Chetry falsely claimed Franken said Rove and Libby "should be executed for treason" -- then denied having claimed it
SUMMARY: Interviewing Al Franken on CNN's American Morning, Kiran Chetry falsely claimed that Al Franken, in a 2005 appearance on David Letterman's show, "said some things about Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, saying they should be executed for treason." In fact, as Franken noted, he had said that "George H.W. Bush, the president's father, was the head of the CIA, and he has said that outing a CIA agent is treason. ... And so, basically, what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed." Chetry then denied having said that Franken "advocated" executing Rove and Libby.
During an interview with Al Franken on the March 14 edition of CNN's American Morning, host Kiran Chetry falsely asserted to Franken, "You said some things about [former White House deputy chief of staff] Karl Rove and [former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney] Scooter Libby, saying they should be executed for treason." As the website Raw Story noted, Chetry was referring to an exchange Franken had with David Letterman on the October 21, 2005, edition of CBS' Late Show regarding Rove and Libby's roles in leaking the identity of former CIA operative Valerie Plame. However, during that interview, Franken did not assert that Rove and Libby "should be executed for treason." Rather, as Franken noted during his interview with Chetry, he asserted on the Late Show that "George H.W. Bush, the president's father, was the head of the CIA, and he has said that outing a CIA agent is treason," and then said, "what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed." Franken added, "I don't know how I feel about it because I'm basically against the death penalty, but they are going to be executed, it looks like."
In response to Chetry's claim that he "sa[id]" Rove and Libby "should be executed for treason," Franken stated, "I did not say that, Kiran," and later said, "I didn't even say that in a joking matter." After Franken described his original comments, Chetry asserted: "All I'm saying is, when you say things like that in the past ... and you're running, obviously those things come up." When Franken replied, "What you said was that I advocated the execution of Karl -- ," Chetry interrupted, and denied she made her earlier statement, saying, "I didn't say advocated. I didn't actually say you advocated [it]." Franken concluded of his Late Show remarks, "[T]he whole point of that was to show that outing a CIA agent is serious. That's what a satirist does."
From the March 14 edition of CNN's American Morning:
CHETRY: Now, you quoted something [Sen.] Norm Coleman [R-MN] said. You've said some controversial things in the past. You wrote a book called Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot. You said some things about --
FRANKEN: -- and Other Observations.
CHETRY: You said some things about Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, saying they should be executed for treason because they are --
FRANKEN: I did not say that, Kiran.
CHETRY: In a joking manner?
FRANKEN: Kiran.
CHETRY: In a satirical way?
FRANKEN: No. I didn't even say that in a joking manner.
CHETRY: What did you say?
FRANKEN: I was on David Letterman's show, and he asked me, this is, like, the day after it was revealed that they had outed -- participated in the outing of Valerie Plame, and he asked me what was gonna happen to him. And I said that President George H.W. Bush, before he was president, was director of the CIA. And George H.W. Bush said that outing a CIA agent was treason. I said, "David, you know what the penalty is for treason." And David asked me what was gonna happen to them. I said, "So I guess they might be executed, which I'm against. I don't know how -- I'm against the death penalty. And I'm afraid that [Vice President Dick] Cheney and [President George W.] Bush might be involved in some way, and so we should pass a constitutional amendment to ban the execution of a sitting president, because that would be very demoralizing to the American people." This was, you know, this is exactly what the Republican Party is doing. They take things out of --
CHETRY: Well, this is a CBS Late Show quote. OK, so the CBS Late Show quote, just so we're clear -- if you say, I mean, you were joking, you were joking around with David Letterman, he's a comedian, too -- is: "And so basically what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going be executed because outing a CIA agent is treason." And then you said -- you went on to say, "We should never, ever, ever execute a sitting president." All I'm saying is, when you say things like that in the past, and you're running --
FRANKEN: But no, but what you said was --
CHETRY: -- obviously those things come up.
FRANKEN: What you said was that I advocated the execution of Karl --
CHETRY: I didn't say advocated. I didn't say you advocated. I'm just talking about when you say things in the past that can be perceived as divisive, how do you then come together and say, "You know what? I can be a senator for everyone in the state"?
FRANKEN: Because people know the difference between being a satirist, and the whole point of that was to show that outing a CIA agent is serious. That's what a satirist does. A satirist points out what is actually serious, and anyone -- and, you know, the trick here is, they are going to be taking things out of context, and you're right. The Republican Party in Minnesota said that I advocated the execution of those guys. And I wasn't. And that's -- it was very clear to the Letterman audience and anyone who saw that, and, look, this is just ridiculous. We should be talking about foreclosures on homes. We should be talking about gas prices. We should be talking about loss of jobs, and that's what I'm going to do.
CHETRY: No, I agree.
FRANKEN: The reason they want -- the reason they want to do this kind of distraction is that Norm Coleman has such a terrible record on these things. So I'm not gonna let them do that, and then when they say that I advocated these things, they're only shooting themselves in the foot. They came out with this the day I announced. The day I announced, the first poll came out, said I was 22 points down to Norm Coleman. The last poll has me three points ahead of Norm Coleman. This doesn't work. And if they -- let them continue to do this. I'm gonna talk about the problems that face Minnesotans.
CHETRY: OK. And I just want to ask you this --
FRANKEN: I'm gonna talk about getting to universal health care.
CHETRY: Right.
FRANKEN: Go ahead.
From the October 21, 2005, edition of CBS' Late Show with David Letterman (Media Matters for America was unable to locate the full video of the segment; clips available here and here):
LETTERMAN: The feeling was that this report made the administration's decision to go to war look bad --
FRANKEN: Right. So they wanted to smear the guy who came back with the report, and so they outed his wife and said she sent him there, that she had -- and this is essentially -- you know, George H.W. Bush, the president's father, was the head of the CIA, and he has said that outing a CIA agent is treason.
LETTERMAN: It is treason, yes.
FRANKEN: And so, basically, what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed.
LETTERMAN: What? What? Really?
FRANKEN: Yeah. And I don't know how I feel about it because I'm basically against the death penalty, but they are going to be executed, it looks like.
[...]
LETTERMAN: The real crime is that there's an adult man walking around in the current administration named Scooter. I mean, we can agree on that, right?
FRANKEN: That, and -- but sooner or later he'll be executed, so -- and you worry about it because the president at some -- he said right away when [columnist Robert] Novak outed the CIA agent, Plame, said, "I want to get to the bottom of this." Well, now, Karl Rove is his right-hand man. Did he ask Karl? Did Karl lie to him? If so, we know now he should have fired Karl by now so that -- did Karl tell the truth to him? In that case, the president -- and I think, by the way, that we should never ever, ever, ever execute a sitting president.
LETTERMAN: It makes us look bad around the world, I think.
FRANKEN: It would. It would be heartbreaking, I think, and I think that we should have a constitutional amendment.
LETTERMAN: I see, yeah. Have we ever come close in the history to executing a seated president?
FRANKEN: No, this will be the closest.
LETTERMAN: This will be the closest, yeah.
FRANKEN: Unless we get that amendment passed now.















Franken concluded of his Late Show remarks, "[T]he whole point of that was to show that outing a CIA agent is serious. That's what a satirist does."
Someone needs to tell Kiran Chetrey that the whole point to responsible journalism is getting the facts right. That's what a journalist does.
MSNBC is not in the same league as Fox.
Why do you try to paint them with the same brush? They're not close to being the same disingenous and partisan as Fox is. Worse, Fox claims they're Fair and Balanced, so they're hypocrites too.
Are you Sueeld? You only seem to pop up when she needs defending by a supposedly non-partisan person.
You must be woefully ignorant if you think your comment about MSNBC and Chelsea Clinton being pimped out buttresses Sueeld's argument. It actually weakens your (her) argument!
When someone (David Shuster) who works for MSNBC said that, he got in big time trouble. When someone from Fox makes an obnoxious argument, they usually get praised by their colleagues and don't get punished by their network. Both Shuster and Matthews apologized for their recent behavior.
Fox and MSNBC are not in the same league at all. Fox has countless examples of really obnoxious behavior, and a culture at their network that is horrific. MSNBC has a few examples of bad behavior and doesn't have the same rotten culture. There's a foul stench from Fox. MSNBC only has sour whiffs every once in a while.
Sueeld tries to equate the two networks in an effort to smear MSNBC. Fox deserves our scorn. MSNBC needs to work on some of their problems, but she's way off base with the false equivalency. So are you.
So, you're saying it's a smear for me to assume that Bobthep is you? You're so bad that if someone is being compared to you, they're being smeared?
Also, it's funny that Bobthep came to your rescue, and now you come to his?
Please!
Al Franken got caught lying red-handed! Franken said, "No. I didn't even say that in a joking manner." That's simply a flat-out LIE.
Al Franken lies, and Chetry is the wrong one?? Please!
I followed your link and got this:
Error 404: Page Not Found
We're sorry, but the page you requested cannot be found.
Actually, I think the problem with these people is more fundamental:
They are stupid.
"...rightwingers do not typically use or understand satire..."
The Foxnoise 1/2 Hour Newshour show was clear evidence of that.
The frequency with which we have to remind some people of that, I'd have to say the answer is no.
It kinda suports my thery that conservatism is a genetic disorder, seeing as it runs in families....
Well, my little ole' suggestion then would be to leave it alone, instead of shining a light on the double standard that obviously exists where satire is concerned.
Excellent point, Tommy. Here's MMFA shoring up Franken's "humor" and "satire", but if it comes to Glenn Beck asking Pastor Hagee if Obama is the anti-christ while containing laughter, they jump on him like Ted Kennedy on a jelly donut.
What I don't understand is that if Al Franken is so vehemently opposed to the death penalty, then why does he say "I don't know how I feel about it". Come on, Al, you're against the death penalty. You SHOULD KNOW ALREADY how you feel about it. But obviously the execution of Conservative political figures makes him struggle with his beliefs. What a fake.
Having serious thoughts about someones mortality equals fake.....How? We should all know instanatly weather the person in front of us deserves to live or die?
Fill in the details so they can be fine sliced.
There should be no question in Al's mind at all. He is against the death penalty. Period. So if you're a rapist, drug trafficker, baby killer, murderer, it doesn't matter. No executions, period.
But.......talk about the notion of executing a conservative? All of the sudden Al shifts gears to "I don't know how I feel about that".
It's the same as all those wacko lefties who are against the death penalty who secretly (or not so secretly) pine for someone to put a bullet into GW's forehead (Randi Rhodes comes to mind).
BTW, what is "instanatly weather"? Is that caused by global warming?
"basically" against the death penalty leaves room for argument.
And treason, still today, is punishable by death.
Rove, Libby, Novak and Armitage just better be glad they got away with it.
Didn't have a dictionary with me.
Being against the death penalty doesn't mean you can't mention it. Being against the death penalty doesn't mean that if the law and the courts say death and your part of the process. You do your legal part. Changing the law is another part of the process. Few to perhaps no progressive looks for excuses to decide someones mortality. But if ya gotta legally and you can't change the system at that point, then you do your legal duty.No more and certainly no less.
Now back to Cruising for Misspellings, your showtime favorite.
Randee didn't do the bit. the argument is old do we need to run through it again?
"But.......talk about the notion of executing a conservative? All of the sudden Al shifts gears to "I don't know how I feel about that"."
Sorry. You are wrong. We are, Franken was, talking about executing two honest to God traitors. Franken wasn't, we aren't, talking about some generic witless conservative such as yourself. The discussion has never been about innocent people of the sort you so ham -fistedly characterized in the broad, neutral terminology of the general conservative. Nah swine we're talking about a pair of dudes who have taken no responsibity, been held to no measure of accountibility for their crimes against the public.
"Excellent point, Tommy. Here's MMFA shoring up Franken's "humor" and "satire", but if it comes to Glenn Beck asking Pastor Hagee if Obama is the anti-christ while containing laughter, they jump on him like Ted Kennedy on a jelly donut."
Here's the difference. One's funny and pointed, and relevant to the topic at hand.
One isn't.
Now that, even though I have no use for a conservative swine like yourself, is a valid criticism. I can't stand a mealy mouthed Republican who talks like that and I sure as sh.. detest it out of a solid dude like Franken. But we also ain't talkin about generic conservative political figures, as you so antiseptically described the two headed Chenybush monster. No. We're talkin' about honest to God criminals. Sidewinders who betrayed our public trust and jeopardized the longterm safety of the United States by taking down the wrong guy while showing zero concern about the real 9/11 killer. Treason. Serious.
As he said in the interview, a satirist points out what is actually serious. He didn't take the I'm only joking cop out like so many sweaty palmed conservative talkers.
Yep, he should live his values and not leave himself exposed like that not knowing how he feels but damn, the bigger picture of treason is a very serious matter.
Nice one!! Tommy - 159, Lefties - 0.
I figured that Tommy was at around minus 159 by now....
Which is equal to Solonswine's IQ. :-)
Eww, Tommy has a groupie.
Either that. or Tommy's also posting under an alias.....
Right, and we all know he does it to try to marginalize Limbaugh. He's not saying he's actually a comedian...
again with that satire thing. You really do have trouble with it, don't you?
Save your condescending lecture DB, if you can't even accept that much satire is in the eye of the beholder, and the laughter or disguist that identical satire can illicit in different people, with different perspectives, is a reality, then that is too bad.
If your partisanship blinds you to even that elementary fact, I'd say you need to bone up on word definitions.
I simply pointed out a very prominent and popular liberal on this very site, that is quoted often and much revered, Olbermann, who calls Rush that very thing.
You do need a Comedy 101 refresher. What Olbermann was doing was satire. Because most of what comes out of Limbaugh's mouth is laughable, he is in some ways a "comedian" despite trying to be serious.
I read that too.
Someone should call PETA about him.
Willfully ignorant or woefully ignorant?
Is one more preferable than the other?
Rich. MMFA rushes to the defense of Al Franken who says he is a satirist
The point of the article is that Chetry lied when she claimed Franken said that Rove and Libby should be executed and then lied again about saying it. Franken really didn't need to add the satirist part.
The point is Franken is using satire as an excuse for what he said, maybe he was, I don't really care......the point is when rightwingers use satire and humor they are excoriated and trounced on by liberals here, some say it wasn't humor at all, others say it's typical rightwing mean-spiritedness and has no place in the discourse.
If you can't see the hypocrisy in this instance, I can't make it any clearer for you.
The point is Franken is using satire as an excuse for what he said, maybe he was, I don't really care
The point is the reporter lied. If she had simply stated what Franken said on Letterman's show, this article wouldn't be here.
She was questioning what Franken said, he blamed it on satire now that he's a serious politician.......and if you want to be picky, she didn't actually use the word "advocate".
Point is she was getting clarification on what Franken meant and what he said, he said it was all under the guise of satire......which is normally not so appetizing here, unless it's uttered by a liberal.
Not to worry, I G E T I T......
She was questioning what Franken said, he blamed it on satire now that he's a serious politician
She was questioning her own made up thought about what he said and he called her out on it. The satire part is irrelevant to her lying about what he said.
she didn't actually use the word "advocate".
I see no difference between "they should be executed" and "advocate their execution".
Tommy: she didn't actually use the word "advocate".
Loonz: I see no difference between "they should be executed" and "advocate their execution".
You are correct, Sir. He said "What you said was that I advocated the execution of Karl" (italics mine). Therefore, he wasn't purporting to quote her. He was describing the meaning of what she'd been saying.
Tommy's gotta be desperate, if he's relying on this sort of nitpicking.
No Tommy, that's not the point of this thread at all. It's not about Franken, it's about Chetry. She is the one who mis-characterized someone.
And did you read what Franken actually said? He said, and I quote, "George H.W. Bush, the president's father, was the head of the CIA, and he has said that outing a CIA agent is treason. ... And so, basically, what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed."
Penalty for treason? last time I checked, still death.
After all, aren't "satirical jabs" what we watch media sources like Headline News and Fox News for? Later, after we've all tanked up on satire, we can tune in to late night comedy to get insight on the important issues.
Politics/information/news/satire - it's all mixed up very nicely these days, you know it is........just look at Comedy Central, they do both serious and satire all the time, sometimes in the same segment. The lines are not nearly as distinct as they used to be.
"Comedy Central, they do both serious and satire all the time, sometimes in the same segment."
You've stumbled upon a fundamental basic of political satire: without a headline, no one is going to get the punchline.
There may yet be hope for the comedy-challenged right.
I would say the comedy-devoid left is aching for more funny political satirists on their side, and now they are about to lose Al Franken to serious politics, that they are desperate to cling to whatever shred of wink,wink, nod, nod they can get.......hence the "spirited" defense of left wing satire on display here.
Don't take it out on me.....
Comedy-devoid left? We're being baited.
Tommy, your Mom wants you to come upstairs and get ready for dinner!
Dennis Miller uses prose, historical reference, and large words in his comedic delivery. To the liberal, he is not funny. To an educated person, he is.
Stewart's show is a 30 minute fart joke.
He uses big words and obscure references to fool morons like you into THINKING he MIGHT be funny. Since people as ignorant as you KNOW how stupid you are you laugh just in CASE it was funny. People like me that GET most of those references still dont think he is funny. When I come down with Alzhiemers and have only TWICE your IQ I will commit supuku in shame.
"I would say the comedy-devoid left is aching for more funny political satirists on their side, and now they are about to lose Al Franken to serious politics, that they are desperate to cling to whatever shred of wink,wink, nod, nod they can get"
Desperate??? LMAO. What a giant CROCK.
The comedy-prodigal left is mourning the loss of Al so that he can devote himself to unseating a status-quo Republican. Where we will we ever get our laughs now that he's gone?
Your comebacks have really been lacking lately.
Tommy, You're way off the mark here.
I saw Al's appearance on Letterman. I am guessing you didn't, else you would not be wondering why MMFA came to Al's defense. And there is no comparison to the right wing's usual attempt at humor. Here are the ways it contrasts with right wing humor: (I'm thinking Rush, Coulter, Beck, et al)
1. It was not mean-spirited
2. It was perceptive
3. It was funny.
It was not mean-spirited. It was perceptive. It was funny.
Gee, I would guess many of Rush's fans would say the exact same thing, and feel the exact same way.
It is in the eye of the beholder.
Solon is looking so good
Better than one fine liberal should
His posts are spot on
He eviscerates cons
SS would be him if he could
Mary reminded me it's St. Patrick's day.
"funny" is subjective. I'll give you that. But Franken is a known satirist. When people read his books, they understand that that is where he is coming from, and take his writings with a grain of salt.
Can you say the same for O'Reilly? Does he classify himself as a satirist? Does anyone classify him that way?
Or Limbaugh...isn't he the self-described "America's Anchorman"? Doesn't he, therefore, hold himself up to be some arbiter of truth?
If he's just being satirical, and everyone understands that, then why is he pushing people out in droves to vote for Hillary to keep the Democratic Primary going?
And if he's a satirist, then all these people who listen to him and take everything he says at his word are being duped into believing that he's on their side, and that he speaks the truth. To me, that's even more of a cause to show them for what they are.
Sorry, but the argument rings hollow.
Or Limbaugh...isn't he the self-described "America's Anchorman"? Doesn't he, therefore, hold himself up to be some arbiter of truth?
yes, and the golden eib microphone is made of pure gold and the attila the hun chair was actually used by attila himself and he is, like it or not, 'the man who runs america' it is all true.
Republican satirists:
"I don't like this person, so I hope someone kills him!"
Democratic satirists:
"Doing this event is the definition of treason, and the penalty for treason is execution."
I don't know, I figure that with Franken, he's saying that Bush's father defined an event as treason, and that's precisely what Rove and Libby did. What so-called "comics" on the right do is not like someone's politics or the letter after their name that denotes the political affiliation, then think it's funny to say that person should die.
To me, apples and oranges. But don't let logic get in your way, Tommy.
What's even more fruity is the way you liberals want to break it down piece by piece and explain it, as if I didn't get it......well, I got it.
The point is Franken calls it satire and it's all fine with you here because it fits into your ideological dislike for the satirized targets of Franken, however when satire is aimed at someone you like, and used by someone you don't, it's not satire at all, but an unfunny mean-spirited smear........if you all can't acknowledge that, don't stomp your feet and try to explain satire to me, it ain't workin'
Vitamin deficient on the cons boards I would guess. And after reading Coulter's column, he's absolutely famished.
Tommy-
I can suggest several sites where Republican apologists who are actually fairly nice people congregate, discuss politics, economics, etc. and everyone willo agree with you about anything as long as it;s Republican hogwash.
Instead of baiting and trolling this site, you could be at peace with others of your ilk and 'tude. Honestly, Tommy, I know a lot of sensible, caring Republicans who just can't explain why their thinking is so very, very pigheaded, defensive and, really, angry about the way things have gone for them these past 7 1/2 years.
In fact, I'm surprised that when you ready yourself for comment here, you don't just charge in and scream "Bill Clinton!" as an answer to all Republican incompetence.
You seem like a thoughtful and intelligent person and I join the growing voices here that wonder why you insist on trying to shine a light where so much clear light already exists.
"The point is Franken calls it satire and it's all fine with you here because it fits into your ideological dislike for the satirized targets of Franken, however when satire is aimed at someone you like, and used by someone you don't, it's not satire at all, but an unfunny mean-spirited smear........if you all can't acknowledge that, don't stomp your feet and try to explain satire to me, it ain't workin' "
What the ell is that? It is not our fault the scrawling whispers that deafen your most quiet moments belong to nothing other than your own torpid mind.
Ya lack vigor, vigor is what ya lack, tommy the conservative. What principles guide your assumptions on the way the world should work? Does it look like some big tuff, punch drunk, unenlightened zealot daddy?
Does it manifest itself as the kind of a guy who would teach his own son how to swim by throwing him off the diving board?
You know it does because that is exactly what cons mean with that you're on your own, individual responsibility jag. They mean there's the water, boy ya better learn to swim quick jerk. because I ain't gonna be here for some can't fix his own damn problems, drowning in the pool no account leech son of mine.
No thanks that's no way to grow a healthy country. You gotta learn to swim together brother.
Rich. MMFA rushes to the defense of Al Franken who says he is a satirist, but if he were a rightwing talk show host or a rightwinger period, their satire and humor wouldn't be used so easily as an excuse. Too funny......
Tommy, what's funny to me is that you have absolutely no sense of humor. Name me one, just ONE right-winger "satirist/comedian" that is even a tad bit funny.
Not Dennis Miller. Not PJ O'Rourke (he should retire for good after his last appearance on Bill Maher. Not any of the Fox & Fools morning show idiots. Not Coulter, Limbaugh, Beck, or any of the other hateful talking heads who you endlessly defend by saying they are just "telling a joke".
Way too funny.
Foghorn,
You are wrong...Dennis Miller is funny - there is no dispute. If you don't think so - it is YOUR sense of humor that needs work.
Other funny conservatives:Norm MacDonald, Darrell Hammond, Dana Carvey, Don Rickles,
Also, have you seen this from David Mamet in Village Voice?
Oooo...You got me! Your so young and hip! and I'm so old.
Rock the Vote - just like the kids and their MTV! Yeah - that's you, isn't it Harlan...all hunched over your keyboard switching between your facebook page, YouTube and any number of inane liberal blogs.
You should get a girlfriend and go outside once and a while.
No, Dennis Miller WAS funny. SNL days. Since he drank the kool-aid, his career has fallen off the proverbial cliff. All he can do is guest appearances on BO's nightly lie-fest.
As for the other guys you mention, they don't do political humor. So please, try again.
Al knows how the corporate media operate...
He embarrassed her, and made her look like the little corporate stooge that she is. Good job Al.
I second audit the vote: great job Al.
EXACTLY! The joke wasn't that them being executed was funny, it was the double standard of the rightwingers. If they applied the standards of Bush's father, they should have Libby executed.
If this had been Coulter or someone else and the roles reversed, the "joke" would have been "Since Libby committed treason, I hope someone sends him a letter with anthrax in it".
And yes, this article is about the JOURNALIST here, not about Franken.
Geez, why does this even need to be explained.
CBin Ohio explained it more concisely than I did (upthread), but apparently it does need to be explained, especially to those insisting most loudly that they "get it".
Johnathon Swift and Jeffrey Dahmer - Double Standard?
Then again, I spent several valuable minutes of my life trying to explain the usage of the adverb "well" to Factfinder the other day*, so satire might be a pretty tough one.Moonbats doin' the Lord's work.
*mission aborted- skull deemed impenetrable
Hey Col. did you have to destroy Solo swine's argument so convincingly? You could have let the little feller save some face after all. You are just so heartless, man.
BTW what David Letterman said about a grown man named Scooter running around the WH was funny. Hey, we have a grown man with the name....Oh never mind.
'What I don't understand is that if Al Franken is so vehemently opposed to the death penalty, then why does he say "I don't know how I feel about it". Come on, Al, you're against the death penalty. You SHOULD KNOW ALREADY how you feel about it. But obviously the execution of Conservative political figures makes him struggle with his beliefs. What a fake.'
solonswine
"Again, I have no problem frying a murderer. In some cases I would even wave the cruel-and-unusual prohibition. But a dead man can't appeal."
Al Franken, Rush Limabaugh Is A Big Fat Idiot And Other Observations.
Tommy, do you not see the difference between saying someone:
(a) SHOULD be executed and
(b) WILL be executed (and this was said to satirize the insincerity of the Bush administration re: the Libby investigation)?
If not, let's spell it out. (a) is "advocacy" of a position. (b) is predicting something will happen.
Need an example? If I eat too much pizza, I WILL get fat-but I sure don't advocate eating too much pizza or getting fat.
I advocate eating too much pizza, but I don't advocate getting fat.
(I'd be great at proposing budgets, with huuuge tax cuts and off-budget trillion-dollar wars, for the Republican Party.)
This is not a real test.
I could be wrong.
Franken: "I said, "David, you know what the penalty is for treason." And David asked me what was gonna happen to them. I said, "So I guess they might be executed, which I'm against."
For him to say that he didn't advocate execution - "even as a joke" - is a complete LIE. Shame on MMfA for even suggesting otherwise.
Look - I have a sense of humor- I get it, alright? He has a right to say whatever he wants - but why go back and try to obfuscate what he clearly said? That just make him sound slimy. Kind of like "what the definition of "is" is. Remmember that? Another slimy character.
You might be an idiot.
By saying that, I'm not advocating your idiocy, I'm merely stating a fact.
Anything otherwise is a complete lie.
i don't get what your talking about. You call me a liar? A wingnut?
I merely point out the truth. why are you so hostile and full of hate? So much hate on the left...very disturbing
If Franken were funny, he wouldn't be trying to find a political gig, he'd be telling jokes in Las Vegas for real money.
If Franken gets into the Senate, he can be Harry Reid's straight man. They are both about as funny as a tooth-ache.
Al does all right. He certainly would be a big improvement over Coleman.
Ed, you've made a common conservative mistake- you've judged somebody elses choice based on your view that nothing is more important than how much money you can horde before you die.
Besides, politicians don't do too bad income-wise.
It would be better if franken was a republican. They need more straight men.
Rush Limbaugh is NOT a satirist - he proclaims to tell the truth (as he sees it).
Foghorn..have you ever listened to show or is what Media Matters transcribes all the info you get on Rush's show?
It's all about satire and funnier in one day than Al Franken "has been" in his entire pathetic career
If you truly find Limbaugh to be "funny", then you have some serious issues. You probably thought his mocking of Michael J. Fox and that 12 year old kid was hilarious. You probably laugh histerically every time he utters his famous catch-phrase "femi-nazis".
It's scary that you don't see the harm that talking heads like Limbaugh have perpetrated on our society. And to answer your question, no, I don't regularly listen to Limbaugh, but have heard enough to know he's not "funny".
Tommy, you do understand that this is a website dedicated to finding and pointing out CONSERVATIVE misinformation, right?
WildcatProgressive
Well, my little ole' suggestion then would be to leave it alone, instead of shining a light on the double standard that obviously exists where satire is concerned.
- tommy
Uh, you do understand that this is a website dedicated to...?
There is no double standard, go to the right wing sites to hear the other side.
You do understand that this is a website dedicated to finding and POINTING OUT CONSERVATIVE misinformation? You do understand that? Yes? No?
"And so, basically, what it looks like is going to happen is that Libby and Karl Rove are going to be executed... Yeah. And I don't know how I feel about it because I'm basically against the death penalty, but they are going to be executed, it looks like."
Fine example how the RWnuts have no sense of humor and can only take things out of context (even when provided with the full quote).