About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN again raised issue of tax records without noting that McCain has not released his

March 12, 2008 7:50 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: On CNN's The Situation Room, Brian Todd reported that each presidential candidate "is under more pressure now to release" different types of information, stating that "[f]or [Sen.] Hillary Clinton, it's those elusive tax records." But Todd did not mention that Sen. John McCain has yet to release his tax returns.

24 Comments

On the March 6 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, correspondent Brian Todd reported on accusations that the presidential candidates are withholding information, but while mentioning Sen. Hillary Clinton's tax returns, Todd did not note that Sen. John McCain, like Clinton, has yet to release his tax returns. The Wall Street Journal reported on February 23 that McCain "hasn't released his tax returns either. His campaign has said it won't decide whether to release the returns until after he is officially the nominee."

While introducing Todd's report, host Wolf Blitzer stated, "They attack each other over full disclosure, but it turns out each of the Democratic candidates is accused of withholding some information, information people want to know more about." In his introduction, Blitzer did not mention McCain, who has also been accused of withholding information "people want to know more about." A February 27 Washington Post editorial noted that McCain has "so far refused" to release his returns, adding, "Most troubling, Mr. McCain isn't even pledging to release his returns once he becomes the nominee."

Following Blitzer's introduction, Todd stated: "Well, Wolf, from tax information to medical records, some information has come out in drips and drabs, and some hasn't come out much at all. But each candidate is under more pressure now to release what they've got." Todd stated during his report, "For Hillary Clinton, it's those elusive tax records," and aired a video clip of Clinton saying, "I will certainly, you know, work toward releasing, and we will get that done and in the public domain." Todd then said, "For John McCain, it's his melanoma surgery several years ago," but Todd did not mention that McCain has not released his tax records.

As Media Matters for America noted, on the February 28 Situation Room, commentator Jack Cafferty similarly did not mention McCain's failure to release his filings, saying: "There's a lot of information that voters still don't have about Hillary Clinton, including the White House records from when she was first lady and her tax returns." Moments later, Cafferty added: "As for the tax returns, Hillary Clinton also said at the debate that she would release them once she becomes the nominee or, quote, 'even earlier,' unquote, but her campaign seems to be backing away from that statement now, suggesting that Clinton won't release the financial information until tax time in April." Cafferty later asked viewers to respond to the question: "How important is it for Hillary Clinton to release her tax returns and White House records now?"

Media Matters has documented other examples of media figures noting that Clinton has not released her tax returns without mentioning that McCain also has not done so.

From the March 11 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BLITZER: All right, Soledad, thanks. A lot more numbers coming up; I know you and your team are crunching those numbers all the time.

They attack each other over full disclosure, but it turns out each of the Democratic candidates is accused of withholding some information, information people want to know more about. Let's go back to Brian Todd. He's watching this part of the story for us. What's the information, Brian, in question?

TODD: Well, Wolf, from tax information to medical records, some information has come out in drips and drabs, and some hasn't come out much at all. But each candidate is under more pressure now to release what they've got.

[begin video clip]

TODD: For Barack Obama, it's his dealings with indicted former fundraiser Tony Rezko.

OBAMA: The notion that we haven't been forthcoming I would dispute.

TODD: For Hillary Clinton, it's those elusive tax records.

CLINTON: I will certainly, you know, work toward releasing, and we will get that done and in the public domain.

TODD: For John McCain, it's his melanoma surgery several years ago.

Each major candidate now under extraordinary pressure to be more forthcoming about at least one aspect of their past. A USA Today op-ed says, "[V]oters aren't getting all the information they need to make informed choices." The campaigns all dispute that.

Senator Clinton's promised to release her tax records next month -- same general time frame for McCain and his medical file. Obama and his advisers say they've answered all questions about the candidate's relationship with Rezko as they've come up.

Some information, like medical and tax records, is often released after a nominee is selected. But with the Democratic race still so tight, some observers say now is the time for all White House hopefuls to get it all out there.

MARK HALPERIN (Time magazine senior political analyst): Things like taxes, medical records, your real estate transactions have become controversial. Those things are generally revealed, and candidates who don't reveal them potentially face a price with voters.

[end video clip]

TODD: Now, this is certainly not the first time issues like this have come up in campaigns. Bill and Hillary Clinton released some of the information on their Whitewater land deal during the 1992 campaign, and that, of course, came back to hit them later -- Wolf.

BLITZER: Brian Todd, thanks very much for that.

He's battled cancer and he's come out on top, but what does his latest medical checkup tell us about the health of the presidential candidate John McCain? Dr. Sanjay Gupta standing by.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by edenscape246494 (March 12, 2008 8:22 pm ET)
         

      Senator Clinton's promised to release her tax records next month -- same general time frame for McCain and his medical file. Obama and his advisers say they've answered all questions about the candidate's relationship with Rezko as they've come up.

      WTF does Rezko have to do with releasing tax records?  This breaks paragraph format, the appropriate line is Obama released his

      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (March 12, 2008 8:29 pm ET)
         

      Does any candidate have to?  We know the back and forth with Obama and Hilliary but he presently has no opponents in the primaries.

      A deflection from something more pertinent like Mrs. Ferraro's rasist comments.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jawill11 (March 12, 2008 10:00 pm ET)
           

        Yeah, the media's really been ignoring that Ferraro incident.  I didn't even know what you were referring to at first. 

         Over at Crooks & Liars, they have a clip of the clown Steve Doocy saying a similar thing about Spitzer, that the liberal media is not harping on this like they were for David Vitter.  

        However, I agee with your opinion that the tax return disclosure is pretty meaningless all around.  I'm not sure what that is supposed to show.   

        Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (March 13, 2008 1:34 am ET)
           

        "A deflection from something more pertinent like Mrs. Ferraro's rasist comments."

        What racist comments? 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Governor (March 13, 2008 2:07 pm ET)
             

          The racist comments all over the media that are not getting ANY play by MMfA because it was not "conservative" misinformation.  Perhaps racism is more informative when it comes from "certain" people. 


            

          Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (March 13, 2008 10:14 am ET)
           

        A deflection from something more pertinent like Mrs. Ferraro's rasist comments.

        No longer pertinent.  Ms. Ferraro has resigned from the Clinton campaign, so your point is moot.  I'd be far more concerned with all the GOP politicians like Trent Lott who are still snuggling up to white supremicist groups like the CCC, or candidates like John mcCain who will not distance themselves from hatemongors like John Hagee or the morons at FoKKKus On The Family and Bob Jones University.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 13, 2008 7:19 pm ET)
           
        QUICK look over there. Or THERE or anywhere but the TOPIC.  Give me a break.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by notanotherconservative2254 (March 12, 2008 9:04 pm ET)
         

      Wow, CNN didn't repeat Hillary's MMFA talking points?

       

      H O W     D A R E   T H E Y !!!!!!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by edenscape246494 (March 12, 2008 9:07 pm ET)
           

        What does he have to hide?

        Isn't that the wire tap argument gents?  A little consistency please

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 13, 2008 2:12 pm ET)
           
        Sure because its fine to harp on an issue about Clinton without mentioning the Republican in the SAME BOAT. Its a TALKING point that anyone dare think a Republican ought to be held to the same standards as a Democrat. Sheesh.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (March 13, 2008 1:36 am ET)
         

      Just what reason does the MSM have to harp on Clinton's "tax records" but not mention McCain's?

      I mean, doesn't this go beyond a double standard, to the point of sheer favoritism and bias?  

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MiddleLeft (March 13, 2008 9:02 am ET)
           

        Just what reason does the MSM have to harp on Clinton's "tax records" but not mention McCain's?

        It's because Hillary is married to Bill who makes a lot of money giving talks (and who knows what else) and maybe they file a joint return and maybe there is something there that they can't hide that qualifies as dirt. McCain is assumed to not be able to raise enough money for there to be any interest. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by BC6343 (March 13, 2008 8:39 am ET)
         

      *

      I confused... I've noticed the only job that this Media Matters seems to have is to carry water for Hillary.  Am I wrong here? Do they ever report favorably on anyone else, The President? A Republican? Or are they just another hatchet man for Hillary and the dems?

       

      *bert 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 13, 2008 10:30 am ET)
           
        you confused
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dbeden4153 (March 13, 2008 11:34 am ET)
             

          you vewy confused.

          Read MMfA's mission statement, which most everyone here believes they hold up to quite well.

          And yes, they're partisan, because they only go after conservative misinformation.  But they aren't partisan toward the Democrats, they're partisan towards liberals.

          And still, a valuable resource for this age of Rovism.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (March 13, 2008 12:24 pm ET)
             

          you confused

          He totally confused.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 13, 2008 2:13 pm ET)
           
        Yes you are wrong. They report the media misinformation no matter where the chips fly. I know you were TOLD to believe this by your screechmonkey of choice but that doesnt mean it is any way connected to reality.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Goodfella57 (March 13, 2008 2:56 pm ET)
             

          No SOLON...YOU'RE wrong.

          MMfA ONLY reports what is beneficial for their prime supporter, Hillary Clinton. You know it and I know it so why not just admit it.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (March 13, 2008 7:21 pm ET)
               

            Because it is HIVEMIND STUPIDITY and only fools simpleminded people. The go where the con misinformation is. They have threads on Obama her challenger and you are just deluded as usual why dont YOU admit that you never know what you are talking about.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 13, 2008 12:42 pm ET)
         
      Seeing that Mr Todd brought up this isssue, perhaps he himself should release his own tax records ? if it is good for the goose, is it not good for the gander ?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Goodfella57 (March 13, 2008 2:25 pm ET)
         

      I see now how it works here at MMfA and it's BRILLIANT: 

      When you want to smear the republican candidate, simply cite a media outlet on an issue and create an item on what was 'omitted'. It shifts from simply reporting the supposed misinformation to a smear of the candidate.

      Examples from todays items:

      "CNN report on McCain trip to Middle East ignored misleading claims from previous trip"

      "CNN again raised issue of tax records without noting that McCain has not released his"

      "Hume joins other media in ignoring McCain's failure to commit to tax return release"

      "AP reported McCain attacks on Dems' threats to withdraw from NAFTA, ignored his own 2000 ABM Treaty threat"

      "Fox hosts Rove without disclosing reported role with McCain campaign"

      These examples are not about the media misinformation, its a way for MMfA to smear McCain or any other candidate or political cause with whom it doesn't agree. This is not so bad except for the fact that MMfA purports to 'not support or endorse any political candidate'.  Now that's an outright lie, isn't it? 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 13, 2008 7:25 pm ET)
           
        WWAAHHH stop showing the con media spinning WWAAHHHH. Your first exmple is a valid point. I think it is weak. I didnt even go to the thread for that reason. The second and third are about them making a stink about something a Dem didnt do while not mentioning the Rep was in EXACTLY THE SAME BOAT. Clear double standard the last is the media overlooking a clear case of hypocrisy when reporting a story about McCain. the last three look perfectly valid to me.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Goodfella57 (March 14, 2008 1:58 am ET)
             

          SOLON...

          Look, I have NEVER advocated that MMfA should stop "showing the con media spinning". I only want to point out the hypocrisy in statements such as,'MMfA does not support a political party or candidate'.  Clearly..that's ridiculous - but I guess they need to preserve their 501 (c3) status. 

          Again, I don't advocate censorship and I enjoy the ability to post comments here.  But I get annoyed that MMfA is engaged in actively silencing free speech in the media through the "Take Action" part of its website. It goes beyond misinformation and into disagreements on opinions. I think organized boycotts are wrong - (and that applies to Bill O'Rielly, as well).  

          Report Abuse
    • Author by BreakerBaker (March 13, 2008 11:43 pm ET)
         

      It seems kind of silly that no one brings up the obvious: Sen Clinton, who is still in the midst of a presidential primary campaign (one she has loaned at least $5 million), and whose opponent has released his tax returns (and challenged her to do the same) has chosen instead to hold back on the release of the returns until just before the last 'big' primary, while John McCain is, for all intents and purposes, his parties nominee, and is therefore not under any pressure from an opponent to ensure transparency. I'm sure that McCain will be expected/pressured to release his returns once his opponent becomes more certain.

      I'm really surprised nobody's said this. It's not like it's a mystery...or even remotely confusing. Certainly not misinformation (which, of course, has a definition).

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.