About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Chetry falsely claimed Franken said Rove and Libby "should be executed for treason" -- then denied having claimed it

March 17, 2008 4:38 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: Interviewing Al Franken on CNN's American Morning, Kiran Chetry falsely claimed that Al Franken, in a 2005 appearance on David Letterman's show, "said some things about Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, saying they should be executed for treason." In fact, as Franken noted, he had said that "George H.W. Bush, the president's father, was the head of the CIA, and he has said that outing a CIA agent is treason. ... And so, basically, what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed." Chetry then denied having said that Franken "advocated" executing Rove and Libby.

168 Comments

During an interview with Al Franken on the March 14 edition of CNN's American Morning, host Kiran Chetry falsely asserted to Franken, "You said some things about [former White House deputy chief of staff] Karl Rove and [former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney] Scooter Libby, saying they should be executed for treason." As the website Raw Story noted, Chetry was referring to an exchange Franken had with David Letterman on the October 21, 2005, edition of CBS' Late Show regarding Rove and Libby's roles in leaking the identity of former CIA operative Valerie Plame. However, during that interview, Franken did not assert that Rove and Libby "should be executed for treason." Rather, as Franken noted during his interview with Chetry, he asserted on the Late Show that "George H.W. Bush, the president's father, was the head of the CIA, and he has said that outing a CIA agent is treason," and then said, "what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed." Franken added, "I don't know how I feel about it because I'm basically against the death penalty, but they are going to be executed, it looks like."

In response to Chetry's claim that he "sa[id]" Rove and Libby "should be executed for treason," Franken stated, "I did not say that, Kiran," and later said, "I didn't even say that in a joking matter." After Franken described his original comments, Chetry asserted: "All I'm saying is, when you say things like that in the past ... and you're running, obviously those things come up." When Franken replied, "What you said was that I advocated the execution of Karl -- ," Chetry interrupted, and denied she made her earlier statement, saying, "I didn't say advocated. I didn't actually say you advocated [it]." Franken concluded of his Late Show remarks, "[T]he whole point of that was to show that outing a CIA agent is serious. That's what a satirist does."

From the March 14 edition of CNN's American Morning:

CHETRY: Now, you quoted something [Sen.] Norm Coleman [R-MN] said. You've said some controversial things in the past. You wrote a book called Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot. You said some things about --

FRANKEN: -- and Other Observations.

CHETRY: You said some things about Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, saying they should be executed for treason because they are --

FRANKEN: I did not say that, Kiran.

CHETRY: In a joking manner?

FRANKEN: Kiran.

CHETRY: In a satirical way?

FRANKEN: No. I didn't even say that in a joking manner.

CHETRY: What did you say?

FRANKEN: I was on David Letterman's show, and he asked me, this is, like, the day after it was revealed that they had outed -- participated in the outing of Valerie Plame, and he asked me what was gonna happen to him. And I said that President George H.W. Bush, before he was president, was director of the CIA. And George H.W. Bush said that outing a CIA agent was treason. I said, "David, you know what the penalty is for treason." And David asked me what was gonna happen to them. I said, "So I guess they might be executed, which I'm against. I don't know how -- I'm against the death penalty. And I'm afraid that [Vice President Dick] Cheney and [President George W.] Bush might be involved in some way, and so we should pass a constitutional amendment to ban the execution of a sitting president, because that would be very demoralizing to the American people." This was, you know, this is exactly what the Republican Party is doing. They take things out of --

CHETRY: Well, this is a CBS Late Show quote. OK, so the CBS Late Show quote, just so we're clear -- if you say, I mean, you were joking, you were joking around with David Letterman, he's a comedian, too -- is: "And so basically what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going be executed because outing a CIA agent is treason." And then you said -- you went on to say, "We should never, ever, ever execute a sitting president." All I'm saying is, when you say things like that in the past, and you're running --

FRANKEN: But no, but what you said was --

CHETRY: -- obviously those things come up.

FRANKEN: What you said was that I advocated the execution of Karl --

CHETRY: I didn't say advocated. I didn't say you advocated. I'm just talking about when you say things in the past that can be perceived as divisive, how do you then come together and say, "You know what? I can be a senator for everyone in the state"?

FRANKEN: Because people know the difference between being a satirist, and the whole point of that was to show that outing a CIA agent is serious. That's what a satirist does. A satirist points out what is actually serious, and anyone -- and, you know, the trick here is, they are going to be taking things out of context, and you're right. The Republican Party in Minnesota said that I advocated the execution of those guys. And I wasn't. And that's -- it was very clear to the Letterman audience and anyone who saw that, and, look, this is just ridiculous. We should be talking about foreclosures on homes. We should be talking about gas prices. We should be talking about loss of jobs, and that's what I'm going to do.

CHETRY: No, I agree.

FRANKEN: The reason they want -- the reason they want to do this kind of distraction is that Norm Coleman has such a terrible record on these things. So I'm not gonna let them do that, and then when they say that I advocated these things, they're only shooting themselves in the foot. They came out with this the day I announced. The day I announced, the first poll came out, said I was 22 points down to Norm Coleman. The last poll has me three points ahead of Norm Coleman. This doesn't work. And if they -- let them continue to do this. I'm gonna talk about the problems that face Minnesotans.

CHETRY: OK. And I just want to ask you this --

FRANKEN: I'm gonna talk about getting to universal health care.

CHETRY: Right.

FRANKEN: Go ahead.

From the October 21, 2005, edition of CBS' Late Show with David Letterman (Media Matters for America was unable to locate the full video of the segment; clips available here and here):

LETTERMAN: The feeling was that this report made the administration's decision to go to war look bad --

FRANKEN: Right. So they wanted to smear the guy who came back with the report, and so they outed his wife and said she sent him there, that she had -- and this is essentially -- you know, George H.W. Bush, the president's father, was the head of the CIA, and he has said that outing a CIA agent is treason.

LETTERMAN: It is treason, yes.

FRANKEN: And so, basically, what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed.

LETTERMAN: What? What? Really?

FRANKEN: Yeah. And I don't know how I feel about it because I'm basically against the death penalty, but they are going to be executed, it looks like.

[...]

LETTERMAN: The real crime is that there's an adult man walking around in the current administration named Scooter. I mean, we can agree on that, right?

FRANKEN: That, and -- but sooner or later he'll be executed, so -- and you worry about it because the president at some -- he said right away when [columnist Robert] Novak outed the CIA agent, Plame, said, "I want to get to the bottom of this." Well, now, Karl Rove is his right-hand man. Did he ask Karl? Did Karl lie to him? If so, we know now he should have fired Karl by now so that -- did Karl tell the truth to him? In that case, the president -- and I think, by the way, that we should never ever, ever, ever execute a sitting president.

LETTERMAN: It makes us look bad around the world, I think.

FRANKEN: It would. It would be heartbreaking, I think, and I think that we should have a constitutional amendment.

LETTERMAN: I see, yeah. Have we ever come close in the history to executing a seated president?

FRANKEN: No, this will be the closest.

LETTERMAN: This will be the closest, yeah.

FRANKEN: Unless we get that amendment passed now.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wzwriter (March 17, 2008 4:42 pm ET)
         

      Franken concluded of his Late Show remarks, "[T]he whole point of that was to show that outing a CIA agent is serious. That's what a satirist does."

      Someone needs to tell Kiran Chetrey that the whole point to responsible journalism is getting the facts right.  That's what a journalist does.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sueelldd (March 17, 2008 4:47 pm ET)
           
        Could not agree with you more Wzwriter, I hate to see CNN become MSNBC and FOX with partisanship and lies.  Franken did not say that. This is a man that is at a major disadvantage in this race as FOX hates him and will do more and more to discredit him as election time comes.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by BottleBlonde (March 17, 2008 8:42 pm ET)
             

          MSNBC is not in the same league as Fox.

          Why do you try to paint them with the same brush? They're not close to being the same disingenous and partisan as Fox is. Worse, Fox claims they're Fair and Balanced, so they're hypocrites too.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by RoberttheP (March 17, 2008 9:19 pm ET)
               
            Last time I looked, no one at FOX said that Chelsea Clinton was being whored out.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by BottleBlonde (March 17, 2008 10:26 pm ET)
                 

              Are you Sueeld? You only seem to pop up when she needs defending by a supposedly non-partisan person.

              You must be woefully ignorant if you think your comment about MSNBC and Chelsea Clinton being pimped out buttresses Sueeld's argument. It actually weakens your (her) argument!

              When someone (David Shuster) who works for MSNBC said that, he got in big time trouble. When someone from Fox makes an obnoxious argument, they usually get praised by their colleagues and don't get punished by their network. Both Shuster and Matthews apologized for their recent behavior.

              Fox and MSNBC are not in the same league at all. Fox has countless examples of really obnoxious behavior, and a culture at their network that is horrific. MSNBC has a few examples of bad behavior and doesn't have the same rotten culture. There's a foul stench from Fox. MSNBC only has sour whiffs every once in a while.

              Sueeld tries to equate the two networks in an effort to smear MSNBC. Fox deserves our scorn. MSNBC needs to work on some of their problems, but she's way off base with the false equivalency. So are you.

               

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Sueelldd (March 17, 2008 10:36 pm ET)
                   
                Get a life, just because another poster has similar agreements does not make him or her me.  Can you have a discussion without the smears? 
                Report Abuse
                • Author by BottleBlonde (March 18, 2008 11:57 am ET)
                     

                  So, you're saying it's a smear for me to assume that Bobthep is you? You're so bad that if someone is being compared to you, they're being smeared?

                  Also, it's funny that Bobthep came to your rescue, and now you come to his?

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Sueelldd (March 18, 2008 12:00 pm ET)
                       
                    I am not even go to start to play games, you remind me of someone in the past who was banned from here.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by Sueelldd (March 17, 2008 10:35 pm ET)
               
            I would agree, FOX history is worse, from helping the propaganda regarding the war and back to the 2000 election. FOX is also taken a leading role in Obama bashing. MSNBC however has had a history of hate (Savage and Imus) and Hillary bashing (Matthews). 
            Report Abuse
            • Author by shoes89 (March 18, 2008 10:46 am ET)
                 

              Please!

              Al Franken got caught lying red-handed! Franken said, "No. I didn't even say that in a joking manner." That's simply a flat-out LIE.

              Al Franken lies, and Chetry is the wrong one?? Please!

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Sueelldd (March 18, 2008 12:00 pm ET)
                   
                Al franken did not lie DumbA**. 
                Report Abuse
              • Author by wzwriter (March 18, 2008 12:26 pm ET)
                   

                I followed your link and got this:

                Error 404: Page Not Found

                We're sorry, but the page you requested cannot be found.

                Report Abuse
      • Author by carlileb5935 (March 17, 2008 7:26 pm ET)
           

        Actually, I think the problem with these people is more fundamental:

        They are stupid. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 4:49 pm ET)
         
      Rich.  MMFA rushes to the defense of Al Franken who says he is a satirist, but if he were a rightwing talk show host or a rightwinger period, their satire and humor wouldn't be used so easily as an excuse.  Too funny......
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Uncle Walt (March 17, 2008 4:55 pm ET)
           
        ...rightwingers do not typically use or understand satire... not that there is anything wrong with that... some of my best friends are rightwingers... and I do not "advocate" that they be executed, to the best of my knowledge...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by august west (March 18, 2008 3:27 pm ET)
             

          "...rightwingers do not typically use or understand satire..."

          The Foxnoise 1/2 Hour Newshour show was clear evidence of that.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by WildcatProgressive (March 17, 2008 5:04 pm ET)
           
        Is this a variation of the never-tiresome, "Why is this here?"  You know, "If this were a Republican/conservative, blah, blah, blah."  While I normally like your posts, and think you often make solid points, Tommy, you do understand that this is a website dedicated to finding and pointing out CONSERVATIVE misinformation, right?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by SFnomad (March 17, 2008 5:07 pm ET)
             
          The frequency with which we have to remind some people of that, I'd have to say the answer is no.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wzwriter (March 18, 2008 7:40 am ET)
               

            The frequency with which we have to remind some people of that, I'd have to say the answer is no.

            It kinda suports my thery that conservatism is a genetic disorder, seeing as it runs in families....

            Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:09 pm ET)
             

          Well, my little ole' suggestion then would be to leave it alone, instead of shining a light on the double standard that obviously exists where satire is concerned.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by solonswine (March 17, 2008 5:15 pm ET)
               

            Excellent point, Tommy. Here's MMFA shoring up Franken's "humor" and "satire", but if it comes to Glenn Beck asking Pastor Hagee if Obama is the anti-christ while containing laughter, they jump on him like Ted Kennedy on a jelly donut.

            What I don't understand is that if Al Franken is so vehemently opposed to the death penalty, then why does he say "I don't know how I feel about it". Come on, Al, you're against the death penalty. You SHOULD KNOW ALREADY how you feel about it. But obviously the execution of Conservative political figures makes him struggle with his beliefs. What a fake.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by eweston8542983 (March 17, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
                 

              Having serious thoughts about someones mortality equals fake.....How? We should all know instanatly weather the person in front of us deserves to live or die? 

              Fill in the details so they can be fine sliced.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by solonswine (March 17, 2008 5:37 pm ET)
                   

                There should be no question in Al's mind at all. He is against the death penalty. Period. So if you're a rapist, drug trafficker, baby killer, murderer, it doesn't matter. No executions, period.

                But.......talk about the notion of executing a conservative? All of the sudden Al shifts gears to "I don't know how I feel about that".

                It's the same as all those wacko lefties who are against the death penalty who secretly (or not so secretly) pine for someone to put a bullet into GW's forehead (Randi Rhodes comes to mind).

                BTW, what is "instanatly weather"? Is that caused by global warming?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by dbeden4153 (March 17, 2008 5:47 pm ET)
                     

                  "basically" against the death penalty leaves room for argument.

                  And treason, still today, is punishable by death.

                  Rove, Libby, Novak and Armitage just better be glad they got away with it. 

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by mary59 (March 17, 2008 5:47 pm ET)
                     
                  Can't tell if you are being deliberately obtuse about Franken's remarks, but of course in any case you like to make sure that you work in your theme song
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by eweston8542983 (March 17, 2008 6:47 pm ET)
                     

                  Didn't have a dictionary with me.

                  Being against the death penalty doesn't mean you can't mention it. Being against the death penalty doesn't mean that if the law and the courts say death and your part of the process. You do your legal part. Changing the law is another part of the process. Few to perhaps no progressive looks for excuses to decide someones mortality. But if ya gotta legally and you can't change the system at that point, then you do your legal duty.No more and certainly no less.

                  Now back to Cruising for Misspellings, your showtime favorite. 

                  Randee didn't do the bit. the argument is old do we need to run through it again?

                   

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by progressive tribalist (March 20, 2008 12:47 am ET)
                     
                  You really need to get better at this stuff, conservative swine.

                  "But.......talk about the notion of executing a conservative? All of the sudden Al shifts gears to "I don't know how I feel about that"."

                  Sorry. You are wrong. We are, Franken was, talking about executing two honest to God traitors. Franken wasn't, we aren't, talking about some generic witless conservative such as yourself. The discussion has never been about innocent people of the sort you so ham -fistedly characterized in the broad, neutral terminology of the general conservative. Nah swine we're talking about a pair of dudes who have taken no responsibity, been held to no measure of accountibility for their crimes against the public.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by carlileb5935 (March 17, 2008 7:25 pm ET)
                 

              "Excellent point, Tommy. Here's MMFA shoring up Franken's "humor" and "satire", but if it comes to Glenn Beck asking Pastor Hagee if Obama is the anti-christ while containing laughter, they jump on him like Ted Kennedy on a jelly donut."

              Here's the difference. One's funny and pointed, and relevant to the topic at hand. 

              One isn't. 

              Report Abuse
            • Author by progressive tribalist (March 18, 2008 2:30 am ET)
                 
              "What I don't understand is that if Al Franken is so vehemently opposed to the death penalty, then why does he say "I don't know how I feel about it". Come on, Al, you're against the death penalty. You SHOULD KNOW ALREADY how you feel about it. But obviously the execution of Conservative political figures makes him struggle with his beliefs. What a fake." solonswine

              Now that, even though I have no use for a conservative swine like yourself, is a valid criticism. I can't stand a mealy mouthed Republican who talks like that and I sure as sh.. detest it out of a solid dude like Franken. But we also ain't talkin about generic conservative political figures, as you so antiseptically described the two headed Chenybush monster. No. We're talkin' about honest to God criminals. Sidewinders who betrayed our public trust and jeopardized the longterm safety of the United States by taking down the wrong guy while showing zero concern about the real 9/11 killer. Treason. Serious.

              As he said in the interview, a satirist points out what is actually serious. He didn't take the I'm only joking cop out like so many sweaty palmed conservative talkers.

              Yep, he should live his values and not leave himself exposed like that not knowing how he feels but damn, the bigger picture of treason is a very serious matter.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by kromecom48 (March 17, 2008 5:20 pm ET)
               
            Tommy you're missing the point. Franken is a current and former paid comedian and satirist that CHOSE to transition into politics. Much as Reagan was a former actor AND UNIONIST, WHO CHOSE to transition into politics and become anti-union. Tell me who the right wing comedians and satirists are?  Limbaugh? He would chafe at the label and as far as know as never been a member of SAG-AFTRA or any writers guild. By his own admission he has a ghost writer for his books so he can't even claim that. He, Coulter, et al, are pure partisan pundits NOT satirists since that takes some level of intellect. Republicans are philistines for the most part and eschew the arts and artististic pursuits. That's just a fact sir.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
                 
              Well, considering MMFA hall-of-famer Keith Olbermann constantly refers to Rush Limbaugh as a "comedian", perhaps you should direct your question to him.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by solonswine (March 17, 2008 5:31 pm ET)
                   
                Nice one!! Tommy - 159, Lefties - 0.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by wzwriter (March 17, 2008 5:45 pm ET)
                     

                  Nice one!! Tommy - 159, Lefties - 0.

                  I figured that Tommy was at around minus 159 by now....

                  Which is equal to Solonswine's IQ.  :-)

                  Report Abuse
              • Author by dbeden4153 (March 17, 2008 5:32 pm ET)
                   
                faulty logic Tommy, you know better than that.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:36 pm ET)
                     
                  Faulty?  All I did was respond to the comedian question. 
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by dbeden4153 (March 17, 2008 5:38 pm ET)
                       
                    Because KO labels Limbaugh a comedian, that makes him a comedian?  That's the gist of what you said, and it doesn't follow logical direction.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:42 pm ET)
                         
                      Did I say something that was not true?  No, Kromecom implied that Limbaugh was not a comedian. I simply pointed out a very prominent and popular liberal on this very site, that is quoted often and much revered, Olbermann, who calls Rush that very thing.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by dbeden4153 (March 17, 2008 5:48 pm ET)
                           

                        Right, and we all know he does it to try to marginalize Limbaugh.  He's not saying he's actually a comedian...

                        again with that satire thing.  You really do have trouble with it, don't you? 

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:52 pm ET)
                             

                          Save your condescending lecture DB, if you can't even accept that much satire is in the eye of the beholder, and the laughter or disguist that identical satire can illicit in different people, with different perspectives, is a reality, then that is too bad. 

                          If your partisanship blinds you to even that elementary fact,  I'd say you need to bone up on word definitions. 

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by foghornleghorn (March 17, 2008 6:47 pm ET)
                               

                             I simply pointed out a very prominent and popular liberal on this very site, that is quoted often and much revered, Olbermann, who calls Rush that very thing.

                            You do need a Comedy 101 refresher.  What Olbermann was doing was satire.  Because most of what comes out of Limbaugh's mouth is laughable, he is in some ways a "comedian" despite trying to be serious.

                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 5:57 pm ET)
                           
                        So then by that logic if I refer to YOU as a molestor of small furry animals does that MAKE you one? Or perhaps there is a POINT there. Limbaugh is supposed to be a commentator. Franken has won FIVE EMMYS as a comedy writer. None of this is relevant since the POINT isnt about defending Franken from what he said. If you want to take him to task I think you have a valid point, its about the FALSE CITATION. Franken did NOT say what he was alleged to have said. THAT is what is false and it shouldnt be let go. The LEAST we can expect from journalists is that they do NOT mischaracterize what someone said its dishonest and they OUGHT to be called on it.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 17, 2008 7:22 pm ET)
                             
                          Hey, I read on the Internets that Tommy is a molester of small furry animals. Therefore it must be true.
                          Report Abuse
          • Author by SFnomad (March 17, 2008 5:20 pm ET)
               
            There is no "double standard" ... but there are people here that are either being willfully ignornat of MMFAs mission statement or they're just about as dense as anyone I've ever met
            Report Abuse
            • Author by BottleBlonde (March 17, 2008 8:45 pm ET)
                 

              Willfully ignorant or woefully ignorant?

              Is one more preferable than the other?

              Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (March 17, 2008 5:12 pm ET)
           

        Rich.  MMFA rushes to the defense of Al Franken who says he is a satirist

        The point of the article is that Chetry lied when she claimed Franken said that Rove and Libby should be executed and then lied again about saying it.  Franken really didn't need to add the satirist part.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Governor (March 17, 2008 5:13 pm ET)
             
          Exactly.  But someone's got a "WITH" quota he's gotta fill.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:15 pm ET)
             
          If Glenn Beck, or Bill O'Reilly had said the exact same thing, as they have with similar satirical jabs in the past, it would be highlighted here for the exact opposite reason - for liberals to gasp and say "Ahhhhh".  The nerve.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 5:20 pm ET)
               
            And if they said the same thing and were then MISQUOTED by a third journalist THAT would be covered here too. Not a double standard. The point of this article ISNT Franken. Its Franken being mischaracterized. Why is this so hard to understand?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by loonz (March 17, 2008 5:23 pm ET)
               
            You still don't get it.  Chetry lied when she claimed that Franken said Rove and Libby should be executed.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:25 pm ET)
                 
              Pffft.  That's about as weak a defense and about as pathetic a rationalization as I have heard here in some time, you get the thumbs up Solon.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by SFnomad (March 17, 2008 5:26 pm ET)
                   
                Nice job derailing another thread with your WITH bs.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:28 pm ET)
                     
                  Well, you have at least three trips on the derail train, care to keep riding or would you like to jump off?  Please....
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by SFnomad (March 17, 2008 5:35 pm ET)
                       
                    It's really simple, she lied, she was called all it, then she lied again.  Franken did not say they should be executed.  No matter how you want to spin it, he didn't say that.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by loonz (March 17, 2008 5:28 pm ET)
                   
                What are you talking about?  Chetry lied and when called out on it by Franken, she lied again.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:31 pm ET)
                     

                  The point is Franken is using satire as an excuse for what he said, maybe he was, I don't really care......the point is when rightwingers use satire and humor they are excoriated and trounced on by liberals here, some say it wasn't humor at all, others say it's typical rightwing mean-spiritedness and has no place in the discourse.

                  If you can't see the hypocrisy in this instance, I can't make it any clearer for you.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by loonz (March 17, 2008 5:35 pm ET)
                       

                    The point is Franken is using satire as an excuse for what he said, maybe he was, I don't really care

                    The point is the reporter lied.  If she had simply stated what Franken said on Letterman's show, this article wouldn't be here.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:39 pm ET)
                         

                      She was questioning what Franken said, he blamed it on satire now that he's a serious politician.......and if you want to be picky, she didn't actually use the word "advocate".

                      Point is she was getting clarification on what Franken meant and what he said, he said it was all under the guise of satire......which is normally not so appetizing here, unless it's uttered by a liberal.

                      Not to worry, I  G E T  I T......

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by loonz (March 17, 2008 5:47 pm ET)
                           

                        She was questioning what Franken said, he blamed it on satire now that he's a serious politician

                        She was questioning her own made up thought about what he said and he called her out on it.  The satire part is irrelevant to her lying about what he said.

                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by loonz (March 17, 2008 5:50 pm ET)
                           

                        she didn't actually use the word "advocate".

                        I see no difference between "they should be executed" and "advocate their execution".

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by HughG (March 17, 2008 8:08 pm ET)
                             

                          Tommy: she didn't actually use the word "advocate".

                          Loonz: I see no difference between "they should be executed" and "advocate their execution".

                          You are correct, Sir. He said "What you said was that I advocated the execution of Karl" (italics mine). Therefore, he wasn't purporting to quote her. He was describing the meaning of what she'd been saying.

                          Tommy's gotta be desperate, if he's relying on this sort of nitpicking.

                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by Governor (March 17, 2008 5:36 pm ET)
                       
                    But Franken made no excuse.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by dbeden4153 (March 17, 2008 5:37 pm ET)
                       

                    No Tommy, that's not the point of this thread at all.  It's not about Franken, it's about Chetry.  She is the one who mis-characterized someone.

                    And did you read what Franken actually said?  He said, and I quote, "George H.W. Bush, the president's father, was the head of the CIA, and he has said that outing a CIA agent is treason. ... And so, basically, what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed."

                    Penalty for treason? last time I checked, still death.   

                     

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 6:09 pm ET)
                       
                    No that ISNT the point, that is what YOU want the point to be for YOUR partisan reasons. THIS site is about media misinformation and she supplied some and got called on it THAT is the point it is also known as the TOPIC. The topic is not subject to change for the convienience of whatever argument YOU WANT TO MAKE.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 6:09 pm ET)
                       
                    No that ISNT the point, that is what YOU want the point to be for YOUR partisan reasons. THIS site is about media misinformation and she supplied some and got called on it THAT is the point it is also known as the TOPIC. The topic is not subject to change for the convienience of whatever argument YOU WANT TO MAKE.
                    Report Abuse
              • Author by Governor (March 17, 2008 5:28 pm ET)
                   
                Did you forget your Water Wings today?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 6:00 pm ET)
                   
                No it isnt. It is in fact THE CRUX OF THE BUSCUIT. It really isnt my fault you arent bright enough to follow simple logic. The point of this article ISNT that Franken is above reproach its that HE WAS MISREPRESENTED. Find a reasonably bright six year old to explain the very simple concept to you.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 6:11 pm ET)
                     
                  I am sorry tommy, this post was much more hostile than it deserved I misread one of your posts as a reply to mine when it wasnt, my appologies.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by pete592 (March 17, 2008 5:30 pm ET)
               

            After all, aren't "satirical jabs" what we watch media sources like Headline News and Fox News for?  Later, after we've all tanked up on satire, we can tune in to late night comedy to get insight on the important issues.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:34 pm ET)
                 

              Politics/information/news/satire - it's all mixed up very nicely these days, you know it is........just look at Comedy Central, they do both serious and satire all the time, sometimes in the same segment.  The lines are not nearly as distinct as they used to be. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (March 17, 2008 6:01 pm ET)
                   

                "Comedy Central, they do both serious and satire all the time, sometimes in the same segment."

                You've stumbled upon a fundamental basic of political satire: without a headline, no one is going to get the punchline.

                There may yet be hope for the comedy-challenged right.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 6:07 pm ET)
                     

                  I would say the comedy-devoid left is aching for more funny political satirists on their side, and now they are about to lose Al Franken to serious politics, that they are desperate to cling to whatever shred of wink,wink, nod, nod they can get.......hence the "spirited" defense of left wing satire on display here.

                  Don't take it out on me..... 

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 6:14 pm ET)
                       
                    Comedy devoid left. You are completly oblivious. The lefties here are hilarious. Lewis Black, Jon Stewart, Colbert virtually ANY standup comedian and you guys have WHO on your side? Dennis Miller? It is clearly the right that is comedy challenged.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by billie789 (March 17, 2008 6:49 pm ET)
                         

                      Comedy-devoid left? We're being baited.

                      Tommy, your Mom wants you to come upstairs and get ready for dinner!

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by solonswine (March 17, 2008 7:07 pm ET)
                         

                      Dennis Miller uses prose, historical reference, and large words in his comedic delivery. To the liberal, he is not funny. To an educated person, he is.

                      Stewart's show is a 30 minute fart joke.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by mary59 (March 17, 2008 7:30 pm ET)
                           
                        Gosh, he uses prose and large words. I don't know any of those things. Perhaps Dennis has a dictionary uphisarseoozle.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by juliajayne (March 17, 2008 7:31 pm ET)
                           
                        Yeah, those Sylvia Plath references are sooooo funny. Btw it's clear you've never watched "the Daily Show". But you parroted a line from BillO's show.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 17, 2008 7:33 pm ET)
                           
                        Large words are funny.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by juliajayne (March 17, 2008 7:51 pm ET)
                             
                          Oh, you're just being comically supercilious.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by mescal (March 17, 2008 8:23 pm ET)
                               
                            Indubitably.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 17, 2008 11:53 pm ET)
                                 
                              Har! those big words make me laugh. That's because I'm an educated person. No, wait, I mean a pretentious pseudo-intellectual who is too dazzled by a little thesaurus and history book digging to notice the complete lack of substance or humor.
                              Report Abuse
                      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 17, 2008 9:46 pm ET)
                           
                        Dennis Miller hasn't been funny since Rick Overton quit as his head writer. Miller never understood the references that were written for him, and it always showed.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by solon (March 18, 2008 12:12 am ET)
                           

                        He uses big words and obscure references to fool morons like you into THINKING he MIGHT be funny. Since people as ignorant as you KNOW how stupid you are you laugh just in CASE it was funny. People like me that GET most of those references still dont think he is funny. When I come down with Alzhiemers and have only TWICE your IQ I will commit supuku in shame.

                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by pete592 (March 17, 2008 7:09 pm ET)
                       

                    "I would say the comedy-devoid left is aching for more funny political satirists on their side, and now they are about to lose Al Franken to serious politics, that they are desperate to cling to whatever shred of wink,wink, nod, nod they can get"

                    Desperate???  LMAO.  What a giant CROCK.

                    The comedy-prodigal left is mourning the loss of Al so that he can devote himself to unseating a status-quo Republican.  Where we will we ever get our laughs now that he's gone?

                    Your comebacks have really been lacking lately. 

                     

                     

                    Report Abuse
      • Author by iowalib (March 17, 2008 5:15 pm ET)
           

        Tommy, You're way off the mark here.  

        I saw Al's appearance on Letterman. I am guessing you didn't, else you would not be wondering why MMFA came to Al's defense. And there is no comparison to the right wing's usual attempt at humor. Here are the ways it contrasts with right wing humor: (I'm thinking Rush, Coulter, Beck, et al)

        1. It was not mean-spirited 

        2. It was perceptive

        3. It was funny.

         

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:17 pm ET)
             

          It was not mean-spirited.  It was perceptive.  It was funny.

          Gee, I would guess many of Rush's fans would say the exact same thing, and feel the exact same way.

          It is in the eye of the beholder.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 5:22 pm ET)
               
            Sure in the same way fat, balding,  middle aged men still think they are attractive. Its called denial.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:28 pm ET)
                 
              I still think you're quite attractive.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by solonswine (March 17, 2008 5:43 pm ET)
                   
                Now THAT'S funny!!
                Report Abuse
              • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 6:15 pm ET)
                   
                My wife thinks so but I am 6ft tall and have hair down well past my shoulders. Any lion would be proud to have my hair.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 17, 2008 6:45 pm ET)
                     
                  Solon, are you Fabio? I won't tell anybody.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by juliajayne (March 17, 2008 6:57 pm ET)
                       

                    Solon is looking so good

                    Better than one fine liberal should

                    His posts are spot on

                    He eviscerates cons

                    SS would be him if he could

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pete592 (March 17, 2008 7:28 pm ET)
                         
                      OMG Julia!  You saw that line and felt another one coming on??  LMAO!!
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by juliajayne (March 17, 2008 7:42 pm ET)
                           

                        Mary reminded me it's St. Patrick's day.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by juliajayne (March 17, 2008 8:19 pm ET)
                             
                          And SS, Solo swine was giving Solon a hard time as usual. I do hope that at least part of your arse is still there, though   :-)
                          Report Abuse
          • Author by dbeden4153 (March 17, 2008 5:31 pm ET)
               

            "funny" is subjective.  I'll give you that.  But Franken is a known satirist.  When people read his books, they understand that that is where he is coming from, and take his writings with a grain of salt.

            Can you say the same for O'Reilly?  Does he classify himself as a satirist?  Does anyone classify him that way?

            Or Limbaugh...isn't he the self-described "America's Anchorman"?  Doesn't he, therefore, hold himself up to be some arbiter of truth? 

            If he's just being satirical, and everyone understands that, then why is he pushing people out in droves to vote for Hillary to keep the Democratic Primary going? 

            And if he's a satirist, then all these people who listen to him and take everything he says at his word are being duped into believing that he's on their side, and that he speaks the truth.  To me, that's even more of a cause to show them for what they are.

            Sorry, but the argument rings hollow.

             

            Report Abuse
            • Author by paleocon (March 17, 2008 6:06 pm ET)
                 

              Or Limbaugh...isn't he the self-described "America's Anchorman"?  Doesn't he, therefore, hold himself up to be some arbiter of truth?

              yes, and the golden eib microphone is made of pure gold and the attila the hun chair was actually used by attila himself and he is, like it or not, 'the man who runs america'  it is all true. 

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 18, 2008 1:07 am ET)
                   
                Paleocon, your sarcasm is implying that Rush is a liar. Is that what you were shooting for?
                Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (March 17, 2008 5:43 pm ET)
           
        Tommy - seeing as you have a problem with virtually everything posted on this site, why do you even come to MMFA at all?????
        Report Abuse
      • Author by CB-ohio (March 17, 2008 5:51 pm ET)
           

        Republican satirists:

        "I don't like this person, so I hope someone kills him!"

        Democratic satirists:

        "Doing this event is the definition of treason, and the penalty for treason is execution."

        I don't know, I figure that with Franken, he's saying that Bush's father defined an event as treason, and that's precisely what Rove and Libby did. What so-called "comics" on the right do is not like someone's politics or the letter after their name that denotes the political affiliation, then think it's funny to say that person should die.

        To me, apples and oranges. But don't let logic get in your way, Tommy. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 5:57 pm ET)
             

          What's even more fruity is the way you liberals want to break it down piece by piece and explain it, as if I didn't get it......well, I got it.

          The point is Franken calls it satire and it's all fine with you here because it fits into your ideological dislike for the satirized targets of Franken, however when satire is aimed at someone you like, and used by someone you don't, it's not satire at all, but an unfunny mean-spirited smear........if you all can't acknowledge that, don't stomp your feet and try to explain satire to me, it ain't workin' 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (March 17, 2008 6:11 pm ET)
               
            Can someone cancel the free buffet?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by juliajayne (March 17, 2008 6:29 pm ET)
                 

              Vitamin deficient on the cons boards I would guess. And after reading Coulter's column, he's absolutely famished.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (March 17, 2008 6:32 pm ET)
                 
              Nice one Mary!  Credit is due.......
              Report Abuse
          • Author by billie789 (March 17, 2008 7:00 pm ET)
               

            Tommy- 

            I can suggest several sites where Republican apologists who are actually fairly nice people congregate, discuss politics, economics, etc. and everyone willo agree with you about anything as long as it;s Republican hogwash.

            Instead of baiting and trolling this site, you could be at peace with others of your ilk and 'tude. Honestly, Tommy, I know a lot of sensible, caring Republicans who just can't explain why their thinking is so very, very pigheaded, defensive and, really, angry about the way things have gone for them these past 7 1/2 years.

            In fact, I'm surprised that when you ready yourself for comment here, you don't just charge in and scream "Bill Clinton!" as an answer to all Republican incompetence.

            You seem like a thoughtful and intelligent person and I join the growing voices here that wonder why you insist on trying to shine a light where so much clear light already exists.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by progressive tribalist (March 19, 2008 2:08 am ET)
               
            Your cynicism is so very mundane, tommy. Where's that spark? I think your fading lad. It won't be long now, friend.

            "The point is Franken calls it satire and it's all fine with you here because it fits into your ideological dislike for the satirized targets of Franken, however when satire is aimed at someone you like, and used by someone you don't, it's not satire at all, but an unfunny mean-spirited smear........if you all can't acknowledge that, don't stomp your feet and try to explain satire to me, it ain't workin' "

            What the ell is that? It is not our fault the scrawling whispers that deafen your most quiet moments belong to nothing other than your own torpid mind.

            Ya lack vigor, vigor is what ya lack, tommy the conservative. What principles guide your assumptions on the way the world should work? Does it look like some big tuff, punch drunk, unenlightened zealot daddy?

            Does it manifest itself as the kind of a guy who would teach his own son how to swim by throwing him off the diving board?

            You know it does because that is exactly what cons mean with that you're on your own, individual responsibility jag. They mean there's the water, boy ya better learn to swim quick jerk. because I ain't gonna be here for some can't fix his own damn problems, drowning in the pool no account leech son of mine.

            No thanks that's no way to grow a healthy country. You gotta learn to swim together brother.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (March 17, 2008 6:41 pm ET)
           

        Rich.  MMFA rushes to the defense of Al Franken who says he is a satirist, but if he were a rightwing talk show host or a rightwinger period, their satire and humor wouldn't be used so easily as an excuse.  Too funny......

        Tommy, what's funny to me is that you have absolutely no sense of humor.  Name me one, just ONE right-winger "satirist/comedian" that is even a tad bit funny.

        Not Dennis Miller.  Not PJ O'Rourke (he should retire for good after his last appearance on Bill Maher.  Not any of the Fox & Fools morning show idiots.  Not Coulter, Limbaugh, Beck, or any of the other hateful talking heads who you endlessly defend by saying they are just "telling a joke".

        Way too funny.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HughG (March 17, 2008 8:19 pm ET)
             
          Sometimes PJ O'Rourke is funny. He does a good job on NPR Radio's Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Goodfella57 (March 18, 2008 11:43 am ET)
             

          Foghorn,

          You are wrong...Dennis Miller is funny - there is no dispute. If you don't think so - it is YOUR sense of humor that needs work.

          Other funny conservatives:Norm MacDonald, Darrell Hammond, Dana Carvey, Don Rickles,  

          Also, have you seen this from David Mamet in Village Voice? 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 18, 2008 12:12 pm ET)
               
            I'll see you at the Rock the Vote with Don Rickles concert, Goodfella!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Goodfella57 (March 18, 2008 12:25 pm ET)
                 

              Oooo...You got me! Your so young and hip! and I'm so old. 

              Rock the Vote - just like the kids and their MTV! Yeah - that's you, isn't it Harlan...all hunched over your keyboard switching between your facebook page, YouTube and any number of inane liberal blogs. 

              You should get a girlfriend and go outside once and a while.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (March 19, 2008 12:47 pm ET)
               

            No, Dennis Miller WAS funny.  SNL days.  Since he drank the kool-aid, his career has fallen off the proverbial cliff.  All he can do is guest appearances on BO's nightly lie-fest.

            As for the other guys you mention, they don't do political humor.  So please, try again.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (March 17, 2008 4:50 pm ET)
         

      Al knows how the corporate media operate...

      He embarrassed her, and made her look like the little corporate stooge that she is.  Good job Al.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (March 17, 2008 5:01 pm ET)
         
      This is what passes for journalism these days. Misquote someone based upon talking points by the opposition, and endlessly try to "confront" the candidate with garbage questions and trivia.

      I second audit the vote: great job Al.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by spooky3 (March 18, 2008 12:41 am ET)
           
        I'll give Kiran a little credit, though. At least she discussed this misinformation in al's presence, (unintentionally) giving him the chance to set the record straight, even if she was unwilling or unable to "get it." Most reasonable people in her audience, and I do realize that this is a small number, would at least have the same chance. The standard MO with the misinformers is to do ply their trade when there is no one around who will or can challenge them. Then it's left to MMFA to undo their dirty work, much later, when the misinformer's audience isn't there to listen.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Governor (March 17, 2008 5:08 pm ET)
         
      CHETRY: "I didn't say advocated. I didn't say you advocated. That's not specifically how I misquoted you!!!"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (March 17, 2008 5:18 pm ET)
         
      And the world is my oyster. Except for the months with an R in them
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Marker (March 17, 2008 5:23 pm ET)
         
      Bad journalism, if you call what she does is journalism. Al came to our county convention this past weekend and he was well received. Go Franken, all Norm Coleman has been is a lap dog for bush.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 17, 2008 5:45 pm ET)
           
        Here's what nobody's mentioned; Franken's joke wasn't based on the violence or death threat (that's more of an Ann Coulter vein of humor), it was about hypocrisy, the tough talking theoretical patriotism and pursuit of justice of the Repubs versus their defense of treason in the reality-based universe.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fawltylogic (March 17, 2008 5:52 pm ET)
             

          EXACTLY! The joke wasn't that them being executed was funny, it was the double standard of the rightwingers. If they applied the standards of Bush's father, they should have Libby executed.

          If this had been Coulter or someone else and the roles reversed, the "joke" would have been "Since Libby committed treason, I hope someone sends him a letter with anthrax in it".

          And yes, this article is about the JOURNALIST here, not about Franken.

          Geez, why does this even need to be explained. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 17, 2008 6:08 pm ET)
               

            CBin Ohio explained it more concisely than I did (upthread), but apparently it does need to be explained, especially to those insisting most loudly that they "get it".

            Johnathon Swift and Jeffrey Dahmer - Double Standard?

            Then again, I spent several valuable minutes of my life trying to explain the usage of the adverb "well" to Factfinder the other day*, so satire might be a pretty tough one.Moonbats doin' the Lord's work. 

            *mission aborted- skull deemed impenetrable

            Report Abuse
            • Author by solon (March 17, 2008 6:18 pm ET)
                 
              Col. you got some chops dude.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 17, 2008 11:57 pm ET)
                   
                Thanks, Solon, love your work too. The only thing I don't like about you is that some days I think you have more fun here than I do.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne (March 17, 2008 6:00 pm ET)
             

          Hey Col. did you have to destroy Solo swine's argument so convincingly? You could have let the little feller save some face after all. You are just so heartless, man.

          BTW what David Letterman said about a grown man named Scooter running around the WH was funny. Hey, we have a grown man with the name....Oh never mind.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by paleocon (March 17, 2008 6:11 pm ET)
         
      you know what's fun? watching old snl's and counting the dead people- g. carlin
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (March 17, 2008 8:42 pm ET)
           
        Nah George C is still running arround. Did a book recently.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by paleocon (March 17, 2008 10:54 pm ET)
             
          it was a george carlin quote... should have used quotation marks - my bad.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by dazedandconfused26 (March 17, 2008 6:13 pm ET)
         

      'What I don't understand is that if Al Franken is so vehemently opposed to the death penalty, then why does he say "I don't know how I feel about it". Come on, Al, you're against the death penalty. You SHOULD KNOW ALREADY how you feel about it. But obviously the execution of Conservative political figures makes him struggle with his beliefs. What a fake.'

      solonswine

      "Again, I have no problem frying a murderer. In some cases I would even wave the cruel-and-unusual prohibition. But a dead man can't appeal."

      Al Franken, Rush Limabaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot And Other Observations. 

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solonswine (March 17, 2008 7:16 pm ET)
           
        Oh, was that book a political viewpoint publication, or was it "satire"? Now that he's a politician, do you think that he would vote "no" to abolishing the death penalty?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dazedandconfused26 (March 17, 2008 7:20 pm ET)
             
          I think he would vote no now or then or any other time. And he wouldn't be wrong.  Just like he said a dead man can't appeal, and there have been to many mistakes made and innocent men executed to continue to implement the death penalty.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dazedandconfused26 (March 17, 2008 7:21 pm ET)
               
            I missread your question. I mean he would vote yes to abolish the death penalty.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by spooky3 (March 17, 2008 7:56 pm ET)
         

      Tommy, do you not see the difference between saying someone:

      (a) SHOULD be executed and

      (b) WILL be executed (and this was said to satirize the insincerity of the Bush administration re: the Libby investigation)?

      If not, let's spell it out. (a) is "advocacy" of a position. (b) is predicting something will happen.

      Need an example? If I eat too much pizza, I WILL get fat-but I sure don't advocate eating too much pizza or getting fat.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HughG (March 17, 2008 8:25 pm ET)
           

        I advocate eating too much pizza, but I don't advocate getting fat.

        (I'd be great at proposing budgets, with huuuge tax cuts and off-budget trillion-dollar wars, for the Republican Party.)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nonbearing137 (March 17, 2008 8:03 pm ET)
         
      this is a test.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (March 17, 2008 8:46 pm ET)
         

      This is not a real test.

      I could be wrong.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nonbearing137 (March 17, 2008 8:50 pm ET)
           
        i was testing whether i could post without screening.  nothing more than that.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nonbearing137 (March 17, 2008 8:48 pm ET)
         
      what amendment, what is he talking about.  what a jerk.  I am sorry that I contributed to Coleman, he will crush this nincompoop.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Goodfella57 (March 17, 2008 9:42 pm ET)
         

      Franken: "I said, "David, you know what the penalty is for treason." And David asked me what was gonna happen to them. I said, "So I guess they might be executed, which I'm against."

      For him to say that he didn't advocate execution - "even as a joke" - is a complete LIE. Shame on MMfA for even suggesting otherwise.  

       

      Look - I have a sense of humor- I get it, alright? He has a right to say whatever he wants - but why go back and try to obfuscate what he clearly said? That just make him sound slimy. Kind of like "what the definition of "is" is. Remmember that? Another slimy character.    

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (March 17, 2008 9:54 pm ET)
           

        You might be an idiot.

        By saying that, I'm not advocating your idiocy, I'm merely stating a fact.

        Anything otherwise is a complete lie.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 18, 2008 12:04 am ET)
             
          Something might happen, and I'm against that thing happening. Yes! I get it now, I'm clearly in favor of that thing happening! Where do I register wingnut?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Goodfella57 (March 18, 2008 1:56 am ET)
             

          i don't get what your talking about. You call me a liar? A wingnut?

           

          I merely point out the truth. why are you so hostile and full of hate?  So much hate on the left...very disturbing

          Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (March 18, 2008 7:12 am ET)
               
            No you arent pointing out the truth. You are exposing the FACT that your reading comprehension is pathetic. As for this weeks hivemind assignment to talk about the hate on the left. Please YOUR side has Coulter, Savage, Limbaugh et al. You guys PERFECTED hate. Typical wingnut projection.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 18, 2008 12:24 am ET)
           
        Please tell me that was a joke. No one could be so dumb and operate a keyboard. He did NOT advocate anyone being executed. You would have to be a complete and utter moron to claim he did. YOU look REALLY stupid pretending he did or that MMFA was wrong. MMFA is NOT wrong. If you cant tell the difference here you are sad and need to go back to third grade.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (March 17, 2008 10:13 pm ET)
         

          If Franken were funny, he wouldn't be trying to find a political gig, he'd be telling jokes in  Las Vegas for real money.

          If Franken gets into the Senate, he can be Harry Reid's straight man. They are both about as funny as a tooth-ache.

           

           

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (March 17, 2008 10:26 pm ET)
           
        Harry Reid's straight man? Too weird.

        Al does all right. He certainly would be a big improvement over Coleman.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 18, 2008 12:07 am ET)
           

        Ed, you've made a common conservative mistake- you've judged somebody elses choice based on your view that nothing is more important than how much money you can horde before you die.

        Besides, politicians don't do too bad income-wise.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (March 18, 2008 12:27 am ET)
           
        Franken has won FIVE EMMYs for comedy writing. He co-wrote the hugely successful movie When a Man Loves a Woman. He doesnt NEED a political gig he wants one. IF you had an ACTUAL point or even the semblance of a cogent argument I suppose we would have seen it instead of this weak and frankly stupid attack on Franken.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Blue Dog (March 18, 2008 10:07 pm ET)
           
        "If Franken gets into the Senate, he can be Harry Reid's straight man. "

        It would be better if franken was a republican. They need more straight men.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by r2rich (March 17, 2008 11:54 pm ET)
         
      It doesn't surprise me that Kiran Chetry a left-over from Fox news has her facts wrong and is a tool for the repuglican party tries to sandbag Franken in this interview.  Franken will make a Great Senator for Minnesota.  Norm Colman has been a rubber stamp for the Bush Conspirsy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (March 18, 2008 12:04 am ET)
         
      Rush Limbaugh makes a living on satire.  But he doesn't get a pass like Al Franken. God help us if this guy gets elected to the U.S. Senate.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (March 18, 2008 10:20 am ET)
           

        Rush Limbaugh is NOT a satirist - he proclaims to tell the truth (as he sees it).

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Cheney2012 (March 18, 2008 8:44 pm ET)
             

          Foghorn..have you ever listened to show or is what Media Matters transcribes all the info you get on Rush's show?

          It's all about satire and funnier in one day than Al Franken "has been" in his entire pathetic career

          Report Abuse
          • Author by foghornleghorn (March 19, 2008 12:52 pm ET)
               

            If you truly find Limbaugh to be "funny", then you have some serious issues.  You probably thought his mocking of Michael J. Fox and that 12 year old kid was hilarious.  You probably laugh histerically every time he utters his famous catch-phrase "femi-nazis". 

            It's scary that you don't see the harm that talking heads like Limbaugh have perpetrated on our society.  And to answer your question, no, I don't regularly listen to Limbaugh, but have heard enough to know he's not "funny".

            Report Abuse
    • Author by oneleft (March 18, 2008 8:17 am ET)
         

      Tommy, you do understand that this is a website dedicated to finding and pointing out CONSERVATIVE misinformation, right?

      WildcatProgressive


      Well, my little ole' suggestion then would be to leave it alone, instead of shining a light on the double standard that obviously exists where satire is concerned.

      - tommy

      Uh, you do understand that this is a website dedicated to...?

      There is no double standard, go to the right wing sites to hear the other side.  

      You do understand that this is a website dedicated to finding and POINTING OUT CONSERVATIVE misinformation?  You do understand that?  Yes? No?

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by robrob (March 18, 2008 4:24 pm ET)
         

      "And so, basically, what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed... Yeah. And I don't know how I feel about it because I'm basically against the death penalty, but they are going to be executed, it looks like."

      Fine example how the RWnuts have no sense of humor and can only take things out of context (even when provided with the full quote).

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.