About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NY Times failed to note Giustra reportedly involved in Kazakhstan mining deals more than a decade ago

January 31, 2008 8:42 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: In an article about former President Bill Clinton's September 2005 trip to Kazakhstan with Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra, The New York Times suggested that Giustra was able to secure agreements giving his company the right to buy into Kazakh mining projects because of his connection to Clinton. The Times did not note that Giustra was reportedly involved in Kazakh mining deals more than a decade ago.

20 Comments

In a January 31 New York Times article reporting on former President Bill Clinton's September 2005 trip to Kazakhstan with Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra, staff writers Jo Becker and Don Van Natta Jr. reported that "[w]ithin two days, corporate records show that Mr. Giustra also came up a winner when his company signed preliminary agreements giving it the right to buy into three uranium projects controlled by Kazakhstan's state-owned uranium agency, Kazatomprom." Throughout the article, the Times suggested that Giustra would not have been able to win the agreements without his connection to Clinton. For instance, the article stated in its second paragraph: "Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton." At no point in the article, however, did the Times note that Giustra was reportedly involved in Kazakh mining deals at least as far back as the mid-1990s, undermining the article's suggestion that Giustra needed to tap his Clinton connection to do business in Kazakhstan.

The May 31, 1996, edition of The Financial Post (Canada) identified Giustra as Yorkton Securities' "chief executive." According to the May 2, 1996, edition of The Financial Post, Yorkton Securities was the "sole underwriter of KazMinCo's [Kazakhstan Minerals Corp.] recent US$23.5-million financing." The January 19, 1996, edition of The Globe and Mail (Canada) reported that Kazakhstan Minerals Corp. "is redrilling the Samarskoye copper and gold mineral deposit [in central Kazakhstan], which was extensively explored by state geologists of the former Soviet Union." The article further reported: "In total, the company has seven joint-venture agreements with private companies. Five drilling rigs are operating at Samarskoye and 11 others are operating at its other projects in the country."

Moreover, a September 4, 1995, article in Maclean's (Toronto edition) reported that Tony Williams, the head of Yorkton's London office, was "in the process of putting a complicated but potentially promising gold-mining deal together deep in the heart of Kazakhstan, one of the more obscure former Soviet republics." Williams subsequently became chairman of Kazakhstan Minerals Corp., according to the May 2, 1996, Financial Post.

The Times did report that Giustra had previously invested in gold mines in "Argentina, Australia and Mexico" but neglected to mention Giustra's reported previous involvement in Kazakh mining deals in the 1990s.

From the January 31 New York Times article:

Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton.

[...]

Within two days, corporate records show that Mr. Giustra also came up a winner when his company signed preliminary agreements giving it the right to buy into three uranium projects controlled by Kazakhstan's state-owned uranium agency, Kazatomprom.

The monster deal stunned the mining industry, turning an unknown shell company into one of the world's largest uranium producers in a transaction ultimately worth tens of millions of dollars to Mr. Giustra, analysts said.

[...]

A spokesman for Mr. Clinton said the former president knew that Mr. Giustra had mining interests in Kazakhstan but was unaware of "any particular efforts" and did nothing to help. Mr. Giustra said he was there as an "observer only" and there was "no discussion" of the deal with Mr. Nazarbayev or Mr. Clinton.

But Moukhtar Dzhakishev, president of Kazatomprom, said in an interview that Mr. Giustra did discuss it, directly with the Kazakh president, and that his friendship with Mr. Clinton "of course made an impression." Mr. Dzhakishev added that Kazatomprom chose to form a partnership with Mr. Giustra's company based solely on the merits of its offer.

After The Times told Mr. Giustra that others said he had discussed the deal with Mr. Nazarbayev, Mr. Giustra responded that he "may well have mentioned my general interest in the Kazakhstan mining business to him, but I did not discuss the ongoing" efforts.

[...]

Mr. Giustra foresaw a bull market in gold and began investing in mines in Argentina, Australia and Mexico. He turned a $20 million shell company into a powerhouse that, after a $2.4 billion merger with Goldcorp Inc., became Canada's second-largest gold company.

[...]

Exploding demand for energy had helped revitalize the nuclear power industry, and uranium, the raw material for reactor fuel, was about to become a hot commodity. In late 2004, Mr. Giustra began talking to investors, and put together a company that would eventually be called UrAsia Energy Ltd.

Kazakhstan, which has about one-fifth of the world's uranium reserves, was the place to be. But with plenty of suitors, Kazatomprom could be picky about its partners.

"Everyone was asking Kazatomprom to the dance," said Fadi Shadid, a senior stock analyst covering the uranium industry for Friedman Billings Ramsey, an investment bank. "A second-tier junior player like UrAsia -- you'd need all the help you could get."

[...]

Longtime market watchers were confounded. Kazatomprom's choice of UrAsia was a "mystery," said Gene Clark, the chief executive of Trade Tech, a uranium industry newsletter.

"UrAsia was able to jump-start the whole process somehow," Mr. Clark said. The company became a "major uranium producer when it didn't even exist before."

From the May 2, 1996, edition of The Financial Post:

Kazakhstan is a bit of an enigma in the mining world. Investors can't decide whether the mineral-rich former Soviet republic represents a golden opportunity, or spells risk with a capital 'k.'

Kazakhstan Minerals Corp., which made its debut on the Toronto Stock Exchange this week, could prove to be a good test case of the country's attractiveness as a place to invest Western mining capital.

KazMinCo has a 49% to 50% interest in one silver and eight gold/copper properties, all of which are in advanced stages of exploration. The company says it expects to have four world-class projects in operation within three years.

''Several of the deposits are absolute world leaders,'' says mining analyst Bruce Reid of Yorkton Securities Inc. Yorkton, which was the sole underwriter of KazMinCo's recent US$23.5-million financing, estimates the company's share of the total resource on all properties to be 4.5 million ounces of gold and 6.7 billion pounds of copper, and growing.

KazMinCo was packaged last fall out of a Yukon-based shell and made a splash when its shares began trading over the counter on the Canadian Dealing Network (KMCO/CDN). The shares quickly climbed from US$3.50 to the US$9 range and held that level until yearend.

From the January 19, 1996, edition of The Globe and Mail:

The market capitalization of Kazakhstan Minerals Corp. has soared on the Canadian Dealing Network to $331-million (U.S.) as the shares put on yet another spurt, rising $2.50 yesterday to $11.25 after the release of what one investment dealer described as "spectacular" results.

The London-based, Canadian-incorporated company is redrilling the Samarskoye copper and gold mineral deposit, which was extensively explored by state geologists of the former Soviet Union.

The deposit is in central Kazakhstan, the central Asian country that already ranks seventh in world copper production. It is estimated to contain 2.1 million ounces of gold and 1.5 million tonnes of copper based on those earlier studies.

It is just one of nine properties that have been assembled by Kazakhstan Minerals, which raised $25-million last month to finance the exploration. That could rise by another $25-million if outstanding warrants are exercised.

Over all, Kazakhstan Minerals' share of those properties is about 3.3-billion pounds of copper and 4.5 million ounces of gold, according to the Soviet estimates. Copper traded yesterday at $1.18 a pound and gold at $397.40 an ounce.

In total, the company has seven joint-venture agreements with private companies. Five drilling rigs are operating at Samarskoye and 11 others are operating at its other projects in the country.

From the September 4, 1995, edition of Maclean's:

Ever since the Big Six banks absorbed the country's major investment houses, the few remaining independents have struggled to find a new mandate for themselves. Some have become boutique operations, catering to garlands of wealthy clients others -- like Bay Street's Gordon Capital -- have specialized in block trades, while a few -- such as Richardson Greenshields -- have stayed alive by relying on their retail networks.

But faced with the undiminished clout of the bank-run institutions that now dominate stock trades, most of the remaining independents have moved to occupy niche markets, none more successfully than Vancouver's Yorkton Securities Inc., which has become the country's leading financial facilitator of the world's burgeoning mining industry. Yorkton, which is nominally headquartered in Toronto, is really run out of its Vancouver office, which houses the bulk of its 400 employees. The firm is currently financing the hunt for ''elephant-size'' mineral deposits in 35 countries, mainly though its overseas offices in Zurich, London, Paris and Santiago, Chile. Yorkton's Chairman Frank Giustra is based in Vancouver but, while he admires the Vancouver Stock Exchange as a source of venture capital, he has conscientiously stayed away from its seamier aspects. ''The problem,'' he told me in an interview last week, ''is not so much with policing its operations as with the way some brokerage companies conduct themselves. If they didn't allow questionable types of business to be transacted on the VSE, it wouldn't be there. It's as simple as that.''

[...]

While Giustra heads Yorkton, none of the 75 shareholders (including Giustra) owns more than 10 percent of its shares. A good many of those are geologists, accountants, economists and corporate finance specialists who spend their professional lives earning for Yorkton what the firm's chairman describes as ''our franchise as the brokerage world's best and largest natural resource group.'' Instead of waiting around for prospectors to arrive with big dreams and small claims, the Yorkton operatives dispatch due diligence teams to some pretty obscure corners, searching for new mines. ''Just once,'' complains Giustra, ''just once, I wish somebody would discover a deposit in Tuscany or the French Riviera. We seem to be always finding mines in the most bizarre places.'' Tony Williams, the capable geologist who heads Yorkton's London office, for example, is in the process of putting a complicated but potentially promising gold-mining deal together deep in the heart of Kazakhstan, one of the more obscure former Soviet republics.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (January 31, 2008 9:28 pm ET)
         
      whitewater redux.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The Stranger (January 31, 2008 9:57 pm ET)
           

        Both Clintons should be in jail over Whitewater. Give me a synopsis of what you think the deatils are. I'll bet you have no clue.

        I'll give you a hint. There's a lot more to the story than the two hillbillys losing money...

        ..think Rose Law firm...missing billing records...Susan McDougal refusing to testify..Beverly Basset Schaffer...madison Guaranty bailout..the search of Vince Foster's office after the low rent hillbillys had him killed..

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mefirst (January 31, 2008 10:12 pm ET)
             
          think 70 million dollars by two prosecuters and nothing but a blue dress to show for it.  rave on.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (February 01, 2008 10:03 am ET)
             
          Here's a Proposition for you, Stranger to Truth... we'll reopen the Whitewater case if we can put an equal amount of investigative effort into the manipulation of the WMD intelligence leading up to the Iraq invasion, as well as Cheney's backroom deals with the Oil companies and Halliburton and Blackwater. Oh, and a really intense look at the corruption in the Justice Department under Bush...and the probable illegal destruction of White House e-mails.

          Deal?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mefirst (February 01, 2008 9:23 pm ET)
               
            notice how a lot of those "missing" e-mails were right around the time that the valerie plame outing became news.  of course, outing a cia agent and destroying her spy network is no problem, in a world where a tip could stop an attack.  especially after you send the press secretary out to deny anyone at the white house was involved.   and then when rove leaves last year, bush is gushing over what a great guy good ol karl is.  way to help out them terrorists, guys.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by friedbergboy1422 (February 01, 2008 10:13 am ET)
             

          How is this for a conspiracy....

          The President refuses to testify under oath and won't testify without his vice-president.   The President does all he can to sabotage  the 9/11 Commission and then implements almost none of their recommendations.  Is that scandal worth $70 million to investigate?  If not, what about this one:

          The President keeps warning the American people that if they don't go to war a mushroom cloud could happen in one of their cities.  We take advice from a known drunk who calls him or herself "Curveball"  3,943 U.S. soldiers killed, 135 commit suicide, 28,770 wounded in a war over WMD's that haven't been located and may never have existed.  Does that warrant a $70 million dollar investment?  Why don't you feel as passionately about getting the President to testify on this one?  If in the buildup to the war (if there was an investigation), Bush had an affair, would you want him to testify about that or the war?

          Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (February 01, 2008 10:21 am ET)
             
          Oh, I almost missed douchebag's reference to Vince Foster. Here's another deal Strangler.... I'll prove that Vince Foster committed suicide if you can prove that Flight 93 crashed where they said it did.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (January 31, 2008 10:20 pm ET)
         

      How is this part of the change that Mrs. Clinton will bring to Washington?  Influence peddling? 

      Only difference this time is that brother Rodham not part of any pre-pardon exchange of money.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (February 01, 2008 10:15 am ET)
           
        Influence peddling? Like that Hunt Oil deal with the Kurds? Gee, that story sure came and went in a hurry. I guess the "Liberal Media" didn't find it interesting enough.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (January 31, 2008 10:53 pm ET)
         
      Can't wait till he discovers Whitewater.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 01, 2008 12:57 am ET)
           

        Seems like every time I turn on the am (GOP) radio, one of the wingnuts is reading from the "Liberal NY Times", and not to cite a liberal bias , but a "surprising" conservative pile. Usually preceded by "Would you believe, the NY Times", or "From the NY Times, of all places".

        Somehow, the media has convinced the most easily manipulated part of the country that this paper is a left wing organ, while never providing any evidence of it, but showing daily aberrations supporting the GOP.

        And it actually works on a few people (no offense, Strangy and Loudcon)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (February 01, 2008 10:10 am ET)
             
          "the most easily manipulated part of the country"

          Otherwise known as the GOP base. The knuckledragging 30 percenters.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (February 01, 2008 8:50 am ET)
         

      Stranger, Using your ConLogic...i must gather from your post that Ken Starr was really a liberal plant or a stupid Conservative? Which is it?

      P.S. They have books on the subjects you mentioned from both sides of the aisle. So turn-off Rush a/k/a the CRYBABY, and try reading real books. And by the way, I always hope you find endup IN PARADISE.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (February 01, 2008 10:08 am ET)
         
      This is nonsense. The current occupant of the White House and his puppeteer are so corrupt and dishonest that they make Bill Clinton look like a cub scout. The fact that Puddinhead George is not getting reamed every day in the press pretty much proves that Liberal Media Bias exists only in the imagination of GOP Talk Radio Troglodytes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (February 01, 2008 10:51 am ET)
         
      Lest we forget...I'd just like for Mr. Bush to let us know where he was in Alabama during his service years...hell, we have an AWOL Alcoholic as Commander-in-Chief. No wonder it took 5 years to get things right..well, almost right. Damn suicide bombers, or should I say FEMALE suicide bombers..what the hell is the difference, they are ruining this surge thing.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lostlogic (February 01, 2008 11:24 am ET)
         
      I may be missing the problem here but I just don't see what is scandolous about this trip.  Even if every inuendo did turn out to be correct...so what.  I don't see the conflict at that time.  Whether Clinton actually networked his influence or just being seen in his company gave the man extra cache I don't see where the issue is.  It seems things have become so silly that even talk of a common association becomes without reason front page worthy scandal. 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (February 01, 2008 11:49 am ET)
           
        Of course, you're right. This is just residue from the Cottage Industry of manufacturing Clinton scandals that made people like Rush Limbaugh filthy rich in the 90s.

        Any day now, they'll start mentioning the Lincoln Bedroom. The truth is that all politicians, especially presidents, play this game. Maybe we should investigate Rush Limbaugh's stay in the Lincoln Bedroom, after which his show became a 15 hour per week infomercial for the GOP. Maybe there are some campaign finance violations in there somewhere...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by atheist (February 01, 2008 1:54 pm ET)
           
        This is like today's manufactured story about Hillary's campaign co-chair Antonio Villaraigosa accepting donations from Tony Rezko.  The headlines and sound bites make it sound like he accepted the donations for Hillary's campaign.  Turns out he accepted them for his own mayoral bids, in 2001 and 2003.  A total of $1500.  I wonder who's behind this story ??? 
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Eureka Springs (February 01, 2008 4:20 pm ET)
         
      I understand the intention of this article is to provide fact checking in particular on Mr. Giustra. That said, the article certainly raises far more important questions. I for one don't want Bill Clinton running around the globe helping spread uranium. I also appreciate any news about the ongoing wild west spree for natural resources in the region. I believe much of the reason US Forces are fighting in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iraq are due to natural recources in the Caspian Sea region.. All three countries include exit routes for pipelines/shipping to the rest of the world. So does parts of Iran, unfortunately.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.