So that's why NBC and MSNBC wanted Clinton's schedules?
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
SUMMARY: On Today, Tim Russert discussed the schedules from Sen. Hillary Clinton's time as first lady and asserted: "Senator Clinton has made her experience such a part of this campaign, particularly her eight years as first lady. So this may be very rich in terms of exactly how did she spend her time, who did she meet with?" Russert added that "this, I think, today will be analyzed very closely by all of us at NBC News and media organizations across the country." Indeed, while NBC and MSNBC journalists discussed more substantive issues related to her schedules, they also repeatedly discussed what the schedules say, or do not say, about where Hillary Clinton was during Monica Lewinsky's encounters with President Clinton, in many cases teasing segments or leading them with that information.
On the March 19 edition of NBC's Today, discussing the release of 11,000 pages of schedules from Sen. Hillary Clinton's time as first lady, NBC News Washington bureau chief Tim Russert asserted: "Senator Clinton has made her experience such a part of this campaign, particularly her eight years as first lady. So this may be very rich in terms of exactly how did she spend her time, who did she meet with?" Russert added that "this, I think, today will be analyzed very closely by all of us at NBC News and media organizations across the country." Indeed, on March 20, NBC and MSNBC journalists did discuss the documents during several segments throughout the day. And while they discussed more substantive issues related to her schedules, such as NAFTA, Bosnia, and Northern Ireland, they also repeatedly discussed what the schedules say, or do not say, about where Hillary Clinton was during Monica Lewinsky's encounters with President Clinton, in many cases teasing segments or leading them with that information.
On the 9 a.m. ET hour of MSNBC Live, anchor Mika Brzezinski introduced a segment about the schedules by stating: "More politics now, and the 11,000 pages of documents that provides some insight into Senator Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady. A lot of it's redacted, though, so you don't get all the insight that you want." She continued: "Among the revelations, though, that Mrs. Clinton was at the White House on at least seven occasions when her husband was engaging in those encounters with Monica Lewinsky." Later in the segment, Brzezinski had this exchange with NBC correspondent Kevin Corke:
CORKE: And lastly, I can tell you that as far as the Monica Lewinsky thing is concerned, on the night that most people found out about it, Senator Clinton, then first lady Clinton, was at the White House at 7:25, then left, and then came back 25 minutes later. It does make you wonder what -- the sort of, you know -- what happened in those 25 minutes, what happened after she got back, but again, you don't get that clear sense, because that's not something we would find in paperwork like this.
BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, I think that might be their personal business. Kevin, thank you very much. I appreciate it. And we'll hear more about this, I'm sure.
During a second segment later that hour, Brzezinski said to Washington Post staff writer Peter Baker, "So clearly there's some interest in the Monica Lewinsky scandal, and what do the records show about who was where, when?" Baker replied, "Right. She was there when a lot of these encounters happened. She was in the building, in the house as it were, different part of the house, obviously. Sort of adds, I think, to the discomfort that [unintelligible] about that scandal." Baker continued: "That's not entirely new, we sort of knew that, but it sort of reinforces what we learned at the time the Starr Report came out in 1998."
During the 10 a.m. ET hour of MSNBC Live, anchor Tamron Hall introduced a segment on the schedules by asserting: "New documents released by the Bill Clinton Presidential Library offer the most extensive record of Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady. Now, among the revelations that Mrs. Clinton was at the White House at least seven occasions when her husband engaged in encounters with Monica Lewinsky." She also said to Corke: "[B]esides the curiosities, I guess, involving Monica Lewinsky, I think the heart of what a lot of people want to know is whether or not these documents back up any foreign policy experience that the first lady has talk -- well, the then-first lady has talked about."
Anchor Contessa Brewer began a segment on the schedules on the 11 a.m. ET edition of MSNBC Live by saying: "We want to talk about the 11,000 pages of documents released by Bill Clinton's presidential library that provide the most comprehensive insight into Senator Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady. Among the revelations, that Mrs. Clinton was at the White House on at least seven occasions when her husband was engaging in sexual encounters with Monica Lewinsky."
During the noon ET hour of MSNBC Live, Hall introduced a segment on the schedules with Washington Post editorial page writer Jonathan Capehart and Houston Chronicle White House correspondent Julie Mason by asserting: "More than 11,000 pages of documents released by the Clinton presidential library detail Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady. In addition to providing a record of her policy meetings, the documents also shed some light, at least on the timeline, a little bit of light, on the timeline that was going on during the infamous Monica Lewinsky scandal."
Later in the segment, Hall reported that according to the schedules, "during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, it shows that Mrs. Clinton was at the White House at least seven occasions when Bill Clinton was otherwise --" Hall paused, and then said in unison with Capehart, "[e]ngaged." Hall continued: "-- engaged, uh-huh, with Monica Lewinsky. I know that's tawdry, but it's what people are talking about. But what relevance could it play in anything?" Capehart replied, "It just puts Hillary Clinton near the scene of the crime, if you will. That's all it does." Later in the segment, Hall purported to "try to make a political issue out of it," saying, "Bill Clinton, her number one surrogate by her side -- does this potentially bring up bad blood, you know, that may have been going on in their marriage that could hurt her later? I'm trying to make this political." Capehart replied: "Good luck, Tamron. I mean, this is one of those issues. We know about Monica, we know about the president and Monica, and all sorts of other things that have been going on." He continued: "If anything, like I said before, what we now know through these schedules is, we know where President Clinton was, we know where Monica was, and now we know where Mrs. Clinton was." Hall responded, "OK. One more political stab at it then. Julie, you think this will help her with women voters? Might they hear that she was in the White House when he was with another woman -- more outrage, how strong, how tough, how much she's persevered, and 'I'm going to support her'?" Mason replied, "Maybe a little bit," adding, "[W]e're so inoculated to the whole Lewinsky thing, I'm not sure it cuts either way at this point."
On the 1 p.m. ET hour of MSNBC Live, Brewer provided the following report on the schedules:
BREWER: Let's get back to politics here. We're getting some insight into Hillary Clinton's role during her time as first lady now that 11,000 pages of her schedules during those years have been released. So where was Mrs. Clinton during those infamous sexual encounters between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky? According to the logs, she was in the White House on at least half a dozen of those occasions. The schedules also detail her extensive world travels, her work on failed health care reform, and her previous support of NAFTA.
On March 20, MSNBC Live anchors used the following statements to tease segments on the release of the Clinton White House schedules:
- During the 9 a.m. ET hour, Brzezinski asserted: "Plus, revelations from the Hillary Clinton files. What was she doing on the days when Monica Lewinsky was in the Oval Office?"
- Also during the 9 a.m. ET hour, Brzezinski said: "Well, if you ever wondered what Hillary Clinton was doing when Monica Lewinsky was in the Oval Office, we're going to tell you what's buried in those papers from Hillary's time as first lady."
- During the 10 a.m. ET hour, Hall said: "And Hillary Clinton's White House papers go public. What it says about her White House experience and what it reveals about what she was doing during the Monica Lewinsky affair."
- During the 11 a.m. ET hour, Brewer asserted: "Ever wonder what Hillary Clinton was doing when Monica Lewinsky was in the Oval Office? We'll tell you what's buried in those papers from Hillary's time as first lady."
- During the 1 p.m. ET hour, Brewer said: "Coming up, what do we know about those 11,000 pages of schedules from Hillary Clinton's time in the White House? Are there answers to Mrs. Clinton's days during events that changed history, events like the war in Kosovo, the USS Cole attack or the Monica Lewinsky scandal? That's next."
Further, during a report on the schedules on the March 20 edition of NBC's Today, NBC News senior investigative correspondent Lisa Myers stated that Clinton's "schedule shows her at home in the White House on a number of days when her husband had sexual encounters there with Monica Lewinsky."
In addition, a March 19 ABCNews.com article headlined "Hillary at White House on 'Stained Blue Dress' Day," Brian Ross and the ABC News investigative unit reported in their first sentence that "Hillary Clinton spent the night in the White House on the day her husband had oral sex with Monica Lewinsky, and may have actually been in the White House when it happened, according to records of her schedule released today by the National Archives."
From the March 19 edition of NBC's Today:
MEREDITH VIEIRA (co-host): Meanwhile, today they're releasing -- the Clinton camp is releasing 11,000 pages of her schedule when she was first lady. Any surprises you expect?
RUSSERT: We do not know. There have been several lawsuits asking for this information. Senator Clinton has made her experience such a part of this campaign, particularly her eight years as first lady. So this may be very rich in terms of exactly how did she spend her time, who did she meet with? We don't know how much -- how censored or redacted some of these documents will be. This will be the first step in a document dump, Meredith. Next comes the Clinton tax returns for every year since the White House, where their income has gone up rather dramatically. And then the remaining question is, will the Clintons release the $500 million in donors that gave money to the foundation and library? Thus far they have resisted. But this, I think, today will be analyzed very closely by all of us at NBC News and media organizations across the country.
VIEIRA: All right, more to come. Tim Russert, as always, thanks very much.
RUSSERT: Thanks, Meredith.
From the March 20 edition of NBC's Today:
VIEIRA: And now NBC News investigates presidential contender Hillary Clinton. Did her time as first lady make her the one you'd want to answer that emergency phone call in the middle of the night? Well, NBC's senior investigative correspondent Lisa Myers has been pouring through those newly released papers documenting her every move during the Clinton administration. Lisa, good morning to you.
MYERS: Good morning, Meredith. Senator Clinton cites her years in the White House as evidence that she's best qualified to be commander in chief, but these new documents detailing her schedule over eight years show a mixed bag when it comes to substantive involvement in foreign policy.
[begin video clip]
MYERS: The 11,000 pages of the first lady's schedule show a continuing interest in substantive meetings on Bosnia and the effort to find peace in Northern Ireland, but when the 3 a.m. crisis hit --
AD NARRATOR: Who do you want answering the phone?
MYERS: Which she now says she's best-prepared to handle, her schedule suggests she was not involved. Take the 1998 bombing of two U.S. embassies by Al Qaeda. Her schedule does not show any foreign policy meetings in the aftermath but does show a trip to Andrews Air Force Base to console victims and families as they returned to the U.S. And there are plenty of missing details in these pages, especially unexplained private meetings redacted during the dark days of 1998. Her schedule shows her at home in the White House on a number of days when her husband had sexual encounters there with Monica Lewinsky.
CLINTON: Well, you know, I think I'm probably the most transparent person in public life.
MYERS: These documents were released as the results of a lawsuit, and so far, only 1 percent of documents from the Clinton library have been made public.
From the 9 a.m. ET hour of the March 20 edition of MSNBC Live:
BRZEZINSKI: Plus, revelations from the Hillary Clinton files. What was she doing on the days when Monica Lewinsky was in the Oval Office?
[...]
BRZEZINSKI: All right, Jeff Ranieri, thank you very much. We'll talk to you again soon. Well, if you ever wondered what Hillary Clinton was doing when Monica Lewinsky was in the Oval Office, we're going to tell you what's buried in those papers from Hillary's time as first lady.
[...]
BRZEZINSKI: More politics now, and the 11,000 pages of documents that provides some insight into Senator Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady. A lot of it's redacted, though, so you don't get all the insight that you want. Among the revelations, though, that Mrs. Clinton was at the White House on at least seven occasions when her husband was engaging in those encounters with Monica Lewinsky. Let's go now to NBC's Kevin Corke. He joins us now from Washington. Kevin, these documents reveal mostly Hillary Clinton's public schedule. A lot of unanswered questions, too. What can we -- what conclusions can we draw out of what we've seen so far?
[...]
CORKE: And lastly, I can tell you that as far as the Monica Lewinsky thing is concerned, on the night that most people found out about it, Senator Clinton, then first lady Clinton, was at the White House at 7:25, then left, and then came back 25 minutes later. It does make you wonder what -- the sort of, you know -- what happened in those 25 minutes, what happened after she got back, but again, you don't get that clear sense, because that's not something we would find in paperwork like this.
BRZEZINSKI: Yeah, I think that might be their personal business. Kevin, thank you very much. I appreciate it. And we'll hear more about this, I'm sure.
[...]
BRZEZINSKI: Right. OK. So clearly there's some interest in the Monica Lewinsky scandal, and what do the records show about who was where, when?
BAKER: Right. She was there when a lot of these encounters happened. She was in the building, in the house as it were, different part of the house, obviously. Sort of adds, I think, to the discomfort that [unintelligible] about that scandal. That's not entirely new, we sort of knew that, but it sort of reinforces what we learned at the time the Starr Report came out in 1998.
BRZEZINSKI: OK. Well, we'll be waiting to hear if there's anything more with phone logs, I know those are in question.
From the 10 a.m. ET hour of the March 20 edition of MSNBC Live:
HALL: And Hillary Clinton's White House papers go public. What it says about her White House experience and what it reveals about what she was doing during the Monica Lewinsky affair.
[...]
HALL: New documents released by the Bill Clinton Presidential Library offer the most extensive record of Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady. Now, among the revelations that Mrs. Clinton was at the White House at least seven occasions when her husband engaged in encounters with Monica Lewinsky. NBC's Kevin Corke joins us now from Washington. And Kevin, besides the curiosities, I guess, involving Monica Lewinsky, I think the heart of what a lot of people want to know is whether or not these documents back up any foreign policy experience that the first lady has talk -- well, the then-first lady has talked about, now presidential candidate, and some of the questions about private meetings that are left unclear in these documents.
From the 11 a.m. ET hour of the March 20 edition of MSNBC Live:
BREWER: Ever wonder what Hillary Clinton was doing when Monica Lewinsky was in the Oval Office? We'll tell you what's buried in those papers from Hillary's time as first lady.
[...]
BREWER: We want to talk about the 11,000 pages of documents released by Bill Clinton's presidential library that provide the most comprehensive insight into Senator Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady. Among the revelations, that Mrs. Clinton was at the White House on at least seven occasions when her husband was engaging in sexual encounters with Monica Lewinsky.
NBC's Kevin Corke joins us from Washington. Kevin, we were talking yesterday, a lot of pages to read. A lot, though, that we're finding out has been left out or redacted. But do we have an idea of what that was?
From the noon. ET hour of the March 20 edition of MSNBC Live:
HALL: And back to politics. More than 11,000 pages of documents released by the Clinton presidential library detail Hillary Clinton's tenure as first lady. In addition to providing a record of her policy meetings, the documents also shed some light, at least on the timeline, a little bit of light, on the timeline that was going on during the infamous Monica Lewinsky scandal. Jonathan Capehart is an editorial writer with The Washington Post. Julie Mason is White House correspondent for the Houston Chronicle. Thank you both.
CAPEHART: Hi, Tamron.
HALL: Before we talk about the Monica Lewinsky part of it, Jonathan, has there been any bombshell information to come out? I know people are still looking at these documents.
CAPEHART: Well, I think if they're looking for bombshell information, they're certainly -- probably not going to find it in her schedules. I was able to look at some of them, and they're, you know, just a few lines, you know, "private meeting with prime minister of Norway," or, you know, "policy meeting in the yellow oval room," and things like that. It doesn't give you any context or any details of what happened in those meetings.
HALL: And, Julie, has there been any information from what you've been able to discern and hear about -- that back up Hillary Clinton's claims of being in the White House gave her foreign policy experience, or could help her foreign policy experience if she gets the nomination?
MASON: Well, Tamron, I've heard it spun both ways by now. The Clinton campaign obviously saying that this absolutely, this information backs up her claim that she was in the room and had a role. But, you know, I've heard the other side, too, and saying, you know, for example, she wasn't there when, you know, the Belfast Accords were figured out, she was back here in Washington and she really wasn't in the room. And as Jonathan said, the records that were released don't really support either side. I mean, you know, it's kind of a wash for her.
HALL: It's kind of a wash. All right, Jonathan, and something else people are talking about -- I guess her schedule shows that during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, it shows that Mrs. Clinton was at the White House at least seven occasions when Bill Clinton was otherwise --
HALL and CAPEHART: Engaged --
HALL: -- engaged, uh-huh, with Monica Lewinsky. I know that's tawdry, but it's what people are talking about. But what relevance could it play in anything?
CAPEHART: It just puts Hillary Clinton near the scene of the crime, if you will. That's all it does.
[pause]
CAPEHART: I left you speechless, Tamron. What happened?
MASON: OK, I'll jump in. I'll jump in on that.
HALL: I'm sorry. Julie, go ahead.
MASON: It's true, it's one of those cases where you -- reporters sort of can't resist the urge to look at these documents and compare them against those days.
HALL: Yeah. OK.
MASON: So it's like, I would compare it to the same impulse as looking at a car wreck.
CAPEHART: Right.
HALL: All right, so I'll try to make a political issue out of it then.
MASON: All right.
HALL: Bill Clinton, her number one surrogate by her side -- does this potentially bring up bad blood, you know, that may have been going on in their marriage that could hurt her later? I'm trying to make this political.
CAPEHART: Good luck, Tamron. I mean, this is one of those issues. We know about Monica, we know about the president and Monica, and all sorts of other things that have been going on. If anything, like I said before, what we now know through these schedules is, we know where President Clinton was, we know where Monica was, and now we know where Mrs. Clinton was.
HALL: OK. One more political stab at it then. Julie, you think this will help her with women voters? Might they hear that she was in the White House when he was with another woman -- more outrage, how strong, how tough, how much she's persevered, and "I'm going to support her"?
MASON: Maybe a little bit. You know, that does, that issue, Tamron, does resonate with a lot of women. But I don't know, I mean, I think we're so inured, we're so inoculated to the whole Lewinsky thing, I'm not sure it cuts either way at this point.
HALL: All right, thank you both. Julie, Jonathan -- appreciate it.
CAPEHART: Sure.
MASON: Thank you.
HALL: I'm Tamron Hall. My colleague Contessa Brewer picks up our coverage next.
From the 1 p.m. ET hour of the March 20 edition of MSNBC Live:
BREWER: Coming up, what do we know about those 11,000 pages of schedules from Hillary Clinton's time in the White House? Are there answers to Mrs. Clinton's days during events that changed history, events like the war in Kosovo, the USS Cole attack or the Monica Lewinsky scandal? That's next.
[...]
BREWER: Let's get back to politics here. We're getting some insight into Hillary Clinton's role during her time as first lady now that 11,000 pages of her schedules during those years have been released. So where was Mrs. Clinton during those infamous sexual encounters between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky? According to the logs, she was in the White House on at least half a dozen of those occasions. The schedules also detail her extensive world travels, her work on failed health care reform, and her previous support of NAFTA.

















Cheney's meetings had NO effect on gas prices. It's called a FREE MARKET and the laws of supply and demand. Not that a Liberal has any grasp of those concepts.
One reason supply is low is because we can't drill for oil in this country nor can we build new refineries thanks to Liberal environmental policies. So, if you want to know the reason your gas is so high don't look to Cheney's schedule, but look in the MIRROR
My point exactly. No need to rely on OPEC setting the price when we can get oil from fields on American soil. I didn't take economics classes taught by Marxists who brainwashed me to think like you do.
I second that WOLF......
It seems to me that it is a bit to late for the media to finally try and act with "truthiness" as it pertains to Hillary's schedule and where abouts those 8 years as first lady......
It would have been......I don't know..... the right thing for these slobs to have done the same thing to Bush as well!
Suddenly these people want to act all righteous going after the Dems.....
Gee...... thanks for nothing 4th estate!
TOMMY,
Do you agree that it would have been just and proper for the media to delve into Bush's and Cheney's where-abouts and dealings from years past and demanded the same as they are of Hillary and Barack today?
If the national media had simply done even a cursory examination of the local journalists of Texas (Slater and Ivins come to mind) on what they knew about and had dug up about Bush, it's aweful tempting to make the claim that we'd be talking about president Al Gore these last 7 years and Bush would be nothing more than the obscure son of an ex-president!
It is also equally likely that few of us would be confounded by; who the heck Dick Cheney even was?
Let me get this straight, Tommy - You "expected" this to be the first day the media looked into once they got their hands on the records? You must be even more cynical than many of the rest of us.
I’m not saying that I would have been surprised that someone highlighted the records for that day – but I would have ”expected” it to be weeks later, and by someone like Limbaugh or Drudge – and NOT a major “news” network. NBC was not the only guilty party – This is worse than sophomoric – it’s more like something a second year 6th grader would focus on!
an alcoholic, draft dodging obscure son of an ex-president. but i digress.
ok, going out on a long limb here. i think i can say, with some certainty, that sen. clinton was in the white house at least 7 days during her husband's presidency. i have no idea how she spent the other 2,913 days of his two terms.
what the lewinsky thing has to do with her current campaign is never really made clear. possibly (again, going out on a limb here) because it has nothing to do with it, just low-end MSM pornography.
i note also that the headlines stating that these records contradict the sen.'s assertion, that she didn't support NAFTA originally, do no such thing. the records themselves only indicate that she attended a meeting or spoke at a meeting, not what the content was. not surprising, they are only a schedule, not notes.
i should be surprised that the headlines would be such flagrant lies, but unfortunately it's reached the point where i'm not.
CPINVA observes; “what the lewinsky thing has to do with her current campaign is never really made clear.”
Ah, CLARITY, the entire reason for a FREE PRESS, Reporters digging hard to come up with the FACTS and RELEVANT INFORMATION in order to properly inform the American Public about issues of great concern to their every-day lives.
On-screen MEDIA reps like CORKE above, who demonstrates how hard-hitting investigative reporting can result in devastating revelations …
CORKE: “It does make you wonder …” [WAIT FOR IT …]
“… what -- the sort of, you know – “ [WEASELS AND STAMMERS AND PAP, OH MY!]“… what happened in those 25 minutes, what happened after she got back …” [WHAT HAPPENED? WE MUST KNOW!!!]
“… but again, you don't get that clear sense …” [“NO CLEAR SENSE” … SO SPECULATE, ENGAGE IN INNUENDO, AND INTIMATE WHAT IS “HIDDEN”! THAT’S THE TICKET!]
“… because that's not something we would find in paperwork like this.” [ALL SUCH PAPERWORK DOES IS ALLOW CLOAKED SMEARS AND THE REVISITING OF PAST “SCANDAL” … WHICH IS ALL OUR CURRENT MEDIA REQUIRES.]
-------
CPINVA: What Lewinsky has to do with the current campaign will NEVER “be made clear”. What IS clear is that our current “Liberal Media” will go negative on Clinton and Obama with any opening whatsoever, while simultaneously downplaying the FACT that McCain does not know A THING about such issues as defense, foreign policy, the economy, or anything else. He’s a “MAVERICK”, and that’s all you need to know.
sen. clinton was in the white house at least 7 days during her husband's presidency. i have no idea how she spent the other 2,913 days of his two terms.
And I bet you won't hear much about it either. It will be boring political stuff, not the titillating dirt the media craves (and Tommy expects but does not deplore).
Somerby at the Daily Howler put it best today:
"Why did reporters want to review those records? Of course! So they could flip to the dates involving Lewinsky and laugh about what Hillary Clinton was doing! They stroked their thighs and pleasured themselves, praising “open government” as they did."
Why don't they ask for his schedule during the Keating scandal? Or the recent lobbyist issue?
Or for details about his trophy wife's addiction to painkillers.
O MY E"FFING GOD, please I pray do not subject us all to 24/7 news shows about who was where...and when....and gettin what...regarding Clinton and Ms. Clinton and Lewinsky.
24/7 news shows about who was where...and when....and gettin what...regarding Clinton and Ms. Clinton and Lewinsky.
and their pale, flabby, naked bodies...uck,uck, I think I just threw up in my mouth a little
and their pale, flabby, naked bodies...uck,uck, I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.
RELAX. Your letting your imagination run away from reality. Bill and Hill probably didn't do it very much if ever and for Bill and Monica it was clothed and non-coital or there would be no blue dress.
Liberal Media?
Bullsh*t.
The media IS liberal, and I will prove it with a prediction.
First some background. Even though the media is liberal, ratings trump bias. Clinton and Obama are just better stories right now. As soon as the general election cycle starts they will come down hard on McCain.
Watch and learn.
NETSEZ:
We've been "watching and learning" for YEARS. We watched and saw, for example, GW Bush getting a completely free ride, while Gore was being portrayed as a liar and a serial "exaggerator" using LIES about what he said.
Yep, it was THE MEDIA favoring Bush, asking no questions, and consuming the only guy ... Dan Rather ... who dared to look into Bush's strange and perverse "military" history. No scrutiny at all on Bush from that episode, but Rather had to be FIRED.
Ah, and then there was the 24/7 coverage and endless speculating about the SWIFT BOAT fellows, which probably cost war veteran Kerry the election.
So, we've been watching this MEDIA for quite some time, and the PATTERNS are very clear. Bush gets a completely free ride, despite actions and errors which would have justified impeachment, while Clinton is subjected to constant "SCANDAL" coverage, with endless investigations ALL OF WHICH proved there was no story there in the first place.
THE MEDIA is clearly owned and operated by THE RIGHT, doing their bidding, and it will continue (as it is now ... you even ADMIT that McCain is getting bend-over-backward excuse making from the MEDIA, you just speculate (based on NOTHING in recent history) that it will "change" come the general election. And this "PROVES" a Liberal Media Bias? LOL
gotta agree, there is no coverage of the issues nor of mccains little gaffes, just petty bull crap all the time, 24/7. Plus, I really don't care where Ms Clinton was when Bill was getting his BJ. Does anyone?
Eden...you need some chewing gum to take that bad taste out of your mouth?
Some day maybe the news will be just that ... the news .... but I'm not holding my breath for it.
Thanks LOR
but is is freaky friday and I'm about to enjoy a frosty adult beverage
gonna settle on beer until Tommy and Jeter show up, they both owe me a drink and I'm going top shelf
Which reminds me, my son is in the process of opening a MicroBrewery this year, Cigar City Brewing, in Tampa.....
You guys just might want to try one!! heh.
Meanwhile, could any of those busy network executives out there be bothered to ask their reporters to tell us:
1) how core inflation is way up while wages are stagnant, making food, gasoline, and other necessities even more expensive?
2) how foreclosures are lowering property values and causing sales losses for responsible homeowners, the neighbors of those who took on risky mortgages or were duped by unregulated lenders?
3) how close we are coming to "success" in Iraq and Afghanistan, which will save lives and bring home millions of dollars that can be spent to solve some of economic problems?
4) how much we currently owe China and Japan?
5) how the stock market has tanked in the last 6 months, and with lowered interest rates, people saving for education or retirement, or retirees are losing money and struggling?
6) what will happen if another right wing judge gets appointed to the US Supreme Court?
etc.
Yeah, these stories are a lot less important than humiliating the Clintons.
I'm definitely not a Clinton supporter; I'm super-pro Obama. However, this stuff is way over the top. I'm absolutely sick and tired of the media in general as it relates to all matters, including the handling of partisan issues.
In general, I'm tired of these dividing lines and people telling me what I should think about things. When are we all going to move forward from this childishness?