About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Print press repeats media mantra of McCain as "maverick"

February 07, 2008 4:42 pm ET

SUMMARY: Numerous print publications -- including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times -- continued a longstanding practice of referring to Sen. John McCain as a "maverick" in their coverage of the February 5 presidential primaries and caucuses.

41 Comments

In covering the results of the February 5 presidential primaries and caucuses, numerous print publications continued a longstanding practice of referring to Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (AZ) as a "maverick" who has challenged Washington and his own party, despite a lifetime rating of 83 by the American Conservative Union and his recent rightward shift on high-profile issues such as immigration and taxes.

In their February 6 coverage, the following print publications all used the word "maverick" in reference to McCain:

  • An Associated Press article stated that McCain "has appealed strongly to independent voters with his image as a maverick ready to work outside strict party lines." (The AP article did report: "McCain was a lead sponsor last year of the failed compromise bill, backed by President Bush and most Democrats, that would have tightened border security while also allowing illegal immigrants a pathway toward citizenship. During the campaign, as McCain sought support from GOP conservatives, he has stressed that border security would be his first priority, while his Democratic rivals continued to advocate a comprehensive approach.")*
  • The New York Times reported: "This week, as Mr. McCain grew more confident of winning, the maverick who had long defied and exasperated his party began promoting himself as a true conservative who could unify Republicans for the fight in November."
  • An article in The Washington Post described McCain as "a former prisoner of war in Vietnam who has carved out a career as a blunt-talking maverick on Capitol Hill."
  • The Los Angeles Times noted former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's attempts to gain on McCain by writing: "For weeks, Romney has been casting McCain as a Washington insider, despite the senator's maverick reputation." In a separate article on the same day, the Times reported that a voter who liked California Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger "chose McCain because his maverick, moderate political style is most similar to the governor's."
  • The Chicago Tribune reported: "Romney also sought to benefit from prominent conservative talk show hosts who repeatedly used their media outlets to blast McCain's maverick status as no friend of the Republican right." Further, an editorial in the Tribune headlined "The McCain Surge" listed several reasons why McCain couldn't win the Republican nomination, with one reason being: "He'd spent a Senate career being too much the maverick. He was often disloyal to his party -- and more often a prickly and righteous annoyance to his colleagues."
  • The Philadelphia Inquirer asserted: "[T]he senator from Arizona emerged with unresolved problems on his right flank, as he tries to persuade conservative opinion leaders that they have little to fear from his maverick tendencies and willingness to work with Democrats."
  • The Dallas Morning News reported that when he addressed his supporters after his February 5 primary victories, "Mr. McCain also reached beyond to the conservative and evangelical base of his party, many of whom have criticized the maverick GOP senator."
  • An editorial in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch stated: "The maverick Mr. McCain is the leader, but only because the party's conservative base is badly split."
  • A Salt Lake Tribune editorial asserted: "[I]t is impossible to imagine the evangelical base of the party coming out strongly for the maverick McCain in November."
  • In his New York Sun column, Nicholas Wapshott compared McCain to former President Ronald Reagan, writing: "[T]he maverick senator from Arizona was as likeable and as authentic as Reagan, someone who didn't need a poll or a focus group or a finger in the wind to decide where he stood on an issue."

Media Matters for America has also documented the broadcast media's habit of using the label of "maverick" when discussing McCain.

* The original version of this item omitted the AP's reference to McCain's change on immigration. Media Matters regrets the omission.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 07, 2008 4:44 pm ET)
         
      Well, at least they're not calling him America's Maverick...  ;>)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by thomp.steve9098 (February 07, 2008 4:49 pm ET)
           
        I like the ring of that, especially with our nation's mayor already campaigning for him.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (February 08, 2008 12:13 pm ET)
           

        I wonder why McCain doesn't just abandon the Republicans, form the "MAVERICK" party, and get Joe Lieberman as his running mate?

        The MAVERICKS, those wild and crazy guys whose ideas don't conform with conventional definition, would then be appealing to the American People as "GUYS WITH NO REAL PRINCIPLES" ... or rather, "GUYS WITHOUT IDEOLOGICAL UNDERPINNINGS." Their "principles" follow a different, perhaps unknowable calculus.

        MAVERICKS are like a box of chocolates ... you never know WHAT you're going to get. But if you VOTE for them, you'll get exactly what you deserve! The entire nation will know what it feels like to be piloting a small airplane and have the cable snap that controls the rudder. You don't know where you might be going, but eventually it will be DOWN.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by thomp.steve9098 (February 08, 2008 1:05 pm ET)
             

          The Dem's already tried to get America's Maverick to abandon the repubs. Didn't Kerry try to get him as running mate?

          Report Abuse
    • Author by pointofview (February 07, 2008 4:46 pm ET)
         
      The media still refers to Hillary as a woman, so what is the problem?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (February 07, 2008 4:48 pm ET)
         

      McCain is no Maverick, Obama is no second coming of JFK.

      The media creates this nonsense & no matter how infuriating it is to have to keep hearing or reading this stuff. I think we're stuck with it.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (February 07, 2008 4:55 pm ET)
           
        You're right Jeter, we are stuck with it. It's as meaningless anymore as it is harmless.  Aren't there bigger fish to fry out there besides this label obsession?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Governor (February 07, 2008 4:58 pm ET)
             
          Media should report, not market.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by watershed (February 07, 2008 5:40 pm ET)
               

            Of course the media should not market a candidate. Putting forward a constant false premise of McCain as a "maverick" when he is just the opposite influences voters impressions of him, and yes, sways votes.

            Anyone who says otherwise is being purposefully disingenuous. But that's a constant problem here, the ostensibly clever poster suddenly "not getting it".

            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (February 07, 2008 6:01 pm ET)
                 

              What we get is the office frenzy among the staffers here, and shared by many posters, every time some media person dares utter the name "maverick" in connection with John McCain. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by watershed (February 07, 2008 6:26 pm ET)
                   

                You surely know what media bias is and it's influence on a media soaked populace, Tommy, why do you constantly pretend that it makes no difference?

                It's such an obvious game. I just don't know why you're playing it.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by tex (February 08, 2008 12:27 pm ET)
                     

                  WATERSHED:

                  If you remember the film, "The Wizard of OZ", there was the final scene where Dorothy had accomplished the task of obtaining the broom of the Wicked Witch of the West, and was demanding that the Wizard fulfill his promises to her and her friends.

                  Todo, the dog, discovers a curtain, and pulls it aside, exposing an old man frantically working the mechanisms that gave a BOOMING VOICE and FRIGHTFUL IMAGES to the Wizard the public saw, a created and fraudulent IMAGE that kept the Wizard "IN POWER".

                  "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!" Booms the IMAGE of the Wizard.

                  That PHONY IMAGE of a powerful leader, the loud proclamations that FOOL the public into belief ... that's today's MEDIA.

                  The person saying "Pay no attention" ... is TOMMY.

                  If we pay attention to the phonyness and deceptions perpetrated by the MEDIA (our "Wizard"), then the game is up.

                  Tommy wishes to close the curtain, allowing the fraud of the Wizard to continue.

                  Hope this helps explain why Tommy behaves as he does. 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by foghornleghorn (February 08, 2008 1:12 pm ET)
                       

                    To put it another way, Tommy is smart enough to realize when the media forwards misinformation.  The problem is that a large percentage of the citizenry doesn't have the time/access to realize they are being misinformed.

                     

                    Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 07, 2008 5:02 pm ET)
           
        I will be darned, I like your post
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 07, 2008 5:00 pm ET)
         
      I have come to the conclusion the media pundits, specially on cable news (?) use the word ' maveric " as a substitute for flip-flopper, something Mr McCain finds politically appealing.  And speaking of flip-flopping, I'd give the GOP mouthpuieces about two months until they embrace McCaing, after being so vociferous about voting for Hillary before voting for McCain. this sounds like fun.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 07, 2008 5:05 pm ET)
           
        They never called John Kerry a maverick... But what kills me is that what is suggested is that John McCain is the maverick of Washington, DC...not just a run of the mill maverick.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by antoine825903 (February 09, 2008 9:09 am ET)
             
          wouldn't joe lieberman be a pretty good candidate for the whole "maveric" mantle - given his staunch position on the war against the greater wisdom of his party, among other things?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by thomp.steve9098 (February 07, 2008 5:06 pm ET)
           
        Not sure about that for some of those guys. As noted before on some other thread, limbaugh, hannity, coulter and others in their crew would love a dem in the white house, especially if it's HC. The careers of hannity and limbaugh blossomed during the clinton administration, and they'd happily await the chance to have Bill back in the spotlight.  Ratings, ratings, ratings. . ..
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (February 07, 2008 5:10 pm ET)
             

          Exactly, there would be a mad dash towards conservative talk radio if a Democrat gets elected in November.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Governor (February 07, 2008 5:13 pm ET)
             
          Exactly, they don't actually believe what they say.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by thomp.steve9098 (February 07, 2008 5:14 pm ET)
               
            They believe half of what they say, because I think they mean it when expressing their disdain for the Clintons.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Governor (February 07, 2008 5:19 pm ET)
                 
              Perhaps, but they don't seethe over the bag of money.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (February 07, 2008 5:20 pm ET)
                 
              Their disdain for the Clintons is trumped by their fondness for their relevance.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by thomp.steve9098 (February 07, 2008 5:25 pm ET)
                   

                You're right. Say the Mav wins, what's limbaugh gonna do, join the leftwing and bash him for four years, or would he defend some guy he despises? He'd be in a pickle. Joining the chorus from the left certainly will alienate his listeners.  But I think his hatred for Mav runs deep, and that big-headed dope would have a hard time pretending he likes the fellow. Dopes like him want a straight message, like someone or hate him/her.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (February 07, 2008 5:35 pm ET)
                     

                  "But I think his hatred for Mav runs deep, and that big-headed dope would have a hard time pretending he likes the fellow."

                  I doubt it.  Remember, Limbaugh told everyone that he was relieved after the '06 elections because he wouldn't have to carry water for people who didn't deserve it anymore (or similar phrasing).  Either he was pretending when he said that or he was pretending throughout Republican rule of Congress.  I think it's easy to act when you have no investment in the honesty of your own words, only the desired result. 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by thomp.steve9098 (February 07, 2008 5:38 pm ET)
                       
                    Perhaps you're correct. We'll find out soon, now that Romney's out . . .
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by nerzog (February 07, 2008 5:40 pm ET)
                       
                    Exactly. Rush is a liar and a profound hypocrite. He only gets away with it because his sycophantic audience worships him.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by ultrasanktpauli (February 08, 2008 1:01 am ET)
                     
                  'the mav'

                  holy smokes. maybe he could get a big 'M' on his shirt...and a cape. that would be cool!
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by tex (February 08, 2008 12:39 pm ET)
                       

                    Actully, the current Adminstration has a great deal of accouterment and paraphernalia  emblazened with  "W"s.

                    All that material would work just fine for "M for MAVERICK" ... provided McCain learned to stand on his head ... ass over teakettle, as it were.

                    And, hell, that's the way he's RUNNING for OFFICE, so he should be able to use all of "W's" old flight suits and boots and what-have-you! And what better image for a "Maverick", standing on his head while all others are following the tired old practice of standing upright on their feet?

                    Report Abuse
              • Author by nerzog (February 07, 2008 5:38 pm ET)
                   
                You have a point, there. In fact, that is exactly what Glenn Beck was ranting about on his radio show yesterday. He was mortified at the prospect that Conservative Talk Radio was now irrelevant.

                With this in mind, I think they'll soften their attacks on McCain, and maybe even support him by the time November rolls around, even if they secretly hope for a Democratic win. Rush left the door open today, saying that McCain would have to exhibit "leadership" to win back Conservative support. I believe that most of the Republican base will finally cave in to the jingoistic rhetoric and appeal for party unity. The Talk Radio Screechers can't afford to alienate their audience, so they'll come around, too.

                Or, maybe I'm wrong... Maybe Rush and Sean and Glenn will put their Conservative "values" above all else and abandon the Republican party.... but I doubt it.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (February 07, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
         
      Think there's more than disdain involved. Idiological filters once adopted for fun and games have now been in place so long that they cannot be removed. Or differentiated from the original  personality. Lotta people define themselves by what they hate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dazedandconfused26 (February 07, 2008 6:45 pm ET)
         

      Even if Rush doesn't do a 180 on McCain he already covered his back. He's been spouting for weeks how it was the liberal media supporting McCain even though he's really a liberal. So know that McCain is going to get the nod he can still claim the liberals hijacked his party. He will be the hero fighting to take back his party blah..blah... I mean he went off for twenty minutes last week about if anyone is a Maverick its him, not John McCain, whatever.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (February 08, 2008 10:22 am ET)
           
        Despite their whining for a "leader", the Troglodytes will browbeat McCain until he crawls in the dirt and kisses their collective ass, because they know he can't win without the Theofascist vote. Once he has been sufficiently humbled, they will vote for him. I even believe Limbaugh and his fellow Professional Liars will suddenly discover McCain's redeeming qualities, and carry the GOP's water.... as they always do.

        I've had zero respect for McCain ever since this little scene:

        http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/R/e/1/mccain_bush_hug.jpg

        The Religious Right Troglodytes will pitch a hissy fit and threaten to take their toys and go home unless McCain bends over and grabs his ankles. He will grovel before them like a whipped puppy, even though it was Moderates and Independents who gave him the nomination.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (February 08, 2008 10:56 am ET)
             

          Hey, Nerzog, that doesn't sound too unlikely. Several of us were tossing out theories on a thread the other day, as to how the righty talkers were going to "come around" to McCain.

          Will Rush decide that the Maverick/Gremlin's "liberal" act was a canny ploy to the center? Will the true con come out later? Is the GOP base throwing the election in order to deliberately put the Dems in charge of the current mess? Who knows?

          I tuned in Rush yesterday, and I think I got a hint of his plan too. Of course, El Rushbo never admits to being wrong, so what I heard him saying is that McCain will realize how far he is from the principles of "Real Americans" (i.e., the ever -dwindling- throiugh -education -and -natural-death extreme right minority that Rush imagines is still vital) and metamorphose into a genuine knuckledragging Bible thumping wingnut.

          So I guess that no matter what McCain does in the next few months, Rush and his clones will explain to their audience that he really is a con, and, yes, they are not part of an endangered species of bed-wetting, paranoid extremists.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (February 08, 2008 11:44 am ET)
               
            I think you're on to something. I heard part of Rush's show, and I think he left himself an out. He said that, if McCain wanted Conservative support, he'd have to be a "leader". Of course, that can mean anything they want it to, (sort of like "victory" in Iraq.) In essence, it will mean bending to the will of the Biblehumping Troglodytes and paying lip service to their pet issues. Judging by past performance, I think McCain will be more than happy to do that.

            Once he says the right things, they'll swarm to him like flies to a steaming fresh cow pile. His past heresies will be forgotten. After all, their chosen one, Romney, was just as liberal as McCain ever was before he started pandering to the Neanderthals. They'll forgive McCain, after they piss and moan for an appropriate period of time.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by RINO Hunter (February 08, 2008 1:39 pm ET)
                 
              So what exactly are the neanderthals? Are they kind of similar to the socialist moon bats on the left?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by nerzog (February 08, 2008 2:07 pm ET)
                   
                They're the ones who think George Bush was sent by God to usher in Armageddon and pave the way for the return of Jeeeeeeezzzzzzuuuuussssssss. They're the ones who want Creation Myths taught in Public School science classes. They're the ones who think our laws are based on the Ten Commandments. They're the ones who think that God's law supercedes our Constitution. They're the ones who think Separation of Church and State is a myth invented by the Communists to piss off REAL Americans.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by RINO Hunter (February 08, 2008 8:54 pm ET)
                     
                  Hmmm. I've never met anybody who has those views. Maybe I will one day.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by goatsage (February 07, 2008 7:12 pm ET)
         
      Solution: Call them out on it! Every time you see a MSM reference to "maverick" McCain shoot the author an e-mall and question their lack of originality and ask whether they have been prompted to use the term by their superiors or if they are just lazy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RINO Hunter (February 08, 2008 1:41 pm ET)
         

      "Maverick" may not be an accurate term for McCain. All of his major bills are with Democrats and not Republicans. In order to be a maverick he would have to write major bills with both Republicans and Democrats. "Liberal" is probably a more accurate term.

      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.