About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

MSNBC, Fox News repeated false assertion that without congressional action, FISA will expire

February 14, 2008 6:33 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: Fox News host Martha MacCallum and MSNBC host Monica Novotny repeated the false assertion that if Congress does not reauthorize the Protect America Act (PAA), the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 would expire. In fact, what is set to expire are the PAA's revisions to FISA, which, among other things, expanded the government's authority to eavesdrop on Americans' domestic-to-foreign communications without a warrant.

8 Comments

Discussing President Bush's February 14 press conference urging Congress to reauthorize the Protect America Act (PAA), Fox News host Martha MacCallum and MSNBC host Monica Novotny repeated the false assertion that if Congress does not reauthorize the PAA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) would expire. In fact, what is set to expire are the PAA's revisions to FISA, which, among other things, expanded the government's authority to eavesdrop on Americans' domestic-to-foreign communications without a warrant.

After Bush's press conference, Novotny stated on MSNBC, "President Bush there pressing Congress to extend the FISA law. The president saying that U.S. intelligence gathering will be compromised if Congress fails to extend FISA by Saturday, which would allow it to expire if they don't extend it." On Fox News, MacCallum claimed, "President Bush has been very passionate about maintaining FISA, saying that it's a needed tool in the war on terror to protect our country." She went on to claim that "he's urging Congress to get together and find a way to continue that bill in order to keep the country safe."

In fact, as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) noted in a February 13 statement, "[T]he underlying Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which provides for the surveillance of terrorists and provides that in emergencies surveillance can begin without warrant, remains intact and available to our intelligence agencies." Further, a November 14 New York Times article reported:

The lapsing of the deadline would have little practical effect on intelligence gathering. Intelligence officials would be able to intercept communications from Qaeda members or other identified terrorist groups for a year after the initial eavesdropping authorization for that particular group.

If a new terrorist group is identified after Saturday, intelligence officials would not be able to use the broadened eavesdropping authority. They would be able to seek a warrant under the more restrictive standards in place for three decades through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Media Matters has documented numerous instances of media outlets falsely reporting that the government's ability to eavesdrop on the communications of suspected terrorists would expire if the PAA were not extended.

From the November 14 edition of Fox News' The Live Desk with Martha MacCallum:

MacCALLUM: First, let's go to the White House and take a look at the podium. President Bush is about to remark on the Protect America Act. There's an effort to extend what's known as the FISA Act, and President Bush will come out and talk about that in just a couple minutes. We'll take you back there as soon as that gets under way.

[...]

MacCALLUM: All right. President Bush has been very passionate about maintaining FISA, saying that it's a needed tool in the war on terror to protect our country. Today, he's urging Congress to get together and find a way to continue that bill in order to keep the country safe.

From the 1 p.m. ET hour of the November 14 edition of MSNBC Live:

NOVOTNY: President Bush there pressing Congress to extend the FISA law. The president saying that U.S. intelligence gathering will be compromised if Congress fails to extend FISA by Saturday, which would allow it to expire if they don't extend it. This is, of course, the wiretapping law that allows the government to eavesdrop on phone calls and emails in the United States, in cases where they suspect terrorist activity. The president even said -- the president is scheduled to embark on this trip to Africa, but the president even said if he needs to stay here to press Congress on this, he will stay here and delay that Africa trip. So, we're going to continue to follow that, of course, and bring you more details.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by eweston8542983 (February 14, 2008 7:19 pm ET)
         
      Tell your house rep how you feel about this!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by HotWings (February 14, 2008 11:58 pm ET)
         
      Why do you liberals always insist on making things easier for the terrorists?  What is it going to take to wake you people up?  Another 9/11?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by randall (February 15, 2008 1:42 am ET)
           
        Why do you conservatives hate the Constitution? What will it take to wake you up?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (February 15, 2008 8:36 am ET)
           

        Why do you liberals always insist on making things easier for the terrorists?

        How will it "mak[e] things easier for the terrorists?"

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jawill11 (February 15, 2008 9:18 am ET)
           
        Since the first 9/11 didn't make me quiveringly throw all of my Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms at the first father-figure who promised to make me safe, I don't think another one would.  It would just be a terrible tragedy that your heroes would exploit for their own gain while keeping you under your bed by shouting BOO repeatedly. 
        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (February 17, 2008 3:50 am ET)
           
        Why do you conservatives insist on taking away our rights? Is it stupidity or just your fascist tendencies? IF they are only wiretapping terrorist phoning Americans then there would be no problem getting a warrant. I am all for the wiretapping, just get a darn warrant.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by hstybuf6553 (February 15, 2008 12:26 pm ET)
         
      frankly, i don't think we need fisa, or for that matter spies, at all.  if we are truly a free country and truly believe in our democracy, then we should abolish fisa, the cia, and remove the confidentiality stamp from all secret documents.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ShoRnkn1415 (February 15, 2008 2:00 pm ET)
         
      Saw Republicans onCSPAN today ...Security professionals need warrantless wiretapping because there might be a backlog at FISA Court. Well, insteading of demogoging the issue, why don't they just fix the backlog? Ben Franklin said it best: A country that trades Liberty for Security deserves neither Liberty nor Security.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Fox News Channel
    FOX News Channel
    1-888-369-4762
    1211 Avenue of the Americas
    New York, NY 10036
  • MSNBC
    Mr. Phil Griffin,
    Senior Vice President, News
    NBC Television Network
    30 Rockefeller Plz
    New York, NY 10112
    phil.griffin@nbc.com

    Steve Capus,
    President, NBC News
    steve.capus@nbc.com

    MSNBC
    letters@msnbc.com
    MSNBC/Microsoft-NBC
    30 Rockefeller Plz
    3rd Fl
    New York, NY 10112
    (212) 664-4444