About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Blitzer and Todd falsely present August 2007 Michelle Obama comment as current attack on Clintons

January 25, 2008 5:19 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: On CNN's The Situation Room, Wolf Blitzer and correspondent Brian Todd aired a video clip of Michelle Obama's August 16, 2007, comment, "So our view is that if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House," falsely suggesting that she had recently made the comment in the context of exchanges between the presidential campaigns of Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton. The remark, Blitzer suggested, showed Michelle Obama going "[t]oe to toe with the former President Bill Clinton."

22 Comments

On the January 24 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer and correspondent Brian Todd each played a video clip of Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) wife, Michelle, saying, "So our view is that if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House," a remark that, Blitzer suggested, showed her going "[t]oe to toe with the former President Bill Clinton." And in his report, Todd said that the remark "was seen by some as a dig at the Clintons." By airing the video and in their commentary, both Blitzer and Todd suggested that Michelle Obama's comment was recent and made in the context of exchanges between the Democratic presidential campaigns of Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (NY). In fact, that comment is from August 16, 2007, months before the primaries and the current candidates' back-and-forth to which Blitzer and Todd referred. Moreover, Michelle Obama's full August, 16, 2007, remarks and comments -- which CNN did not air -- as well as comments made shortly thereafter by Sen. Obama made it clear that she was not attacking the Clintons.

While CNN flashed the date of the video clip during Todd's report, it did not indicate the date during Blitzer's teaser and introduction of Todd's report. And neither Blitzer nor Todd noted that the video was not current.

Blitzer teased the report by saying, "Michelle Obama, out on the campaign trail," then aired the clip of Michelle Obama's comment from a campaign event in Atlantic, Iowa, on August 16, 2007, before adding, "Toe to toe with the former President Bill Clinton -- this potential first lady holds her own to back her husband." Later, in his report, referring to Michelle Obama, Todd asked: "[W]ill she go on the offensive if her husband keeps taking body blows?" After airing a clip of Valerie Jarrett, identified as an "Obama family friend," saying that she has never seen Michelle Obama "in attack-mode or anything like that," Todd said: "But this remark was seen by some as a dig at the Clintons." The clip of Michelle Obama's comment then aired, after which Todd said: "Michelle Obama's chief aide says she was only talking about her own family, about the partnership between she and her husband, not insinuating anything about the Clintons. Analysts say it's crucial now that she not go negative."

Aside from falsely suggesting that Michelle Obama's comments were made during the current back-and-forth between the campaigns, neither Blitzer nor Todd provided the complete quote. As Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, immediately following her comment about "run[ning] your own house," Michelle Obama went on to discuss how she and her husband were making an effort to keep their children "grounded" and to ensure that their children will continue to "come first." In addition, neither noted, as CNN's website did at the time, that shortly after Michelle Obama's speech, Barack Obama "emphatically denied the comments were aimed at his rival and asserted, 'There was no reference beyond her point that we have had an administration that talks a lot about family values but doesn't follow through.' "

From Michelle Obama's August 16 remarks in Atlantic, Iowa:

MICHELLE OBAMA: [O]ne of the most important things that we need to know about the next president of the United States is, is he somebody that shares our values? Is he somebody that respects family? Is a good and decent person? So our view was that, if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House. So, so we've adjusted our schedules to make sure that our girls are first, so while he's traveling around, I do day trips. That means I get up in the morning, I get the girls ready, I get them off, I go and do trips, I'm home before bedtime. So the girls know that I was gone somewhere, but they don't care. They just know that I was at home to tuck them in at night, and it keeps them grounded, and, and children, the children in our country have to know that they come first. And our girls do and that's why we're doing this. We're in this race for not just our children, but all of our children.

Blitzer also discussed Michelle Obama's August 2007 remarks with strategists Donna Brazile and John Feehery on the August 21, 2007, edition of The Situation Room, but failed to provide the full context of her remarks. And on the August 21, 2007, edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, guest host Lisa Sylvester teased a segment on the "run your own house" comments, claiming that Michelle Obama "apparently blast[ed] Senator Hillary Clinton." Sylvester later aired the clip without showing Michelle Obama's full quote.

From the January 24 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: Michelle Obama, out on the campaign trail.

MICHELLE OBAMA [video clip]: So our view is that if you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House.

BLITZER: Toe to toe with the former President Bill Clinton -- this potential first lady holds her own to back her husband.

Plus, conservative talk show hosts targeting John McCain. They're sparing no criticism of the Republican -- arguably, he's the Republican front-runner right now.

[...]

BLITZER: You won't see her on the bitter battlefield between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, but Michelle Obama is becoming increasingly important to her husband's presidential campaign and offering a stark contrast to the other leading candidate's spouse -- that would be Bill Clinton.

Let's go to Brian Todd; he's watching this story for us.

All right, tell us a little bit about Michelle Obama, what she is doing for her husband.

TODD: Well, Wolf, by many accounts, she was reluctant to get into this race at first, but is now seen as a campaign asset that her husband seems to need now more than ever.

[begin video clip]

MICHELLE OBAMA: Are you all hungry for some change?

TODD: In a campaign getting nastier by the sound bite, she strikes a tone of civility.

MICHELLE OBAMA: My deep hope is that people will base their decision on who they think they can trust, who's got a vision for the country, who's bringing a different, you know, tone to politics, and who's going to really take this country in a different direction. And, quite frankly, I think the only person that comes close to that is Barack.

TODD: Seen as inherently decent, down to earth, straightforward and tough, Michelle Obama says she can talk about her husband in a way he never would. It's certainly not how Bill Clinton's talking about her husband.

BILL CLINTON: When he put out a hit job on me.

TODD: Analysts say Michelle Obama's striking contrast to that kind of attack is a huge boost to her husband. And with Barack Obama getting drawn deeper into verbal combat with both Clintons, they say she's crucial to keeping his message in play.

ROLAND MARTIN (CNN contributor): To be able to have somebody on the campaign trail who is consistently emphasizing unity, emphasizing one nation, one voice, one agenda, that is critical.

TODD: Harvard Law grad, successful attorney in her own right, Michelle Obama was reluctant to get into the race, friends and aides tell us. At first, didn't want her husband to run. She's fiercely protective of their young daughters back in Chicago.

MICHELLE OBAMA: Our kids are hilarious, just like many people's kids. They keep us grounded.

TODD: Her platform: helping people balance family and work. Aides say she won't delve into policy if she becomes first lady.

But will she go on the offensive if her husband keeps taking body blows?

VALERIE JARRETT (family friend): I've never seen her in a -- in attack-mode or anything like that.

TODD: But this remark was seen by some as a dig at the Clintons.

MICHELLE OBAMA: If you can't run your own house, you certainly can't run the White House.

[end video clip]

TODD: Michelle Obama's chief aide says she was only talking about her own family, about the partnership between she and her husband, not insinuating anything about the Clintons. Analysts say it's crucial now that she not go negative. It'll not only make the campaign look bad, but the Clintons will likely counter her very directly -- Wolf.

BLITZER: Brian, thanks very much. Brian Todd, reporting.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (January 25, 2008 5:32 pm ET)
         
      This may be the media stoking the fires a bit, but it's really unnecessary considering the former POTUS has transformed himself from a unifying, dignified world adversary for laudable charitable causes into a sniping, whining pit bull attacking politician - all in the name of getting his wife elected and both of them back in the White House.  How sad.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lynn (January 25, 2008 5:48 pm ET)
           
        I agree and it's quite unbecoming. I know you hate Olbermann but he made a great point the other night. He said that generally when primary candiates start snapping and getting too ugly with each other they send out the senior party leaders to quiet stuff down. What do you do when the most senior party leader is out acting the ass?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (January 25, 2008 6:07 pm ET)
             

          Lynn,

          I don't hate Olbermann, I just don't have much time for those who continue on their little whiny vendettas against their competition and think that we, the public, are as invested or interested in it than they are......both he and O'Reilly operate the same in this regard.  Frankly, it's tiring.

          And I agree with him, and you, regarding Bill Clinton.  I understand how campaigns have to be on the offensive towards other campaigns in hotly contested primaries, but can't they find someone else to do Hillary's dirty work for them besides an ex-President, I don't care if he is her husband.......it's so unseemly, and unprofessional. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (January 25, 2008 6:16 pm ET)
               
            If they could find somebody with a higher approval rating among Democrats than Bill Clinton they probably would but they can't so they won't.

            I guess Bill could act like H W Bush and cry when he's stumping for Hillary the way H W did for Jeb but that doesn't seem to be his style.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (January 25, 2008 6:25 pm ET)
                 

              Considering those here that have adamantly said NO to a Hillary vote, no matter what, come election day........I would say Bill's latest approval ratings are headed

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

               

              down here.......... 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by atheist (January 25, 2008 6:27 pm ET)
                   
                Not likely.  Some of the Obama supporters are pissed at him, but in general he is still very well liked.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (January 25, 2008 6:29 pm ET)
                     
                  I've read posts here from die hard liberals who say emphatically they will not vote for Hillary if she is the nominee......if you think they are not telling the truth, well, I think they are.  I admire them for their integrity.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Lynn (January 25, 2008 6:35 pm ET)
                     
                  ....and he's going to need those Obama supporters to win that house for his wife, he’s also going to need Edwards supporters and I’ll be surprised if Edwards does exit the race that he would endorse Hilary Clinton.  The independents don't like Hilary so they'll probably end up voting for McCain and the Republicans hate her and would just as soon shot her as vote for her. Like it or not Hilary Clinton has to maintain as much Democratic support as she can in other words she needs us disgruntled Obama supporters. So Bill better lighten up his step, that's all I know.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tommy (January 25, 2008 6:42 pm ET)
                       

                    Lynn,

                    That is the arrogance of them both, in my opinion.  They don't care how they win this nomination, who they step on, who they slime, who they destroy, or how they get it - for their options are this, 1) They win the bruising nomination and schmooze all those they plowed over to come back to the fold, minorities included, or 2) They lose the nomination and leave the party in shambles, take it down with them.....and they could care less.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by atheist (January 26, 2008 3:01 pm ET)
                         

                      Are you saying it's OK for Obama to attack Hillary, OK for him to take on big endorsements and have help with his campaign, but it's not OK for HIllary to do the same ?

                      I think you and Lynn have been so brainwashed by the Hillary bashing hype that you can't think objectively any more.  CALM DOWN !  Stop being a lemming !

                      Report Abuse
            • Author by Lynn (January 25, 2008 6:29 pm ET)
                 

              Johnny:

                We'll see where that approval rating is come November. I believe some of the support that Clinton maintained was because people were pissed that some wing nuts were attempting to overthrow the results of an election and the Dems particularly rallied around Bill Clinton and his popularity is bolstered when you compare Clinton's official performance of duties in the White House against the moron that's there now. But Clinton in my opinion is doing a lot of damage to his reputation and to the morale of some of the Democratic constituencies particular those like myself that absolutely hated the Rovian political tactics. I don’t care who uses them. They can’t afford an un-unified Democratic constituency in November. He's already driven off Pearl, I'm just waiting to see and hoping this bad behavior will stop or I won't reward these two with my precious vote come November either.

               

              Report Abuse
              • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (January 25, 2008 6:43 pm ET)
                   
                I wouldn't go as far as describing Bill Clinton's campaigning as Rovian. I'll think we'll be seeing true Rovian tactics against the Democrats once the general election campaign begins. After all, just today the McCain camp took the Kerry flip-flop ad and pasted Romney's head into it. Now that's Rovian.

                I'll tell you what I don't like.

                The past couple of days NBC's talking heads, reporters and guests have been claiming the Clintons are subtly playing the race card in order to marginalize Obama as being solely a candidate for African-American voters. This is not something either campaign is talking about but I've seen it over several days and on several shows. I think it's unfair and pure speculation.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by atheist (January 26, 2008 3:07 pm ET)
                   

                But Clinton in my opinion is doing a lot of damage to his reputation and to the morale of some of the Democratic constituencies particular those like myself that absolutely hated the Rovian political tactics.

                I think you only feel this way because you are extremely upset that your over-hyped candidate is not winning as well as you all expected after the Iowa caucuses.  Stop letting your emotions ruin your objectivity.  If Saint Obama doesn't win, don't not vote for Hillary just because you're pissed.  I've said in another thread that if Hillary doesn't win the Dem nomination I'm going to vote for Obama, even though he's not my choice of candidate.  I DO NOT WANT TO SEE ANOTHER REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT.  This should be your #1 priority, not revenge.

                If you want to see improvement, then you and the other Obama supporters should change your attitudes and boost your candidate rather than attempt to drag Hillary down, because the Hillary bashing seems to be making you all totally rabid and hyped up !  You're guy might not win, face the fact and do the right thing if that happens.  The enemy is not Hillary. 

                Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (January 25, 2008 6:42 pm ET)
           

         the former POTUS has transformed himself from a unifying, dignified world adversary for laudable charitable causes into a sniping, whining pit bull attacking politician - all in the name of getting his wife elected and both of them back in the White House.  How sad.

        Tommy, this Dem totally agrees. It's a mistake Democrats have made before, getting too nasty with each other during the primary and then trying to put the pieces back together for the general. Bill should know better.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (January 25, 2008 6:47 pm ET)
             

          You know Pearl, I have no admiration or love lost for any of the Republican candidates, they are pathetic - so I have no agenda here for getting any of them elected, but it would serve Hillary and Bill right that if she gets the nomination that many Democrats turn away from them. 

          It is happening alot in the press right now and I commend certain liberals and Democrats for their intellectual honesty in condemning the Clinton's less than stellar behavior, up until now.  My hope is they stop it, all of them, and elevate the campaign back to issues, we'd all be better off.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (January 25, 2008 6:53 pm ET)
               
            You do realize that 3/4s of this week's debate was spent on issues.

            You're also aware that almost all that was talked about in the press afterwards was the "Wal-Mart/slum lord" and "Can Bill dance" moments.

            The candidates are talking about the issues.

            However, as Bill Clinton pointed out, reporters running from one camp to the other askind "So and so just said blah blah, how do you respond" instead of asking issue oriented questions doesn't do anybody any good.

            I'm not saying the campaigns and their surrogates are blameless in this but I do see the press playing a major role here.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Lynn (January 26, 2008 12:46 am ET)
                 
              Maybe the camps as you say could just shut up. The truth is Bill Clintons started the attack on Obama right after the Iowa loss, the Clinton’s were stunned and pissed and they came out with all guns blazing. Obama correctly responded back swiftly because he couldn’t let them steam roll him and risk being portrayed as weak. That’s what they wanted. The press latched on to it because that crap sells. But if the candidates would stop it they wouldn't have anything to write about, end of story. I hope someone with moral authority that is respected in the party intervenes and quiets this down before permanent ireconcilable damage is done or we're going to lose this election for real this time. I've watched the 2000 election get stolen, I watched Rovian dirty tricks and swift boating undermine the 2004 election, but if we lose this one it's our own fault for letting power hungry people usurp what should be a shared purpose and insert their own single agenda item which is it’s HC's turn to be president. I was the first one to chastise the press for treating HC unfairly and they did treat her poorly, but the press did not start this current strife. It was initiated and has been sustained by Bill Clinton. The Press is loving it because they can sell more papers and increase ratings and the Republicans love it because #1 they want HC to be the candidate because they think they can beat her and #2 they want to see an un-united and disillusioned Democratic constituency because the Dem vote would be naturally suppressed. Moreover, it has always been my contention that the Republicans did not really want the Black vote, they knew they could never really get large numbers of Blacks to support them. What they wanted was to create a wedge between Blacks and the Democratic Party and make us stay home. I’ve always felt this, so I’m sure they’re delighted to see what’s going on and Bill Clinton has to be smart enough to recognize what’s happening. Bill’s ego might end up doing what the Republicans have been trying to do for at least 30 years. Now it wouldn’t be permanent situation but limited 2008. That would be a terrible thing and I pray that doesn’t happen. My intent is to vote for the Democratic nominee if they have played a fair game. That is my intent, but my vote will not be awarded if a candidate has offended my sense of honor. That goes for any damn body Obama. Clinton, or Edwards.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by atheist (January 26, 2008 3:15 pm ET)
                   

                OH my god Lynn, your post is so full of BS I can't even respond to all of it !

                First, Hillary was not "stunned" by Obama's win in Iowa.  He was leading in all of the polls !  And their so-called "attack" had a lot more to do with the way the media was treating Hillary than Obama's Iowa win.

                What is wrong with you Obama supporters ?  You were all gloating after Iowa and then after New Hampshire suddenly you all turned into a bunch of rabid blood-lusty attack dogs !  I'm astounded !  Why don't you stop Hillary bashing and stop feeling so sorry for yourselves and stop being so angry and start supporting your candidate in a positive way ?  It is YOU who are dragging him down, not the Clintons.

                Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (January 26, 2008 12:14 am ET)
               

            You know Pearl, I have no admiration or love lost for any of the Republican candidates, they are pathetic - so I have no agenda here for getting any of them elected, but it would serve Hillary and Bill right that if she gets the nomination that many Democrats turn away from them. 

            It is happening alot in the press right now and I commend certain liberals and Democrats for their intellectual honesty in condemning the Clinton's less than stellar behavior, up until now.  My hope is they stop it, all of them, and elevate the campaign back to issues, we'd all be better off

            Tommy I have stated quite publicly that the reason that I will NOT vote for Hillary. I'm too damn old to not vote but I can't reward her or Bill by voting for her considering their behavior. IMO that's what voting for her will be. It means that I accept what she  and Bill did just because I want to win. That's not true nor is it me, I don't want to win at any cost. I certainly don't want to win by demeaning and degrading one the the brightest Democrats to come along in a very long time. If I buy into the standard line "If you don't vote for her we will get a Republican" then IMO I'm willing to over look the last 3 weeks. Let me say here and now I'M NOT WILLING TO OVER LOOK THE LAST 3 WEEKS!!!!!

            Why would Bill & Hillary feel the need to try to destroy the brightest star to hit the Democratic party in years I don't know. My opinion, let the chips fall where they may, Bill and Hillary decided to win at any cost and I can simply say good luck, but not with my vote. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by atheist (January 26, 2008 3:26 pm ET)
                 

              Your "brightest star" was forced on us.  What has he done to deserve this title ?  He spoke at the last Dem convention ... it was a great speech, he's a great speaker, but is he a great leader ?  I don't know, he hasn't done much yet.

              You and Lynn and most other Obama supporters I've seen are SO pissed that his nomination is threatened that instead of thinking logically and looking at the big picture, you are planning to seek revenge.  If Obama loses, you are going to blame the Clintons for his loss ... but what about all of the people who voted ?  Aren't they responsible ?  Are you planning to seek revenge on them too ?

              I've never seen such a bunch of sore potential losers in my entire life !

              Plus I still cannot understand why a half-white guy is claimed by blacks as their own.  The best explanation that I've gotten from anyone is that he looks black.  Is this sufficient ?  Blacks will be excited to see a guy who looks black becoming President ?  Can the whites call Obama white because he's half-white ?  

              Report Abuse
    • Author by atheist (January 25, 2008 6:25 pm ET)
         
      I personally think that the comment was a veiled insult directed at the Clintons, but it's super stinky for CNN to use it as if it were made very recently !
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • CNN
    CNN
    One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
    Phone: 404-827-1500
    Fax: 404-827-1906
  • Wolf Blitzer
    Wolf Blitzer