IBD editorial falsely claimed Obama "permitted" Cuban flag in volunteer office, called Senate colleagues "hypocrites"
SUMMARY: Investor's Business Daily asserted in an editorial that Barack Obama "permit[ed] the display of a huge Cuban flag at one of his offices, emblazoned with a mass murderer's mug" -- a reference to Che Guevara. In fact, the office in question is run and funded by Obama volunteers and is not sanctioned by the official Obama campaign. The editorial further claimed that Obama "dismiss[ed] ... his Senate colleagues who wear lapel flags as 'hypocrites.' " But a review of the Nexis database found no evidence that Obama has ever described any of his fellow members of Congress as "hypocrites" for wearing U.S. flag lapel pins.
Investor's Business Daily asserted in a February 12 editorial, headlined "Barack Guevara," that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama "permit[ed] the display of a huge Cuban flag at one of his offices, emblazoned with a mass murderer's mug" -- a reference to Argentinean Marxist revolutionary Che Guevara. In fact, the office in question -- featured in a February 6 news report by a Fox affiliate in Houston -- is run and funded by Obama volunteers and is not sanctioned by the official Obama campaign. The editorial further claimed that Obama "dismiss[ed] ... his Senate colleagues who wear lapel flags as 'hypocrites.' " But a Media Matters for America review of the Nexis database found no evidence that Obama has ever described any of his fellow members of Congress as "hypocrites" for wearing U.S. flag lapel pins. The editorial went on to assert that the display of the flag in the volunteer office "signals that a U.S. commander in chief tolerates supporters with loyalties to nations other than the U.S., including those loyal to enemy states that spy on and seek to harm the U.S."
A February 6 report on KRIV Fox 26 included footage of Obama volunteers opening a new office in Houston. At one point in the report, the Cuban flag with the image of Guevara is visible on an office wall. On the KRIV Fox 26 website, the following caption appears below the report: "The office featured in this video is funded by volunteers of the Barack Obama Campaign and is not an official headquarters for his campaign."
A February 12 report on the controversy over the flag by KRIV Fox 26's Sally McDonald featured Obama campaign spokesman Josh Earnest saying, "It's important for your viewers to understand that the office that was featured in the previous story was opened independently and separate from our official campaign."
Nonetheless, the Investor's Business Daily editorial described the flag as having appeared in "one of his [Obama's] offices."
Referring to a post on the Obama campaign website -- titled "On Reports of an Inappropriate Flag in a Texas Obama Office" -- the editorial went on to assert:
Obama would only call it "inappropriate," apparently without insisting it be taken down. That contrasts with his dismissal of his Senate colleagues who wear lapel flags [pins] as "hypocrites." Some hypocrites.
The editorial offered no evidence in support of the claim that Obama labeled his Senate colleagues who wear lapel flags "hypocrites," and a Media Matters review* of the Nexis database found no evidence that Obama had used the term at all to describe people who wear flag pins, much less his Senate colleagues. When asked during an October 3, 2007, interview why he was not wearing an American flag pin on his lapel, Obama said, "Shortly after 9-11, particularly because as we're talking about the Iraq war, that became a substitute for, I think, true patriotism, which is speaking out on issues that are of importance to our national security." He added: "I decided I won't wear that pin on my chest. Instead, I'm going to try to tell the American people what I believe will make this country great and, hopefully, that will be a testimony to my patriotism."
From the February 12 Investor's Business Daily editorial:
Election 2008: How is it a front-runner for the highest office in the land can reject an American flag on his lapel but permit the display of a huge Cuban flag at one of his offices, emblazoned with a mass murderer's mug?
Improbable as it sounds, it's true. Barack Obama, displaying the same "anything goes" standard of patriotism he showed when he ostentatiously refused to wear a U.S. flag in his lapel, now shows he's got a whole different idea about patriotism.
One of Obama's volunteer offices in Houston was caught operating under a huge flag of communist Cuba with Che Guevara's face printed on it, according to images shown on Fox News. Flak from bloggers ensued -- followed, of course, by spin control.
But rather than repudiate the image, Obama would only call it "inappropriate," apparently without insisting it be taken down. That contrasts with his dismissal of his Senate colleagues who wear lapel flags as "hypocrites." Some hypocrites.
The display of the Castroite flag with Che's picture on it sends a particularly disturbing message about his campaign. Apparently, Obama tends to attract the kind of people who think of mass murderers like Che and Fidel as romantic revolutionaries. Those same people see Obama as a man with a messianic message. These are the voters he'll be indebted to should he win higher office.
Worse yet, it signals that a U.S. commander in chief tolerates supporters with loyalties to nations other than the U.S., including those loyal to enemy states that spy on and seek to harm the U.S.
It coincides uncomfortably with Obama's call for no-strings-attached diplomatic relations with communist Cuba. He's even offered to meet with the dictators of Cuba, sanctimoniously implying that other administrations had no good reason for not doing so.
* A Nexis search of "All News" for the terms "Obama and lapel and pin and hypocrit!" yielded these results.















Wow. Lies from a wingnut rag.
This is me...unsurprised.
Yeah, and it's just a start.
Obama supporters are incredibly naive to think that this kind of thing won't turn into an epidemic if he is nominated. It's going to be a debacle for the Dems. Just wait and see... rust never sleeps.
Also:
Worse yet, it signals that a U.S. commander in chief tolerates supporters with loyalties to nations other than the U.S.
There it is again! What is this wingnut obsession (and gross misapplication) of the phrase "commander in chief"?
To paraphrase Inigo Montoya: they keep using that word...I do not think it means what they think it means.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqOHquOkpaU&feature=related
Absolutely hilarious video of an Obama supporter and a Hillary supporter hashing it out. Staged, of course, but funny!
"emblazoned with a mass murderer's mug" -- a reference to Che Guevara.
Oh please. Che Guevara is a mass murderer now?? I drove over the Canadian border into NY State in November, and I was for some reason suprised to see a picture of Dubya on the wall of the immigration room... If Che Guevara is a mass murderer, what does that make Dubya? And if a picture of Che on the wall is worthy of criticism, what does that say about the Immigration Office?
Obama tends to attract the kind of people who think of mass murderers like Che and Fidel as romantic revolutionaries.
Gee..ya think?
Oh please. Che Guevara is a mass murderer now??
No...he's not a mass muderer now. He's dead...by the hands of the Bolivian army with the assistance of Fidel Castro himself.
Yes..he was a mass murderer.
Here are some really groovy quotes from Obama's hero:
"I don't need proof to execute a man, I only need proof that it's necessary to execute him"
"We will march the path of victory even if it costs millions of victims. ... We must keep our hatred alive and fan it to paroxysm."
"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary...These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy of the The Wall! (El Paredón)"
A little context wouldnt hurt stranger. Its pretty easy to pluck quotes and make Guevara look like a cold blooded politician. But if you know anything of the context, there IS somethinge romantic about his passion and the things he achieved. However my point was more that the editorial is clearly being selective in its outrage - if we're going to say its NEGATIVE to recieve support from people inspired by Che Guevara, what word would we use to describe support from pro-war Republicans supporting illegal military escapades around the world?
and i think you mean "No...he's not a mass muderer now. He's dead...by the hands of the Bolivian army with the assistance of THE CIA."
Nope...while it is true that the CIA was there with the Bolivian army at the time, it was castro who gave him up by giving the location of his encampment.
Eyewitnesses report that the sadistic thug cried and whined and pleaded for his life...coward.
But if you know anything of the context, there IS somethinge romantic about his passion and the things he achieved
You are an absolute idiot.
I do know quite a bit about it. During my years of study about it, I had two classmates who had relatives killed by the Castro thugs...one actually at the hands of your much adored sadistic mass murdering thug hero, Che himself.
The Stranger, you have no evidence that someone told you that someone in his family died in the hands of Che. I strongly believe that you are lying about it. And if you are being truthful about it, I strongly believe that the lying Cuban wingnut that told you this story was lying
No cree Ud. simplemente porque no quiere creer. La prueba no es posible a menos que le doy a Ud. los nombres de mis amigos cubanos. Esa es algo que no quiero hacer por razones obvias. Tiene que confiar en esto.
Che Guevara is not the issue. The dishonesty of the editorial is the issue. Now, a false assertion on your part is part of the issue.
Here are some really groovy quotes from Obama's hero - The Strangeone
Can you provide us with anything from Obama expressing hero-worship of Guevara? Expressing words of admiration? Saying anything at all about Guevara?
If not, it would appear that you're as big a liar as the Investor's Business Daily. Not that that's news.
Obviously, the GOPS and neocons already believe Obama will defeat Hillary and run as the Dem candidate for president. At least some pundits (Juan Williams of Fox Noise Sunday) and even a few voters (a man on the street in So. Carolina) have pointed up the sad truth of an Obama run on the White House: the former, by saying the GOPS secretly want Obama to head the ticket; the latter, by suggesting that "America is still too prejudiced to elect an African-American."
McCain still has a chance with Obama in the saddle. The GOPS will play on his lack of experience and he will be swift boated as a leftie, unAmerican, &c. And the wonder of it is, Rove and Crew dirty tricked McCain when he ran against Arbusto in 2000. What a phony! But as for Investors Business Daily publishing such trash, hey, consider the source. Not only is IBD a WSJ wannabee, it panders to the same .01% of Americans who benefitted from the so-called "Bush tax cuts" (i.e. tax cuts for the super rich). That minority plus a few day traders.
I can't wait to see the reports from "sources" in Indonesia saying Barack was educated in a jihadist-Wahhabist madrassa in Jakarta and trained in terrorism, as well as the ones playing up his connections to Saul Alinsky, widely perceived by conservatives as a commie or worse. Then, there's the real estate deal he got into in Chicago (which Hillary wisely backed off of, perhaps because she, herself, got an insider trade on some option market dealings when Bill was in the Oval Office). Yep, Obama is the GOP choice all right. They'll use a combination of fear mongering and smear tactics and keep us in Bushism another four years.
1. The flag shown in the photo isn't "huge."
2. Where is the outcry about Southern Republicans waving the Confederate flag?
3. Based on a very limited understanding, doesn't Federal campaign law require candidates to not have contact with independent volunteer supporters?