Luntz falsely claimed Obama has no foreign policy experience
SUMMARY: On Fox News, Frank Luntz told a focus group regarding Sen. Barack Obama: "But let's face it. He doesn't have foreign policy experience. He hasn't run a government, he hasn't run a business. Doesn't that concern you?" In fact, Obama is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has traveled to numerous countries while senator, and sponsored foreign policy-related bills.
During the 10 p.m. ET hour of the March 2 edition of Fox News' America's Election HQ, Republican pollster Frank Luntz said to the studio audience regarding Sen. Barack Obama: "But let's face it. He doesn't have foreign policy experience. He hasn't run a government, he hasn't run a business. Doesn't that concern you?" Luntz then asked the audience, whom he had earlier described as "30 uncommitted people here, come from all different places, different backgrounds": "How many of you are concerned about that?" The cameras then panned the studio to show people with their hands up.
In fact, Obama has served on the Foreign Relations Committee since his election to the Senate and has visited Eastern Europe and Central Asia, the Middle East, and Africa as a senator. Additionally, Obama has sponsored foreign policy legislation such as the Nuclear Weapons Threat Reduction Act of 2007 to eliminate weapons stockpiles and reduce the threat of weapons of mass destruction -- portions of which were enacted as part of the omnibus appropriations bill for FY 2008 -- and the Democratic Republic of Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Promotion Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2006.
At the beginning of the hour, anchor Bill Hemmer introduced Luntz only as the "pollster-in-chief, Frank Luntz of Luntz, Maslansky Strategic Research." As Media Matters for America has noted, Luntz has worked for the Republican Party and for Republican candidates, including Rudy Giuliani during his 1993 and 1997 mayoral campaigns, as well as his 2000 Senate race, from which Giuliani withdrew.
From the 10 p.m. ET hour of the March 2 edition of Fox News' America's Election HQ:
HEMMER: We have a wonderful and well-informed audience with us tonight, and you at home will watch live as we chart their second-by-second reaction to the speeches, to the ads, what works, what doesn't work. With me tonight is the pollster-in-chief, Frank Luntz of Luntz, Maslansky Strategic Research. Good evening, Frank.
LUNTZ: Hey, it's great to be here.
HEMMER: I'm going to start with the most important part of the entire evening. Who's in our audience?
LUNTZ: We've got 30 uncommitted people here, come from all different places, different backgrounds, and they're all holding a device: an instant-response dial. The higher that they turn their dial, the more favorable the response; and if they turn it down, you're getting a negative reaction. They're going to be determining whether the latest ads, the latest sound bites are working for the candidates or turning people off.
[...]
HEMMER: That was retort number two, rated by our viewers so far in this campaign season. We've talked a lot about the strengths with these candidates' men and women tonight. Now we are going to talk about the weaknesses, and where they can improve.
LUNTZ: It's interesting. In the break, we were talking about the balance, and it seems like there's an awful lot of good Obama stuff here. But that's because he's been such a good communicator.
HEMMER: And out here, too.
LUNTZ: But let's face it. He doesn't have foreign policy experience. He hasn't run a government, he hasn't run a business. Doesn't that concern you? It does. How many of you are concerned about that? OK, so most of you. And yet, Obama --
HEMMER: Every single one. Every hand went up.
LUNTZ: And Obama's got more support.
















Wait... what am I thinking? The Red Phone IS at Dick Cheney's house. They wouldn't want Dumbya picking it up by mistake.
He has more experience than chimp does.
Gee that's a ringing endorsement ;-)
Hell Snoop, you & I and just about everyone here could probably handle things better than Bush.
If that phone rings at 3am, I'll take Hillary over McCain, & both Hillary or McCain over Obama.
Hell with Hillary you'd also get Bill. I still see that as a plus.
8'O
I'm a maverick ;-)
Actually Dbeden, I'm no longer a registered Republican, I re-registered as "Unenrolled" so I could vote in the Massachusetts primary for Hillary.. But I'm still a moderate Conservative.
Had the Republicans offered better candidates I probably would have stuck it out.
The Republican party has disappointed me. But that doesn't mean I'm too thrilled with Democrats either.
I'd rather not be affiliated with either party.
"Hell with Hillary you'd also get Bill. I still see that as a plus"
Ah yes. It would be great to have the guy back who refused to fight Al-Quaeda after they bombed the basement of the World Trade Center. Clinton simply let Al-Quaeda grow and become stronger. (Not that Bush has been perfect either, but Clinton was just aweful.) And Jeter, I don't have anything against you personally, but why do you still claim to be a conservative? Wouldn't moderately liberal be a better description?
If you want good history, try this from
I don't believe George W. Bush had much foreign policy experience and we are now embroiled in that inexperience as a result.
So Luntz has little credibility on this one.
W had zero, absolutely zero foreign policy experience. Not to mention if Luntz's acid test is running a business, how many times did W fail that one as well? There were plenty of those for him. Somehow though, he turned those into something "good". And look at his record in Texas. Lots of things went to crap when he was running the State.
It still, constantly amazes me that he was "elected" the first time, and then we RE-ELECTED him 4 years later. Dang, we got what we deserved with him...
Anyone in Ohio or Texas who hasn't voted yet, please consider writing me in.
You met Nixon? Dang. I already voted.
A quick one stop search shows Bush visited these countries prior to his election as President:
China, Japan, Mexico, Spain, Britain, Isreal, Ireland, Gambia, Italy, The West Bank, and Egypt.
Snoop,
Sorry, I couldn't link.
Conch,
Can you supply a list of these businesses?
Here is more
Nice list, Doris. Any response, AA?
This link has more links about the insider trading allegations:
http://www.buzzflash.com/perspectives/bush_harken.html
This one says that despite no charges, this does not mean he is exonerated:
http://dir.salon.com/story/politics/feature/2002/07/12/harken/index.html
AA:
Just checked back. Doris does a very good job, so I won't waste space. If you'd like more details, and an extended list of sources, check out Craig Unger's House of Bush, House of Saud.
Thru a partisan pollster named Luntz
For his work he is blamed
By his words he is framed
Let's get rid of Bushco and this dunce.
Irony,
Thanks for the reminder. I am well aware of who this joker is. I pray that these "focus groups" that he runs as an "impartial" pollster do as well!
Luntz- How much "Foreign Policy Experience" did Bush have? Or Clinton? Or Reagan? Or JFK? Or Johnson? What a hack.
I saw a bumper sticker today that read
Cheney/Satan '08.
That would be the Republican dream ticket.
As previously noted, there has been a split between Satan and the Veep. Who do you think keeps Cheney alive, Satan. When asked by the original Fox newsa/k/a The Daily Hell (all the news hot off the presses), Satan said that after leaving Hell, Mr. Cheney was not permitted to return because, and I quote the Devil himself, "If Mr. Cheney returns, I am afraid that he may corrupt the place."
At least Luntz is trying to gain the same status. If he wants to vote for Senator John W. McBush, it is okay. But will he answer "focus" group questions?
I can't understand why News Corporation likes to waste its money on this so-called pollster Luntz. He's not 100% accurate and the audience is hand-picked as well.
Don't buy into this racket.
I´m a bit torn about this one. Yes it´s a valid point to question luntz if you ask, does obama have ANY experience in foreign relations. Yes he has some experience, but the things MMFA list, isn´t anything special. No way can you call Obama a widley experienced politician in foreign relations. Has he been to Russia, China, Japan or has he met with the leaders of the EU or UK, Austrailia? Yes the middel east and maby central asia are important but eastern europe and a few countrys in Afrika doesent sum up to a lot. I actually think Obamas record is pretty weak and a legitimate question. And didn´t Hillary have some statistic of Obamas record in the foreignrelations comittee. Something about him not fullfilling his responsibilities. The only reply Obama had was, that his been campaining. Correct me if i´m wrong.
I´m telling this from an european perspektive. I like him but nobody knows the guy. Especially if you go back six months.