About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Cameron asserted as fact that "[m]any Europeans mistakenly believe that if elected, McCain will mimic all Bush policies"

March 23, 2008 1:22 pm ET

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

SUMMARY: In a Fox News report, Carl Cameron asserted as fact that "[m]any Europeans mistakenly believe that if elected, [Sen. John] McCain will mimic all Bush policies," citing as evidence of their purported "mistake[]" that "McCain was a leading critic of the early Bush Iraq strategy, and has disagreed on various issues ranging from how aggressively to combat climate change to wanting to close Guantánamo Bay." However, Cameron did not note that McCain has entirely embraced President Bush's current Iraq policy.

20 Comments

During the March 20 edition of Fox News' Special Report, chief political correspondent Carl Cameron asserted as fact that "[m]any Europeans mistakenly believe that if elected, [Sen. John] McCain will mimic all Bush policies," citing as evidence of their purported "mistake[]" that "McCain was a leading critic of the early Bush Iraq strategy, and has disagreed on various issues ranging from how aggressively to combat climate change to wanting to close Guantánamo Bay." Putting aside the fact that Cameron's statement amounts to a journalist asserting that a prediction -- not a statement of past events -- is "mistaken[]," the evidence Cameron purported to offer in support of his assertion excludes a central fact: McCain has entirely embraced President Bush's current Iraq policy. In a March 5 White House endorsement, Bush himself, with McCain at his side, said that McCain is "not going to change when it comes to taking on the enemy."

Further, reporting on Bush's endorsement, The Washington Post reported that White House officials said: "McCain and Bush are on the same page on the big issues, such as terrorism, Iraq, immigration and taxes." Indeed, while McCain voted against the final version of President Bush's initial $1.35 trillion tax-cut package in 2001 and, in 2003, voted against legislation to accelerate the tax reductions enacted in the 2001 bill and to cut dividends and capital gains taxes, in February 2006, he switched positions and voted to extend the 2003 tax cuts on capital gains and dividends through 2010.

Additionally, Cameron stated: "Though the reputation of the United States has declined worldwide as a result of the Iraq war, in an exclusive interview with Fox News, McCain insisted it is not as bad as the blame-America-first folks back home believe."

The Associated Press noted on March 19 that "[b]oth Democratic candidates have said they would begin withdrawing forces quickly if elected. Only expected GOP nominee John McCain has indicated he planned to continue Bush's strategy of bringing troops home only as conditions warrant." Indeed, on his campaign website, McCain states: "Ultimately, Iraq's future lies in the hands of its people, government, and armed forces, and strengthening them is an essential requirement for bringing U.S. troops home from Iraq. Until Iraqi forces are ready, however, a precipitous U.S. withdrawal would condemn Iraq to civil war and intervention by its neighbors and energize al Qaeda and other jihadists across the globe."

On March 5, when Bush officially announced he was endorsing McCain for president, Bush and McCain were asked "how the Republican Party, which has been here for eight years, is going to make the case that you're going to provide the change that the voters seem to want, both on Iraq and the economy." Bush responded that McCain is "not going to change when it comes to taking on the enemy. He understands this is a dangerous world." After Bush's response, McCain said: "Thank you, sir. I don't have anything to add." From the White House press conference:

MICHAEL ABRAMOWITZ (Washington Post reporter): I wanted to ask about the -- the voters, according to a lot of the exit polls, seem to be searching for change this year. And I'd like to ask both of you -- excuse me -- I'd like to ask both of you how the Republican Party, which has been here for eight years, is going to make the case that you're going to provide the change that the voters seem to want, both on Iraq and on the economy?

BUSH: Let me start off by saying that in 2000, I said, "Vote for me, I'm an agent of change." In 2004, I said: "I'm not interested in change. I want to continue as president." Every candidate has got to say "change." That's what the American people expect.

And the good news about our candidate is, there'll be a new president, a man of character and courage -- but he's not going to change when it comes to taking on the enemy. He understands this is a dangerous world; and I understand we better have steadfast leadership, who's got the courage and determination to pursue this enemy, so as to protect America.

John McCain will find out, when he takes the oath of office, his most important responsibility is to protect the American people from harm. And there's still an enemy that lurks, an enemy that wants to strike us, and this country better have somebody in that Oval Office who understands the stakes -- and John McCain understands those stakes.

McCAIN: Thank you, sir. I don't have anything to add.

As Think Progress noted, after the press conference, National Review editor Rich Lowry stated on Fox News that "obviously" Bush "views John McCain ... as a successor to himself."

The Washington Post reported on March 6 that "White House officials said that whatever their past differences, McCain and Bush are on the same page on the big issues, such as terrorism, Iraq, immigration and taxes. Barry Jackson, the president's senior political adviser, said Bush 'is more than comfortable turning over the house keys to Senator McCain.' Jackson also said that many White House officials acutely feel a 'debt' to McCain for his help during the 2004 reelection campaign and other battles."

From the March 20 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume:

CAMERON: Next stop, the House of Commons, and conservative party leader David Cameron, a McCain friend and fan. Though the reputation of the United States has declined worldwide as a result of the Iraq war, in an exclusive interview with Fox News, McCain insisted it is not as bad as the blame-America-first folks back home believe.

McCAIN: I don't think there's any doubt that the world still looks to America to lead and that they admire us. They respect us.

CAMERON: Many Europeans mistakenly believe that if elected, McCain will mimic all Bush policies, but McCain was a leading critic of the early Bush Iraq strategy, and has disagreed on various issues ranging from how aggressively to combat climate change to wanting to close Guantánamo Bay. Not, however, while overseas.

McCAIN: Those differences are well-known for many years, but I am not going to come to Europe, not only as a candidate in the future, but now as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and highlight those differences.

CAMERON: Amid growing uncertainty about the U.S. and global economy, McCain reversed his now-famous assertion that economics is not his specialty.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (March 23, 2008 1:28 pm ET)
         
      only the good ones.  let the search begin.  anything in here?  nope, another dead end.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (March 23, 2008 1:39 pm ET)
         

      Fox News Hearts McCain

      And Europe must be insane

      To think Pappa John

      Will continue the con

      To Fox, the truth is a pain

      Report Abuse
      • Author by draftedin68 (March 23, 2008 3:20 pm ET)
           

         

        I know it's whack

        And so absurd

        But at FOX, "fact"

        Is a four letter word

         

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Col. Harlan Sanders (March 23, 2008 4:20 pm ET)
           

        Eoropeans might misconstrue

        The future from their point-of-view

        McCain's senior moments

        In his mind could foment

        Policies that are brand new

        Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (March 23, 2008 6:27 pm ET)
         
      I honestly don't see much difference in the future policies of McCain and the current ones of Bush. I don't see this being false at all. McCain, in the eyes of the MSM and some hard-liners, may be considered a "centrist" here in the U.S. but in Europe he's undebateably conservative.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tman418 (March 23, 2008 6:30 pm ET)
           
        Oh wait a minute! I see the point there. I think what MMFA should do is emphasize the word "mistakenly" here, seeing as how that is misinformation, regardless as to whether Europeans feel that way or not. Well, other than torture, yeah, I think the Europeans are right.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (March 23, 2008 8:23 pm ET)
         

      It's like a Republican committee as portrayed on the Simpsons:  "We need a true leader, who will do exactly as he's told."

      Besides Iraq, McCain is guaranteed not to deviate from the policy most dear to the republicans -- tax giveaways to the rich.  The one time we escaped that policy, 1993, was a smashing success for everyone, including the rich.  We must elect a president who will do that again.  Everything else is secondary.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (March 23, 2008 10:55 pm ET)
         
      If McCain wins in November it will be because of conservatives that form the base of the Republican party turn out in large numbers. To reward them he will undoubtedly continue most of BOY GEORGE'S polocies. Those will include continuing the IRAQ war and Bush's tax cuts for the Fortune 500 bunch.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (March 23, 2008 11:01 pm ET)
         
      The FACT is John McCain is a right-wing Republican Conservative who will continue the policies of this un-american administration without a blink of the eye. What Bush and company have introduced will be the exact agenda of HIS administration. In other words, there will be NO different philosophy from Bush to McCain. So, we can look forward to at least 4 more YEARS of the same. As Dick Cheney said, "So?" Who can stop this? Not you, and not me. Not as long as Carl and Dick and the rest are running the election with the help of the Media. Me, cynical? Why, naw, not me. I just don't have ANY faith in the public, at least that segment that still believes in the Gawd fearing Bush who fearlessly continues to "keep us safe from the terrorists." It is that segment of the population that helped Bush get elected (along with HIS Supreme Court) and the unwilling and spineless Democrats that refused to challenge the election in the first place. If it worked twice before, it will work again. "So?"

      Bush's approval rating is 30%. It should be 3%. It's that 30% that is so scary! Is this the best we can do? Obviously, INFORMATION counts for nothing to this 30% of Bushbackers.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by interestingobserver (March 23, 2008 11:09 pm ET)
         
      If anyone truly believes that McCain will mimic ALL Bush policies as president as opposed to most Bush politices, or many Bush policies, they are truly not thinking logically.  I think it's perfectly logical that Cameron refer to that position as "mistaken."  Isn't Media Matters the one that usually criticizes reporters for not inserting more critical commentary when sentiments they report do not accord with reality?  I sense some major internal inconsistencies here (then again to be a watchdog for a particular ideological movement I suppose inconsistency is necessary, almost by definition).
      Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (March 24, 2008 7:50 am ET)
           
        Taken to your extreme, no Europeans think that McCain will be 100% identical to Bush.  Thus Cameron is still wrong when he said many Europeans.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by interestingobserver (March 24, 2008 11:34 am ET)
             
          That is a very strong, valid objection.  Cameron most likely is misrepresenting the European polling data.  But notice that was not the objection raised by Media Matters--Media Matters is saying that even if the polling data did reveal that most Euopreans believe McCain will be 100% like Bush, Cameron would STILL be wrong for calling it "mistaken."  And I believe that view itself is woefully mistaken.  
          Report Abuse
      • Author by fromthesouthland (March 24, 2008 9:22 am ET)
           
        If you are an interested observer, read the European newspapers and discussions.  I think you will find that Europeans think Bush policies will extend to McCain.  I wouldn't have agreed with them at one time because of his "maverick" status.  However, my opinion has now changed because of his zealousness in pursing the conservative base.  Other than his stance on torture, I can't find much I like about him. In addition, his closeness to the lobbyists and his not being held to the same standards regarding the submission of his income taxes also causes me concern.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jmmartin3402 (March 24, 2008 1:02 am ET)
         
      Truth is, Carl Cameron doesn't know any Europeans.  Europeans are too intelligent to give Carl Cameron the time of day.  They wouldn't give him air if he were stopped up in a bottle.  They wouldn't fart on him if he were a coprophiliac.  Cameron is employing one of the crudest of the logical fallacies: the straw man.  By claiming that many Europeans mistakenly think that John McPain will be Bush III, Cameron creates a ventriloquist's dummy as a sounding board for what many AMERICANS think of John McPain: that he's going to be Bush III.  And, you know something?  We're right.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Si_W (March 24, 2008 7:53 am ET)
         

      I'm pretty sure that most Europeans have dismissed Cain out of hand as being cut from the same cloth as Bush.  The debate over here seems to be more about whether it'll be Obama or Clinton in the White House next.

      I'd prefer Clinton this time around, but nearly anything would be an improvement.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rumplestilskin396408 (March 24, 2008 12:02 pm ET)
         
      of what consequence is it to we in the u.s. what europeans think? 
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Si_W (March 24, 2008 6:05 pm ET)
           
        Who knows, but it's about time you started listening.  The US is a very insular country.  You want everyone to take heed of your opinions and ideas but not willing to listen.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by roundhouse (March 25, 2008 12:34 am ET)
             
          Your fine English manners, perhaps, inhibit you from relating a blunt but honest observation. I think what you may be trying to say is that Rumplestilskin up there sounds like your standard elitist snob.
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace