About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly: No escaping "the similarities between what Hitler ... did back then and the hate-filled blogs, what they're doing"

February 29, 2008 8:18 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On The O'Reilly Factor, Bill O'Reilly responded to a viewer's letter -- criticizing O'Reilly for a "lapse of judgment" regarding his statement that he did not "see any difference between [Huffington Post founder Arianna] Huffington and the Nazis" -- by defending the statement. O'Reilly said: "If you look back at what happened in Germany, you cannot escape the similarities between what Hitler and his cutthroats did back then and the hate-filled blogs, what they're doing now."

46 Comments

During the February 28 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly responded to a viewer's letter -- criticizing O'Reilly for a "lapse of judgment" regarding his statement that he did not "see any difference between [Huffington Post founder Arianna] Huffington and the Nazis" -- by defending the statement. O'Reilly read the letter from viewer Israel Gopstein, who wrote: "Mr. O'Reilly, I'm surprised at your lapse of judgment comparing the tactics of the Nazis to The Huffington Post. I lost many members of my family to the Holocaust, and the meaning of their deaths means more than a comparison to a meaningless blog." O'Reilly then said: "Now, first of all, I appreciate your letter very much, sir, and I've thought about it. If you look back at what happened in Germany, you cannot escape the similarities between what Hitler and his cutthroats did back then and the hate-filled blogs, what they're doing now."

O'Reilly continued: "From the late 1920s to 1933, when Hitler became chancellor, the Nazis used vile propaganda to demonize Jews and others in the eyes of the German people. They used newspapers, radio, leaflets, and rallies to build up enormous hatred towards your family." He added: "Today, we are seeing the same thing on the Net here in America. There's no difference. When Arianna Huffington allows people to say that Nancy Reagan should suffer terribly and then die, that is completely unacceptable and no different than what Dr. Joseph Goebbels and others were putting out way back then."

During the February 27 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly attacked Huffington over comments (since removed) that readers posted to an item on the website reporting the hospitalization of former first lady Nancy Reagan after a fall. O'Reilly asserted: "[Y]ou know, I'm not going to call her a name. Arianna Huffington, I have no respect for the woman. I think that she is hurting the country. I wish everybody felt the way I did." Townhall.com managing editor Mary Katherine Ham, a guest on the show, then stated: "[T]his happens frequently, unfortunately, on the left-wing blogs," adding, "[E]very time a conservative gets injured, dies, has something threatening them -- whether it's [former White House press secretary] Tony Snow with cancer or Mrs. Reagan falling down -- there is often on [the website] Democratic Underground or Huffington Post, a celebration thread." O'Reilly then called The Huffington Post a "sewer" and later asked: "[W]hat's the difference between the Ku Klux Klan and Arianna Huffington? What's the difference?" When Ham replied: "I think there's difference," O'Reilly said: "I don't see any difference between Huffington and the Nazis. ... I don't see any difference." Ham responded: "[O]h, my gosh. I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one." O'Reilly replied: "They both want people to die, Mary Katherine. Don't they?" Ham noted that Huffington "was not the one making those comments" and later stated: "I still don't think she's a Nazi." O'Reilly then said: "I didn't say she was a Nazi. ... I said there's no difference between what the two do. I want everybody to know that."

O'Reilly frequently attacks those with whom he disagrees, comparing them to the Nazis or the Ku Klux Klan. During the July 17, 2007, edition of The O'Reilly Factor, for example, O'Reilly claimed that the blog Daily Kos is a "hate website[]" and opined: "There's no difference between the KKK and the Nazis, who have websites, than the Daily Kos."

TVNewser.com and Portfolio.com blogger Jeff Bercovici also documented O'Reilly's February 28 comments defending his previous statement about Huffington and the Nazis.

From the February 28 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: Now, the letters.

Israel Gopstein, Silver Spring, Maryland: "Mr. O'Reilly, I'm surprised at your lapse of judgment comparing the tactics of the Nazis to The Huffington Post. I lost many members of my family to the Holocaust, and the meaning of their deaths means more than a comparison to a meaningless blog."

Now, first of all, I appreciate your letter very much, sir, and I've thought about it. If you look back at what happened in Germany, you cannot escape the similarities between what Hitler and his cutthroats did back then and the hate-filled blogs, what they're doing now.

From the late 1920s to 1933, when Hitler became chancellor, the Nazis used vile propaganda to demonize Jews and others in the eyes of the German people. They used newspapers, radio, leaflets, and rallies to build up enormous hatred towards your family.

Today, we are seeing the same thing on the Net here in America. There's no difference. When Arianna Huffington allows people to say that Nancy Reagan should suffer terribly and then die, that is completely unacceptable and no different than what Dr. Joseph Goebbels and others were putting out way back then.

Again, I thank you for your thoughtful letter.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by noconspiracy (February 29, 2008 8:37 pm ET)
         

      "From the late 1920s to 1933..."

       You do realize, don't you, that Hitler didn't LEAVE power in 1933; he TOOK power in 1933. It makes a big difference, what with all the war and genocide you're leaving out of your comparison.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by werner (February 29, 2008 8:43 pm ET)
         

      O'Reilly must be reading Jonah Goldberg or in some way be influenced by him.

      The Amazon site for Goldberg has lots of "wing nuts" praising him in their reviews.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by noconspiracy (February 29, 2008 8:44 pm ET)
           
        No kidding. They really do march in lockstep, don't they?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by carlileb5935 (February 29, 2008 9:38 pm ET)
             
          Ya! Heil! Heil!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by greatjob (March 01, 2008 4:30 am ET)
               
            Oh my God... It's so amazing how you people didn't even read the book and don't even realize how you are the archetype of sheep that he profiles in it. It's deftly argued and well-researched; at least engage its arguments honestly if you're going to at all.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by funnymanpants (March 01, 2008 11:11 am ET)
                 

              Goldberg's book is a joke. Here's what the *neo-conservative* Michael Leeden said about it:

              "The issue is 'the same goals,' not just the methods of rule, and here’s where Jonah’s eccentric thesis, for all its provocative value, leaves history behind and strides into…vision, I suppose. Just a few lines later, he claims that 'Woodrow Wilson was the twentieth century’s first fascist dictator,' and that’s just silly. I am second to no one in my antipathy for Wilson—I once wrote a book that lambasted him for his stupid politics after the War—but he wasn’t a single-party dictator, which fascism always was.

              ... 


              "The best that can be said about this is that it’s imaginative."

              link 

              Report Abuse
            • Author by loonz (March 01, 2008 5:47 pm ET)
                 

              Oh my God... It's so amazing how you people didn't even read the book

              Would you read a book titled "Conservative Communist" or would you dismiss it?

              Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (March 02, 2008 3:02 am ET)
                 
              Oh my God its amazing how brainwashed you are and how your total inability to thing for yourself is trumpted in every post you make. If you ever had an original thought it would die in the long empty trek from one side of your empty head to the other.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by greatjob (March 03, 2008 4:41 pm ET)
                   
                That's funny coming from the person who uses the same talking point in every post he makes. I'm stupid and don't think for myself, just like all Republicans. I get it. You're always a breath of fresh air and originality, you doddering old hypocrite.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 02, 2008 1:50 pm ET)
                 

              Greatjob, I'll admit to not having read Goldberg's book. I have caught several interviews with him on tv and radio,none with overly aggressive interviewers, and the man is unable to even explain the basic premise of his book without glaring inconsistencies and contradictions.

              The inability to defend his "ideas" even for the duration of a short conversation, doesn't really sell most people the book.Glad to hear you enjoyed it. Were you high?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by greatjob (March 03, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
                   
                How's that old adage go? Something about books and covers? Nevertheless, I was under the impression that liberals were the people who were into marijuana.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (February 29, 2008 8:49 pm ET)
         

      except what they "did back then" was listen to a popular anti roosevelt priest on the radio called father charles coughlin, who was avidly anti-semitic.

      http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B02EEDB1139F933A25754C0A960958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all

      Report Abuse
    • Author by werner (February 29, 2008 8:49 pm ET)
         

      Yeah they really do. If you write a negative review of the book they will accuse you of not reading the book and attempt to get your review deleted by Amazon as the rules are you can't write a review of a book you haven't read.

      Also there is someone there debating on the comments page who sounds suspiciously like Goldberg himself. 

      Jonah certainly took a page from Coulter, you can get wealthy by saying outrageous things.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (February 29, 2008 8:52 pm ET)
         

      O'Really? gets more unhinged every day.  And now routinely projects his own traits onto others.

      I find it hard to believe that anyone can take him seriously.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (February 29, 2008 9:25 pm ET)
         

      "goebbles global news" = 5 syllables

      "Murdoch's news channel" = 5 syllables

      Coincidence? Don't think so...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (March 01, 2008 1:12 pm ET)
           

        SNOOPY,

        That is the kind of linking (or is it thinking?) that might get FOX Noise to offer you a job!

        :)

        *No Snoopy, I don't equate you to a lowly right-wing tool like Jonah or BillO.... I know where you stand as far as your posts are concerned. I know you don't believe it yourself. I'm simply stating that your link is the kind that could make FOX proud*

        Report Abuse
    • Author by lapsedlawyer (February 29, 2008 9:52 pm ET)
         

      ...you cannot escape the similarities between what Hitler and his cutthroats did back then and the hate-filled blogs, what they're doing now.

      Um, unlike what you do, Billy-boy?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by the7sticks3363 (March 01, 2008 12:02 am ET)
         
      Actually, I heard about this first on Townhall.com, or at least, I stumbled onto it. My memory is a little hazy, but the headline of O'Reilly's column mentioned something about, quote "hate-filled" bloggers. It's kind of ironic he would post it on a website that, in itself, has a few "hate-filled" bloggers (I.E. Kevin McCullough, anyone?)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (March 01, 2008 12:17 am ET)
         
      It just makes me tired ...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by harris03112935 (March 01, 2008 12:45 am ET)
         
      After all the hate filled rhetoric this guy has spewed for years,  how can he have the nerve to say this?  I'm just baffled.  The only explanation is that he really is crazy, or so deluded as to be indistinguishable from crazy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 01, 2008 1:07 am ET)
           

        The lack of self-awareness is stunning. A forum that freely allows private ordinary citizens to post anything they want- even comments highly critical of the party in power and the huge corporate media that serves that party, is criticized as being similar to the Nazis.

        The comparison is made by a major spokesman for that mainstream media, a man who has paraded his ignorance and dislrespect of gays , women and non-whites, his hatred of those whose beliefs in secular and religious matters differ from his own, and especially for those who question the government when it starts to forget who it's working for.

        Amazing.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Clevenative (March 01, 2008 7:54 am ET)
             

          I guess BillO misses the one big difference in his analogy – one is the voice of the oppressor and the other is the voice of the oppressed.

          I don’t usually say this about anyone – but I’m happy to add weight to his rant – I HATE Bill O’Reilly. The fact that there are dozens of websites expressing these same feelings – one even named “I Hate Bill O’Reilly”– you can understand his defense. As shallow and transparent as this defense is, it’s all he has – he can’t change the history of his past comments and hate-rants, so all he can do is create more hatred by comparing anyone who exposes him for the scumbag he is, to “evil-doers” of days gone by. It’s not like BillO is the only wingnut to use these defense tactics – they all do – it’s all they’ve got.

          Another big difference in “hate” expressed by liberals and “hate” expressed by the right-wing – our hate is usually directed at the individuals who “make up” and promote hatred to others – where their hate is frequently directed at people who can do little or nothing about their “condition”, they hate people for who they are, not for what they have done.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by big2xrube6146 (March 01, 2008 3:03 pm ET)
               
               A-men to that. You hit the nail right on the head real good with that statement. I'am like you I HATE BILL O. I also hate all conservitive talk show host. What a bunch of IDIOTS.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 01, 2008 5:46 am ET)
           

        I really tghink this guy is on meds. He is getting old fast and for a 60 some guy to appeal to the 25 plus demographic, he has to be as immature as his audience.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 01, 2008 10:41 am ET)
         
      There's no escaping the similarities between the O'Reilly Factor and the training videos released by Al-Qaeda, either.  Except that Bill seems a lot angrier than Bin Laden.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tman418 (March 03, 2008 12:41 am ET)
           
        Well actually, Kyle, O'Reilly is a spokesperson for Al Qaeda. Afterall, he told the world that if we elect Hillary Clinton, he says that they will say, "Oh good, we like this," and then they'll attack us.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by lib'ral (March 01, 2008 11:33 am ET)
         

      The Freepers alone account for more disgusting hatred than all the left-wing blogs combined. I remember a few years ago there was a rather misguided girl who went to help Palestinian refigees, got sucked into some radical action and ended up killed by an Israeli tank. You should have seen the celebrating on Free Republic - all kinds of PhotoShopped images and nasty commentary.

      O'Reilly also conveniently forgets that the Nazi propaganda was GOVERNMENT-sponsored, not privately engaged.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dangrady (March 01, 2008 12:27 pm ET)
         

      SAVE DEMOCRACY, VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!

      Here is some smoke for your pipe there Billo! Nancy Reagan was the snotty fool that condescended upon millions of men and women to tell the world "Just Say No" to drugs instead of funding any meaningfull drug treatment, and rehabilitation.

      This is a woman that spoke in support of her husbands willfull ignorance of the AIDS epidemic, and made any government involvement including from the CDC almost impossible to pursue fighting the disease that cost thousands of American lives for no better reason than simple homophobia! Years of denial that held up any serious effort to contain the disease.

      Did we ever hear any apology for there failure to act, their willingness to pigeon hole this plague as a Act Of God against homosexuals, as penance! Never mind all the heterosexuals, and people whom died because of blood tranfusions while the Reagan's behaved like Evangelical Fanatics about the disease.

      Happy Thoughts;

      Dan Grady

      Report Abuse
    • Author by cArn (March 01, 2008 12:43 pm ET)
         

      Oh my God... It's so amazing how you people didn't even read the book and don't even realize how you are the archetype of sheep that he profiles in it. It's deftly argued and well-researched; at least engage its arguments honestly if you're going to at all.

      I don't need to eat a piece of dog poo to know it tastes like dog poo.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Goodfella57 (March 01, 2008 2:55 pm ET)
         

      If you really want to see a hate-filled rant from Huffington Post. Check this out about Ann Coulter's memorial to her recently-deceased father. This is NOT from the public comments. It is from Chris Kelly; One of Huff's regular columnists.

      I'm sorry but no main-stream conservative talk show host, commentator or columnist would be as mean-spirited as Mr. Kelly about the death of a  family member.  No one! 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 02, 2008 3:06 am ET)
           
        Hey when you dish out the ignorant hatefilled personal attacks ANN does you lose any credibility to complain others treat YOU the same way.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (March 03, 2008 12:51 pm ET)
           
        Her father's eulogy was just like everything else she writes: irreverent, disrespectful and utter crap.  I have no problem with the columnist's response.  Ann has no talent, and her father's eulogy was embarrassing and awkward at best.  (She tried to write a eulogy and it sounded more like a wedding toast, or a toast at someone's retirement party.)  She deserves all the crticism she gets and more.  She's a vile woman.  (And that's assuming she even IS a woman.)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shevyshavon5837 (March 01, 2008 3:14 pm ET)
         
       Vile propaganda is Vile propaganda. Why would an editor allow horse dung to be posted on the blog?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by werner (March 01, 2008 3:35 pm ET)
         

      Ann Coulter herself has been as mean spirited as Mr Kelly on several occasions. First of all Ann Coulter herself almost advocated blowing up the New York Times building.  If I remember correctly she said after the Timothy McVeigh/Oklahoma City bombing she wished it had been the New York Times that had been bombed. Seondly after 9/11 she insulted a group of the widows of those men killed in 9/11 the so called Jersey Girls because they criticized Bush and the Republicans. Thirdly Coulter herself comes across as rather unfeeling in her comments about her father.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 01, 2008 3:38 pm ET)
           

        Coulter herself comes across as rather unfeeling in her comments about her father.

        Which was the point of Kelly's piece. Goodfella seems to have missed it.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by usappa00 (March 01, 2008 3:36 pm ET)
         
      Hey Bill ever heard of the first amendment.  I'm pretty sure the Nazis didn't have that back then.  Bill O are you saying that Liberals want to or have the capacity to round up all you right wing hate mongers and force you to live in a concentration camp?  Then kill millions of you simply because you are Republicans.  Kill babies, children, women, boys, men.  What exactly is going to happen Bill O if people continueto be able to voice their first amendment right on the Huffington post blog or any other blog out there?  You see Bill O we know how discusting and horrible Hitler and the Nazis were.  Do you?  I would risk my life to stop that from ever happening again.  Would you?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by guy montag (March 01, 2008 4:08 pm ET)
         

      Let's all praise O'Reilly
      He is our go-to-guy
      Although he is quite clueless
      And doesn't really try.

      He tells us in so many ways
      That he is always right
      The rich are quick to start a war
      When it's the poor who fight.

      He claims we lost in Vietnam
      Because we had no guts
      This coming from a creampuff
      Who wouldn't risk his butt.

      It's up to us true patriots
      Against this knave and fool
      Who strives to kill our liberty
      We'll never be his tool!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (March 02, 2008 3:08 am ET)
         
      There is no escaping the similarity between Billy O and a dribbling moron whithout a shred of decency.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jeremyderifield3396 (March 02, 2008 2:54 pm ET)
         

      I love the fake look of over concern in that screencap.  This is beyond the ridiculous.  I've had my life threatened on Gathering of Eagles and Michellemalkin.com.  I saw a post on Michellemalkin recently regarding an African-American convict, who a poster compared to a monkey and tossed out the old standby about sending him (them) back to Africa.  I used to see threats of violence and hatespeech daily by "Iluvfreebeer" on the old Conservative Life forum that has been absorbed by another blog that I never followed the forum to.  He was a very popular poster there and had the highest post count.  On Townhall a few days ago, in response to Mr. Hurt Feeling's article, a poster named 'lilly' reposted vitriolic, hate-filled quotes from commenters there.  Several regulars still didn't understand or accept the sad, sorry irony in all this. And of course, that civil band of debaters over at FreeRepublic.

      After several years of witnessing his petulant, petty, overly offended behavior I guess I can't really consider Bill O'Reilly a man.  He's a male, I suppose.  But he possesses traits so prevalent in 2-5 year olds that the only reason I take him seriously is due to knowledge of his wide audience of ill-informed, illiterate voting viewers. 

      They will never go away but at least there are now weapons to frustrate this dope silly. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ehutc76164 (March 02, 2008 4:53 pm ET)
         
      • what scares me is that this moron has the most popular show on cable. just how many psycho lunatic right wingers are there in this country? i thought ARCHIE BUNKER was dead
      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (March 03, 2008 12:28 am ET)
         

      "you cannot escape the similarities between what Hitler and his cutthroats did back then and the hate-filled blogs, what they're doing now."

      I'm sorry but did I miss it when LW "blogs" began deporting people to concentration camps?

      Or was that Gitmo?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by commonsenseliberal (March 03, 2008 11:54 am ET)
         

      "From the late 1920s to 1933, when Hitler became chancellor, the Nazis used vile propaganda to demonize Jews and others in the eyes of the German people. They used newspapers, radio, leaflets, and rallies to build up enormous hatred towards your family." - Bill O'Reilly

      Sounds to me like what the right-wing in this country is doing to anyone and anything attached to the word "liberal"

      O'Reilly's got it backwards.  It's the right-wing who uses "newspapers, radio, leaflets and rallies to build up enormous hatred...".  Liberals, for the most part, steer clear of using this kind of propaganda.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (March 03, 2008 12:22 pm ET)
         

      Yeah, OK Bill. Whatever you say there big fella...

      Jeesh. Last I knew, Nazis weren't too much about free speech, and were all about taking people down, making them all think alike, you know, fascism and things like that they they were famous for. Letting everyone speak, or in this case, write what was on their mind, not high on the Nazi's list of to do items methinks.

      Last I knew, Huffpo readers and or commenters have not been rounding folks up, and sending them to death camps just because "they're different", or of a different religion.

      Jesus H Christ Bill. Get a grip will ya? Do you ever read the comments on your own site? They're just as bad, if not worse.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jmh (March 03, 2008 4:43 pm ET)
         
      What the O'Reilly's (and Limbaugh's, and Hannity's) of this noise/news generation

      ______always______ fail to point out

      is that it is ____they____ who have been the Vanguard of this era of this

      demonizing, hateful, trash-talking Noise-Fest.

      Sometime it matters which one of the chicken or egg came first.

      I dare Mr. O to own up to it.

      Apparently this country has not tired of the enabling these jerks...

      the only rational response to them is "Get a Job"
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.