About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Limbaugh said Obama "look[ed] like Ayman Zawahiri" in photo, described Michelle Obama comments as "womb-to-womb frontal attack on Hillary Clinton"

March 03, 2008 6:51 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On The O'Reilly Factor, Rush Limbaugh said, referring to a photograph of Sen. Barack Obama dressed in traditional Somali clothing, "I think that Michelle Obama is seething over the attacks that the Clintons have made against her husband with that photo with, you know, Obama looking like [Osama bin Laden's chief collaborator] Ayman [al-]Zawahiri, all of this talk about his middle name and so forth." In fact, Hillary Clinton has denied any knowledge of the photo's release and said, "[T]hat's not the kind of behavior that I condone or expect from the people working in my campaign." Limbaugh added that Mrs. Obama responded "with a womb-to-womb frontal attack on Hillary Clinton."

58 Comments

During the February 29 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, guest host Laura Ingraham interviewed Rush Limbaugh, who said, referring to a photograph of Sen. Barack Obama dressed in traditional Somali clothing that was recently posted on the Drudge Report, that Obama "look[ed] like Ayman [al-]Zawahiri," Osama bin Laden's chief collaborator. Additionally, referring to comments by Michelle Obama at a recent campaign event in Zanesville, Ohio, Limbaugh said: "I think this was Michelle Obama with a womb-to-womb frontal attack on Hillary Clinton, and I think Hillary Clinton's seething. I think she knows this. I know most men probably would not pick this up, but this is juicy. It is -- it is just too good."

Limbaugh asserted: "I think that Michelle Obama is seething over the attacks that the Clintons have made against her husband with that photo with, you know, Obama looking like Ayman [al-]Zawahiri, all of this talk about his middle name and so forth." In fact, during the February 26 Democratic primary debate hosted by MSNBC, Clinton denied any knowledge of the photo's release and said, "[T]hat's not the kind of behavior that I condone or expect from the people working in my campaign." Obama responded that he took "Senator Clinton at her word" and said: "So I think that's something that we can set aside."

Yusuf Garaad Omar, head of the BBC's Somali Service, said of the clothes Obama was wearing in the photograph:

These are the normal clothes that nomadic people wear. The head turban is especially used by elderly people as a suggestion of respect. It is something that has no meaning whatsoever in Somalia culture. If you see someone dressed like that in Somalia, you think it is a nomadic person -- that is all. There is no religious significance to it whatsoever. It is mainly the nomadic people who use it. Some of them are religious, some are not. It is simply a tradition of the place where they are from.

Limbaugh has previously made numerous disparaging and controversial remarks about women.

From the February 29 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

INGRAHAM: Rush, I understand that the Rush Limbaugh audience is mobilizing in Texas for Hillary. Am I hearing that right?

LIMBAUGH: I don't know if the audience is mobilizing or not. I am urging people -- I'm using a phrase, the Republicans -- I mean, our nominee is chosen; it's John McCain. Texas is open. And I want Hillary to stay in this, Laura. This is too good a soap opera. We need Barack Obama bloodied up politically, and it's obvious that the Republicans are not going to do it and don't have the stomach for it.

As you probably know, we're getting all kinds of memos from the RNC, saying, "We're not going to be critical there." Mark McKinnon of McCain's campaign says he'll quit if they get critical of Obama. This is the presidency of the United States we're talking about. I want our party to win. I want the Democrats to lose. They're in the midst of tearing themselves apart right now. It is fascinating to watch. And it's all going to stop if Hillary loses.

So, yeah, I'm asking people to cross over and -- if they can stomach it. I know it's a difficult thing to do, to vote for a Clinton. But it will sustain this soap opera, and it's something I think we need. And it'd be fun, too.

INGRAHAM: I mean, Rush, Bill, and Hillary -- very strange bedfellows. I mean, I've never heard of anything like that, but anything to keep the chaos going.

LIMBAUGH: Well, let me tell you what the chaos is. Let me give you a great example. We had Michelle Obama, who was in Zanesville, Ohio, talking to a bunch of people that live there. The income, average income, is below the national average. So is the education level. And Michelle Obama is telling them, don't go into corporate America. Don't be -- she specified two things: Don't become a corporate lawyer and don't become a hedge-fund operator.

Now, Hillary was a corporate lawyer, and Chelsea is in the hedge-fund business. I think that Michelle Obama is seething over the attacks that the Clintons have made against her husband with that photo with, you know, the -- Obama looking like Ayman [al-]Zawahiri, all of this talk about his middle name and so forth.

I think this was Michelle Obama with a womb-to-womb frontal attack on Hillary Clinton, and I think Hillary Clinton's seething. I think she knows this. I know most men probably would not pick this up, but this is juicy. It is -- it is just too good.

The whole point of Michelle Obama's riff was not to talk to that audience in Zanesville. It was -- is to appeal to Hillary Clinton.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by snoopy (March 03, 2008 6:57 pm ET)
         

      Who keeps bringing up the picture and the middle name again? Oh, that's right. The reich wing talking heads.

      1st I ever heard about the OBL 2nd in command comparison, BTW. Another reich wing reach that they then try to blame on the left. Classy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (March 03, 2008 7:00 pm ET)
         

      Limbaugh: "We need Barack Obama bloodied up politically"...

      because republicans can't win on the issues.

      Except racism isn't politics, it's racism, people!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (March 03, 2008 9:42 pm ET)
           

        SNOOPY.....

        Like the old Republican adage.... "It's the economy stupid!"

        Now "It's the race of the candidate stupid!"

        These slimy bastards will not stop until they have drowned their own party into oblivion.... somehow.... I get the feeling they won't be that missed?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by BillJ-MN (March 03, 2008 9:49 pm ET)
             
          Without looking it up, I'm pretty sure "It's the economy, stupid" was the mantra of Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by TomJoad (March 03, 2008 7:25 pm ET)
         
      He DOES look like Ayman [al-]Zawahiri! They both have slightly browner skin than your average bear! What more evidence do you people need that Obama is an islamo-fascist? Are you blind?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (March 03, 2008 7:27 pm ET)
           

        goebbles' global news = 5 syllables

        murdochs' news network = 5 syllables

        coincidence? ;)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by TomJoad (March 03, 2008 7:36 pm ET)
             
          I think not, snoopy. I think not.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by unhipcat (March 04, 2008 5:48 pm ET)
               

            But, John Sidney McCain III. The Third. The similarity of his name to the Third Reich is no less than Obama's name is to that of a former Iraqi dictator.

            You really have something loose to make any connection between a name his parents gave him 46 years and some purported membership in a worldwide terrorist movement. Really. I mean it. That train of thought borders on lunacy or idiocy.

            And don't think that people's responses to your comments here gives them any sort of legitimacy. Mostly, we just feel sorry for you and are glad that we don't know you personally. So, please, get back to Rush and Savage and leave the sharp objects alone.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (March 03, 2008 7:30 pm ET)
         

       And Michelle Obama is telling them, don't go into corporate America. Don't be -- she specified two things: Don't become a corporate lawyer and don't become a hedge-fund operator.

      Rush may have a point in thinking this was aimed at Hillary. Petty backhand attack IF it was.

      Also don't ya just love when wealthy folks tell us not to try to be wealthy too? .

      Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 03, 2008 7:35 pm ET)
           

        Hi Jeter,

        What I understood Mrs. Obama to mean was that these people shouldn't tie their self-worth to their financial situation.  I think encouraging people to be nurses or teachers is great!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (March 03, 2008 9:52 pm ET)
             

          Hey Fried,

          I've read what Michele Obama had to say to the group of young woman at a day care center & I don't see where suggesting they not pursue lucrative careers has anything to do with "self-worth". It seemed to me she was suggesting they go into what she referred to as "helping careers" as some sort of *good doobie decision [* a Romper Room reference for those not old enough to remember]

          Now I've got nothing against encouraging young people to become teachers, nurses, firefighters, policemen etc if that's their calling...but coming from Michele Obama, a former corporate lawyer who is wealthy & has no cares about paying the bills to me is just more of that Liberal, do as I say, not as I do malarkey. IMO.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 03, 2008 10:56 pm ET)
               

            Hi Jeter,

            I started out as a teacher and later became a lawyer and I guess I am going to just have to agree to disagree here.  I don't there is anything wrong with pumping them up and telling them how valued they are because of the paths they have chosen.  I can see where you are coming from though.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2008 9:11 am ET)
                 

              Hey Fried,

              We may disagree about Michelle Obama's motives, but just to let you know, my wife & eldest son are both social studies teachers so I have the utmost respect for those that go into that profession. Actually I would respect all those that do, even if I didn't have family members in that line of work. 

              Michele Obama, a successful lawyer telling folks not to go for a lucrative career like she did is to me a little like Keith Richards lecturing kids to not do drugs. Well ok, maybe that's a bad example ;-)

              But you get my point, I hope :-)

              Report Abuse
              • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 04, 2008 9:56 am ET)
                   

                I do get your point, Jeter.  My dad, who also is an attorney, encouraged me to choose a profession that gave back to the community and placed almost no emphasis on $$. 

                I don't think she was discouraging anyone; rather she was telling them to be proud of their chosen paths.

                If you really want a good analogy for your point, I think Bush gave you one:

                Bush on Nation Building:

                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfv4nC3xyr0

                Report Abuse
          • Author by Chromium (March 03, 2008 11:07 pm ET)
               

            Jeter:

            You made quite a spelling error:

            Do Bee:  What Romper Room fans should be

            Don't Bee:  What Romper Room fans should not be

            Doobie:  Mary Jane's cigarettes...

             

            Peace,

            MoSho 

             

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by wzwriter (March 04, 2008 7:50 am ET)
                 

              Do Bee:  What Romper Room fans should be

              Don't Bee:  What Romper Room fans should not be

              Doobie:  Mary Jane's cigarettes...

              Doobie Doobie Doo:  What Frank Sinatra sang when he forgot the words to "Strangers In The Night".  :-)

              Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2008 9:13 am ET)
                 

              You made quite a spelling error:

              Do Bee:  What Romper Room fans should be

              Don't Bee:  What Romper Room fans should not be

              Yikes you're right!!

              Guess that makes me a Don't Be ;-)

              Doobie:  Mary Jane's cigarettes...

              Maybe a drug flashback & childhood memory got intertwined here? :-O

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Chromium (March 04, 2008 10:37 am ET)
                   

                This may be just an Urban Legend, but supposedly one of the Romper Room suggestions was:

                 

                Do Bee:  a sidewalk walker.

                 

                Don't Bee:  a streetwalker

                 

                (Did little Johnny tattle that his sister was a streetwalker?) 

                Report Abuse
          • Author by roundhouse (March 04, 2008 11:05 am ET)
               
            "Now I've got nothing against encouraging young people to become teachers, nurses, firefighters, policemen etc if that's their calling"

            I would bet you have more of a problem than you might realize. She's putting out the call for dedicated public servants. Now given the ridiculous conservative stance on taxes and government, the very idea of good government is anathema. Public service is what good government is all about.

            On the other hand, if you have strong beliefs that teachers, fire fighters and police are essential to a strong country, you might just be a liberal. And you have a home with Democrats.

            The Republican party has betrayed your trust, Jeter. They have endeavored for decades to undermine the elemental concepts of our democracy. They have taken public institutions from our hands and placed them in the hands of a few economic royalists. They've done so by strategically pushing privatization schemes. No Child Left Behind is a perfect example. It has nothing to with educating our children and everything to do with ensuring the failure of public education so they can more easily make the argument for school vouchers.

            Abandon the GOP, jeter. They abandoned you long ago.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (March 03, 2008 7:35 pm ET)
           

        They can't destroy the middle class if we'ze moovin' on up, right?

        That darn outside voice again!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by ufleirx (March 03, 2008 8:28 pm ET)
           

        Why does the GOP hate the rich?

        Thanks, Jeter, there is a lob I never thought I'd get a chance to return. I appreciate the set up.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (March 03, 2008 9:54 pm ET)
             

          Huh? Am I missing your point here?

          The GOP hate the rich? Hardly. They'd like others to stop whining about the rich, & try to get rich themselves.

          I guess I reached your lob & returned an overhead smash ;-)

          Report Abuse
          • Author by roundhouse (March 04, 2008 11:13 am ET)
               
            Another example of how the GOP has betrayed you.

            The founders of the conservative movement, Goldwater and Viguery and Reagan, rejected consumerism and materialism. Today, the main appeal of conservatism is the accumulation of material wealth through the reduction of taxes and repeal of corporate regulations.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Clevenative (March 03, 2008 7:31 pm ET)
         

      Limbaugh: “…I know most men probably would not pick this up, but this is juicy. It is -- it is just too good."

      Rush finally admits – he is not a man. Maybe he can fill in for Elisabeth Hasselbeck on The View since he’s so in touch with feminine feelings.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (March 04, 2008 8:25 am ET)
           

        Limbaugh: “…I know most men probably would not pick this up, but this is juicy. It is -- it is just too good."

        Rush finally admits – he is not a man.

        I'd much rather see him finally admit the details of the night he was arrested in the company of that male prostitute in Pittsburgh in the Early '70s, when he was working under the pseudonym "Jeff Christie".

        Report Abuse
    • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 03, 2008 7:33 pm ET)
         

      Memo to Rush, Cunningham, all those who say that the Right is afraid to get "critical" of Obama:

      Note:  being critical of a candidate's policies is perfectly legitimate (to those trolls who say "What policies?" check Obama's website).  What McKinnon is saying (at least my guess anyway) is that if this becomes the politics of race or religion, he's out. 

      Rush, if you need to, read Obama's website.  Get critical.  Face the issues.  Talk policy for a change instead of just attacking.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (March 03, 2008 8:12 pm ET)
           
        Never happen FRIEDBERBOY - 3 words  - The truth hurts.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 04, 2008 10:01 am ET)
             

          I know, Cleve, I know.  One can dream though, right?  Are you doing ok these days?

           

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Clevenative (March 04, 2008 12:10 pm ET)
               

            Yep, Friederboy,  I have the same dreams.

            I’m ok? Thank you for asking!:) 

            Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (March 03, 2008 8:05 pm ET)
         

      Yup them democrats are just a rippin themselves to pieces.

      The evidence for this is? I suppose its just too early to make up those details just right now.

      I expect either candidate has people so emotionally attached that their eventual loss will hit them hard. Hard enough to sit it out? Hard enough to vote for John McBoingBoing?

      I find myself in rare agreement with RushCo. Right now I'd like to see the Democratic candidate selected as late as possible. The "chaos" is to democratic benifit. The noise machine can't really get a groove going till there are only two. Parts of it will be working to cross purposes. Barack will get some experience, which will help him if he's the one to become the singular target. The experience may alter Hillary's campaign in good ways.

      On the sexual identity front. Per Bryan Sykes in,"Saxons,Vikings,and Celts". In the genetic investigation the mytochondria DNA and the Y chromosome are used to track populations. Study of the Y chromosome's functioning discovered that it only has 27 functional chromosomes. Only one activated six weeks after conception causes the embryo to become a male. His opinion,"Men truly are genetically modified women." Also the mitochondria, which produces the chemicals that all cells use to do work are all inherited from your mother.

      I'll never hear anyone use the term male strength quite the same way anymore. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 04, 2008 8:10 am ET)
           
        Eweston, you find yourself in rare agreement with Rush? On what day? In my observation Rush temds to take any event or snapshot in time and project it in a universal scope which usually turns out to be wrong. Perhaps you are just buying into one of Rush's episodes of hype. But just wait because in a few days he will probably be saying something entirely different, having conveniently forgotten what he previously said...or denying he said it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by eweston8542983 (March 04, 2008 9:41 am ET)
             
          It's only a minor agreement Irony. The agreement comes from oposite sides of politics. He wants a long campaign because he feels it will cause hard feelings among democratic voters. I want a long campaign because of the lack of focus this will cause in the media, and telling states who haven't had a primary yet that your primary doesn't count because its already over, is bogus.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (March 04, 2008 9:51 am ET)
               

            Heard on little segment of Hannity yesterday--strictly in error-- a caller who identified himself a Democratic thanked Hannity for his "Stop Hillary Express" and helping Obama get going. Hannity naturally took offense,WAH WAH, and said don't worry, "We will start the derail Obama Express as soon as the decision is made". This goes right along with the program that Hannity must follow to keep his status amongst the ConRight.

            Then Seany said that Ann Coulter would be on his show. A ratings buster.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (March 04, 2008 9:55 am ET)
               
            I got it...no offense intended. My comments were directed more towards Limbaugh. If, hypothetically, Obama trounced Hillary so badly today that she withdrew from the race, next week Limbaugh will be telling everyone how great it is that now the Repubs can focus their attack on Obama. Limbaugh operates every day as though yesterday never happened. 
            Report Abuse
      • Author by AussieBob (March 04, 2008 8:31 am ET)
           

        And to think I left Rush's facebook fan club with the words "Ann Coulter and Bill O'Reilly are my new gods." This diatribe is easily up there with O'Reilly in the perverse hilarity stakes.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ufleirx (March 03, 2008 8:55 pm ET)
         

      Limbaugh -- "the gapping black abyss of crap".

      There is not enough mouthwash in the world to make Rush's halitosis bearble if the world is just.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 04, 2008 12:00 am ET)
           

        INGRAHAM: ... but anything to keep the chaos going.

        LIMBAUGH: Well, let me tell you what the chaos is.

        That chaos is a political party that is, at least in a relative sense, alive. I know, a bit shocking after you've been staring at that GOP corpse for a while.Like a barnacle-fancier looking at a beehive.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 04, 2008 8:43 am ET)
         
      How desperate and chaotic is the Republican Party that it has to encourage Republicans to vote in Democratic primaries in order to attempt to manipulate the selection of the Democratic candidate? It seems to me that if the Democratic Party was in such chaos then all the Republicans would have to do is sit back and allow it to self-destruct. The truth of the matter is that the Democratic Party, for the first time in many years, has two candidates who not only tower over the Republican field but who have generated overwhelming enthusiasm among Democrats. On the other hand, how enthusiastic are Republicans about John McCain? The Republican Party is auch a train wreck that now they're even resorting to voting in Democratic primaries in a desperate attempt to influence whom they will run against. Doesn't sound to me like they're operating from a position of strength.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (March 04, 2008 9:56 am ET)
           
        I hear Ingraham every now and then and the Cons talk about Hillarys' voice. This woman should write, not talk.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dbeden4153 (March 04, 2008 11:02 am ET)
         

      I have to ask, is the world coming to an end??

      I mean, Limbaugh on the Factor is the perfect storm of stupidity.  

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (March 04, 2008 11:27 am ET)
         

      "Obama looking like Ayman [al-]Zawahiri"

      Coming from a man who looks like Jabba the Hut. 

      "We need Barack Obama bloodied up politically"

      POLITICALLY???  That would be a welcome change. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (March 04, 2008 12:59 pm ET)
         
      Of course Rush wants Hillary to win the nomination.  If it wasn't for the Clinton's, he'd be spinning oldies on some third-rate radio station.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jackball (March 04, 2008 2:45 pm ET)
         
      Well I know its fashionable to bash Rush whenever possible, however, in this particular case I think many folks miss the point. The Obama photo in question, which as I understand was circulated by Clinton's camp, obviously was intended to make the Senator look like a terrorist or at least a "scary muslim".

      Isn't the real villain here Hillary's camp and their techniques?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 05, 2008 4:27 am ET)
           
        Got any evidence it was circulated by the Clinton camp? They have denied it. Rightwing circles seem to take it as a matter of dogma but just because Rush or Drudge SAID it came from the Clinton camp doesnt mean it did. So cough up some evidence Clinton circulated that photo or you have no point. As for Rush he is a shameless propagandist and a liar. What more reason do we need to bash him?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jackball (March 05, 2008 12:52 pm ET)
             
          Actually, the Clinton camp never officially denied circulating the photo. Some high-uppers only said they didn't sanction it or know about it. I trust the media (slightly) more then I trust the spin-doctors from any campaign. Personally, I don't get why MMFA is worried about Limbaugh's comments on the photo rather than the actual circulation of the photo, which most likely did come from Clinton's camp. Doesn't make sense, but so far from what I've seen MMFA is not exactly consistent.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (March 05, 2008 2:02 pm ET)
               

            First. Ok so then you DONT have any evidence it came from the Clinton campaign you just WANT to believe it did. Yes they denied it.

            http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/812719,CST-NWS-sweet26.article

            Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said it was "outrageous" to finger the Clinton campaign for circulating the photo and said as far as he knew, they had nothing to do with it.

            http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/15955187.html

            Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson says the campaign didn't sanction it and he doesn't know anything about it.

            Second yes they ARE consistant you guys just have limited comprehension abilities. This is NOT a website about political dynamics but about the conservative media. Its not their purview to talk about whether or not the Clinton campaign did this or that but things like whether or not they are claiming WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE, kinda like YOU, that the Clinton campaign linked this photo. Limbaugh is a propagandist and an admitted liar. What he says is EXACTLY what this site is about. Not what the candidates are doing.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jackball (March 05, 2008 3:00 pm ET)
                 
              I am slightly curious to know what you meant by "you guys"? Surely you aren't making sweeping generalizations about me.

              Regardless, the whole issue here with whatever silly comment Limbaugh said in passing was nothing compared to the actual circulation of the photo itself. Sounds like you don't agree but clearly without a photo, there wouldn't be any Limbaugh comments. MMFA is not taken that seriously by fair minded people precisely because of this type of inconsistency. If MMFA was a serious organization, it would be more interested in lambasting those responsible for the circulation of this photo rather than obvious right wing comment about how Obama looked like a terrorist. I mean that was the whole point of the photo. Rush just was stating the obvious. MMFA should be crying foul against the circulators, who most likely are the Clinton camp. Drudge says it was the Clintons and the Clinton's don't deny it.. they just say they weren't aware of it. Big difference. With regards to your comment on who is a proven liar, you should be careful with that one given that we are talking about the Clintons here.

              Cheers.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (March 05, 2008 7:02 pm ET)
                   

                By you guys I mean the stupid people who cant get it through their thick heads and past their protruding brow ridge that this is NOT A SITE ABOUT POLITICS and make IGNORANT statements like this is why MMFA is not taken seriously by fair minded people. You know, MORONS. Go read the mission statement. This site is NOT covering the campaign and how each side acts but how the conservative media covers it. I cant really make it any simpler. Find someone with a normal IQ to explain it to you then get back to us. YES they DID deny it. What part of as far as I know WE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT are you having a problem understanding? Now they cant speak for every person who supports Hillary THUS the as far as I know but the SPOKESPERSON for the campaign also denied it as my link showed. You can keep repeating this over and over as if it will magically become true if you do but you have no evidence and Drudge has no credibility. Ya got nothin. When you get some evidence we will be interested until then WISHING WONT MAKE IT SO.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by jackball (March 05, 2008 7:59 pm ET)
                     
                  There's really no need to be rude. It only makes your argument appear weaker. I forgive you though.

                  If you want to pretend that the Clinton camp did deny circulating the Obama photo, go right ahead. What I heard was a clever Clintonesque answer claiming that they didn't sanction the release of the photo and that those questioned about it said they personally knew nothing about it. That may be true but that's also not a denial. You know that though. We all know how the Clintons have problems with telling the truth anyway so it shouldn't surprise you that I personally believe Drudge over Clinton's camp about who released the photo of Obama.

                  Clinton's tactics regarding Obama have been the subject of a lot of controversy and have been covered by both the left and right leaning media outlets. Besides all the inappropriate racial stuff coming from Bill Clinton, you had some very high profile Clinton supporters suggesting that Obama was a drug dealer.

                  Of course MMFA is not taken very seriously by mainstream folks, and the reason is simply because they don't apply their standards consistently. Case in point, you seem to care more about Rush's comment on how the photo obviously made Obama look like a terrorist rather than focusing your attentions on the slimy people who released the Obama photo in the first place. That makes little sense. As you said, MMFA is only concerned with conservative misinformation, and simply looks the other way when the misinformation regarding progressives or progressive issues comes out of the left itself. That's why MMFA is kind of silly. Anyway, I am not surprised at your knee-jerk protection of the Clinton camp given that MMFA is, afterall, a group which Hillary Clinton claims to have helped start. Again, hard to take seriously. Hope you're enjoying it though.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by solon (March 06, 2008 10:46 am ET)
                       
                    Hey you came in here condescendingly scolding MMFA for not doing what YOU think they should do which is outside their purview. Its about like criticising your plumber for not fixing your car. You are STILL doing it. This is simple its not my fault you dont seem  to be bright enough to get it. This site ONLY covers conservative media in the same way that MRC and AIM ONLY cover liberal media. YOU can keep saying who does and doesnt take this site seriously what I dont take seriously is your amazing mind reading powers. See they dont exist. MMFA DID cover how the conservative media covered Bills comments. This site IS taken seriously. I have seen it referrenced by serious journalists. I dont like Hillary. I hope she goes back to the Senate. Your criticisms of this site are just dumb. It isnt UP to you to demand they cover the Clinton campaign. THAT IS NOT WHAT THEY DO. They dont cover the Obama campaign they do not cover the McCain campaign they cover the MEDIA. Try to keep up. And when YOU stop your silly attacks on this site which I give money to I will stop mine on you. Or you can continue to make YOUR attacks then whine piteously that I attack you but its kinda pathetic.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by solon (March 06, 2008 10:58 am ET)
                       
                    Oh and I forgot. You have NO evidence that photo came from the Clinton campaign. If you beleive Drudge over ANYBODY except Limbuagh that shows YOUR lack of judgement, and YES they did deny it. I dont know how much clearer WE DIDNT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT, could possibly be. The guy who said he had no knowlege of it was the campaign spokesperson. That is the guy who speaks for the campaign. So him saying he had no knowlege of it IS also a denial. Ya got nothin. Drudge barely qualifies as nothing. When you can cough up a credible source saying the Clinton campaign was behind it get back to us. I wouldnt put it past Hillary EXCEPT that it has too much potential for blowback. Whatever your political persuasion you have the wingnut mental block. Repeating something over and over does NOT make it any truer than the first time you asserted it.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jackball (March 06, 2008 1:10 pm ET)
                         
                      I see that you are passionate about this. Look, my disagreement isn't personal by any means. I simply don't understand why MMFA, or at least why you specifically are bothered by Rush making a comment that Obama looked like a terrorist in that photo. It seems like tattle-tailing. Clearly Rush didn't release the photo. He just verbalized what most people who saw that photo were thinking already. He's right too, Obama did look like the terrorists.

                      We do agree on one thing, that I just don't get MMFA and their blatent double standards. I really don't get why you'd want to give them your disposable income, but I'm glad you found a hobby.
                      Report Abuse
    • Author by unitarianpatriot (March 04, 2008 5:10 pm ET)
         

      "I think this was Michelle Obama with a womb-to-womb frontal attack on Hillary Clinton."

      Nice misogyny, Mr. Limbaugh, you pathetic being. If you were a real man, I would suggest that you act like one. But we've come to expect such disgusting behavior from you and your worthless compatriots. If they ever let you have state secrets you'd spill those, too, if it furthered your money-grubbing, lowest-common-denominator career. Instead of ties, you should sell barf bags.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by NewUserName25 (March 04, 2008 5:48 pm ET)
         
      I know this is off-topic, but I HATE it when Rush makes any sort of misogynistic remark (like "womb-to-womb"). Any guy who's that unable to keep a women (Rush has 3 divorces) despite immense wealth needs to realize how little understanding he has of the opposite sex and keep his mouth shut.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 04, 2008 7:06 pm ET)
         
      Flush Limbaugh and Screech Ingraham a match definitly NOT made in heaven.This is so typical of these FAR RIGHT WING BLOWHARDS. They are looking for anything to discredit the Democratic candidates. How anyone with  an ounce of common scense  can listen and believe these clowns is beyond me.        Hurricaneyankee  march 4     6:05 pm                  
      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (March 05, 2008 3:32 pm ET)
         

      "that photo with, you know, the -- Obama looking like Ayman [al-]Zawahiri"

      The stupid thing is the photo (as silly as it makes Obama look) bears ZERO resemblence to al Zawahiri. He just as easily could have said he looked like Ghandi. Rush is desperately reaching deep into his bucket of slime looking for something, anything to throw. Just like his recent comparison of Obama to "Curious George" - followed by his denial of knowing who the character was in the first place.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.