Ignoring previous CNN report, Blitzer uncritically repeated McCain's assertion that overseas trip is "not for campaign purposes"
SUMMARY: CNN host Wolf Blitzer simply reported Sen. John McCain's assertion that his current trip overseas is "not for campaign purposes" without noting that before McCain's trip, Dana Bash had quoted McCain advisers saying that the trip was at least in part an effort to "stay[] in the headlines" and promote the "imagery of a leader comfortable on the world stage."
On the March 17 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer uncritically repeated Sen. John McCain's assertion that his current weeklong trip to the Middle East and Europe is "not for campaign purposes." Blitzer did not mention, as Media Matters for America noted, that on the March 6 edition of Blitzer's own program, congressional correspondent Dana Bash reported that "[McCain] advisers tell CNN" that at least one purpose of McCain's overseas trip is to "stay[] in the headlines" and promote the "imagery of a leader comfortable on the world stage."
Blitzer teased a discussion on McCain's overseas trip by stating: "And John McCain sees up close the war he could inherit if he's elected president, travels to Iraq for the first time as the presumptive Republican nominee. McCain says it's not for campaign photo opportunities. What is he doing there?" Blitzer later previewed the discussion of the trip again, stating: "John McCain in Iraq -- the presumptive Republican nominee says it's not for campaign purposes. But what is it for?" After a commercial break, Blitzer asked CNN commentator Jack Cafferty about McCain's trip. Cafferty did appear to dispute the notion that McCain's trip was unrelated to his campaign, stating, "He took [Sen.] Lindsey Graham [R-SC] and [Sen.] Joe Lieberman [I-CT] with him -- two of his most visible and biggest supporters. And they're going to go to France and Britain and Jordan and Israel and Iraq. And you and I are paying for it. And I think that's wrong." But Blitzer replied, "I mean, he is a member ... of the Armed Services Committee. The two other senators are senior members of the Armed Services Committee. And that's what members of the Armed Services Committee do. They go on trips around the world." After Cafferty said, "Oh, come on. Give me a break, Wolf," CNN senior political analyst Gloria Borger said, "[T]hey say this was a long-planned trip. But, obviously, he's the presumptive Republican nominee now, and this is going to look like a political trip."
At no point did Blitzer or any of his guests mention evidence that McCain's trip could, in fact, be campaign-related, ignoring Bash's report that aired March 6 on The Situation Room.
From the March 17 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
BLITZER: To our viewers, you're in The Situation Room.
Happening now, the breaking news out of Florida: no revote in Florida. The state's Democratic Party saying it will not -- repeat, not -- hold a second primary. So what does that mean for [Sen.] Hillary Clinton and [Sen.] Barack Obama's battle for delegates?
Barack Obama is set to give a major speech on race. That happens tomorrow. But will it soothe some of the recent tension over racial issues?
And John McCain sees up close the war he could inherit if he's elected president, travels to Iraq for the first time as the presumptive Republican nominee. McCain says it's not for campaign photo opportunities. What is he doing there? All of this coming up, plus the best political team on television.
I'm Wolf Blitzer. You're in The Situation Room.
[...]
BLITZER: Stand by, guys. We got more to talk about.
BORGER: Keep those emails coming.
BLITZER: John McCain in Iraq -- the presumptive Republican nominee says it's not for campaign purposes. But what is it for?
And days of scandal eased by a bit of humor -- the New York state legislature swearing in a new governor and adding a new page to its history. And a new turn to the page -- and a turn on the page -- the recent very dark days in that state. The new governor of New York becomes a bit of a comedian. You're going to want to hear some of what he said.
Stay with us. You're in The Situation Room.
[...]
McCAIN [video clip]: I'll be glad to stake my campaign on the fact that this has succeeded and the American people appreciate it. Now, will we be able to succeed fast enough, will they be able to -- Al Qaeda be able to come back? That's a tough question. They're on the run, but they're not defeated.
BLITZER: John McCain speaking to our John King in Baghdad just a little while ago. Let's talk about what's going on with the best political team on television.
BLITZER: Jack, what do you think about McCain's visit to Iraq and what he's saying? He's hammering away at the two Democratic candidates for supposedly getting ready to throw up their hands and watch defeat happen in Iraq.
CAFFERTY: I think he ought to be reading a book on the economy while he's flying around over there -- on the taxpayers' dime, I might add. He took Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman with him -- two of his most visible and biggest supporters. And they're going to go to France and Britain and Jordan and Israel and Iraq. And you and I are paying for it.
And I think that's wrong. I think the old Straight Talk Express guy ought to go to his hip and pay for this crap out of his own money.
BLITZER: What do you think? I mean, he is a member, Gloria, of the Armed Services Committee. The two other senators are senior members of the Armed Services Committee. And that's what members of the Armed Services Committee do. They go on trips around the world.
CAFFERTY: Oh, come on. Give me a break, Wolf.
BORGER: Right. And they say this was a long-planned trip. But, obviously, he's the presumptive Republican nominee now, and this is going to look like a political trip.
From the March 6 edition of The Situation Room:
BASH: McCain's biggest challenge now is staying in the headlines. Knowing that, his advisers tell CNN they have a series of events planned to try.
First, travel abroad. Later this month, McCain will go to Europe and meet with key allies and also go to the Middle East.
McCAIN: I've spent my entire life addressing national security issues.
BASH: The goal: not just words, but imagery of a leader comfortable on the world stage, hoping it provides a contrast to the Democrats' political brawl.















And kids don't go trick-or-treating on Halloween for candy purposes. Nor do they write letters to Santa for present purposes.
Try again, Wolfie Boy.....
I thought I read somewhere that McCain is supposed to be attending a fund raiser in London sometime during this trip, if so how can he justify billing us, the American taxpayers for the trip?
I thought I read somewhere that McCain is supposed to be attending a fund raiser in London sometime during this trip, if so how can he justify billing us, the American taxpayers for the trip?
Good question.....
he'll have the campaign reimburse the government for a portion of the trip. nothing new about that.
BASH: McCain's biggest challenge now is staying in the headlines. Knowing that, his advisers tell CNN they have a series of events planned to try.
I guess the first "event" was for McCain to mis-speak about Al-Queda, and then have Joe Liberman explain it to him...
McCAIN: I've spent my entire life addressing national security issues.
OK, John - how were you addressing national security issues in kindergarten????
"Gotcha", WZ!
and BTW, not to poke holes in your point above, but as a child I did not go trick-or-treating for candy-getting purposes, strictly for Satanic purposes.
I was just thinking how bad McCain's thought process must be getting if Lieberman is the one explaining anything to him. Thats like the blind leading the retarded across the track at the Daytona 500.
By the way, McCain's campaign is paying for the last part of his trip since he will not be a part of the congressional group returning from Iraq.
Jill Hazelbaker, Mr. McCain’s campaign spokeswoman, said in an e-mail message on Friday that Congress would be reimbursed for the political portions of Mr. McCain’s trip, including Mr. McCain’s flight home, when he will travel separately from the rest of the Congressional delegation.
“We are also paying for the fund-raiser and his hotel that evening in London,’’ Ms. Hazelbaker said in the e-mail.
My guess is that payment is more certain in this instance as opposed to any funny money allegedly returned to very patriotic chinese dishwashers in New York or to recent immigrants bundled by Norman Hsu!
Here's something actually important to consider MM(very little) fans:
The three White House hopefuls supported the moratorium, even though key senators on both sides opposed it. McCain, who has refused to request spending for projects in his home state of Arizona, has long been a vocal critic of earmarks.Clinton and Obama announced this week they favor the ban, despite their own use of earmarks.Clinton grabbed $342 million worth of earmarks last year, ranking her 10th highest on the list of senators, according to the budget watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense. But as of Thursday, the Clinton campaign still had not released details on how much she requested for 2007 and what it was for.
The senator "is proud of the investments in New York she has secured," according to her spokesman Philippe Reines. But she believes the one-year ban "will allow a hard look at how more sunlight and transparency can be brought to this process," Reines added.
Obama in fiscal year 2008 secured $98 million in funding for Illinois projects, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense. Information released Thursday by the Obama campaign indicates he requested $311 million in earmarks for the same year.
Also according to information released Thursday by the Obama camp, the Illinois senator had 138 earmark requests for the 2007 fiscal year.
His total requested funding was about $330 million. His average request was about $2.4 million, with the largest request being $62 million intended to modify a Boeing 747 aircraft to capture infrared images of the Earth.
McCain said the Democratic presidential candidates are late to the anti-earmarks position, saying both have requested earmarks using taxpayer dollars "that are absolutely outrageously wasted." Watch what McCain says about their earmarks
"I think they should ask that those earmarks that they asked for and obtained -- the money that hasn't been spent yet -- ask them to turn that money back to the Treasury," McCain said.
Who better to propose and secure help for any individual state than that state's US Senator? They're the advocates for their state, as well as their state's representative in the 100 member US Senate.
Without a doubt, there are earmarks that are not a good investment, but there are many that are good investments too.
Beach Blondie,
You may be correct that some programs are necessary and completely appropriate, however much of the problem with the Republican loss in 06 had to do with their unbridled spending. The Democrats correctly exploited that to win back the congress.
The sad fact is that politicians feel little pressure to restrain their desire to bring home the pork. they would rather not have citizens really look at where this money goes. I am speaking about members of all political parties.
With this issue, it seems that both Clinton and Obama have recently joined in the feeding frenzy. And Mrs. Clinton's unwillingness to expose her earmarks, makes her pledge to put a stop to this kind of politics appear hypocritical.
Why not make 'earmarks' subject to the light of day before they are hidden in various bills?