About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Media diagnose Hillary "Sybil" Clinton with "mood swings," depression, and "multiple personality disorder"

February 27, 2008 8:21 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: In recent days, members of the media asserted that Sen. Hillary Clinton displayed "mood swings," "could be depressed," "[r]esembl[ed] someone with multiple personality disorder," and "has turned into Sybil."

47 Comments

Between February 25 and February 27, members of the media asserted Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton displayed "mood swings," "could be depressed," "[r]esembl[ed] someone with multiple personality disorder," and "has turned into Sybil," an apparent reference to a book and movie about a woman who developed multiple personality disorder after being severely abused as a child. Asserting in a February 25 National Review Online blog post that Clinton has displayed "erratic, roller-coaster, mood swings these past few weeks," CNBC host Lawrence Kudlow wrote: "Now I'm no psychiatrist, far from it, but I think a simple answer is that Senator Clinton could be depressed." Kudlow added, "Maybe Hillary's taking meds, but they're just not working for her? Could that be why she's always attacking Big Pharma?" In a February 27 New York Times column, Maureen Dowd claimed that Clinton "has turned into Sybil." Dowd added: "We've had Experienced Hillary, Soft Hillary, Hard Hillary, Misty Hillary, Sarcastic Hillary, Joined-at-the-Hip-to-Bill Hillary, Her-Own-Person-Who-Just-Happens-to-Be-Married-to-a-Former-President Hillary, It's-My-Turn Hillary, Cuddly Hillary, Let's-Get-Down-in-the-Dirt-and-Fight-Like-Dogs Hillary. Just as in the White House, when her cascading images and hairstyles became dizzying and unsettling, suggesting that the first lady woke up every day struggling to create a persona, now she seems to think there is a political solution to her problem." On the February 26 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, commentator Jack Cafferty claimed Clinton "[r]esembl[ed] someone with multiple personality disorder." And on the February 25 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, host Chris Matthews declared: "I mean, most people have mood swings and attitude swings, which, I have to say in my case, change radically time to time, but to go from basically applauding him [Sen. Barack Obama] as a human being to saying he ought to be ashamed of himself is a wicked turn of tone, I think. But you say what you think." Chicago Tribune reporter Jill Zuckman responded: "It comes across as a little schizophrenic."

As Media Matters for America has documented, in her 2007 book The Extreme Makeover of Hillary (Rodham) Clinton (Regnery Publishing), Republican strategist Bay Buchanan suggested that Clinton may have a disorder "involving narcissistic personality style" and was quoted in an article on the book as saying, "[W]e are talking about a clinical condition that could make her [Clinton] dangerously ill-suited to become President and Commander-in-Chief."

Additionally, as Media Matters documented in 2004, following a speech in which former Vice President Al Gore called for the resignation of six top Bush administration officials, pundits claimed that Gore "has gone off his lithium again," that "half the country thinks he's a mental patient," that he "is insane" and "needs medication," and "that if he is already on medication, his doctors need to adjust it or change it entirely."

Kudlow's February 25 blog post, headlined "Hillary's Mental Roller Coaster":

Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed Hillary's erratic, roller-coaster, mood swings these past few weeks?

She's all over the map. Irritable and angry. Manic. Pessimistic and sad. One minute she's shedding tears, the next minute she's shouting and attacking, then she's sarcastically ripping on Obama, and on and on it goes.

So, is Hillary depressed?

Now I'm no psychiatrist, far from it, but I think a simple answer is that Senator Clinton could be depressed. She seems deflated. Down in the dumps.

Look, depression is a serious problem. It's also a multibillion-dollar business. Three of the more popular drugs in the market today to treat it are Pfizer's Zoloft, Eli Lilly's Prozac, and GlaxoSmithKline's Paxil. Maybe Hillary's taking meds, but they're just not working for her? Could that be why she's always attacking Big Pharma?

From Dowd's February 27 New York Times column:

After saying she found her "voice" in New Hampshire, she has turned into Sybil. We've had Experienced Hillary, Soft Hillary, Hard Hillary, Misty Hillary, Sarcastic Hillary, Joined-at-the-Hip-to-Bill Hillary, Her-Own-Person-Who-Just-Happens-to-Be-Married-to-a-Former-President Hillary, It's-My-Turn Hillary, Cuddly Hillary, Let's-Get-Down-in-the-Dirt-and-Fight-Like-Dogs Hillary.

Just as in the White House, when her cascading images and hairstyles became dizzying and unsettling, suggesting that the first lady woke up every day struggling to create a persona, now she seems to think there is a political solution to her problem. If she can only change this or that about her persona, or tear down this or that about Obama's. But the whirlwind of changes and charges gets wearing.

From the February 26 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

CAFFERTY: Hillary Clinton has her work cut out for her when it comes to that debate tonight in Cleveland, Ohio. If she has any hope of closing the gap on front-runner Barack Obama next Tuesday in Texas and Ohio, Clinton's got to deliver a big night tonight, a really big night.

The question is, which Hillary Clinton's going to show up? In the last few days, we've just about seen it all. At Thursday's debate in Austin, Texas, Clinton showed a softer side, saying that she was honored to be there with Barack Obama. A couple of days later, she morphed into a scolding mother, talking down to a child, waving her finger and saying, "Shame on you, Barack Obama." She called him out, demanding that he meet her in Ohio for a debate on his tactics and behavior in the campaign.

She wasn't finished. Resembling someone with multiple personality disorder, last Sunday, Clinton mocked Obama, derided his calls for unity. She made fun of him, as though his 11 straight victories in the primaries meant nothing.

From the February 25 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:

MATTHEWS: Let me, Chrystia, to start with this, and then I want to go to Jill and then Susan [Page, USA Today Washington bureau chief]. What is Senator Clinton's endgame here that seems to have started on Saturday? Telling Barack Obama because of some literature he's put out in Ohio that he ought to be ashamed of himself. Very strong language. What is up?

CHRYSTIA FREELAND (Financial Times managing editor): Well, we did see a really interesting change over the weekend. You know, and if you think about the Texas debates, where she was almost valedictorian, quite gentle, quite elegiac in how she treated Senator Obama, and then over the weekend, we saw two new tones.

MATTHEWS: Let's take a look at this two tone here, both the one on Thursday, then the one on Saturday.

CLINTON [video clip]: And, you know, no matter what happens in this contest -- and I am honored -- I am honored to be here with Barack Obama. I am absolutely honored. [video break] Shame on you, Barack Obama. It is time you ran a campaign consistent with your messages in public.

MATTHEWS: Jill, what do we make of that? I mean, most people have mood swings and attitude swings, which, I have to say in my case, change radically time to time, but to go from basically applauding him as a human being to saying he ought to be ashamed of himself is a wicked turn of tone, I think. But you say what you think.

ZUCKMAN: It comes across as a little schizophrenic. I think that the Clinton campaign is trying everything they can possibly try to stop his momentum. And I think the other thing is, he is going on offense against Senator Clinton when it comes to NAFTA. In Ohio, a state that's been so badly hurt by the loss of manufacturing jobs, NAFTA's a four-letter word, and if you let that concept take hold, that you're for that, then you're in deep trouble.

I mean, she's only up at this point by about 11 points, compared to 20 points maybe a week ago. So, she's got to do everything she can to hold on to that.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Clevenative (February 27, 2008 8:24 pm ET)
         
      I hope none of these idiots are McCain supporters. When it comes to mental issues, I don't think they don't wanna "go there".
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 28, 2008 12:10 pm ET)
           
        Lets investigate their allegiance. i am sure Media matters has the resources to find out. One has to have a PHd degree to properly analyse one's mental state and I don't think a journalistic degree qualifies. I really would encourage those people to pursue other careers, instead of attempts to derails others. there is nothing wrong with Hillary Clinton, she raised an outsatnding daughter who is an asset to american intellect.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Clevenative (February 28, 2008 12:19 pm ET)
             

          there is nothing wrong with Hillary Clinton, she raised an outsatnding daughter who is an asset to american intellect.

          I think you should have prefaced this with "Unlike some 'presidential material'..."? :) 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 28, 2008 12:29 pm ET)
               

            I am guessing asking Mccain why is he running and expecting a true answer is too much to ask. " stay the course ' is easy governance, intellect not required..

            Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 27, 2008 8:26 pm ET)
         
      They left out restless leg syndrome... ;>)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (February 27, 2008 8:43 pm ET)
           

        This is my favorite part:

        I mean, she's only up at this point by about 11 points, compared to 20 points maybe a week ago. So, she's got to do everything she can to hold on to that.

        Why, what a loser she is! She should just drop out, right now!

        (P.S. and she was never up by 20 points "maybe a week ago...")

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by philib (February 28, 2008 1:21 am ET)
             

          "Why, what a loser she is! She should just drop out, right now! "

             Actually, I think that would be a good idea. The democratic party needs to show solidarity and conformity. If all we get for the next couple months is bickering between the two then the dems will lose. She should bow out, Obama is obviously 'the chosen one' this time. The dem party needs to rally around one person and get a clean, precise plan going. It seems like each day a different party leader chooses one or the other to support. How does that look to the American people when the democrats can't even make up their own mind as to which clone to support?

            IMHO

          Report Abuse
          • Author by ConstanceRifleII (February 28, 2008 10:16 am ET)
               

            I don't believe the Democratic party leaders are "switching back and forth" between the two candidates.  All I've heard is superdelegates who were once backing Clinton now going over to Obama.

            I say let the Democratic process play out...but then again, I don't think the Democratic primaries are very...democratic. 

            Report Abuse
          • Author by seeryer (February 28, 2008 12:08 pm ET)
               
            Well then have Obama name her as his VP.  For Democratic Party unity and all?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (February 28, 2008 12:23 pm ET)
               
            I dont think it is that clearcut. I also dont think a close primary or contested primary is any problem. It allows for thrashing out the differences between different party factions its not like its heading toward a party split. The Dems have always been a party of factions I never thought that was a bad thing. IF Hillary loses California it will be time to pack it up. If it keeps going back and forth I dont think that has a downside. The one thing I DONT want to see is a brokered convention.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by philib (February 29, 2008 12:51 am ET)
                 

              "IF Hillary loses California it will be time to pack it up."

                 Uhhh, wasn't California done about 2-3 weeks ago?? That's twice you've mentioned the Cal primary after it's been over. Are you even keeping up with the election?

              Report Abuse
          • Author by MB141 (February 28, 2008 4:49 pm ET)
               

            How does that look to the American people when the democrats can't even make up their own mind as to which clone to support?

             That's funny...how does it look when Republicans don't even support their own candidate?  McCain's run is about as exciting as Bob Dole's, but I guess you have a problem with a party trying to decide between two strong candidates.  Isn't that what primaries are for?  Don't worry, though, we'll figure it out soon enough...

            Report Abuse
            • Author by philib (February 29, 2008 8:14 am ET)
                 

                Strong? If they wanted a strong candidate, they would have chosen people who aren't afraid to have their own opinion and ideas. But, no. They chose 2 that are a continuation of status quo in our government and puppets with no urge to do what's right for America.

                 You got one who is threatening to bomb a sovereign nation and install a puppet government if their people don't behave as he expects them to. And you got another who will force ALL people (whether they can afford it or not) to join a health care system that doesn't even have doctors committing to the program. Oh yeah! 2 "strong" candidates.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by arebeeo (February 27, 2008 8:31 pm ET)
         
      These alleged journalists would never think of saying these things about a man.  And I am sure there has been male candidates go through similar situations during a campaign.  It just goes to show how far we are from equality of the sexes.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by atheist (February 28, 2008 1:26 pm ET)
           

        RIGHT !

        Why is it that a man is allowed to display a wide range of emotions but a woman is not ? 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by lostlogic (February 27, 2008 8:32 pm ET)
         
      Gee I thought the problem was she was cold and robotic...apparently now that they have found she is indeed human and capable of an entire range of emotive reposnses in response to different situations and events they are surprised that she is actually just like everyone else--human.  These people need to get a grip.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (February 28, 2008 12:25 pm ET)
           
        If she is unemotional that will be a problem if she is emotional that will be a problem if she is tough that is bad if she is soft THAT is bad. IF she has a headcold that would be bad and somehow if she is to healthy THAT will be a problem.  Its the Gore thing all over again with her the talking head herd just doesnt like anything about her.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MiddleLeft (February 28, 2008 1:54 pm ET)
             

          If she is unemotional that will be a problem if she is emotional that will be a problem

          And if by some miracle she shows just the right amount of emotion she is calculating or manipulative.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by philib (February 29, 2008 9:10 am ET)
             

            I think the "problem" is gonna be that she will FORCE you to join (and pay for) a health care system against your will. And punish you if you don't join, whether you can afford it or not. But, of course, our other choice is for someone who has stated he will attack a sovereign nation (and occupy it) when he is elected (sounds like Bush/co all over again).

            THAT is a problem. How do you handle that kind of problem, solon?

          Report Abuse
    • Author by SFnomad (February 27, 2008 8:36 pm ET)
         
      When are they going to start blaming this on PMS?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by vgranucci2016 (February 27, 2008 10:26 pm ET)
           
        or menopause
        Report Abuse
      • Author by asleepinthechapel (February 28, 2008 9:26 am ET)
           

        Actually her opponent already did...

         Remember that comment about how "period"ically she gets down (mood swing No. 1) and the claws come out (mood swing No. 2)? 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (February 27, 2008 8:40 pm ET)
         

      How dare Hillary Clinton campaign against an opponent. She must be disturbed to do so. 

      And how dare Saturday Night Live make fun of us journalists, and isn't it really wierd that Clinton brings that up during the debate? Isn't that right, Howard Fineman? Isn't that right, Keith?

      Yes Chris, it is. What could she possibly be thinking of?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (February 27, 2008 9:14 pm ET)
           

        Good point. I can't think of how many times Tweety's used a SNL clip on his Hardball program. Yet for these pundits, when the jokes is on them, they act like they don't "get it".

        This is the 2nd time this week for Tweety - just like his Monday comments taking issue with Jon Stewart's poking fun of the "Obama' name" issue during the Acadamy Awards. The joke was on him (the media) - and Tweety took it as Stewart poking fun of Obamas name and getting away with something the media is scolded for.

        For a guy who thinks he knows EVERYTHING - a lot of stuff sure flies right over his fat head.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by lostlogic (February 27, 2008 9:32 pm ET)
           
        I don't know if you caught it but there was a panel of like four media people discussing if the allegations had any merit...I guess you can guess that in their professiona judgement there was just no validty to such an absurd claim.  DId noone at the network see a problem with the media analyzing this story...they couldn't find some pundits who weren't involved and were not regular media people...sheesh. BTW I caught Cambell Brown's show today and seems she may not be too happy with the joke being on her...I think everyone of her stories had a negative slant on Clinton.  Although Catrina Vandehoeuvel (sorry about the spelling) hardly a Clinton supporter stood up and set Brown straight on the stuff Clinton has had to put up with from the media...Brown didn't look to pleased.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (February 27, 2008 9:38 pm ET)
             
          Glad to hear that.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by spooky3 (February 27, 2008 11:12 pm ET)
             

          Campbell is married to Dan Senor - Republican. Does that explain anything?

          These "journalists" apparently have decided that they know more about psychology than about journalism. They may be right, but it's faint self-praise. Maybe they should bring a nice, objective "expert" like Dr. Laura on to help bolster their argument.

          And the female journalists who pile on really need to get a clue - the same things that are done openly to H. Clinton are being done to the journalists behind their backs. Out of self-interest alone, they had better start wising up.

           

           

          Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (February 27, 2008 8:49 pm ET)
         

      My God, this woman Hillary needs to be institutionalized! Even POLITICAL PUNDITS don't need a psychiatry sheepskin to diagnose the ass off Hillary's performance over time.

      Let's see ... she gets excited. She is professorial. She's sarcastic. She's gracious. She's upset. She's screaming. She's emotional. She's forceful.

      Oh, wait a minute. That's MY typical day. And a nurse's. And a teacher's. And a coach's. It's NORMAL HUMAN BEHAVIOR, to have different moods in different circumstances. NORMAL.

      Ah, but to Anti-Hillary PUNDITRY, it's a sign of psychological meltdown, schizophrenia, insanity, losing touch with reality.

      What utter bullcrap! Do me a favor, MEDIA. Quit with the psycho-babble and just tell the TRUTH: You support McCain, and wish for Hillary to LOSE.

      Ah hell, that won't do. What would you have to say for the next seven months? It's an exercise in creative writing, figuring out the NEW way to bash, disparage, and criticize Hillary. What a sick way to make a living. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by lostlogic (February 27, 2008 9:34 pm ET)
           
        Nicely done Tex. 
        Report Abuse
      • Author by spooky3 (February 27, 2008 11:14 pm ET)
           
        To say nothing of how you (or anyone else) might behave after months of sleep-deprivation and exhausting, stressful 16 hour days. It's amazing to me that any candidate can do it and not collapse.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by sn0re (February 28, 2008 12:19 am ET)
             
          Obama seems to be handling it quite well.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by frautuck (February 28, 2008 1:18 pm ET)
               
            Right.  And that's because the media has been analyzing and criticizing his every action and utterance as they have done with Clinton???  Not!
            Report Abuse
    • Author by mcnairbo6573 (February 27, 2008 10:09 pm ET)
         
      Well of course they disparaged Hillary at MSNBC.  The Catholic Boys (Matthews and Russert) that run that station want a republican to be the next President of the United States.  I'm sure they've grown uccustomed to their tax cuts.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (February 27, 2008 10:19 pm ET)
           
        You're not actually trying to align Catholicism with Republicans are you? - because I think you're gonna have a lot of pissed off Catholics on your hands.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by snoopy (February 27, 2008 10:41 pm ET)
             
          I remember trickled on economics. This catholic is to busy being pissed off about being pissed on that I don't have time to give a piss!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by ultrasanktpauli (February 28, 2008 1:26 am ET)
         
      My old man had an interesting take on Clinton. He, normally a hater of Clinton...in a not so usual rational tone opined that 'think about the Rolling Stones. You got your front man Mick. Mick rages up and down and shakes it and all, but he's the front man. Then you got your drummer Charlie. Charlie doesn't do much but drum. And drum and drum and drum. Hell, he even looks about the same now as he did then. But because Watts is not a big show...you don't really think about him. You need him. But he's just there in the background.'

      He went on to say that Hillary was no doubt a very, very smart woman and a very brilliant politician. However, she is just not a good front man. Everyone needs someone behind the scenes who can twist arms and the like. It's politics. I just think that she's trying to be the frontman of the band when she makes a far far better drummer.

      I thought it was an intersting AND rational point. I'm also glad he didn't compare her to Kieth Richards.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (February 28, 2008 8:42 am ET)
           

        Good analogy – I agree. As much as I like Hillary, she does not come across as “genuine” – I think it’s the phony “teethy” smile that is pasted on her face even while the person right across from her is ripping her a new <insert body part here> is what exemplifies this most. I suppose I’ve always thought all politicians to be phony – but with Hillary her mannerisms make it so blatant I sometimes feel bad for her, thinking, “you can do better than that!”. And then when she does show the correct reaction, she tends to go overboard with her emotions.

        Obama, on the other hand is one COOL cucumber, and about the best orator I’ve ever seen in my lifetime. So ULTRA, in my opinion – the “old man” is right – some people are just “born-leaders” and some are better off sticking to beating the drums.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (February 28, 2008 8:58 am ET)
           

        ULTRA: One other thing – Thank You for making the post that knocked me off the fence. I’ve been caught between Hillary and Obama from day one. I think it is only because this post made me look at my doubts about Hillary as something other than subliminal sexism that I am finally able to hold Obama up as MY candidate – and also, I suppose having managed and promoted a local rock band for 7 years in the late 80’s and 90’s probably has helped me grasp your old man’s analogy and realize the importance of a frontman.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by lostlogic (February 28, 2008 12:46 pm ET)
           
        Interesting take.  I do see it in a similar way but come up with a different conclusion.  I'll stick with the music arena: There was this band in the 80's and they had this knock out singer fronting the band.  She was gorgeous and had a body to die for...unfortunatley it turned out she was just a front she was lip syncing to another woman's voice.  The problem with the other woman was she wasn't attractive...overweight and not much to look at by societies standards...but she had amazing "pipes".  See I think we look to the superficial too much.  I don't want the person that looks good, sounds good, everyone things is great on a simple superficial lever (we got that in Bush).  I want the person that can do the job and knows how to do get in there and get it done no matter how they appear superficially (like we should have got with Gore).  I don't need my elected officials to be my friend or entertain me I need them to do the work I put them there to do.  Anyway that is my take from a different perspective of the same critiria.  Although I do conced the superficial likening does seem to win elections so what do I know /-:
        Report Abuse
    • Author by werner (February 28, 2008 9:19 am ET)
         

      While it may be unfair to diagnose Hillary as if she's a psychiatric patient, I do think that Hillary has inexplicably run a pretty poor campaign from a strategic point of view. These mistakes have included what image she has put across. In 2000 she ran a pretty flawless Senate campaign with the possible exception of the Mrs. Arafat incident. Last year she seemed to be the inevitable nominee and predictions were she would run an largely error free campaign. So what has happened to her is a surprise to everyone it seems. I do think that she made some strategic mistakes as a First Lady but it appeared she had put those days behind her. She does have lots of enemies in the media as even media people have confirmed. But she  has constantly been giving her enemies ammunition. The latest was her, as Obama put it, "whining" at the debate Tuesday evening.  Hopefully, assuming Obama is the nominee, he can deflect the right wing attack machine in a more savvy manner than Hillary has handled the adversity she has faced. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (February 28, 2008 1:03 pm ET)
           

        Werner,

        Very well put, I completely agree.  Hillary certainly has had her share of arrows thrown her way, and considering Obama's kid glove treatment, even more so.

        But she, and her supporters, need to take responsibility for where they are in the campaign as well.  Granted, nobody could have foreseen the phenom that Obama is, but if candidates win or lose it's basically due to the success or failure of their own campaign, their message, their strategy and their connection with voters.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by commonsenseliberal (February 28, 2008 12:01 pm ET)
         

      Oh...so now the media are psychiatrists? 

      What ever happened to reporting the news?

      Ahh..never mind...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ellie_may12942 (February 28, 2008 1:02 pm ET)
         

      Poor little Hillary is being diagnosed by the media (hmmm. . kind of like Brittney Spears). Isn't that what the media does? Reporting their political bias? Giving you sound bytes of information and not showing the entire truth.

      On the other hand, when Hillary cries or changes moods, she makes all the old anti-feminist beliefs about women come true.

      Where is the out cry for Barak "putting the media on notice?"

      Report Abuse
    • Author by frautuck (February 28, 2008 1:13 pm ET)
         
      The Saturday Night Live folks said it better than I, but the fact is that Obama has benefited from both a largely uncritical (of him) news media and the steady drumbeat of media criticism of Hillary Clinton.  Over time that has an effect.  One we're now seeing where its all adulation of Obama and dismissal of Clinton.  And, all that free to Obama!  He really owes them a debt of gratitude.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by writingindependence (February 28, 2008 2:32 pm ET)
         
      Imagine old hell-on-wheels having to put a cap on her volcano, after the monkey-biz of the past eight years... She needs to possibly forgo the limitations of office contention unless invited to be Madam Vice President along with Democratic Presidential Candidate Obama. Then she can go as crazy as Dick Chenny taking out corporate trash piled so high it would take a geodetic survey to comprehend.

      ...example...

      Ashcroft Agrees to Congressional Smoke and Mirrors Session

      The man who insisted the 2001 Anthrax Attacks had at least one most remarkable "person of interest" Stephen J. Hatfill, will instead pay a penance to the empire for some trivial consultancy relations with a company that offers its customers kickbacks.

      Kind of going a long way to obstruct with more fiddle-dee-dee. Your government taxes hard at work protecting your lives and families...

      (page 4 of pdf article)

      http://www.freewebs.com/writingindependence/PostAnthrax04.pdf

      --

      www.freewebs.com/writingindependence/main.htm
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thedailyphosdex (February 28, 2008 2:37 pm ET)
         

      Could the same be said of Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty in the wake of a recent veto override?

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.