Limbaugh: Clinton, "the most cheated-on woman in the world," now "surrounded" by her "white female new castrati male base"

SUMMARY: On his radio show, Rush Limbaugh claimed that Sen. Hillary Clinton is "in the Northeast ... surrounded by her good old ... white female new castrati male base, while her husband, Bill, pays penance -- left to deal in South Carolina, while she's up with her people, the whites and the less-than-blacks." Other media figures have also used various forms of "castrati" in reference to Clinton and her supporters, including Chris Matthews, who once questioned people who have endorsed Clinton, saying, "[A]ren't you appalled at the willingness of these people to become castratos in the eunuch chorus here or whatever they are?"
On the January 24 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh claimed that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) is "in the Northeast. She is surrounded by her good old, white female -- white female new castrati male base, while her husband [former President] Bill [Clinton] pays penance -- left to deal in South Carolina, while she's up with her people, the whites and the less-than-blacks." Later in the broadcast, referring to Clinton, Limbaugh asked: "How did that woman go from inevitable, to down-and-dirty, to the testicle lockbox, to her red-faced husband showing that even he, too, gets PMS?" As Media Matters for America has documented, Limbaugh has referred to Clinton's so-called "testicle lockbox" numerous times in the past. His comments, along with other "misogynist" discourse in the media, were the subject of an episode of PBS' Bill Moyers Journal in December.
Like Limbaugh, other media figures have also used various forms of "castrati" in reference to Clinton and her supporters. MSNBC host Chris Matthews has questioned people who have endorsed Clinton, saying, "[A]ren't you appalled at the willingness of these people to become castratos in the eunuch chorus here or whatever they are?" Likewise, Matthews' MSNBC colleague, host Tucker Carlson, said of Clinton: "[T]here's just something about her that feels castrating, overbearing, and scary."
Limbaugh made his comments during a monologue on what he called the "uncivil war" between the Democratic presidential campaigns of Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama (IL). Later in the show, Limbaugh said, "I think one of the best ways to expose Hillary is to show how far she fell in the real world," and called her "the most cheated-on woman in the world." He later said: "Her big success has actually been the 35 years of bimbo eruptions, ruining the reputations of the pretty girls who'd bopped up and said that they had had affairs with Bill Clinton. ... The 'Bimbo Eruption Operation,' that was pretty successful out there."
During the January 24 program, Limbaugh also claimed that Clinton "has an army of battle-tested pollsters and spinners, investigators, hit men and hit women. She has an under-the-radar gang of 527s with names that include the word 'America' in them. Like Media Matters for America, that really should be called Media Matters for Hillary. " In fact, Media Matters, which is not a 527 group, is an independent progressive organization, neither funded by nor affiliated with any candidate or political party.
From the January 24 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:
LIMBAUGH: And finally, there's this -- The Washington Post: "Some in the Democrat [sic] Party are bristling at Clinton's attacks; anti-Obama ads heighten unity fears in the Democrat Party." It's by Alec MacGillis and Anne Kornblut, and it's a pretty hard-hitting piece on the Clintons. There's also a story in the Financial Times today from Davos, Switzerland, talking about how Clinton is damaging his national brand by not being in Davos and by conducting the campaign the way he is doing so. Meanwhile, Mrs. Clinton is where? She's in the Northeast. She is surrounded by her good old, white female -- white female new castrati male base, while her husband, Bill, pays penance -- left to deal in South Carolina, while she's up with her people, the whites and the less-than-blacks. Clinton is in South Carolina, going door-to-door, knocking on those doors and begging for votes. But who are these people in South Carolina? While Mrs. Clinton hobnobs at tea parties in the Northeast with those people, her husband, Bill Clinton, makes the rounds in South Carolina with the people of color.
And what does he do when he leaves the homes of the people of color? He disses 'em! He's running around, knocking on the doors. He says, "Hey, babe. You know me, first black president. I am here to help you. I'm here to tell you that we're going to do more for you, we care more for you, we love you more than anything. We need your vote. Hillary loves you. You know it; I know it." And as soon as he leaves, he goes to USA Today; he goes to The New York Times' door: "I know Obama's going to win. Hell, it's just a bunch of black people down here voting. That's why Obama's gonna win, 'cause black people are gonna support black people."
And then he goes to the next house: "Hey, babe. You know me. I'm your first black president, Bill Clinton. You know the things I did for you. I kept your church from being burned, and when your church did burn, I showed up and cried." Arkansas forward: "I even sat on the back of the bus one day for you, in 1999, when I could have been driving [inaudible], I purposely moved to the back of the bus. You know that my wife and I, Hillary, we care about you more than anybody ever has. Hell, you called me the first black president, said my life was just like yours. We are beggin' for your vote here in South Carolina."
He leaves, goes to the microphones: "My wife's gonna lose here and it's this Obama guy putting out hit jobs on me. He's gonna win. The black people are voting for Obama; that's what's gonna happen."
Meanwhile, Hillary's sipping tea and scones in the Northeast with Ann Lewis and the others of the non-dark persuasion.
[...]
LIMBAUGH: Now, back to Mrs. Clinton. She was inevitable until she actually ran. Have you -- everybody's so caught up in the uncivil war and the -- you know, the entertainment factor here of Bill Clinton claiming that Obama interjected race and is putting out hit jobs on him, but have you noticed what's had to happen here? I think one of the best ways to expose Hillary is to show how far she fell in the real world. Mrs. Clinton wasn't the only one who thought she was inevitable. She actually was. The whole Democrat Party thought she was inevitable until she ran.
She has the last name of a liberal icon: Clinton. She has a first name known around the world: Hillary. She has control of one of the most powerful national political machines in our history. She is the most cheated-on woman in the world. She has the leading Democrat fundraiser. She has the longest database of contributors -- legal and illegal. She was inevitable. She was vacuuming up all of that money way before these other Democrats got in the race. She has an army of battle-tested pollsters and spinners, investigators, hit men and hit women. She has an under-the-radar gang of 527s with names that include the word "America" in them. Like Media Matters for America, that really should be called Media Matters for Hillary. The America Think -- Think Forward Progress -- whatever the -- there's so many Hillary front groups out there. They're actually 527s disguised as think-tanks.
She was inevitable. She even has a rigged primary calendar -- a compressed primary schedule that favored the candidate with the greatest name recognition and money, and also favored the candidate with the most to lose by going out there and opening her mouth all the time. The more she speaks, the more her numbers go down. So they compressed all of this, so that by February 5th, the race would be over.
With all of that -- from the money on down to the machine, to the inevitability of it all, to all of these front groups, to all of the George Soros money, to -- from all of that, look where we are. She went from inevitable to not-so-inevitable -- to maybe not inevitable. And now people are asking: "Who ever said she was inevitable?" She did. She was running on a coronation and a lot of people bought into it.
How did a woman -- I ask you this question: How did a woman who is connected by chromosome to more than half the electorate -- that would be women, for those of you in Rio Linda -- how did a woman connected by chromosome to more than half the electorate, who doesn't have an experienced rival -- don't tell me Edwards, don't tell me Obama. She does not have an experienced rival. How did that woman go from inevitable, to down-and-dirty, to the testicle lockbox, to her red-faced husband showing that even he, too, gets PMS?
Mrs. Clinton says that she bears the scars of her health care plan defeat. Actually, scars are a little too romantic. Warriors bear scars. Cosmetic surgery leaves scars. The most cheated-on woman in the world has emotional scars. This health care plan defeat -- that was not a scar. That was an F: a failed grade. Blew it big time. Same thing with handling the Paula Jones case; same thing with advising on other legal issues in the White House.
Her big success has actually been the 35 years of bimbo eruptions, ruining the reputations of the pretty girls who'd bopped up and said that they had had affairs with Bill Clinton -- a warning to pretty girls who were going to pop up and say that, that they'd better not. The "Bimbo Eruption Operation," that was pretty successful out there. Gets an F.
So, where did inevitable ever come from in the first place? They got it out there, plus she's owed this. As [Washington Post columnist] Charles Krauthammer said: "This is one huge alimony check she is cashing" -- a coronation for the presidency, an inevitable campaign. I'm beginning to wonder, though, will Mrs. Clinton's White House run be as big a failure as her health care plan? 'Cause I really want to know, how do you go from inevitable to people now asking, "Whoever said she was inevitable?" Well, she was inevitable and heading down that path to the coronation until one little grim reality got in the way, and that is she had to campaign.















Would this be considered a RANT? Or maybe a WHINE?
I know how Limbaugh himself would characterize such hysterical bleating and hand-wringing: Here is a castrato PMSing.
Memo to Rush Limbaugh: Listen to the recordings of one Alessandro Moreschi (1854-1922), the only castrato whose musical voice was recorded for posterity, and you'll understand just how awful the castrati sounded in their glory days with church choirs and operatic troupes.
And why the Vatican took pains to ban castrati from choirs under its control, not to mention disapproving the "hideous and barbaric practice" behind it.
(The Oxycontin Sow ought to know that the recordings of Moreschi were made over 100 years ago, so expect them to be of rather poor quality by modern standards.)
How is this site "Pro-Hillary" whne it runs all the pro-Obama stuff they do? It a progressive site, and she's a Democrat. She may not be the best prograssive ou there (after all, Obama is!) but she's still preferebl;e to ANY republican! (From MMFA's POV, if not from yours.)
They are anti-conservative mis-information, which is bound to make them defend Hillary. If they were "pro-Hillary" as opposed to merely progressive they would be helping her detroy Obama. They're not, so your point is not valid.
Let's see, Obama is a new agent of change who doesn't want to divide the country between conservative and liberal, and he believes in coming together with Republicans across the table, and....
Yeah, that's real progressive...
It's a recipe for disaster.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?pid=257054
Kucinich is the Progressive standard bearer, at least according Democracy for America and Progressive Democrats for America. After Kucinich, it's Edwards then Obama and then Hills. I disagree somewhat, I think Chris Dodd has more Progressive stances than Edwards, but whatever.
Granted the survey is not exactly scientific. It's just a bunch of leftwingers sounding off on leftwing websites in leftwing surveys about leftwing candidates. But again, whatever.
Are you serious? The Clintons are "spewing lies" about Obama. The Clinotns are campaigning for the presidency, not Harvard Law Review.
The Clinton are campaigning for a PRIMARY NOT the general election. Those same Obama folks that they are lying about they'll NEED their support come November. What are there chances of getting that support? It’s a problem Democrats have had for years, shooting themselves in the foot during the primary and having people so disgusted that they stay at home during November. We damn well should be smarter by now!
So it’s OK for Bill and Hillary to lie. So Obama wasn’t lying when he accused the Clintons of lying. His problem was he was honest, simply honest. Regan was THE MOST polarizing President since the 60's and 70's! History would tell you that the 60’s and 70’s were turbulent years. Civil Rights movement, Assassination of MLK and Robert Kennedy, Vietnam War, Affirmative Action and The Draft just to name a few. The Republican “Southern Strategy” took a back seat to progressive ideas UNTIL Regan cam along. Regan re-instituted the “Southern Strategy” which was anti- black, anti-welfare, anti-poverty and anti-affirmative action. THAT is what he meant. The Clinton knew this but decided to play dirty. Is it to much to ask a politician who is suppose to represent MY party to TELL THE FREAKING TRUTH!.
I’m naive right. I suppose your are one of those people who would have told black folks during slavery that they were naive in thinking that slavery would end, right. After all what type of power did slaves hold. You would have also been one to tell MLK that he was naive in thinking that one day there would be no more "White's Only" signs across this nation. Blacks would not have the right to vote and women would not have the right to control their own bodies. If that's were being “naive” has gotten us I’ll take that “naive” over the same old lying, say and do anything to get elected politician any day. By the I’m a lifelong Democratic and Bill & Hillary appear so Republican like with their dirty, slimy, nasty politics.
Oh and Obama should be "happy" as her VP. Do you have a clue how insulting that sounds? She will not get my vote come November, no matter who is her VP, period!
“Regan re-instituted the “Southern Strategy” which was anti- black, anti-welfare, anti-poverty and anti-affirmative action. THAT is what he meant."
Why didn't he just say those things about Reagan then? You sound like a NeoCon pundit telling us what Bush really meant even though his words totally contradict what they tell us he really meant.
"I suppose your are one of those people who would have told black folks during slavery that they were naive in thinking that slavery would end, right."
Are you really this reactionary and uniformed to try to draw parallels between Obama getting in the political wars to slavery in the United States? Come on Pearl, you can do better than that."Oh and Obama should be "happy" as her VP. Do you have a clue how insulting that sounds? She will not get my vote come November, no matter who is her VP, period!"
Do you have a clue at how unhinged you are to think being a VP of the United States after only being in the Senate for 2/3ds of your first term is an insult. I think it is a heck of a trajectory. You don't?
Don't vote for Hillary in the general, just like I didn't vote for Gore, and eight years from now, like me, you will have learned your lesson. Hillary Clinton has been attacked and had the truth about her distorted for 16 friggin years and your man Obama can't even take two weeks.
This has nothing to do with race and everything to do with strength. Democrats have had their heads beaten in by conservatism for 7 straight years and we are ready to start busting some heads open. Hillary is a fighter, Obama is a lover.
If Obama were to lose the general in 2008, assuming he wins the nomination, would he run again in 2012? Say Hillary won the primary, and named Obama as the VP, the Democratic Party could be set for the next 16 years in the Executive Branch. And the argument of inexperience will no longer exist. If you truly are a Democrat, it makes much more sense for the base to support Hillary as Pres and Obama as VP due to the stability it brings the Party for the next 16 years. Obama will only be 54 in 2016.
“Regan re-instituted the “Southern Strategy” which was anti- black, anti-welfare, anti-poverty and anti-affirmative action. THAT is what he meant."Why didn't he just say those things about Reagan then? You sound like a NeoCon pundit telling us what Bush really meant even though his words totally contradict what they tell us he really meant.
It was a remarkable moment: A young, free-thinking presidential hopeful named Bill Clinton sat down with reporters and editors at The Post in October 1991 and started saying things most Democrats wouldn't allow to pass their lips. Ronald Reagan, Clinton said, deserved credit for winning the Cold War. He praised Reagan's "rhetoric in defense of freedom" and his role in "advancing the idea that communism could be rolled back." "The idea that we were going to stand firm and reaffirm our containment strategy, and the fact that we forced them to spend even more when they were already producing a Cadillac defense system and a dinosaur economy, I think it hastened their undoing," Clinton declared.
It appears that YOU are the only one who did not know what Obama meant, Bill Clinton sure did since he did the same thing campaigning back in 1991.Are you really this reactionary and uniformed to try to draw parallels between Obama getting in the political wars to slavery in the United States? Come on Pearl, you can do better than that.First you ask if I think is change can happen from giving good speeches. Yes. You do remember "I Have a Dream". Gotta say that speech was pretty damn good as well as effective enough to change a country.You then go on to call Obama supporters naive in thinking that Obama being a black man and having a "Muslim" sounding name would be nothing more than the perfect stereotype for Republicans to destroy but you forget that destroying the Clintons is a game the Republicans have perfected. Republicans wrote the book and would love NOTHING better than Hillary. It is NOT naive to hope and dream for change is my point. If slaves and black folks from the civil rights movement had taken your approach CHANGE would have NEVER happened they would have stayed where they were because of the risk but they DID NOT. No RISK no REWARD! I think that people, as evident from the Iowa vote, will look at Obama as much more than an African American man with a Muslim sounding name.
Look at it this way you can vote for Obama as VP when you vote for Hillary as President come November.
THAT sounds awfully condescending to me.
Do you have a clue at how unhinged you are to think being a VP of the United States after only being in the Senate for 2/3ds of your first term is an insult. I think it is a heck of a trajectory. You don't?
Oh and no I’m in no way unhinged. You are uninformed IF you think for one moment with Bill Clinton as 1st whatever Hillary's VP will have ANY role whatsoever. Hillary may be President but Bill will also be President and the VP role will be simply for show.
Democrats have had their heads beaten in by conservatism for 7 straight years and we are ready to start busting some heads open.
The reason we got Junior was the Supreme Court. NEVER question whether I'm a true Democratic, I unlike YOU VOTED FOR AL GORE! You assume like Bill and Hillary that they can say anything and do anything in the primary and I as a Democratic I won't have a choice but to vote for her. While I will admit I'm extremely uncomfortable not voting currently I'm MORE uncomfortable VOTING FOR HILLARY. If Democrats lose in 2008 it will be because of the nasty primary run by the Clintons alienating part of their own base and the public's desires not to relive the Clinton years.
They're both corporate Democrats.
It's one thing to say about one individual or perhaps even a small group of people bad or nefarious things about them if they're beliefs are different that yours.....
It's another to blanket statement that all men that are Hillary supporters are eunuchs or whatever.....
Rush is a fat pompous ass-clown that should be extremely careful on, not what he says specifically, but how he says it and in what context.....
That or when someone calls him on his idiocy or would rather 'get' in his face to deal with this crap, Rush would have only his mouth to blame.....or Bill Clinton..... whichever comes to mind first! :)'
white female new castrati male base
is?
"She's in the Northeast. She is surrounded by her good old, white female -- white female new castrati male base, while her husband, Bill, pays penance -- left to deal in South Carolina, while she's up with her people, the whites and the less-than-blacks"--RL
Some further translation: "Hillary Clinton has gratefuly escaped the manly, but also heavily Black South, for the mostly non-Black and feminine North, thanks to her husband who will stay and do the dirty work of campaigning for the Black vote."
Someone of dual heritage, i.e. a black and a white parent. Also known as "halfrican" in Limbaugh-speak, but formerly referred to as "mulattoes" in the old vernacular -- by those who practice their politics in white hoods.
The most cheated on? I thought that was Rudy, who married his cusin 1st. Or Newt, who told his wife he was leaving while she was in the hospital. Or Mitt, who's daddy had multiple wives at the same time, and because of his daddy's decision became an illegal immigrant. Or Larry C., the toe tapping troller who cheated on her wife and on her sexuality. Or page bender boy...
god, the list just goes on and on, doesn't it?
Well they may be the only part left of this tub of lard that works - Surely not his brain or the thing they’re connected to – these comments and his Viagra use proves that.
I understand, that Rush is not a commentator, nor a journalist, nor someone with any claim to expertise on politics ... no credentials, training, or education on the subject ... and is supposed to be a COMEDIAN.
The problem is, a COMEDIAN is supposed to be funny, and Rush is not. He is offensive, he demonstrates a laundry list of neurosis, paranoia, and seething hatreds, and he simply whines incessantly.
COMEDY is among the hardest professions. It is obviously too hard for Rush.
He had a good premise--"an uncivil war", and the background music evoking the Civil War to go with it. However, he didn’t make it funny. He packed so many messages in there; I don’t think his intention was to be funny. If he was trying to be humorous, he bit off more than he could chew.
With that in mind, then, what would prevent the broadcast @ key points in the programme (as in @ the start of every hour and coming out of ad breaks) of disclaimers stating that The Rush Limbaugh Show is not a news commentary programme, but rather entertainment packaged as news?
Otherwise, questions need to be raised of possible deception.
Is Hillary the Most Cheated On Woman In The World? Mmmm....does anyone keep statistics on that sort of thing? ;-)
Hillary certainly has been cheated on a great many times, does anyone dispute that? But I'm sure someone, somewhere probably has her beat in that category.
And the phrase "Bimbo Eruptions" wasn't coined by some evil Right-Winger, or even David Brock while he was still blinded by the Right. No that came from Betsey Wright, who was Bill Clinton's chief-of-staff when he was governor. She came up with that clever phrase during the 1992 campaign to describe the revelations of Bill's extra curricular activities :-O
Now I don't happen to blame Bill or Hillary for the all the racial stuff that's reared it's ugly head over the past several weeks. IMO, their remarks were misinterpreted by others. However, Bill isn't helping matters by still going on about it. I thought there was supposed to be a truce?
Rush's little rant here, while cynical & off base more often than not, probably does mirror what some folks think of the Clintons. But Rush should be the last one to blast anyone else...people who live in glass houses & all that ;-)
You can blame the media solely for the bad rap they get, or you can be honest & admit that the Clintons own behavior has brought some of this on themselves.
Who the hell is blaming the media "solely" for the bad rap the Clintons get?
If you set up any more straw men you might as well change your name to "Scarecrow."
Why don't you just admit Limbaugh is going to be a d*ckhead no matter what the Clintons do and be done with it.
Is this another example of a conservative Republican commentator trying to be John Stewart and once again failing miserably?
Let me ask you, do you think that moderate, sensible Democrats and liberals would be comfortable with your far leftist opinions being attached to them?
I doubt it.
What I do know is congressional Republicans made Rush Limbaugh an honorary member.
I didn't hear any outcry from rank and file Republicans to rescind the honor.
Draw your own conclusions.
Once again, you lie down with dogs...
what is wrong with all the little men thier rabbid again reminds me of 1992 now they are even saying mitt could beat hillary on msnbc someone take thier weed away .
Didn't Tweety just use this one???
Shouldn't a genius like Limbaugh be able to come up with his own material?
So now in addition to being a drug addict, he's a plagiarist too...
"The most cheated-on woman in the world."
No, Rush, that would be Mrs. Larry Craig.
Once again, MMfA goes beyond its mission of pointing out supposed 'conservative misinformation' and feels it necessary to assert its differing opinion. Apparently, there's no place for ANY disagreement on the left. Rush was stating his OPINION - where's the misinformation?
Look..It's more and more obvious that MMfA is supported by the Clintons. Even Obama is getting hammered here.
As a moderate republican, I am somewhat disillusioned by the GOP candidates. I would consider voting for Obama, but never, EVER would I vote for Clinton. I've seen that 'dog-n-pony' show before. They (and I do mean they - as in co-presidents', Bill & Hill) don't have a chance. You dems better hope that Obama gets the nomination because there are many like me who will vote for the non-clinton. No matter who it is.
GOODFELLA:
Well, if you vote for the GOP nominee, no matter which one THAT is (excepting Paul), you're voting to continue Bush/Cheney and their policies.
I can't imagine what kind of criteria you would use to decide that four more years of Bush would be better than a possibility of replicating the 90's.
More debt, more war, more torture, less accountability, worse economy ... all this you'd VOTE FOR, because you fear the Clintons will ... what? Balance the budget? I don't get it.
"
“Rush was stating his OPINION - where's the misinformation?"--GF
His opinion is insulting and purely speculative. However, he doesn’t say “in my opinion”, does he? He states his opinion as if he was reading from the Bible. Their mission statement doesn't include highlighting scandalizing blather, but perhaps it should.
Perhaps their mission statement should also include “to show where these ‘conserservatives’ are coming from”. This is often, as in this case, with a racist mindset.
Much of hate radio's success is based on scandalization of Democrats, with the Democrats not publicly responding directly or at least through surrogates. This makes them look weak in the public mind---'punked out' to use the slang.
You dems better hope that Obama gets the nomination because there are many like me who will vote for the non-clinton. No matter who it is.
No problem, there simply aren't that many of you. Moderate republicans who won't vote for HRC. Go ahead. Knock yourself out. This is "concern troll" talk at full volume.
You dems better hope that Obama gets the nomination because there are many like me who will vote for the non-clinton. No matter who it is.
Don’t “you Repubs” have enough to worry about with getting a unified candidate in your own party?
I’m sure you’ll just vote for the ”non-Dem. No matter who it is” - just like you always do.
I could use the term better for Ann Coulter, if I ever wanted to travel that low route. I've wondered why her Adams apple was rather large...
I used to think that the psychological concept of projection was bunk. Rusty, however, proves me wrong. This comment is classic.
If you listen to him for two minutes you'll understand what I'm talking about.
I saw the KO bit you’re talking about and thought it was hilarious – it was right on - he did a good job.
What, he should have used his “Ted Baxtor” voice? Doing a parody of a woman using a near identical sounding feminine voice is demeaning to women? Or chauvinistic?
Your argument carries about as much altitude as a lead balloon.
I won't even try to argue either of these last 2 posts, other than to say she DOES sound like a teenage bimbo! I still stand by my assertion that KO was not being demeaning to women simply by doing a parody of one.
I will remind you though, that the mission of this site is to point out "Conservative misinformation". Why should, or would, MMFA make anything of something that KO says? Is he a conservative?
I am sure everyone welcomes your viewpoints on the subject matter of any post. However, injecting KO into this story was not keeping "on subject" - and perhaps I should have just ignored your post - and would have, had I not witnessed the same piece you wrote about, and felt compelled to discredit what I considered YOUR "conservative misinformation".
If you want to join in parroting discussions on items that you consider "liberal misinformation", there are plenty of web sites out there for you to do just that - but there are very few trolls who get by with posting their drivel here at MM.
Feel no obligation to respond to my posts. I just wanted to see whether there are any boundaries to liberal hypocrisy. Like the instant case, I was just curious whether liberals think it offensive when conservative women are discounted by left-wingers merely by reason of their gender. Maybe you don't. And that's fine that you feel comfortable with being a hypocrite
As for getting off topic, you are misguided. Many comments have concerned sexism on the part of media commentators. KO is a commentator and exhibited sexist behavior last night. I felt there was no need to add to the chorus by deploring limbaugh, so I simply decided to expose another example of sexism by the media. And I'm sorry that someone with a differing point view has "intruded" on this site. I forgot that the leftwing thought police allows no such thing
I was just curious whether liberals think it offensive when conservative women are discounted by left-wingers merely by reason of their gender.(Thompsteve)
You really don't understand that KO was mainly addressing what she was saying ? Big difference between that and the rightys(Rush & hannity with their boffo Bill Clinton impersonations, for example) who do their acts while reciting stuff they're completely making up.
Regan was THE MOST polarizing President since the 60's and 70's! Any guy who wins 49 states is hardly polarizing. What do you not like, his restoration of our national dignity, demise of the soviet union, economic recovery?
Oh, like an octaroon. No, an octaroon is 1/8 negro.
I don't like thew fact that so many Americans are suckers for the Reaganophiles' revisionist history fantasy.
And I think an octoroon is a cookie.
He approved the cia covert ops in central & south america, which led to thousands killed and lives shattered.
He reversed 30 years of progress of the middle class, raised the social security tax on them while lowering the income tax rate for the super rich.
He poured money into the military industrial complex at the expense of everything else.
Yes, he was a polarizing figure. Those 49 states had plenty of people in them who didn't vote for him...and deplore his legacy.
Cheated on? Im glad he didn't say the "most cheated woman in the world..."
That would be any one of Rush's three wives, or Ann Coulter's first wife (before Ann had surgery and change teams).
Lymphbug...
Really... Can't you do any better than that? I mention how Bobby Fischer certainly had what you're referring to, standing up to b.s. on rollerskates here in America, his own country.
www.freewebs.com/writingindependence/FischerEditorial.pdf
www.freewebs.com/writingindependence/main.htm
AM radio's equivalent of the public bathroom stall, be sure to protect yourself with: handy pouches of antisceptic wipes, available in many brands at all locations!--this is not a paid promotional advertisement and does not reflect the promotional views of any specific product or manufacturer.