility to do something for those in need.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by August Heat (January 24, 2008 2:55 pm ET)
           
        Wow Atheist.  Again, I understand the analogy, but that doesn't make it a valid or sensical one.  The KKK, by todays standards, would've been terrorist.  They terrorized American citizens.  They lynched and killed.  If you can find one person from that church who has lynched, raped or attacked someone physically based on their race, then you may have a point.  This is a joke though.  I find it's real easy for people to call insurgents "terrorist" and to make innocent muslims scape goats for the actual people that attacked our towers, yet a church says support black business and politicians and are compared to the KKK.  Atheist that's a joke.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (January 23, 2008 7:19 pm ET)
         

      On the face of it an absurd position. So was questioning the bravery of a decorated Vietnam vetreran. Will conservative neural circuits bite america in the ass once more?

      Level the playing field. Accuse a group of people of being racist. See their just as bad as I am, and if you want to call it bad ,I'll accuse you of being a racist too. You can't take the higher moral ground, I won't allow it, at the least I'll ignore it.

      Can of worms, A head full of snakes. This corrosive nonsense will get  support by fellow travelors in the media.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Clevenative (January 23, 2008 7:36 pm ET)
         

      WOW! I bet Hannity slipped him a Benjamin Franklin under the table every time he said "KKK"!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (January 23, 2008 7:45 pm ET)
         
      and back in the day, a lot of those kkk members sat in church on sunday, and the minister did not say a word of condemnation of such tactics.  not everywhere and everyone, but too many.  just one of the many reasons i am cynical about organized religion.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (January 24, 2008 12:07 pm ET)
           

        and back in the day, a lot of those kkk members sat in church on sunday, and the minister did not say a word of condemnation of such tactics. 

        In many churches back then, the minister was also in the KKK...

        Report Abuse
    • Author by soybean (January 23, 2008 10:53 pm ET)
         
      The whole business about Obama's church is distorted and a fairly transparent attempt to undermine Obama's candidacy with variations on the theme of guilt through seven degrees of separation - or something like that.  Hannity and company and various other commentators   misrepresent the teachings of Obama's church and will continue the misrepresentations because the truth is not the point.  Also, heaven knows where we would be if the church newsletters of every Presidential candidate in the past had been combed for racism, or sexism, or anti-Catholocism, etc.  There are plenty enough of all of these things to find in churches and religious communities everywhere.  Note that Hillary Clinton received pastoral advice from Billy Graham during the Monica Lewinsky affair, and Billy Graham at one point is reported to have made anti-Semitic remarks in the White House.  No one focuses on this.  Ironically, the United Church of Christ, of which Obama's church is an affiliate, is one of the oldest Protestant denominations in the U.S., dating way back to Puritan days.  It is, of course, a progressive and inclusive church, reflecting, bizarrely enough an attempt in its conduct to approximate the virtues J.C. himself talked about in the Sermon on the Mount.  God forbid that a Christian church should actually try to adhere to the teachings of Christ or that we should have a Presidential candidate who belongs to such a church and is actually trying to run an honest campaign. What, indeed, is the country coming to???
      Report Abuse
    • Author by quiet_flight822 (January 23, 2008 11:01 pm ET)
         

      This is the first time I have been to this site. I was excited to see it because finally someone was going to hold media responsible for some of the idiotic comments we have to live with on both the conservative and liberal fronts. Instead what I am finding is yet another politically biased website that is hiding behind a fallacy of exposing the truth. Come on people, when are you going to wake up and stop looking at issues from a political viewfront and more from an American viewpoint. As far as I am concerned both parties need to get their heads out of their perverbial as*** and start to focus on what this Country truly needs. I personally think all the candidates in this race are pathetic and have no concept of these issues. You hold all of these media personalities responsible like Hannity, Tucker, etc...what about CNN and their band of "unbiased" reporters. Come on, stop the nonsense and lets work together to defeat the true crisis in this County (energy, healthcare, manufacturing, etc..). Im sure this post wont stay on this site for long, because like your opponents, you will also be a hypocrit and likely censor this post.

      True American.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (January 24, 2008 3:20 pm ET)
           

        Quiet,

        Welcome.  For the sake of argument.  Which CNN reports do you have a problem with?  Who do you think are the worst offenders?  Why? 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (January 25, 2008 10:44 am ET)
           

        Quiet_Flight – You should have read the Media Matters mission statement or “Who We Are” link that reads…

        "Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media."

        Note the words “CONSERVATIVE MISINFORMATION”?

        As for the fear of your post being removed – not to worry – you would have to have written something to incite a riot or murder to get censored from this site. All viewpoints are welcome.

        Welcome aboard – and I hope you will continue to visit and share your thoughts.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dmullins3647 (January 24, 2008 1:06 am ET)
         
      Chris Rock said it best when he stated  "There aint a white man out there who trade places with me, AND I'M RICH!  Apparently he was wrong though because Hannity is obviously jealous of black people.  Maybe Michael Jackson's doctor can do that thing in reverse.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 24, 2008 1:28 am ET)
         
      And all this time I though Obama was a freakin' Muslim...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dmullins3647 (January 24, 2008 1:58 am ET)
         

        I've almost broken Fox's code.  I know that Hannity is just an Acronym but haven't figured out exactly which one.  Can anyone help me out?

      Has                                        Have                                   Hateful

      Absolutely                              Another                               And

      No                                         Neurotic                               Nasty

      Need                                      News                                   Neocon

      In                                          Idiot                                    Immorally

      Telling                                     To                                       Thoughtless

      You truth                                Yap                                     Yes man

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 24, 2008 8:45 am ET)
         
      Peterson indirectly makes a valid point.  Both Farrakhan and and the KKK are despicable racists, and the extent to which one is more despicable than the other has no bearing on that fact.  If Jeremiah White, a public figure, associates with moral cretins like Farrakhan, than it should be perfectly okay to ask questions about this failing on his part.  Pointing to the KKK shouldn't excuse White from elaborating on what allures him to farrakhan. 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (January 24, 2008 12:28 pm ET)
           

        Thomp,

        The big differences are the actions taken by the KKK.  They have murdered and intimidated people for generations.  I am not sure if Farrakhan's followers have ever killed whites or Jews in furtherance of their agenda.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 24, 2008 1:15 pm ET)
             

          I'm not suggesting that there's any equivalency between Farrakhan and the KKK. Notwithstanding, determining that the KKK is worse than Farrakhan doesn't save the latter slime from still being an utterly deplorable individual.  That being the case, if this Jeremiah White fellow holds Farrakhan with esteem, I don't think there's anything unseemly in holding him to it, and asking questions like whether he agrees with Farrakhan's views on race . . . .

          So suggesting that Farrakhan's views (and possibly White's?) are to be left without scrutiny because they're not as bad as the KKK, doesn't make much sense to me.  That is why I said that Peterson "indirectly" had a point, as I didn't really read his  comment as drawing an equivalency between farrakhan and the kkk.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (January 24, 2008 1:41 pm ET)
               

            Thomp,

            Thanks for the clarification.  I am not a fan of Louis, but I think any comparison between him and the KKK is a stretch.  That's all.  I appreciate your response.

             

            Report Abuse
    • Author by edgarfield (January 24, 2008 8:56 am ET)
         

      First of all, I am not sure that Louis Farrakhan is in fact a registered member of the Democratic Party. Secondly, the KKK did more than espouse white values, they were a criminal enterprise, involved in torture, kidnapping, intimidation and murder on a vast scale. Thirdy, I'm not sure what the Nation of Islam has to do with a Christian church in Chicago. That said, it seems if you keep on the saying the same things over and over again even if they are baseless lies and fabrications they become the truth.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 24, 2008 9:03 am ET)
           
        Does Jeremiah White keep associations with the known racist, Farrakhan, or not?  Who's defending the KKK?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (January 24, 2008 9:22 am ET)
         

      Very nice posts, Preston and Brabantio! Unfortunately who is going to read all of that stuff? What the hell is 'critical thinking', too? I like my arguments to have superficial analogies and false equivalences in them: Trinity United Church of Christ = KKK  or black values = white values = racist

       It's so much simpler and I don't even have to know a thing about history or circumstances to understand it. You guys gotta learn how to sell your message better, otherwise you'll lose in the marketplace of ideas!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dbeden4153 (January 24, 2008 12:31 pm ET)
           

        Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

         

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Preston (January 24, 2008 2:11 pm ET)
           

        It's so much simpler and I don't even have to know a thing about history or circumstances to understand it. You guys gotta learn how to sell your message better, otherwise you'll lose in the marketplace of ideas!

        LOL! That was a good one!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (January 24, 2008 9:37 am ET)
         

      Following Peterson's November 29, 2004, appearance on Hannity & Colmes, Media Matters noted that Hannity is a strong supporter of Peterson's and is a member of the advisory board for Peterson's organization, Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny (BOND). On the BOND website, Hannity is quoted saying that organization "continues to fight the good fight standing for the values of God, family, and country, and are deserving of our support." Hannity has acknowledged his ties to Peterson and BOND in the past, but did not do so during Peterson's January 22 appearance.

      Sean Hannity seems to have his fingers in a lot of pies.  Perhale Faux News should start each of his shows with about five minutes worth of disclaimers...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (January 24, 2008 11:25 am ET)
         
      Interesting how Sean Hannity seems to have no problem with Republican politicians speaking at Bob Jones University (where students are not allowed to date Catholics), or at Council of Conservative Citizens CofCC rallies (a present-day offshoot of the KKK).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by xser88 (January 24, 2008 5:35 pm ET)
         

      I've seen this guy on YouTube and he is always trying to show blacks in a bad light only. Fox use this guy a lot like KABC talk radio use Larry Elder, A black man saying racist things against his own race without any evidence but never seeing it in others groups toward blacks. Here in Los Angeles talk radio is almost all right-wing conservatives and you can hear white host make racist comments about non-whites 24\7. One day we will be able to talk about white privilege.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.