About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Echoing Reed, Fox News' Gibson asked whether "President Barack will blame America first"

February 20, 2008 7:10 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: On Fox News' The Big Story with Gibson & Nauert, Republican strategist and former Christian Coalition director Ralph Reed said of the recent comments made by Michelle Obama, wife of Sen. Barack Obama: "[I]t plays into a stereotype about the left wing of the Democratic Party, that it blames America first, that they don't see the greatness of America." Echoing Reed, host John Gibson later asked, "Does that mean that President Barack will blame America first?"

52 Comments

On the February 19 edition of Fox News' The Big Story with Gibson & Nauert, during a discussion of comments made by Michelle Obama, wife of Sen. Barack Obama, Republican strategist and former Christian Coalition director Ralph Reed asserted, "[T]he reason why I think this isn't going to go away, unless she apologizes quickly, is because it plays into a stereotype about the left wing of the Democratic Party, that it blames America first, that they don't see the greatness of America, and it really makes me wonder as somebody who is roughly about Barack and Michelle's age, what country she grew up in." Co-host John Gibson later said to Fox News political analyst Kirsten Powers, "Kirsten, let's put it this way: Michelle Obama is finally proud of the U.S. Does that mean that President Barack will blame America first?" Powers replied, "Well, actually, listening to that little speech that Ralph just gave, I mean, why do people think that about liberals? It's because people do what Ralph just did."

During the segment, Fox News broadcast an on-air graphic that featured pictures of Sen. Obama and Michelle Obama and read: "MICHELLE OBAMA FINALLY PROUD OF U.S.A. Will Prez Barack Blame America First?"

Gibson characterized Michelle Obama's comments as "the patriotism flap." As Media Matters for America documented, during the February 19 edition of Fox News' America's Pulse, host E.D. Hill asked Fox News Washington managing editor Brit Hume about Michelle Obama's comments. Hume went on to assert, "[T]here is this feeling, and it has affected Democratic politicians for a long time, that they are kind of embarrassed by patriotism."

From the February 19 edition of Fox News' The Big Story with Gibson & Nauert:

GIBSON: Meanwhile, the candidates' wives are battling it out on the campaign trail. Michelle Obama is now under fire for her controversial comments about being proud of her country.

MICHELLE OBAMA [video clip]: And let me tell you something. For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country, because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.

GIBSON: And today, Cindy McCain came right back at her over the patriotism flap.

CINDY McCAIN [video clip]: I'm proud of my country. I don't know about you if you heard those words earlier. I'm very proud of my country, and I'm proud to be a person that has voted in elections and I hope that all of you will do so today.

GIBSON: With us now, Fox News political analyst Kirsten Powers, a Democrat, and GOP strategist Ralph Reed. Ralph, if I can go to you first. Michelle Obama apparently slipped up. Now she did it twice. What do you think the importance of what she said is -- a lot or a little?

REED: Well, I think, you know, look, they're under the glare of the spotlight now, John. And this is what it's like to be the front-runner. And it can be revealing and sometimes unintentionally so. And this is not what the Obama campaign or the candidate wanted after spending really the last two days fighting over whether or not he was cribbing or plagiarizing lines from Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick's [D] speech.

Now you get this, and the problem is, the reason why I think this isn't going to go away, unless she apologizes quickly, is because it plays into a stereotype about the left wing of the Democratic Party, that it blames America first, that they don't see the greatness of America, and it really makes me wonder as somebody who is roughly about Barack and Michelle's age, what country she grew up in. I mean, I was proud of America when we won the Cold War, and the Berlin Wall fell and the Soviet Union disintegrated. I was proud when we expelled Saddam Hussein from Kuwait. I was proud when we liberated 50 million people from the Taliban and Saddam Hussein. I was proud when we provided humanitarian aid to the victims of an earthquake in Iran and to a tsunami in Asia.

You know, I think there's a lot to have been proud about, and I think the other thing it does is it plays into this weakness that's developing that the Obama candidacy is sort of a modern political equivalent of Beatlemania rather than a legitimate aspiration to be commander-in-chief.

GIBSON: Kirsten, let's put it this way: Michelle Obama is finally proud of the U.S. Does that mean that President Barack will blame America first?

POWERS: Well, actually, listening to that little speech that Ralph just gave, I mean, why do people think that about liberals? It's because people do what Ralph just did.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dazedandconfused26 (February 20, 2008 7:12 pm ET)
         

      "Fair and Balanced"

      Whatever, Ralph Reed is luny toons anyways.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (February 21, 2008 6:44 am ET)
           

        One needs to realize that the sneered "blame America first" meme thrown as a cutting insult at "leftists" is a natural one for the Rightwing ...

        BECAUSE ... the Rightwing is all about "blaming ANYBODY ELSE first". Blame the poor, blame the victims of natural disaster, blame the ragheads, blame anybody or everybody before ever taking personal responsibility. And if all else fails, NEVER take personal responsibility.

        Case in point: Asked about a failing economy for most Americans, Bush KNOWS that the economy is just fine for his pals at Haliburton and Exxon, so what can he do? He blames construction workers for "building too many houses." His economic policies cannot be to blame, his embracing of international markets which benefit only the biggest corporations cannot be a factor, it's all about building HOMES.

        Rightwingers, the "BLAME ANYONE AND EVERYONE ELSE FIRST" folks. They think it's "patriotism" ... because they have no concept of what patriotism really MEANS.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (February 21, 2008 11:58 am ET)
             

          Or, on Fox business shows, they blame the housing crisis on uninformed homeowners, who are too stupid to realize they took out an adjustable rate mortgage.

          But the best was when they blame Clinton for not getting Bin Laden.  That one's priceless and projection at its best.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by edenscape246494 (February 20, 2008 7:12 pm ET)
         
      More poo poo from Faux Noise championing the classless retort from Senator McCain's SECOND wife
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 20, 2008 7:25 pm ET)
           
        Actually, until this came up I didn't even know Cindy McCain could speak...unless her husband pressed a button. This woman looks like she was sent by Central Casting to audition for a major role in The Stepford Wives. Seriously...she creaps me out.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Clevenative (February 20, 2008 7:32 pm ET)
             

          Seriously...she creeps me out.

          Wow, I thought it was just me. Well, at least you could tell by her non-comment in today's follow-up that she "knows her place".

          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (February 20, 2008 10:06 pm ET)
               
            Considering tonight's New York Times story about John McCain's alleged involvement with lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, during his 2000 Presidential campaign might explain why McCain's Stepford Wife, Cindy, is constantly at his side playing the part of the dutiful spouse during the 2008 run.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by lostlogic (February 21, 2008 11:24 am ET)
                 
              I'm guessing you know very little about Cindy McCain and simply use this same insult for any wife of a republican.  Perhaps you should learn a little more about the woman before you go making stupid sexist comments like you are doing.  Additionally, you must subscribe to the same school of thought as David Schuster if you think it is remarkable that a candidates spouse is campaigning for them.  Yeah it is really comment worthy that the woman is supporting her husband in his run for President...what is she thinking...you don't see other spouses doing that...sheesh get a grip.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (February 21, 2008 12:07 pm ET)
                   

                No, LostSoul, actually I do know a little about Cindy McCain. She's a Budweiser beer heiress from Arizona. John McCain is about 18 years older than she is. I think she was 25 and McCain was 43 when they hooked up. McCain was still married to his first wife when they met.

                In the early nineties Cindy developed an addiction to Percocet and Vicodin. She was actually stealing drugs from a medical relief agency she had founded. She was busted by the DEA around, oh, 1996 maybe. She was able to stay out of jail by going into rehab, Betty Ford, I believe, through a diversionary program.

                Cindy said that both of her parents could tell she was a drug addict and needed help. Oddly, though, John McCain said he was "shocked" to learn that Cindy was addicted to Vicodin and Percocet. He had no idea. That's always made me wonder how close he really was to his wife. I mean, how can a wife be addicted to Percocet and Vicodin for three years or more and her husband have no idea. John found out about Cindy's addiction through her lawyer, BTW. Then for political damage control they called in three reporters, print, television and radio to give them friendly exclusives to break the story sympathetically.

                I like women but Cindy McCain creaps me out. With her perfectly coifed hair and tailored outfits and that smile frozen on her face she looks like a Stepford Wife. Weird eyes, too. My wife finds her creapy, too, so it's not just me.

                Well, look, I'd like to tell you more but I've gotta run and my fingers are cramping. But let me know if you want to know more about Cindy, okay?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (February 21, 2008 12:30 pm ET)
                     

                  I am certainly glad the left has no intention of sinking to cheap diversionary tactics when it comes to this election, they would never stoop to sliming candidate's wives by dredging up their past, or focusing on such ridiculous irrelevancies like their dress, their hair, or their eyes, or their "creepiness".

                  Nope, it's all substance and issues, whew....... 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by lostlogic (February 21, 2008 12:46 pm ET)
                       
                    Hey could you clarify that statement...I am on the left and I think this type of smearing is disgusting and indefensible and says more about those that engage in it then it does about those they are smearing. 
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (February 21, 2008 12:55 pm ET)
                         
                      Lost, Forgive me if I was unclear, I was referring to "some" on the left, specifically addressing Irony's "characterization" of Mrs. McCain.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by lostlogic (February 21, 2008 1:03 pm ET)
                           
                        Thank you (-:  I guess I was a little jumpy on you but I am really sick that this is the way our political campaigns always go.  I am sick of it...if people want change then I say this is a great place to start.  Let's keep the arguments to policy and issues and stop the personal smears and gotchas.  We may not be able to unite on philosophical differences but we can cetainly unite on what we think is improtant to us in the national dialogue.  I don't care about the state of anyone's marriage, I don't care about how people look or sound, I don't care if they have family members who have their own personal issues.  I care about where they stand on foreign policy, I care about where they stand on domestic policy, I care about what issues are going to be given priority whe they are in office, I care about how they will get it done.  I don't think I am unique in these things and I was going to let Irony's personal digs at Cindy McCain go when I thought people would ignore his comments but since some felt the need to validate it I spoke up. 
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by tommy (February 21, 2008 1:26 pm ET)
                             
                          Very well said.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by mefirst (February 22, 2008 9:37 am ET)
                             
                          lost, i have to agree on the contention that the personal stuff should not be the focus.  if we can criticize cindy mccain for standing by her husband in this campaign, then how do we not say the same thing about hillary.  it's fine to question whether mccain did anything for this woman that was out of line.  but if mccain messed around, then, like the clintons, that is for them to work out.
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 9:49 am ET)
                             
                          Cindy and John McCain both contributed to the piling on of Michelle Obama. John McCain is a fraud IMO. And Cindy McCain  was just a piece of young, blonde eye candy for whom McCain dumped his dumpy first wife When you examine the particulars of the McCains and their marriage the way McCain parades his trophy wife around seems IMO entirely stage crafted. And if you haven't noticed that Cindy McCain has the robotic, glazed over, but perfectly groomed, demeanor of a Stepford Wife then you need eye glasses. But, hey, she's proud of her country...I'm getting all gooey. Frauds...both Mr. and Mrs. McCain IMO.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by mefirst (February 22, 2008 11:33 am ET)
                               
                            could you point out any candidate who does not parade his wife around?  i agree that you can criticize on the issues and even such things as her use of painkillers, but i don't see how having your spouse along is anything unusual. 
                            Report Abuse
                • Author by lostlogic (February 21, 2008 12:42 pm ET)
                     
                  Gee...you sure showed me so you think the crippling addiction this woman had is the beginning, middle , and end of the information about her.  You also apparently think you are some kind of expert into their personal relationship.  So I guess the only thing of relevance to discuss about Obama is his confession of abusing illegal drugs...oh and I guess we could discuss the state of their marriage and extrapolate from some of Michelle's Obama's comments that there marriage ani't so solid since apparently if we want to we can take her comment that he isn't always in "her" bed in the morning as an indication of the solidness of that union. (BTW let me be clear I do not subscribe to these views I am using them to point out the hypocrisy of your statements)  See how this works...I am so tired of the hypocrisy of some here that they can see the problem when it is happening to someone they support but freely enagge in it to those they don't. Cindy McCain has done an amazing amount of work for children and health issues regarding children and you and your wife's ridiculous comments on the woman's physical apperance says alot more about you then it does about her.  Maybe her stiff apperannce you find so "creepy" lends more to her medical issues then the "creepyness" you discribe...I would like to see how you recover from a dibilitating medical incident and regain your mobility so as not to "creep" people out with your disability.  As far as someone missing a soul...I would look in the mirror if I was you and see where this animosity to a woman you obviously know very little about is coming from...how did her personal addiction affect you personally, how does her relationship with her husband affect you personally, how does her financial situation affect you personally. How does the age difference between her and her husband affect you personally, how does her physical apperance affect you personaly.  You are no better then those on rightwingers who try to judge the personal lives and decisions of other people for no other reason then to be sactimonious and judgemental about issues that habve no affect on them persoanly.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by IRONY 101 (February 21, 2008 1:49 pm ET)
                       

                    Jeez, what is your problem...?

                    (BTW, Cindy McCain is creepy looking. But she is prouder to be an American than Michelle Obama is. In fact, she's always been proud to be an American. Yep, she comes from a proud family. Rich, proud American family.)   ;>)

                     

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by lostlogic (February 21, 2008 1:57 pm ET)
                         
                      I thought I was pretty clear on what my problem is...people who enage in unwarranted personal smears and attacks simply because they don't agree politically with a person or their spouses political positions.  I personaly don't have a problem with Cindy McCain being proud of her country or Michelle Obama for the first time being really proud.  I do think it was a gaff on Obama's part because it can be exploited by people like you on the other side who aren't interested in discussing issues and policy but would prefer to enage in personal attacks and smears of their opponent.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 21, 2008 2:01 pm ET)
                           
                        I DON'T LIKE CINDY McCAIN! Got it? Clear enough for you?
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by lostlogic (February 21, 2008 2:14 pm ET)
                             
                          Oh I didn't express any confusion with the clarity of your position.  It is clear you don't like her...I even recall your reasons: because you don't like how she looks, because you don't think she has a good marriage, because she is younger then her husband, because she had a drug problem, because she campaigns for her spouse...yeah you were real clear about why you dislike this woman you don't even know.  I will leave you to your petty reasons...obviously having them pointed out to you makes you a wee bit testy. 
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by atheist (February 21, 2008 6:24 pm ET)
                               
                            How hard is it for a rich and privileged white women whose ONLY problems were of her own making to be proud of her country ?  Take a look at her wikipedia bio, it's got so much sap in it we could do a pancake breakfast for 500.
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 9:57 am ET)
                           

                        Cindy McCain was just a piece of young, blonde arm candy for whom John McCain dumped his not as unattractive, older first wife. IMO Cindy McCain looks like a glazed over Stepford Wife and her public appearances with her husband look stage crafted. Cindy McCain is still John McCain's arm candy...she's just not young any more.

                        And, BTW, Cindy McCain's drug addiction and her systematic theft of drugs, in addition to how she avoided prosecution are all well documented. Congrats to Cindy if she's no longer a thieving drug addict. But it's still part of who she is.

                        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 20, 2008 7:19 pm ET)
         
      I have read and listened to Michelle Obama remarks...but did I miss something? Did Michelle Obama say anything derogatory about America? Did Michelle Obama blame America for anything? I thought Michelle Obama's comments were, well...inspiring. But that's just the liberal in me talking, I guess.  ;>)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (February 20, 2008 7:23 pm ET)
           
        No, she never said anything derogatory about america. Fox news just twisted the facts so they could call her a t-i-double guh-er without really calling her a t-i-double guh-er. And the right wing base is eating it up like chocolate bon bons.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 20, 2008 11:42 pm ET)
           

        I don't think you missed anything, Irony. MO didn't say anything derogatory, and hardly anybody's falling for this one, even the bottom of the barrel dittoheads. The only people I've heard really trying to spiin this are those who get their paycheck for going on tv and radio to promote the GOP.

        The sloppy editing of the word "really" from the quote is pretty much a confession that their hallucinating.

        Also, notice the absence of righty trolls posting here who are on board with it (and there have been some stoopid ones around recently). I've been wrong about it before, but the GOP media may have finally found that point where they were able to underestimate their target audience.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Clevenative (February 20, 2008 7:38 pm ET)
         
      This poor woman. No matter what she says or does, from this day forward this will be with her -and on the tip of the tongue of every wingnut - for the rest of her life.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (February 20, 2008 10:17 pm ET)
           

        This poor woman. No matter what she says or does, from this day forward this will be with her -and on the tip of the tongue of every wingnut - for the rest of her life.

        Cleve, don't feel sorry for Michelle, feel sorry for Republican/conservative blowhards who will find they have met their match in Michelle. She did not get to where she is in life nor overcome all that life has thrown her by being afraid of these poor excuses for men. They will find themselves cowering from her cause this "sister" appears not to put up with a lot of bull sh*t.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (February 20, 2008 7:41 pm ET)
         

      Something very screwy is going on around here. 

      Michelle Obama made the same speech twice, apparently.

      Gibson's clip is from different time and place than the Breitbart clip linked by MMFA.

      The caption and headline of the Breibart clip quote her as saying "I am really proud of my country," yet the clip appears to have the word "really" edited out of the audio, just like the clip I saw on YouTube.

      Gibson's clip simply shows her saying "I am proud of my country" and does not look edited. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 20, 2008 7:49 pm ET)
           
        Wow...! They edited out the word "really" from her speech. Amazing how low these people will go. Any network that airs that edited clip should have to pay... Absolutely amazing...and slimey!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MoonbatYouBet (February 20, 2008 7:47 pm ET)
         

      How nice that a political hack who took dirty money from Jack A.  (the profanity filter hates his last name) can get some sort of credibility as a political strategist.

      Yep, the flow of A bram off money was too complicated and dry of a story for media coverage but they have plenty of time to dissect the speech of someone who isn't running for office at all.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (February 20, 2008 7:57 pm ET)
         
      unfortunately, when you hand the other side a club, they will hit you over the head with it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (February 20, 2008 8:04 pm ET)
           
        These days, if you don't hand them one, they'll go out and spend the money to make one.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (February 20, 2008 8:38 pm ET)
         
      If'n you want to know why the republicans will never ever let just anyone into a rally at bob jones university, this is why. They'd be dead uttering their racist comments to their base. At least democrats have the balls to let everyone hear them...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (February 20, 2008 8:43 pm ET)
         

      Produced via a no bid contract. Independent audit of the product revealed upon examination all the stopping power of a wet sock.

      Profit motives found paper machai the ideal composite for the impliment. But the lead shot was replaced by small element packing foam. The epoxy suffered cost cutting (but not price cutting) to become traditional water and wheat flour. Easy on the flour. Which under careful anaylsis, a volunteer tasted it, was somehow found to be sand.

      A product much like our media. The crust may appear formidable and of a weighty in aspect. Examination reveals a foam filling and sand deposits wherever its been shaken about.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by TomJoad (February 20, 2008 8:53 pm ET)
         
      I would much rather President Obama seek to blame everyone else first. The reality is, a True American Patriot knows that the US cannot be wrong, and always has honorable intentions, regardless of the outcome. No American President can be seen to address the cause of some of the great foreign policy problems, lest such a review be perceived as acknolweding a 'mistake.' That way, President Obama can continue the great trend of simplistic righteousness, best demonstrated recently by GWB and his 'we seek to promote democracy in Latin America and that's why its good Castro is stepping down' speech, spoken with no sense of irony or shame. President Obama Must NotMeet With Our Enemies, and must exhonerate the US for her 'inefficiencies.' Mrs Obama should be ashamed for questioning the Great Truth of her Time.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (February 21, 2008 11:10 am ET)
           
        Yes, the United States of America is really a bad country. Despite "some" good intentions the reality is that we are nothing better than imperialist mass murderers.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by TomJoad (February 21, 2008 3:53 pm ET)
             
          I'm glad you see it my way /sarcasm/
          Report Abuse
          • Author by TomJoad (February 21, 2008 3:57 pm ET)
               

            Of course, the irony in your response Chris is that I'm mocking this patriotic fervor that attempts to strangle any valid criticism of the US (and believe me there is plenty). You swing around and try to blanket me with the charge that all US actions are bad.

            Both my sarcastic post, and your serious scolding response, are simplistic black and white attitudes. Which was my whole point. Get a clue.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by achrispage6992 (February 21, 2008 6:55 pm ET)
                 

              You really are funny....no really.

              BTW, your feelings about the United States are well known. From your inane assertions about the use of the atom bomb on Japan to your blind partisan understandings of our involvement in Vietnam. You just can't stand it when someone points out your sarcasm is as silly as the sarcasm in my post. Here is a clue....It was Col. Mustard with the candlestick in the study. God you "blame America first" crowd never cease to amaze me. You are thankful for nothing.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (February 20, 2008 8:58 pm ET)
         
      You forgot to turn the sarcasm off Tom. Trust me some can't tell. The same folks who believe irony is a dietary suppliment.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (February 21, 2008 12:19 am ET)
         
      Gibson is such a joke. Baseless assertions and worthless dengrations is all he has.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by public takeover (February 21, 2008 10:14 am ET)
         

      Blame Fox second.  They are blaming America first.

      America is too diverse a country--"from the mountains ... to the prairies ... to the oceans ..." to lump everybody into one mudpuddle along with Fox.

      If Fox has a problem with Michelle being proud of her country--REALLY proud--then they need to ask themselves whether they're serving the public interest.

       I would say, no, they're not.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (February 21, 2008 12:01 pm ET)
         
      The question remains - why is Ralph Reed allowed on tv?  Shouldn't he be prosecuted for bilking the Indian casinos with Abramoff?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (February 21, 2008 3:17 pm ET)
         

      I am certainly glad the left has no intention of sinking to cheap diversionary tactics .... Tommy

      =============================================

      Nice try, Tommy.... but if you were meaning to refer to "some" on the left, here's a hint for you: Include the word "some." That way, it won't appear that you are painting an entire side with the same broad brush.

      But as usual, you're doing your part to keep America's straw industry from falling into recession. :)

       Keep up the good work!!!

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.