About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CBS' Smith failed to challenge claim by McCain's campaign manager -- a former lobbyist -- that McCain "is probably most feared by every lobbyist"

February 21, 2008 9:09 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: While discussing a New York Times article about Sen. John McCain's relationship with a telecommunications lobbyist, CBS Early Show host Harry Smith did not challenge McCain campaign manager Rick Davis when Davis asserted that McCain "is probably most feared by every lobbyist in this town of Washington"; he did not note that Davis is a registered lobbyist who, the Times reported, "represented companies" before McCain's committee.

30 Comments

On the February 21 edition of CBS' The Early Show, Sen. John McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis, responded to a New York Times article -- headlined "For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk" -- by claiming that "ironically," the Times targeted "the man who is probably most feared by every lobbyist in this town of Washington." Host Harry Smith did not challenge Davis' assertion; he did not note that Davis himself is the founder of a D.C.-area lobbying firm, or that he is a federally registered lobbyist (inactive as of 2005) who, the Times reported in the same article, "represented companies before Mr. McCain's Senate [Commerce Committee] panel."

Smith introduced Davis at the start of the interview as "McCain's campaign manager" and during the segment, Davis was identified in on-screen text as "John McCain's Campaign Manager." At no point in the interview did Smith point out Davis' lobbying background.

From the February 21 New York Times article:

One of his [McCain's] efforts, though, seemed self-contradictory. In 2001, he helped found the nonprofit Reform Institute to promote his cause and, in the process, his career. It collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in unlimited donations from companies that lobbied the Senate commerce committee. Mr. McCain initially said he saw no problems with the financing, but he severed his ties to the institute in 2005, complaining of "bad publicity" after news reports of the arrangement.

Like other presidential candidates, he has relied on lobbyists to run his campaigns. Since a cash crunch last summer, several of them -- including his campaign manager, Rick Davis, who represented companies before Mr. McCain's Senate panel -- have been working without pay, a gift that could be worth tens of thousands of dollars.

A July 11, 2007, Politico article reported that Davis, who also served as McCain's campaign manager in 2000, "founded a lobbying firm -- Davis, Manafort Inc. -- which has made at least $2.8 million lobbying Congress since 1998." According to a disclosure report filed with the Senate, Davis registered to lobby the Senate from 1998 to 2005 for Davis Manafort. A March 2000 report by the Center for Public Integrity noted that Davis represented two telecommunication companies, COMSAT and SBC Communication, Inc., that "had major (and controversial) mergers pending before the Federal Communications Commission in 1999, and both mergers were approved (the Commerce Committee has legislative oversight authority, and therefore quite a bit of political influence, over the FCC)." A February 3, 2007, National Journal article (accessed via the Nexis database) reported that "Davis, a longtime lobbyist and financial consultant," is "on leave" from Davis Manafort to work for McCain's campaign.

Additionally, Davis served as the president of the Reform Institute, an institute that the Times wrote was founded by McCain "to promote his cause and, in the process, his career." A July 28, 2005, Roll Call article (accessed via Nexis) by staff writer Paul Kane reported that Davis, who had been earning "$110,000 a year," "dropped his title of Reform Institute president" in July 2005.

From the February 3, 2007, National Journal article:

Still, McCain has a strong squadron of K Street allies. "Given McCain's stance as a reformer with a clear record on a broad range of issues, he's attracted support from surprising quarters," said Loeffler Group lobbyist William Ball III, a former secretary of the Navy and trade association CEO, and an old friend of the senator's.

Indeed, notwithstanding McCain's record on pushing lobbying and campaign finance reforms -- such as his sponsorship of landmark 2002 legislation barring campaign contributions of soft money to party committees -- he has pulled in considerable K Street backing.

On December 12, Rick Davis, a longtime lobbyist and financial consultant who is on leave from consulting firm Davis Manafort to serve as the CEO of McCain's exploratory committee, pitched a few dozen influence merchants at a Capitol Hill hotel. The event included pep talks from two GOP Senate colleagues -- Trent Lott of Mississippi and Pat Roberts of Kansas - touting McCain's credentials.

McCain has also garnered early fundraising and political help from former Rep. Tom Loeffler, R-Texas, who runs the Loeffler Group. A big Bush fundraiser in 2000 and 2004, Loeffler helped to organize a Texas event for McCain's PAC last year and is expected to do more fundraising this year. His partner, Ball, has also done yeoman's work for McCain by recruiting political allies in his native South Carolina and in Georgia, where he went to college.

Recently, Ball and Loeffler have approached other big names -- notably Donald Evans, Bush's old friend and former Commerce secretary, who chaired the president's 2000 campaign. To date, Evans has not committed to any candidate.

From the July 28, 2005, Roll Call article:

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has taken a pair of recent steps that could help lay the groundwork for a White House bid in 2008, severing his official ties with a nonprofit reform group and restarting his political action committee.

While his Straight Talk America PAC gives him a renewed political platform, McCain also has formally stepped down from the board of the Reform Institute, a group he formed with his top strategists to push his signature issue of campaign ethics.

McCain said Wednesday that the "negative publicity" that came earlier this spring from his association with the institute and the fact that its fundraising was conducted by his long-time adviser, Rick Davis, prompted him to step down from the 501(c)3 group.

"I'm no longer associated with it. I'm no longer on the advisory board," he said.

This follows stories in March in The Associated Press and The New York Times that outlined how Davis served as the top staffer for the Reform Institute while also lobbying on behalf of clients who had interests before the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee when McCain chaired the panel. In one case, Davis solicited a pair of $100,000 donations for the Reform Institute from Cablevision one week after the company's chief executive testified before Commerce on a provision McCain was actively supporting.

By cutting his own ties from the institute -- which was formed in the wake of his 2000 campaign and his successful 2002 effort to overhaul federal campaign laws -- McCain wants to inoculate himself from questions about whether he has held himself to the same standard as others.

In addition, Davis said Wednesday he had dropped his title of Reform Institute president and now serves the group on a voluntary basis. He had been earning $110,000 a year.

The nexus of what can be called McCain Inc., is based on Union Street in Old Towne, inside the office building that is home to Davis Manafort, his adviser's lobbying firm.

While Davis' official role with the PAC is still unclear, McCain's leading fundraiser, Carla Eudy, is expected to continue in that role for Straight Talk. She is also the top money person for the Reform Institute.

From the February 21 edition of CBS' The Early Show:

SMITH: Joining us now is John McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis. Good morning, sir.

DAVIS: Good morning, Harry.

SMITH: This article seems to imply, but doesn't flat out say, that Senator McCain had an affair with Vicki Iseman. You want to respond to that?

DAVIS: Yeah, I mean, this is like the worst kind of tabloid journalism on the front page of The New York Times. And we deplored it last night. We're going to push back today. We think it's unfair, unjust, and inaccurate, and I think The New York Times has a lot to explain for.

You said it best, all these things are implications -- two unnamed sources and no facts in the article. If anything, they try and drudge [sic] up all the old Keating Five stuff, 20 years old, to try and legitimatize [sic] what's nothing more than a tabloid story.

SMITH: Let me ask you this, though. Because The Washington Post also reports in the paper this morning that Senator McCain's staffers tried at some point to deny Miss Iseman access to the senator's office or try to encourage the senator not to see her. Can you deny that?

DAVIS: You know, it's right out of the New York Times piece. And what they did in The New York Times is they claim unnamed people indicated that that was the case, but John McCain's own chief of staff, Mark Salter, said it never was the case. So, somebody who's quoted and willing to put themselves on the line says, "No way," but The New York Times, picked up by The Washington Post -- and by the way, many other newspapers across the country -- print basically the fabrication from the Times.

SMITH: All right. Maybe the most significant allegations in this, though, is that Miss Iseman is, in fact, a lobbyist. She's a partner in an important firm. McCain has flown on some of her clients' private jets. And the notion here is that because she had extraordinary access to him, that he, in fact, tried to influence legislation on her clients' behalf.

DAVIS: I agree, Harry, that that is the most outrageous thing because they show absolutely no evidence of anything that he ever did for this lobbyist. And ironically, they take the man who is probably most feared by every lobbyist in this town of Washington, the man who's never done a favor for a lobbyist or a special interest, a man who has authored the ethics legislation, gone after the Jack Abramoffs of the world, and really set the standard for ethical behavior in this town, and without one shred of evidence, after talking to dozens of his former staffers, all of whom said this was not the case, didn't name a single one of them or even reference their interviews.

SMITH: Did Senator McCain directly contact Bill Keller, the editor of The New York Times, to try to get him to not run this?

DAVIS: No, he never even tried to get him to not run it. He contacted Bill Keller because their journalists, the four mentioned earlier in your article, were running around town, spreading this gossip to try and see what they could dredge up, and it was inappropriate and unprofessional behavior by The New York Times. And what John McCain called, is that that was what he was calling about. He's never tried to influence an article, never tried to plant a question. I mean, John McCain has spent his entire career on the back of that bus having a dialogue with journalists. Everybody knows it. He's the most successful politician in America. And yet, you know, they try to run a story that basically is full of innuendo and implications.

SMITH: All right, we shall see. Rick Davis, thank you very much for your time this morning.

DAVIS: Thank you.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (February 21, 2008 9:34 pm ET)
         

      obviously, mccain is the republican candidate, and obama is the favorite now in the democratic primaries.  but i think the question is, are we buying krispy kreme at 80 dollars a share?  meaning....

      i like dunkin donuts, their coffee, donuts, and rolls.  several years ago a krispy kreme opened up about 10 miles away from me. and people lined up for hours before it opened.  and i had people tell me it was great, way better than dunkin'.  so i decided to just check it out and bought a half dozen different donuts and.....they were dry and tasteless for the most part.  then people said, you have to get them hot.  a couple weeks later, i'm passing by and i see the hot donut sign and.....they were way too sweet when hot.   that store is now closed, along with a lot of others around the country.

      i know it's not an exact analogy,  obama is a dynamic speaker, without a doubt, and has some very good proposals.   but i think there is a tendency up until now to ignore the things that the republicans are sure to bring up.  like the fact that he had all the other candidates removed from the ballot in his first state senate race by challenging their nominating petitions,  doesn't look too good when you're talking about how inclusive you are.  or the fact that obama said in 1996 that he would ban handguns, exactly the issue that got michael dukakis in trouble in the red states in 1988.  a race where he started out ahead of poppy bush.   so, i hope we consider the krispy kreme effect and talk all this out now, not later.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by copiousdissent.blogspot.com (February 21, 2008 9:57 pm ET)
         

      IT IS AN OBJECTIVE FACT THAT HE IS THE MOST FEARED BY THEM!!!

       

      IN HIS ENTIRE CARER HE DID NOT SPONSOR A SINGLE PORK-PROJECT!!!!

       

      MMFA IS NOTHING BUT A POLITICAL HACK ORGANIZATION. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (February 21, 2008 10:17 pm ET)
           

        copiousdissent.blogspot.com: The political hack with the loudest mouth can be found by looking in the mirror. Yelling won't help - they're still LIES.

        Read this  McCain's Double-Talk on Pork & Lobbyists then stop back when your done eating your shoe. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 22, 2008 12:58 am ET)
             

          Good thing MMFA doesn't let posters use any font size they want. I'd hate to see CompliantConsents comments around, oh, October or so, as he watches his little fantasy regime fade into the mists of history.

          "WHY IS THERE NO ARIAL BOLD 250???!!!!???"

          The staff at his nursing home is going to be on double-duty then, and his internet access probably very limited.Fortunately,he's only good for about 10 words a day.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by see it real (February 23, 2008 5:03 pm ET)
             

          copiousdissent.blogspot.com: The political hack with the loudest mouth can be found by looking in the mirror. Yelling won't help - they're still LIES.

          Read this  McCain's Double-Talk on Pork & Lobbyists then stop back when your done eating your shoe.

          You can also find MORE proof of McCain's TRIPLE-TALK lies as it pertains to his connections to lobbyists at Democracy Now http://www.democracynow.org and at International News Network http://www.inn.com

           

          Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 10:23 am ET)
           

        IT IS AN OBJECTIVE FACT THAT HE IS THE MOST FEARED BY THEM!!!

        Two words Cope: VICKI ISEMAN

        What was hot, young Lobbyist Vicki afraid of, Cope? That McCain would have a heart attack while he was banging her?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by lostlogic (February 22, 2008 12:29 pm ET)
             
          Yes because obviously if you are a good looking women you must be sleeping your way through your career.  Get a grip you sexist jerk.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 2:24 pm ET)
               
            Go eat some ice cream you naive child.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by lostlogic (February 22, 2008 2:35 pm ET)
                 
              Oh you are so right I am sooo naive to think a good looking woman doesn't have to sleep her way to the top.  Gosh what was I thinking...thanks for setting me straight with your manly knowledge.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 2:44 pm ET)
                   
                Of course, lobbyists epitomize goodness and virtue. They are not motivated by money. They only want to do good things for America. And a female lobbyist would NEVER sleep with a powerful Senator to gain favor. This is America and stuff likew that doesn't happen in America. That's why I've ALWAYS been proud of my country.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by lostlogic (February 22, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
                     
                  Geeze...get a grip.  Who said anything never happens.  My point is you can't just go around making these sexist claims just because a woman is goodlooking.  ANd there is no reason to talk about her in the degrading way you did. There is no evidence that this woman did anything like what you claim.  If proof comes to light that this is what she did then that is one thing but this trashing peoples reputation just because you don't like their politcs is in my opinion what really needs to change in politics these days.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 3:40 pm ET)
                       
                    I am disgusted with the idea of John McCain cavorting with a young attractive lobbyist to the point that his campaign staff had to run her off. I am disgusted with the idea that McCain did favors for the woman's clients. McCain's a scumbag and the woman is reportedly boastfully ambitious. You do the math... You apparently don't get out in the real world very often do you?
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by lostlogic (February 22, 2008 4:09 pm ET)
                         
                      No I guess I don't believe people have to prove there innocent but rather the accuser has to prove their guilt.  I don't think there is any evidence to support these accusations.  Obviously ytou have a lower threshold and think people are guilty first and somehow it is their responsibility to prove a negative.  BTW even if you want to believ anonymous sources even they aren't claiming anything was acutally going on just that they were suspicious and worried about apperances....hardly a strong case for an actual affair even if you wanted to put value in these anonymous sources.  I know I wouldn't want to be judged on that shaky evidence would you?
                      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (February 21, 2008 10:46 pm ET)
         
      Charles Keating would be surprised to hear that CD. Plus all those industrialists he met in Utah. Been giving nice one on ones with many money swollin captialists recently. Grover Nordquist's group hasn't released their money yet, Arlie Fliescher's got 1.5 million ready to roll. Niether is going to waste any of it on a democratic candidate. Just waiting till John makes a few simple promises and he'll be awash in money and he's going to make nasty with their lobbyist's? Yah just trust him, he'd be good to have a beer with and that's whats of primary importance.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (February 22, 2008 1:07 am ET)
           

        Hey, Eweston, have you checked out Coprophagousdescents blogspotinhispants lately? Check out this take on M. Obama's comment;

        "The Obama camp has tried to spin this as her perspective as a black woman. Bullshi*!! She has never been proud of Oprah? She has never been proud of Condi Rice? How about Halle Berry?"

        Whatta maroon! I think he's decided that a person's pride in their country should be connected directly to being proud of somebody who is the same race and sex as that person's.No wonder he doesn't put out more than one all caps sentence here.He must, deep down, know what an imbecile he is.

        BTW, Copious, keep them coming, you're better than anything on the Cartoon Network.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (February 22, 2008 10:23 am ET)
             

          The quote about Mrs. O not being proud of Oprah was written by one of CDs sycophants. A bedwetter named Red Wolverine. No doubt a "Red Dawn" fan. Which means he's as hard ass as any keyboardists surfing the tubes. I'd be willing to bet he's got a nice little surprise cooked up for any AlQaeda operatives that may show up in his little town.

          I'll think twice before crossing our friend CD and his pack of net thugs now that I know the kind of people he rolls with.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (February 22, 2008 9:31 am ET)
         

      Nah I've been cowardly there Col. I'll get my grit together a give a peek after work. I have a suspicion he may not be welcome on a Fed Gov computer.

      My best to your hateful horthie.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 10:12 am ET)
         
      The more I see of John McCain the more despicable he becomes in my eyes. A total fraud... McCain is so in bed with lobbyists, and apparently not just in a figurative sense, that his self-created reputation as a good government, anti-lobbyist type is as fraudulent as it comes. Yet McCain will continue to look into the cameras, with his arm candy Stepford Wife at his side staring lovingly at him, promoting himself as a champion of ethics and integrity. Lying comes very easily to John McCain and his entire campaign. IMO everything that is McCain is nothing but a stage managed fraud.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by lostlogic (February 22, 2008 12:29 pm ET)
           
        Someone better alert the media.  Breaking news a candidates wife is campaigning with him.  Oh and in Irony's world women apparently fall into 3 categories:  the dumpy ones that apperently get discarded because that is the only thing about them of note, the young hot ones who aren't successful in their own right but rather must be banging their way through their careers, and the eye candy wife who in his mind serve only one purpose.  I am sorry to those that find this post offensive but I have now read a series of posts by this poster where he has denigrated women based on their looks and apperently thinks that is all there is to women.  I am sick of supposed liberal/progressive people who think it is ok to turn into chauvinistic jerks if they are talking about a spouse of someone on the other side of the aisle.  We seem to be able to clearly recognize when people are being racists but it is still ok in some circles to be sexist.  Sorry to disappoint Irony but there is more to women then their looks and they can not be put in boxes you design that label them soley based on where you think they fall in the looks department. 
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (February 22, 2008 1:50 pm ET)
             

          McCain cheated on his wife, Carol, numerous times.  If you're so outraged by male chauvinists, surely John McCain is worthy of your scorn as well.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by lostlogic (February 22, 2008 2:14 pm ET)
               
            If you are asking me would I personally want a relationship with him...no I would not.  I think if you look to solve whatever problems you are having in your relationship by looking else where rather then resolve the problem you are not the kind of person that  I would want a relationship with.  But I can also recognize that coming back from what he came back with as many military families can attest to ...it changes a person and brings a lot of personal baggae.  If you are asking me if his relationship problems have any bearing on his job...not in my opinion...I also didn't think CLinton's had any bearing on his ability to do his job and I don't care who anyone else is having consensual sex with...unless it is my husband.  I don't see cheating as a chavinistic problem neccesarily either though...women cheat too.  I have no idea what was going on in their relationship when he returned from his ordeal...and frankly I don't care what does it have to do with me personally.  Personal relationships are complicated things and unless you are in the relationship I don't think anyone can say for sure what the situation is.  As I said in another thread there are things about MCCain that I admire and things about him I don't.  I would not vote for him because I don't agree with certain aspects of his politics that are important to me.  I can list all sorts of issues with MCain that I have aproblem with but gotta say his personal relationship and his marriage are not one of them...I could care less...I certainly wouldn't want to be judged on how people perceive my personal relationships from the outside.  I also don't see why people feel it is appropriate to make personal smears against how a candidates spouse looks or make judgements about women based on how they look...what exactly does that have to do with anything.  My point is someone who bases their opinions on how a women looks and doesn't go deeper then that says more about that person then it does about the person they are judging on such narrow paremeters. DO you not think these type of judgements are sexist?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 2:41 pm ET)
                 

              McCain is a fraud. His campaign is a fraud. His wife is a prop. McCain has long had a reputation as a player in Washington. Cindy McCain is the quintessential trophy wife. When Cindy McCain was busted by DEA for systematically stealing drugs John McCain learned of Cindy's addiction to Percocet and Vicodin from Cindy's lawyer. McCain said he was "shocked". He had no idea. McCain's wife was addicted to Percocet and Vicodin for over three years and McCain had no idea his wife was a drug addict? Eiither the McCains do not have a very close marriage or perhaps it was convenient for McCain to have his wife stay whacked out at home. Either way, it doesn't speak very highly of either Mr. or Mrs. McCain.

              You seem to have a thing for John McCain and his trophy wife. That speaks volumes about your standards. Doesn't say much about your intelligence either.

              BTW, in recent conversations with several women friends I've learned that I am far from the only person who finds Cindy McCain creepy and artificial. So, please, don't pull that misogyny crap on me. You need to head out of your anal cavity and examine the phoniness that is the McCain campaign.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by lostlogic (February 22, 2008 3:04 pm ET)
                   
                I don't care about MCains wife former addiction anymore then I care about Obama's admitting to illegal drug abuse in his past.  I see no evidence that Obama is continuing to use drugs so I accept that it was a mistake in his past that he has moved on from and learned from.  I assume Cindy MCain has done the same.  I don't know why Cindy MCain's former addiction should be relevant since she is not the candidate.  SInce you obviously are such a blind partisean that you see everything in black and white depending on which side of the aisle you favor you obviously can't grasp the fact that I don't support McCain for president so I do not need to reexamine his campaign.  I am supporting the democratic nominee.  But just because I support oneside over the other doesn't mean I have to leave my sense of fair play and right and wrong at the door like you seem to do.  I am sure if someone were to speak about Michelle Obama in the terms you use about Cindy McCain you would be able to see the problem...it says something that you can't when you are blinded by partiseanship. 
                Report Abuse
                • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 3:36 pm ET)
                     

                  First, Cindy's McCain's addiction to narcotics and her systematic theft of narcotics from a relief organization over several years is quite different from Barack Obama admitting that he tried cocaine. So, right off the bat, let's put those two things in their proper realms.

                  Secondly, Cindy McCain was a 25 year year old rich, blond hottie who became the girl friend of the middle-aged and married John McCain's and then his arm candy trophy wife. McCain dumped his frumpy first wife for her.

                  John McCain has long rumored to be a womanizer in Washington. Now there is evidence to suggest that one of playmates was an attractive young blond lobbyist during his prior Presidential campaign. Of, course, only in your world is it inconceivable that John McCain would do this.

                  Now, in this campaign Cindy McCain is constantly by her husband's side. Was she there as much in 2000 when McCain was "hanging out" with Vicki Iseman? Absolutely, candidates wives are often with them on the campaign trial. In McCain's case however, I get the impression that it is more for the purpose of dispelling notions about McCain being a womanizer. Cindy McCain is a prop. And to make matters worse, she looks like a prop. Sorry to inform you of this but Cindy McCain looks and dresses like a Stepford Wife and the glazed look in her eyes and frozen smile do not dispel the impression of her as a pampered, middle age, substance abusing, Republican woman of privilege.

                  Further, Cindy McCain should not act disapproving of Michelle Obama's recent remarks, as Mrs. McCain did. When you're born with a silver spoon and coddled in a rich Republican family I'm sure it's easy to find more time and reasons to be proud of the country in which your wealth became possible. But when Cindy McCain says she's always been proud of her country I wonder whether she was actually sufficiently lucid during her drug addiction to validly make that assessment.

                  I don't care for the woman...

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mefirst (February 22, 2008 3:54 pm ET)
                       
                    my problem with what you are saying is that you and another poster on this thread portrayed mccain as a womanizer.  you may have heard of this guy named bill clinton.  i was not happy with what he did, but again, that was between him and his wife.  and someone who i like, dennis kucinich, is on his third marriage to a woman thirty one years younger. 
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 22, 2008 4:07 pm ET)
                         

                      One of the many fraudulent aspects of political campaigns in general is when the wife of a womanizing candidate is employed as a prop on the campaign trail to bolster the candidate's image as a sold family guy. I have seen and read enough about John McCain to conclude that this is what is occurring here.

                      Cindy McCain's past is despicable and if her name had not been Mrs. John McCian she would have gone to jail. I am sure Cindy McCain must be proud to be an Americam, as she professed recently after mockingly referencing Michelle Obama. She avoided jail time for stealing copious amounts of narcotics because she's a rich Republican heiress who's married to a U.S. Senator. What a great country...! What phony people, Mr and Mrs. McCain...

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by mefirst (February 22, 2008 5:40 pm ET)
                           
                        let me clue you in.  it's all a dog and pony show.  the american people are too dumb to pick up on what's really important so everyone goes for all this symbolism.  politicians frequently cheat on their wives, just like a lot of americans.  if this was our worst problem, we would be in good shape.   
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by lostlogic (February 22, 2008 3:58 pm ET)
                       
                    First off you are mischaracterising Michelle Obama's pride in her country.  Michelle Obama has expressly said she is very proud of her country so I guess it isn't only rich white woman who can feel pride in their country.  WHat Michelle Obama was referring to with respect to her pride it was in the enagagement in the political process being exhibited in this election.  Obviously like many she was disappointed in people's lack of interest in her adult life in the political process and if you listent o her explain herslef that is clearly what she is saying it had nothing ot do with racial issues.  Secondly, Cindy McCain is not the one demensional person you are hating on.  She has done a lot of humanitarian work and her focus has been on children's causes...I think that work is something to be admired.  I think her addiction and subsequent actions were personal failings she has had to deal with and live with but I just can't get all sanctimonious about it...I don't know about you but I know a lot of good people who tackled addiciton and all its accompaning actions.  I think to dismiss someone because you resent their wealth is a little petty...you don't know what her life was like and you don't know what things she may have faced.  Money doen't buy happiness and does not protect you from all lifes hurdles.  I know some of her personal history and while it may not raise to the magnitude that other have suffered that doesn't make it any less impactful to the person who experienced it. As for the personal relationship stuff I just think that is so silly  it is there business.  It is very hard to judge someone elses personal relationship if you are not in it yourself.  I just don't understand why people feel the need to make personal attacks there is plenty of substance and policy positions you can go after these politicians on why go for the gutter stuff all the time.  I just wish everyone could take a deep breath and try to look at things from different perspectives even if they differ in political leanings.  I guess there is as much chance of that happening as there is my wish for world peace too /-:
                    Report Abuse
    • Author by dazedandconfused26 (February 22, 2008 1:30 pm ET)
         

      "is probably most feared by every lobbyist"

      yeah they are afraid he'll kick off before he can get them what they paid for.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by see it real (February 23, 2008 5:01 pm ET)
         
      Sounds like Harry Smith is a right wing conservative Republican himself, AND Smith is trying to help Liar McCain get elected.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.