About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

AP, CNN ignored McCain's "gaffe" on Al Qaeda

March 18, 2008 4:39 pm ET

SUMMARY: The Associated Press reported that Sen. John McCain voiced concern about Iran allegedly training "militants" and sending them to fight in Iraq, while CNN.com's Political Ticker reported that McCain had referred to "Iraqi extremists" being trained by Iran. In fact, McCain did not refer generically to "militants" or "Iraqi extremists"; he claimed that Iranian operatives are "taking al-Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back" to fight U.S. troops in Iraq, a misstatement that Washington Post reporters Cameron W. Barr and Michael D. Shear wrote "threatened to undermine McCain's argument that his decades of foreign policy experience make him the natural choice to lead a country at war with terrorists."

34 Comments

In a March 18 article, Associated Press writer Alfred de Montesquiou reported that Sen. John McCain "voiced concern that Tehran is bringing militants over the border into Iran for training before sending them back to fight U.S. troops in Iraq, and blamed Syria for allegedly continuing to 'expedite' a flow of foreign fighters." Similarly, in a March 18 post on CNN.com's Political Ticker blog, Emily Sherman wrote: "During a press conference in Amman, Jordan, the Arizona senator also said there is a continued concern that Iran may be training Iraqi extremists in Iran and then sending them back into Iraq." In fact, McCain did not refer generically to "militants" or "Iraqi extremists"; he claimed that Iranian operatives are "taking al-Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back," a misstatement that Washington Post reporters Cameron W. Barr and Michael D. Shear wrote "threatened to undermine McCain's argument that his decades of foreign policy experience make him the natural choice to lead a country at war with terrorists."

After Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who was with McCain, reportedly whispered something in his ear, McCain reportedly corrected himself, saying: "I'm sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not al-Qaeda." U.S. officials have reportedly claimed Iran is training Shiite militants; Al Qaeda is predominantly a Sunni organization.

Neither Montesquiou nor Sherman noted McCain's gaffe in their articles. Nor did they note that McCain reportedly corrected himself after Lieberman reportedly whispered something to him.

In a March 18 blog post, Politico senior political writer Jonathan Martin noted that McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said: "In a press conference today, John McCain misspoke and immediately corrected himself by stating that Iran is in fact supporting radical Islamic extremists in Iraq, not Al Qaeda -- as the transcript shows. Democrats have launched political attacks today because they know the American people have deep concerns about their candidates' judgment and readiness to lead as commander in chief."

The Post reported:

Speaking to reporters in Amman, the Jordanian capital, McCain said he and two Senate colleagues traveling with him continue to be concerned about Iranian operatives "taking al-Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back."

Pressed to elaborate, McCain said it was "common knowledge and has been reported in the media that al-Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran, that's well known. And it's unfortunate." A few moments later, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, standing just behind McCain, stepped forward and whispered in the presidential candidate's ear. McCain then said: "I'm sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not al-Qaeda."

The mistake threatened to undermine McCain's argument that his decades of foreign policy experience make him the natural choice to lead a country at war with terrorists. In recent days, McCain has repeatedly said his intimate knowledge of foreign policy make him the best equipped to answer a phone ringing in the White House late at night.

[...]

The U.S. has long asserted that elements of the Iranian security forces have been training and supplying weapons to Iraq's Shiite militias. Iran is an overwhelmingly Shiite country whose government has applauded the emergence of a Shiite-led government in Iraq but has denied supporting Shiite militias inside Iraq.

Al-Qaeda in Iraq is a predominantly Sunni militant group which is blamed for deadly mass killings of Shiites, along with attacks on U.S. forces. Some extremist Sunni consider Shiites to be heretics and therefore legitimate targets of attack.

The schism between Islam's Sunni and Shiite sects grew out of a dispute over the leadership of the faithful following the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 632 AD.

As the blog Think Progress noted, this was not the first time McCain has misidentified Iraqis who the U.S. government says are being trained in Iran. On the March 17 broadcast of Salem Radio Network's The Hugh Hewitt Show, McCain said, "As you know, there are al Qaeda operatives that are taken back into Iran, given training as leaders, and they're moving back into Iraq."

Video of McCain's assertion during the March 18 press conference that Iranians have been training Al Qaeda can be found here.

From the March 18 Associated Press article:

Sen. John McCain, the Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting, expressed fresh concern Tuesday about Iran's influence in Iraq and rising sway in Mideast.

McCain noted U.S. military officials recently discovered a cache of armor-piercing bombs in Iraq, and he hinted the explosives had been provided by Iran. U.S. officials have long been saying that Iran provides explosively formed penetrators, or EFPs to, Shiite militias in Iraq, although the Iranian government denies any role.

The U.S. military reported two such finds during the past week.

McCain also voiced concern that Tehran is bringing militants over the border into Iran for training before sending them back to fight U.S. troops in Iraq, and blamed Syria for allegedly continuing to "expedite" a flow of foreign fighters.

"We continue to be concerned about Iranian influence and assistance to Hezbollah as well as Iranian pursuit of nuclear weapons," McCain said.

He added that, if elected president, he would coordinate better with Europe to impose a "broad range of sanctions and punishments" on Tehran, to "convince them that their activities, particularly development of nuclear weapons, is not a beneficial goal to seek."

McCain declined to comment on whether he could back an eventual decision to strike Iran if Tehran doesn't cease its nuclear activities.

In response to a question about possible U.S. strikes against Tehran, McCain only said: "At the end of the day, we cannot afford having a nuclear armed Iran."

He warned that any hasty pullout from Iraq would be a mistake that would favor Iran and al-Qaida.

"We continue to be very concerned about the Iranian influence in Iraq and in the region," McCain said.

McCain ran into trouble last year when he joked about bombing Iran, giving a campaign audience in South Carolina a rendition of the opening lyrics of the Beach Boys rock classic "Barbara Ann," calling the tune "Bomb Iran" and changing the words to "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, anyway, ah ..."

McCain, who has linked his political future to U.S. success in Iraq, was in the wartorn country on Monday for meetings with Iraqi and U.S. diplomatic and military officials.

"We were very encouraged by the success of the surge and the reduction in U.S. casualties," McCain told reporters in Jordan, where he stopped on the next leg of a congressional visit that will also take him to Israel, Britain and France.

"We are succeeding, but we still have a long way to go," he warned. "Al-Qaida is on the run, they're not defeated."

A "major battle" remains to be fought to reclaim the northern Iraqi city of Mosul, he said, stating it was a success for the U.S. that Iraqi troops were now "taking the lead in that struggle" against al-Qaida.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (March 18, 2008 4:44 pm ET)
         
      Of course. Why would they waste valuable programming time to cover something so trivial? Oh, wait......
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 18, 2008 5:41 pm ET)
           

        Oh, come on.  Give the guy a break, he's just old!  I mean, it's not like he's running for...

        oh.  whoops.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (March 18, 2008 4:47 pm ET)
         

      Summary: The Associated Press reported that Sen. John McCain voiced concern about Iran allegedly training "militants" and sending them to fight in Iraq, while CNN.com's Political Ticker reported that McCain had referred to "Iraqi extremists" being trained by Iran. In fact, McCain did not refer generically to "militants" or "Iraqi extremists"; he claimed that Iranian operatives are "taking al-Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back" to fight U.S. troops in Iraq, a misstatement that Washington Post reporters Cameron W. Barr and Michael D. Shear wrote "threatened to undermine McCain's argument that his decades of foreign policy experience make him the natural choice to lead a country at war with terrorists."

      I'm taking this as a sign that John McCain is experiencing the initial stages of Alzheimer's disease.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (March 18, 2008 4:55 pm ET)
           
        I've seen him make gaffes like this before. I guess Republicans find that "charming".... and it fondly reminds them of President Numbnuts.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 18, 2008 9:57 pm ET)
             
          hey, he is now the Bush continuum, he is already friends with Rove and Cheney,. next is Rice, followed by Wolfowitz ad nauseum. perhaps even Jeb Bush has a chance for the vice- presidency.... that is all we need, anothe numbnuts marionette.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by ConstanceRifleII (March 18, 2008 4:57 pm ET)
           

        I can understand his frustration though.  When you advocate for something for sooo long, and it turns out to be a complete mess, you'd start trying to find the in-roads too.

        Of course, senility could be a factor too.  I think he's starting to get like Jon Arbuckle, but without Garfield, as in:

        http://garfieldminusgarfield.tumblr.com/page/5

        My favorite: the first one under Feb 24. 

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Clevenative (March 18, 2008 4:59 pm ET)
           
        My second "odds" question today... What are the odds we bomb, bomb, bomb Iran before Bush is out of office? I give it at least 5 to 1.;)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (March 18, 2008 5:03 pm ET)
             
          I think it depends on how successful they are at tearing down Obama with somebody else's words. If Obama survives this latest fabricated "scandal", they may need something big like a war with Iran to herd their sheeple to the polls.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wolf kotenberg (March 18, 2008 10:02 pm ET)
               
            That is exactly what is very possible. Some kind of " national emergenmcy followed by invoking the Patriot act to suspend the Cnstitution. that is a possibility that Thomas Jefferson warned the americans about and created the Second Amendment to protect ourselves from our own government going amuck.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by DTF (March 18, 2008 5:09 pm ET)
             
          Crud, I don't even want to see odds on that! :(
          Report Abuse
    • Author by edella1793 (March 18, 2008 5:03 pm ET)
         
      I saw this at Crooks and Liars this morning and was hoping MMfA would pick it up. That's some real nice reporting there from AP,CNN. How could you not note that McCain can't even get right who's fighting whom in Iraq? That's a pretty big gaffe. I guess the MM has to ignore those things because it doesn't jibe with the "national security", "military", "foreign policy" expert title that they're constantly shoving down our throats. Oh, wait..I forgot the MM is really liberal so now I don't know what to think.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DTF (March 18, 2008 5:08 pm ET)
         

      So exactly how long will al-Quaeda be "on the run"?  They've been on that run for a long time according to Pres. Bush...now Sen. McCain noted that they are running.  Are they Forrest Gump? :)

      Does the Senator not understand that there is no al-Quaeda presence in Iran due to the distinct differences in religious philosophy?  Just as there was no al-Quaeda presence in Iraq prior to the US invasion due to philosophical and political differences?

      And how can all of the reports detailing these differences go un-noticed?  Yeah, I get it, with all of the speeches one has to expect slips and gaffes, but this isn't the first time and the policies advocated by Sen. McCain seem to be based on these misconceptions.  IMHO anyway...:)

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Governor (March 18, 2008 5:12 pm ET)
         
      McCain should have no greater than a snowball’s chance in Hell at becoming our next President.  The fact that his presidential odds are better than the survival of said snowball in eternal fire, are troubling to say the least.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (March 18, 2008 5:34 pm ET)
           
        It's because the Democrats are in a circular firing squad, and the overpaid Media Bobbleheads keep shouting READY, AIM, FIRE!

        You also can't ignore Rush Limbaugh's campaign to get Republicans to cross over and vote for Hillary, just to drag it out longer. Apparently, these dittotrons are actually having an effect.

        As pointed out before..... they can't win on the issues.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Governor (March 18, 2008 5:40 pm ET)
             
          Bob Dole was a more viable candidate.  If the Dems screw this up, it'll have to be on purpose.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by DTF (March 18, 2008 5:44 pm ET)
             

          Finally, Nerzog, I get to chime in with the info I dug up...that is, if you're referring to the Texas primary.

          There were 20 counties in Texas that showed no votes at all in the Republican primary.  I dug around and tossed the info I found from the Texas Sec of State towards the fine staff at the Chicago Tribune.  Their main man in Texas responded that those 20 counties have no Republican committee, thus no Republican ballot, thus no Republican votes in primaries.  Some of those counties were pretty small jusding from the vote tallies in the primary and the 2004 Presidential election results, some were failry large.  In either case, no Republican votes does not equal any impact by Mr. Limbaugh.

          I kept trying to respond to your statements in earlier threads, but I was too noob and couldn't always get a quick response in before the threads died.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by dazedandconfused26 (March 18, 2008 5:26 pm ET)
         

      Bush is almost legally retarded, McCain is senile, and the republicans rip our candidates. Whatever.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (March 18, 2008 5:28 pm ET)
           

        Bush is almost legally retarded, McCain is senile, and the republicans rip our candidates. Whatever.

        It's wrong to refer to Bush as "retarded".  The mentally challenged can be trained to perform useful tasks - Bush cannot.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (March 18, 2008 5:46 pm ET)
         

      I guess it's all over now.  Who could overcome such a mistake?  Let's just pack it in!

      http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2327956420071224

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 18, 2008 5:53 pm ET)
           

        SinningConservative -

        You'd feel comfortable with a Commander-in-Chief who doesn't even know who America's enemies are?  We've had nearly 8 years of that, and look where it got us.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (March 18, 2008 9:43 pm ET)
             

          polish K,

          So this one comment supersedes all others about the Iraq war effort?  If that is true then my link above means Clinton should get out of the race and Obama the same, since he was surprised to hear of his pastor's comments from the pulpit!

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 19, 2008 2:20 pm ET)
               

            Sinner -

            The stakes are a little bit higher when you're at war.  If we had a commander-in-chief who knew what he was doing, maybe we wouldn't have been in this mess for the last 5 years.  And yet, you want to elect another commander-in-chief who has no idea who we're even supposed to be fighting.

            It's not just Bush's fault, it's people like you who are to blame for the current debacle in Iraq.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by nonbearing137 (March 18, 2008 5:59 pm ET)
         
      what a hullabaloo over nothing.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (March 18, 2008 6:33 pm ET)
           

        Mr. McCain, fresh from a visit to Iraq, misidentified some of the key players in the Iraq war. Mr. McCain said several times during his visit to Jordan – during a news conference and a radio interview — that he was concerned that Iran was training members of Al Qaeda in Iraq. “We continue to be concerned about Iranian taking Al Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back,’’ Mr. McCain said at the news conference. Asked about that statement, Mr. McCain said: “Well, it’s common knowledge and has been reported in the media that Al Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran. That’s well known. And it’s unfortunate.” Monday in an interview with the Hugh Hewitt Show, a radio program he called into from Amman. “As you know, there are Al Qaeda operatives that are taken back into Iran, given training as leaders, and they’re moving back into Iraq,’’ he said, according to a transcript posted on the show’s Web site.

        Let me see, this trip was suppose to show McCain as a world leader on the international stage, correct? This trip was to show how right McCain was about the surge and his valid reason for keeping US troops in Iraq for 100 more years, correct? This trip was to show that McCain has received the Bush/Cheney stamp of approval and would proudly carry the torch forward, correct?

        Well they got one thing right, he's carrying on the Bush/Cheney tradition of stupidity. We have lost 4,000 men and women, spent 500 billion dollars so far and the Iraqis are still fighting each other, limited to no electricity, no sewage, no jobs but like Bush/Cheney, lets spend another 500 billion and 100 more years there, right?. And McCain is suppose to be showing the world how competent he'll be as "commander in chief"? He can't name the correct enemy? Yes McCain you're carrying that Bush/Cheney stupid torch proudly.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by nonbearing137 (March 18, 2008 7:19 pm ET)
             
          oh, so what, he'll win anyway.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 18, 2008 8:56 pm ET)
               

            Right.  McCain is the candidate for the hopeless.

             

            I, for one, reject our robot overlords. 

            Report Abuse
      • Author by Kyle_Broflovski (March 19, 2008 3:36 pm ET)
           

        "what a hullabaloo over nothing"

        You mean like, whether 'Flack' is spelled with or without a 'c'?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (March 18, 2008 8:39 pm ET)
         

      I imagine you'll stay home election day then and enjoy John's victory in comfort. Possibly a little more out of touch with reality than usual.

      You've got arround a half a year to come up with inventive ways to call us idiots. Life is good.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by clore3090 (March 18, 2008 11:43 pm ET)
         

       

      Even this correction ignores the flub of equating al-Qaida in Iraq with al-Qaida proper. They are two different groups. 

      *****

       

      News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo/

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by barzia9256 (March 19, 2008 7:34 am ET)
         

       

      It is important for the media to correctly state what has said by candidates.  

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eniobob2631 (March 19, 2008 8:40 am ET)
         

      Waiting to see McCains reaction to the financial situation that has changed dramatically,since hes been out of the country.

      Remember he dosen,t know economics.Or much else it seems.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by eyerah (March 19, 2008 12:03 pm ET)
         

      "...McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said: "In a press conference today, John McCain misspoke and immediately corrected himself by stating that Iran is in fact supporting radical Islamic extremists in Iraq, not Al Qaeda"

      wow, what a blatant lie. he didn't immediately correct himself, he was corrected by joe lieberman after making the error three times! plus, mccain never referred to them as "radical islamic extremists".

      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (March 20, 2008 9:00 am ET)
           

        I guess Leiberman will tag along with McBush to keep things straight. A stroll down memory lane reminds me of a time when Pres Cheney and his sidekick Georgie W. went to a meeting and their was only one chair need for them. Leiberman, wear a glove.

        Let us be thankful that Sen. McB. did not say that Iranian insurgents were brought into Iraq, trained and returned to cause problems in Iran. He may just spill some state secrets.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (March 19, 2008 2:37 pm ET)
         
      I was pleasantly surprised to hear this story covered earlier today on Paul Harvey's daily 15-minute newscast.  Of course, Paul Harvey himself did not report it - Gil Gross was substitution for him.  But that newscast is hears on many radio stations with conservative audiences, and maybe the GOP rank-and-file is learning the truth about their annointed one.....
      Report Abuse