About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Noonan, Brzezinski mischaracterized Clinton's 60 Minutes response about Obama's religion

March 14, 2008 1:27 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: While discussing Sen. Barack Obama, The Wall Street Journal's Peggy Noonan said, "Remember that thing Mrs. Clinton said where she was asked, 'Do you think he's a Christian?' And she said one of those formulations like 'Oh, as far as I know, look into it.' " MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski replied, "Wink-wink, yeah." In fact, during an interview on CBS' 60 Minutes, Clinton was not asked, "Do you think he's a Christian?" -- when asked, "You don't believe that Senator Obama is a Muslim?" she immediately responded, "Of course not." Moreover, she compared "ridiculous rumors" circulating about her to rumors about Obama, making clear that the Obama rumors are false.

38 Comments

On the March 14 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe, while discussing Sen. Barack Obama, Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan said, "Remember that thing Mrs. [Sen. Hillary] Clinton said where she was asked, 'Do you think he's a Christian?' And she said one of those formulations like 'Oh, as far as I know, look into it.' " Co-host Mika Brzezinski replied, "Wink-wink, yeah." In fact, during an interview on the March 2 edition of CBS' 60 Minutes, Clinton was not asked, "Do you think he's a Christian?" -- when asked, "You don't believe that Senator Obama is a Muslim?" she immediately responded, "Of course not," as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented. Indeed, it was in her fourth separate response to Steve Kroft's repeated questions about Obama's religion that she asserted that Obama was not a Muslim "as far as I know," and Clinton followed that statement by noting that she, too, has been the victim of "ridiculous rumors" -- making clear that she knows the Obama rumors are false. Further, Clinton did not, in her interview, tell Kroft to "look into it."

From the March 14 edition of MSNBC's Morning Joe:

NOONAN: I think Obama -- you know what he really has to do? Remember that thing Mrs. Clinton said where she was asked, "Do you think he's a Christian?" And she said --

BRZEZINSKI: Right.

NOONAN: -- one of those formulations like --

JOE SCARBOROUGH (co-host): Right.

NOONAN: -- "Oh, as far as I know, look into it."

BRZEZINSKI: Wink-wink, yeah.

NOONAN: You know, what I think Obama has to do is make a speech or make remarks, not manipulative, not creepy, just honest, about what his religious views are and what his Christianity is and how it informs his life. Just go and do it now. He didn't put this on the table. Somebody else did. But I really think he ought to address it.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Governor (March 14, 2008 1:29 pm ET)
         
      Holy crap, they sound like the gossiping in some high school cafeteria.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sueelldd (March 14, 2008 1:35 pm ET)
         

      Keith Olbermann also said this the other night, but yet no MMFA thread about this ? Why? It is about time the partnership or secret deal between MMFA and Olbermann be exposed, it is hurting MMFA legitimacy.

      Worse yet, after what President Clinton said during the South Carolina primary, comparing the Obama and Jesse Jackson campaigns, a disturbing but only border line remark, after what some in the black community have perceived as a racial undertone to the 3:00 a.m. ad, a disturbing but only borderline interpretation, and after the moments hesitation in her own answer on “60 Minutes” about Obama‘s religion, a disturbing but only borderline vagueness—

      Report Abuse
      • Author by werner (March 14, 2008 1:46 pm ET)
           
        I have had my fill of media matters supporting Hillary, or at least defending her from those who say she has said negative things about Obama that perhaps don't  repeat precisely what she said.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by JLyons (March 14, 2008 1:48 pm ET)
           
        Outstanding Sueeld, and you are correct to ask that question. Where is the MMFA outrage at Olbermann? Why the double standard?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by SFnomad (March 14, 2008 4:03 pm ET)
             

          There is no double standard.  Why does MMFAs mission statement need to be show to you guys again and again?

          Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

          If Olbermann were a conservative commentator, they'd be on him as well.  He's not, so they're not.  No double standard at all.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by tommy (March 14, 2008 6:31 pm ET)
               
            No, wrong, there have been instances where MMFA has most definitely corrected liberal media personalities and pundits as well.  And there is nothing in their statement thay says only conservative commentators will be called out, it is not about the messenger, it is about the message......or so they say, but we beginning to find out differently, aren't we?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (March 14, 2008 9:16 pm ET)
                 
              Now that you have found out differently, you can stop protesting so much; you know, Lord, help me to change those things I can, accept those things I cannot change, and wisdom to know the difference.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (March 14, 2008 1:48 pm ET)
           

        I agree Sue, as hard as that may be to believe.

        This passage from Olbermann and MMFA's neglect of it (so far) really makes all the trantrums over the WPITW mentions seem trivial by comparison.

        There is no question that MMFA watches Olbermann intently.  They need to show that they don't ally themselves with or live in fear of any member of the MSM no matter how much they may source MMFA's material, and this the best opportunity in my recent memory for them to do it.  

        Report Abuse
      • Author by RoberttheP (March 14, 2008 1:50 pm ET)
           

        Sueeld I could not agree with you more.

        Well said. And great research on your part.

         

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Governor (March 14, 2008 1:52 pm ET)
           
        This thread - which I understand must be about your pal - includes a misquote by Noonan and an accusation that Clinton lied from Brzezinski.  I don't think that KO's "borderline vagueness" remark would make for a very substantive thread.  Really, Do you?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RoberttheP (March 14, 2008 2:00 pm ET)
             
          I do, what was so "vague" about what she said, and why is Olbermann allowed to spew that Conservative misinformation?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (March 14, 2008 2:01 pm ET)
             
          It's not just "borderline vagueness."  It's also "moments hesitation in her own answer" in the face of MMFA's "she immediately responded, 'Of course not.'"
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Governor (March 14, 2008 2:02 pm ET)
               
            I concede your points.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (March 14, 2008 2:17 pm ET)
                 

              And I'm not one to gloat, Gov. 

              I've been coming to this site for a long time defending MMFA's "Worst Person In The World" mentions by pointing out that MMFA brings up any and all mentions of MMFA's name or their material that subsequently pops up in the media, and that Keith's throwaway segment is just another example of it.

              But this is MMFA's time to shine, and they're really blowing it.  They've had a day and a half to analyze and expose it and so far we've seen nothing.

              Our resident MMFA detractors are likely going to give me a lot of grief for me only just beginning to figure this out.  The only explanation I can muster would be that my political persuasion has made me more ambivalent about this and it took such an obvious gloss over on the part of MMFA to make me come around.

              So to all those detractors I've been at odds with over the WPITW mentions, go ahead get your shots in at me, I can take it.  This truly looks like the tipping point for me.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Governor (March 14, 2008 2:29 pm ET)
                   

                It's complicated stuff, though. KO's Clinton comment was not exactly "conservative misinformation".  He accused her of being 'one of them' so to speak.  Yes, you can pull from his 1700 words a snippet or two that reads like "conservative misinformation" but what he said 2 nights ago does not advance some conservative agenda.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by pete592 (March 14, 2008 2:32 pm ET)
                     
                  All the respect in the world, Gov, but "Snippets" are the vast majority of what MMFA deals in.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Governor (March 14, 2008 3:08 pm ET)
                       
                    Understood.  Still, though, calling out KO for calling Clinton republican-like, makes for confusing conservative misinformation, to say the least.
                    Report Abuse
      • Author by Preston (March 14, 2008 2:17 pm ET)
           

        I agree with you, Sue, Olbermann was out-of-bounds with that one. Furthermore, who in the black community thought of Clinton's 3am ad had racial undertones? That's a new one to me. Fear mongering, yes, but racial undertones?

        After this election season, I think the American public will be so fed up, it will be a LONG time before we make a black man or woman a nominee again. We'll stick to electing white men, it's less emotionally draining. Well, for me, at least.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by BillJ-MN (March 14, 2008 4:01 pm ET)
             

          You probably missed the story.  I wish I had.  It was really stupid.

          In the 3 AM ad one of the children has "GOOD NIGHT" all over his pajamas.  In one extremely small clip the letters NIG are visible and slightly isolated.

          It created a small amount of internet buzz for a small amount of time.  Both small amounts were more than it deserved.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by MiddleLeft (March 14, 2008 3:21 pm ET)
           

        And she said one of those formulations like 'Oh, as far as I know, look into it.' ".

        I think the use of an false indirect quote rates a mention whereas opining that she hesitated and was too vague does NOT rise to that level.  The "look into it'" phrase is especially imaginative, fictional, and offensive.  If Noonan had said she hesitated in her answer, she wouldn't have got a mention. Her statement clearly mis-characterizes what HRC actually said.  KO offered an opinion about the way she delivered the answer and said he didn't like it.  Fair enough.  Noonan is out to lunch on this one.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (March 14, 2008 6:52 pm ET)
           

         "Keith Olbermann also said this the other night, but yet no MMFA thread about this ? Why? It is about time the partnership or secret deal between MMFA and Olbermann be exposed, it is hurting MMFA legitimacy."

        I detest Olbermann too, but there's no conspiracy.

        MMFA's charter is to expose conservative bias, not just bias in general. He doesn't fit the role.

        But he has become despicable. Daily Howler is starting in on him-- it's a pretty good nailing...

        Remember, this is a 47 year old guy who has a need to refer to good looking 20 year old girls as "sluts" and "tramps." 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Idiot Patrol (March 15, 2008 10:53 am ET)
           

        Thank you, Sue.  MMFA is not doing a good job of cleaning up behind Olbermann.  His bias toward Obama is hardly subtle.  Does anyone know if there has been any study to see if  a correlation exists between the demographic of Obama supporters and Countdown's new/increased viewership?  Is this a true bias he has, or is he pandering to his audience?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nonbearing137 (March 14, 2008 1:40 pm ET)
         
      i think there is hypersensitivy directed against hrc.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (March 14, 2008 1:46 pm ET)
         

      Does this make anybody else think that they're playing the game "let's you and him fight?"

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 14, 2008 1:52 pm ET)
         
      You would think that precision of thought and speech might be a qualification for those whose job it is to communicate information to the masses. Generally speaking, the media are today populated with lazy slugs who can't even accurately reconstruct a recorded, well-publicized event. It's like flunking an open book test.  
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 14, 2008 2:01 pm ET)
           
        One more thing... Many of us know, without being told by MMFA, that Peggy Noonan and Mika Brezinzki misstated what Hillary Clinton said. Then what's the point of ever listening to Peggy Noonan, Mika Brezinzki and a host of others if we know more information than they do? What's the point...? Perhaps their employers should be informed that they are considered by the public to be unreliable sources of information...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nonna403 (March 14, 2008 1:59 pm ET)
         
      I have never cared for Peggy Noonan. She always gave me the impression that she felt she was a cut above everyone.  Now I care even less.  As a journalist is she not compelled to be accurate and truthful? These talking heads should not be permitted distort people's statements in a effort to enhance the entertainment value of their worthless shows.  Their comments can be very damaging.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 14, 2008 2:27 pm ET)
           
        takes her forever to say things and when she completes her sentences, I usually forgot the original question. Noonan is a boring GOP hack, and no amount of makeover is going to hide that.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (March 14, 2008 2:38 pm ET)
           

        As a journalist is she not compelled to be accurate and truthful?

        Nope.  And as a right-wing hack, she's incapable of being accurate or truthful.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 14, 2008 2:17 pm ET)
         
      Noonan should know better . Religion is not a obstacle to becoming presidend, as well as Commander-in-chief is also not a requirement. I strongly believe the american people have it in them to rise to the occasion. I can understand Brzezinski doing along with whatever piece of paper is thrust upon her hands. It is definately a fair question that was answered long ago and to keep bringing it up to fill the 24/7 news time slot is ridiculous. In my own humble opinion.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 14, 2008 3:35 pm ET)
           
        Think about it, Wolf...what are the chances of an atheist becoming President? Not very good in today's political climate. So having religion helps, right? Well, maybe, but not just any religion. Mitt Romney is a Mormon and there was great consternation even among his followers that Romney's Mormon faith would be a hindrance. What about Islam? Oooooh, no! Look at what Barack Hussein Obama went through. Is Christianity okay? You would think so... But if your preacher expounds on Afrocentric themes in his religious homilies forget about it. But, apparently it helps being Evangelical Christian if you want to be President. Look at George W. Bush. So what have we learned? It helps to be religious, but only certain flavors of religion. That's the American way. I'm sure it must be in the Constitution. Check it out...  ;>)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (March 14, 2008 3:40 pm ET)
             

          BTW, have we ever in our history had a Jewish President?

          I didn't think so...

          Report Abuse
    • Author by ElMiko (March 14, 2008 2:35 pm ET)
         

      With all due respect to MG, what are the ridiculous rumors circulating about Sen. Clinton?  If, as you say, the proof of her sincerity is that she repudiates similar attacks against her (ignoring the illogic of this correlation), then you must be able to point towards some examples of these "ridiculous rumors" of which she has been a victim.  For my part, i don't recall any rumors suggesting that HRC is a Muslim.

      And, before anyone says it, calling her (or her campaign) racist or over-emotional or dishonest or devious or calculating, aren't examples of rumors.  They are attacks.  Attacks which may or may not be accurate... as far as I know.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by gg (March 14, 2008 3:39 pm ET)
         
      NOONAN: You know, what I think Obama has to do is make a speech or make remarks, not manipulative, not creepy, just honest, about what his religious views are and what his Christianity is and how it informs his life.

      Hey Peggy what's your position on sex, missionary or what? Yes, I know it's personal but hey so is someone's religion and you want to know about that! People it is none of our business if he is a Muslim, Christian or Pagan (he is half African so I wouldn't be surprised if the wing-nuts trot this one out)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jolene (March 14, 2008 7:42 pm ET)
         

      I watched 60 minutes on the night in question Mrs Clinton was badgered by the announcer she kept answering him and he kept on asking her over and over if Obama was a Muslim.

       She said 'of course not'

      She said 'If Barak says he is not then I believe him'

      She answered over and over, until she said as far as I know he isn't.

      Make them apologize!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (March 14, 2008 9:22 pm ET)
         
      I think Noonan traded in her "thousand points of light" for a thousand dreary shards of buckshot.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nonbearing137 (March 17, 2008 12:51 pm ET)
         
      I think Noonan is well past her prime and should hang it up.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.