About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Luntz falsely claimed Obama has no foreign policy experience

March 04, 2008 3:35 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On Fox News, Frank Luntz told a focus group regarding Sen. Barack Obama: "But let's face it. He doesn't have foreign policy experience. He hasn't run a government, he hasn't run a business. Doesn't that concern you?" In fact, Obama is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has traveled to numerous countries while senator, and sponsored foreign policy-related bills.

44 Comments

During the 10 p.m. ET hour of the March 2 edition of Fox News' America's Election HQ, Republican pollster Frank Luntz said to the studio audience regarding Sen. Barack Obama: "But let's face it. He doesn't have foreign policy experience. He hasn't run a government, he hasn't run a business. Doesn't that concern you?" Luntz then asked the audience, whom he had earlier described as "30 uncommitted people here, come from all different places, different backgrounds": "How many of you are concerned about that?" The cameras then panned the studio to show people with their hands up.

In fact, Obama has served on the Foreign Relations Committee since his election to the Senate and has visited Eastern Europe and Central Asia, the Middle East, and Africa as a senator. Additionally, Obama has sponsored foreign policy legislation such as the Nuclear Weapons Threat Reduction Act of 2007 to eliminate weapons stockpiles and reduce the threat of weapons of mass destruction -- portions of which were enacted as part of the omnibus appropriations bill for FY 2008 -- and the Democratic Republic of Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2006.

At the beginning of the hour, anchor Bill Hemmer introduced Luntz only as the "pollster-in-chief, Frank Luntz of Luntz, Maslansky Strategic Research." As Media Matters for America has noted, Luntz has worked for the Republican Party and for Republican candidates, including Rudy Giuliani during his 1993 and 1997 mayoral campaigns, as well as his 2000 Senate race, from which Giuliani withdrew.

From the 10 p.m. ET hour of the March 2 edition of Fox News' America's Election HQ:

HEMMER: We have a wonderful and well-informed audience with us tonight, and you at home will watch live as we chart their second-by-second reaction to the speeches, to the ads, what works, what doesn't work. With me tonight is the pollster-in-chief, Frank Luntz of Luntz, Maslansky Strategic Research. Good evening, Frank.

LUNTZ: Hey, it's great to be here.

HEMMER: I'm going to start with the most important part of the entire evening. Who's in our audience?

LUNTZ: We've got 30 uncommitted people here, come from all different places, different backgrounds, and they're all holding a device: an instant-response dial. The higher that they turn their dial, the more favorable the response; and if they turn it down, you're getting a negative reaction. They're going to be determining whether the latest ads, the latest sound bites are working for the candidates or turning people off.

[...]

HEMMER: That was retort number two, rated by our viewers so far in this campaign season. We've talked a lot about the strengths with these candidates' men and women tonight. Now we are going to talk about the weaknesses, and where they can improve.

LUNTZ: It's interesting. In the break, we were talking about the balance, and it seems like there's an awful lot of good Obama stuff here. But that's because he's been such a good communicator.

HEMMER: And out here, too.

LUNTZ: But let's face it. He doesn't have foreign policy experience. He hasn't run a government, he hasn't run a business. Doesn't that concern you? It does. How many of you are concerned about that? OK, so most of you. And yet, Obama --

HEMMER: Every single one. Every hand went up.

LUNTZ: And Obama's got more support.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by snoopy (March 04, 2008 3:41 pm ET)
         
      He has more experience than chimp does.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (March 04, 2008 3:49 pm ET)
           
        My thought, exactly. I feel pretty sure that, when the red phone rings in the White House at 3:00 a.m., the call is automatically forwarded to Dick Cheney's house.

        Wait... what am I thinking? The Red Phone IS at Dick Cheney's house. They wouldn't want Dumbya picking it up by mistake.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2008 4:29 pm ET)
           

        He has more experience than chimp does.

        Gee that's a ringing endorsement ;-)

        Hell Snoop, you & I and just about everyone here could probably handle things better than Bush.

        If that phone rings at 3am, I'll take Hillary over McCain, & both Hillary or McCain over Obama.

        Hell with Hillary you'd also get Bill. I still see that as a plus.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dbeden4153 (March 04, 2008 5:08 pm ET)
             
          Jeter, no offense but you're one strange Republican ;)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 04, 2008 5:18 pm ET)
               
            I think he likes grown women too. Freaky.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2008 5:28 pm ET)
                 
              I also lack a wide stance....
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 04, 2008 6:15 pm ET)
                   

                 

                 

                                                           8'O

                Report Abuse
          • Author by jeter2 (March 04, 2008 5:18 pm ET)
               

            I'm a maverick ;-)

            Actually Dbeden, I'm no longer a registered Republican, I re-registered as "Unenrolled" so I could vote in the Massachusetts primary for Hillary.. But I'm still a moderate Conservative.

            Had the Republicans offered better candidates I probably would have stuck it out.

            The Republican party has disappointed me. But that doesn't mean I'm too thrilled with Democrats either.

            I'd rather not be affiliated with either party.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Clevenative (March 05, 2008 11:51 am ET)
                 
              Who would? LOL - I think for most of mainstream American's it's just a choice between the lesser of two evils.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Lynn (March 05, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
             
          Why? According to Hillary Clinton we should choose the person "with the most experience" and McCain has WAY more experience than Hilary Clinton who only has a few years more experience than Obama. She's only been an elected official for about 8 years. Anyway I have a feeling than McCain's might just win this if everyone follows the Hilary directive. It’s sad for me; the Dems are split and terrically pissed at each other. I'm not sure the DEms are going to be able to pull together and hold the coalition they need. The Democratic turn-out has been tremendous and a lot of that has been fueled by the excitement that Obama has brought to the process. If the Dems lose parts of that excited coalition and those folks stay home, McCain’s going to win by default, and it will be business as usual.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by RINO Hunter (March 05, 2008 4:54 pm ET)
             

          "Hell with Hillary you'd also get Bill. I still see that as a plus"

          Ah yes. It would be great to have the guy back who refused to fight Al-Quaeda after they bombed the basement of the World Trade Center. Clinton simply let Al-Quaeda grow and become stronger. (Not that Bush has been perfect either, but Clinton was just aweful.) And Jeter, I don't have anything against you personally, but why do you still claim to be a conservative? Wouldn't moderately liberal be a better description?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (March 05, 2008 6:24 pm ET)
               
            I see you've been reading "Peabody's improbable History" again. Good luck and get well soon.

            If you want good history, try this from
            Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (March 06, 2008 11:17 am ET)
               
            Why do you lie so much. Clinton froze the Taliban assets, he tried to kill Osama. The people who blew up the WTC are in PRISON RIGHT NOW and will never get out. He tripled the counterterrorism budget. You just spew out this basless nonsense because you are ignorant and only believe what Rush TELLS you to beleive. Reagans counterterrorism Czar gave Clinton high marks on counterterrorism and said his only complaint is he spent TOO much time on Osama. You are the most brainwashed, totally out of touch with reality poster, on this site. Reality makes you break out in a rash. It was BUSH who was deeply comitted to Operation Ignore Terrorism, not Clinton.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (March 04, 2008 3:42 pm ET)
         

      I don't believe George W. Bush had much foreign policy experience and we are now embroiled in that inexperience as a result.  

      So Luntz has little credibility on this one. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (March 04, 2008 3:55 pm ET)
           

        W had zero, absolutely zero foreign policy experience. Not to mention if Luntz's acid test is running a business, how many times did W fail that one as well? There were plenty of those for him. Somehow though, he turned those into something "good". And look at his record in Texas. Lots of things went to crap when he was running the State.

        It still, constantly amazes me that he was "elected" the first time, and then we RE-ELECTED him 4 years later. Dang, we got what we deserved with him...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (March 04, 2008 4:00 pm ET)
           
        Heck, W didn't even have any eperience travelling to a foreign country as a tourist. He thought eating taco's at taco bell was enough to immerse him into the hispanic culture.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by anotheramerican (March 04, 2008 4:06 pm ET)
             
          Ahh by virtue of visiting the White House when his father was President he gained valuable experience so he was ready, day one!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (March 04, 2008 4:12 pm ET)
               
            He was drunk and stoned at the time, so I'm confident any experience he might have garnered never sunk in.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (March 04, 2008 4:12 pm ET)
               
            Then I've got the experience too. I've traveled overseas and once met Richard Nixon.

            Anyone in Ohio or Texas who hasn't voted yet, please consider writing me in.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by anotheramerican (March 04, 2008 4:20 pm ET)
                 

              You met Nixon? Dang. I already voted.

              A quick one stop search shows Bush visited these countries prior to his election as President:

              China, Japan, Mexico, Spain, Britain, Isreal, Ireland, Gambia, Italy, The West Bank, and Egypt. 

              Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (March 04, 2008 4:08 pm ET)
             
          Be fair, guys. Dubya did have experience running businesses...into the ground.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by anotheramerican (March 04, 2008 4:29 pm ET)
               

            Conch,

            Can you supply a list of these businesses?  

            Report Abuse
            • Author by DorisRussell (March 04, 2008 4:32 pm ET)
                 
              Texas Rangers?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by DorisRussell (March 04, 2008 4:33 pm ET)
                 

              Here is more

              • Arbusto, an oil exploration company, lost money, but it got considerable investments (nearly $5 million) because even losing oil investments were useful as tax shelters.
              • Spectrum 7 Energy Corp. bought out Arbusto in 1984 and hired Mr. Bush to run the company's oil interests in Midland, Texas. The oil business collapsed as oil prices plummeted by 1986, and Spectrum 7 Energy was near failure.
              • Harken Energy acquired Mr. Bush's Spectrum 7 Energy shares, and he got Harken shares, a directorship, and a consulting arrangement in return. Harken, under Bush, brought in Saudi real estate tycoon Sheikh Abdullah Bakhsh as a board member and a major investor. Over the next few years, Harken would turn out to have links to: Saudi money, CIA-connected Filipinos, the Harvard Endowment, the emir of Bahrain, and the shadowy Bank of Credit and Commerce International.
                • A 1991 internal SEC document suggested George W. Bush violated federal securities law at least 4 times in the late 1980s and early 1990s in selling Harken stock while serving as a director of Harken. This is essentially the same kind of activity that Martha Stewart is going to prison over. Except at the time of the investigation, Mr. Bush's father was president and the case was quietly dropped.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Conchobhar (March 04, 2008 6:04 pm ET)
                 

              AA: 

              Just checked back.  Doris does a very good job, so I won't waste space.  If you'd like more details, and an extended list of sources, check out Craig Unger's House of Bush, House of Saud.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by watershed (March 04, 2008 3:57 pm ET)
         
      "And how many of you are concerned that a well known partisan hack like Luntz is giving you false information and asking leading questions?"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (March 04, 2008 6:59 pm ET)
           
        Voters duped by Bush twice not just once

        Thru a partisan pollster named Luntz

        For his work he is blamed

        By his words he is framed

        Let's get rid of Bushco and this dunce.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (March 04, 2008 4:05 pm ET)
         
      Luntz is a Right Wing toadie.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 04, 2008 4:12 pm ET)
           
        Problem is, Nerz, is that he is more powerful than ever.  He is never introduced as "Republican pollster" or "Conservative...."  He is introduced to these people as a neutral.  He should be required to tell the truth, but I guess that is too much responsibility for a Fox guy.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (March 04, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
             
          In case you are unaware, Luntz is the guy who helped Newt Gingrich craft the Republican campaign tactics for taking the 104th Congress in 1994 by, among other things, the use of focus group tested buzz words.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 04, 2008 5:47 pm ET)
               

            Irony,

            Thanks for the reminder.  I am well aware of who this joker is.  I pray that these "focus groups" that he runs as an "impartial" pollster do as well!

            Report Abuse
    • Author by yui0ta (March 04, 2008 4:08 pm ET)
         
      "And over here what do you think of this new digital toaster"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sueelldd (March 04, 2008 4:10 pm ET)
         

      Luntz- How much "Foreign Policy Experience" did Bush have? Or Clinton? Or Reagan?  Or JFK? Or Johnson? What a hack.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 04, 2008 4:55 pm ET)
         
      Wheew...thanks for warning us Mr. Luntz. In other words because of Barack Obama's lack of foreign policy experience it is possible that if elected President he may surround himself with lunatic fringe figures with crazy theories about pre-emptive war and world domination and become influenced by them into starting unnecessary protracted wars. And because he's a novice in foreign policy he might be duped by a manipulative Vice President into committing all sorts of unconstitutional acts in the name of national security. Thanks for warning us, Mr. Luntz...we wouldn't want something like that to happen.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (March 04, 2008 5:52 pm ET)
           
        No we would not.

        I saw a bumper sticker today that read

        Cheney/Satan '08.

        That would be the Republican dream ticket.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (March 04, 2008 7:01 pm ET)
             
          Ugh! NO thanks...that ticket already ran in 2000 and '04.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (March 05, 2008 8:26 am ET)
             

          As previously noted, there has been a split between Satan and the Veep. Who do you think keeps Cheney alive, Satan. When asked by the original Fox newsa/k/a The Daily Hell (all the news hot off the presses), Satan said that after leaving Hell, Mr. Cheney was not permitted to return because, and I quote the Devil himself, "If Mr. Cheney returns, I am afraid that he may corrupt the place."

          At least Luntz is trying to gain the same status. If he wants to vote for Senator John W. McBush, it is okay. But will he answer "focus" group questions?

          Report Abuse
    • Author by FNC Liberal (March 04, 2008 9:31 pm ET)
         

      I can't understand why News Corporation likes to waste its money on this so-called pollster Luntz. He's not 100% accurate and the audience is hand-picked as well.

      Don't buy into this racket.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Olawaar (March 05, 2008 5:30 am ET)
         

      I´m a bit torn about this one. Yes it´s a valid point to question luntz if you ask, does obama have ANY experience in foreign relations. Yes he has some experience, but the things MMFA list, isn´t anything special. No way can you call Obama a widley experienced politician in foreign relations. Has he been to Russia, China, Japan or has he met with the leaders of the EU or UK, Austrailia? Yes the middel east and maby central asia are important but eastern europe and a few countrys in Afrika doesent sum up to a lot. I actually think Obamas record is pretty weak and a legitimate question. And didn´t Hillary have some statistic of Obamas record in the foreignrelations comittee. Something about him not fullfilling his responsibilities. The only reply Obama had was, that his been campaining. Correct me if i´m wrong. 

      I´m telling this from an european perspektive. I like him but nobody knows the guy. Especially if you go back six months.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.