About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox hosts Rove without disclosing reported role with McCain campaign

March 11, 2008 2:38 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Republican strategist and Fox News contributor Karl Rove appeared on Fox News' America's Election HQ and Hannity & Colmes to discuss the presidential race, but none of the hosts -- Bill Hemmer, Sean Hannity, or Alan Colmes -- asked Rove whether he was "informally advising" Sen. John McCain's campaign, as a Politico article citing "[a] top McCain adviser" reported, and none noted that Rove has reportedly confirmed donating to McCain's campaign.

67 Comments

Appearing on the March 10 editions of Fox News' America's Election HQ and Hannity & Colmes, Republican strategist and Fox News contributor Karl Rove discussed the Democratic and Republican presidential campaigns, but neither America's Election HQ host Bill Hemmer nor Hannity & Colmes co-hosts Sean Hannity or Alan Colmes asked Rove whether he was "informally advising the campaign" of Sen. John McCain, as a March 8 Politico article reported, citing "[a] top McCain adviser." Further, neither Hemmer nor Hannity or Colmes pointed out that Rove has reportedly confirmed making a financial contribution to McCain's campaign. On America's Election HQ, Hemmer introduced Rove as "Fox News contributor and former White House chief strategist Karl Rove." On Hannity & Colmes, Hannity introduced him by saying, "Fox News contributor -- we call him 'the Architect' -- Karl Rove is back."

From the Politico article, headlined "Mehlman, Rove boost McCain campaign":

John McCain is getting much more than President Bush's endorsement and fundraising help for his campaign. He's getting Bush's staff.

It's no secret that Steve Schmidt, Bush's attack dog in the 2004 election, and Mark McKinnon, the president's media strategist, are performing similar functions for McCain now.

But other big-name Bushies are lining up to boost McCain, too.

Ken Mehlman, who ran Bush's 2004 campaign, is now serving as an unpaid, outside adviser to the Arizona Republican. Karl Rove, the president's top political hand since his Texas days, recently gave money to McCain and soon after had a private conversation with the senator. A top McCain adviser said both Mehlman and Rove are now informally advising the campaign. Rove refused to detail his conversation with McCain.

The list could grow longer. Dan Bartlett, formerly a top aide in the Bush White House, and Sara Taylor, the erstwhile Bush political adviser, said they are eager to provide any assistance and advice possible to McCain.

Rove explained that he and McCain "got to know each other during the 2004 campaign." In a separate interview, Mehlman noted that "McCain was completely loyal to the president in 2004 and worked incredibly hard to help him get elected." According to Taylor, "The Bush Republicans here in town are excited for John McCain."

Despite the president's low approval ratings, there are clear benefits to McCain for this cozy relationship with the Bush team. They are seasoned operatives with a track record of winning back-to-back national elections in tough political environments. But there are obvious drawbacks. First and foremost, any association with the Bush administration helps Democrats make their case that McCain represents a clear extension of an unpopular presidency.

In addition to serving as a Fox News contributor, Rove was named a contributor to Newsweek in November, "offering occasional opinion pieces to the pages of the magazine and to Newsweek.com." Rove's most recent column appeared in the February 11 issue of Newsweek.

From the March 10 edition of Fox News' America's Election HQ:

HEMMER: Fox News contributor and former White House chief strategist Karl Rove is here now. Good evening, Karl. Good to have you back here from America's --

ROVE: How are you?

HEMMER: I'm doing just fine.

[...]

HEMMER: John McCain's been under the radar. And I know that you have said publicly over the past two weeks that that is not necessarily a good thing for him. I'm watching all the --

ROVE: Yeah, not automatically.

HEMMER: -- Sunday talk shows, though, Karl. But I'm hearing a lot of people beat up on Barack Obama and a lot of people beat up on Hillary Clinton, and no one's talking about John McCain. Is that necessarily a bad thing?

ROVE: Look, it is not a bad thing for him to have some time off the trail. No doubt about that. That's good in many respects. I've made the critical newbie mistake -- I left my cell phone on. Sorry.

HEMMER: That's all right. Hey, listen, Karl, you only do that one time. Only one time will that happen.

ROVE: Sorry. And on your program, Bill. I can't believe that.

HEMMER: Well, I hope -- I hope that person calling you is very important. Go ahead.

ROVE: Yeah. No. Look, the -- it's all right to be out of the public life for a little while. But the problem is, is if this drama on the Democratic side is going to go on for weeks and months. It's six months until the convention. It's three -- over three months until they finish this process in June of primaries and caucuses. We've got six weeks until the primary in Pennsylvania. We have eight weeks until North Carolina and Indiana.

You cannot expect John McCain to be silent for the next three to six months and then come back in in the final 61 days of the election after the Republican National Convention, try and say everything he needs to say and share everything he needs to share with the American people about who he is and what he stands for.

HEMMER: Fair point.

ROVE: So, he's got to find a way to get back into this dialogue in the weeks ahead. It's not bad that he's getting a little bit of time to re-energize, but he's got to get back in the public frame.

From the March 10 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:

HANNITY: Barack Obama is hoping that his victory in Wyoming over the weekend will translate into winning more delegates in tomorrow's Mississippi primary. But the fierce fight for the nomination still looks far from over. Joining us now with more, Fox News contributor -- we call him "the Architect" -- Karl Rove is back.

[...]

HANNITY: Hey, Karl, I'm going to be interviewing Governor Mitt Romney tomorrow and Senator McCain on Thursday. You talked about an M & M ticket. You still there?

ROVE: Yeah. Well, I -- look, I'm just reporting what I'm hearing from a lot of people out there, is that, as they go through these, there's just seems to me to be a growing enthusiasm out there for an M & M ticket, and -- particularly on the part of conservatives.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dexteritas0071418 (March 11, 2008 2:47 pm ET)
         
      I mean, if any of these shows tried to paint Rove in the light of an objective commentator, I can see why this would be a problem..but I doubt that labeling him "former Bush advisor" does that.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tommy (March 11, 2008 3:12 pm ET)
           
        Exactly Dex, this is just nitpicking by MMFA.  Find me a person who has one iota of political knowledge who watches these shows and says "Karl Rove, who is he?"  His slanted and uber partisan commenting should be no surprise to anyone, including MMFA.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (March 11, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
             
          No it isnt nitpicking and Hannity is particularly bad about this. When you host a person who has a specific ax to grind you disclose that. It is basic journalistic ethics. When you put a guy on to discuss the presidential race and he is conneted to a candidate it absoluty should be disclosed. NOT just that he is a republican but that he is helping the McCain campaign.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by lolo (March 11, 2008 7:42 pm ET)
               

            You love to bytch and complain don't ya Solon? Do you really believe they intentionally didn't disclose it?

               great work MMFA. Know republican supporter and advisor  supports republican...

            what a story.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (March 11, 2008 8:05 pm ET)
                 
              You LOVE to show your ignorance dont you? Whether it is intentional is irrelevant but YES I think they intentionally didnt disclose it. Hannity has a pattern of EXACTLY not disclosing when his guest has a conflict of interest. The ethics here are clear. IF a guest is supposed to comment on a campaign and they have an connection with one of the candidates it is unethical not to disclose that. Try to have some dim conception what you are talking about you insufferable moron.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by roundhouse (March 11, 2008 8:43 pm ET)
               
            "When you put a guy on to discuss the presidential race and he is conneted to a candidate it absoluty should be disclosed. "

            Dang skippy, Solon. I didn't know Rove was doing work for McSame.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (March 11, 2008 4:39 pm ET)
           
        Does MMFA ever disclose its close relationship with the Hillary Clinton campaign?


        I didn't think so...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by roundhouse (March 11, 2008 8:45 pm ET)
           
        "but I doubt that labeling him "former Bush advisor" does that." How about labeling him current McSame advisor?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 11, 2008 2:49 pm ET)
         
      What's the big surprise? FOX News also doesn't identify itself as the propaganda arm of the Republican Party. Is there even one ignorant soul in the entire country who doesn't understand that?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (March 11, 2008 4:02 pm ET)
           

        I wish there was one – there are millions. Don’t kid yourself. Every day I read a blog from someone who’s parent or grandparent has parroted some ridiculous “fact” they heard on Fox News. This 70 and 80 something “base” of Faux News watches the candy coated “news” because that is what they want to hear. They REALLY believe what they hear from Hannity, O’Reilley, et al and are convinced that WE are the looney ones – the un-American far-left Nazi commies out to ruin America with our secular progressive pro-gay agenda who are always looking for handouts and a free ride because we are too lazy to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps.  That’s the Faux News message being sold to America in one sentence! -  And they have plenty of “buyers”.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (March 11, 2008 2:50 pm ET)
         

      I think the way this guy has been treated is disgusting.  How could his enemies get away with saying these kinds of things while involved in a campaign?  We need to stand up in order to have MM(vl) get more coverage about this kind of treatment by people involved in campaigning.  Enough of the namecalling already.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6Sbz8XzsWs&feature=related

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 11, 2008 3:02 pm ET)
           
        I'm sorry - you think Rove is being treated unfairly?  Your comment is quite vague...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (March 11, 2008 3:09 pm ET)
             

          Polishkyle,

          I think that the link shows how someone is being treated unfairly.  And rather than bring this kind of story to light of day, MM(vl) would choose to deflect from what is really going on in campaigns.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 11, 2008 3:22 pm ET)
               
            Sorry - I didn't click your link, and I'm still not going to.  I don't patronize Youtube for political commentary, too biased and unfiltered.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by proudconservative (March 11, 2008 3:47 pm ET)
                 
              How can something be unfiltered AND biased?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 11, 2008 3:59 pm ET)
                   
                Well, it's unfiltered because anyone can post whatever they want there.  It's biased because you posted the link, and your own bias is apparent in your handle.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by proudconservative (March 11, 2008 5:14 pm ET)
                     

                  kylemeister,

                  Please, take a peek.  Sometimes looking into the eyes of the darkside of the force is good for the soul.  I promise that you will survive and live to post again, but I cannot guarantee it will be without bias or liberal filtering!

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by solon (March 11, 2008 6:27 pm ET)
                       
                    How would you know ProudMoron? You LIVE on the darkside and never venture forth into the reality based universe
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (March 11, 2008 3:27 pm ET)
               
            ProudMoron is again whining that Media Matters doesnt do things the way HE wants them done. WWAAAHHHHH. Rove is a weasel on a good day. Attacking him doesnt even constitute misinformation but certainly not CONSERVATIVE media misinformation.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 11, 2008 3:33 pm ET)
               

            Rove should be in jail.

            Free Don Siegelman!

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Sueelldd (March 11, 2008 3:41 pm ET)
                 
              I remember the great David Schuster lon AMESSNBC last year said Karl Rove would be indicted.  It never happened. 
              Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (March 11, 2008 3:46 pm ET)
                   
                Rove came mighty close to being indicted. If you recall when his lawyer caught wind that Rove had been contradicted by another witness Rove recollection was suddenly refreshed and he went scurrying back to the prosecutor's office to correct his previous statements.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 11, 2008 3:13 pm ET)
           
        PC, though you destroyed my nickname, I hope you were able to read my response yesterday.  I am glad we were able to have a discussion even if we don't agree.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (March 11, 2008 3:34 pm ET)
           
        Sorry dude. Anything that happens to Rove is a revisiting of his past "sins" anyway. I can't think of anyone who deserves more bad kharma than this guy. Ye shall reap what ye shall sow? Right?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dbeden4153 (March 11, 2008 3:48 pm ET)
           

        PC (how fitting ;) ), I don't get it.  Are you saying it's disgusting what they are doing to Karl Rove?  which is what this thread is about?  Or are you saying that about Obama, which is what your link suggests? Or are you being sarcastic?  It's especially frustrating because Obama doesn't mention Karl Rove once in that entire speech.

        Really, Karl Rove gets every bit of what his name engenders for the rest of history.  Why McCain would even associate himself with Rove after what he did to him is appalling.

        Karl Rove has also stepped beyond the bounds of Orwellian thought in what many journalists have described as "Rovism."  Orwellian thought suggest that all politicians operate in an Orwellian nimbus where words don't mean what they normally mean, while Rovism posits there is no objective, verifiable reality at all.  Reality is what you say it is.   That is a dangerous and corruptive force in our political system.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by BillJ-MN (March 11, 2008 10:03 pm ET)
           

        PC, did you link to the correct youtube video?  That was Obama responding effectively and with good humor to the Clintons' suggestion of him as Vice-President.  Unless I missed it, there was no mention of Rove at all.  There was no namecalling.

        What was the point of the link?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (March 11, 2008 3:10 pm ET)
         

      I suppore everytime some accuses Hillary of being Rovian, its another chunk knocked off his delcate and sensitive heart. When will the pain end for Karl?

      :-$ 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 11, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
         
      I watched a Frontline profile of Karl Rove the other night. If Rove is advising McCain, and if history is any indicator, watch for McCain to play the anti-gay card at some point during the general campaign. It's a Rove trademark.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (March 11, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
         
      It fits their usual pattern of behavior.  I mean, how many times did Sean Hannity have Rudy Giuliani on a a guest, without ever mentioning that he had helped raise money for Rudy by speaking at his campaign events???
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sueelldd (March 11, 2008 3:25 pm ET)
         
      I actually have started to like Karl Rove on FOX, I have started watching FOX lately, I got tired of the hate at MSNBC and the slowness of CNN.  He is funny and smart. The network is biased , no question but so his MSNBC.  They hate Hillary more than FOX does.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 11, 2008 3:32 pm ET)
           

        "He is funny and smart."

        ...and he would have no compunction about running you over with a truck (figuratively speaking) if that's what he had to do to get a candidate elected, Sue. Somehow, I can't divorce Rove's sinister side from a charming screen personna. But, to each his own...

        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (March 11, 2008 5:04 pm ET)
             

          He is funny and smart.

          That's what Hitler's close friends used to say about Adolf.....

          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (March 11, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
               
            ...a good dancer, too.  ;>)
            Report Abuse
            • Author by wzwriter (March 11, 2008 7:43 pm ET)
                 

              ...a good dancer, too.  ;>)

              Sounds like a new reality show for Tom Bergeron to host:

              "DANCING WITH THE DICTATORS".

              :-)

              Report Abuse
    • Author by copiousdissent.blogspot.com (March 11, 2008 3:27 pm ET)
         
      MMFA reports without disclosing ties to Hillary Clinton.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 11, 2008 3:28 pm ET)
           
        Copiousstupidity bloviated without substance ... AGAIN
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dbeden4153 (March 11, 2008 3:53 pm ET)
             
          I firmly believe that CD can not comprehend the reason for this website's existence. He just sees it as a political tool of the left.  That's okay, it's his right to believe that, but any journalistic background would tell you the necessity of this site.  As well as cites that highlight liberal misinformation.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (March 11, 2008 5:25 pm ET)
               

            "He just sees it as a political tool of the left." 

            It's called projection...because that's exactly how the right wing operates. Prime example: FOX News.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (March 11, 2008 5:37 pm ET)
                 
              Copious Dysentery is just angry that this site is so biased. He thinks it should be more even handed and unbiased, like his site.

              You did know that CD has a website, right?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (March 11, 2008 5:47 pm ET)
                   
                Yes, I do know that. I checked it out once...and that's enough for me.  ;>)
                Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (March 11, 2008 3:35 pm ET)
           
        That's because, there are none, but that's OK. Keep repeating that old carrot.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (March 11, 2008 3:28 pm ET)
         

      If Rove were a formal advisor, MMFA might have more of a case.  But even without disclosure, few would see Rove as an objective analyst.

      Further, I hope McCain loads up his campaign with these Bush hacks.  All the better to help ensure he is thoroughly thumped in November. 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sueelldd (March 11, 2008 3:30 pm ET)
           
        I wouldnt wish that, these people are nasty and know how to win. I am sure that they are behind the Spitzer leak. I would be 60-40 McCain wins in November.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tbone (March 11, 2008 4:41 pm ET)
             

          You overestimate their support base.  McCain is already overplaying the Bush connection and has very fractured and tenuous support.  He's only the nominee because the field was so weak to begin with and the Republicans are disheveled (Fiscal vs. social vs. religious vs neo-conservatism).  They are not their father's GOP. 

          The Dem nominee just has to stay on message "Do you really want 4 more years?" and avoid the mudslinging to the extent possible.  Further McCain's flip-flops (immigration, campaign finance, fiscal policy, lobbyists, etc.) hurt him with both his base and with independents - these will be laid bare by the press and in the presidential debates.  He is only steadfast in being even more hawkish on Iraq and "preemptive" war than Bush - a position which has minority (and dwiddling) support as the numbers and facts keep revealing themselves (2 to 3 trillion cost, $108 barrel oil, no Saddam-Al Qaeda link, no threat to National Security).

          Dems are turning out in record numbers for the primaries.  Barring some Dem cataclysm between now and Nov., they will do so again.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 11, 2008 3:50 pm ET)
           
        The point is to keep watching. If McCain's general election campaign starts taking on more Rovian tricks then you will know how active Rove is. As I said above, for one example, if McCain brings up homosexual issues then that's a Rove trademark.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (March 11, 2008 4:05 pm ET)
             
          That's only closeted homosexual deflection from Rove no doubt when he starts talking about homosexual "issues" and or "agenda".
          Report Abuse
      • Author by ecmarauder (March 11, 2008 4:28 pm ET)
           
        I hope McCain "loads up" too,Tbone. Have you forgotten what Rove and the "bushies" did in '00 and '04? THEY WON!!!!! Hee hee hee.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (March 11, 2008 6:31 pm ET)
             
          Yeah in 2000 the only election they WON was 5 to 4. They LOST the popular vote by more than half a million votes. Good luck getting McCain in after duplicating THAT performance.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by ecmarauder (March 11, 2008 3:36 pm ET)
         
      stop the presses---karl rove donates to mccain campaign!!!!!!! could this possibly be news to anyone? wow,he might be "informally advising" mccain!!!! it would be newsworthy if he wasn't. c'mon, mmfa, you gotta be more relevant than this or your mind-numbed followers may begin to question your relevance and credibility...........naaah,who am i kidding,not gonna happen.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (March 11, 2008 4:04 pm ET)
         

      copiousdissent.blogspot.com,

      "MMFA reports without disclosing ties to Hillary Clinton."

      Really, I'm fascinated. Please tell us alllllll about it. <sarcasam>

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 11, 2008 5:52 pm ET)
         
      So the FALSE NEWSCHANNEL has the PILLSBURY DOUGHBOY on as a guest ,kind of like HINRICH HIMMLER being a guest on DR. JOSEPH GOEBBLES  radio program . definitly fair and ballanced.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 11, 2008 6:06 pm ET)
         
      This is the same Karl Rove that criticized Congressman Jack Murrtha for wanting to pull out of IRAQ.He called  Murrtha ,a decorated war vet,a coward for wanting to ''cut and run''all the while Rove avoided service and putting his neck on the line when his time came up. We call people like that CHICKENHAWKS and I HAVE NO RESPECT for ROVE and people like him.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 11, 2008 6:43 pm ET)
           
        You gonna post your derail the thread attempt in all the threads? I hear your bridge calling troll.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (March 12, 2008 9:10 am ET)
             

          Oh no! Not Glen Beck talking bad about the so called "liberal media" and all. Jeesh. When are these guys gonna figure it out that the liberal media that they decry so much, they're part of it. Glen Beck, O'Reilly, and whoever else you want to throw in there ARE the media. How often do we keep hearing about conservative talk show hosts DOMINATING radio. If the media were so "liberal" wouldn't this not be true? And yet, it is. Hmm...

           

          Report Abuse
    • Author by lolo (March 11, 2008 7:39 pm ET)
         
      yeah...I smell coverup. Silly!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 11, 2008 8:06 pm ET)
           
        It is a standard breach of journalistic ethics. I smell a moron.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.