Even after McCain retracts Iraq war statement, Blitzer calls it "straight talk"
SUMMARY: On CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer and correspondent Dana Bash both characterized as "straight talk" Sen. John McCain's assertion that he will "lose" the presidential election if, as Bash reported, "he doesn't convince voters that the U.S. policy in Iraq is succeeding" -- even though they acknowledged McCain immediately retracted the statement.
On the February 25 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer said that an assertion about Sen. John McCain's presidential prospects that McCain made and then quickly retracted was "a lot of straight talk." Blitzer introduced a report by CNN congressional correspondent Dana Bash by asserting, "There was a lot of, I guess a lot of straight talk from John McCain today, but some are suggesting maybe it was a little too much straight talk. What exactly happened?" Bash responded: "Well, John McCain himself quickly realized it was too much straight talk, Wolf. What he did is, on his bus with reporters, John McCain said that if he doesn't convince voters that the U.S. policy in Iraq is succeeding, he said, quote, 'Then I lose. I lose.' But then immediately, he said he wanted to retract that 'I'll lose' prediction."
Roughly two hours later on The Situation Room, Blitzer, discussing the same assertion with Bash, said: "There was some straight talk, very straight talk, from John McCain today. Then, he seemed to backtrack a little bit. What happened?" Bash responded: "He realized his straight talk was too straight, Wolf."
Media Matters for America has documented numerous instances of CNN personalities, including Blitzer, uncritically referring to McCain's "straight talk" despite McCain's flip-flops and ever-growing list of false assertions. Media Matters also documented numerous instances in which CNN personalities have referred to McCain as a "maverick."
From the February 25 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
BLITZER: The likely Republican nominee, John McCain, is drawing a new line in the sand today over Iraq. He offered a blunt prediction about how the war could impact his prospects for winning the general election. Dana Bash is covering the McCain campaign. She's joining us now from Ohio as well.
There was a lot of, I guess a lot of straight talk from John McCain today, but some are suggesting maybe it was a little too much straight talk. What exactly happened?
BASH: Well, John McCain himself quickly realized it was too much straight talk, Wolf. What he did is, on his bus with reporters, John McCain said that if he doesn't convince voters that the U.S. policy in Iraq is succeeding, he said, quote, "Then I lose. I lose." But then immediately, he said he wanted to retract that "I'll lose" prediction. But it was clear even earlier today, Wolf, at a town hall meeting outside Cleveland that John McCain understands that the way things are going in Iraq and his ability to convince people that things are going better in Iraq very much will determine how people judge his candidacy.
[...]
BLITZER: Plus, John McCain's Iraq warning -- he briefly suggests the war might cost him the White House. Is this straight talk tripping him up?
[...]
BLITZER: The likely Republican nominee, John McCain, is drawing a new line in the sand today over Iraq. He offered a blunt prediction about how the war could impact his prospects for winning the general election. Dana Bash is covering McCain. She's in Ohio as well.
There was some straight talk, very straight talk, from John McCain today. Then, he seemed to backtrack a little bit. What happened?
BASH: He realized his straight talk was too straight, Wolf. And now what John McCain told reporters on his bus earlier today that -- is that if the U.S. strategy in Iraq does not succeed militarily, he said in terms of his political future: "Then I lose. I lose."
But he immediately backtracked and said that he wanted to retract that "I lose" statement -- prediction. But, you know, I just asked him here at the Colonial Eatery, where John McCain just left gathering with voters in Parma, Ohio -- I asked him about that statement on his bus. And he said, "Look, clearly my fortunes are tied to what's happening in Iraq." He understands that, and that sentiment was abundantly clear earlier today with voters.















Did anyone see the poll of pundits at Hardball by Matthews where 8 out 12 thought the NYT's article about McCains intimate relations lobbyist was a non issue and wpuld not hurt him. Amazing isn't it! They have decided it won't hurt him ,because they will continue to downplay it as just a sex scandal instead hyprocrisy and influence peddling. It won't hurt them because they won't cover it, they seem to be saying. Despite his flip-flops, outright lies and numerous examples of his two-facedness they still offer us this "straight" talk BS. The same guys during the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections offered up GB's ignorance as the same straight talk. I mean these guys jump over hurdles, as this latest example shows ,to push this BS. Jeez, they and McCain need to get a room,this public display is embarrassing to watch.
Don’t feel bad Conger. I have a medical condition that causes my mind to transpose letters and sometimes words as I type. I usually use Word 2007 with full spell and grammar checking and STILL sometimes miss grammatical errors. Welcome to the world of real-time blogging. It sure would be nice if MMFA added an “edit” button to allow you to edit a post after the fact. Depending on how they store the data (text file, csv, xml, database, etc.) this could be a relatively easy thing to do. Maybe if enough of us complain…?
Let me add this about Wolf Blitzer and CNN... I'm starting to sometimes detect a little sarcasm in their voices and a stifled smirk on their faces when Blitzer and others refer to McCain's alleged straight talk. They haven't unloaded on McCain yet and they still seem to go easy on him but I don't think they're really buying. Stay tuned...
IRONY: This wasn't "honesty" as you and I think it. This is the first McCain trait that will rise to the surface should he be elected. He has a way of sometimes not thinking before he speaks – many of us see that now – but it would become blatantly obvious once the guy is the center of the world's attention. It's the same thing with his "temper" - it can come out when least expected.
Maybe we will just get lucky and he’ll blurt out something so stupid it kills his whole campaign.
Media Matters does not link to a website where one can verify that McCain's comments constituted a retraction. All we see is hearsay: Blitzer saying that McCain seemed to backtrack a little bit.
Did Media Matters just lie to the public? Probably.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/mccain
There's what he said. He even says "...I'd like to retract 'I'll lose" after saying that he would. Just because MMFA didn't link to another story with his full comments (probably because Bash already gave the "Then I'll lose. I'll lose" quote) doesn't mean they "lied." Try looking it up for yourself before saying MM lied to anyone.
re·tract [ri-trakt]
–verb (used with object)
1.to withdraw (a statement, opinion, etc.) as inaccurate or unjustified, esp. formally or explicitly; take back. 2.to withdraw or revoke (a decree, promise, etc.). –verb (used without object) 3.to draw or shrink back. 4.to withdraw a promise, vow, etc. 5.to make a disavowal of a statement, opinion, etc.; recant.My guess is he would retract it using the definition of the word "retract."
You know what, let me correct myself: Media Matters did lie to the public by saying McCain backtracked on his 100 years comments.
That is the reason why Media Matters chose not to quote McCain directly.
Truth (sic), I'm not sure which part of this you're having trouble with, or if you're just trying to save face by veering off into the 100 year war thing (not sure what you're referrring to there, but here is a full explanation and account of McCain's comments, including;
"If I may, I'd like to retract 'I'll lose.' But I don't think there's any doubt that how they judge Iraq will have a direct relation to their judgment of me, my support of the surge," McCain added. "Clearly, I am tied to it to a large degree."
You've already been given a definition of "retract", all of the tools are there for you.If you don't really need help, and are just creating a diversion out of embarrassment, disregard all of this.
Truthy wants a full McCain quote. Here you go:
CINCINNATI -- Tonight, John McCain clarified comments he made earlier when he said he would "lose" the election if he couldn’t convince Americans that U.S. policy was succeeding in Iraq. He later retracted the finality of that statement and acknowledged that the war in Iraq will be an important issue in the election.
“I quickly retracted that. I was not allowed to retract it obviously,” he joked.
“I don’t mean that I’ll lose. I mean that it’s an important issue in the judgment of the American voters and I hope that clarifies ... It’s not often that I retract a comment. I retracted the finality of that statement, I think that the issue of the war in Iraq is important to the American people and it will be a major factor in their determining who they are going to support in the election in November. If I get the nomination,” he said.
So, truthy, do you have any accusation's you'd like to retract?