About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Continuing to use "cocaine," Matthews again falsely claimed Penn "raise[d]" the issue on Hardball

January 24, 2008 7:24 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: Chris Matthews once again falsely claimed that Mark Penn, chief strategist for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign, "raise[d]" the issue of "cocaine" "on my show twice." Contrary to Matthews' assertion, Penn was not the first to "raise[]" the issue; Matthews devoted the entire Hardball segment to the controversy over comments about Sen. Barack Obama's past drug use by Billy Shaheen, a Clinton campaign co-chairman who subsequently resigned.

12 Comments

On the January 23 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews once again falsely claimed that Mark Penn, chief strategist for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's (D-NY) presidential campaign, "raise[d]" the issue of "cocaine" "on my show twice" and also falsely suggested that Bob Johnson, president of Black Entertainment Television and a Clinton supporter, had also used the word "cocaine" in reference to Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL). Matthews asked his guest, Air America president Mark Green: "Why did Mark -- why did Mark Penn raise it on my show twice, "cocaine, cocaine"? Why did Bob Johnson do it again? Why do they keep doing it?" Matthews' question about Penn refers to an exchange he had on the December 13 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Penn; David Axelrod, Obama's chief strategist; and Joe Trippi, an adviser to former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC). Contrary to Matthews' assertion that Penn "raise[d]" the issue of "cocaine," the entire Hardball segment was devoted to the controversy over comments about Obama's past drug use by Billy Shaheen -- a Clinton campaign co-chairman who subsequently resigned -- and Penn was not the first to "raise[]" the issue, as Media Matters for America documented. During the segment on January 23, Matthews used the word "cocaine" five times.

Later in the segment, Green said to Matthews: "That was the show where you kept using the line, 'Do things go better with Coke?' You weren't raising it to be racial." Matthews responded: "Yeah, you're right. You're right. You caught me there." As Media Matters noted, Matthews began the December 14 edition of Hardball by asking, "Is the Clinton campaign pushing the drug story? When it comes to stopping Obama, do things go better with coke?" Matthews and his guests went on to use the word "cocaine" a total of 10 times during the show.

This is not the first time Matthews has mischaracterized the exchange between him and Penn on the December 13 edition of his show. During the December 14 edition of Hardball, Matthews aired a video clip of the exchange three times. In all three cases, the clip did not include any of Matthews' questions and began with Penn's remark about "cocaine," giving no indication that Matthews had explicitly asked Penn at least three distinct questions about the topic and that Penn had offered at least two specific responses before he used the word "cocaine."

In addition, Matthews has also previously mischaracterized Johnson's remarks, falsely suggesting that Johnson had used the word "cocaine" at a campaign event for Clinton. On the January 14 edition of Hardball, in introducing the program's "Big Number" segment, Matthews said: "[Sen.] Obama admits in his own memoir that he used cocaine when he was growing up. Even if you haven't read the book, you probably know about it from all kinds of sources, like the Clinton campaign." He later asserted: "Three -- three mentions of Obama's cocaine use for political gain. Three: tonight's 'Big Number.' " Matthews cited Shaheen, Penn, and Johnson as examples. But in only one of those cases was the word "cocaine" used -- Penn during his December 13 appearance on Hardball -- and as noted above, in that situation it was Matthews who raised the issue of Obama's drug use.

From the January 23 edition of MSNBC's Hardball:

MATTHEWS: OK. Let me look at the pattern of what -- - both you look at the pattern of what President Clinton has said. He said "roll of the dice," he said all kinds of things. He's saying "fairy tale." He's used reference -- well, his surrogates and her surrogates, Hillary Clinton's surrogates, have used words like "cocaine, cocaine," references to the fact of his selling cocaine or using it or whatever -- using it -- I think I should be clear there -- all this sort of clever innuendo, talking about dealing with slumlords in the inner city.

Don't you sense a coloration, Mark, on the kind of snide remarks coming out of the whole Clinton campaign that sort of puts Barack back into the bad neighborhoods, sort of a street guy himself? Don't you sense the way they're coloring him into a box? I'm just asking. If you don't think so, let's argue about it.

GREEN: Chris, I've known you a long time. I absolutely don't think your implication that there's some racializing of the criticism. Ed, you, and I were on about a month ago on this exact point. Billy Shaheen, who referred to Obama's book, was out of line, was wrong, should have been fired. I don't believe there's any systematic effort to raise that issue, and frankly--

MATTHEWS: Why did Mark -- why did Mark Penn raise it on my show twice, "cocaine, cocaine"? Why did Bob Johnson do it again? Why do they keep doing it?

GREEN: May I answer? If you want to talk about what surrogates say, then the surrogate who said of Hillary Clinton -- who worked for Obama -- she's just the senator from Punjab, making fun of her pro-Indian views --

MATTHEWS: Right.

GREEN: When I read that, I didn't think Obama believed that. I thought it was some idiot staff person was saying it.

MATTHEWS: But Mark --

GREEN: Let me answer your question.

MATTHEWS: -- Penn is her message person. He's not a surrogate. He's the guy who writes the messages like inner city and slumlord. He's the confector of this theme.

GREEN: Let me --

MATTHEWS: He's not some bystander.

GREEN: Chris, that was --

MATTHEWS: Is he, or not?

GREEN: That was the show where you kept using the line, "Do things go better with Coke?" You weren't raising it to be racial. Shaheen was an idiot and was fired. Let's talk about what's happening with Bill Clinton now. I think Bill Clinton was -- is largely wrong in his attack on Iraq, largely right in his criticism on experience.

MATTHEWS: Yeah, you're right. You're right. You caught me there.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (January 24, 2008 9:30 pm ET)
         

      Self avowed GOP propagandist and suspected pedophile El Rushbo is really working this. Today he was running down his list of Obama points, including smoking (cigarettes) and the drug bit.Pretending to stumble over his words, the Oxymoron managed to get the phrase "smoking cocaine" out of his own depraved mouth.

      And we all know who "smokes cocaine", don't we?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by emri99220 (January 24, 2008 10:01 pm ET)
         
      There he goes again...Clinton bashing by redefining reality...it's his favorite indoor sport...Why does MSNBC keep him on the air...?  Can it be high ratings?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by joseph_b26 (January 25, 2008 3:12 am ET)
         

      Having We Had Enough Of Chris Matthews and MSNBC's Hatred Of The Democratic Front Runner

      Day after day, every other story on his show, Chris Matthews attacks Hillary Clinton by over analyzing every statement she makes. How long must we endure this? Matthews continues to pass his bias position off as journalistic excellence. This everyday occurrence must be helping Barack Obama, the Republicans, and anyone else in competition with Clinton. Is this fair?

      I have stopped watching his shows. In fact, I only watch bits and pieces of MSNBC. My support for Kieth Olbermann has dwindled because he too seems to be on the MSNBC "ban wagon"  against Clinton. Where is the objectivity of old? It has never been perfect, but it has never been this bad and rationalizing. These journalist think this is somehow a form of excellence the American people want. So when they create the perception Clinton and Obama are feuding with each other, why do they not take credit for their handy work? They insult the American people every time they ask the question "is this back and forth fighting among  the Democrats hurting the candidates.

      MSNBC, CNN, and Fox news should be made to declare their programming is a deliberate attempt to defeat Hillary Clinton. Let the American people put their actions in the bias perspective they claim is the best in news.

      Joseph

       

       

      Close Read more >>   Options >>  Visit Answers.com
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Clevenative (January 25, 2008 8:04 am ET)
         

      Once a can or worms is opened the smell there for all to sniff – regardless of who opened it. The person who actually opened it however, is Obama himself. Perhaps Obama realized that in some cultures the worms are a good thing, and a healthy food source – and for those who just hold their nose and say “Ewwwh”, well that is their problem.

      Obama's own admission, coupled with the fact that half of all youths in his generation did the same thing, makes this a non-issue. For those who are close-minded enough to think it IS an issue, I am sure Obama doesn’t expect or want there vote anyhow. I’m tired of reading about it.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (January 25, 2008 8:06 am ET)
           
        I hate early morning typos - should be "can of worms" of course. <yawn>
        Report Abuse
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 25, 2008 9:07 am ET)
         
      This is just another example of Matthews' continuing endorsement of Obama. As Green noted later in the same segment, he was the underdog in that particular "debate" because it was two Obama supporters, Matthews and Schultz, against him. Much of msnbc, including shuster and KO, are in bed with the obama camp.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (January 25, 2008 9:41 am ET)
           

        Thomp,

        Listening to Matthews I think he is in the McCain/Giuliani area.  His fawning statements of those two go far beyond anything he has ever said about Obama.

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 25, 2008 9:48 am ET)
             

          He fawns over many people. While mccain may be among them, so too is obama and edwards. However, now that edwards essentially is done,he definitely sides with obama in the democratic race.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by jmsedlak9262 (January 25, 2008 9:46 am ET)
         

      Matthews' mental illness is worsening

      He is certaily fixated on Clinton in a very unhearlthy way. This seems to go way beyond his usual MCP attitudes towards women - and why any woman appears on his show is a puzzlement.

      Does he really think that he is so influential in the presidential nomination race that he can ignore the truth?

      Matthews typifies what is wrong with the so-called news media today! They don't report the news, they make the news.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (January 25, 2008 10:26 am ET)
         
      How many times does this idiot have to be corrected on this point before he JUST STOPS using it?!  He'll cry him self to sleep once Judi drops out of the running.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 2mkm3082 (January 25, 2008 11:23 am ET)
         

      There's a blatant hatred of women and especially of Hillary Clinton spewing forth from MSNBC hosts like Chris Matthews, Keith O, Shuster, Scarobough, and guests like Mike Barnicle.  We the viewers have the power to do something about it.  That is, CHANGE CHANNELS.  I decided to do just that and after 4 days I have to say its been a pleasant surprise to hear other viewpoints from talking heads on competing stations.  My gain and MSNBC's loss.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by thomp.steve9098 (January 25, 2008 2:43 pm ET)
         

      The esteemed journalist, Matt Drudge, has posted on his site today a very touching picture of the Clintons and the fellow who HC so fondly characterized as a "slumlord" just a few days ago. Nice to know that she openly befriends folks in the slumlord profession.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.