About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hannity repeatedly distorts passage in Michelle Obama's senior thesis to suggest alumni views on race are her own

February 29, 2008 3:04 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: In recent broadcasts of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, Sean Hannity has repeatedly distorted a passage from Michelle Obama's 1985 Princeton senior thesis to suggest that Obama was asserting her own views when she wrote that "[i]t is possible that Black individuals either chose to or felt pressure to come together with other Blacks on campus because of the belief that Blacks must join in solidarity to combat a White oppressor."

30 Comments

In the past week on Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, co-host Sean Hannity has repeatedly distorted what Michelle Obama wrote in 1985 in her Princeton senior thesis, focusing on the presence in the thesis of the words: "because of the belief that Blacks must join in solidarity to combat a White oppressor." But the full paragraph in the thesis makes clear that Obama was purporting to document attitudes among black Princeton alumni who attended the school in the 70s, and not asserting her own views. Yet Hannity has repeatedly taken the phrase out of context to suggest that Obama has divisive views of race.

For example:

  • On February 25, Hannity said, "And then we've discovered that Michelle Obama, who made this comment last week when she said she felt proud of her country for the first time in her life, she, in her thesis at Princeton, wrote the following talking about -- she said "because of the belief that blacks must join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor," she talked about why African-Americans joined together at Princeton. Is race going to now be an issue for them?"
  • On February 26, while discussing the Obamas with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA), Hannity asserted: "she had written this thesis while she was at Princeton, where she talked about, quote, "blacks must join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor." Later, in a separate segment, Hannity said to his guests: "[Obama's] wife in her thesis at Princeton said, quote, 'Blacks must join in solidarity -- the belief that blacks must join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor.' On top of -- on heels -- on the heels of the statement, "For the first time in my life, I'm proud to be an American." Does that -- do those racial issues concern people?"
  • On February 27, Hannity asked former White House senior political adviser Karl Rove, "When you add that to the comments of his wife about 'the first time in my adult life, I'm proud to be an American,' the use of the word 'white oppressor' in her thesis -- do you think the people are going to respond negatively to all of this?"

But, contrary to Hannity's suggestion, Obama was not asserting that "blacks must join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor." Those words are part of the following passage:

As discussed earlier, most respondents were attending Princeton during the 70's, at a time when the Black Power Movement was still influencing the attitudes of many Blacks.

It is possible that Black individuals either chose to or felt pressure to come together with other Blacks on campus because of the belief that Blacks must join in solidarity to combat a White oppressor. As the few blacks in a white environment it is understandable that respondents might have felt a need to look out for one another.

Obama went on to write: "One can contrast the mood of the campus years ago and the level of attachment to Blacks to that of the present mood of the campus [in 1985] which is more pro-integrationist." Obama's thesis was based on a questionnaire sent to Princeton alumni to assess how their attitudes about the "Black and White communities," among other things, have changed over time.

Further, on February 25, co-host Alan Colmes introduced a discussion about Michelle Obama by asserting that her patriotism "is being questioned once again, this time because of her senior thesis" without providing a single example of anyone actually questioning Obama's patriotism based on what she wrote in her senior thesis (although he then criticized the focus on her thesis). Moreover, a search* by Media Matters for America found no examples of anyone calling Michelle Obama's patriotism into question because of her senior thesis.

From Michelle Obama's senior thesis, "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community":

Another possible hypothesis created from this study's findings explaining why respondents became attached to Blacks at Princeton is that the mood of Black students at Princeton during the time that most of the respondents were attending Princeton was more separationist. As discussed earlier, most respondents were attending Princeton during the 70's, at a time when the Black Power Movement was still influencing the attitudes of many Blacks.

It is possible that Black individuals either chose to or felt pressure to come together with other Blacks on campus because of the belief that Blacks must join in solidarity to combat a White oppressor. As the few blacks in a white environment it is understandable that respondents might have felt a need to look out for one another.

One can contrast the mood of the campus years ago and the level of attachment to Blacks to that of the present mood of the campus, which is more pro-integrationist, and the level of attachment to Blacks. Presently, with the Black Power Movement behind us and with the implementation of CURL (College Undergraduate Residential Life), the mood of the campus has been shifted in such a way that Black students are discouraged from forming separate groups because of a fear that they are segregating themselves from mainstream campus life by doing so. Thus, if a survey were to be made today of the level of Black involvement in minority organizations and their involvement in campus organizations, there would be a larger percentage of Blacks involved in mainstream life in comparison to the years when these respondents were at Princeton. But, on the other hand, the percentage of involvement in Third World organizations would be much lower now than then. It appears, that the present mood of the campus is one that encourages integration and assimilation of Blacks, whereas the mood of the campus and even society in general several years ago encouraged the separation of Blacks. Thus, the mood of the time may have contributed its influence to more respondents becoming attached to Blacks.

From the February 25 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:

HANNITY: Let me ask you if you think the issue of race is going to be a bigger part in this campaign than it's been to now. Now, we had Barack Obama's pastor on this very show. And he has, for example, the Black Value System that he wants his congregants to commit to. You know, the black family, the black community, the black work ethic, on and on and on.

Louis Farrakhan had nice things to say about him this weekend. And then we've discovered that Michelle Obama, who made this comment last week when she said she felt proud of her country for the first time in her life, she, in her thesis at Princeton, wrote the following talking about -- she said "because of the belief that blacks must join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor," she talked about why African-Americans joined together at Princeton. Is race going to now be an issue for them?

MORRIS: Right. No, I think once you carry Utah and Idaho and North Carolina, you've basically have proven that you're going to get white votes.

From the February 25 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:

COLMES: She's a Princeton University and Harvard Law graduate, a successful lawyer, mother of two. Has Michelle Obama become a liability for her husband's campaign? Last Monday, she came under fire for this comment.

MICHELLE OBAMA [video clip]: For the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change.

COLMES: She later clarified her remarks, but her patriotism is being questioned once again, this time because of her senior thesis, where she writes, "I have found that at Princeton, no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my white professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don't belong. Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first and a student second."

She goes on to say, quote, "Further integration and/or assimilation into a white culture and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant."

With us now, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum and former Tennessee Congressman Harold Ford Jr., both Fox News contributors.

And Congressman Ford, let me go to you first on this. Is this what we can expect in a general election, should Barack Obama be the nominee? They're going to attack Michelle Obama for talking about her black experience and her blackness at a predominantly white school? Is this what they're going to make into a political football?

FORD: If this is the ammunition that the opposing side has against Barack, if he is fortunate and blessed to be the nominee of the party, he's probably going to have an easy time becoming president.

If we're looking back to how students, spouses of presidential candidates, when they were students in elementary and junior high and middle and high school and even college, to determine whether or not their husband or their spouse is fit to be president, I think we've sunk to a new low.

Michelle Obama is a model for what anybody would want their daughter to be. She's smart. Not only a -- wonderfully capable and accomplished academically, but she's an incredible mom.

And I don't fault any spouse for enthusiastically supporting their husband -- his or her husband or wife. I don't fault Bill Clinton for supporting his wife. Nor would I fault Cindy McCain for being avid in her support for her husband. We would expect that.

COLMES: Let me go to Senator Santorum on this. Look, Senator, I mean, the idea that this is going to be what is focused upon in a campaign? Do you think that's a good idea for Republicans to look at her thesis as a student, talking about how she felt as a black, young woman at Princeton, a predominantly white school, where there wasn't -- where there was a very small black studies department? Is this what it's going to be about?

SANTORUM: Well, I hope not. I agree with Harold. First off, I think a spouse's personal life is out of bounds, period, end of discussion. This is something that she did, you know, at an age when, you know, you write some pretty strange stuff sometimes. I hope they don't pull up my college thesis papers.

COLMES: Yeah, that's a great idea.

SANTORUM: I mean, that's -- I'm sure, Alan, you'll now do that.

COLMES: I'm going to Google you as soon as I get off.

SANTORUM: Thank you, thank you. But no, I mean, you write, you know -- you write things in college that, you know, you come back and say, "Oh, boy, was that a stupid thing to write." So, no --

COLMES: But this wasn't even -- this wasn't stupid.

SANTORUM: Well, but -- I'm not saying it was. I'm just saying that it's out of bounds. I mean, it's irrelevant to the discussion. If she's out, as she was on the campaign trail, speaking on behalf of her husband, and she says something at that point and it's in the public-policy realm, fine. Then that's a legitimate point. But to dig out someone's past -- out of bounds, leave it alone, move on.

HANNITY: Hey, Congressman Ford, welcome back, both of you. Senator, good to see you. Welcome to the program.

FORD: Thank you.

HANNITY: Congressman Ford, if you found out Sean Hannity -- let's say I was running for office. And you aren't going to campaign for me, although I'd try to talk you into it.

Now, if I was running for office and you found out I belonged to a church, and as part of the precepts or the value system of my church was a personal commitment to embrace the white value system, and it had 12 points. And some of them were commitment to the white community; commitment to the white family; commitment to the white work ethic; a pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available to the white community; pledge to allocate, regularly, a portion of personal resources for strengthening and supporting white institutions -- would you say that I was part of a separatist church and one that you'd be concerned about for racial reasons?

FORD: If you were part of that, I would ask -- I'd say that's not the Sean I know and would imagine -- would want to know why you were -- or maybe you could explain that to me.

I think what you're getting at is maybe -- I know some of the questions that have been raised about Senator Obama's church.

You know, I'm not one that tries to get -- get in people's sort of faith and religious life. I mean, even when Mitt Romney, who I believe you were supporting for president for a period of time, I mean, there were questions about his religion, which I thought were completely out of bounds.

HANNITY: But this is different. This is a little bit different.

FORD: I don't think --

HANNITY: Let me tell you why this is different. Because this is so important to me --

FORD: The Mormons said that I couldn't go to heaven. Mormons said I couldn't go to heaven for a period of time, and I believe it's been renounced now. But I believed them. Now they believe I can go to heaven. I thought I could go to heaven back then, too, I might add. But I believe them now; they think I can go to heaven. That's not the point.

I think that the issue -- the issue here with Senator Obama, I think, is a little different. And I think in fairness to him, he's made clear he's a Christian. He has made clear throughout his campaign he believes we are all equal, we are all one, and we should operate as that.

HANNITY: Well, I'm a Christian, and I was raised a Catholic. I'm a Christian, and I just believe if you're -- if you have that value system, it's the Christian value system. We're brothers and sisters in Christ. And he's the son of God, and he died to save all of us from our sins. That's my -- what my faith teaches me.

Senator Santorum, but that -- the point is this is the value system of Barack Obama's church. This is -- and its commitment to the black family, the black community, the black value system.

When you couple that with some of the comments that his wife, for example, made this weekend, you know, quote, "to combat white oppression" while she's at Princeton, should people take a look at this? Is that a concern for people?

SANTORUM: Well, I will -- I will answer it the same way I dealt with Mitt Romney, because I think they are similar. I think -- I think it's legitimate to look at it. I think to just say it's invalid, that somehow or another this shouldn't factor into your decision, this is a judgment he made when he joined this church. It's not like he didn't know that.

[crosstalk]

COLMES: Do you want to look into the church of everybody running for office? Do you really want to do that?

From the February 26 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:

HANNITY: Well, the issue of race has come up here, not only those comments by Michelle Obama. She said, "For the first time in my life that I am proud of my country" -- which I think stunned a lot of people. There was also the news that came out this week, Mr. Speaker, that she had written this thesis while she was at Princeton, where she talked about, quote, "blacks must join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor."

There's the issue of Dr. Jeremiah Wright, who was the pastor of Barack Obama's church. And he has this Black Value System, commitment to the black community, the black family, pursuit of the black work ethic. And it goes on and on mentioning all those things. Do you think those issues will become pronounced as the campaign moves forward, or is that the same mistake Hillary Clinton made, and that's attacking him personally?

GINGRICH: Well, I think Senator Obama has to tell us how he deals with all that and how he sees things. You know, on the one hand, you could make the argument that his experience growing up in Hawaii, his experience at Columbia University, his experience at Harvard University were a pretty good deal.

[...]

HANNITY: Let me ask everybody, because the issue of race now has come up in this campaign, and these are very serious issues that affect the country. And more specifically, his pastor gave the controversial -- I would argue racist and anti-Semite -- Louis Farrakhan an award. He asked that his congregation be -- pledge allegiance to the Black Value System, to the black community, the black family, the black work ethic. Some people believe that that is a separatist belief system.

His wife in her thesis at Princeton said, quote, "Blacks must join in solidarity -- the belief that blacks must join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor." On top of -- on heels -- on the heels of the statement, "For the first time in my life, I'm proud to be an American."

Does that -- do those racial issues concern people?

From the February 27 edition of Fox News' Hannity and Colmes:

HANNITY: When you add that to the comments of his wife about "the first time in my adult life, I'm proud to be an American," the use of the word "white oppressor" in her thesis -- do you think the people are going to respond negatively to all of this?

ROVE: Well, what I thought was interesting about his comments about Farrakhan was how narrow he made them. His comment was he disagreed with Minister Farrakhan's anti-Semitic comments. Well, Farrakhan has made a lot more comments besides his very virulent anti-Semitic comments. He has made very racist comments about whites and about the black-white relationships in the United States. And I frankly think he ought to be dismissive of Farrakhan in his totality, not simply --

COLMES: Actually, Karl, he has. In fact -- welcome back to our show, Karl. It's Alan. Thank you for being here tonight. Not just the debate last night, but speaking to a Jewish group -- a group of Jewish leaders in Cleveland last week, he said, "I have been a consistent denunciator of Louis Farrakhan. Nobody challenges that." And that an award given to -- for his work, for example, on behalf of ex-offenders, unrelated to his controversial statements. He talked about his minister doing things with the community, but that he personally repudiated him and, you know, could not control, he said last night at the debate, who endorses him. He can't censor endorsements. I don't know what more he has to say to get people off his back about Louis Farrakhan.

* A Media Matters search of the Nexis database using the search terms "Michelle pre/2 Obama" and "patriot!" and "thesis" or "dissertation," did not find any examples of people calling Michelle Obama's patriotism into question because of her senior thesis.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dbeden4153 (February 29, 2008 3:15 pm ET)
         

      "A Media Matters search of the Nexis database using the search terms "Michelle pre/2 Obama" and "patriot!" and "thesis" or "dissertation," did not find any examples of people calling Michelle Obama's patriotism into question because of her senior thesis."

      Michelle pre/2 Obama?  Is that some sort of Boolean speak on the Nexis database?  I wouldn't know, I'm too cheap and have no reason to invest in a subscription to it.

      And oh, gosh, really? Hannity misquoting someone? no..what?   

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (February 29, 2008 5:27 pm ET)
           

        I've just spent a little time on Google myself. You can find hundreds of links containing "Hannity Thesis" as apparently this is his standard "gotcha" for people he doesn't agree with (Hillary was his most famous victim).

        What I was TRYING to find was HIS thesis - anyone know if it's out there anywhere? I don't really care about readig his his views so much as I just want to check my suspicion that 95% of it was plagiarized. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dazedandconfused26 (February 29, 2008 3:19 pm ET)
         
      Hannity taking quoting a partial statement out of context, and then lying repeatedly about it,  I'm shocked... the sad part is his wide following of brain dead retards will beleive anything he tells them. What a "great american."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by achrispage6992 (February 29, 2008 3:22 pm ET)
           
        Hannity is just jealous because his college drop out hiney never got to write a thesis. If he did and it looked anything like that rag "Let Freedom Ring" then he would had a heck of a time defending that drivel in front of a committee. Let's be honest, he is wildly flailing about for subject matter since he put so much tme in preparing to destroy Hillary. He is gawd awful, that is for sure.  
        Report Abuse
        • Author by slothrop (February 29, 2008 9:11 pm ET)
             
          Indeed, Hannity's own failures in higher education, may be an influence on his disdain of those who earned degrees in college. Hannity was a failure in college and he now attempts to dumb down Americans. The truth is, that Sean Hannity does not have the needed educational background to make informed comments on most of the issues facing this country. Nor does he want such an educational background. Hannity has never been about knowledge, he has been about fear, hate, ignorance and propaganda. If anyone ever tried to read his book, they would realize very quickly that Hannity writes at a very low level--his book was full of poor writing and poor reasoning. It continues apace.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (February 29, 2008 3:21 pm ET)
         
      There must be some equation that gives an indication how much you are divorced from the comon reality. The major variables should be wealth level and how you got that way, and how much time you spend with people who's major function is to tell how great you are.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Kaliman (February 29, 2008 3:22 pm ET)
         

       "...do you think the people are going to respond negatively to all of this?"

      Gee, I don't know, Sean.  Isn't that the point?  How stupid does this a$$clown think people are?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (February 29, 2008 3:23 pm ET)
         

      Hey, I have an idea. If Hannity wants an answer, why doesn't he just invite Michelle onto his show and ask her directly? Then he can get the facts straight from the horses' mouth, so to speak!

      Oops, forgot. That goes against the right's "right" to free speech...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mr. l (February 29, 2008 3:23 pm ET)
         
      Hannity trying to cram this non-issue down everyone's throat is so childish.  And does he really think putting Santorumthroughpittsburgh and Ew Grinch AND Rove is doing ANYTHING to help his stance?  All three are horrible people (although I think Newt is seeing the light slightly more than the others). 
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 29, 2008 3:23 pm ET)
         
      Hannity is a fine stooge to be analysing a thesis when he himself never graduated fron high school and couldn't make it thru divinity school.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc8351 (February 29, 2008 3:37 pm ET)
         
      Is this the same Sean Hannity who appeared at a Giuliani fund raising event?

      The same Sean Hannity who has nothing to do with the Republicans?

      I think it is.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (February 29, 2008 3:55 pm ET)
         
      Colmes does his usual anemic defense here. Its good that MMFA lists the facts rather than dismiss it as just a small issue from the past.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (February 29, 2008 4:40 pm ET)
         

      Maybe Hannity's real problem with Obama's church has a lot more to do with gays and equal marriage and less to do with "Black value System" but hey, gotta pick on something to draw attention to the church.

      United Church of Christ, one of the country's most racially diverse and liberal Protestant denominations -- the first to ordain an openly gay minister and to call for equal marriage rights for all people, regardless of gender.

      The UCC prides itself as being "out front" on social justice issues, battling civil rights, women's rights and gay rights ahead of the mainstream. One Sunday hymnal equally celebrates male and female images of God.

      "Black folks are always playing the victim card, never taking responsibility for themselves or their community." How many freaking times have I heard that crap! Yet when a church requests their members to take responsibility for themselves and their community that's a problem? WTF, black folks are damned if they do and damned it they don't.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by lostlogic (February 29, 2008 7:01 pm ET)
           

        Pearl, I never understood why people thought the message of the church was a bad one. Seems the principles were what most of us would aspire to in any community.  What I have found is there are many "communities who strongly identify on some characterisitc and often have congregations or associations that allow them to gather with those who share there beliefs/history/issues and adversity.  AA have a very strong sense of community it seems and why wouldn't they their race played a big roll in their "story" in this country.  I see it similar in a way to the stregth of cumminity in the Jewish community that is the chracteristic that played a big roll in their story and their sense of community is strong because of it.  I think they strength of the community is directly dependent on the level of adversity due to the shared characteristic they face.  For those who make the comment that if white people endorsed their "community" the way AA's do that no one would stand for it but the thing they are missing is our being white did not play a profound part in our "story" so it makes no sense to relate on that level.  I don't know if I explained this well but it is just something I was thinking about hearing all these wingers complain about the stregth of AA community and complaining about things like this church or even the existance of the Black Caucus in congress...to me they are missing the obvious and it seems they don't get it there is no such thing as a "white community"...there is no need for one.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (March 01, 2008 5:23 am ET)
             

          Lost, what can I say, you get it.

          What some don't understand or pretend not to understand is the "black value system" as it's called at United Church of Christ has been taught in black churches all across America for years and years. They might not have called it that, but teaching shared responsibility and shared prosperity for self, family and community has been the backbone of black families and their church. I don't think it's that different in other churches and they probably don't give it a name either. Maybe some have a problem with the name, "black value system", but it seems to me that churches, whether they're a black Baptist, a white Catholic or a Jewish synagogue have always been available to help the people in their communities. A single mother, a family struggling to put food on the table or a father who was unemployed, the church was available to lend a hand. I've often said that one of the most segregated places in America was church and the racial component of the church often reflects the racial component of the community they serve. Why Obama's church and it's message is causing such concern leaves me speechless. I hope that the complaints about Obama's church are not begin used to paint a unfair picture of Obama as some radical black militant but it's becoming hard not to think that.

           

          Report Abuse
      • Author by spabeles7329 (February 29, 2008 11:06 pm ET)
           
        NOW C'MON .

        Hannity is taking Obama's comments out of context

        HOWEVER the Trinity United Church of Christ--is absolutely, fundamentally a RACIST church. Okay, so they welcome a few white people-great, good to know. But the bottomline is this:

        FLIP IT AROUND: If Clinton worshipped at a church that was all about empowering the WHITE COMMUNITY through a WHITE VALUE SYSTEM who gave DAVID DUKE a lifetime achievement award and whose Pastor/Mentor visited (shall we say?) GERMANY with said DAVID DUKE---Well, I think she'd have a pretty tough row to hoe convincing everyone she wasn't a racist. Now, those of you new to the site-- www. tucc.com-- will miss the really exciting stuff--because that was taken off about a week ago when questions started to be raised (wisely, very wisely)

        There are, however, other indications at least as troubling.

        Obama does now, and has knowingly for years, employed members of the Nation of Islam (KKK staffers in Hillary's office--how would that fly?). I read recently that Farrakhan hates Jews. Absolutely, he hates Jews; but he's an equal opportunity hater (just like his predecessor Malcolm X) he hates most everybody; considering whites"sub-human". Google him; see for yourself.

        Then, of course, there is Senator Obama himself. In a speech in Sumter, SC on 1/24 he borrowed the words (sadly, again without attribution) of Malcolm X ("There will be bamboozling" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuB_W8o_UsU) Mr. X might best be remembered for his speech "The Ballot Box of the Bullet"--not usually considered a model of racial tolerance and outreach for unity.

        So, Mr. Hannity may be a bigot, wrong-headed, uneducated and a very bad man, indeed. But the bottomline: if Obama were white; most of YOU would consider him a racist.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Marker (February 29, 2008 5:02 pm ET)
         
      Hannity is probing how far he can go on the racial themes. He does it on his radio show. McCain let Cunningham do the same thing on his behalf. The repugs are doing it now in an attempt to see what the American people will tolerate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (February 29, 2008 5:16 pm ET)
         

      I just got back from running an errand while listening to Sean Hannity on the radio blasting Democrats for constantly smearing Republicans. Ha...!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (March 01, 2008 9:04 am ET)
           

        How shocking – what REASON would anyone have for bashing Republicans? They’ve done so much good for the country the past 7 years.;)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (February 29, 2008 6:12 pm ET)
         

      RWnut:  She said, "the first time in my adult life, I'm proud to be an American."

      Normal Person:  You left out the word "really" as in "I'm really proud to be an American."

      RWnut:  Well, that doesn't change things.

      Normal Person:  Then why do you keep leaving it out?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by lostlogic (February 29, 2008 6:43 pm ET)
         
      I don't get it.  Does Hannity have a reading comprehension problem.  The parts of her paper he is quoting she is offering reasons for the more segregated as opposed to the more integrated years at the college.  I think MMFA is wrong to deny that it is her own view because it is.  It is one of the hypothesis she gives for what caused the attitude and segregation.  Frankly, it is not a radical view...I would think most could probably offer up a similar reason if they are studying the issue.  It IS how AA fought white oppressors by coming together to fight for their rights and it would make sense that it would take time for that attitude to relax enough for integration to start to take effect.  I think from what I have read of whats out there about her thesis it sounds like of very well thought out and introspective look at the attitudes of the time and if anyone can't see that then they are in denial about this countries history during the civil rights era. 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (March 01, 2008 5:48 am ET)
           
        Lost, my middle daughter attended St Olaf University in Northfield Minnesota in 1974 (don't ask me why a So. Calif. girl would want to live in all that snow). There were 17 black students in her class. I don't think they even thought about the issue of segregation, it was more a feeling of solidarity with the few students who looked like them and had shared experiences. This was also during Affirmative Action where many white students often looked at black students as if they were not qualified to attend they got in the school just because the school needed a "certain" number of black students. Many of the feeling experienced by Michelle Obama are the feeling of many other black college students.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (March 01, 2008 12:52 pm ET)
             

          Hannity is really grasping at straws here - using a 20+ year old college paper as his evidence?

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Clevenative (March 01, 2008 4:32 pm ET)
               
            It's his shtick - he's done it to many of his objects of hate.  He somehow has his sheep believing that the real window into someone's soul is through their thesis. Like I say, I'd love to read his - if he ever actually wrote one.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by big2xrube6146 (February 29, 2008 7:49 pm ET)
         

         Sean is still speading the same old BS. Guess he can't come with any new dirt on anyone. Is there anyone out there that beleives Sean's BS? I Know I don't. What a genuine A_ _ HOLE IDIOT SEAN is.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Blueneck (February 29, 2008 8:00 pm ET)
         
      Expect more of this. I listened to a few minutes of Hannity on my way home from work today (don't ask me why) and it seems the right is almost expecting an Obama run for the White House. Hannity has formed an unholdy alliance with the Heritage Foundation and although this link is from 2004 he is still their favorite darling boy. Click the link only if you want to vomit. The right is mounting a full court press against Obama and it makes you wonder if they know something the rest of us don't. The primaries aren't over yet and money is being burned in great quantities to ramp up the noise machine. Is this proof of some sort of right wing "conspiracy". Of course not. But close links between prominent right wing think tanks and members of the media do have a sinister tone to them. I also think of Limbaugh's "unpaid consultancy" for the Republican party leading up to the 2004 election. It does not prove anything but it is sure creepy. Imagine the outcry if Noam Chomsky were to be given a well paid three hour slot five evenings a week to talk about what he want to talk about--then suddenly Obama or Clinton were to make regular visits to "consult" with him. For Democrats--I think it is a mistake not to mount a potent counter strategy--yet what should it be? And for us: it is almost certain this site will be having visits from hordes of paid trolls and sock puppets for the next several months (I mean aside from the usual suspects who, if they actually earn money holding down a real job, must spend every minute they are not sleeping trying to provoke arguments and employing every logical fallacy known to man trying to disrupt the threads on this site). Oh well--sometimes it is at least entertaining. But in all seriousness I cannot even imagine the damage that will be inflicted on this country by another four or eight years of Republican misrule. Endless war, permanent tax relief for the overclass, the shredding of the Constitution, two or more appointments to the Supreme Court (not to mention the lower courts)--no point in going on--we all know the rest. I am no fan of either Clinton or Obama; but I will work like hell on behalf of whomever is the nominee. I hope all of us will.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (March 02, 2008 9:32 am ET)
           

        You’re right Blueneck – we have a lot of clean-up work to do. Fortunately, we also have the kind of people who are not afraid to get their hands dirty willing to do the work.

        Report Abuse