CNN's Sesno suggests McCain owns copyright on "straight talk" label
SUMMARY: Referring to the Democratic presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama, CNN's Frank Sesno said: "[M]oney is pouring in, but with apologies to [Sen.] John McCain, you might hear some straight talk, too." In assigning McCain ownership of the "straight talk" label, Sesno joined a long line of media, including CNN hosts and correspondents, who have adopted McCain's self-laudatory label of "straight-talker" despite his stark inconsistency on numerous issues.
On the February 8 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, special correspondent Frank Sesno said of Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) presidential campaign: "[M]oney is pouring in, but with apologies to [Sen.] John McCain [R-AZ], you might hear some straight talk, too. Excitement doesn't necessarily equal victory." In assigning McCain ownership of the "straight talk" label, Sesno joined a long line of media, including CNN hosts and correspondents, who have adopted McCain's self-laudatory label of "straight-talker" despite his stark inconsistency on numerous issues, including the Iraq war, immigration, and tax cuts. McCain has also repeatedly claimed that he called for former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's resignation. In fact, while McCain expressed "no confidence" in Rumsfeld in 2004, the Associated Press reported at the time that McCain "said his comments were not a call for Rumsfeld's resignation." Further, when Fox News host Shepherd Smith specifically asked McCain, "Does Donald Rumsfeld need to step down?" on November 8, 2006 -- hours before Bush announced Rumsfeld's resignation -- McCain responded that it was "a decision to be made by the president."
Following are examples of CNN personalities referring to McCain's purported "straight talk":
- On the January 27 edition of CNN's Late Edition, after host Wolf Blitzer aired a C-SPAN clip of McCain's mother, Roberta McCain, saying she did not think her son "has any" support among the Republican base, senior political analyst Gloria Borger said: "[N]ow we know where McCain gets all the straight talk from. We think it's his mother." Both Borger and Blitzer went on to refer to McCain as a "maverick." Borger commented that McCain's mother is "telling the truth. The base of the Republican Party has never been enamored of John McCain."
- On the August 29, 2007, edition of The Situation Room, while discussing an earlier interview by CNN senior national correspondent John King with McCain, Blitzer said to King: "There was some straight talk from the Straight Talk Express," the latter being the name of McCain's campaign bus. Blitzer added that, although McCain "dodged some of your questions ... he also was pretty candid when it came to a very sensitive subject -- the future of Senator Larry Craig [R-ID]." But neither Blitzer nor King explained what made calling for Craig's resignation "straight talk" given that, in the days after the first reports of Craig's guilty plea on misdemeanor disorderly conduct charges, Republicans such as Sen. Norm Coleman (MN) and Rep. Pete Hoekstra (MI) had also called on Craig to resign.
- On the May 21, 2007, edition of The Situation Room, correspondent Tom Foreman reported that McCain "became famous for his straight talk during his first run for the White House." But in touting McCain's purported "straight talk" during his unsuccessful 2000 presidential campaign, Foreman ignored McCain's admission that, regarding the issue of the Confederate flag, he had "broke[n] [his] promise to always tell the truth" in order to "win the South Carolina primary."
- On the January 15, 2007, edition of The Situation Room, Blitzer teased a report on Focus on the Family chairman James Dobson's statement that he "would not vote for John McCain under any circumstances" by claiming that "Senator John McCain likes straight talk."
Media Matters for America also documented numerous instances in which CNN personalities have referred to McCain as a "maverick."
From the February 8 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
SESNO: What if you could be a fly on the wall at Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama campaign headquarters? What if you could hear what they're really saying about the campaign, their strategy, and their prospects? We know what they're saying in public: Clinton says it's going fine.
CLINTON: We are very pleased about where the campaign is and how --
SESNO: But if you were a fly on the wall, you'd hear another side. At Hillary's shop, you might see them dump the decaf. They've got to work around the clock now. This campaign has gone from inevitable to inexorable. You might see the bills piling up for travel and polling and media and salaries.
What if you could have been there when Hillary tossed in $5 million of her own, and some of the staff volunteered to go a month without pay? That must have been fun. They're already back on the payroll. Then there's Barack. Publicly, it's all about momentum.
OBAMA: Yes, we can. Yes, we can.
SESNO: And money is pouring in, but with apologies to John McCain, you might hear some straight talk, too. Excitement doesn't necessarily equal victory. New Hampshire showed that a month ago, and Super Tuesday voters who made up their minds at the very last minute tended toward Hillary. And the race card is still a wild card.
What if you were a fly on the wall inside these campaigns? You'd see laser-like focus now on the maps and the delegates. Where to deploy the candidates and the media buys? You'd see calculations about some basic divisions in the Democratic Party: age, race, and gender. And you'd see plenty of mood swings.















I have a theory...that after Bush/rove smeared McCain & family in South Carolina, that McCain made a deal with these ghastly sub-humans that he would support Bush on certain issues and support his re-election--and then the Bush machine would see that he got the Republican nomination in '08.
I could be totally wrong about this, but it seems pretty clear that McCain has rolled over for Bush numerous times since then, and envisions a continuation of the neocon nightmare.
I didn't bother to discuss the "straight talk" idiocy, since it's doubtful that anyone here believes it.
On a related topic, does ANYONE think it's a coincidence that they've suddenly decided to put the so-called 9/11 conspirators on trial while there's an election going on? Please. What better way to remind the hand-wringing 30 percenters that there are evil towelheads out there who want to kill us, lest they forget to be afraid?
Hey Nerzog you might find this interesting:
On Friday, a day after Karl Rove donated $2300 to John McCain's campaign, McCain (R-AZ) put aside a longstanding grudge over Rove's famously bold tactics in securing George Bush the 2000 GOP nomination, and said that Rove’s advice would be welcome in his campaign.
"Nobody denies he's one of the smartest political minds in America," McCain said. "I'd be glad to get his advice. I get advice from a lot of people. I'd be happy to have his advice."
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/McCain_says_hed_be_glad_to_0211.html
"It's not so much whether I approve of his tactics or not. It's that he has a very good, great political mind."
Translation..."I hope he uses some of his dirty tricks FOR me this time".
By the way, I love the photo of Uncle Fester Rove that accompanies the story. Classic. "M.C. Rove" is BACK.
I thought he was America's Maverick!
My past experience generally shows an inverse correlation between how truthful a person is, and how enthusiastically and vehemently they proclaim their truthfulness.
If you're honest, people will notice and treat you as such. If you claim to be honest, you're most likely hiding something.
Pretty much the same for piety. The most pious people in the world don't run around proclaiming their piety.
Also Trademarked by McCain, inc:
"My Friends"
"I was tied up at the time"
"Footsoldier in the Reagan Revolution" (inspired to be so while a POW, during Reagan's second term as Governor of California, which makes ZERO SENSE)
"Make the Bush tax cuts (which I voted against) permanent"
I'm all in favor of a "straight talk" patent. It would bankrupt the media instantly.
The difference, cope, is that Obama actually gives people hope. McCain most decidedly does not give people straight talk. That is what's known as a "media narrative".
They are acting as unpaid propogandists for the McCain campaign by pushing this favorable spin about him that is easily proven to be completely false. If it were true, and he did give us straight talk, the label would be warrented. It would also be a legitimate news event to cover, since most politicians do not give us straight talk. Since he doesn't, the question becomes, why is the media so insistant on pushing this favorable label on a candidate when it is completely unwarrented? Clearly they are in love with him and refuse to cover him in a realistic light and investigate his record. In other words, they are not interested in doing their job.
Straight Talk: McLame will tell everyone how FUBAR the country is, and then tell them that it can only be fixed through "free market solutions and personal responsibility".
And that's how the Rs keep on doing it time and again: they screw up the country, and then tell us via a propagandist media that we are responsible for picking up the pieces. And many of us believe it, enough to make it impossible to do anything about! As evidence I submit to you as a mere sampling the S&L Scandal, Enron, and Katrina. And that's without mentioning military action.
And then the Ds come rolling back in, throw a little bit of largesse around, throw the people some bones, BUT NOTHING REALLY CHANGES!!!
Rs and Ds have us all under their hypnotic spell. Back-and-forth, back-and forth...
If we never voted for another republican again, things would change.
The back-and-forth happens because the party of change has to keep sweeping up the manure.