About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Buchanan: Clinton's raised voice is one "every husband in America ... has heard at one time or another"

February 26, 2008 1:56 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On Morning Joe, Pat Buchanan said that when Sen. Hillary Clinton "raises her voice, and when a lot of women do ... it reaches a point ... where every husband in America ... has heard at one time or another." He later stated, "I know that's a sexist comment." Commentator Mike Barnicle previously compared Clinton to "everyone's first wife standing outside a probate court."

76 Comments

On the February 26 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, political analyst Pat Buchanan asserted that when Sen. Hillary Clinton "raises her voice, and when a lot of women do, you know, it's -- as I say -- it reaches a point ... where every husband in America ... has heard at one time or another." Co-host Mika Brzezinski replied: "Oh, Pat, you're lucky you're not in the studio, I'm telling you." Buchanan laughed and said: "I know that's a sexist comment ... but there's truth to it! ... There's truth to it." He continued: "It's very difficult for women to reach those kinds of levels effectively, as it is to make them sort of a rally speech. They're not good at that."

Brzezinski then said:

BRZEZINSKI: There is something so wrong with what you're saying, and what I fear is that the effect may be exactly what you're saying because of this double standard that people can't hear strength from a woman without using the B-word, and quite frankly, if that is what people are going to take away from this, it just seems to me as, well, everything that the Clinton campaign is arguing then.

Earlier in the segment, Buchanan had stated: "[I]t's very tough for a woman. You see two men going back and forth at each other, you say, 'Boy, they're really going at it.' ... And you see two women or something, and say, 'Boy, what a catfight this is.' "

On the January 23 edition of Morning Joe, while discussing the January 21 Democratic presidential debate with an all-male panel that included co-hosts Joe Scarborough, Willie Geist, and correspondent David Shuster, political and social commentator Mike Barnicle said of Clinton: "[W]hen she reacts the way she reacts to [Sen. Barack] Obama with just the look, the look toward him, looking like everyone's first wife standing outside a probate court, OK? Looking at him that way, all I could think of ... was this fall, if it's [Sen. John] McCain that she's facing, McCain is likable. She's not." All three MSNBC hosts laughed at Barnicle's comparison of Clinton to "everyone's first wife standing outside a probate court," with Scarborough interrupting Barnicle by laughing loudly before saying, "I'm sorry. Go ahead."

From the February 26 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:

BRZEZINSKI: This is on the front-page of these major newspapers. USA Today: "Obama now seen as more electable." And "Obama's support" -- on the front page of The New York Times -- "grows broader, new poll finds." So, this is something that Hillary Clinton has to take on. Her back's against the wall. Pat Buchanan, looking ahead to tonight -- you know, last week, you said she needs to do something, but now I'm not sure you agree with what she's doing.

BUCHANAN: Well, not necessarily. But I do think tonight's going to be the second Ali-Frazier fight, quite frankly.

GEIST: Yes, yes.

BRZEZINSKI: Yeah.

BUCHANAN: It'll really -- I'm really looking forward to it. This could be a very climactic event in the political career and certainly in the presidential campaign of Hillary Rodham Clinton. We're all going to look at whether she handles herself the way she did at the end of the Texas debate or whether she's gone back -- basically she's going back into battle. I think what she's got to do is very -- is very simple.

She has to separate herself from Obama, to raise real doubts in the public mind, because this is going to be a very large audience for this debate, about whether Barack Obama is really ready to handle the foreign policy of a nation at war in two countries and which could be at war in more. Raise questions about that without making herself look like a -- frankly, a strident political attack dog, if you will. So, it's a very, very tough thing. And as Mika -- as you've mentioned correctly, we've talked about it -- it's very tough for a woman. You see two men going back and forth at each other, you say, "Boy, they're really going at it."

BRZEZINSKI: Yeah.

BUCHANAN: And you see two women or something, and say, "Boy, what a catfight this is."

BRZEZINSKI: Well, and you know, and that's what's so unfair.

And Willie, I know you have a question about the polls; we'll get to that. But you know, you think about what she said over the weekend -- the sound bites that have been isolated -- and imagine those coming from the mouth of a male candidate, and he'd look strong and aggressive --

BUCHANAN: Sure.

BRZEZINSKI: -- like a fighter. And what's happening here with Hillary?

BUCHANAN: Well, it's the -- well, frankly, it's the voice, to be -- look, Barack Obama's got a very deep voice. He can go out, he can use mockery and ridicule, and it comes off very smooth and pleasant. But when she raises her voice, and when a lot of women do, you know, it's -- as I say -- it reaches a point --

BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, OK.

BUCHANAN: -- where every husband in America --

BRZEZINSKI: You know what?

BUCHANAN: -- has heard at one time or another.

BRZEZINSKI: Oh, Pat, you're lucky you're not here in the studio, I'm telling you.

BUCHANAN: [laughing] I know that's a sexist comment, but it is --

BRZEZINSKI: It totally is!

BUCHANAN: -- but there's truth to it!

BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, but --

BUCHANAN: There's truth to it. It's very difficult for women to reach those kinds of levels effectively, as it is to make them sort of a rally speech. They're not good at that.

BRZEZINSKI: OK.

BUCHANAN: She's very good at the debate --

BRZEZINSKI: Uh-huh.

BUCHANAN: -- the debate format.

BRZEZINSKI: There is something so wrong with what you're saying, and what I fear is that the effect may be exactly what you're saying because of this double standard that people can't hear strength from a woman without using the B-word, and quite frankly, if that is what people are going to take away from this, it just seems to me as, well, everything that the Clinton campaign is arguing then. So, I don't know. I mean, I'm --

GEIST: Mika, I don't argue with you.

BRZEZINSKI: I have to speak for women.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by werner (February 26, 2008 2:04 pm ET)
         
      I have to admit that headline about Hillary makes me laugh.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TopekaMan (February 26, 2008 2:05 pm ET)
         
      Unfortunately, what they're saying is true and it's Hillary's Achilles' Heel.  She can be likable at times, but when she's in her "shame on you, Barack Obama" mode she's extremely unlikable.  
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SFnomad (February 26, 2008 2:10 pm ET)
         

      Sexist pig ... no wonder the Repulsive Party is dying a (not so) slow death.

      Could you ever hear one of these male sexist talking gasbags say ... <<<But when he raises his voice, and when a lot of men do, you know, it's -- as I say -- it reaches a point -- where every battered wife in America -- has heard at one time or another.>>>

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (February 26, 2008 2:12 pm ET)
         

      BUCHANAN: Well, it's the -- well, frankly, it's the voice, to be -- look, Barack Obama's got a very deep voice. He can go out, he can use mockery and ridicule, and it comes off very smooth and pleasant. But when she raises her voice, and when a lot of women do, you know, it's -- as I say -- it reaches a point --

      BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, OK.

      BUCHANAN: -- where every husband in America --

      BRZEZINSKI: You know what?

      BUCHANAN: -- has heard at one time or another.

      BRZEZINSKI: Oh, Pat, you're lucky you're not here in the studio, I'm telling you.

      BUCHANAN: [laughing] I know that's a sexist comment, but it is --

      BRZEZINSKI: It totally is!

      BUCHANAN: -- but there's truth to it!

      =====

      Yeah? So? Pat's right, so there ya go..

      Considering the other stuff being said by the media about Hillary, this is tame. Even St. Keith has said a nasty stuff about Hillary. But of course we won't see that highlighted here ;-)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (February 26, 2008 2:18 pm ET)
           
        Exactly Jeter. Buchanan even admits it's sexist, and it is.  Are these political comment shows not supposed to even discuss topics like this?  Talk about thin-skinned silliness.  If Hillary becomes president, battling stupid little sexist comments like this will be the least of her worries, and she would probably be the first to say that.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (February 26, 2008 3:35 pm ET)
             

          Tommy -

          Your point is valid - this topic does make Hillary and liberals look pretty weak and thin-skinned.

          The worst part is that a topic like this is just an excuse for Hillary's poor performance.  Hillary and her apologists want to blame the media, but they should look at the candidate herself.  Democrats cannot wait to dump her for Obama.

          I am simply going to say the truth about Hillary - even if it gets an Obama supporter banned from MMFA:

          Remember the scene in the Wizard of Oz where Dorothy accidently splashes water on the wicked witch?  Dorothy and her friends were suprised when the witch's guards thanked them for killing the witch.

          Well, replace Dorothy with Obama and the wicked witch with Hillary.  The guards will be replaced by the "super delegates".    I think you get the point.

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (February 26, 2008 3:44 pm ET)
               

            PS - by the way, I was not trying to compare Hillary to a wicked witch.  I was merely relating the situation in the scene to what is happing with the superdelegates.

            So don't even go there...

            Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (February 27, 2008 12:14 pm ET)
               
            No this is not an EXCUSE for anything. This is exposure of Buchanon passing off sexist stupidity for punditry.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (February 27, 2008 1:42 pm ET)
                 

              Solon:

               No this is not an EXCUSE for anything.

              did you watch last night's debate?   Did you notice when Hillary whinned like a little baby about the media and she mentioned the Saturday Night Live sketch about how easy Obama was being treated by the media?

              YOU may not think that Hillary is not trying to come up with excuses, but SHE is trying to blame the media because she got her (oh so ample!) butt kicked by Obama.

              MMFA is a site that enables Hillary's fantasies about how all her problems can be blamed on Chris Matthews and MSNBC.

               

              She (and MMFA) need to grow up.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (February 27, 2008 2:05 pm ET)
                   
                I find plenty to criticise in Senator Clinton's voting record and positions, but plenty to criticise in the punditocracy that have a lock on our airwaves. They obsess over trivia and do not cover what is important. Their criticisms of Sen. Clinton are narrow and small minded.

                They should be called out for it and often.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (February 27, 2008 2:09 pm ET)
                   
                I dont care what Hillary did. I find it hard to believe she, at this point, could do anything that would lower my already low opinion of her.  THIS SITE DOES CONSERVATIVE MEDIA ANALYSIS NOT POLITICS. So WHATEVER Hillary did THIS is not making excuses its doing what they do YOU need to grow up.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (February 27, 2008 3:29 pm ET)
                     

                  Thanks for the best laugh of the day:

                   THIS SITE DOES CONSERVATIVE MEDIA ANALYSIS NOT POLITICS.

                   

                  You were joking, right?


                  Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (February 27, 2008 12:13 pm ET)
             
          Why is it so hard for you to understand this is not a site about the big picture politics. Its about the media and its performance. YES this was sexist, THAT is the point and it is exactly what MMFA is SUPPOSED to do. What Hillary can or will do if she ever becomes president are subjects for OTHER websites.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (February 27, 2008 1:22 pm ET)
               
            Well, feel free to concentrate on little silly irrelevencies such as this if it gives you some comfort, but you would do yourself a favor to focus on the big picture instead.  But then you couldn't nitpick your way through happily fighting little skirmishes such as this, otherwise you'd be forced to deal with reality, and apparently you'd rather not.  Whatever floats your boat.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (February 27, 2008 2:11 pm ET)
                 
              I come to THIS site to discuss what THIS site is for. If YOU think its trivial feel free to peruse the several million OTHER sites out there. Your constant whining that this site doesnt focus on what YOU think they should focus on is silly. ITS ABOUT THE MEDIA NOT THE POLITICS. What about this are you congenitally unable to understand? The big picture is someone ELSES JOB. Feel free to pick up the slack on your OWN website and I will feel free to drop by and tell YOU how to run it.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by tommy (February 27, 2008 2:21 pm ET)
                   
                Well, when and if Hillary becomes president, and she is embroiled in some national security crisis, and some radio talk show host blasts her for wearing a pant suit they don't like, then you can fight that little battle instead and haul out your usual list of expletives toward that rightwing blowhard talker.......because that is big stuff, Hillary is glad you have her back.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by solon (February 27, 2008 2:54 pm ET)
                     
                  Do you KNOW what I do when I am not posting here? You DONT? Imagine my suprise. Do you take your plumber to task for not fixing your electrical system? EVERYONE doesnt have to do EVERYTHING everywhere. THIS site is not about the political big picture. Just because THEY are not doing it doesnt mean it isnt being done. Are you really so dumb that you dont understand this? Your stupidity about me having Hillarys back is laughable. I have stated many times how little I like the woman. You KNOW this and just like to lie. IF you have a real Jones to talk about the big picture politics and what Hillary will or wont do, great, this just isnt the venue. Demanding that MMFA do what YOU think they ought to is dumb. Start your OWN website and do whatever you want with it. THIS ISNT YOUR CALL. It is perfectly legitimate for MMFA to specialize and call out neandrathals like Buchanon for being a sexist idiot instead of talking about the issues. In fact its kind of silly for you to be attacking MMFA for not doing what MMFA is attacking Buchannon for not doing when ITS HIS JOB NOT MMFA's. This is actually pretty simple. Most reasonably bright ten year olds could understand it.
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by Sueelldd (February 26, 2008 2:20 pm ET)
           
        Very true Jeter, Keith Olbermann can smear Hillary and his guests can use terms in the past like "lynch" but that is ok, becuase he spews the party.  Why does Keith Olbermann allow Pat Buchanan on his show if Buchanan is so horrible? Where is the outrage ?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (February 26, 2008 2:35 pm ET)
             

          Anybody who finds the outrage, please report to Sueld immediately. She's been looking for it for months now. She couldn't find it when she busted into Keith's crib. It's not at SanS Sannity's place. I say Jeter stole it and is just taunting Sueld without her knowledge.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by SFnomad (February 26, 2008 2:41 pm ET)
               
            The three of them are just having their typical little circle jerk.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by T-Hone (February 26, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
               
            Uh-oh, someone mentioned Olbermann, we know what that means!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (February 26, 2008 2:53 pm ET)
                 
              Uh huh, unless it's in a flattering light, it ain't allowed here!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by juliajayne (February 26, 2008 3:07 pm ET)
                   
                Yes, that's right. You guys are never allowed to bring up Keith. Except to derail a thread or 50. I feel for you Chaka Khan.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jeter2 (February 26, 2008 3:16 pm ET)
                     
                  Says Julia helping to detrail it ;-)
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne (February 26, 2008 3:22 pm ET)
                       
                    Hey, it's Chaka Khan's fault. And your fault. Take it like a man, Sir Jeter :-)
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by juliajayne (February 26, 2008 3:27 pm ET)
                         
                      Oh and give the outrage back to Sue so she'll stop chasing her tail looking for it.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Sueelldd (February 26, 2008 3:37 pm ET)
                           
                        I am that important that you talk about me ? Im honored Julia , but lets stay on topic. Stop derailing, I know its hard to be critical of Saint Keith but being critical of the ones we love helps us all grow.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by juliajayne (February 26, 2008 3:51 pm ET)
                             
                          Yes, by all means, let's stay on topic. Maybe you could "grow" to not mention your important love affair with KO every thread then.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Sueelldd (February 26, 2008 3:52 pm ET)
                               
                            Ok, so in the Cunningham thread I mentioned KO. If you could get your facts straight please. 
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by jeter2 (February 26, 2008 4:00 pm ET)
                                 

                              Mmmm cat fight?

                              Let's make it fun. Mud or jello?

                              I'll wait for Snoop to arrive & decide. He's got that "other voice" thing going ;-)

                               

                              Ok sorry Lady Julia, I'll behave :-/

                              Report Abuse
        • Author by JLyons (February 26, 2008 2:40 pm ET)
             
          Well Sueeld , becuase MSNBC is the network of double standard. We wont have outrage from them.  Im still waiting for an African American presence in the morning after the Imus racist remarks. Even Imus has 2 African Americans on his radio show now, but MSNBC? No that too tough for them.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Sueelldd (February 26, 2008 3:38 pm ET)
               
            I think hell will freeze over before AMNESSNBC puts an African American on the 6am timelot. or in primetime. Also why no females on AMESSNBC in primetime? We see sorry looking white men. Mathtews, Olby and Abrams. 
            Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (February 26, 2008 4:14 pm ET)
           

        What a load!  Granted, Obama is blessed with good pipes, and Hillary's voice is no better than Bill's.  But for a guy who screeches like Buchanan to criticize the sound of anyone else's voice is the height of glass-housedness. 

        Every time he, Terry Jeffreys and Chris Matthews are on the air together all the dogs in my neighborhood howl along.  And the canines' comments are far more cogent.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mr. l (February 26, 2008 2:34 pm ET)
         
      Is it me or is MSNBC tripping all over themselves and actually TRYING to outdo Fox as the worst *news* network?  It's as if somebody 'upstairs' just decreed 'Full Smear Ahead!" to all the station managers at that network.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by JLyons (February 26, 2008 2:34 pm ET)
         
      Well after the way she has treated Obama with her racism and division, what Buchanan said was mild about it. I can not stand Hillary anymore. She has really been a deplorable person in this campaign. But I guess its ok to try and bring down the "Black man" in the eyes of her and her vicious staff. 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by atheist (February 26, 2008 2:53 pm ET)
           
        Uh, can you please refresh my memory ?  Exactly what did Hillary Clinton say that was racist ?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by JLyons (February 26, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
             
          She has not said anything racist, her campaign however had had racial overtones. 
          Report Abuse
          • Author by atheist (February 26, 2008 2:57 pm ET)
               
            You're nuts !  "Racial overtones" ????  And there as been OUTRIGHT SEXISM against Clinton and yet you find her disgusting ?  
            Report Abuse
            • Author by JLyons (February 26, 2008 3:01 pm ET)
                 
              What is the sexism?   Has Obama been sexist toward Senator Clinton? Did Mrs Obama compare Senator Clinton in the same manner that Bill Clinton compared Obamas win in SC to Jesse Jackson?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by atheist (February 26, 2008 3:08 pm ET)
                   

                Are you confusing Bill Clinton with Hillary Clinton ?

                And exactly what was racist about Bill Clinton's remarks ?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by JLyons (February 26, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
                     

                  i think you misunderstand what the word "campaign" and "Staff" mean.

                  If you want to have a discussion let me know, if you want to play games keep talking.

                   

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by JLyons (February 26, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
                     

                  i think you misunderstand what the word "campaign" and "Staff" mean.

                  If you want to have a discussion let me know, if you want to play games keep talking.

                   

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by jeter2 (February 26, 2008 3:16 pm ET)
                     

                  Atheist,

                  The media has accomplished what they set out to do...fry Hillary & annoint Obama.

                   

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by dbeden4153 (February 26, 2008 3:24 pm ET)
                       

                    "The media has accomplished what they set out to do...fry Hillary & annoint Obama."

                    -J2

                    I'll challenge that.  I believe it was only 3 months ago that Hillary had it "locked up" and may as well "be inaugurated now."  Remember that?  

                    Hillary did it to herself, with a little help from her husband (ok, a lot of help from her husband.) 

                     

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (February 26, 2008 3:26 pm ET)
                         

                      Good point.

                      I think much of it had to do with the public's, most notably Democrats, soft appetite for Hillary Clinton and her sense of entitlement where her party's nomination was concerned, 

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by solon (February 27, 2008 3:07 pm ET)
                           
                        I agree I think what support there is for Hillary among Democrats is very shallow. They are WILLING to support her but would quickly support a viable alternative. She rankles a lot of people on both sides. I would support a woman in a heartbeat but I dont know ANY of my more liberal friends that really like Hillary.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by jeter2 (February 26, 2008 3:38 pm ET)
                         

                      I'll challenge that.  I believe it was only 3 months ago that Hillary had it "locked up" and may as well "be inaugurated now."  Remember that?  

                      Yeah, & thanks to the media twisting everything either Clinton said while slamming her for her voice, laugh, clothing & God knows what else...all the while gushing & fawning over Obama is what helped changed the entire campaign.

                      That's what I've observed. Maybe you saw it differently?

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by dbeden4153 (February 26, 2008 4:24 pm ET)
                           

                        gushing and fawning?  Obama's been falsely labeled Muslim more times than you can count.  The "he's not patriotic enough" line has been thrown around a lot.  His campaign has been attacked because there's no substance.

                        I guess what I'm getting at is he hasn't gotten a free ride by any means.  Clinton may have faired worse in the media than Obama, but they aren't "gushing" over him. 

                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (February 26, 2008 5:06 pm ET)
                           

                        That's what I've observed. Maybe you saw it differently?

                        Jeter, I agree that some of the media coverage of Hillary has been totally unfair (thighs, laugh, crying) but some of their coverage is the fault of Hillary, Bill and their campaign. Bill Clinton can not pass a microphone without speaking and he doesn't always think before he speaks. That is not entirely the fault of the media after all the purpose of putting Bill front and center was the media coverage he would automatically give to her campaign.  

                        I think that Hillary like Rudy assumed that she would be the inevitable nominee. THAT was her biggest mistake and the reason she finds herself exactly where she is. It's not all the medias fault. Hillary has ran a lousy campaign. 

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by heru (February 26, 2008 6:22 pm ET)
                             

                          Boo hoo poor Hillary Clinton started out with $100 million, a beloved Presidential campaigner, and a media assumption that she had no real competition. If you can't mount a winning campaign with all that you cartainly can't run a superpower.

                          Ultimately the real problem with Clinton is that she's just not as good as Obama. Thats why she can't win. Anybody who couldn't pass the DC Bar should have realized that it would be difficult, to say the least, to compete at any level with a former President of the Harvard Law Review.

                          Report Abuse
              • Author by lostlogic (February 26, 2008 6:01 pm ET)
                   

                Well if you want to make the ridiculous charges against CLinton that have no basis in realty sure lets trow 'em at Obama too...One of his surrogates came out and made remarks that at least Obama wouldn't get all emotional anmd weepy, Obama himself siad Clinton has the claws out, Obama himself claimed when Clinton is FEELING down she lashes out...so yeah if we want to take these ridiculous extremes you are taking against CLinton we can do the same for Obama...all of it is nonsense...folks get some perspective we can twist tons of comments to make stupid allegations against them both...but why do you wnat to go there...neither of them are racist or sexist and do you really think they think they can benefit in a DEMOCRATIC primary by trying to exhibit either characteristic. 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by atheist (February 28, 2008 1:28 pm ET)
                     
                  It's the Hillary-bashing Dems who are making me sit out the election in November if Obama gets the nomination.  I'm not even going to vote, for the first time since being allowed to.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by atheist (February 26, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
         

      Gloria Steinem was right on when she wrote her "Women Are Never Front Runners" op-ed in the New York Times.

       

      So why is the sex barrier not taken as seriously as the racial one? The reasons are as pervasive as the air we breathe: because sexism is still confused with nature as racism once was; because anything that affects males is seen as more serious than anything that affects “only” the female half of the human race; because children are still raised mostly by women (to put it mildly) so men especially tend to feel they are regressing to childhood when dealing with a powerful woman; because racism stereotyped black men as more “masculine” for so long that some white men find their presence to be masculinity-affirming (as long as there aren’t too many of them); and because there is still no “right” way to be a woman in public power without being considered a you-know-what.

       

      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/opinion/08steinem.html 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hemlock4007318 (February 26, 2008 3:13 pm ET)
         

      Buchanaon just stated a known part of American society.  It does not mean he believes it is the way it should be, it just is.  Do you want to hear his opinion or stick your heads in the sand because he said something not politically correct even though it is a reality.

      Vince in AZ

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (February 27, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
           
        No he stated his sexist neandrathal opinion, do you want to see the reality or keep YOUR head in that dark, dank, portion of you anatomy that you pulled that opinion of yours from.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (February 26, 2008 3:20 pm ET)
         
      Another senseless panel discussion conducted by clueless people enraptured by their own half-witted monologues.

      They don't enlighten or inform, so why are they droning on and given air time over & over?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by juliajayne (February 26, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
           

        Because it the circus mentality.

        It is a circus/carnival with an unusually large number of carnival barkers (Chris Matthews), side show freaks (Anne Coulter), clowns (O'Reilly, Beck, too many to list). There are the high wire acts (Blitzer and Scarborough) and the animal acts like Chris Matthews doubling as the braying DONkey, Tucker Carlson as the lovable ape, Then there's the guy on the tiny trike (Dobbs) trying to make a circle around the tent so nobody but circus folk get in.

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         sane people can get in.

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 26, 2008 3:51 pm ET)
         
      Just wondering if Hillary Clinton would get the same criticism if her demeanor was more masculine and she had a deep voice. Probably not. But then she'd be called something else. A lot of these shots against Hillary seem to come from guys with fears of alimony.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (February 26, 2008 4:24 pm ET)
           

        The only Hillary who would have had a chance is Hilary Swank – cause Boys Don’t Cry - or have screechy voices, or come across as bitc#y when they argue.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Cartoon Messiah (February 26, 2008 5:19 pm ET)
         

      I realized finally today what a difficult situation Hillary Clinton has been put in by the media. One the one hand, it is necessary for her to prove that she is as tough and commanding as any male candidate. One the other, she is admonished and attacked for being a b**ch and the 'kind of wife every husband fears' and a 'ball-breaker'. If she shows emotion, she is a weak female; if she remains implacable she is labeled as cold. It doesn't surprise me that her campaign is coming undone under the strain.

      The greatest hurdle that women will have to overcome is the silly notion that they have to behave like men to achieve their goals.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by lostlogic (February 26, 2008 6:12 pm ET)
           
        I think you hit the nail on the head.  She is really between a rock and a hard place.  I think in the face of what she has had to deal with she has done remarkebly well...win or lose.  SHe has faced the issues of how best to present a woman cnadidate, a openly biased and hostile media, and the favorite punching bag of the right.  And look at the numbers she has pulled in and the overwhelming support she has received from the voters.  Having said that I think Obama's campaign has hit on a brilliant message and he deserves kudos for the strategy they employed to get there...he had his own set of hurtles to work around and while I feel he was given an advantage with the media (except the right winger wackos) you still can't deny him the kudos for what he has accomplished. 
        Report Abuse
    • Author by heru (February 26, 2008 6:12 pm ET)
         

      Don't act like being female has no political advantages. Hillary has also played to her advantage how bad a woman can make a man look when she argues with him in public. In New Hampshire she channeled Scarlet O'Hara with crocodile tears to get people rallying to her defense from the mean ole men ganging up on her.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (February 27, 2008 10:12 am ET)
           
        If you castigated Boehner for his "crocodile tears" on the House floor, you get a pass.  Otherwise, you've made CM's point.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ashrakay2830 (February 26, 2008 6:59 pm ET)
         
      I can't deny it was the first thing that I thought about.  
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bmart50274 (February 27, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
         
      Unreal.... Buchanan has a lot of nerve.  Has he ever listened to himself screech? My God, the man must be as dense as concrete.  His voice is far more grating than Hillary Clinton's will ever be.  I get a kick out of him when he talks about her voice, because I think both he and Chris Matthews hold the prizes for screechy annoying voices.  REALLY.....Buchanan is quote laughable on this.... 
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.